scholarly journals Does the Size or Location of Lumbar Disc Herniation Predict the Need for Operative Treatment?

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822094851
Author(s):  
Srikanth N. Divi ◽  
Heeren S. Makanji ◽  
Christopher K. Kepler ◽  
D. Greg Anderson ◽  
Dhruv K. C. Goyal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Relative Size ◽  
Absolute Size ◽  
Disc Protrusion ◽  
Disc Herniations ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: The goal of this study was to determine whether the absolute size (mm2), relative size (% canal compromise), or location of a single-level, lumbar disc herniation (LDH) on axial and sagittal cuts of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were predictive of eventual surgical intervention. Methods: MRIs of 89 patients were reviewed, and patients were split into groups based on type of management received (34 nonoperative vs 55 microdiscectomy). Radiographic characteristics—including size of disc herniation (mm2), size of spinal canal (mm2), location of herniation on axial (central, paracentral, foraminal) and sagittal (disc level, suprapedicle, pedicle, infrapedicle) planes, and type of herniation (bulge, protrusion, extrusion, sequestration)—were measured by 2 independent, orthopedic spine fellows and compared between groups via univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: The operative group showed a significantly higher percentage of canal compromise (39.5% vs 31.1%, P = .001) compared to the nonoperative group. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed higher odds of eventual operative intervention for a disc protrusion (odds ratio [OR] 6.30 [1.99, 19.86], P = .002) or disc extrusion (OR 11.5 [1.63, 81.2], P = .014) for Rater 1 and a higher odds of eventual surgical management for a paracentral location for both Rater 1 and Rater 2 (OR = 3.39 [1.25, 9.22], P = .017, and OR = 5.46 [1.77, 16.8], P = .003, respectively). Conclusions: Disc herniations in a paracentral location were more likely to undergo operative treatment than those more centrally located, on axial MRI views.

scholarly journals A Study of Lumbar Disc Herniation and Facet Joint Asymmetry

2019 ◽  
Vol 103 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 87-94
Author(s):  
Qi Lai ◽  
Yuan Liu ◽  
Runsheng Guo ◽  
Xin Lv ◽  
Qiang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Facet Joint ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Patients Âgés ◽  
Lower Lumbar Spine ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Facet Joint Degeneration ◽  
Disc Herniations ◽  
Lumbar Facet

Purpose: To investigate the association of facet joint asymmetry with lumbar disc herniation at the lower lumbar spine. Methods: A total of 90 patients (ages 18–40 years) with single-level disc herniation (L3–L4, L4–L5, or L5–S1) were included in the study. Facet asymmetry was defined as a difference of 10° in facet joint angles between right and left sides. Normal discs in the same segment of other individuals were used as a control. Patients had facet asymmetry measured for L3 to S1 through 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging, and information was collected, including age, sex, degenerative degree of lumbar facet joints, and the presence or absence of lumbar disc herniation and type. Results: At the L3 to L4 level, 2 cases had facet asymmetry in 8 patients with lumbar disc herniation, compared with 17 cases of facet asymmetry in 82 patients without disc herniation (P = 0.7776, r = 0.030). At the L4 to L5 level, there were 21 cases of facet asymmetry in 45 patients with lumbar disc herniation, compared with 5 cases of asymmetry in 45 patients without disc herniation (P = 0.00019, r = 0.392). At the L5 to S1 level, there were 25 cases of facet asymmetry in 37 patients with lumbar disc herniation, compared with 11 cases of facet asymmetry in 53 patients without disc herniation (P = 0.0000, r = 0.492). There were 23 cases of facet asymmetry in 28 disc herniations of side type compared with 2 cases of facet asymmetry in 9 herniations of center type (P = 0.0008, r = 0.364). There was no significant difference in the relationship between age, facet joint degeneration, and lumbar facet joint asymmetry (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Facet asymmetry is significantly associated with lumbar disc herniation at the L4 to L5 and the L5 to S1 levels, whereas there is an obvious association with the side type of lumbar disc herniation at the L5 to S1 level.

scholarly journals Genotypic and Antimicrobial Characterisation ofPropionibacterium acnesIsolates from Surgically Excised Lumbar Disc Herniations

