scholarly journals Multimodal Analgesia Plus Intraoperative Hamstring Sheath Injection for Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Reduces Postoperative Posterior Knee Pain But Does Not Reduce Postoperative Narcotic Requirements: A Double-Blind Randomized Control Trial (171)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0029
Author(s):  
Brian Walczak ◽  
Eamon Bernardoni ◽  
Quinn Steiner ◽  
Geoffrey Baer ◽  
John Shepler

Objectives: This study’s objective was to determine whether multimodal analgesia plus an injection of the hamstring sheath immediately following the harvest of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons during hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) reduces postoperative pain. We hypothesized that multimodal analgesia plus a hamstring sheath injection of the harvest site for autograft hamstring ACLR reduces postoperative pain. Methods: The Institutional Review Board approved this study registered with ClinicalTrials.gov and identified by NCT01868425. This study was a single-center, surgeon stratified double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study from April 2013 to December 2017. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups, in a 1:1 ratio per surgeon, to receive either standard of care analgesia plus intra-operative hamstring sheath saline injection (Placebo group) or standard of care analgesia plus multimodal analgesia plus intraoperative hamstring sheath anesthetic injection (MA group) for patients undergoing ACLR with hamstring autograft. Eligible participants were adults aged 18 years to 55 years old consented for ACLR using hamstring tendon autograft. Contraindication to a femoral nerve block, allergy to protocol medications, nervous system disease, renal or hepatic impairment, history of opioid dependence or current narcotic use, significant psychiatric disease, pregnancy or lactating, a seizure disorder, history of postoperative nausea and vomiting, latex allergy, and clinically significant cardiac or pulmonary disease excluded patients for participation in this study. The primary endpoint was total postoperative opioid administration. Secondary endpoints included the patient’s subjective pain score for the posterior, anterior, and lateral side of the knee, postoperative nausea, sedation, and pruritus scores. Based on our preliminary data, we estimated the mean opioid for standard care will be 6.6 morphine equivalents with a standard deviation of 6.2 morphine equivalents. Testing the ability of multimodal analgesia to reduce opioid usage by at least 50%, a minimal sample size of 45 subjects per group was needed to achieve 80% power based on a one-tailed t-test and a significance level < 0.05. Student’s t-test compared outcomes between groups. Additionally, a linear regression model for was also used for the primary outcome with total opioid administration as the dependent variable in order to control for body mass index (BMI) and sex, providing an adjusted estimate of the difference between groups. Results: A total of 112 patients (Figure 1) met inclusion criteria and were randomized into the placebo group (n = 57) and MA group (n = 55). Demographic data demonstrated no significant differences between groups (Table 1). The primary analysis was postoperative opioid administration and included all patients randomly assigned to either group for opioid administration in the postoperative anesthetic care unit (PACU), however opioid administration in 24 hours after discharge was not recorded for five patients in the MA group, leaving 50 patients remaining for the per-protocol analyses. Secondary outcome data was not recorded for one patient in the placebo group leaving 56 patients remaining for the per-protocol analyses. The mean postoperative opioid needs (Table 2) for patients in the MA group (18.7 ± 13.14) was less than those in the placebo group (22.6 ± 11.15), although this was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.140). Secondary outcomes (Figure 2A) demonstrated a significant reduction in posterior knee pain postoperatively in the MA group (2.84 ± 2.25) compared to Placebo (3.56 ± 1.97; p-value = 0.0362). There were no significant differences in postoperative pain in the front or sides of the knee. Similarly, there were no significant differences in pruritis (MA: 0.26 ± 0.99 vs. Placebo: 0.696 ± 1.73; p-value = 0.2163), sedation (MA: 5.02 ± 2.29 vs. Placebo: 4.61 ± 2.16; p-value = 0.656), and nausea (MA: 1.16 ± 2.28 vs Placebo: 0.714 ± 1.72; p-value = 0.243) scores (Figure 2B). Conclusions: Multimodal analgesia plus hamstring sheath injection reduces postoperative patient reported posterior knee pain compared to placebo for patients undergoing ACLR using hamstring tendon autograft. However, multimodal analgesia plus a hamstring sheath injection does not reduce postoperative opioid requirements.

