Radiographic parameters associated with excellent versus poor range of motion outcomes following reverse shoulder arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
pp. 175857322093623
Author(s):  
Georges Haidamous ◽  
Alexandre Lädermann ◽  
Robert U Hartzler ◽  
Bradford O Parsons ◽  
Evan S Lederman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Component Size ◽  
Excellent Outcome ◽  
Forward Flexion ◽  
Humeral Component ◽  
Radiographic Measurements

Background The purpose was to evaluate the relationship of component size and position to postoperative range of motion following reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The hypothesis was that increased lateralization, larger glenospheres, and a decreased acromiohumeral distance would be associated with excellent postoperative range of motion. Methods A retrospective multicenter study was performed at a minimum of one year postoperatively on 160 patients who underwent primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° humeral component. Outcomes were stratified based on postoperative forward flexion and external rotation into excellent ( n = 42), defined as forward flexion >140° and external rotation > 30°, or poor ( n = 36), defined as forward flexion <100° and external rotation < 15°. Radiographic measurements and component features were compared between the two groups. Results A larger glenosphere size was associated with an excellent outcome ( p = 0.009). A 2-mm posterior offset humeral cup ( p = 0.012) and an increased inferior glenosphere overhang (3.1 mm vs 1.4 mm; p = 0.002) were also associated with excellent outcomes. Humeral lateralization and distalization were not associated with an excellent outcome. Conclusion: Larger glenosphere size and inferior positioning as well as posterior humeral offset are associated with improved postoperative range of motion following reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Level of Evidence Level 3, retrospective comparative study.

Onlay versus inlay humeral components in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 175857322110671
Author(s):  
Garrett R Jackson ◽  
Joshua Meade ◽  
Bradley L Young ◽  
David P Trofa ◽  
Shadley C Schiffern ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Scapular Notching ◽  
Forward Flexion ◽  
Scapular Fractures ◽  
Humeral Component ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vas Scores

Background Advances have been made to the traditional inlay Grammont Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) design such as the onlay humeral component prosthesis. Currently, there is no agreement in the literature regarding the best option for the humeral component when comparing inlay and onlay designs. This review compares the outcomes and complications between onlay versus inlay humeral components for RSA. Methods A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Embase. Only studies reporting outcomes comparing onlay versus inlay RSA humeral components were included. Results Four studies with 298 patients (306 shoulders) were included. Onlay humeral components were associated with better external rotation (ER) ( p < 0.0001). No significant difference in forward flexion (FF) or abduction was found. Constant scores (CS) and VAS scores did not differ. Increased scapular notching was found in the inlay group (23.18%) versus the onlay group (7.74%) ( p = 0.02). Postoperative scapular fractures and acromial fractures did not differ. Conclusion Onlay and inlay RSA designs are associated with improved postoperative range of motion (ROM). Onlay humeral designs may be associated with greater ER and lower rate of scapular notching; however, no difference was found in Constant and VAS scores, so further studies are required to assess the clinical significance of these differences.

scholarly journals Bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of the available evidence

2020 ◽  
pp. 175857322091684
Author(s):  
Richard Dimock ◽  
Mohamed Fathi Elabd ◽  
Mohamed Imam ◽  
Mark Middleton ◽  
Arnaud Godenèche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Autogenous Bone ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Outcome Scores

Background Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has revolutionized the management of many shoulder pathologies. Lateralization has become favourable to combat complications (e.g. notching, compromised external rotation), using a metallic, or autogenous bone-graft baseplates – bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA). We systematically reviewed the literature to determine: Does BIO-RSA improve range of motion and outcome scores? Are notching rates decreased? Does the graft heal? Methods All available prospective studies, trials and case series reporting on BIO-RSA were included. Outcomes were grouped into outcome scores, range of motion and radiographic outcomes. Data were pooled and statistical analysis performed. Results Eight studies reported on 385 RSA – 235 BIO-RSA and 150 standard-RSA (STD-RSA). Follow-up was 20–36 months; average age 74 years. Outcome scores: Constant-Murley and SSV scores showed statistically significant post-operative benefit of BIO-RSA (mean-difference 4.0 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79,7.1) and 6.8 (95% CI: 3.8, 9.9)). No Minimal Clinically Importance Difference was surpassed. Range of motion: No difference was found in any direction. Notching: Notching was less likely with BIO-RSA (odds ratio 0.19 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.38)). Healing and loosening: 92% grafts fully healed/incorporated. Loosening rate was 2.4%. Conclusions Literature on BIO-RSA is limited with only one randomised controlled trial (RCT). Weak evidence exists for improved outcome scores. Range of motion is equivocal. Notching rates are significantly lower in BIO-RSA. The graft usually heals.

