Parental smoking and the risk of congenital heart defects in offspring: An updated meta-analysis of observational studies

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1284-1293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijuan Zhao ◽  
Lizhang Chen ◽  
Tubao Yang ◽  
Lesan Wang ◽  
Tingting Wang ◽  
...  

Objective Although previous reviews confirmed maternal active smoking was significantly associated with risk of fetal congenital heart defects (CHDs), association between maternal passive smoking and paternal smoking and risk of CHDs is inconclusive nowadays; furthermore, a complete overview is lacking. A meta-analysis of observational studies was conducted to assess the risk of CHDs associated with maternal active and passive smoking and paternal smoking. Methods Seven electronic databases were searched for qualified research up to June 2018. We summarized study characteristics and the summary risk estimates were calculated using either the random-effect model or fixed-effect model. Sensitivity and subgroup analysis were carried out to identify the potential heterogeneity moderators. Results One hundred and twenty-five studies involving 137,574 CHDs cases in 8,770,837 study participants were included. Overall, maternal active (risk ratio (RR) = 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16–1.34; p < 0.01) and passive (RR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.81–2.77; p < 0.01) smoking as well as paternal active smoking (RR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.48–2.06; p < 0.01) were significantly associated with CHDs risk. For specific CHD subtypes, our study showed that maternal active smoking was significantly associated with risk of atrial septal defect (RR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.02–1.59; p = 0.03) and right ventricular outflow tract obstruction (RR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.04–1.97; p = 0.03). Relevant heterogeneity moderators have been identified by subgroup analysis. Sensitivity analysis yielded consistent results. Conclusion Maternal active smoking, maternal passive smoking as well as paternal smoking all increased the risk of CHDs in offspring. Preventing parental smoking during peri-pregnancy is a priority for CHDs prevention.

Author(s):  
Ali Ghanchi ◽  
Neil Derridj ◽  
Damien Bonnet ◽  
Nathalie Bertille ◽  
Laurent J. Salomon ◽  
...  

Newborns with congenital heart defects tend to have a higher risk of growth restriction, which can be an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes. To date, a systematic review of the relation between congenital heart defects (CHD) and growth restriction at birth, most commonly estimated by its imperfect proxy small for gestational age (SGA), has not been conducted. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the proportion of children born with CHD that are small for gestational age (SGA). Methods: The search was carried out from inception until 31 March 2019 on Pubmed and Embase databases. Studies were screened and selected by two independent reviewers who used a predetermined data extraction form to obtain data from studies. Bias was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. The database search identified 1783 potentially relevant publications, of which 38 studies were found to be relevant to the study question. A total of 18 studies contained sufficient data for a meta-analysis, which was done using a random effects model. Results: The pooled proportion of SGA in all CHD was 20% (95% CI 16%–24%) and 14% (95% CI 13%–16%) for isolated CHD. Proportion of SGA varied across different CHD ranging from 30% (95% CI 24%–37%) for Tetralogy of Fallot to 12% (95% CI 7%–18%) for isolated atrial septal defect. The majority of studies included in the meta-analysis were population-based studies published after 2010. Conclusion: The overall proportion of SGA in all CHD was 2-fold higher whereas for isolated CHD, 1.4-fold higher than the expected proportion in the general population. Although few studies have looked at SGA for different subtypes of CHD, the observed variability of SGA by subtypes suggests that growth restriction at birth in CHD may be due to different pathophysiological mechanisms.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e0130681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaomei Yang ◽  
Huizhen Qiu ◽  
Pengfei Qu ◽  
Ruo Zhang ◽  
Lingxia Zeng ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document