Does fluoroscopy improve baseplate position compared to conventional technique in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A preliminary study

2021 ◽  
pp. 175857322110206
Author(s):  
María Galán-Olleros ◽  
Yaiza Lopiz ◽  
Gabriel Ciller ◽  
Borja Alcobía-Díaz ◽  
Carlos García-Fernández ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Mean Deviation ◽  
Glenoid Component ◽  
Surgical Time ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Surgical Assistance ◽  
Intraoperative Fluoroscopy

Background Accurate placement of glenoid component in reverse shoulder arthroplasty remains a challenge for surgeons of all levels of expertise; however, no studies have evaluated the utility of fluoroscopy as a surgical assistance method. Methods Prospective comparative study of 33 patients undergoing primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty during a 12-month period. Fifteen patients had a baseplate placed using the conventional “free hand” technique (control group), and 18 patients using intraoperative fluoroscopy assistance group, in a case–control design. Postoperative glenoid position was evaluated on postoperative Computed Tomography (CT) scan. Results The mean deviation of version and inclination for fluoroscopy assistance vs. control group was 1.75° (0.675–3.125) vs. 4.2° (1.975–10.45) (p = .015), and 3.85° (0–7.225) vs. 10.35° (4.35–18.75) (p = .009). The distance from the central peg midpoint to the inferior glenoid rim (fluoroscopy assistance 14.61 mm/control 4.75 mm, p = .581) and the surgical time (fluoroscopy assistance 1.93 ± 0.57/control 2.18 ± 0.44 h, p = .400) showed no differences, with an average radiation dose of 0.45 mGy and fluoroscopy time of 14 s. Conclusions Accurate axial and coronal scapular plane positioning of glenoid component is improved with intraoperative fluoroscopy at the cost of a greater radiation dose and without differences in surgical time. Comparative studies are needed to determine whether their use in relation to more expensive surgical assistance systems result in similar effectiveness. Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.

Effect of glenoid perforation during total shoulder arthroplasty on glenoid component cement fixation and suprascapular nerve

2020 ◽  
pp. 175857321989704
Author(s):  
Gregory I Pace ◽  
Rachel A Thomas ◽  
Connor L Zale ◽  
Gregory S Lewis ◽  
Raymond Y Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancellous Bone ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Spatial Relationship ◽  
Suprascapular Nerve ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Glenoid Component ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Basic Science Study ◽  
Perforation Group

Background Arthritic glenoids are susceptible to vault perforation during total shoulder arthroplasty. We investigated the effects of glenoid perforation and subsequent cement extrusion on the suprascapular nerve and on the glenoid cement infiltration. Methods Total shoulder arthroplasty using three-pegged glenoid components were performed on 10 cadaveric shoulders assigned to two groups (perforation vs. control). In perforation group, the glenoids were reamed eccentrically and intentionally perforated medially through the central peg hole, whereas control group received perpendicular reaming with no perforation. Bone cement was applied to each peg. Spatial relationship between the extruded cement and the suprascapular nerve, and the amount of cement infiltration into the cancellous bone were evaluated. Results In perforation group, five specimens were perforated anteriorly, and two posteriorly. In the two posteriorly perforated specimens, the suprascapular nerve was in direct contact with extruded cement at the spinoglenoid notch. Perforation group showed significantly less cement infiltration into the cancellous bone than control group ( p = 0.008). Conclusions Glenoid perforation decreases the volume of cement infiltration into the cancellous bone potentially compromising glenoid component fixation. Glenoid perforation tends to occur anteriorly rather than posteriorly in arthritic glenoids; however, if perforation occurs posteriorly, the suprascapular nerve is at immediate risk from the extruded cement. Level of evidence: Basic science study.

