The Effects of Timing of Ankle Blocks in Forefoot, Midfoot, or Hindfoot Reconstruction With the Use of an Ankle Tourniquet

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 527-533
Author(s):  
James Gwosdz ◽  
Lattisha Bilbrew ◽  
Daniel Jupiter ◽  
Vinod Panchbhavi
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Comparative Trial ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Level Ii ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Tourniquet Inflation

Background. Ankle blocks are used in the ambulatory surgery setting to control postoperative pain, which is often worst in the first 24 hours after surgery. We conducted a trial to determine whether the timing of ankle block administration in relation to ankle tourniquet inflation has an effect on perceived pain and narcotic consumption. Methods. A prospective randomized study was conducted between August 2015 and January 2016. Patients were assigned to three groups. In group A, an ankle block was performed before ankle tourniquet inflation; in group B, immediately after ankle tourniquet inflation; and in group C, immediately after ankle tourniquet inflation with additional local anesthetic placed around the incision at the end of the procedure. Pain was assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS) score, which was recorded at discharge, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 2 weeks after surgery. Narcotic consumption was recorded at 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Results. The only statistically significant difference in mean VAS scores occurred at 24 hours, when patients who received an ankle block after tourniquet inflation with local incisional anesthetic at closure (group C) had a mean VAS score 2.8 points lower (3.5 vs 6.3; P = .025) than those who received only an ankle block after tourniquet inflation (group B). There was no difference in narcotic consumption between groups at 24 and 48 hours. Conclusions. The timing of ankle block in relation to tourniquet inflation did not have an effect on pain control in forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot reconstruction. The synergistic effect of an ankle block with additional incisional anesthetic at closure, is more effective than ankle block alone and is the ideal combination for postoperative pain control in foot surgery. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level II: Prospective, comparative trial

scholarly journals Comparison between scalpel incision and electrocautery incision in midline abdominal surgery: a comparative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1507
Author(s):  
Amit Yadav ◽  
Lakshman Agarwal ◽  
Sumit A. Jain ◽  
Sanjay Kumawat ◽  
Sandeep Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
P Value ◽  
Wound Area ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Fear of poor wound healing have curtailed the use of diathermy for making skin incision. Scalpel produces little damage to surrounding tissue but causing more blood loss. Our aim of study was to compare electrocautery incision with scalpel incision in terms of incision time, blood loss, postoperative pain and wound infection.Methods: Total of 104 patients were included in the study undergoing midline abdominal surgery. Patients were randomized into electrocautery (group A) and scalpel (group B). The incision dimension, incision time and blood loss were noted intraoperatively. Postoperative pain was noted on postoperative day 2 using visual analog scale. Wound complications were recorded on every postoperative day till the patient was discharged.Results: 52 patients in each of the two groups were analyzed. There was significant difference found between group A and group B in terms of mean incision time per unit wound area, 8.16±1.59 s\cm2 and 11.02±1.72 s\cm2 respectively (p value=0.0001). The mean blood loss per unit wound area was found to be significantly lower in group A (0.31±0.04 ml\cm2) as compared to group B (1.21±0.21), p value=0.0001. There was no significant difference noted in terms of postoperative pain and wound infection between both groups.Conclusions: Electrocautery can be considered safe in making skin incision in midline laparotomy compared to scalpel incision with comparable postoperative pain and wound infection with less intraoperative blood loss and less time consuming.

The Treatment of Wrist Ganglion Cyst by the Chinese Acupotomy and Crisscross Thread

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuliang Zhang ◽  
Bin Xu ◽  
Yangjun Lao ◽  
Di Lu
Keyword(s):  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Ganglion Cyst ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Ganglion Cysts ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Open Excision