2021 ◽  
pp. 5-12
Author(s):  
T. N. Garmanova ◽  
D. R. Markaryan ◽  
E. A. Kazachenko ◽  
A. M. Lukianov ◽  
M. A. Agapov

Aim: To assess the efficiency of preemptive analgesia with Ketoprofen 10 mg 2 hours before procedure per os with spinal anesthesia to decrease postoperative pain and the amount of used analgesics.Methods: Patients of our clinic who meet the following inclusion criteria are included: they must be diagnosed with anorectal disease and planned anorectal procedure. After signing the consent all participants are randomly divided into 2 groups: the first one gets a tablet with 10 mg Ketoprofen, the second one gets a tablet containing starch per os 2 hours before surgery (72 participants per arm). Patients of both arms receive spinal anesthesia and undergo open hemorrhoidectomy. Following the procedure the primary and secondary outcomes are evaluated: opioid administration intake, the pain at rest and during defecation, duration and frequency of other analgesics intake, readmission rate, overall quality of life, time from the procedure to returning to work and the complications rate.Discussion: Multimodality pain management has been shown to improve pain control and decrease opioid intake in patients after anorectal surgery in several studies. Gabapentin can be considered as an alternative approach to pain control as NSAIDs have limitative adverse effects. Systemic admission of ketorolac with local anesthetics also showed significant efficacy in patients undergoing anorectal surgery. We hope to prove the efficacy of multimodal analgesia including preemptive one for patients undergoing anorectal procedure that will help to hold postoperative pain level no more than 3-4 points on VAS with minimal consumption of opioid analgesics.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-184
Author(s):  
Arun Kumar Balasubramanian ◽  
Rasikapriya Madhanagopal ◽  
Priyanka S Gowda ◽  
Brindha Rathnasabapathy ◽  
R Shankar

Currently most of the anesthetist prefer the usage of multimodal analgesia technique to improve the degree of pain relief without inducing any side effects. Pregabalin and gabapentin when given in higher doses reduces the preoperative anxiety and induce sedation without causing undesirable side effects.To compare and evaluate the effects of premedication drugs Pregabalin or Gabapentin versus placebo for attenuation of postoperative pain among patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia.A prospective comparative study was conducted for a period of 6 months in the department of anesthesiology of our medical college hospital. A total of 90 patients posted for elective laproscopic cholecystectomy in the age group between 20 and 60 years were taken as our study subjects. The entire study subjects were randomized into three groups of 30 each. Group B subjects received 3 tablets of Beplex forte (as placebo), Group G subjects received 3 tablets of Gabapentin 300mg (total 900mg) and Group P subjects received 3 tablets of Pregabalin 50mg (total 150mg). Post-operatively degree of pain, requirement for rescue analgesia, sedation score and adverse events occurred was monitored and analysed between the three groups. Pain score was less in the pregabalin group at all intervals compared to gabapentin and placebo group and the difference was found to be statistically significant. Maximum amount of tramadol requirement as a part of rescue analgesia was seen in the placebo group followed by gabapentin group and minimal dose requirement was needed for pregabalin group and the difference was found to be statistically significant. The occurrence of adverse events such as somnolence and dizziness was almost similar in all the three groups whereas the incidence of nausea and vomiting was less in pregabalin group compared to gabapentin and placebo group. Pregabalin can be effectively used as a part of the multimodal analgesic to prevent acute postoperative pain among patients undergoing elective laproscopic cholecystectomy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-257
Author(s):  
Diptesh Aryal ◽  
Renu Gurung ◽  
Moda Nath Marhatta

