scholarly journals Effect of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Complication and Reoperation Rates of Ankle Arthrodesis and Total Ankle Arthroplasty

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0049
Author(s):  
William Tucker ◽  
Brandon Morris ◽  
Armin Tarakemeh ◽  
Scott Mullen ◽  
Paul Schroeppel ◽  
...  

Category: Diabetes Introduction/Purpose: Diabetes mellitus (DM) poses a risk for increased rate of complications in many orthopaedic procedures, especially in patients undergoing elective arthroplasty procedures. Treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis includes both arthroplasty and arthrodesis. Current literature provides minimal guidance regarding outcomes of total ankle replacement (TAR) or ankle arthrodesis (AA) in diabetic patients. The authors of this study utilized a large database to compare rates of postoperative complications and reoperations of diabetic patients undergoing surgical management of ankle arthritis to rates seen in non-diabetic patients. Methods: Using the PearlDiver Technologies, Inc. database, Medicare patients diagnosed with ankle arthritis using ICD-9 codes were identified from 2005 to 2014. Patients were then sorted as diabetic or non-diabetic. Diabetic patients were then further stratified into Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and Type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Type 2 diabetics requiring insulin (T2ID) and not requiring insulin (T2NID) were also isolated. Patients were identified who underwent either AA or TAR utilizing ICD-9 procedure and CPT codes. These groups were evaluated for postoperative complications and reoperation rates. Chi-Squared testing was used to determine significance. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine whether diabetes represents an independent risk factor. Results: 1477 diabetic patients underwent TAR and 5399 underwent AA versus 3900 TAR and 7838 AA in nondiabetics. Diabetics undergoing AA experienced complications at 32.2%, reoperations at 30.8%, and revisions at 18.7% versus 13.3%, 22.3%, and 19.2% respectively in patients without diabetes(P<0.05). In diabetics undergoing TAR, the complication rate was 21.6% and reoperation rates were 16.9% versus 12.5% and 13% respectively in their non-diabetic counterparts(P<0.05). Revision rates were similar. Patients with T1DM had more reoperations and complications in both TAR and AA compared to those with T2DM (P<0.05). In both surgical groups, Patients with T2ID had more complications and reoperations than those with T2NID(P<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed diabetes as an independent risk factor for complication and reoperation in AA but only complication in TAR(P <0.05). Conclusion: Patients with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus experienced higher complication and total reoperation rates when undergoing either TAR or AA. T1DM appears to impart a greater risk of surgical complication and repeat surgical intervention than does T2DM. However when insulin is required in T2DM, complication and reoperation rates are similar to those of T1DM. Patient selection for surgical management of end-stage ankle arthritis should incorporate diabetic type and insulin dependency when considering surgical intervention.

2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (05) ◽  
pp. 277-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Škrha Jr ◽  
M. Kalousová ◽  
J. Švarcová ◽  
A. Muravská ◽  
J. Kvasnička ◽  
...  

AbstractReceptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) plays the essential role in the pathogenesis of diabetic vascular complications. The aim of the study was to compare concentration of soluble RAGE and its ligands (EN-RAGE and HMGB1) with different biochemical parameters in Type 1 (T1DM) and Type 2 (T2DM) diabetes mellitus.Total number of 154 persons (45 T1DM, 68 T2DM, 41 controls) was examined and concentrations of sRAGE, EN-RAGE and HMGB1 were measured and compared to diabetes control, albuminuria, cell adhesion molecules and metalloproteinases (MMPs).Mean serum sRAGE concentration was higher in T1DM as compared to controls (1137±532 ng/l vs. 824±309 ng/l, p<0.01). Similarly, EN-RAGE was significantly higher in both diabetic groups (p<0.001) and HMGB1 concentrations were elevated in T2DM patients (p<0.01). Significant relationship was found between MMP9 and HMGB1 and EN-RAGE in diabetic patients. Inverse relationship was observed between MMP2 and MMP9 in both types of diabetic patients (r= − 0.602, p<0.002 and r= − 0.771, p<0.001). Significant positive correlation was found between sRAGE and ICAM-1, VCAM-1 or vWF (p<0.01 to p<0.001).We conclude that serum sRAGE and RAGE ligands concentrations reflect endothelial dysfunction developing in diabetes.


2020 ◽  
pp. 193864002095018
Author(s):  
William A. Tucker ◽  
Brandon L. Barnds ◽  
Brandon L. Morris ◽  
Armin Tarakemeh ◽  
Scott Mullen ◽  
...  

