scholarly journals Early Molecular Response with Generic Imatinib Therapy in Sokal/Hasford Intermediate- & High-Risk Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Single Institution Experience from India

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4276-4276
Author(s):  
Uttam Kumar Nath ◽  
Rituparna Chetia ◽  
Avriti Baveja
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Imatinib Therapy ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
First Line ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
2Nd Generation ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Introduction: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is the commonest adult leukemia in India. Prognostication of newly diagnosed patients of chronic phase CML (CML-CP) is done by calculating pre-treatment risk scores as per Sokal and Hasford scoring systems, and patients are categorized into low-, intermediate- & high-risk groups. According to the latest NCCN guidelines, CML-CP patients with intermediate- or high-risk Sokal or Hasford score may preferentially benefit from second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. The two second generation TKI drugs available in India are dasatinib & nilotinib. Unfortunately, majority of CML-CP patients in India cannot afford upfront second generation TKI therapy, and generic imatinib is the mainstay of treatment even for intermediate-risk & high-risk patients. Achievement of early molecular response (EMR), defined as BCR-ABL1 (international scale, IS) ≤ 10% after 3 months of first-line TKI therapy, has emerged as one of the most important predictors of favourable long-term outcomes in CML-CP. The present study describes the rate of EMR achievement with first-line generic imatinib therapy in Sokal & Hasford intermediate- & high-risk patients. Objectives: To study the early molecular response rates with generic imatinib therapy at 400 mg/day dose in CML-CP patients with intermediate-risk & high-risk Sokal or Hasford scores. Methods: Our study enrolled 73 newly diagnosed CML-CP patients with intermediate- or high-risk Sokal/Hasford scores between March 2016 and March 2018. All the patients hailed from poor socio-economic background with severe financial constraint, and none of them had any medical insurance. All the patients were treated with generic imatinib mesylate 400 mg/day which was available free of cost at the hospital. None of the patients could afford dasatinib or nilotinib, despite adequate counseling & information regarding the efficacy of 2nd generation TKIs. Treatment response was monitored and defined as per European LeukemiaNet 2013 recommendations. Hematological response was assessed at 3 months for achievement of complete hematologic response (CHR). Molecular response was assessed at 3 months of first-line treatment by quantitative real-time PCR for BCR-ABL1 (IS). Complete data of 65 patients who were compliant to imatinib treatment for at least 3 months were available for analysis. Eight patients were lost to follow up. Results: The median age of patients was 35 years (age range 17 - 72 years; 40 male). CHR was achieved in 92% patients (60 out of 65 patients). Early molecular response at 3 months (BCR-ABL1, IS) ≤ 10%) was documented in 68% (44 out of 65) patients. The range of BCR-ABL1 transcript level at 3 months was 0.01% - 10% in patients who achieved EMR. EMR was not achieved in about 60% of Sokal high-risk patients and 30% of Hasford high-risk patients. Conclusion: The real scenario of CML treatment in developing countries with resource-constrained settings is very much different from that in the developed countries. The response rates to generic Imatinib therapy in Sokal/Hasford intermediate-risk & high-risk CML-CP patients are not impressive. There is scope for significant improvement in treatment response with upfront 2nd generation TKI therapy in intermediate- & high-risk CML-CP patients, if the drugs can be made available at affordable costs in developing countries. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Finding of Kinase Domain Mutations at Diagnosis IN PATIENTS with Chronic PHASE Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML) MAY Identify Those at High RISK of Disease Progression.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4251-4251
Author(s):  
Angelo Michele Carella ◽  
Gabriella Cirmena ◽  
Gioacchino Catania ◽  
Gianmatteo Pica ◽  
Germana Beltrami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Kinase Domain Mutations

Abstract Abstract 4251 Kinase domain (KD) mutations are associated with resistance to Imatinib in CP-CML but their incidence and prognostic significance before any treatment are unclear. To assess if KD mutations at diagnosis may have prognostic significance, we have recently reviewed (before treatment with Imatinib) the mutation status of 45 patients,of whom low risk: 24 patients; intermediate risk: 8 patients; high risk: 13 patients, according to Sokal/Euro. We found that a) no patient with low and intermediate risk showed KD mutations at diagnosis; b) 4/13 high risk patients showed the following mutations at diagnosis: S265R, E255K, F359Y and E255V/E258V; other 5 patients developed mutations during Imatinib treatment (E255V, T315I, E255V/E258V, H396R and D248-274). All patients with low-intermediate risk are alive and well at a median of 44 months (range, 15-71 months). On the contrary, 3/4 high risk patients with KD mutations at diagnosis progressed and died of blastic evolution at 23, 33 and 69 months despite Nilotinib and Dasatinib therapy. Other 3/5 high risk patients who developed mutations under Imatinib, died of blastic evolution at 22, 23 and 43 months despite Nilotinib and Dasatinib treatment. Seven high risk patients are alive under Imatinib between 4 and 51 months. In conclusion, the KD mutations at diagnosis were frequent in high Sokal/Euro risk group supporting the concept that such mutations could be related to the basic biology of the disease. These data, if confirmed, could modify our approach to high risk patients with KD mutation at diagnosis, i.e. utilizing second/third TKI generation earlier during the disease and, in selected cases, reconsidering allografting earlier before leukemic evolution make such procedure useless. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