Abstract Background: The current treatments of wrist ganglion have considerable recurrence rate, we developed a new treatment for ganglion cysts in our clinical practice, which combined acupotomy with crisscross thread method, so we now to compare the clinical effectiveness of Chinese acupotomy and crisscross thread with aspiration followed by injection of steroid and open excision for ganglion cysts treatment. Methods: Recruited patients with wrist ganglion were divided into three groups according to the treatments. Among them, 27 patients who were treated by a new combined treatment of Chinese acupotomy and crisscross thread method in group A, 30 patients who were treated by aspiration followed by steroid injection in group B, and 28 patients who were treated by open excision in group C. The data of age, gender, weight, size of ganglion cysts, visual analogue scale (VAS) , cost were recorded and compared by One-way analysis of variance, followed by an LSD (Least Significant Difference)test. The recurrence rates were recorded were analysed by chi-square test.Results: At the first day and one week after treatment, VAS score of group A was similar to group B with no statistic difference. VAS score of group C was higher than group A and B with statistic difference. Six months later, there was no statistic difference among the three groups about VAS. The recurrence rate was 3.7% in group A and 36.7% in group B and 10.7% in group C. No patient infected in three groups. The cost of group A was more than group B with no statistic difference. The cost of group A was much less than group C with statistic difference.Conclusions: The combination of Chinese acupotomy and crisscross thread method was a simple, economical and effective procedure for wrist ganglion cysts.

scholarly journals Hematoma block for distal radius fractures – prospective, randomized comparison of two different volumes of lidocaine

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 4535-4538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagay Orbach ◽  
Nimrod Rozen ◽  
Barak Rinat ◽  
Guy Rubin
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Fracture Site ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
Group B

Objective This study aimed to compare analgesic efficacy and safety of different volumes of lidocaine injected into a fracture hematoma (hematoma block [HB]) for reducing distal radius fractures. Methods Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group A included patients in whom 10 mL of 2% lidocaine was injected into the fracture site and group B included patients in whom 20 mL of 1% lidocaine was injected. The fracture was manipulated after 15 minutes and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was recorded during manipulation. Patients were followed up for approximately 1 hour and complications were recorded. Results Twenty patients were enrolled in the study (12 women and eight men), with a mean age of 57 years (range, 32–87 years). Demographic findings were similar between the groups. The mean VAS score of group A was 5.50 ± 3.57 and that in group B was 3.09 ± 2.33, with no significant difference between the groups. Conclusion VAS scores between HB with 20 mL of 1% lidocaine and HB with 10 mL of 2% lidocaine are not significantly different. However, our study suggests that HB with 20 mL of 1% lidocaine has a better analgesic effect than HB with 10 mL of 2% lidocaine.

scholarly journals Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery: Randomised Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prashant Sachan ◽  
Prem Raj Singh ◽  
Sateesh Verma ◽  
Brij Bihari Kushwaha
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Haemodynamic Stability ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Introduction: Pain control is an important factor for postoperative recovery. Many drugs have been studied for effectiveness of postoperative analgesia. Fentanyl is a conventional drug and dexmedetomidine is one of the emerging drugs used for analgesia and postoperative pain control. Aim: To compare the effect of fentanyl and dexmedetomidine on pain control and haemodynamic stability. Materials and Methods: A randomised controlled trial was conducted on 60 patients (30 each group) undergoing for abdominal surgery, between January 2019 to January 2020. Group A received fentanyl loading dose 2 μg/kg I.V. followed by 0.5 μg/kg/hr infusion and group B received dexmedetomidine loading 1 μg/kg over 10 minutes followed by maintenance 0.5 μg/kg/hr infusion. Infusion was continued up to four hours during surgery and till eight hours of postoperative in both groups. Haemodynamic parameters {Heart Rate (HR), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)} were recorded after start of study drug infusion, after intubation, then every 15 minutes till 1 hour, then every 30 minutes till end of surgery and after extubation. In postoperative period, HR and MAP were recorded at interval of one hour till eight hours after extubation and postoperative analgesia was assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at interval of one hour till eight hours. Present study used descriptive statistical analysis for data analysis. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare data between two groups. Chi-square test was used to find the significance of difference on categorical scale between two groups. Results: This study showed that group-B had significantly less VAS score most of time in recovery period as compared to group-A (1.97±0.18 vs 2.10±0.31 at eight hours postoperative). HR, MAP was found significantly less all the time during surgery and most of the time postoperatively in group-B (p-value <0.05). Conclusion: Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine can be better for controlling postoperative pain and perioperative haemodynamic stability as compared to infusion of fentanyl in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries.

scholarly journals Closed versus open lateral internal anal sphincterotomy in a chronic anal fissure