Background Surgical management of end-stage ankle arthritis consists of either ankle arthrodesis (AA) or total ankle replacement (TAR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate utilization trends in TAR and AA and compare cost and complications. Methods Medicare patients with the diagnosis of ankle arthritis were reviewed. Patients undergoing surgical intervention were split into AA and TAR groups, which were evaluated for trends as well as postoperative complications, revision rates, and procedure cost. Results A total of 673 789 patients were identified with ankle arthritis. A total of 19 120 patients underwent AA and 9059 underwent TAR. While rates of AA remained relatively constant, even decreasing, with 2080 performed in 2005 and 1823 performed in 2014, TAR rates nearly quadrupled. Average cost associated with TAR was $12559.12 compared with $6962.99 for AA ( P < .001). Overall complication rates were 24.9% in the AA group with a 16.5% revision rate compared with 15.1% and 11.0%, respectively, in the TAR group ( P < .001). Patients younger than 65 years had both higher complication and revision rates. Discussion TAR has become an increasingly popular option for the management of end-stage ankle arthritis. In our study, TAR demonstrated both lower revision and complication rates than AA. However, TAR represents a more expensive treatment option. Levels of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective comparative study


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 525-534
Author(s):  
E. Yu. Lomakina ◽  
O. V. Taratina ◽  
E. A. Belousova

Background: For a long time there has been a discussion about how chronic pancreatitis (CP) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are related to each other. If a patient has both conditions, should they be viewed as two separate disorders, or one of them is a plausible consequence of the other? If the latter is true, what are pathophysiological mechanisms of DM in CP? Current consensus documents by specialists in pancreatic diseases pay little attention to this issue, and their main statements have low level of evidence. The Russian consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of CP (2016) contains no statements on DM. In the Russian guidelines and consensus documents to be developed, it is necessary to include provisions on the pancreatogenic DM as an independent “other type DM’, with consideration of its pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical particulars.Aim: To characterize the state-of-the-art in pancreatogenic DM, to demonstrate its differences from DM types 1 and 2 from pathogenetic and clinical perspectives.Methods: The review is based on the results of meta-analyses, systematic reviews and main provisions of the existing clinical guidelines and consensus documents available from PubMed and E-library.Results: According to various sources, Type 3c DM, or latent impaired glucose tolerance in CP, can eventually develop in 25 to 80% patients with CP. Impaired glucose tolerance is found in 40 to 60% of patients with acute pancreatitis, with persistent hyperglycemia after acute episode seen in 15 to 18% of the patients. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency is commonly seen in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients, although the data on its prevalence are highly contradictory indicating a lack of knowledge in the field. Type 3c DM is characterized by its manifestation at later stages of CP, concomitant excretory deficiency of the pancreas, brittle course with proneness to hypoglycemia and no ketoacidosis. The highest risk group includes patients with longstanding CP, previous partial pancreatic resection and patients with early calcifying pancreatitis, mainly of the alcoholic origin. Optimal and rational medical treatment of pancreatogenic DM still remains disputable, while the evidence base of the efficacy and safety of various anti-diabetic agents in this disease is lacking, and no consensus on the issue has been yet reached. General treatment guidelines given in a number of international consensus documents are limited to cautious insulin administration.Conclusion: Pancreatogenic DM differs from Type 1 and Type 2 DM in a number of aspects, namely, mechanisms of hyperglycemia, hormonal profiles, clinical particulars and treatment approaches. Endocrine pancreatic insufficiency in CP is caused by secondary inflammatory injury of the pancreatic islets. The key to specifics of Type 3c DM lies in anatomical and physiological interplay of the exocrine and endocrine compartments of the pancreas. At presents, most provisions on pancreatogenic DM are empirical and seem to be rather declarative, because intrinsic mechanisms of this type of diabetes and moreover its pathogenetically based treatment have been poorly studied. Nevertheless, all patients with CP or other pancreatic diseases should be assessed for pancreatogenic DM.


2001 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliška Marklová

Practically all types of diabetes mellitus (DM) result from complex interactions of genetic and environmental factors. Multifactorial and polygenic Type 1 DM is strongly influenced by genes controlling the immune system, mainly HLA-DQ and DR. In addition to this, many other predisposition loci, interacting with each other, have some influence on susceptibility to DM. Heterogeneous Type 2 DM, accounting for about 85 % of all diabetic patients, is supposed to be induced by multiple genes defects involved in insulin action and/or insulin secretion. Other genetically influenced traits like obesity and hyperlipidemia are strongly associated with the Type 2. The group called Other specific types of DM include monogenic forms MODY 1-5 and many various subtypes of the disease, where the specific gene mutations have been identified. Both genetic and intrauterine environmental influences are likely to contribute to the abnormalities defined as Gestational DM.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Dagogo-Jack