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jess Rollason ◽  
Andrew McDowell ◽  
Hanne B. Albert ◽  
Emma Barnard ◽  
Tony Worthington ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Herniated Disc ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Type Ia ◽  
Disc Herniations ◽  
Typing Methods ◽  
Human Infections ◽  
Clinical Conditions

The anaerobic skin commensalPropionibacterium acnesis an underestimated cause of human infections and clinical conditions. Previous studies have suggested a role for the bacterium in lumbar disc herniation and infection. To further investigate this, five biopsy samples were surgically excised from each of 64 patients with lumbar disc herniation.P. acnesand other bacteria were detected by anaerobic culture, followed by biochemical and PCR-based identification. In total, 24/64 (38%) patients had evidence ofP. acnesin their excised herniated disc tissue. UsingrecAand mAb typing methods, 52% of the isolates were type II (50% of culture-positive patients), while type IA strains accounted for 28% of isolates (42% patients). Type III (11% isolates; 21% patients) and type IB strains (9% isolates; 17% patients) were detected less frequently. The MIC values for all isolates were lowest for amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, rifampicin, tetracycline, and vancomycin (≤1mg/L). The MIC for fusidic acid was 1-2 mg/L. The MIC for trimethoprim and gentamicin was 2 to ≥4 mg/L. The demonstration that type II and III strains, which are not frequently recovered from skin, predominated within our isolate collection (63%) suggests that the role ofP. acnesin lumbar disc herniation should not be readily dismissed.

Relationship Between Rates and Outcomes of Operative Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation and Spinal Stenosis

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 752-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT B. KELLER ◽  
STEVEN J. ATLAS ◽  
DAVID N. SOULE ◽  
DANIEL E. SINGER ◽  
RICHARD A. DEYO
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc

scholarly journals Treatment of Calcified Lumbar Disc Herniation by Intervertebral Foramen Remolding a Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ao-lin Yuan ◽  
Xin Shen ◽  
Bin Chen
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Intervertebral Foramen ◽  
Oswestry Disability Index Score ◽  
Disc Herniations ◽  
Dural Leak ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Abstract Background: The percutaneous intervertebral foramen mirror technology is a new solution for lumbar disorders. However, like other minimally-invasive treatments for calcified lumbar discs, it is still controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of the percutaneous intervertebral foramen lens technology for secondary molding of the intervertebral foramen in the treatment of calcified lumbar discs. Methods: The study included 50 patients aged (mean ± standard deviation) 49.9 ± 14.5 years, 30 (60%) females, who were diagnosed with calcified lumbar disc herniation by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Patients underwent a percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy surgery in our hospital from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019. Demographic characteristics before the surgery and perioperative outcomes were retrospective reviewed. The treatment outcome was analyzed using the visual analog scale (VAS) score, the Oswestry Disability Index score, and modified Macnab criteria. Results: We evaluated those patients who showed significant improvement in both the VAS and ODI scores after the surgery and maintained relatively low ODI and VAS scores during subsequent follow-ups. Ninety-four percent of patients rated the results as "excellent" or "good" according to the modified Macnab criteria at the 3-month follow-up. One patient developed neck pain during the surgery, which was diagnosed as spinal hypertension syndrome, and the surgery was suspended until the patient improved. No patient had a dural leak, infection, or other related complications. Conclusions: Our results indicate that transforaminal remolding is effective in the treatment of calcified lumbar disc herniations, with few intraoperative and postoperative complications.Our results indicate that secondary reconstruction of the intervertebral foramen under visual conditions using microscopic knife is an effective method for treating calcified lumbar disc herniation, with few intraoperative and postoperative complications.

scholarly journals Extreme Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation : Pitfalls in Diagnosis and Operative Treatment

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 500-506
Author(s):  
Akira Matsumura ◽  
Sadayuki Takeuchi ◽  
Takashi Tsunoda ◽  
Satoshi Ayuzawa ◽  
Atsushi Saito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc

scholarly journals Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Shepard ◽  
Woojin Cho
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Disc Herniations ◽  
Invasive Techniques ◽  
Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation

