scholarly journals Detection of MRD may predict the outcome of patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive ALL treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors plus chemotherapy

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (7) ◽  
pp. 1214-1221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Jeffrey L. Jorgensen ◽  
Deborah A. Thomas ◽  
Susan O’Brien ◽  
Rebecca Garris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Treatment Intensification ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive

Abstract From 2001 to 2011, 122 patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia were treated with chemotherapy + imatinib (n = 54) or + dasatinib (n = 68). One hundred fifteen (94%) achieved complete remission (CR) including 101 patients who achieved it with only 1 induction course and had at least 1 minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment; 25 patients underwent an allogeneic stem cell transplant in first CR and were excluded, leaving 76 patients as the subject of this report. MRD monitoring by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed at the end of induction and at ∼3-month intervals thereafter. Median age was 54 years (range, 21-84 years). There was no difference in survival by achievement of at least a major molecular response (MMR; BCR-ABL/ABL < 0.1%) at CR (P = .22). Patients achieving MMR at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months had a better survival (P = .02, .04, .05, and .01, respectively). Negative MFC at CR did not predict for improved survival (P = .2). At 3 and 12 months, negative MRD by MFC was associated with improved survival (P = .04 and .001). MRD monitoring by PCR and MFC identifies patients who benefit from treatment intensification in first CR.

Significance of Rising Levels of Minimal Residual Disease in Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (Ph+ CML) in Complete Cytogenetic Response (CGCR)

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 445-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M Kantarjian ◽  
Jianqin Shan ◽  
Dan Jones ◽  
Susan O’Brien ◽  
Mary Beth Rios ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
Imatinib Therapy ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Cell Transplant

Abstract Background . Patients with Ph+ CML receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are frequently monitored for response by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) studies for minimal molecular disease. The clinical significance of rising levels of QPCR in CGCR is uncertain. Study Aims . To evaluate the relevance of increases of QPCR levels in patients with CML in CGCR on therapy. Study Group and Methods . Of 258 patients on imatinib therapy for newly diagnosed CML, 116 patients in durable CGCR on imatinib therapy for at least 18 months had significant QPCR increases (documented at least twice) as defined by literature reports. These were analyzed by the achievement of major molecular response (MMR; QPCR < 0.05%), and by the degree of QPCR increase. Results. The outcome of patients by disease status (still in MMR vs. loss of MMR vs. never in MMR) and by the QPCR level increase are shown in the Table. Only 13 of 116 patients (11%) with significant QPCR increases had CML progression; 11 of them were among 44 patients (25%) who either lost a MMR or never had a MMR, and had > 1 log increase of QPCR. The 5-year survival of all 116 patients was 92%, suggesting the minimal relevance of QPCR increases in patients in CGCR. Conclusion . Most patients with significant QPCR increases remain in CGCR. Patients who lose a MMR or never achieve a MMR, and have > 1 log increase of QPCR, should be monitored more closely, and may be evaluated for mutations of BCR-ABL kinase domain and considered for investigational therapeutic interventions. Allogeneic stem cell transplant should not be considered in view of the excellent survival. Outcome of Patients in CGCR by QPCR Increases Disease Status QPCR Log increase No. Patients CML Progression Median follow-up from QPCR increase in months (range) Persistent MMR Any 28 0 36 (3–62) Loss of MMR >0.5–1 12 0 34 (14–59) >1–2 25 3 31 (6–52) >2 11 4 45 (20–57) Not in MMR <1 32 2 35 (10–70) >1 8 4 25 (12–56)

