scholarly journals Prognostic value of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 447-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenji Xie ◽  
Lihui Liu ◽  
Haixia He ◽  
Kaixuan Yang

Background: Over the past 5 years, many studies have reported the prognostic value of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, the results have not reached a consensus until now. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to investigate the influence of HIF-1α expression on the prognosis and clinical characteristics in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase (via Ovid interface), Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure electronic databases from their establishment to 6 December 2017. We calculated the hazard ratio (HR) and the odds ratio (OR) to assess the prognostic and clinicopathological values of HIF-1α, respectively. Q test and I2 statistic were applied to evaluate heterogeneity. We also conducted publication bias and sensitivity analyses. Results: A total of 18 studies with 1476 patients were included in our meta-analysis. We found HIF-1α expression was associated with poor overall survival (HR=1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35, 2.32; P<0.001), poor progression-free survival (HR=1.72; 95% CI 1.22, 2.44; P=0.002), a higher rate of lymph node metastasis (OR=3.81; 95% CI 2.60, 5.58, P<0.001), and more advanced tumor stage (OR=2.98; 95% CI 1.79, 4.97; P<0.001). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that HIF-1α could be an appropriate prognostic biomarker for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shixu Fang ◽  
Zhou Liu ◽  
Qiang Guo ◽  
Cheng Chen ◽  
Xixian Ke ◽  
...  

Abstract Background BRAF-activated noncoding RNA (BANCR) is aberrantly expressed in various tumor tissues and has been confirmed to function as a tumor suppressor or oncogene in many types of cancers. Considering the conflicting results and insufficient sampling, a meta-analysis was performed to explore the prognostic value of BANCR in various carcinomas. Methods A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) was conducted to collect relevant articles. Results The pooled results showed a strong relationship between high BANCR expression and poor overall survival (OS) (HR (hazard ratio) =1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19–2.15, P = 0.002) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.27–1.85, P < 0.00001). In addition, high BANCR expression predicted advanced tumor stage (OR (odds ratio) =2.39, 95% CI: 1.26–4.53, P = 0.008), presence of lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.08–3.83, P = 0.03), positive distant metastasis (OR = 3.08, 95% CI: 1.92–4.96, P < 0.00001) and larger tumor sizes (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.09–2.46, P = 0.02). However, no associations were found for smoking status (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.65–1.56, P = 0.98), age (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.71–1.09, P = 0.236) and sex (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.72–1.16, P = 0.469). The sensitivity analysis of OS showed that the results of each publication were almost consistent with the combined results, and the merged results have high robustness and reliability. Conclusions The results showed that elevated BANCR expression was associated with unfavorable prognosis for most cancer patients, and BANCR could serve as a promising therapeutic target and independent prognostic predictor in most of cancer types.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Lele Cong ◽  
Hongyan Sun ◽  
Miao Hao ◽  
Qian Sun ◽  
Yang Zheng ◽  
...  

Objective. This meta-analysis was performed to identify the prognostic value of SLNCR1 in multiple cancer types. Methods. Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Medline, BioMed Central, Springer, Science Direct, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), were searched for relevant studies up to August 2021, and the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to assess the relationship between SLNCR1 expression and overall survival (OS). Results. 12 studies with a total of 1155 patients with 9 different types of cancers were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled HR indicates that high SLNCR1 expression represented poorer prognosis of cancer (HR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.59–2.80, I2 = 0%, P < 0.00001 ). Additionally, high SLNCR1 expression was correlated with TNM stage (odds ratio (OR): 1.72, 95% CI: 1.08–2.74, I2 = 62%, P = 0.02 ), lymph node metastasis (LNM) (OR:2.42, 95% CI: 1.61–3.64, I2 = 55%, P < 0.0001 ), and distant metastases (DM) (OR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.50–3.55, I2 = 27%, P = 0.0002 ). However, no evidence was found for a relationship between SLNCR1 expression and clinical features such as tumor size (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 0.93–3.14, I2 = 71%, P = 0.09 ), age (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.68–1.08, I2 = 0%, P = 0.19 ), or gender (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.64–1.81, I2 = 55%, P = 0.79 ). Conclusion. Our findings found that high SLNCR1 expression was associated with poor OS, advanced tumor stage, tumor size, LNM, and DM in multiple cancers, indicating that SLNCR1 may serve as a potential prognostic biomarker for cancer patients in China.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu Gang ◽  
Shi xu Fang ◽  
Zhou Liu ◽  
Qiang Guo ◽  
Cheng Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundBRAF-activated non-coding RNA (BANCR) was reported to be aberrantly expressed in various tumor tissues and has been confirmed to function as tumor suppressor or oncogene in many types of cancers. Considering the conflicting results and insufficient sampling, a meta-analysis was performed to explore the prognostic value of BANCR in various carcinomas.MethodsA comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) was conducted to collected relevant articles.ResultsPooling results showed strong relevance of high BANCR expression and poor overall survival (OS) (HR=1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19-2.15, P =0.002) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR=1.53, 95%CI: 1.27-1.85, P <0.00001). In addition, high BANCR expression predicts advanced tumor stage (OR=2.39, 95%CI: 1.26-4.53, P =0.008), present lymph node metastasis (OR=2.03, 95%CI: 1.08-3.83, P =0.03), positive distant metastasis (OR=3.08, 95%CI: 1.92-4.96, P <0.00001) and bigger tumor size (OR: 1.63, 95%CI: 1.09-2.46, P =0.02).ConclusionsThe results showed that elevated BANCR expression was associated with unfavorable prognosis for most of cancer patients, and BANCR could be served as a promising therapeutic target and independent prognostic predictor for cancers.