The long-term complications of diabetes mellitus include retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy. Diabetic retinopathy can result in loss of vision; nephropathy may lead to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD); and neuropathy poses the risk of foot ulcers, amputation, Charcot joints, sexual dysfunction, and potentially disabling dysfunction of the stomach, bowel, and bladder. Hyperglycemia sufficient to cause pathologic and functional changes in target tissues may be present for some time before clinical symptoms lead to a diagnosis of diabetes, especially in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetic patients are also at increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular, peripheral vascular, and cerebrovascular disease. These conditions may be related to hyperglycemia, as well as to the hypertension and abnormal lipoprotein profiles that are often found in diabetic patients. Prevention of these complications is a major goal of current therapeutic policy and recommendations for all but transient forms of diabetes. This chapter describes the pathogenesis, screening, prevention, and treatment of diabetic complications, as well as the management of hyperglycemia in the hospitalized patient. Figures illustrate the pathways that link high blood glucose levels to microvascular and macrovascular complications; fundus abnormalities in diabetic retinopathy; the natural history of nephropathy in type 1 diabetes; cumulative incidence of first cardiovascular events, stroke, or death from cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes; the effect of intensive glycemic therapy on the risk of myocardial infarction, major cardiovascular event, or cardiovascular death in patients with type 2 diabetes; and risk of death in patients with type 2 diabetes who receive intensive therapy of multiple risk factors or conventional therapy. Tables describe screening schedules for diabetic complications in adults, foot care recommendations for patients with diabetes, and comparison of major trials of intensive glucose control. This chapter has 238 references.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Galawezh Othman

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of different types of Diabetes Mellitus; the data collected from 84 patients randomly in Layla Qasem Diabetic center in Erbil city to study some genetic factors on Diabetes Mellitus disease by depend on their ages, gender, family history, Blood group and albumin in urine. In case of age average of their age was 40% between 50_60 years old and by depending on their Gender, average of genders 70% was female and 30% male in type 2, while in type 1 40% female and 60% male. The relationship between their family strain 43% of them was positive in type 2DM, and 50% positive in type 1DM. Then we compared their blood group according to our results 39 % of them was O blood group,  and in case of albumin in their urine ,in type 2 DM 35% was 30mg/l ,37% was 10mg/l, 9% was 150mg/l, and  19% was 80 mg/l .also in type 1DM 43% was 10mg/l, 11% was 150mg/l, 33% was 30 mg/l, and  13% 80mg/l . We concluded that Diabetes Mellitus in our area is more common in female than male, the percentage of the diabetes increased with age and most diabetic patients have O blood Group.


2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bancha Satirapoj ◽  
Sharon G. Adler

Background: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) often results in end-stage renal disease, and this is the most common reason for initiation of dialysis in the United States. Complications of diabetes, particularly renal disease, substantially increase the risk of subsequent severe illness and death. The prevalence of DN is still rising dramatically, with concomitant increases in associated mortality and cardiovascular complications. Summary: Renal involvement in type 1 and type 2 diabetes reflects a complex pathogenesis. Various genetic and environmental factors determine the susceptibility and progression to advanced stages of the disease. DN should be considered in patients who have had type 1 diabetes for at least 10 years with microalbuminuria and diabetic retinopathy, as well as in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes with macroalbuminuria in whom other causes for proteinuria are absent. The glomerular characteristic features include mesangial expansion, thickened glomerular basement membrane, and hyalinosis of arterioles. The optimal therapy of DN continues to evolve. For all diabetic patients, practical management including blood glucose and blood pressure control with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockade combined with lipid control, dietary salt restriction, lowering the dietary protein intake, increased physical activity, weight reduction, and smoking cessation can reduce the rate of progression of nephropathy and cardiovascular disease. Key Messages: DN is a complex disease linking hemodynamic and metabolic pathways with oxidative stress, and systemic inflammation. We summarize the current evidence of epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, and the current management of DN in Western countries. Facts from East and West: The prevalence of DN is increasing in Asia and Western countries alike. The deletion (D) allele of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene is associated with progression to end-stage renal disease in Asian patients with DN, but this association is uncertain in Europeans. An association between DN and polymorphism of the gene coding for acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase β has been reported in Asian and Western populations. Both in Japan and the US, criteria for diagnosis are a 5-year history of diabetes and persistent albuminuria. Renal biopsy should be done in patients with severe hematuria, cellular casts and - in the US - hepatitis and HIV to rule out other pathologies. Diabetic retinopathy is considered a key criterion in Japan, but the absence of it does not rule out DN in the US. Enlargement of the kidney is observed as a diagnostic criterion in Japan. The differential use of renal biopsy as diagnostic tool might account for a different prevalence between Asian countries. Some Japanese diabetic patients show typical histological alterations for DN with a normal ACR and GFR. The clinical classification is similar between Japan and the US including five stages based on ACR and GFR. The Japanese guidelines do not include blood pressure values for the classification of DN. Guidelines for DN treatment are evolving quickly both in Asia and Western countries based on the numerous clinical trials performed worldwide. Targeting the angiotensin system for its hemodynamic and nonhemodynamic effects is a common approach. DPP-4 inhibitors are widely used in Japan and might have a higher glucose-lowering effect in Asian patients due to their specific diet. A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study has been launched to assess the efficacy of the Chinese herbal tea extract Shenyan Kangfu in DN.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document