The Rate of Individual BCR-ABL Decline As an Optimized Predictor of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Treatment Outcome in Chronic Phase CML Patients, Comparison with CML Prognostic Scores and Early Molecular Response Achievement

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5150-5150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail Fominykh ◽  
Vasily Shuvaev ◽  
Irina Martynkevich ◽  
Grigory Tsaur ◽  
Natalya Bederak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Prognostic Scores ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Optimal Response ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background. About 70% of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients achieve early molecular response (BCR-ABLIS2 10% at 3-months) that lead to 5-years overall survival close to 95%. However, CML patients remain heterogeneous group and several studies in recent years were aimed to personalize treatment based on individual patients' characteristics. Our group previously put forward a hypothesis about the prognostic value of individual BCR-ABL declinerate in the first three months of CML therapy1,2. The ratio BCR-ABL at 3 months to baseline had chosen as 0.1 as best cut-off value to predict MMR at 12 months. The aims of this study were to validate our prognostic method in larger group of patients and compare these results according to CML prognostic scores. Patients and methods. Fifty-five patients (median age, 52 years; range 19-84; 24 male and 31 female) with chronic phase CML were included in the study. Patients' distribution for Sokal risk groups were as follows: low-30 / intermediate-15 / high-10. Six patients had EUTOS high-risk. Forty-two patients started treatment with Imatinib 400 mg/day, 12 patients started with Nilotinib 600 mg/day and 1 patient started with Dasatinib 100 mg/day. Median BCR-ABL transcript levels was 41.38% at diagnosis, range 3.39-3185.36% (IS). The ratio of BCR-ABL levels at 3 months to baseline for each patient was calculated. In addition, we calculated ratio of BCR-ABL levels at 3 months to BCR-ABL levels at 1 month for 13 patients. Comparison was made of the predictive sensitivity to achieve early molecular response at 3 months (10% by IS) and according to prognostic CML scores (Sokal and EUTOS). We also assessed positive likelihood ratio (LR) value for the probability of achieving MMR between patients' stratification methods. Statistical analysis was conducted with Fisher exact test and sensitivity-specificity analyses. Results. Twenty-six out of 34 patients (76.5%) with ratio of BCR-ABL levels at 3 months to baseline below than 0.1 achieved MMR at 12 months, while only 9 of 21 patients (42.9%) with ratio more than 0.1 had optimal response (LR = 1.86 (1.05 - 3.29); p=0.003). Ratio of BCR-ABL levels at 3 months to 1 month showed much better results with the same (0.1) cut-off value - 5 out of 6 patients (83.3%) with ratio BCR-ABL at 3 months to 1 month below than 0.1, while only 1 patient (14.3%) with ratio more than 0.1 achieved optimal response (LR = 5.83 (0.92 - 37.08); p=0.05), respectively. Application of early molecular response at 3 months (10% by IS) yielded worse discrimination results: 34 of 47 (72.3%) patients with BCR-ABL level ²10% at 3 months, whereas 2 of 8 (25%) patients with BCR-ABL >10% had MMR at 1 year (LR = 1.38 (1.01 - 1.89); p=0.78), respectively. CML prognostic scores results had the following sensitivity-specificity results: for Sokal - low-risk 23 of 30 (76.7%), intermediate-risk 9 of 15 (60%) and 3 of 10 (30%) high-risk patients achieved MMR at 1 year (LR (low+intermediate)/high = 1.41 (1.00 - 1.97); p=0.03); for EUTOS-score - low-risk 34 of 49 (69.4%) and only 1 of 6 (16.7%) high-risk patients had achieved MMR at 12 months (LR = 1.30 (1.00 - 1.68); p=0.02). Furthermore, application of our ratio cut-off value among patients with BCR-ABL level ²10% at 3 months allowed us to revealed additional 6 high-risk patients have not reached MMR at 1 year of therapy (Table 1). Conclusion. Our study showed that individual rates of BCR-ABL decline from baseline to 3 months and to 1 month had better LR than CML prognostic scores (Sokal, EUTOS) or early molecular response achievement (BCR-ABL levels ²10% at 3 months) and might be useful as an optimized predictors of outcome for CML patients (MMR at 1 year of treatment). 1 Fominykh M., ShuvaevV., Martynkevich I. et al. ELN Frontiers Meeting ÇWhere science meets clinical practiceÈ 16-19 October, 2014, Berlin, Germany. Abstract book: 11. 2 Shuvaev V., Fominykh M., Martynkevich I. et al. Blood (56th ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts), 2014; 124 (21): 5529. Figure 1. The patient numbers of achieving MMR at 12 months of therapy in various stratification groups with sensitivity-specificity characteristics Figure 1. The patient numbers of achieving MMR at 12 months of therapy in various stratification groups with sensitivity-specificity characteristics Disclosures Chelysheva: Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Turkina:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis Pharma: Consultancy.

