scholarly journals The role of national culture as a lens for stakeholder evaluation of corporate social performance and its effect on corporate reputation

2021 ◽  
pp. 234094442110074
Author(s):  
Clara Pérez-Cornejo ◽  
Esther de Quevedo-Puente ◽  
Juan-Bautista Delgado-García
Keyword(s):  
National Culture ◽  
Corporate Reputation ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Cultural Dimensions ◽  
Perceptions And Expectations ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Relationship

Studies have shown that corporate social performance (CSP) is an antecedent of corporate reputation, acting as a signal that affects stakeholders’ perceptions and expectations about a firm’s future behavior. However, the perceptions, expectations, and interests of stakeholders may be affected by external factors, such as national culture, which shapes their beliefs about what role companies play in society. Drawing on institutional theory and Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, we analyze how stakeholders’ national culture moderates the relationship between CSP and corporate reputation. The results of the analysis of an international sample for the period 2010 to 2016 show that low individualism (i.e., collectivism), low masculinity (i.e., femininity), low power distance, and low uncertainty avoidance intensify the positive relationship between CSP and corporate reputation. JEL CLASSIFICATION: M14, L14

scholarly journals Perceptions and expectations of corporate social responsibility: Theoretical issues and empirical findings

2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A.L. Coldwell
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Explanatory Models ◽  
Student Expectations ◽  
Black And White ◽  
Individual Perceptions ◽  
Perceptions And Expectations ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Theoretical Issues

This paper focuses on the issue of differences in individual perceptions and expectations of corporate social performance (CSP). Business research has indicated, somewhat equivocally, that there is evidence to support possible causal relationships between CSP, corporate reputation (CR) and financial performance (CFP). The paper analyses these relationships with regard to various causal explanatory models delineated by Carroll and Buchholtz (2000). Specifically, the paper considers the theoretical possibility of CR being a moderating variable in the relationship between CSP and CFP.The paper reports the findings of an empirical study of University students’ perceptions regarding CSP in South Africa, which show that significant differences between black and white student expectations of CSP exist. The findings are discussed with regard to building a tentative theoretical model of CR.

Corporate social performance in family firms: a meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Canavati
Keyword(s):  
Family Firms ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Family ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose Empirical studies provide conflicting conclusions regarding the corporate social performance (CSP) of family firms. The purpose of this paper is to synthesize the existing empirical evidence and examine the potential role of research design and contextual factors. Design/methodology/approach A meta-analysis of existing empirical studies was performed to examine the role of sampling, measurement and contextual factors in explaining the different and often conflicting results of empirical studies in the family business literature. Findings The overall relationship between family firms and CSP is positive. The relationship between family firms and CSP is positive for private family firms but is negative for public family firms. The relationship between family firms and CSP is positive when family involvement includes both family ownership and management as opposed to only family ownership or family management. Private family firms care more and public family firms care less about the community, environment, and employees than private and public nonfamily firms. The relationship between family firms and CSP is stronger in institutional environments with weak labor and corporate governance regulatory frameworks. Research limitations/implications The operationalization of both the family firm and CSP constructs significantly predicts the magnitude and direction of the relationship between family firms and CSP. Practical implications Family firms should become more skilled at measuring and disseminating information about the firm’s CSP. Family firms should work to improve public perceptions about the CSP of family firms. Social implications Policy should encourage family firms to remain privately owned by the family. Policy should also incentivize the involvement of family owners in the management of family firms. Originality/value Although several literature reviews address the relationship between family firms and CSP, this is the first review to use the meta-analysis method. The authors contribute to the family business literature by analyzing how differences in study-, firm- and country-level factors can explain some of the variance in the results of the studies in the literature.

“Being true to oneself”: the interplay of responsible leadership and authenticity on multi-level outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muzhar Javed ◽  
Muhammad Waheed Akhtar ◽  
Khalid Hussain ◽  
Muhammad Junaid ◽  
Fauzia Syed
Keyword(s):  
Social Capital ◽  
Research Design ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Responsible Leadership ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Multi Level ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Relationship

