scholarly journals Midterm Safety of Carbon Dioxide Insufflation of the Knee During Arthroscopic Cartilage–Based Procedures

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 232596712110354
Author(s):  
Judson L. Penton ◽  
Travis R. Flick ◽  
Felix H. Savoie ◽  
Wendell M. Heard ◽  
William F. Sherman
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Electronic Medical Records ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Knee Arthroscopy ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Systemic Complications ◽  
Allograft Transplantation

Background: When compared with fluid arthroscopy, carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation offers an increased scope of view and a more natural-appearing joint cavity, and it eliminates floating debris that may obscure the surgeon’s view. Despite the advantages of CO2 insufflation during knee arthroscopy and no reported cases of air emboli, the technique is not widely used because of concerns of hematogenous gas leakage and a lack of case series demonstrating safety. Purpose/Hypothesis: To investigate the safety profile of CO2 insufflation during arthroscopic osteochondral allograft transplantation of the knee and report the midterm clinical outcomes using this technique. We hypothesized that patients undergoing CO2 insufflation of the knee joint would have minimal systemic complications, allowing arthroscopic cartilage work in a dry field. Study Design: Case series; level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of electronic medical records for patients who underwent arthroscopic osteochondral allograft transplantation of the knee with the use of CO2 insufflation. Included were patients aged 18 to 65 years who underwent knee arthroscopy with CO2 insufflation from January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2021, and who had a minimum follow-up of 24 months. All procedures were performed by a single, fellowship-trained and board-certified sports medicine surgeon. The patients’ electronic medical records were reviewed in their entirety for relevant demographic and clinical outcomes. Results: We evaluated 27 patients (14 women and 13 men) with a mean age of 38 and a mean follow-up of 39.2 months. CO2 insufflation was used in 100% of cases during the placement of the osteochondral allograft. None of the patients sustained any systemic complications, including signs or symptoms of gas embolism or persistent subcutaneous emphysema. Conclusion: The results of this case series suggest CO2 insufflation during knee arthroscopy can be performed safely with minimal systemic complications and provide an alternative environment for treating osteochondral defects requiring a dry field in the knee.

scholarly journals Osteochondral allograft transplantation for large Hill-Sachs lesions: a retrospective case series with a minimum 2-year follow-up

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongwu Zhuo ◽  
Yangkai Xu ◽  
Fugui Zhu ◽  
Ling Pan ◽  
Jian Li
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Satisfaction Rate ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Constant Murley Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Graft Resorption

Abstract Purpose To investigate the clinical outcomes after osteochondral allograft transplantation for large Hill-Sachs lesions. Methods Patients who underwent osteochondral allograft transplantation for large Hill-Sachs lesions were identified. Clinical assessment consisted of active range of motion (ROM), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Constant-Murley score, Rowe score, and patient satisfaction rate. Radiographic assessment was performed with CT scan. Results Nineteen patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 21.7 years. The mean preoperative size of the Hill-Sachs lesion was 35.70 ± 3.02%. The mean follow-up was 27.8 months. All grafts achieved union at an average of 3.47 months after surgery. At the final follow-up, graft resorption was observed in 43.1% of patients. The average size of residual humeral head articular arc loss was 12.31 ± 2.79%. Significant improvements (P < .001) were observed for the active ROM, ASES score, Constant-Murley score, and Rowe score. The overall satisfaction rate was 94.7%. No significant difference was found between the resorption group and the nonresorption group in postoperative clinical outcomes. Conclusion Osteochondral allograft transplantation is a useful treatment option for patients with large Hill-Sachs lesions. Although the incidence of graft resorption may be relatively high, the clinical outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up are favorable. Level of evidence Level IV, case series

Clinical Outcomes of Multifocal Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Knee: An Analysis of Overlapping Grafts and Multifocal Lesions

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (12) ◽  
pp. 2884-2893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric J. Cotter ◽  
Charles P. Hannon ◽  
David R. Christian ◽  
Kevin C. Wang ◽  
Drew A. Lansdown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Arthroscopic Surgery ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Physical Component Summary Score ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Allograft Transplantation