Background & Objectives: Gabapentin has been used successfully as a non-opioid analgesic adjuvant for postoperative pain management. We hypothesized that the preoperative use of gabapentin prolonged the analgesic effect of epidural morphine without an increase in adverse effects of morphine. Materials & Methods: In a randomized, double blind study sixty ASA PS I and II patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy were assigned to receive either placebo or gabapentin 1200mg 1 hour before surgery. Postoperatively, 0.125% bupivacaine with morphine 50 µg per kg body weight was used for epidural analgesia. Vital parameters, time to the first request for analgesic, visual analogue scale scoring for pain at rest and during movement, 24-hour morphine consumption, and side effects were studied.Results: The patients were comparable with respect to age, weight, ASA PS, baseline hemodynamic parameters and duration of surgery. Gabapentin significantly decreased the duration of analgesia compared to placebo (1078.26 min Vs. 303.5 min; P value <0.0001). The VAS scores at rest and during movement at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24h were significantly lower in gabapentin group. The total amount of morphine consumption in 24 h postoperatively was significantly lower in gabapentin group (1.93mg Vs. 6.30mg; P value <0.0001). The incidence of nausea and pruritus was significantly lower with gabapentin. Conclusion: Oral gabapentin 1200 mg as a premedication decreases the dose requirement of epidural morphine and postoperative pain after total abdominal hysterectomy. It also decreases the pain scores at rest and during movement significantly. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 150 (9) ◽  
pp. 2278-2286
Author(s):  
Ikuko Sasahara ◽  
Akiko Yamamoto ◽  
Masamichi Takeshita ◽  
Yasuyo Suga ◽  
Katsuya Suzuki ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background Multisite pain, including low-back and knee pain, is a major health issue that greatly decreases quality of life. Objectives This study analyzed the effects of l-serine, which provides necessary components for nerve function, and EPA, which exerts anti-inflammatory properties, on pain scores of adults with pain in at least the low back and knee for ≥3 mo. Methods This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. The Japan Low Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JLEQ) and Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM) were applied as primary outcomes. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and safety evaluation were secondary outcomes. We enrolled 120 participants aged ≥20 y (36 men and 84 women: mean ± SD age = 40.8 ± 10.9 y). The participants were randomly allocated to either the active group (daily ingestion of 594 mg l-serine and 149 mg EPA) or placebo group. The study period consisted of 8-wk dosing and 4-wk posttreatment observation. ANCOVA between groups for each time point was conducted using the baseline scores as covariates. Results The JLEQ scores (active compared with placebo: 14.2 ± 11.2 compared with 19.0 ± 10.2) at week 8 were lower in the active group (P &lt; 0.001). The JKOM scores at week 4 (11.7 ± 9.0 compared with 13.9 ± 7.9), week 8 (10.4 ± 7.9 compared with 13.1 ± 7.1), and week 12 (10.3 ± 7.4 compared with 13.8 ± 7.5) were lower in the active group (P ≤ 0.04). Additionally, the active group had 11–27% better scores compared with the placebo group for BPI1 (worst pain), BPI3 (average pain), and BPI5D (pain during moving) at week 4 (P ≤ 0.028) and week 8 (P ≤ 0.019), respectively, and BPI5D was 23% better in the active group at week 12 (P = 0.007). No adverse events were observed. Conclusions l-Serine and EPA were effective for pain relief in adults with low-back and knee pain after multiplicity adjustment. This trial was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000035056.


2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-129
Author(s):  
Arturo Sánchez-Pérez ◽  
Jesús Muñoz-Peñalver ◽  
María José Moya-Villaescusa ◽  
Carmen Sánchez-Matás

The fear of postoperative pain is often mentioned by patients as one of the factors that is most frequently associated with dental implants. To reduce this factor, a single oral dose of 25 mg dexketoprofen trometamol (DKT) or placebo was administered 15 minutes before implant surgery. One hundred patients who required single-implant treatments were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 blinded groups. The patients in the test group were given 25 mg DKT (DKT group), and those in the control group were given 500 mg vitamin C as a placebo (PLACEBO group). A subjective visual analogue scale of 100 mm in length was used to evaluate pain. Inflammation and complications were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. An analysis of variance, t-tests, and a Mann-Whitney U test were performed. Among the 100 patients, 83 completed the study (there were 8 dropouts in the PLACEBO group and 9 in the DKT group). The patients who received DKT reported a lower pain intensity during the immediate postoperative period. The inflammatory response was weaker in the DKT group than the control group at 48 hours, but bleeding was greater. There were no other complications in either of the groups. In conclusion, the preemptive use of 25 mg soluble DKT administered orally 15 minutes before implant surgery can reduce the severity of immediate postoperative pain.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Ibrahim ◽  
Ali M Elnabtity ◽  
Ahmed Hegab ◽  
Omar A. Alnujaidi ◽  
Osama El Sanea

