scholarly journals Allies Welcomed to Advance Racial Equity (AWARE) Faculty Seminar Series: Program Design and Implementation

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 238212052110349
Author(s):  
Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds ◽  
Chemen Neal ◽  
Anthony Shanks ◽  
Nicole Scott ◽  
Sharon Robertson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emotional Labor ◽  
Faculty Of Color ◽  
Racial Equity ◽  
Structural Racism ◽  
White Faculty ◽  
Black And White ◽  
Point Of Entry ◽  
Seminar Series ◽  
Departmental Climate ◽  
Group Sharing

Introduction: In the wake of George Floyd’s murder, White faculty in our department began to express the desire to gain a greater understanding of structural racism and racial inequity. To facilitate this learning, support allyship, and mitigate the emotional labor and taxation that frequently falls on faculty of color to respond to these appeals, we developed AWARE (Allies Welcomed to Advance Racial Equity), a faculty seminar series primarily designed for and led by a majority White faculty to tackle the topics of structural racism, Whiteness, and Anti-racist action. Methods: We developed a 6-session seminar series, identifying 5 White faculty as lecturers and a cadre of Black and White volunteer facilitators, to lead 60-minute sessions comprised of lecture, facilitated small group reflection, and large group sharing, that reviewed key topics/texts on structural racism, Whiteness, and Anti-racism. Results: Attendance ranged from 26 to 37 participants at each session. About 80% of faculty participated in at least 1 session of the program. The majority of participants (85%) felt “more empowered to influence their current environment to be more inclusive of others” and were “better equipped to advocate for themselves or others.” Most (81%) felt “more connected to their colleagues following completion of the program.” Ultimately, faculty thought highly of the program upon completion with 26/27 (96%) stating they would recommend the program to a colleague. Discussion: We offer a reproducible model to improve departmental climate by engaging in the shared labor of educating our colleagues and communities about structural racism, Whiteness, and Anti-racism to create a point of entry into reflection, dialogue, and deliberate actions for change.

scholarly journals Quantifying the contribution of occupational segregation to racial disparities in health: A gap-closing perspective

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Lundberg
Keyword(s):  
Racial Disparities ◽  
Occupational Segregation ◽  
Structural Racism ◽  
Black And White ◽  
Causal Assumptions ◽  
Micro Level ◽  
White Workers ◽  
Racial Disparities In Health ◽  
Population Disparity ◽  
Gap Closing

Racism causes racial disparities in health, and structural racism has many components. Focusing on one of those components, this paper addresses occupational segregation. I document high onset of work-limiting disabilities in occupations where many workers identify as non-Hispanic Black or as Hispanic. I then pivot to a causal question. Suppose we took a sample from the population and reassigned their occupations to be a function of education alone. To what degree would health disparities narrow for that sample? Using observational data, I estimate that the disparity between non-Hispanic Black and white workers would narrow by one-third. This estimate is credible because of adjustment for lagged measures of demographics, human capital, and health carried out under transparent causal assumptions. The result contributes to understanding about inequality and health by quantifying the contribution of occupational segregation to a disparity: if we took a sample and reassigned occupations, the disparity would narrow but would not disappear. The paper contributes to methodology by illustrating an approach to macro-level claims (how segregation affects a population disparity) that draws on explicitly causal micro-level analyses (potential outcomes for individuals) for which data are abundant.

scholarly journals Application of an antiracism lens in the field of implementation science (IS): Recommendations for reframing implementation research with a focus on justice and racial equity

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 263348952110494
Author(s):  
Rachel C. Shelton ◽  
Prajakta Adsul ◽  
April Oh ◽  
Nathalie Moise ◽  
Derek M. Griffith
Keyword(s):  
Implementation Science ◽  
Health Equity ◽  
Implementation Research ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Health Inequities ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Racial Equity ◽  
Structural Racism ◽  
Core Elements ◽  
Evaluation Approaches