Glenoid bone grafting in primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
pp. 175857322091765
Author(s):  
Betty Zhang ◽  
Gavinn Niroopan ◽  
Chetan Gohal ◽  
Bashar Alolabi ◽  
Timothy Leroux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasties ◽  
Component Loosening ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasties

Background Primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty can be challenging in patients with complex glenoid wear patterns and bone loss. Severe retroversion (>15°) or significant bone loss may require bone grafting. This review summarizes the rate of revision and long-term outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with bone graft. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL databases was conducted from the date of inception to 23 October 2018. Two reviewers independently screened articles for eligibility and extracted data for analysis. The primary outcome was rate of revision. The secondary outcomes were rate of component loosening, functional outcome, and range of motion. Results Of the 1056 articles identified in the search, 26 underwent full-text screening and 7 articles were included in the analysis. All procedures were one-stage anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties. The rate of revision was 5.4% with component loosening and infection listed as indications over a weighted mean follow-up period of 6.3 years. Complications occurred in 12.6% of patients. Conclusion Glenoid bone grafting in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty results in comparable revision rates and improvement in pain compared to augmented glenoid components and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Due to the low quality of evidence, further prospective studies should be conducted. Level of evidence IV

scholarly journals Causes of acromion and scapular spine fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis and literature review

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 2673-2681
Author(s):  
Richard W. Nyffeler ◽  
Bartu Altioklar ◽  
Philipp Bissig
Keyword(s):  
Bone Quality ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Spine Fractures ◽  
Poor Bone Quality ◽  
Significant Deterioration ◽  
Scapular Spine

Abstract Purpose Fractures of the acromion and the scapular spine are serious complications after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. They concern about 4 to 5% of the patients and always result in a significant deterioration of shoulder function. Different causes have been taken into consideration, particularly stress or fatigue fractures. The purpose of the present study was to analyse our own cases and to discuss the causes reported in the literature. Methods We reviewed our shoulder arthroplasty registry and the consultation reports of the last ten years. The charts and radiographs of all patients who had a post-operative fracture of the acromion or the scapular spine were carefully examined and the results were compared with those of an age- and gender-matched control group. Results Twelve patients with an average age of 79 years sustained a fracture of the acromion (n = 6) or the scapular spine (n = 6). The time interval between the operation and the fracture averaged 26 months and ranged from three weeks to 70 months. Eight patients (67%) had a trauma. Seven of them reported a fall on the corresponding shoulder and one a heavy blow on the acromion. The four non-traumatic fractures were attributed to poor bone quality. All 12 patients had immediate pain and difficulty to actively elevate the affected arm. The time interval between the fracture and its diagnosis averaged ten weeks (0 to 10 months). At final follow-up, all patients could reach their face and refused further surgery. Two patients rated their result as good, six as acceptable and four as poor. Conclusions Our study cannot support the hypothesis that most acromion and scapular spine fractures after RSA are the result of increased tension in the deltoid or stress fractures. In our series, the majority of the fractures were related to a fall. Implantation of a reverse prosthesis exposes the acromion and makes it more vulnerable to direct trauma. Non-traumatic fractures were associated with poor bone quality.

Glenosphere design affects range of movement and risk of friction-type scapular impingement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (9) ◽  
pp. 1182-1186 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. S. Werner ◽  
J. Chaoui ◽  
G. Walch
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Glenoid Component ◽  
Range Of Movement ◽  
Scapular Notching ◽  
Component Size ◽  
Centre Of Rotation