Background: There is a paucity of literature regarding the outcomes of adjacent-plug osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) for irregular or ovoid lesions and multifocal OCA for multicompartmental, focal lesions. Purpose: To quantify the survival of multiplug OCA for larger, high-grade chondral lesions with the “snowman” technique versus that of multicompartmental or bipolar OCA. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All patients who underwent primary, multiplug OCA for large unicondylar, multicompartmental (eg, bipolar patellofemoral and condylar, bicondylar), or bipolar chondral defects (ie, patellofemoral) with a minimum 2-year follow-up by a single surgeon from April 1, 2003, to April 1, 2015, were analyzed. Failure was defined as revision OCA, conversion to arthroplasty, or gross appearance of graft degeneration on second-look arthroscopic surgery. Results: Twenty-six patients (28 knees) were identified, with 22 patients (24 knees; 50% female; mean age, 31.9 ± 9.1 years) having at least 2-year clinical follow-up (85.7%). Nine patients (9 knees) underwent isolated, condylar OCA with the snowman technique and had a mean follow-up of 7.4 ± 3.6 years (range, 1.38-11.14 years), while 13 additional patients (15 knees) underwent multifocal OCA and had a mean follow-up of 6.4 ± 3.9 years (range, 2.07-12.38 years). Reoperations were common, with 44.4% (n = 4) of the snowman group and 20.0% (n = 3) of the multifocal group undergoing at least 1 reoperation. There were 3 failures (33.3%) in the snowman group at a mean 7.7 ± 5.5 years and 1 failure (6.7%) in the multifocal group at 4.5 ± 0.0 years, with all undergoing secondary total knee arthroplasty. Patients who underwent snowman OCA demonstrated significant postoperative improvement in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain subscore and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) overall score ( P < .05 for both). Patients who underwent multifocal OCA demonstrated significant improvement in the International Knee Documentation Committee score; KOOS symptoms, activities of daily living, sport, and quality of life subscores; WOMAC stiffness, function, and overall subscores; and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey physical component summary score ( P < .05 for all). Conclusion: Patients who underwent unicondylar, multiplug OCA using the snowman technique demonstrated inferior clinical outcomes, higher reoperation rates, and greater failure rates than those who underwent isolated single-graft transplantation. By contrast, multifocal OCA may be a viable knee preservation technique for young, active patients with multicompartmental chondral disease, leading to improved clinical outcomes and low reoperation and failure rates at midterm follow-up.

Midterm Results of Fresh-Frozen Osteochondral Allografting for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

2020 ◽  
pp. 107110072094986
Author(s):  
Chung-Hua Chu ◽  
Ing-Ho Chen ◽  
Kai-Chiang Yang ◽  
Chen-Chie Wang
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Midterm Results ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
The Mean

Background: Osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) are relatively common. Following the failure of conservative treatment, many operative options have yielded varied results. In this study, midterm outcomes after fresh-frozen osteochondral allograft transplantation for the treatment of OLT were evaluated. Methods: Twenty-five patients (12 women and 13 men) with a mean age 40.4 (range 18-70) years between 2009 and 2014 were enrolled. Of 25 ankles, 3, 13, 4, and 4 were involved with the talus at Raikin zone 3, 4, 6, and 7 as well as one coexisted with zone 4 and 6 lesion. The mean OLT area was 1.82 cm2 (range, 1.1-3.0). The mean follow-up period was 5.5 years (range, 4-9.3). Outcomes evaluation included the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, visual analog scale score, and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Result: AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score increased from 74 preoperatively to 94 at 2 years postoperatively ( P < .001) and the SF-12 physical health component scores increased from 32 to 46 points ( P < .001). Incorporation was inspected in all patients in the latest follow-up, and graft subsidence and radiolucency were observed in 2 and 7 cases, respectively, whereas graft collapse and revision OLT graft were not observed. Bone sclerosis was found in 6 of 25 patients. Conclusion: With respect to midterm results, fresh, frozen-stored allograft transplantation might be an option in the management of symptomatic OLT. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes of ProChondrix® Osteochondral Allograft in the Knee: A Case Series

