scholarly journals Research Insights About Risk Governance

SAGE Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 215824401668023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Therese R. Viscelli ◽  
Mark S. Beasley ◽  
Dana R. Hermanson
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Boards Of Directors ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Holistic Approach ◽  
Risk Governance ◽  
Management Processes ◽  
Enterprise Risk ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Oversight

In recent years, expectations for increased risk governance have been placed explicitly on boards of directors. In response, boards are being held responsible for not only understanding and approving management’s risk management processes, but they are also being held responsible for assessing the risks identified by those processes as part of overseeing management’s pursuit of value. These increasing responsibilities have led a number of organizations to adopt enterprise risk management (ERM) as a holistic approach to risk management that extends beyond traditional silo-based risk management techniques. As boards, often through their audit committee, consider management’s implementation of ERM as part of the board’s risk oversight, a number of questions emerge that can be informed by academic research related to ERM. This article summarizes findings from ERM research to provide insights related to the board’s risk governance responsibilities. We also identify a number of research questions that warrant further analysis by governance scholars. It is our hope that this article will spawn varying types of research about ERM and corporate governance.

scholarly journals Enterprise risk management: Factors associated with effective implementation

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 175-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Godson K. Mensah ◽  
Werner D. Gottwald
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Holistic Approach ◽  
Enterprise Risk Management ◽  
Strong Positive Correlation ◽  
Management Support ◽  
Enterprise Risk ◽  
Correlational Approach ◽  
Management Professionals

Risk management is undergoing a great change, as organizations shift from the traditional and compartmental to an enterprise wide approach. Consequently, enterprise risk management (ERM) is gaining global attention among risk management professionals and academics. The demand for the adoption of ERM has led to several companies embracing it, yet its implementation has become challenging. Research shows that ERM approach emphasizes a holistic approach for assessing and evaluating the risks that an organization faces as against the “silo” approach of the traditional methods. The extant literature shows that through the reduction of the risk that an organization faces, ERM is capable of improving the performance and value. The study used a non-experimental correlational approach to explore the relationship between the presence of a chief risk officer (CRO) and an audit committee (AC), and the support of top management (TM) in relation to the implementation of ERM. A survey instrument was provided to self-identified risk-management professionals who are members of Survey Monkey Audience Service database. The target sample frame requested for analysis using a power of .95 was (n = 119). However, the final number analyzed was (n = 134). Frequencies and percentages were conducted on the demographic survey items and regression and correlational analyses were also performed. The study findings show that there was a significant relationship between the role of a CRO, the presence of an AC, and the support of TM and the level of ERM deployment. The study also found significant correlations between management support level and CRO, and AC. In addition, a much strong positive correlation was noted between the presence of a CRO and an AC.

scholarly journals Managers’ Support – A Key Driver behind Enterprise Risk Management Maturity

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (s1) ◽  
pp. 25-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danijela Miloš Sprčić ◽  
Antonija Kožul ◽  
Ena Pecina
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Economies Of Scale ◽  
System Development ◽  
Holistic Approach ◽  
Enterprise Risk Management ◽  
Management Framework ◽  
Risk Management Framework ◽  
Management Processes ◽  
Enterprise Risk ◽  
System Maturity

Abstract Severe consequences of the global fi nancial crisis resulted in re-thinking the risk management processes and approaches, highlighting the need for a comprehensive risk management framework. Consequently, more and more companies are moving away from the Traditional “silo-based” Risk Management (TRM) to a more holistic approach known as Enterprise Risk Management (ERM). This paper presents results of both exploratory and empirical research. First, we develop ERM Index that measures maturity of ERM process within the company. Then, we present empirical results on the level of maturity and determinants of risk management system development in listed Croatian companies. Research indicates low levels of ERM development: even 38 per cent of analysed companies have no elements of ERM system, from which 22 per cent do not manage corporate risks at all. Except the company’s size supported by the economies of scale argument, managers’ support is the most important determinant of ERM system maturity in Croatian companies.