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nan Gao ◽  
Ruo-Nan Yang ◽  
Zhen Meng ◽  
Wan-Hai Wang

The C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CRP/Alb ratio) has been reported to have promising prognostic value in several cancers. The current meta-analysis was conducted to better define the prognostic value of CRP/Alb ratio in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and PubMed were searched up to 25 February 2018 for the information on CRP/Alb ratio and outcomes of NPC. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to evaluate the association between CRP/Alb ratio and survival outcomes in NPC. A total of five studies with 5533 patients with NPC were included. Pooled results showed that high CRP/Alb ratio was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.30–1.75, P<0.001) and poor distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.07–1.43, P=0.005). Subgroup analyses showed that patients with higher CRP/Alb ratio have worse OS in NPC. In conclusion, elevated CRP/Alb ratio was associated with worse prognosis in patients with NPC.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi xu Fang ◽  
Zhou Liu ◽  
Qiang Guo ◽  
Cheng Chen ◽  
Xi xian Ke ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: BRAF-activated noncoding RNA (BANCR) is aberrantly expressed in various tumor tissues and has been confirmed to function as a tumor suppressor or oncogene in many types of cancers. Considering the conflicting results and insufficient sampling, a meta-analysis was performed to explore the prognostic value of BANCR in various carcinomas. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) was conducted to collect relevant articles. Results: The pooled results showed a strong relationship between high BANCR expression and poor overall survival (OS) (HR (hazard ratio) =1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19-2.15, P =0.002) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.27-1.85, P <0.00001). In addition, high BANCR expression predicted advanced tumor stage (OR (odds ratio) =2.39, 95% CI: 1.26-4.53, P =0.008), presence of lymph node metastasis (OR=2.03, 95% CI: 1.08-3.83, P =0.03), positive distant metastasis (OR=3.08, 95% CI: 1.92-4.96, P <0.00001) and larger tumor sizes (OR=1.63, 95% CI: 1.09-2.46, P =0.02). However, no associations were found for smoking status (OR=1.01, 95% CI: 0.65-1.56, P =0.98), age (OR=0.88, 95% CI: 0.71-1.09, P =0.236) and sex (OR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.72-1.16, P =0.469). The sensitivity analysis of OS showed that the results of each publication were almost consistent with the combined results, and the merged results have high robustness and reliability. Conclusions: The results showed that elevated BANCR expression was associated with unfavorable prognosis for most cancer patients, and BANCR could serve as a promising therapeutic target and independent prognostic predictor in most of cancer types.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-116
Author(s):  
Dan Zhang ◽  
Lizhen Dai ◽  
ZengXi Yang ◽  
XiChen Wang ◽  
Yin LanNing

Background: The prognostic value of Stathmin 1 (STMN1) in malignant solid tumors remains controversial. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to summarize the potential value of STMN1 as a biomarker for predicting overall survival in patients with solid tumor. Methods: We systematically searched eligible studies in PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE from the establishment date of these databases to September 2018. Hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the association between STMN1 expression and overall survival. Results: A total of 25 studies with 4625 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Our combined results showed that high STMN1 expression was associated with poor overall survival in solid tumors (HR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.55, 2.21). In general, our subgroup and sensitivity analyses demonstrated that our combined results were stable and reliable. However, from the results of the subgroups we found that high STMN1 expression was not related to overall survival in colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer anymore, suggesting that much caution should be taken to interpret our combined result, and more studies with large sample sizes are required to further explore the prognostic value of STMN1 expression in the specific type of tumors, especially colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer. Conclusions: STMN1 could serve as a prognostic biomarker and could be developed as a valuable therapeutic target for patients with solid tumors. However, due to the limitations of the present meta-analysis, this conclusion should be taken with caution. Further studies adequately designed are required to confirm our findings.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caizhi Chen ◽  
Jingjing Wang ◽  
Yeqian Feng ◽  
Ye Liang ◽  
Yan Huang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: LncRNA TP73-AS1 is dysregulated in various tumors but the correlation between its expression and clinicopathological parameters and/or prognoses in cancer patients is inconclusive. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of lncRNA TP73-AS1 for malignancies.Methods: We systematically searched four online databases including PubMed, the Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for eligible articles published up to June 29/2020. Odds ratios (ORs) and Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to assess the association of TP73-AS1 expression with prognostic and clinicopathological parameters. We further validated TP73-AS1 expression in various malignancies and its potential prognostic value using the GEPIA online database. We predicted potential biological processes and relevant signal mechanisms through the public databases.Results: A total of 26 studies including 1770 patients were analyzed to evaluate the relationship between TP73-AS1 expression, clinicopathological features and prognostic indicators. The results indicated that TP73-AS1 expression markedly correlates with TNM stage, tumor size, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis. No correlation with age, gender or differentiation was observed. TP73-AS1 overexpression was a biomarker of poor Overall survival (OS) and Disease-Free-Survival (DFS). Dysregulated TP73-AS1 expression and its prognostic value in various cancers was validated based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Further biological function predictions indicated that TP73-AS1 was involved in pro-oncogenic signaling.Conclusions: The upregulation of LncRNA TP73-AS1 was related to detrimental clinicopathological parameters and can be considered an indicator of poor prognosis for cancer malignancies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 107327482110505
Author(s):  
Zhenzhen Liang ◽  
Lianchang Liu ◽  
Chaowei Wen ◽  
Heya Jiang ◽  
Tianxia Ye ◽  
...  