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Barnum ◽  
Evan D. Boyd ◽  
Annabelle P. Davey ◽  
Andrew Slauterbeck ◽  
James R. Slauterbeck
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cartilage Defect ◽  
Femoral Condyle ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Cartilage Restoration ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract PurposeFocal articular cartilage injuries are common and may lead to progression of osteoarthritis. The complications associated with traditional treatment strategies have influenced the development of new biotechnologies, such as the ProChondrix® osteochondral allograft. Clinical evidence on the outcomes associated with ProChondrix® osteochondral allografts are limited. Thus, the primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes following treatment of an isolated cartilage defect with a ProChondrix® osteochondral allograft implant.MethodsRetrospective analysis of patients who underwent a cartilage restoration procedure using ProChondrix® osteochondral allograft has been performed. Patients completed patient-reported outcome surveys which included the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), consisting of the 5 subscales of Pain, Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living, Sports and Recreation, and Quality of Life, the Marx Activity Scale, and the visual analog pain scale.ResultsSix patients underwent a cartilage restoration procedure using ProChondrix® between January 2016 and December 2019. Three males and three females were included with a median age of 33.5 years (range 18–48 years). The median follow-up duration was 15 months (range 9–24 months). There were 4 patellar grafts, 1 medial femoral condyle graft, and 1 lateral femoral condyle graft, with a median defect size of 18.5mm (range 13-20mm). At the most recent clinical follow-up, all six patients were pain free and all patients had returned to pre-op activity level.ConclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first study to report the clinical outcome, activity level, and patient orientated outcomes in a case series of patients following treatment of an isolated cartilage defect with a ProChondrix® osteochondral allograft implant. Our study demonstrates promising short-term results in patient reported clinical outcome scores.

Graft-Recipient Anteroposterior Mismatch Does Not Affect the Midterm Clinical Outcomes of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Femoral Condyle

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 2441-2448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean Wang ◽  
Francesca R. Coxe ◽  
George C. Balazs ◽  
Brenda Chang ◽  
Kristofer J. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Femoral Condyle ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Radius Of Curvature ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Graft Recipient

Background: For the treatment of femoral condyle cartilage defects with osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA), many surgeons have relaxed their graft-recipient size-matching criteria given the limited allograft supply. However, since the anteroposterior (AP) length is typically correlated with the radius of curvature for a given condyle, a large mismatch in graft-recipient AP length can indicate a corresponding mismatch in the radius of curvature, leading to articular incongruity after implantation. Purpose: To evaluate the association between femoral condyle graft–recipient AP mismatch and clinical outcomes of OCA. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients treated with OCA for femoral condyle chondral defects from 2000 to 2015. Graft characteristics, including AP and mediolateral dimensions, were gathered from vendor-specific allograft offering documents. Patient condyle dimensions were measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Reoperations and patient responses to validated outcome measures were reviewed. Failure was defined by any partial removal/revision of the allograft or conversion to knee arthroplasty. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to examine the association of AP mismatch with OCA failure while adjusting for patient age and number of previous ipsilateral knee surgical procedures. Results: A total of 69 knees from 69 patients (mean age, 35.7 years; 71% male) met the inclusion criteria. Mean duration of follow-up was 4 years (range, 2-16 years). The mean absolute graft-recipient AP mismatch was 6.7 mm (range, 0-20 mm; P < .01). At final follow-up, 19 knees had failed. There was no significant difference in the mean absolute AP mismatch between failures (8.1 mm) and nonfailures (6.2 mm; P = .17). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that AP mismatch was not associated with graft failure ( P = .14). At final follow-up, significant improvements were noted in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form, and Knee Outcome Survey–Activities of Daily Living ( P < .01 for all). Magnitude of AP mismatch was not associated with postoperative outcome scores or achievement of minimal clinically significant differences in outcome scores. Conclusion: Magnitude of graft-recipient AP mismatch was not associated with midterm OCA failure rates or patient-reported outcome scores, suggesting that AP length mismatch within the limits measured here is not a contraindication for graft acceptance.