Glenosphere design affects range of movement and risk of friction-type scapular impingement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (9) ◽  
pp. 1182-1186 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. S. Werner ◽  
J. Chaoui ◽  
G. Walch
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Glenoid Component ◽  
Range Of Movement ◽  
Scapular Notching ◽  
Component Size ◽  
Centre Of Rotation

Aims Scapular notching is a frequently observed radiographic phenomenon in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), signifying impingement of components. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the effect of glenoid component size and glenosphere type on impingement-free range of movement (ROM) for extension and internal and external rotation in a virtual RSA model, and to determine the optimal configuration to reduce the incidence of friction-type scapular notching. Materials and Methods Preoperative CT scans obtained in 21 patients (three male, 18 female) with primary osteoarthritis were analyzed using modelling software. Two concurrent factors were tested for impingement-free ROM and translation of the centre of rotation: glenosphere diameter (36 mm vs 39 mm) and type (centred, 2 mm inferior eccentric offset, 10° inferior tilt). Results Glenosphere size was most predictive of increased extension and external rotation, whereas lateralization of the centre of rotation was the most predictive factor for internal rotation. A larger diameter of glenosphere combined with a 10° tilted configuration demonstrated superior values for extension and external rotation, whereas the eccentric component improved internal rotation by a mean 8.9° (standard deviation 2.7°) compared with a standard concentric glenosphere. Conclusion Glenosphere configuration can be modified to increase range of movement in RSA. Friction-type scapular notching was most effectively reduced by use of a large-diameter glenosphere with 10° inferior tilt. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1182–6.

scholarly journals Bipolar lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for avoidance of scapular notching

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-212
Author(s):  
Patric Raiss ◽  
Rainer Neumann
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Constant Score ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Scapular Notching ◽  
Neck Shaft Angle ◽  
Shoulder Flexion

Abstract Introduction Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has become a well-established treatment option for multiple disorders of the shoulder joint. In recent years, implant designs and configurations have been modified in order to improve function and avoid complications. Lateralization on the glenoid and the humeral side has been described to improve function and decrease radiographic scapular notching. Data on the clinical and radiographic results of bipolar lateralization in RSA are lacking. Methods In 38 cases, RSA was performed using an uncemented humeral short-stem component with a 145° neck–shaft angle in combination with bone lateralization on the glenoid side (Bony Increased-Offset Reversed Shoulder Arthroplasty, BIO-RSA; Wright Medical Inc., Memphis, TN, USA). Mean follow-up was 19 months (range 12–34 months). Patients were followed clinically using the Constant score as well as range of motion for shoulder flexion and external rotation. Radiographs in two different plains were analyzed for implant seating and the occurrence of scapular notching. Results There was a significant increase in all measured clinical parameters. Forward flexion increased from a mean of 75° preoperatively to 151° postoperatively, and mean Constant score increased from 21 to 71 points postoperatively (p < 0.001). Glenoid notching of grade 1 according to Sirveuax was observed in 3 out of 35 cases (9%); no grade 2, 3, or 4 notching was present. Revision surgery was necessary in one case (3%). Conclusion RSA with bipolar lateralization leads to excellent clinical outcomes, low complication rates, and low rates of radiographic scapular notching. Longer follow-up and prospective randomized trials are needed. Level of evidence Level IV.

The biomechanical effectiveness of tendon transfers to restore rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: latissimus versus lower trapezius

2020 ◽  
pp. 175857322094625
Author(s):  
Kevin Chan ◽  
G Daniel G Langohr ◽  
George S Athwal ◽  
James A Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Latissimus Dorsi ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Pectoralis Major ◽  
Tendon Transfers ◽  
Humeral Component ◽  
Pectoralis Major Transfer ◽  
Lower Trapezius