Abstract Background: There is still debate as to whether opioid-free anaesthsia (OFA) may offer additional benefit over multimodal analgesia to better achieve the goals of ERAS(Enhanced recovery after surgery) in bariatric surgery.Patients and method: Patients in the OFA group (n=51) were pre-medicated with IV dexmedetomidine 0.1 µg.kg-1 then induced with propofol (2 mg. kg-1) -ketamine (0.5 mg. kg-1) mixture and maintained on dexmedetomidine 0.5µg. kg-1.h-1, ketamine 0.5 mg.kg-1.h-1, and lidocaine 1 mg. kg-1.h-1. Patients in the MMA(Multimodal analgesia) group (n= 52) were induced using IV propofol 2 mg. kg-1, and fentanyl 1 µg. kg-1. Cisatracurium (0.15 mg.kg-1) was given to all patients for muscle relaxation. Ultrasound-guided bilateral oblique subcostal transverse abdominis plane (OSTAP) block was performed in all patients. The postoperative quality of recovery at 6 and 24 hours was measured as a primary outcome. Postoperative pain control; subsequent opioid consumption; time to ambulate; time to tolerate oral fluid; and time to readiness for discharge were measured as secondary outcomes Results: The total QoR-40 (quality of recovery-40) scores at 6 hours were significantly higher in the OFA group (184.84 versus 180.69 in the MMA group with an estimated difference in mean of -4.15, 95% CI, -5.78 to -2.5, and P ˂0.001. The OFA group tolerated oral fluid intake earlier (194.94, 95% CI, 162.59 to 227.30) versus (273, 95% CI, 223.65 to 322.27) for the MMA group (p value=0.009). Readiness for discharge was significantly quicker in the OFA group (447.49, 95% CI, 409.69 to 485.29 versus 544.56, 95% CI, 503.08 to 586.04 in the MMA group, P-value =0.001). The post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (0 Hour) and the floor 2 and 6-hour numerical rating scales (NRS) for pain were significantly higher in the MMA group. The OFA group needed less opioid rescue analgesia in the PACU and at 24-hours (P value= 0.003 and 0.014; respectively).Conclusion: Combined Opioid free and loco-regional anesthesia provides better early recovery with reduced postoperative pain intensity, and opioid consumption when compared to multimodal analgesia; and is better suited to achieve the goals of ERAS protocol.Clinical trial number: registration number NCT04285255.


Author(s):  
Parveen Kumar Sharma Parveen Kumar Sharma ◽  
Siva Rami Reddy E Siva Rami Reddy E

Aim: Guatteria gaumeri has antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-diabetic activities. In the present randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial is the efficacy of guatteria gaumeri mother tincture in hyperlipidemia. Hyperlipidemia patients meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to the treatment and placebo. Methods: 30 patients in the treatment group took guatteria gaumeri mother tincture; whereas the patients in the placebo group took placebo mother tincture for 12 weeks. The lipid profiles of the patients were evaluated at baseline, and after 6 and 12 weeks of the clinical trial. Results: The final results showed that guatteria gaumeri mother tincture significantly p-value 0.05 and improved LDL, HDL, cholesterol, compared to the placebo group. The guatteria gaumeri showed an inhibitory effect on hepatic enzymes and possible liver toxicity. No serious side effect was reported for guatteria gaumeri mother tincture administration. Therefore, guatteria gaumeri mother tincture could be considered as a supplement for the treatment of dyslipidemia.


