scholarly journals Return to Sport After Ankle Syndesmotic Injury: A Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seline Y. Vancolen ◽  
Ibrahim Nadeem ◽  
Nolan S. Horner ◽  
Herman Johal ◽  
Bashar Alolabi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Syndesmotic Injury ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Pertinent Data

Context: Ankle syndesmotic injuries present a significant challenge for athletes due to prolonged disability and recovery periods. The optimal management of these injuries and rates of return to sport in athletes remains unclear. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate return to sport for athletes after ankle syndesmotic injuries. Data Source: The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched for relevant studies from database inception to January 15, 2017, and pertinent data were abstracted. Study Selection: Only studies reporting return-to-sport rates after ankle syndesmotic injuries were included. Study Design: Systematic review. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Data Extraction: Two reviewers extracted data from the included studies, which were stored in a standardized collection form (Microsoft Excel). Recorded data included demographics (eg, author, year of publication, study design), descriptive statistics (eg, patient age, percentage male, number of athletes, sample size), and outcomes (eg, time to return to sport, proportion of those who returned to sport, the self-reported questionnaire the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score). Results: A total of 10 studies and 312 patients with ankle syndesmotic injuries were included in this systematic review. The rate of return to preinjury or any injury level of sport after ankle syndesmotic injuries was 93.8% ± 1.2% and 97.6% ± 1.5%, respectively, for the corresponding 7 and 3 studies that reported this characteristic. The mean time to return to sport was 46.4 days (range, 15.4-70 days), with 55.2 ± 15.8 and 41.7 ± 9.8 days for operative and nonoperative management, respectively. Conclusion: This systematic review found a high rate of return to any as well as preinjury level of sport after ankle syndesmotic injury in both operative and nonoperative treatment groups. However, further high-level studies are required to compare operative and nonoperative treatment groups associated with return to sport after ankle syndesmotic injury.

scholarly journals Outcomes and Return to Sport After Pectoralis Major Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Yu ◽  
Cindy Zhang ◽  
Nolan Horner ◽  
Olufemi R. Ayeni ◽  
Timothy Leroux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Pectoralis Major ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Level Of Evidence

Context: Pectoralis major tendon ruptures are becoming increasingly common due to the growing prevalence of active lifestyles. Studies investigating the efficacy of pectoralis major tendon repair have limited sample sizes and offer mixed results, while existing reviews do not explore postoperative activity outcomes for patients. Objective: To summarize and synthesize the clinical outcomes and rate of return to activity after isolated pectoralis major tendon repair. Data Sources: Four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and CINAHL) were searched from database inception through March 7, 2018. Study Selection: Studies reporting outcomes of isolated pectoralis major tendon repair for pectoralis major tendon rupture were included. Study Design: Systematic review. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Data Extraction: Data including patient demographics, intervention details, and clinical outcomes were extracted. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated. Results: Of 2332 retrieved articles, 18 studies were included, with a total of 536 patients. A majority (90%; 134/149) of patients undergoing pectoralis major tendon repair successfully returned to sport at a mean 6.1 ± 1.7 months postsurgery, of which 74% (95/128) successfully returned to their preinjury level of sport. The majority (95%; 269/284) of patients returned to work at a mean 6.9 ± 1 months. Postsurgically, 81% (83/102) of patients experienced complete pain relief after the surgery, and 19% (21/109) had cosmetic complaints after pectoralis major repair. Of the 10 studies that reported complications, 18% (75/423) of patients had postoperative complications, including reruptures and wound infections; 7% (30/423) of patients required reoperation for their complications. Conclusion: Pectoralis major tendon repair is an effective treatment that results in a high rate of return to sport and work, pain relief, and improved cosmetic appearance, albeit with a significant rate of complication. The evidence supporting all outcomes was limited by the rarity of the injury, the variable surgical techniques, and outcome assessment criteria.

scholarly journals Return to Sport After Coracoid Transfer in Athletes With Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 402-408
Author(s):  
Georgina Glogovac ◽  
Adam P. Schumaier ◽  
Brian M. Grawe
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Coracoid Transfer ◽  
Patient Reported