Study Design: Narrative review. Objectives: To identify the risk factors and surgical management for recurrent lumbar disc herniation using a systematic review of available evidence. Methods: We conducted a review of PubMed, MEDLINE, OVID, and Cochrane Library databases using search terms identifying recurrent lumbar disc herniation and risk factors or surgical management. Abstracts of all identified articles were reviewed. Detailed information from articles with levels I to IV evidence was extracted and synthesized. Results: There is intermediate levels III to IV evidence detailing perioperative risk factors and the optimal surgical technique for recurrent lumbar disc herniations. Conclusions: Multiple risk factors including smoking, diabetes mellitus, obesity, intraoperative technique, and biomechanical factors may contribute to the development of recurrent disc disease. There is widespread variation regarding optimal surgical management for recurrent herniation, which often include revision discectomies with or without fusion via open and minimally invasive techniques.

Unilateral surgical approach for lumbar disc herniation with contralateral symptoms

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taşkan Akdeniz ◽  
Tuncay Kaner ◽  
İbrahim Tutkan ◽  
Ali Fahir Ozer
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Surgical Approach ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Radicular Pain ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Motor Deficits ◽  
Disc Herniations ◽  
Herniated Lumbar Disc ◽  
Contralateral Symptoms

Object In most cases of lumbar disc herniation, the primary problem is usually limited to radicular pain due to nerve compression on the herniated side, which is generally limited to the side of operation. The aim of this study was to reevaluate the side of the surgical approach in a selected group of patients with leg pain and contralateral lumbar disc herniation. Methods Included in this study were a total of 5 patients with lumbar disc herniations who presented with contralateral symptoms and neurological signs. In all cases, patients underwent a microdiscectomy from the side ipsilateral to the herniated lumbar disc, the side contralateral to the motor deficits and leg pain. Results The symptoms and signs, to some extent, resolved during the immediate postoperative period. There were no postoperative complications. Conclusions The findings confirm that performing a laminotomy via the side of the herniation is sufficient for this group of patients.

scholarly journals Non-surgical treatment with XSHHD for ruptured lumbar disc herniation: a 3-year prospective observational study

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Dai ◽  
Yu Xiang Dai ◽  
Hong Jiang ◽  
Peng Fei Yu ◽  
Jin Tao Liu
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Nucleus Pulposus ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Outcome Measurements ◽  
Straight Leg Raising ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri ◽  
Non Surgical Treatment

Abstract Background Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is mainly caused by annular fiber disruption with a discrete leakage of nucleus pulposus pressing on a nerve, resulting in back pain and radiating pain. Most patients with LDH can be treated conservatively, but there are many different conservative treatments. Furthermore, most previous studies did not evaluate the long-term efficacy of these treatments and the prognosis. Therefore, an effective and safe therapeutic strategy is lacking for patients with LDH. In this study, we evaluated Xiao Sui Hua He decoction (XSHHD) in the treatment of LDH. Methods This was a rigorous prospective observational 3-year follow-up study. We recruited 69 participants with ruptured lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) between February 2014 and February 2016. Patients took XSHHD orally twice a day for 6 months. The primary outcome measurements were visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and straight leg raising test (SLRT). The secondary outcome measurements was nucleus pulposus protrusion volume on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Clinical outcomes were measured at baseline (Visit 1), and at 3, 6, 12, and 36 months (Visit 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively).. Results Sixty-three patients were followed-up for 3 years after treatment. SLRT and ODI after non-surgical treatment improved significantly compared with baseline (P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences at 6 months vs 36 months for SLRT and ODI. VAS scores (leg, back) after 3 years of treatment were statistically significantly different compared with baseline (P < .001; Z = − 6.93, − 6.637). The baseline protrusion volume was 2018.61 ± 601.16 mm3, and the volume decreased significantly to 996.51 ± 387.42 mm3 at 36 months (t = 12.863; P < .001). The volume of protrusion resorption rate (VPRR) at 36 months was 47.24 ± 23.99%, with significant resorption in 23 cases, partial resorption in 23 cases, no resorption in 15 cases, and increased volume in 2 cases. Conclusions This study showed that non-surgical treatment with XSHHD was effective, and the study clarified the natural outcomes in LDH.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document