scholarly journals Partial Intraoperative Global Alignment and Proportion Scores Do Not Reliably Predict Postoperative Mechanical Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822093543
Author(s):  
Alex S. Ha ◽  
Daniel Y. Hong ◽  
Josephine R. Coury ◽  
Meghan Cerpa ◽  
Griffin Baum ◽  
...  

Study Design: Retrospective radiographic review. Objectives: The Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score allows sagittal plane analysis for deformity patients and may be predictive of mechanical complications. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of predicting mechanical failure based on partial intraoperative GAP (iGAP) scores. Methods: A retrospective radiographic review was performed on 48 deformity patients between July 2015 to January 2017 with a 2-year follow-up. Using the same methodology as the original GAP study, the partial iGAP score was calculated with the sum of the scores for age, relative lumbar lordosis (RLL), and lordosis distribution index (LDI). Therefore, the iGAP score (0-7) was grouped into proportional (0-2), mildly disproportionate (3-5), and severely disproportionate (6-7). Logistic regression was performed to assess the ability of the partial iGAP score to predict postoperative mechanical failure. Results: The mean iGAP for patients with a mechanical failure was 3.54, whereas the iGAP for those without a mechanical failure was 3.46 ( P = .90). The overall mechanical failure rate was 27.1%. The mechanical failures included 8 proximal junctional kyphosis, 7 rod fractures, and 1 rod slippage from the distal end of the construct. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the partial iGAP score was not able to predict postoperative mechanical failure (χ2 = 1.4; P = .49). Conclusion: The iGAP scores for RLL or LDI did not show any significant correlation to postoperative mechanical failure. Ultimately, the proposed partial iGAP score did not predict postoperative mechanical failure and thus, cannot be used as an intraoperative alignment assessment to avoid postoperative mechanical complications.

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. S126-S127
Author(s):  
International Spine Study Group ◽  
Gregory M. Mundis ◽  
Jay D. Turner ◽  
Vedat Deviren ◽  
Juan S. Uribe ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao Zhao ◽  
Beiyu Xu ◽  
Longtao Qi ◽  
Chunde Li ◽  
Zhengrong Yu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD) remains a significant challenge, especially in elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of the S2AI screw technique in the treatment of severe spinal sagittal imbalance with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Methods From January 2015 to December 2018, 23 patients with severe degenerative thoracolumbar kyphosis who underwent placement of S2AI screws for long segment fusion were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into group A (no mechanical complications, 13 cases) and group B (with mechanical complications, 10 cases) according to the occurrence of mechanical complications at the last follow-up. Radiographic parameters were compared between groups preoperatively, 1 month postoperatively, and at the last follow-up. Risk factors for mechanical complications were analyzed. Results The incidence of mechanical complications was 43.5%, and the revision rate was 17.4%. At 1 month postoperatively, sagittal correction was better in group A than in group B (P<0.05). The lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) of both groups at the last follow-up were significantly different from corresponding values at 1 month postoperatively (P<0.05), and the sagittal correction was partially lost. Pearson correlation analysis revealed that the occurrence of mechanical complications was associated with sacral slope (SS), LL, PI-LL, and global alignment and proportion (GAP) score at 1 month postoperatively. Conclusion A high incidence of mechanical complications was observed in long-segment corrective surgery with the S2AI screw technique for severe spinal sagittal imbalance. Inadequate sagittal correction is a risk factor for the development of mechanical complications.


2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-102
Author(s):  
Griffin R. Baum ◽  
Alex S. Ha ◽  
Meghan Cerpa ◽  
Scott L. Zuckerman ◽  
James D. Lin ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe goal of this study was to validate the Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score in a cohort of patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. The GAP score is a novel measure that uses sagittal parameters relative to each patient’s lumbosacral anatomy to predict mechanical complications after ASD surgery. External validation is required.METHODSAdult ASD patients undergoing > 4 levels of posterior fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Six-week postoperative standing radiographs were used to calculate the GAP score, classified into a spinopelvic state as proportioned (P), moderately disproportioned (MD), or severely disproportioned (SD). A chi-square analysis, receiver operating characteristic curve, and Cochran-Armitage analysis were performed to assess the relationship between the GAP score and mechanical complications.RESULTSSixty-seven patients with a mean age of 52.5 years (range 18–75 years) and a mean follow-up of 2.04 years were included. Patients with < 2 years of follow-up were included only if they had an early mechanical complication. Twenty of 67 patients (29.8%) had a mechanical complication. The spinopelvic state breakdown was as follows: P group, 21/67 (31.3%); MD group, 23/67 (34.3%); and SD group, 23/67 (34.3%). Mechanical complication rates were not significantly different among all groups: P group, 19.0%; MD group, 30.3%; and SD group, 39.1% (χ2 = 1.70, p = 0.19). The rates of mechanical complications between the MD and SD groups (30.4% and 39.1%) were less than those observed in the original GAP study (MD group 36.4%–57.1% and SD group 72.7%–100%). Within the P group, the rates in this study were higher than in the original study (19.0% vs 4.0%, respectively).CONCLUSIONSThe authors found no statistically significant difference in the rate of mechanical complications between the P, MD, and SD groups. The current validation study revealed poor generalizability toward the authors’ patient population.


Neurospine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 484-491
Author(s):  
Sung Hyun Noh ◽  
Yoon Ha ◽  
Jeong Yoon Park ◽  
Sung Uk Kuh ◽  
Dong Kyu Chin ◽  
...  

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the prediction rate of the modified Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) scoring system with body mass index and bone mineral density (GAPB) in each GAP of the 3 categories.Methods: Between January 2009 and December 2016, 203 consecutive patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) underwent corrective fusion of more than 4 levels and were followedup for more than 2 years. As a validation of the GAPB, the GAPB was divided into tertiles (Q1, Q2, Q3) for each section of the GAP score. Each patient’s GAP score and GAPB system complication rate were examined.Results: Of the 203 patients, 89 patients (44%) developed mechanical complications after ASD surgery. A GAP score analysis of the patients found that 42 patients were proportioned, 85 patients were moderately disproportioned, and 76 patients were severely disproportioned. Mechanical complications occurred with increasing GAPB in the proportioned group, but were not statistically significant (p = 0.0534). However, mechanical complications occurred in a statistically significant manner in the moderately disproportioned and severely disproportioned groups as GAPB increased (p < 0.001).Conclusion: The GAPB system showed improved predictability for mechanical complications after surgery for ASD in each category of the GAP score.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document