Background Despite the promise of implementation science (IS) to reduce health inequities, critical gaps and opportunities remain in the field to promote health equity. Prioritizing racial equity and antiracism approaches is critical in these efforts, so that IS does not inadvertently exacerbate disparities based on the selection of frameworks, methods, interventions, and strategies that do not reflect consideration of structural racism and its impacts. Methods Grounded in extant research on structural racism and antiracism, we discuss the importance of advancing understanding of how structural racism as a system shapes racial health inequities and inequitable implementation of evidence-based interventions among racially and ethnically diverse communities. We outline recommendations for explicitly applying an antiracism lens to address structural racism and its manifests through IS. An anti-racism lens provides a framework to guide efforts to confront, address, and eradicate racism and racial privilege by helping people identify racism as a root cause of health inequities and critically examine how it is embedded in policies, structures, and systems that differentially affect racially and ethnically diverse populations. Results We provide guidance for the application of an antiracism lens in the field of IS, focusing on select core elements in implementation research, including: (1) stakeholder engagement; (2) conceptual frameworks and models; (3) development, selection, adaptation of EBIs; (4) evaluation approaches; and (5) implementation strategies. We highlight the need for foundational grounding in antiracism frameworks among implementation scientists to facilitate ongoing self-reflection, accountability, and attention to racial equity, and provide questions to guide such reflection and consideration. Conclusion We conclude with a reflection on how this is a critical time for IS to prioritize focus on justice, racial equity, and real-world equitable impact. Moving IS towards making consideration of health equity and an antiracism lens foundational is central to strengthening the field and enhancing its impact. Plain language abstract There are important gaps and opportunities that exist in promoting health equity through implementation science. Historically, the commonly used frameworks, measures, interventions, strategies, and approaches in the field have not been explicitly focused on equity, nor do they consider the role of structural racism in shaping health and inequitable delivery of evidence-based practices/programs. This work seeks to build off of the long history of research on structural racism and health, and seeks to provide guidance on how to apply an antiracism lens to select core elements of implementation research. We highlight important opportunities for the field to reflect and consider applying an antiracism approach in: 1) stakeholder/community engagement; 2) use of conceptual frameworks; 3) development, selection and adaptation of evidence-based interventions; 4) evaluation approaches; 5) implementation strategies (e.g., how to deliver evidence-based practices, programs, policies); and 6) how researchers conduct their research, with a focus on racial equity. This is an important time for the field of implementation science to prioritize a foundational focus on justice, equity, and real-world impact through the application of an anti-racism lens in their work.

scholarly journals An analysis of the intersections between race and class in representations of Black and white gay men in QueerLife

Image & Text ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kudzaiishe Peter Vanyoro
Keyword(s):  
South African ◽  
Gay Men ◽  
Gay Identity ◽  
Structural Racism ◽  
Shape Representations ◽  
Race And Class ◽  
Black And White ◽  
White Middle Class ◽  
Black Bodies ◽  
Gay Identities

ABSTRACT This article seeks to critically analyse how intersections of race and class shape representations of Black and white gay men in QueerLife, a South African online magazine. It focuses on QueerLife's '4men' section and how its content represents classed and raced gay identities. My argument is that QueerLife forwards racialised and classed representations of the gay lifestyle, which reinforce homonormalisation within what is known as the "Pink Economy". Using Critical Diversity Literacy (CDL) to read the underlying meanings in texts and images, the article concludes that QueerLife is complicit in the construction of gay identity categories that seek to appeal to urban, white, middle-class gay-identifying communities in South Africa. The article also demonstrates how, when Black bodies are represented in QueerLife, exceptionalism mediates their visibility in this online magazine. Overall, the findings demonstrate how Black and white gay bodies are mediated online and how their different racial visibilities are negotiated within the system of structural racism. Keywords: Class, gayness, Pink Economy, QueerLife, representation, racism.

Structural Racism and the Transition to Adulthood of Black and White Brazilians

2021 ◽  
pp. 83-100
Author(s):  
Luciana Dutra-Thomé ◽  
Jeanice da Cunha Ozorio ◽  
Anderson Siqueira Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Transition To Adulthood ◽  
Structural Racism ◽  
Black And White

scholarly journals Prioritizing Racial Equity: How Efforts to Advance Racial Equity Helped Shape the W.K. Kellogg Food & Fitness Initiative

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 24S-33S
Author(s):  
Mary M. Lee ◽  
Amanda Navarro
Keyword(s):  
Policy Making ◽  
Social Institutions ◽  
The United States ◽  
Community Partnerships ◽  
Racial Equity ◽  
Structural Racism ◽  
Community Residents ◽  
Policy Making Process ◽  
Authentic Community ◽  
Demographic Shifts

Racial equity is closely linked to principles of fairness and justice. It is distinct from the concept of racial equality. Community engaged strategies aimed at creating racial equity have generated effective ways to dismantle structural racism—the racialized policies and practices that have shaped economic and social institutions in the United States throughout its history. In crafting the Food & Fitness Initiative, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation made advancing racial equity a top priority. By doing so, it encouraged the community partnerships funded under the initiative to apply theories of expanding equity to real-world situations in order to reduce racial disparities in their neighborhoods. This article reviews the methods that were employed over the course of the initiative to support the partnerships with their efforts. It highlights three key components: (1) being intentional about maintaining a focus on racial equity, (2) concentrating on changing policies and systems, and (3) consistently incorporating meaningful and authentic community engagement into the work. The importance of making the concept of equity concrete and measurable is explored. Furthermore, the article discusses strategies that strengthened the capacity of the partnerships to navigate the policy-making process and to build leadership and shift power to community residents. The article concludes by detailing measures that could guide future efforts to make racial equity a priority and emphasizes that doing so is crucial given the rapid demographic shifts underway across the country.