Dynamics of Minimal Residual Leukemia After Combinations of the HyperCVAD Regimen with Imatinib or Dasatinib In Patients with Philadelphia-Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2127-2127
Author(s):  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Deborah A Thomas ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Jeffrey Jorgensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽  
Rapid Decline ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 2127 Background: The addition of tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib and dasatinib to combination chemotherapy regimens has improved the outcome of patients (pts) with Philadelphia-chromosme-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We examined whether the dynamics of minimal residual disease (MRD) measured by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) or reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) was different among pts treated with the combination of hyperCVAD with imatinib or dasatinib. Materials and Methods: From April 2001 to September 2006, 54 pts with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL were treated with the combination of hyperCVAD and imatinib; from October 2006 to July 2009, 42 pts were treated with the hyperCVAD and dasatinib regimen. The median ages for the two groups were 50 and 51 years [ranges, (27 - 84) and (21 - 78)]. Fifty one (94%) and 40 (95%) achieved complete remission (CR) on the two regimen and were followed by serial bone marrow assessments for MRD. MFC was performed using 4 or 6 color combinations of antibodies to lymphoblast and myeloid antigens (e.g., CD10, CD13, CD15, CD19, CD20, CD22, CD25, CD33, CD34, CD38, CD58, CD66c, and CD81), with a sensitivity of 0.01%. RQ-PCR for BCR-ABL was performed using TaqMan primer/probes for the e1a2, e13a2 (b2a2), and e14a2 (b3a2) BCR-ABL transcripts in a single tube with normalization to total ABL transcripts. Results: The dynamics of the MRD by RQ-PCR and MFC over the initial 18 month period after achieving CR are shown in the attached figures 1 and 2, respectively. The decline in the median value of BCR-ABL/ABL was more rapid with dasatinib, with more patients reaching the level of <0.01 at 3 and 6 months (p <0.05 and p=0.05, respectively). Similarly, a higher proportion of patients receiving dasatinib were negative by MFC at 3 and 6 months after therapy; 82% and 92% were negative at 3 months, and 94% and 100% negative at 6 months for imatinib and dasatinib, respectively. Conclusions: Dasatinib containing regimen produces a deeper and more rapid decline in the BCR-ABL and MRD by MFC in the first 6 months of treatment. Whether this would translate to an improved long-term disease-free and overall survival remains to be investigated. Disclosures: Ravandi: Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: frontline use of dasatinib in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Thomas: Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Meyer-Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer:; Amgen: Research Funding. Cortes: Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Kantarjian: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Treatment Selection for Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the Era of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Chemotherapy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingying Ma ◽  
Quanchao Zhang ◽  
Peiyan Kong ◽  
Jingkang Xiong ◽  
Xi Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive

With the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has entered a new era. The efficacy of TKIs compared with other ALL treatment options is emphasized by a rapid increase in the number of TKI clinical trials. Subsequently, the use of traditional approaches, such as combined chemotherapy and even allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), for the treatment of ALL is being challenged in the clinic. In light of the increased use of TKIs in the clinic, several questions have been raised. First, is it necessary to use intensive chemotherapy during the induction course of therapy to achieve a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status? Must a patient reach a complete molecular response/major molecular response before receiving allo-HSCT? Does MRD status affect long-term survival after allo-HSCT? Is auto-HSCT an appropriate alternative for allo-HSCT in those Ph+ ALL patients who lack suitable donors? Here, we review the recent literature in an attempt to summarize the current status of TKI usage in the clinic, including several new therapeutic approaches, provide answers for the above questions, and speculate on the future direction of TKI utilization for the treatment of Ph+ ALL patients.

Dasatinib (SPRYCEL®) in Patients (pts) with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Who Are Imatinib-Resistant (im-r) or -Intolerant (im-i): Updated Results from the CA180-015 ‘START-L’ Study.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 286-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herve Dombret ◽  
O.G. Ottmann ◽  
G. Rosti ◽  
B. Simonsson ◽  
R.A. Larson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematologic Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive

Abstract Dasatinib (SPRYCEL®, formerly BMS-354825) is a novel, oral, multi-targeted kinase inhibitor of BCR-ABL and SRC. Relapsing pts with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph(+) ALL) who have been previously treated with chemotherapy including im have a very poor prognosis. START-L is an open label, multi-center, global phase-II study, which treated 46 im-r or im-i pts with Ph(+) ALL from January through June 2005. Dasatinib was given orally, 70 mg twice daily (BID) with escalation to 100 mg BID for poor response or reductions to 50 mg and 40 mg BID for toxicity. Response was assessed on weekly blood counts and monthly bone marrow exams, including cytogenetics. Mutation analysis was conducted at baseline and at end of study. Quantitative PCR was carried out pretreatment and at the time of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). At the time of this update, all 46 pts had a minimum of 9 months (mo) of follow-up. Of these, 44 (96%) were im-r; due to the small number of im-i pts, data for all pts are presented. 59% of patients were male and median age was 48 years. The median time from initial Ph(+) ALL diagnosis to first dose was 18 mo. All patients had been pretreated with im including 46% with 600 mg per day or more, and 52% whose duration of im treatment was more than 12 mo. 37% of the pts had received a stem cell transplant. At baseline, 67% of pts had WBC <2000/mm3, 74% had platelets <100 × 103/mm3, and 24% had extramedullary disease outside of the spleen. In the 40 pts with baseline mutation data, im-resistant BCR-ABL mutations were observed in 78%, one with T315I. The median duration of therapy was 3.0 mo (range 0.03–16.5) for all pts and was 13.0 mo (9.2–16.5) for pts still on study. The overall complete hematologic response rate was 35%. The major cytogenetic response was 57%, including 54% CCyR. The major hematologic response (MHR) in the 31 pts with baseline mutations was 45%. The median duration of MHR was 11 mo and the median progression-free survival was 3.7 mo (95% CI 1.6–6.1). Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 13% and 67%, respectively and grades 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 27% and 52% of pts, respectively. Most frequent non-hematologic toxicities included diarrhea in 30% (grade 3–4, 7%), nausea in 22% (no grade 3–4), pyrexia in 22% (grade 3–4, 2%), and pleural effusion in 22% (grade 3–4, 7%) of pts. Dose was reduced in 30% and interrupted in 43% of pts, primarily due to non-hematologic toxicities. Dasatinib has important efficacy in this Ph(+) ALL pt population. Updated efficacy (including molecular response), safety, and mutational analysis data will be presented at the meeting.