Context: Recurrent shoulder instability in young athletes can lead to a spectrum of soft tissue and bony lesions that can be bothersome and/or disabling. Coracoid transfer is a treatment option for athletes with recurrent instability. Objective: To report the rate of return to sport for athletes after coracoid transfer. Data Sources: An electronic search of the literature was performed using the PubMed (MEDLINE) and Cochrane Databases (1966-2018). Study Selection: Studies were included if they evaluated return to sport after treatment with coracoid transfer at a minimum 1-year follow-up. Study Design: Systematic review. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Data Extraction: Data were extracted by 2 authors and included study design, level of evidence, patient demographics (number, age, sex), procedure performed, duration of clinical follow-up, rate of return to sport, patient-reported outcome measures, reoperations, and complications. Results: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The rate of return to sport at any level ranged from 80% to 100% in all but 1 study (38%), and the rate of return to the previous level of play ranged from 56% to 95% in all but 1 study (16%). Patients returned to sport at an average of 3.2 to 8.1 months. The average patient-reported outcome scores ranged from 78% to 94% (Rowe), 223.6 to 534.3 (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index), and 75% to 90% (subjective shoulder value). The rate of postoperative dislocation ranged from 0% to 14%, and the reoperation rate ranged from 1.4% to 13%. Conclusion: There was a high early rate of return to sport in patients who underwent coracoid transfer for anterior shoulder instability, although patients did not reliably return to the same level of play. The procedure had very favorable outcomes for treatment of instability, with low rates of recurrent dislocation and reoperation.

scholarly journals Return to Sport After Proximal Hamstring Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 232596711985321 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Belk ◽  
Matthew J. Kraeutler ◽  
Omer Mei-Dan ◽  
Darby A. Houck ◽  
Eric C. McCarty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Hamstring Tendon ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Proximal Hamstring

Background: Previous studies have evaluated functional outcomes and return-to-sport rates after proximal hamstring tendon (HT) repair. Purpose: To systematically review the literature in an effort to evaluate return-to-sport rates after proximal HT repair. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify studies that evaluated postoperative lower extremity function and return-to-sport rates in patients after proximal HT repair. Search terms used were “hamstring,” “repair,” “return to sport,” and “return to play.” Patients were assessed based on return to sport, return to preinjury activity level, type of HT tear (complete or partial), and interval from injury to surgery. Patients were also divided into subgroups depending on timing of the surgical intervention: early, <1 month; delayed, 1 to 6 months; and late, >6 months from the time of injury. Results: Sixteen studies (one level 2, five level 3, ten level 4) met the inclusion criteria, including 374 patients with a complete proximal HT tear (CT group) and 93 patients with a partial proximal HT tear (PT group), with a mean follow-up of 2.9 years. Overall, 93.8% of patients (438/467) returned to sport, including 93.0% (348/374) in the CT group and 96.8% (90/93) in the PT group ( P = .18). The mean time to return to sport was 5.7 months, and 83.5% of patients (330/395) returned to their preinjury activity level. The early group demonstrated the greatest rate of return to sport at 94.4% (186/197) as well as the quickest time to return at a mean of 4.8 months, although this was not found to be statistically significant. Conclusion: Over 90% of patients undergoing repair of a complete or partial proximal HT tear can be expected to return to sport regardless of the tear type. Early surgical interventions of these injuries may be associated with a quicker return to sport, although the rate of return to sport does not differ based on timing of the surgical intervention.

scholarly journals Return to Sport After Surgical Management of Posterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110111
Author(s):  
Kyle Gouveia ◽  
Jeffrey Kay ◽  
Muzammil Memon ◽  
Nicole Simunovic ◽  
Asheesh Bedi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Posterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Rates Of Return ◽  
Posterior Shoulder