Aims Scapular notching is a frequently observed radiographic phenomenon in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), signifying impingement of components. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the effect of glenoid component size and glenosphere type on impingement-free range of movement (ROM) for extension and internal and external rotation in a virtual RSA model, and to determine the optimal configuration to reduce the incidence of friction-type scapular notching. Materials and Methods Preoperative CT scans obtained in 21 patients (three male, 18 female) with primary osteoarthritis were analyzed using modelling software. Two concurrent factors were tested for impingement-free ROM and translation of the centre of rotation: glenosphere diameter (36 mm vs 39 mm) and type (centred, 2 mm inferior eccentric offset, 10° inferior tilt). Results Glenosphere size was most predictive of increased extension and external rotation, whereas lateralization of the centre of rotation was the most predictive factor for internal rotation. A larger diameter of glenosphere combined with a 10° tilted configuration demonstrated superior values for extension and external rotation, whereas the eccentric component improved internal rotation by a mean 8.9° (standard deviation 2.7°) compared with a standard concentric glenosphere. Conclusion Glenosphere configuration can be modified to increase range of movement in RSA. Friction-type scapular notching was most effectively reduced by use of a large-diameter glenosphere with 10° inferior tilt. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1182–6.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the effectiveness of the use of low-traumatic surgical access in the reverse shoulder arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 21-28
Author(s):  
Gurgen A. Kesyan ◽  
Grigoriy S. Karapetyan ◽  
Artem A. Shuyskiy ◽  
Rashid Z. Urazgil'deev ◽  
Igor' G. Arsen'ev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Shoulder Joint ◽  
Subcutaneous Tissue ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Main Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Surgical Access

BACKGROUND: The number of reversible shoulder joint endoprostheses installed in the world at the present stage is several times greater than the number of hemiarthroplasty performed. Nevertheless shoulder arthroplasty is considered a traumatic operation and can be accompanied by a number of complications, both from the side of implants and due to the traumatic nature of the surgical technique. During surgical interventions on the shoulder joint with a wide dissection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, iatrogenic damage to structures such as the axillary nerve, posterior and anterior arteries and veins surrounding the humerus can often be detected, which triggers a whole cascade of pathophysiological and regulatory processes in which Interventions immediately release inflammatory mediators. Therefore, orthopedic traumatologists strive to reduce the risk of intra- and postoperative complications, and it is necessary to improve the surgical technique of surgical interventions towards their less traumatic performance. AIM: Development and evaluation of the effectiveness of the use of low-traumatic surgical access when performing reverse shoulder arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the period 20172020, 169 patients with various diseases, injuries of the shoulder joint and their consequences were operated on in the Department of Adult Orthopedics of the N.N. Priorov National Research Medical Center of the Russian Federation, who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty according to generally accepted indications. In the main group (84 patients), surgical treatment was performed using a low-traumatic surgical approach, while the control group (85 patients) underwent standard procedures. Functional, clinical and radiological results of surgical treatment of patients of the main and control groups were evaluated and compared after 3, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: In the main group, excellent results (25 points on DASH) were observed in 73 patients, good results (2650 points) in 10 patients. In 1 patient, the results were assessed as satisfactory (5175 points). In the control group of observation, the clinical result was worse (68 excellent, 16 good and 1 satisfactory result). CONCLUSION: On the basis of the performed study, taking into account the better results in the main group of patients, the technique of low-traumatic surgical access for reverse shoulder arthroplasty can be recommended for wide use in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Bipolar lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for avoidance of scapular notching

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-212
Author(s):  
Patric Raiss ◽  
Rainer Neumann
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Constant Score ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Scapular Notching ◽  
Neck Shaft Angle ◽  
Shoulder Flexion

Abstract Introduction Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has become a well-established treatment option for multiple disorders of the shoulder joint. In recent years, implant designs and configurations have been modified in order to improve function and avoid complications. Lateralization on the glenoid and the humeral side has been described to improve function and decrease radiographic scapular notching. Data on the clinical and radiographic results of bipolar lateralization in RSA are lacking. Methods In 38 cases, RSA was performed using an uncemented humeral short-stem component with a 145° neck–shaft angle in combination with bone lateralization on the glenoid side (Bony Increased-Offset Reversed Shoulder Arthroplasty, BIO-RSA; Wright Medical Inc., Memphis, TN, USA). Mean follow-up was 19 months (range 12–34 months). Patients were followed clinically using the Constant score as well as range of motion for shoulder flexion and external rotation. Radiographs in two different plains were analyzed for implant seating and the occurrence of scapular notching. Results There was a significant increase in all measured clinical parameters. Forward flexion increased from a mean of 75° preoperatively to 151° postoperatively, and mean Constant score increased from 21 to 71 points postoperatively (p < 0.001). Glenoid notching of grade 1 according to Sirveuax was observed in 3 out of 35 cases (9%); no grade 2, 3, or 4 notching was present. Revision surgery was necessary in one case (3%). Conclusion RSA with bipolar lateralization leads to excellent clinical outcomes, low complication rates, and low rates of radiographic scapular notching. Longer follow-up and prospective randomized trials are needed. Level of evidence Level IV.