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 1055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anandaravi B. N. ◽  
Ramaswami B.
Keyword(s):  
Anal Fissure ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Chronic Anal Fissure ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy ◽  
Internal Sphincterotomy ◽  
Closed Technique ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Anal fissure is a common proctological problem, which presents with pain in the anal region during and after defecation. The aim of the study was to determine the best technique for surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure patients.Methods: The study was designed as a prospective randomized study. The study was conducted in surgical unit, K.R. Hospital, MMCRI, Mysore, India from January 2015 to June 2016. A total of 100 patients undergoing surgery were divided into two groups. In group A there were 50 patients who were treated by closed lateral internal anal sphincterotomy, and in group B there were 50 patients who were managed by open lateral internal anal sphincterotomy method. Patients were followed up for 6 months following surgery to observe for pain, bleeding, infection, incontinence, and recurrence. The exclusion criteria were patients who had in addition haemorrhoids or any other anorectal diseases.Results: There was acceptable difference in postoperative acute complications between the two methods of internal anal sphincterotomy. However, in group A, three patients (6%) versus 10 (20%) were complicated with incontinence postoperatively, whereas the recurrence rate was 4 versus 4% in group A versus group B, respectively (P = 0.015).Conclusions: There was significant difference between closed and open methods of lateral internal sphincterotomy in recurrence rate, healing rate, and other complications. Closed lateral internal sphincterotomy is treatment of choice for chronic anal fissure and can be done effectively and safely with acceptable rate of complications. Our recommendations are that closed technique should be adopted by experienced surgeons and Trainee should be initially trained by open technique then be shifted to closed technique.

scholarly journals Tramadol or Nalbuphine; Which One is Superior for Analgesia in Post-Operative Period after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-54
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sheraz Javed ◽  
◽  
Ghulam Mehboob Subhani ◽  
Muhammad Akmal ◽  
Muhammad Irfan Munir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Control ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Post Operative Period ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Medical University ◽  
Pain Rating Scale

Background: Kidney stones has got high prevalence worldwide especially in our part of world and per-cutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is gold standard operative modality for renal stone management. Pain control after PCNL is the most important task for treating surgeon as effective pain control causes smooth patient recovery in post-operative period. For analgesia, many drugs can be used, out of which tramadol and nalbuphine always been in comparison for effective analgesic activity. Objective: To compare efficacy of tramadol and nalbuphine as potent analgesic in patients after PCNL. Study Design: A prospective randomized study. Settings: Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Allied Hospital/Faisalabad Medical University, Faisalabad and Department of Urology, DHQ Hospital/Faisalabad Medical University, Faisalabad Pakistan. Duration: From September 2016 to September 2020 (4 Years). Methodology: 286 patients undergoing PCNL for either gender and sides enrolled in study according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients divided into Group A (Administered with tramadol) and Group B (administered with nalbuphine) and patients evaluated for pain up to 48 hours after surgery using 11-point numerical pain rating scale rating from0-10 where 0 is no pain, 1-3 mild pain, 4-6 moderate pain, 7-9 severe pain and 10 as worst pain and use of rescue analgesia observed in either groups. Data obtained and statistical evaluation done. Results: 286 patients enrolled from age 15-75 years with mean age of 40.2 years. Among 286 patients, 161 were male and 125 were female patients. Both groups A and B having 143 patients each. Analysis showed that tramadol has superiority over nalbuphine and need of analgesia is more in patient given nalbuphine (118 vs 31) as maintenance analgesic agent in post-operative period after PCNL. Conclusion: This study showed that tramadol has superiority over nalbuphine for analgesia after PCNL.

