Theoretical and Practical Knowledge of Metered-Dose Inhalers and Spacer Device Among Health Care Providers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 261-265
Author(s):  
Emadia Mohammed Alaki ◽  
Aziza Abdullah Donques ◽  
Mohammed Al Ghobain
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 260-260
Author(s):  
Allen A. Adinoff

This study confirms that a large percentage of patients use MDI improperly. It also demonstrates a significant lack of understanding by health care providers of the proper use of MDI. Furthermore, this study supports the use of respiratory care practitioners in the outpatient setting, since they were the most proficient among all the health care providers in the proper use of MDI.


1995 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 308-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey S Jones ◽  
Christopher P Holstege ◽  
Robert Riekse ◽  
Lynn White ◽  
Theresa Bergquist

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 587-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nidaa A. Bajow ◽  
Wajdan I. AlAssaf ◽  
Ameera A. Cluntun

AbstractIntroductionUnacceptable practices of health care providers during disasters have been observed because they work outside the scope of their daily practices and have inadequate training. A greater need for the involvement of health professionals in disaster management has been noted in Saudi Arabia. This study evaluates the efficacy of a training course in prehospital major incident management for health care providers in Saudi Arabia.MethodsAn interactive course for general principles in prehospital major incident management was developed with domains and core competencies. The course was designed according to the local context and was based on international standards. It was piloted over four days at the Officers Club of the Ministry of Interior (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) and was sponsored by Mohammed Bin Naif Medical Center, King Fahd Security College in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The participants (n=29) were from different disciplines from main government health facilities in Riyadh. They completed a pre-test and a post-test.ResultsThe overall score was 55.1% on the pre-test and 68.4% on the post-test (Wilcoxon test for paired samples, P <.05). Three out of the four domains had significant difference between pre- and post-test results, as well as the overall total knowledge.Conclusion:Conducting inter-disciplinary and competency-based disaster medicine courses for health care providers can augment appropriate disaster preparedness for major incidents in Saudi Arabia.BajowNA,AlAssafWI,CluntunAA.Course in prehospital major incidents management for health care providers in Saudi Arabia.Prehosp Disaster Med.2018;33(6):587–595.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-166
Author(s):  
Najla J. Alhraiwil ◽  
Razan A. AlYoussef ◽  
Nora K. AlShlash ◽  
Samar A. Amer ◽  
Nashwa M. Radwan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Baraka ◽  
Hassan Alsultan ◽  
Taha Alsalman ◽  
Hussain Alaithan ◽  
Md. Ashraful Islam ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Infections result from invasions of an organism into body tissues leading to diseases and complications that might eventually lead to death. Inappropriate use of antimicrobials has led to development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) which has been associated with increased mortality, morbidity and health costs. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs are designed to ensure appropriate selections of an effective antimicrobial drugs and optimizing antibiotic use to minimize antibiotic resistance by implementing certain policies, strategies and guidelines. The aim of this study was to investigate practitioners’ perceptions regarding AMS implementation and to identify challenges and facilitators of these programs execution. Methods Cross-sectional study among health care providers in Eastern province of Saudi Arabia Hospitals. The data was collected using a survey including questions about demographic data and information about clinicians’ (physicians, pharmacists and nurses) previous experience with AMS and prescribing of antibiotics, the level of knowledge and attitudes regarding AMS programs’ implementation. Results More than 50% of clinicians (N = 184) reported lack of awareness of AMS programs and their components, whereas 71.2% do not have previous AMS experience. The majority of clinicians (72.3%) noticed increasing number of AMR infections over the past 5 years and (69.6%) were involved in care of patients with an antibiotic-resistant infection. Around 77.2% of respondents reported that formulary management can be helpful for AMS practice and majority of respondents (79.9%) reported that the availability of pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility testing can be helpful for AMS. Major barriers to AMS implementation identified were lack of internal policy/guidelines and specialized AMS information resources. Lack of administrative awareness about AMS programs; lack of personnel, time limitation, limited training opportunities, lack of confidence, financial issue or limited funding and lack of specialized AMS information resources were also reported 65.8%, 62.5%, 60.9%, 73.9%, 50%, 54.3 and 74.5%, respectively. Conclusion Our study identified comprehensive education and training needs for health care providers about AMS programs. Furthermore, it appears that internal policy and guidelines need revision to ensure that the health care providers work consistently with AMS. Future research must focus on the benefit of implementing AMS as many hospitals are not implementing AMS as revealed by the clinicians. We recommend policy makers and concerned health authorities to consider the study findings into account to optimize AMS implementation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0 ◽  
Author(s):  
AymanH Jawadi ◽  
LauraI Alolayan ◽  
ThurayaS Alsumai ◽  
MohammadH Aljawadi ◽  
Winnie Philip ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document