Background The purpose of this biomechanical simulator study was primarily to compare latissimus dorsi to lower trapezius tendon transfers for active external rotation and the pectoralis major transfer for internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Secondarily, the role of humeral component lateralization on transfer function was assessed. Methods Eight rotator cuff deficient cadavers underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty with an adjustable lateralization humeral component. Latissimus dorsi and lower trapezius transfers were compared for active external rotation restoration and pectoralis major transfer for internal rotation restoration. Internal rotation/external rotation torques were measured for each lateralization at varying abduction and internal rotation/external rotation ranges-of-motion. Results The lower trapezius transfer generated, on average, 1.6 ± 0.2 nm more torque than the latissimus dorsi transfer (p < 0.001). The internal rotation/external rotation torques of all tendon transfers decreased as abduction increased (p < 0.01). At 0° elevation, reverse shoulder arthroplasty humeral component lateralization had a significant positive effect on tendon transfer torque at 60° internal rotation and external rotation (p < 0.01). Discussion Both the lower trapezius and the latissimus dorsi tendon transfers were effective in restoring active external rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty; however, the lower trapezius generated significantly more torque. Additionally, the pectoralis major transfer was effective in restoring active internal rotation. All tendon transfers were optimized with greater humeral component lateralization.

scholarly journals Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty with Bony and Metallic versus Standard Bony Reconstruction for Severe Glenoid Bone Loss. A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (22) ◽  
pp. 5274
Author(s):  
Marko Nabergoj ◽  
Lionel Neyton ◽  
Hugo Bothorel ◽  
Sean W. L. Ho ◽  
Sidi Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Bone Graft ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Constant Score ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Glenoid Bone Loss ◽  
Forward Flexion ◽  
Glenoid Morphology ◽  
Comparative Cohort Study

There are different techniques to address severe glenoid erosion during reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This study assessed the clinical and radiological outcomes of RSA with combined bony and metallic augment (BMA) glenoid reconstruction compared to bony augmentation (BA) alone. A review of patients who underwent RSA with severe glenoid bone loss requiring reconstruction from January 2017 to January 2019 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: BMA versus BA alone. Clinical outcome measurements included two years postoperative ROM, Constant score, subjective shoulder value (SSV), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) score. Radiological outcomes included radiographic evidence of scapular complications and graft incorporation. The BMA group had significantly different glenoid morphology (p < 0.001) and greater bone loss thickness than the BA group (16.3 ± 3.8 mm vs. 12.0 ± 0.0 mm, p = 0.020). Both groups had significantly improved ROM (anterior forward flexion and external rotation) and clinical scores (Constant, SSV and ASES scores) at 2 years. Greater improvement was observed in the BMA group in terms of anterior forward flexion (86.3° ± 27.9° vs. 43.8° ± 25.6°, p = 0.013) and Constant score (56.6 ± 10.1 vs. 38.3 ± 16.7, p = 0.021). The BA group demonstrated greater functional and clinical improvements with higher postoperative active external rotation and ASES results (active external rotation, 49.4° ± 17.0° vs. 29.4° ± 14.7°, p = 0.017; ASES, 89.1 ± 11.3 vs. 76.8 ± 11.0, p = 0.045). The combination use of bone graft and metallic augments in severe glenoid bone loss during RSA is safe and effective and can be considered in cases of severe glenoid bone loss where bone graft alone may be insufficient.

scholarly journals Shoulder and Elbow Range of Motion Can Be Maintained in Major League Baseball Pitchers Over the Course of the Season, Regardless of Pitching Workload

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 232596711882506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. McGraw ◽  
Michael Vrla ◽  
Dean Wang ◽  
Christopher L. Camp ◽  
John M. Zajac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Major League Baseball ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Forward Flexion ◽  
Major League ◽  
Baseball Pitchers ◽  
Control Study