Counting heads vs making heads count

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 780-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Vargas ◽  
Amy Seon Westmoreland ◽  
Kathrina Robotham ◽  
Fiona Lee
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Faculty Of Color ◽  
Faculty Members ◽  
Racial Climate ◽  
Organizational Diversity ◽  
Data Set ◽  
White Faculty ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Primary Driver

Purpose Research on organizational diversity initiatives generally focus on either numerical diversity or racial climate. Both facets of diversity are critical, however, research has rarely examined their impact simultaneously. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach In the current study, the authors use the context of higher education, to examine how variations in the composite of numerical diversity and racial climate predict psychological disparities between faculty of color (FOC) and White faculty. The authors test how institutions that engage in authentic diversity (i.e. institutions that are both numerically diverse and have a positive racial climate) compare to other diversity composites. Findings Using a data set of n=37,406 faculty members in US colleges/universities, this study found that racial disparities between FOC and White faculty for various psychological outcomes are smaller in authentic diversity institutions compared to institutions with low numeric diversity/ poor racial climate. Further, the data demonstrate that authentic diversity institutions have reduced psychological disparities compared to institutions with high numeric diversity/poor racial climate, but have similar disparities to institutions with low numeric/positive racial climate. Originality/value These results suggest that diversity climate may be the primary driver of mitigating psychological disparities between FOC and White faculty. However, it is necessary for institutions to authentically engage in diversity – by promoting both entities – to become more effective in reducing disparities.

scholarly journals Historical redlining and contemporary racial disparities in neighborhood life expectancy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Graetz ◽  
Michael Esposito
Keyword(s):  
Life Expectancy ◽  
Capital Accumulation ◽  
Financial Risk ◽  
Later Life ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Structural Racism ◽  
Black And White ◽  
Political Economies ◽  
Professional Class ◽  
Racialized Violence

While evidence suggests a durable association between redlining and population health, we lack an empirical account of how this historical act of racialized violence produced contemporary inequities. In this paper, we use a mediation framework to evaluate how redlining grades influenced later life expectancy and the degree to which contemporary racialized disparities in life expectancy between Black working-class neighborhoods and white professional-class neighborhoods can be explained by past HOLC mapping. Life expectancy gaps between differently graded tracts are driven by urban renewal, economic isolation, and property valuation that developed within these areas in subsequent decades. Still, only a small fraction of the total disparity between contemporary Black and white neighborhoods is predicted by HOLC grades. We discuss the role of these maps in analyses of structural racism, positioning them as only one feature of the larger public-private project of conflating race with financial risk. Policy implications include targeting resources to formerly redlined neighborhoods, but also dismantling broader racist logics of capital accumulation codified in more abstracted political economies of place.

Reflection, Realization, and Reaffirmation: Voices of Black and White Faculty Members Engaged in Cross-Racial Mentoring

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 205-215
Author(s):  
Dave A. Louis ◽  
Scott D. Michel ◽  
Jennifer E. Deranek ◽  
Sarah L. Louis
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Members ◽  
White Faculty ◽  
Black And White

Preventing Intimate Partner Homicide: The Long Road Ahead

2021 ◽  
pp. 108876792110484
Author(s):  
Jill Theresa Messing ◽  
Millan AbiNader ◽  
Tricia Bent-Goodley ◽  
Jacquelyn Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Black Women ◽  
Social Service ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Service Systems ◽  
Research Practice ◽  
Intimate Partner Homicide ◽  
Racial Equity ◽  
Structural Racism ◽  
Factors Associated

Intimate partner homicide (IPH) consists primarily of men killing women in the context of intimate partner violence. Researchers have described and identified risk factors associated with IPH; additional comprehensive data collection is needed to better understand IPH risk and to develop risk-informed prevention. Due to structural racism, available interventions within the criminal legal and social service systems may be eschewed by those—such as Black women—who are at the highest risk. Anti-racist research, practice, and policy are key to reducing IPH. Gender and racial equity, combined with fostering relational health leads, ultimately, down the long road to IPH prevention.

Facing the Nation and the University: A Model for Institutional Transformation

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscilla Leiva
Keyword(s):  
Racial Formation ◽  
Research Topic ◽  
Faculty Of Color ◽  
Institutional Transformation ◽  
The Political ◽  
Civic Responsibility ◽  
Black And White ◽  
The University ◽  
Do So

This essay responds to Sánchez’s invitation to start in a specific place to consider a larger story in order to describe his impact as both a scholar and an institution builder. This essay will do so by putting two of his pieces in conversation: “Face the Nation,” which offers new conceptual frameworks to understand a multiracial society, and “Crossing Figueroa: The Tangled Web of Diversity and Democracy,” in which he theorizes the role of the university and the struggle for democracy both inside and outside its walls. By reading these two pieces together, scholars of racial formation may gain insight regarding three critical interventions that the field now takes for granted. First, multiracial interaction is regularly a research topic that complicates binaries of Black and white because Sánchez, his colleagues, and his predecessors began asking different questions about race. His students have been central to pushing the edges of the field, proving that good mentorship is more than generosity. Second, the fact that Sánchez, a preeminent historian, engages multiple fields in theorizing multiracial interaction demonstrates the political urgency of reading and writing beyond the discipline. Lastly, Sánchez’s efforts to diversify university faculty and create conditions of success for faculty of color is central to making the university live up to its promises of civic responsibility and democracy. Ultimately, his body of work both on and off the page demonstrates his importance in bringing different worlds, disciplines, and individuals together.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document