scholarly journals Case Report: Watching and Waiting? A Case of Incomplete Glenosphere Seating With Spontaneous Reversal in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 247154922094914
Author(s):  
Micah L MacAskill ◽  
Rachel J Thomas ◽  
Leslie A Barnes
Keyword(s):  
Conservative Management ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Glenoid Component ◽  
Viable Option ◽  
Scapular Notching ◽  
Spontaneous Reversal ◽  
No Gold Standard ◽  
Design Factors

Introduction: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is a useful procedure with broadening applications, but it has the best outcomes when used for rotator cuff tear arthropathy. However, this procedure is not without complications. While scapular notching and aseptic loosening are more common complications that have been extensively studied in the literature, dissociation of the glenoid component and incomplete glenosphere seating has not received much attention. Specifically, little research has explored appropriate management of incomplete seating of the glenosphere component, and no gold standard for treatment of this complication has emerged. Methods: In the case described here, an elderly patient with an incompletely seated glenosphere component post-operatively opted to pursue conservative management in order to avoid revision surgery if possible. Results: The partially engaged, superiorly directed components in this case exhibited spontaneous complete and symmetric seating of the glenosphere between six and twelve months post-operatively, indicating that conservative management of this complication in low-demand patients may be a viable option to avoid the risks associated with revision surgery. Conclusion: Further research should be pursued to explore what patient and prosthesis design factors may be suited to observation with serial radiographs when incomplete seating of the glenosphere component occurs.

The effect of load and plane of elevation on acromial stress after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
pp. 175857322091009
Author(s):  
Jason S Lockhart ◽  
Murray T Wong ◽  
G Daniel G Langohr ◽  
George S Athwal ◽  
James A Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Finite Element Models ◽  
Stress Distributions ◽  
Science Study ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Basic Science Study ◽  
Humeral Offset ◽  
Tomography Data

Background Acromial fractures are a substantial complication following reverse shoulder arthroplasty, reported to affect up to 7% of patients. Previous studies have shown that implant placement affects acromial stress during elevation of the arm in the scaption plane. The purpose of this study was to investigate the results of arm loading and variation in plane of elevation on acromial stresses. Methods Nine elevation angles (0°–120°), in three planes of elevation (abduction (0°), scaption (30°), and forward elevation (60°)), and three hand loads (0, 2.5, 5 kg) were investigated. Finite element models were generated using computed tomography data from 10 cadaveric shoulders (age 68 ± 19 yrs) to determine acromial stress distributions. Models were created for a lateralized glenosphere (0, 5, 10 mm), inferiorized glenosphere (0, 2.5, 5 mm), and humeral offset (−5, 0, 5 mm). Results For all planes of elevation (0°, 30°, 60°) and hand loads (0, 2.5, 5 kg) investigated, glenoid lateralization consistently increased acromial stress, glenoid inferiorization consistently decreased acromial stress, and humeral offset proved to be insignificant in altering acromial stress. Abduction resulted in significantly higher peak acromial stresses (p = 0.002) as compared to scaption and forward elevation. Conclusions In addition to implant position and design, patient activity, such as plane of elevation and hand loads, has substantial effects on acromial stresses. Level of evidence Basic science study

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document