PurposeDrawing on stakeholder theory, this study examines the relationship between responsible leadership and its macro-, meso- and micro-level outcomes. Further, this study investigates the moderating role of authenticity on the relationship between responsible leadership and its multi-level effects, i.e. relational social capital, corporate social performance and community citizenship behaviour among employees.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted four field studies using the quantitative methodology to test the hypotheses. In study 1 (N = 236), by adopting a multi-wave and multi-source research design, the authors examine the relationship between responsible leadership, authenticity and relational social capital. In study 2 (N = 203), by adopting a multi-wave research design, the authors examine the relationship between responsible leadership, authenticity and corporate social performance. In study 3 (N = 203), by adopting a multi-wave and multi-source research design, the authors examine the relationship between responsible leadership, authenticity and employees' community citizenship behaviour. In study 4 (N = 257), by adopting a multi-wave and multi-source research design, the authors capture the impact of responsible leadership on outcomes (social capital, corporate social performance and community citizenship behaviour) with a boundary condition of authenticity.FindingsThe authors find that responsible leadership enhances relational social capital, improves a firm's social performance and develops community citizenship behaviour among employees. Further, the study finds that authenticity positively moderates the relationship between responsible leadership and its multi-level outcomes.Originality/valueFirst, it is a maiden study to investigate the multi-level outcomes of RL in a series of three empirical studies. Second, it contributes to RL literature by testing a unique moderating role of authenticity between RL and its multi-level outcomes of relational social capital, corporate social performance and employees' community citizenship behaviour. This study also provides empirical evidence for the multi-level implications of stakeholder theory.

scholarly journals The effects and determinants of extensive disclosure: evidence from Japan

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-224
Author(s):  
Yuko Kitora ◽  
Shin’ya Okuda
Keyword(s):  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Corporate Reputation ◽  
Corporate Strategy ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Positive Attitudes ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Relationship

It is believed to be increasingly important for firms to be engaged in extensive disclosure in Japan. This paper simultaneously investigates the relationship between Corporate Social Performance (CSP) and corporate attitude toward extensive disclosure and between corporate attitude toward extensive disclosure and corporate reputation. We find that corporate attitudes toward extensive disclosure and CSP are positively correlated and that corporate attitudes toward extensive disclosure and corporate reputation are positively correlated. This evidence indicates that firms are engaged in extensive disclosure as a component of their corporate strategy in social responsibility activities and that those with more positive attitudes toward extensive disclosure appear to be able to develop and maintain better relationships with their various stakeholders.

scholarly journals Does Board of Directors Independence Behave Opportunistically or Ethically? Study Corporation Social Responsibility and Earning Management in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (02) ◽  
pp. 75-85
Author(s):  
Muhammad Taufik ◽  
Gideon Benhans
Keyword(s):  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Sustainability Reporting ◽  
Ethical Values ◽  
The One ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
A Company

ABSTRACT This paper explores the opportunistic issues of EM and ethical issues of CSR where we aim to examine the relationship between CSR and EM and involve the role of BOD independence. Investigation of the relationship using corporate social performance theory where the research sample is a company that publishes sustainability reporting - GRI index for the period 2016 to 2019 in Indonesia. CSR does not affect EM, on the contrary, BOD independence has a positive and significant effect on EM. That is, BOD independence behaves opportunistically. Another finding is that BOD independence does not strengthen or weaken the relationship between CSR and EM. Therefore, despite being opportunistic, BOD independence does not use CSR as a reflection of ethical values to cover EM practices. This paper contributes to showing that BOD independence has 2 characters, namely opportunist on the one hand and ethical on the other.

Revisiting the financial performance – corporate social performance link

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 2586-2602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serin Choi ◽  
Seoki Lee
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Agency Theory ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Moderating Role

Purpose The existing literature has focused heavily on investigating the effect of corporate social performance (CSP) on financial performance (FP) but has not paid sufficient attention to an inverse causation of the relationship. Moreover, while some of the literature argues that FP positively affects CSP, based on the slack resources theory, others have found negative effects of FP on CSP, supporting the managerial opportunism perspective. Thus, this paper aims to address the impact of FP on CSP. Further, this study examines the moderating role of franchising to better understand the relationship. Design/methodology/approach This study uses and expands the models derived from the CSP literature to confirm the effects of FP on CSP with the moderating role of franchising within the restaurant industry. Using two-way fixed effects models, it effectively addresses important problems embedded in the panel data. Findings The findings show a positive effect of FP on CSP, which is inconsistent with Park and Lee’s (2009) findings and supports the slack resources theory. Further, the interesting results show that the impact of FP on CSP diminishes as a firm franchises more, supporting the double-sided moral hazard framework of the agency theory. Originality/value This paper fills the lacuna in both the existing literature on the relationship between CSP and FP and the franchising. This study contributes to enhancing restaurant practitioners’ understanding of the double-sided moral hazard of agency theory unique to franchising context.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document