Background: Posterior shoulder instability accounts for a small proportion of all shoulder instability, although it can affect athletes of all types, from contact to overhead athletes. Surgical treatment is quite successful in these patients; however, the literature reports a wide range of rates of return to sport. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to determine the return-to-sport rates after surgical stabilization for posterior shoulder instability. It was hypothesized that patients would experience a high rate of return to sport. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Embase, PubMed, and MEDLINE were searched for relevant literature from database inception until April 2020, and studies were screened by 2 reviewers independently and in duplicate for studies reporting rates of return to sport after surgical management of posterior shoulder instability. Demographic data as well as data on return to sport and functional outcomes were recorded. A meta-analysis of proportions was used to combine the rates of return to sport using a random effects model. A risk of bias was assessed for all included studies. Results: Overall, 32 studies met inclusion criteria and comprised 1100 patients (1153 shoulders) with a mean age of 22.8 years (range, 11-65) and a mean follow-up of 43.2 months (range, 10-228). The pooled rate of return to any level of sport was 88% (95% CI, 84%-92%; I2 = 68.7%). In addition, the pooled rate of return to the preinjury level was 68% (95% CI, 60%-76%; I2 = 79%). Moreover, the pooled return-to-sport rate for contact athletes was 94% (95% CI, 90%-97%; I2 = 0%), while for throwing athletes it was 88% (95% CI, 83%-92%; I2 = 0%). Conclusion: Surgical management of posterior shoulder instability resulted in a high rate of return to sport, as well as significant pain reduction and functional improvement in most patients. However, only two-thirds of athletes can return to their preinjury levels of sport.

Performance and Return to Sport After Tommy John Surgery Among Major League Baseball Position Players

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 1720-1726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Jack ◽  
Matthew B. Burn ◽  
Kyle R. Sochacki ◽  
Patrick C. McCulloch ◽  
David M. Lintner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major League Baseball ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Position Change ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Valgus Stress ◽  
Postoperative Performance ◽  
Career Length ◽  
Major League ◽  
Tommy John

Background: The anterior bundle of the medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) is the primary restraint to valgus stress at the elbow and is often injured among overhead throwing athletes. Despite prevention strategies, injuries to the elbow UCL are on the rise. Purpose: To determine (1) the return-to-sport (RTS) rate of Major League Baseball (MLB) position players after elbow medial UCL reconstruction, (2) postoperative career length and games per season, (3) pre- and postoperative performance, (4) postoperative performance versus matched control players, and (5) whether position players changed positions after UCL reconstruction. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: MLB players who underwent elbow UCL reconstruction were identified (cases). Demographic and performance data were collected for each player. Matched controls were identified. RTS in MLB was defined as playing in at least 1 MLB game after UCL reconstruction. Comparisons between case and control groups and pre- and postoperative time points were made via paired samples Student t tests. Results: Thirty-three players (34 surgical procedures) were identified with a mean ± SD age of 30.2 ± 4.2 years and a mean experience in the MLB of 6.3 ± 3.9 years at the time of surgery. Twenty-eight players (84.8%) were able to RTS in MLB at a mean 336.9 ± 121.8 days. However, players ≥30 years old demonstrated a significantly lower RTS rate (53.3%) than players <30 years old (89.4%; P < .05). Catchers had a significantly shorter postoperative career length (2.8 ± 1.8 years) versus matched controls (6.1 ± 1.9 years; P < .05). Outfielders had a significantly lower wins above replacement postoperatively (0.8 ± 0.7) versus preoperatively (1.5 ± 1.1; P < .05). There were no performance differences between cases and matched controls. Twelve players (48%) returned to a different position postoperatively. Conclusion: The RTS rate for MLB position players after elbow UCL reconstruction is similar to that of pitchers. Catchers had a significantly shorter career length than that of matched controls. Outfielders performed worse postoperatively versus preoperatively. There is a high rate of position change after Tommy John surgery for infielders and outfielders.

scholarly journals Return to Sport after Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1576
Author(s):  
Rocco Papalia ◽  
Mauro Ciuffreda ◽  
Erika Albo ◽  
Chiara De Andreis ◽  
Lorenzo Alirio Diaz Balzani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Cochrane Library

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the rate of return to sport in elderly patients who underwent anatomic (ATSA) and reverse (RTSA) total shoulder arthroplasty, to assess postoperative pain and functional outcomes and to give an overview of postoperative rehabilitation protocols. A systematic search in Pubmed-Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was carried out to identify eligible randomized clinical trials, observational studies, or case series that evaluated the rate of return to sport after RTSA or ATSA. Six retrospective studies, five case series, and one prospective cohort study were included in this review. The overall rate of return to sport was 82% (95% CI 0.76–0.88, p < 0.01). Patients undergoing ATSA returned at a higher rate (90%) (95% CI 0.80–0.99, p < 0.01) compared to RTSA (77%) (95% CI 0.69–0.85, p < 0.01). Moreover, the results showed that patients returned to sport at the same or a higher level in 75% of cases. Swimming had the highest rate of return (84%), followed by fitness (77%), golf (77%), and tennis (69%). Thus, RTSA and ATSA are effective to guarantee a significative rate of return to sport in elderly patients. A slightly higher rate was found for the anatomic implant.