Purpose Since protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is abnormally expressed in various tumors, in this study we aim to assess the association between PRMT5 and clinicopathological and prognostic features. Methods Electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library were searched until July 25, 2021. The critical appraisal of the eligible studies was performed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated to assess the effect. Engauge Digitizer version 12.1, STATA version 15.1, and R version 4.0.5 were used to obtain and analysis the data. Results A total of 32 original studies covering 15,583 patients were included. In our data, it indicated that high level of PRMT5 was significantly correlated with advanced tumor stage (OR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.22-3.70, P =.008; I2 = 80.7%) and positively correlated with poor overall survival (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.46-1.73, P < .001; I2 = 50%) and progression-free survival (HR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.24-1.88, P < .001; I2 = 0%). In addition, sub-group analysis showed that high level of PRMT5 was associated with poor overall survival for such 5 kinds of cancers as hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer, and lung cancer. Conclusion For the first time we found PRMT5 was pan-cancerous as a prognostic biomarker and high level of PRMT5 was associated with poor prognosis for certain cancers.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 633-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huy Gia Vuong ◽  
Toru Odate ◽  
Hanh T T Ngo ◽  
Thong Quang Pham ◽  
Thao T K Tran ◽  
...  

There are ongoing debates with respect to the prognostic roles of molecular biomarkers in sporadic medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). In this study, we aimed at investigating the prognostic value of RET and RAS mutations – the two most common mutations in sporadic MTCs. A search was conducted in four electronic databases. Relevant data were extracted and pooled into odds ratios (OR), mean differences (MD) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the random-effect model. We used Egger’s regression test and visual of funnel plots to assess the publication bias. From 2581 studies, we included 23 studies with 964 MTCs for meta-analysis. Overall, the presence of RET mutation was associated with an elevated risk for lymph node metastasis (OR = 3.61; 95% CI = 2.33–5.60), distant metastasis (OR = 2.85; 95% CI = 1.64–4.94), advanced tumor stage (OR = 3.25; 95% CI = 2.02–5.25), tumor recurrence (OR = 3.01; 95% CI = 1.65–5.48) and patient mortality (OR = 2.43; 95% CI = 1.06–5.57). RAS mutation had no significant prognostic value in predicting tumor aggressiveness. To summarize, our results affirmed that RET mutation is a reliable molecular biomarker to identify a group of highly aggressive sporadic MTCs. It can help clinicians better assess patient prognosis and select appropriate treatment decisions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Hailun Xie ◽  
Lishuang Wei ◽  
Shuangyi Tang ◽  
Jialiang Gan

Background. Recently, it has been reported that the pretreatment albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) is related to the prognosis of various cancers. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the prognostic value of pretreatment AAPR on clinical outcomes in cancer. Methods. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase were systematically searched for relevant research before May 2020. Stata 12 was utilized to extract the data and the characteristics of each study and to generate a pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess the relationship between pretreatment AAPR and survival outcomes. Results. We included 16 eligible published articles involving 5,716 patients. We found that low pretreatment AAPR was associated with poor overall survival ( HR = 2.12 , 95% CI: 1.80–2.50, P < 0.001 ), cancer-specific survival ( HR = 2.89 , 95% CI: 1.46–5.71, P < 0.001 ), disease-free survival ( HR = 1.91 , 95% CI: 1.43–2.53, P < 0.001 ), and progression-free survival ( HR = 1.93 , 95% CI: 1.49–2.52, P < 0.001 ). However, there was no statistical relationship between pretreatment AAPR and recurrence-free survival, distant-metastasis-free survival, or locoregional relapse-free survival. The correlation between pretreatment AAPR and overall survival did not change significantly when possible confounders were stratified. The sensitivity analysis showed that this study was reliable. Conclusions. Low pretreatment AAPR was significantly associated with adverse clinical outcomes of cancer. Pretreatment AAPR could be a valuable noninvasive prognostic indicator for cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document