scholarly journals Clinical outcomes in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia treated with ponatinib in routine clinical practice—data from a Belgian registry

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Devos ◽  
Violaine Havelange ◽  
Koen Theunissen ◽  
Stef Meers ◽  
Fleur Samantha Benghiat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Vascular Occlusion ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive

AbstractData on clinical use of ponatinib are limited. This prospective registry aimed to evaluate outcomes of ponatinib treatment in routine practice over 3 years (2016–2019) in Belgium (NCT03678454). Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were treated with ponatinib per current label. Fifty patients (33 CML and 17 Ph+ ALL) were enrolled. Fifty-five percent of CML and 29% of Ph+ ALL patients had received ≥3 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Reasons for starting ponatinib were intolerance (40%), relapse or refractoriness (28%) to previous TKIs, progression (16%), or T315I mutation (16%). Median follow-up was 15 months for CML and 4.5 months for Ph+ ALL patients. Best response was a major molecular response in 58% of CML and 41% of Ph+ ALL patients. Of 20 patients who started ponatinib due to intolerance to previous TKIs, 9 (64%) CML and 4 (67%) Ph+ ALL achieved a major molecular response. Three-year estimates of overall survival were 85.3% and 85.6%, respectively, in CML and Ph+ ALL patients; estimated progression-free survival was 81.6% and 48.9%. Adverse reactions were reported in 34 patients (68%); rash (26%) and dry skin (10%) were most common. Reported cardiovascular adverse reactions included vascular stenosis (3), arterial hypertension (2), chest pain (1), palpitations (1), and vascular occlusion (1). This Belgian registry confirms results from the PACE clinical trial and supports routine ponatinib use in CML and Ph+ ALL patients who are resistant or intolerant to previous TKIs or with the T315I mutation.

scholarly journals How I treat Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhad Ravandi
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Cell Biology ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Leukemic Cell ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplant ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive

Abstract The introduction of agents targeted at specific molecular events is changing the treatment paradigms in a number of malignancies. Historically, we have relied entirely on DNA-interactive, cytotoxic drugs for treating patients with leukemia. Increased understanding of the leukemic cell biology and pathogenesis, and the ways they evade the immune surveillance mechanisms, will likely lead to the development of more effective agents, and regimens less reliant on chemotherapy, able to achieve deep levels of disease eradication. In Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the introduction of increasingly potent tyrosine kinas inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized therapy. These drugs have been established as the cornerstone of any therapeutic strategy in this disease, and a number of trials have better defined the best ways to incorporate them into the established paradigms. Despite using TKIs, we have continued to remain reliant on cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant to achieve the best long-term outcomes. However, with the introduction of more potent TKIs and other novel agents, as well as better methods for monitoring minimal/measurable residual disease, we are entering an era where we hope to diminish our reliance on transplantation and cytotoxic chemotherapy in this disease.

scholarly journals Current management of Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL and the role of stem cell transplantation

Hematology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhad Ravandi
Keyword(s):  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive

Abstract Treatment of Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia exemplifies how the addition of potent targeted agents, directed at the molecular aberrations responsible for leukemic transformation, can overcome resistance mechanisms to traditional regimens and lead to improved outcomes. The introduction of BCR-ABL1 targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has significantly improved the outcomes not only by allowing more patients to undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) but also by decreasing our reliance on this potentially toxic strategy, particularly in the less fit population. Long-term data using chemotherapy and TKI combinations demonstrate that a proportion of patients treated can achieve durable relapse-free survival without undergoing alloHCT. Furthermore, the availability of sensitive minimal residual disease monitoring assays may allow early detection of the patients who are more likely to relapse and who are likely candidates for early alloHCT. The emergence of more potent TKIs with significant activity against resistant mutations has allowed deintensification of chemotherapy regimens. Available data indicate that complete reliance on TKIs, alone or with minimal additional therapy, and elimination of more intensive chemotherapy or alloHCT is unlikely to achieve long term cure in most patients. However, introduction of other highly effective agents that can be combined with TKIs may allow further minimization of chemotherapy and alloHCT in the future, as we have witnessed in acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document