A theory of enterprise risk management

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 565-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Håkan Jankensgård
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Boards Of Directors ◽  
Enterprise Risk Management ◽  
Risk Governance ◽  
Corporate Risk Management ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Enterprise Risk ◽  
Risk Aggregation ◽  
The Board Of Directors

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop a theory of enterprise risk management (ERM). Design/methodology/approach The method is to develop a theory for ERM based on identifying the general risk management problems that it is supposed to solve and to apply the principle of deduction based on these premises. Findings ERM consists of risk governance, which is a set of mechanisms that deals with the agency problem of risk management and risk aggregation, which is a set of mechanisms that deals with the information problem of risk management. Research limitations/implications The theory, by identifying the central role of the Board of Directors, encourages further research into the capabilities and incentives of directors as determinants of ERM adoption. It also encourages research into how ERM adoption depends on proxies for agency problems of risk management, such as a decentralized company structure. Practical implications The theory encourages Boards of Directors to focus on understanding where the under and over management of risk are likely to be greatest, as opposed to the current practice of mapping a large number of risk factors. Originality/value The theory complements existing theory on corporate risk management, which revolves around the role of external frictions, by focusing on internal frictions in the firm that prevent effective risk management. It is the first work to delineate ERM vis-a-vis existing risk theory.

The Integration of ERM and Strategy: Implications for Corporate Governance

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Therese R. Viscelli ◽  
Dana R. Hermanson ◽  
Mark S. Beasley
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Boards Of Directors ◽  
Implementation Process ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Executive Management ◽  
Strategic Direction ◽  
Strategic Value ◽  
Enterprise Risk ◽  
Leadership Structure ◽  
Risk Oversight

SYNOPSIS Since the early 2000s, expectations have increased for organizations to strengthen corporate governance with enterprise risk management (ERM) processes, with the accounting profession playing a major role in these efforts. The ultimate goal of an effective ERM process is to help boards and senior executives to manage risks in the context of strategy so that the organization is more likely to achieve its key objectives. We conduct semi-structured interviews of 15 ERM champions to provide insights about whether the ERM process is integrated with the strategic-planning and execution processes of the firm. We find that while the decision to launch ERM often is based on a desire for ERM to provide strategic value, the integration of ERM with strategy typically is limited. We then examine the ERM implementation process to identify possible ERM implementation practices limiting ERM's integration with strategy. We find that organizations' (1) culture and approach to preparing for ERM's launch, (2) ERM leadership structure, and (3) management of key risks appear to limit the intersection of ERM and strategy. Our summary of key findings highlights important considerations for boards of directors, executive management, and auditors as they assess the effectiveness of their risk oversight efforts in overseeing the strategic direction of the enterprise.

scholarly journals IMPACT OF GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TOWARDS CORPORATE VALUE WITH ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AS MODERATING VARIABLE (EMPIRICAL STUDY OF FINANCIAL COMPANIES LISTED IN IDX FOR THE PERIOD 2017-2019)

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-98
Author(s):  
Lydia Sibarani ◽  
Herlina Lusmeida
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Enterprise Risk Management ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Corporate Value ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Enterprise Risk ◽  
Multiple Regression Method ◽  
The Impact

Abstract- This research aims to observe and analyze the impact of Good Corporate Governance towards Corporate Value as well as analyzing whether Enterprise Risk Management is able to moderate its impact. Good Corporate Governance is proxied by the presence of Independent Commissioners, Audit Committee, as well as Managerial Ownership. The population of this research includes all financial companies that publish their annual report in Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) over the period of 2017-2019. Data were analyzed using the multiple regression method and the moderated regression analysis. The result of this research found that Independent Commissioners and Audit Committee gives positive and significant impact towards Corporate Value while Managerial Ownership gives negative and insignificant impact towards Corporate Value. Enterprise Risk Management is not able to moderate the impact of Independent Commissioner and Managerial Ownership towards Corporate Value but is able to moderate the impact of the Audit Committee towards Corporate Value. Keywords: Audit Committee; Corporate Value; Corporate Governance; Independent Commissioner; Managerial Ownership