Background: Studies examining the evolution of shoulder and elbow range of motion (ROM) in baseball pitchers over a single season have yielded inconsistent results. Purpose: To evaluate shoulder and elbow ROM in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers over a single season and to assess for correlations between these changes and measures of a pitcher’s workload. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Bilateral shoulder ROM (internal rotation [IR], external rotation [ER], and total range of motion [TROM]) was assessed in 92 MLB pitchers pre- and postseason. Shoulder forward flexion (FF) was measured in 64 pitchers, horizontal adduction (HA) was measured in 87 pitchers, and elbow ROM was measured in 86 pitchers. Data collected included demographics (age, height, weight, and body mass index) and measures of workload for pitchers (pitches thrown, innings pitched, and mean fastball velocity). Pitchers were not specifically excluded if they had an injury during the season but had recovered and were actively pitching at the time of postseason measurements. The change in motion from pre- to postseason was measured and the associations with player demographics and workload were calculated by use of the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: On average, pitchers demonstrated an increase in dominant shoulder ER from 118.8° to 125.4° ( P < .001) and TROM from 173.1° to 181.7° ( P < .001). HA was increased by an average of 15.7° ( P < .001). The average shoulder IR ( P = .189), FF ( P = .432), and elbow ROM (flexion, P = .549; extension, P = .185) remained similar over the span of the season. Average glenohumeral IR deficit did not increase. Pitcher demographics and measures of throwing workload (total pitches thrown, innings pitched, mean fastball velocity) were not significantly correlated with changes in shoulder or elbow ROM. Conclusion: Significant increases in dominant shoulder ER, TROM, and HA were identified in MLB pitchers over the course of a single baseball season. These ROM changes were not correlated with measures of pitching workload.

scholarly journals Range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: which combinations of humeral stem and glenosphere work best?

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-178
Author(s):  
Alexandre Lädermann ◽  
Philippe Collin ◽  
Patrick J. Denard
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Dramatic Improvement ◽  
Prosthetic Design ◽  
Neck Shaft Angle ◽  
Forward Flexion ◽  
Shaft Angle ◽  
Case Basis

Abstract A variety of changes in prosthetic design have been proposed to address the complications of Grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The Grammont RSA is excellent at restoring forward flexion, but often leads to little improvement in external and internal rotation. The purpose of this review was to analyze the effect of different glenoid and humeral configurations on range of motion (ROM) following RSA. With low neck-shaft angle (135–145 degrees), glenosphere lateralization, and eccentricity, elevation remains unchanged, abduction slightly decreases, but a dramatic improvement in adduction, extension, and rotations with the elbow at the side are observed. However, all prosthetic designs should be considered on a case-by-case basis to optimize outcome.

scholarly journals Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Primary Synovial Osteochondromatosis of the Shoulder with Massive Rotator Cuff Tear and Marked Degenerative Arthropathy

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 189
Author(s):  
Toru Ichiseki ◽  
Shusuke Ueda ◽  
Daisuke Souma ◽  
Miyako Shimasaki ◽  
Yoshimichi Ueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Histopathological Examination ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Floating Body ◽  
Left Shoulder ◽  
Synovial Osteochondromatosis

Synovial osteochondromatosis (SO) is a rare disease in which chondrometaplasia develops in the synovium of joints, bursa, and tendon sheaths. SO is found most frequently in the knee joint, while cases of SO developing in the shoulder joint are rare, accounting for only 1.9–5.2% of all SO cases. Moreover, most of these cases show secondary rather than primary involvement. In a patient with SO associated with extensive rotator cuff tearing and marked arthropathic changes, we performed mass resection and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), and obtained good pain relief and functional improvement. The patient was a 75-year-old woman who had developed left shoulder pain five years earlier without any known precipitating factor. The range of motion of the left shoulder showed extremely severe restriction, with flexion 80°, abduction 60°, and external rotation 0°, and prominent impingement symptoms. On plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT), prominent shoulder arthropathic changes were found. On plain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), around the shoulder, an irregular hypointense region was identified in the center on T1-enhanced images, while hyperintense nodular lesions with a hypointense center were detected on T2-enhanced images. Since extensive rotator cuff tearing was also found, a diagnosis of OS associated with rotator cuff tearing and arthropathic changes was made. Surgery consisted of resection of a whitish mass-like floating body in the center of the joint followed by RSA. The postoperative course was uneventful, and one year postoperatively there was no recurrence of pain and the range of motion of the left shoulder had improved to flexion 140°, abduction 130°, and external rotation 30°. Moreover, no complications such as recurrence of osteochondromatosis, implant loosening, or infection were seen. On histopathological examination, the loose body was found to consist of a cartilage component and bone tissue with hyalinization. No findings indicative of malignancy were apparent, and since nodular cartilage arrangement was found, primary osteochondroma was diagnosed. These findings suggested that physical friction between the rotator cuff and the mass was the cause of the rotator cuff tearing, and that the extensive rotator cuff tearing accounted for the progression of the associated extremely severe arthropathic changes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document