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Patellofemoral Joint: A Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (12) ◽  
pp. 3009-3018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Chahla ◽  
Matthew C. Sweet ◽  
Kelechi R. Okoroha ◽  
Benedict U. Nwachukwu ◽  
Betina Hinckel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Patellofemoral Joint ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Chondral Defects ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: The initial focus of cartilage restoration algorithms has been on the femur; however, the patellofemoral compartment accounts for 20% to 30% of significant symptomatic chondral pathologies. While patellofemoral compartment treatment involves a completely unique subset of comorbidities, with a comprehensive and thoughtful approach many patients may benefit from osteochondral allograft treatment. Purpose: To perform a systematic review of clinical outcomes and failure rates after osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) of the patellofemoral joint at a minimum 18-month follow-up. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the literature regarding the existing evidence for clinical outcomes and failure rates of OCA for patellofemoral joint chondral defects was performed with the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and MEDLINE from studies published between 1990 and 2017. Inclusion criteria were as follows: clinical outcomes and failure rates of OCA for the treatment of chondral defects in the patellofemoral joint, English language, minimum follow-up of 18 months, minimum study size of 5 patients, and human studies. The methodological quality of each study was assessed with a modified version of the Coleman methodology score. Results: The systematic search identified 8 studies with a total of 129 patients. The methods of graft procurement and storage time included fresh (121 patients, 93.8%), and cryopreserved (8 patients, 6.2%) grafts. The mean survival rate was 87.9% at 5 years and 77.2% at 10 years. The following outcome scores showed significant improvement from pre- to postoperative status: modified d’Aubigné-Postel, International Knee Documentation Committee, Knee Society Score–Function, and Lysholm Knee Score. Conclusion: OCA of the patellofemoral joint results in improved patient-reported outcome measures with high patient satisfaction rates. Five- and 10-year survival rates of 87.9% and 77.2%, respectively, can be expected after this procedure. These findings should be taken with caution, as a high percentage of patellofemoral osteochondral allografts were associated with concomitant procedures; therefore, further research is warranted to determine the effect of isolated osteochondral transplantations.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes of Multiple Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Knee: An Analysis of Snowman Technique and Multifocal Lesions

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric J. Cotter ◽  
Charles P. Hannon ◽  
Drew A. Lansdown ◽  
Rachel M. Frank ◽  
Brian Robert Waterman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Femoral Condyle ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
International Knee Documentation Committee ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Rate Of Failure

Objectives: To report the clinical outcomes of snowman technique osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) and clinical outcomes of multifocal OCA. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent either a primary snowman OCA or multifocal (i.e. bipolar patellofemoral, patellofemoral and a condyle or bicondylar) with a minimum 2-year follow-up by a single surgeon from 4/2003 to 4/2015 were isolated. Failure was defined as revision OCA, conversion to arthroplasty, or gross appearance of graft degeneration on 2nd look arthroscopy. Results: Twenty-six patients (28 knees) were isolated with 22 patients (24 knees; 85.7%) having 2-year clinical follow-up. Nine of 11 patients (81.8%) who underwent isolated condylar snowman allografts met inclusion criteria at mean follow-up of 7.4±3.6 years, while 13 additional patients (15 knees; 88.2%) underwent multifocal OCA at mean follow-up of 6.4±3.9 years. All 9 patients who received isolated snowman OCA were to the medial femoral condyle. Reoperations were common with 44.4% (N=4) of the snowman group and 20% of multifocal OCA (N=3) undergoing at least 1 reoperation. There were 3 failures (33.3%) in the snowman technique group at a mean 7.7±5.5 years and 1 failure in the multifocal OCA group at 4.5 years. All 4 failures underwent TKA. Patients who underwent multifocal OCA demonstrated significant improvements in the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis subscores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index subscores, and the Short-Form-12 physical component (P <0.05 for all). Patients who underwent snowman OCA demonstrated significant improvement in KOOS pain subscore and WOMAC overall scores (P<0.05 for both) Table 1]. Conclusion: While in a small cohort, patients who underwent snowman OCA had a high rate of reoperation (44.4%) and a high rate of failure (33.3%). Comparatively, patients who underwent multifocal OCA had reoperation and graft survival rates comparable to published literature for focal OCA. [Table: see text]

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Knee in Patients Aged 40 Years and Older

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 581-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean Wang ◽  
Vivek Kalia ◽  
Claire D. Eliasberg ◽  
Tim Wang ◽  
Francesca R. Coxe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Cartilage Defects ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Allograft Transplantation