Academic Research on Enterprise Risk Management

2011 ◽  
pp. 419-439
Author(s):  
Subramanian R. Iyer ◽  
Daniel A. Rogers ◽  
Betty J. Simkins
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Enterprise Risk Management ◽  
Enterprise Risk

Auditor Communications with the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors: Policy Recommendations and Opportunities for Future Research

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Cohen ◽  
Lisa Milici Gaynor ◽  
Ganesh Krishnamoorthy ◽  
Arnold M. Wright
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Boards Of Directors ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Reporting Quality ◽  
Academic Community ◽  
Communication Process ◽  
Audit Committees ◽  
Financial Reporting Quality ◽  
Future Research

To contribute to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) project on auditor communications with audit committees and boards of directors, we present in this paper a review of relevant academic literature. We also identify promising future research opportunities for the academic community. We specifically focus on how the communication process may affect overall financial reporting quality, internal controls, control environments, and external auditors' performance, as well as matters that potentially impact financial reporting and should interest the PCAOB (e.g., in the area of management discussion and analysis). We specifically link the findings from academic research to the discussion questions posed by the PCAOB in its 2004 briefing paper. Several potential implications of the findings should also interest standard-setters and regulators addressing issues related to corporate governance and financial reporting quality.

Academic Research on Communications Among External Auditors, the Audit Committee, and the Board: Implications and Recommendations for Practice

2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. A1-A8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Cohen ◽  
Lisa Milici Gaynor ◽  
Ganesh Krishnamoorthy ◽  
Arnold M. Wright
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Boards Of Directors ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Reporting Quality ◽  
Audit Committees ◽  
Financial Reporting Quality ◽  
External Auditors ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Recommendations For Practice

SUMMARY: This article provides a summary of the academic research findings on the attributes of effective audit committees and potential threats to financial reporting quality that should lead to heightened auditor and audit committee sensitivity. The practice implications of this research are then discussed in terms of appropriate communications among auditors, audit committees, and boards of directors.

scholarly journals Does Audit Committee Characteristics Promote Risk Management Practices in Nigerian Listed Firms?

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Ojeka ◽  
Alex Adeboye ◽  
Olajide Dahunsi
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Financial Risk ◽  
Enterprise Risk Management ◽  
Audit Committees ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Enterprise Risk ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
Accounting Expertise

There has been a huge and deluge of risk threatening industries at an unequalled magnitude in recent times. As such, the board of directors and senior executives are increasingly expected to manage their various organizations' risk portfolios, affecting their financial performance. This has led to the assigning of the risk assessment role to the audit committee. The board of directors and its audit committee play an essential function in Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) by building up the right condition or tone-at-the-top. Given the board's responsibilities for representing the interests of shareholders, it plays a vital role in overseeing management's approach to ERM. This study examined the relationship between audit committee characteristics and risk management of some selected listed firms in a developing country like Nigeria. The study used secondary data to describe the dependent variable (financial risk decomposed into credit risk and liquidity risk) and the explanatory variables (decomposed into audit committee accounting expertise, audit committee meetings, audit committee independence and audit committee gender). The study used pair sample t-test, student t-test, Pearson Moment Correlation and random panel data estimator for twenty (20) selected listed firms for 2012-2016. Findings indicate that there is a negative between audit committee accounting expertise and financial risk. This revealed that Accounting Expertise in Audit Committees are likely to involve in activities and practices to curb financial risk. In addition, the Audit committee meeting indicates a negative relationship with credit risk. Audit committee gender and audit committee independence have a negative effect on liquidity risk. Therefore, this study recommends that Audit committees embrace Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) to manage risks effectively across the organization. Risk management processes should be one of the major points of discussion during audit committee meetings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document