scholarly journals Preoperative Anxiety and Postoperative Pain in Patients With Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Li-Jun Hao ◽  
Xiao-Lai Hou ◽  
Ya-Ling Wu ◽  
Lu-Shi Jing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy ◽  
Preoperative Anxiety ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: This study was designed to investigate preoperative anxiety situations and postoperative pain degree in Chinese patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy and to analyze the related factors of preoperative anxiety and the correlation between preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain to provide a reference for effective postoperative analgesia management.Methods: A total of 100 female patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy were enrolled in this study and randomly divided into two groups (n = 50, each). In group A, the patients were treated with dexmedetomidine and sufentanil for postoperative analgesia. In group B, the patients were treated with sufentanil alone for postoperative analgesia. All patients were evaluated with a self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) 1 day before the operation. The patients’ pain was evaluated using the numerical rating scale (NRS) 1 day after the operation, and data were recorded.Results: In these 100 patients, the highest preoperative SAS score was 48, and the average score was 40.99 ± 4.55 points, which is higher than the norm in China. There were significant differences in preoperative SAS scores among patients with different occupations and previous surgical experience (P &lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in SAS scores among patients with different education levels (P &gt; 0.05). The postoperative NRS score of group A was significantly higher than that of group B, and the difference was statistically significant (P &lt; 0.05). The correlation coefficients between SAS scores and NRS scores in groups A and B were 0.836 and 0.870, respectively, presenting with a significantly positive correlation.Conclusion: Preoperative anxiety is an important predictor of postoperative pain. Patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy have preoperative anxiety. The degree of anxiety is influenced by the occupation and previous operation experience of the patients, and patients with higher preoperative anxiety have greater postoperative pain. In addition, we should not neglect the management of postoperative pain because of the small trauma of laparoscopic surgery, and dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil can improve the postoperative analgesic effect.

scholarly journals Dispositivos interespinosos en discectomías lumbares primarias. ¿Favorecen la recurrencia de la hernia de discos? [Interspinous device in primary lumbar discectomy. Does it favor the recurrence of disc herniation?]

2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-111
Author(s):  
Joint Halley Guimbard Pérez ◽  
Mariano Pomba ◽  
Gustavo Alejandro González ◽  
Nicolás Ortiz
Keyword(s):  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Herniated Disc ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Interspinous Spacers ◽  
Group B ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Lost To Follow Up

Objetivo: Evaluar si la colocación de los dispositivos interespinosos siliconados tipo DIAM favorecen una tasa más alta de recidiva de la hernia discal homolateral clínica y por imágenes comparada con la discectomía pura.Materiales y Métodos: Se realizó un estudio prospectivo, observacional, aleatorizado desde mayo de 2009 hasta mayo de 2013, en nuestro Centro. Se evaluó a 123 pacientes, 3 se perdieron en el seguimiento; l muestra incluyó 120 sujetos. Todos fueron operados por el mismo equipo quirúrgico. Se formaron dos grupos: grupo A: discectomía más colocación de dispositivo interespinoso siliconado, 30 pacientes (16 mujeres y 14 hombres), con mayor frecuencia L4-L5 (27 pacientes, 90%) y grupo B: discectomías puras, 90 pacientes (53 mujeres y 37 hombres) con más frecuencia L4 y L5 (72 pacientes, 80%).Resultados: Seis de los pacientes del grupo A (20%) tuvieron una recidiva clínica y por imágenes, y 3 (10%) fueron operados nuevamente; en el grupo B, hubo 4 recidivas discales (4,4%), uno fue operado nuevamente (1,1%). Se hallaron diferencias significativas en las tasas de recidiva y reintervención entre los grupos (p = 0,0073 y p = 0,0188, respectivamente).Conclusiones: Los beneficios de los dispositivos interespinosos para tratar el canal estrecho lumbar secundario a hernia de disco son controvertidos, pero en nuestro estudio, se halló una diferencia significativa según el grupo. Al mantener el movimiento del segmento y cambiar ligeramente las cargas fisiológicas aumentarían la tasa de recidiva discal; no obstante, son necesarios estudios con mayor evidencia científica para corroborar estas tendencias. AbstractObjective: The objective of this study was to evaluate if discectomy with placement of an interspinous silicon DIAM spacer is associated with a different rate of clinical and radiographic ipsilateral disc herniation recurrence than discectomy alone.Methods: A prospective, observational,randomized study was performed from May 2009 to May 2013 at XXXXX. Of the 123 patients included in the study, 3 were lost to follow-up, leaving 120 patients for data analysis. All patients were operated on by the same surgical team. Patients received one of two types of treatment. Group A consisted of 30 patients (16 women and 14 ment) who underwent discectomy with placement of an interspinous silicone DIAM spacer. Group B was composed of 90 patients (53 women and 37 men) who received discectomy alone.Results: Discectomy at L4-L5 was the most common level, occurring in 90% (27) Group A patients and 80% (72) Group B patients. Group A demonstrated clinical and radiographic disc herniation recurrence in 6/30 (20%) of patients. Disc herniation recurrence developed in 4/90 (4.4%) Group B patients. One patient underwent reoperation (1.1%). Both recurrence and reoperation was significantly higher in Group A (p = 0.007 and p = 0.019, respectively).Conclusions: The benefits of interespinosos devices for the treatment of the lumbar spinal stenosis secondary to herniated disc while they are controversial in the present study showed significant difference according to the Group. In this study, patients that underwent discectomy and interspinous spaceer placement had higher reoperation and recurrence rates than discectomy patients that did not receive an interspinous spacer. Interspinous spacers may increase the rate of disc herniation by maintaining movement at the level of prior disc herniation and changing the physiologic load. More studies are needed to corroborate and evaluate these trends.