Background: Treatment of large chondral defects of the knee among patients aged ≥40 years remains a difficult clinical challenge owing to preexisting joint degeneration and the lack of treatment options short of arthroplasty. Purpose: To characterize the survivorship, predictors of failure, and clinical outcomes of osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) of the knee among patients aged ≥40 years. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Prospectively collected data were reviewed for 54 consecutive patients aged ≥40 years who were treated with OCA. Preoperative levels of osteoarthritis (according to Kellgren-Lawrence classification) and meniscal volume and quality were graded from review of radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging. Complications, reoperations, and patient responses to validated outcome measures were reviewed. A minimum follow-up of 2 years was required for analysis. Failure was defined by any removal or revision of the allograft or conversion to arthroplasty. Results: Among 51 patients (mean age, 48 years; range, 40-63 years; 65% male), a total of 52 knees had symptomatic focal cartilage lesions (up to 2 affected areas) that were classified as Outerbridge grade 4 at the time of OCA and did not involve substantial bone loss requiring shell allografts or additional bone grafting. Mean duration of follow-up was 3.6 years (range, 2-11 years). After OCA, 21 knees (40%) underwent reoperation, including 14 failures (27%) consisting of revision OCA (n = 1), unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (n = 5), and total knee arthroplasty (n = 8). Mean time to failure was 33 months, and 2- and 4-year survivorship rates were 88% and 73%, respectively. Male sex (hazard ratio = 4.18, 95% CI = 1.12-27.13) and a higher number of previous ipsilateral knee operations (hazard ratio = 1.70 per increase in 1 surgical procedure, 95% CI = 1.03-2.83) were predictors of failure. A higher Kellgren-Lawrence osteoarthritis grade on preoperative radiographs was associated with higher failure rates in the Kaplan-Meier analysis but not the multivariate model. At final follow-up, clinically significant improvements were noted in the pain (mean score, 47.8 to 67.6) and physical functioning (56.8 to 79.1) subscales of the Short Form-36, as well as the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form (45.0 to 63.6), Knee Outcome Survey–Activities of Daily Living (64.5 to 80.1), and overall condition statement (4.5 to 6.8) ( P < .001). No significant changes were noted for the Marx Activity Rating Scale (5.1 to 3.9, P = .789). Conclusion: A higher failure rate was found in this series of patients aged ≥40 years who were treated with OCA as compared with other studies of younger populations. However, for select older patients, OCA can be a good midterm treatment option for cartilage defects of the knee.

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Knee: Analysis of Failures at 5 Years

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 864-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel M. Frank ◽  
Simon Lee ◽  
David Levy ◽  
Sarah Poland ◽  
Maggie Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Arthroscopic Surgery ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Reoperation Rate ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Arthroscopic Debridement ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Allograft Transplantation

Background: Osteochondral allograft transplantation (OAT) is being performed with increasing frequency, and the need for reoperations is not uncommon. Purpose: To quantify survival for OAT and report findings at reoperations. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A review of prospectively collected data of 224 consecutive patients who underwent OAT by a single surgeon with a minimum follow-up of 2 years was conducted. The reoperation rate, timing of reoperation, procedure performed, and findings at surgery were reviewed. Failure was defined by revision OAT, conversion to knee arthroplasty, or gross appearance of graft failure at second-look arthroscopic surgery. Results: A total of 180 patients (mean [±SD] age, 32.7 ± 10.4 years; 52% male) who underwent OAT with a mean follow-up of 5.0 ± 2.7 years met the inclusion criteria (80% follow-up). Of these, 172 patients (96%) underwent a mean of 2.5 ± 1.7 prior surgical procedures on the ipsilateral knee before OAT. Forty-eight percent of OAT procedures were isolated, while 52% were performed with concomitant procedures including meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT) in 65 (36%). Sixty-six patients (37%) underwent a reoperation at a mean of 2.5 ± 2.5 years, with 32% (21/66) undergoing additional reoperations (range, 1-3). Arthroscopic debridement was performed in 91% of patients with initial reoperations, with 83% showing evidence of an intact graft; of these, 9 ultimately progressed to failure at a mean of 4.1 ± 1.9 years. A total of 24 patients (13%) were considered failures at a mean of 3.6 ± 2.6 years after the index OAT procedure because of revision OAT (n = 7), conversion to arthroplasty (n= 12), or appearance of a poorly incorporated allograft at arthroscopic surgery (n = 5). The number of previous surgical procedures was independently predictive of reoperations and failure; body mass index was independently predictive of failure. Excluding the failed patients, statistically and clinically significant improvements were found in the Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Short Form–12 physical component summary at final follow-up ( P < .001 for all), with inferior outcomes (albeit overall improved) in patients who underwent a reoperation. Conclusion: In this series, there was a 37% reoperation rate and an 87% allograft survival rate at a mean of 5 years after OAT. The number of previous ipsilateral knee surgical procedures was predictive of reoperations and failure. Of the patients who underwent arthroscopic debridement with an intact graft at the time of arthroscopic surgery, 82% experienced significantly improved outcomes, while 18% ultimately progressed to failure. This information can be used to counsel patients on the implications of a reoperation after OAT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document