Athletes experience a high rate of return to sport following hip arthroscopy

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 3066-3104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muzammil Memon ◽  
Jeffrey Kay ◽  
Philip Hache ◽  
Nicole Simunovic ◽  
Joshua D. Harris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Rate Of Return

scholarly journals Injectable Ketorolac and Corticosteroid Use in Athletes: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 521-527
Author(s):  
Timothy R. Jelsema ◽  
Anthony C. Tam ◽  
James L. Moeller
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Football Game ◽  
Early Return ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Intramuscular Ketorolac

Context: The use of injectable medications to help athletes quickly return to the field of play after injury is common. Understanding the effects and risks of these medications will help providers make informed decisions regarding their use in this patient population. Objective: To evaluate the utilization, efficacy, and adverse effects of injectable ketorolac and corticosteroids in athletes. Data Sources: This systematic review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A systematic search of the literature was performed using multiple databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov). Secondary references were appraised for relevant articles. No randomized controlled trials or other prospective studies were identified. Articles included retrospective database reviews and physician survey studies. Study Selection: A total of 6 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers with a third consulted in the case of disagreement, which was not needed. Study Design: Systematic review. Level of Evidence: Level 5. Data Extraction: Two reviewers recorded rate of use, effectiveness of treatment, and reported side effect data. Results: Most studies centered around the football athlete, either professional or collegiate. Professional football game day use of intramuscular ketorolac declined from 93.3% (28/30) in 2002 to 48% in 2016. Collegiate football game day use of intramuscular ketorolac declined from 62% in 2008 to 26% in 2016. Game day corticosteroid injection was far lower than ketorolac usage. Both medications were reported to be effective with few adverse events. Conclusion: Use of injectable ketorolac is common but declining in professional and college football. Pain control efficacy is good, and risk of adverse events is low. The incidence of injectable corticosteroid use in athletes is unknown. Use of injectable corticosteroids in athletes allows for early return to sport activities with no reported complications.

scholarly journals When to Abandon the Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 425-430
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Levy ◽  
Nathan L. Grimm ◽  
Robert A. Arciero
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Humeral Head ◽  
Measurement Techniques ◽  
Glenoid Bone Loss ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Glenohumeral Instability ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

Context: Bone loss is a major factor in determining surgical choice in patients with anterior glenohumeral instability. Although bone loss has been described, there is no consensus on glenoid, humeral head, and bipolar bone loss limits for which arthroscopic-only management with Bankart repair can be performed. Objective: To provide guidelines for selecting a more complex repair or reconstruction (in lieu of arthroscopic-only Bankart repair) in the setting of glenohumeral instability based on available literature. Data Sources: An electronic search of the literature for the period from 2000 to 2019 was performed using PubMed (MEDLINE). Study Selection: Studies were included if they quantified bone loss (humeral head or glenoid) in the setting of anterior instability treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair. Study Design: Systematic review. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Data Extraction: Study design, level of evidence, patient demographics, follow-up, recurrence rates, and measures of bone loss (glenoid, humeral head, bipolar). Results: A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 10 measured glenoid bone loss, 5 measured humeral head bone loss, and 2 measured “tracking” without explicit measurement of humeral head bone loss. Measurement techniques for glenoid and humeral head bone loss varied widely. Recommendations for maximum glenoid bone loss for arthroscopic repair were largely <15% of glenoid width in recent studies. Recommendations regarding humeral head loss were more variable (many authors providing only qualitative descriptions) with increasing attention on glenohumeral tracking. Conclusion: It is essential that a standardized method of glenoid and humeral head bone loss measurements be performed preoperatively to assess which patients will have successful stabilization after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Glenoid bone loss should be <15%, and humeral head lesions should be “on track” if an arthroscopic-only Bankart is planned. If there is greater bone loss, adjunct or open procedures should be performed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document