scholarly journals Efficacy of laparoscopic guided transversus abdominis plane block in post operative analgesia requirement in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 925
Author(s):  
Hanuman Ram Khoja ◽  
Dhanush Kumar Kunchagi ◽  
Praveen Kumar Joshi ◽  
Prabha Om
Keyword(s):  
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Tap Block ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Analgesia Requirement ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background: Minimal invasive surgery has many advantages. In order to maintain and control  pain, one of the most effective technique is Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block technique. Aim of the study was to demonstrate the efficacy of laparoscopic guided transversus abdominis plane block in post-operative analgesia requirement in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods: It was a hospital based prospective interventional study. Sample size was calculated at 0.05 α error and 80% study power assuming mean difference of VAS score between TAP block +/A group  and TAP block- /B group is 1 and standard deviation of VAS score 1.3 among patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Results: A total of 60 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean age of group A was 48.56 years and for group B was 43.53 years. In group A 80% patients were females and for group B 83.3% patients were females. There was significant difference in VAS score at immediate post operation, at 1 hour, at 6 hours, at 18 hours and at 24 hours as p value was <0.0001 for all these groups. The mean VAS score was recorded less in group A at all the time duration compared to group B.Conclusions: With advantages like maximum safety, efficacy, potential for lower visceral injury risk and shorter operational time and other numerous advantages (decreased analgesic requirements, etc.)  laparoscopic-guided TAP block counts as an ideal abdominal field block in the patients.

Comparative Study between the Use of Self-Fixating Mesh and Non Self-Fixating Mesh in Laprascopic Inguinal Hernia Repair Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Technique

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E F Ebied ◽  
A A Khalil ◽  
A I I Soliman
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernioplasty ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background Hernia is a common problem of the modern world with an incidence ranging from 5%-7%. Of all groin hernias, around 75% are inguinal hernias. Recently with advancement in laparoscopy, endoscopic repairs seem to offer better quality of life, decreasing hospital stay and early return to work. Aim of the Work To compare between self fixating mesh and non self fixating mesh in laproscopic inguinal hernia repair transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach as regards intraoperative time, complications, postoperative pain, return to normal activity and incidence of recurrence. Patients and Methods This study was conducted on 30 adult patients presenting with inguinal hernias. They were divided into 2 equal groups of 15 patients each. The first group (A): includes fifteen patients and was operated upon by a Laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal inguinal hernioplasty technique using self -gripping (SGM group) (Parietex ProGrip] Laparoscopic (PPL) meshes), while the second group (B): includes fifteen patients and were operated upon by a Laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal inguinal hernioplasty technique with non-self fixating mesh. Results The postoperative pain assessment at 24 hours and 4 weeks shows that the mean VAS score for GROUP A was (3.70 ± 1.72) and for GROUP B (3.90 ± 1.25) while after 1 month duration follow up, the mean VAS score was (1.25 ± 0.79) for Group A and (1.20 ± 0.77) for Group B with no difference between the two groups confirming the atraumatic nature of the self gripping mesh. Conclusion After this comparative study, both mesh fixation with absorpable tacks and fixation using SGM approaches are similarly effective in terms of operative time, the incidence of recurrence, complications and chronic pain coinciding with all the available literature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document