This case focuses on the use of local anesthesia, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory or opioid drugs, for laparoscopic cholecystectomy by asking the question: Does prophylactic multimodal nociceptive blockade delay the onset of postoperative pain, decrease analgesic requirements, speed recovery, and facilitate same-day discharge in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy? In this randomized, double-blind study, intraoperative anesthetic care and postoperative pain and nausea management were standardized for all patients. Study groups were similar in terms of patient age, gender, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, baseline and preinduction pain and nausea scores, duration of surgery, and total dose of propofol received. This study demonstrated the benefit of preoperative multimodal analgesia on recovery and discharge.


2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 959-965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrés Zorrilla-Vaca ◽  
Alexander Stone ◽  
Andres Fabricio Caballero-Lozada ◽  
Stephania Paredes ◽  
Michael Conrad Grant

BackgroundMultimodal analgesia is a fundamental part of modern surgery and enhanced recovery pathways. Duloxetine, a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, has been validated for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. The evidence for duloxetine as an adjunct for the treatment of acute postoperative pain remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of duloxetine in the acute perioperative setting.MethodsA literature search was conducted in the major databases (PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating duloxetine compared with placebo control for acute postoperative pain. The primary outcome was postoperative pain assessed at 2, 4, 6, 24 and 48 hours time frames. Secondary outcomes included postoperative opioid administration, as well as side effects, such as postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV), pruritus, dizziness and headache.Results574 patients (n=9 RCTs) were included in the analysis, divided between duloxetine (n=285 patients) and placebo (n=289 patients). Duloxetine use was associated with a significant reduction in pain scores as early as 4 (mean difference (MD) −0.9, 95% CI −1.33 to −0.47) and as late as 48 (MD −0.94, 95% CI −1.56 to −0.33) hours postoperatively compared with placebo. In addition, duloxetine was associated with a significant reduction in opioid administration at 24 (standardized MD (SMD) −2.24, 95% CI −4.28 to −0.19) and 48 (SMD −2.21, 95% CI −4.13 to −0.28) hours as well as a significant reduction in PONV (risk ratio 0.69, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.95, p=0.03) compared with placebo. There was no difference between groups in other side effects.ConclusionDuloxetine, a non-opioid neuromodulator, may provide efficacy for the treatment of acute perioperative pain. Additional prospective studies are required to establish optimal perioperative dosing regimens, role in the setting of a comprehensive multimodal analgesic plan and impact on chronic postsurgical pain.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019121416


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ala Ghobadian ◽  
Saba Mokhtari ◽  
Behnam Shariati ◽  
Leila Kamalzadeh ◽  
Mohsen Shati ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Medications currently recommended for the treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) usually relieve the severity of symptoms by as much as 20–30%, and satisfactory treatment is obtained in 40–60% of patients with OCD. Nevertheless, the remaining symptoms continue to impair the patients’ function. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate possible strategies to improve the mitigation of symptoms.In this study, the main objective was to examine and investigate the effectiveness of granisetron, which is a serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor type 3 (5-HT3) antagonist, as an adjunct therapy to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, for the purpose of ameliorating OCD symptoms. Methods: fifty-eight patients diagnosed with OCD, based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria, who had a Yale-Brown obsessive-compulsive scale (Y-BOCS) score of more than 21 were recruited in a double-blinded, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of 10 weeks to receive either granisetron (1 mg twice daily) and sertraline (100 mg daily initially followed by 200 mg daily after week 4) or placebo and sertraline. The primary outcome was OCD symptoms measured by the Y-BOCS.Results: Y-BOCS total score significantly dropped in both groups (28.9 to 17.7 for granisetron and 27.5 to 19.3 for placebo group with a slightly greater drop for granisetron group), while the granisetron group experienced a significantly greater reduction in obsession scores (Greenhouse-Geisser F(2.32,97.57)=4.52,p-value=0.01). Moreover, in comparison with the placebo group, the proportion of the patients showing complete response was considerably higher among the granisetron group (P-value <0.01). No major adverse effects were observed in any of the groups. Conclusion: The results suggest that granisetron augmentation of sertraline may increase the rate of response in patients with moderate to severe non-refractory OCD. Further studies are suggested in this regard.Trial registration: The trial was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials on 27/03/2019 (www.irct.ir; IRCT ID: IRCT20170123032145N3).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document