Pre-Imatinib Factors Can Be Used To Define the Risk of BCR-ABL Mutations for Patients with CML in Chronic Phase and Identify a Minority Who Should Have Regular Mutation Screening.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1079-1079
Author(s):  
Susan Branford ◽  
Zbigniew Rudzki ◽  
Kevin Lynch ◽  
Timothy Hughes
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Mutation Screening ◽  
Selection Criterion ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Significant Rise ◽  
Imatinib Therapy ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Imatinib Resistance ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Secondary imatinib resistance occurs in a minority of patients with chronic phase (CP) CML and is mainly due to BCR-ABL mutations. We previously suggested a practical molecular approach for the selection of patients to assess for mutations based on a significant rise in the BCR-ABL level. This selection criterion limited the number of patients requiring screening. However, retrospective analysis showed that the mutations were detectable for a number of months prior to the rise in half of the patients. Therefore, further refinement of the criteria for screening may allow earlier detection and permit timely therapeutic intervention. We determined the independent variables associated with mutations in 222 CP patients. The median duration of imatinib therapy was 24 months (range 3 to 55). Mutations were detected in 32 patients by direct sequencing at a median of 9 months (range 3 to 35). The estimated probability of a mutation by 24 months was 26% for patients treated with second-line imatinib (n=91) and 7.3% for newly diagnosed patients (n=131), P=0.0005. Landmark analysis at 9 months demonstrated a significantly poorer progression free and overall survival for patients with mutations compared to those without (21% vs 92%, 55% vs 98% respectively, P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis of pre-imatinib factors identified detectable peripheral blood (PB) blasts and an interval of more than 2 years from diagnosis as being adverse factors for the detection of mutations. This analysis was used to generate low, intermediate and high risk groups with estimated mutation rates of 5.6%, 22%, and 70% at 24 months, P<0.0001. Patients at low risk had none of the adverse factors. Intermediate risk patients had detectable PB blasts of 2% or less, or were greater than 2 years since diagnosis. High risk patients had detectable PB blasts and were greater than 2 years since diagnosis. This group also included the sole adverse factor of greater than 2% PB blasts. In our patient cohort, 9% were classified as high risk. After commencement of imatinib therapy, failure to achieve a major cytogenetic response (MCR) by 6 months was also independently predictive for a mutation. Of the patients with low and intermediate risk, those who failed to achieve a MCR by 6 months had a significantly higher probability of a mutation, 48% vs 6.6% at 24 months, P<0.0001. 14% of patients failed to achieve a MCR by 6 months and were classified as low or intermediate risk. Based on these data we propose the following strategy: patients classified as high risk be screened for mutations 3 monthly from the start of imatinib therapy, patients with low or intermediate risk who fail to achieve a MCR by 6 months receive 3 monthly analysis from that time-point, and all other patients be screened for mutations upon a significant rise in BCR-ABL. Based on a policy of screening all patients 3 monthly, 1,605 analyses would be needed to identify the patients in our cohort with mutations at the earliest timepoint. Using the risk-based strategy, 23% of patients would qualify for 3 monthly screening and only 282 analyses undertaken. The requirement for regular screening would be reduced by 82%. In conclusion this risk-based selection criteria reduces mutation screening substantially while still enabling 61% of patients with mutations to be identified by regular mutation surveillance, and the remainder identified by evidence of emerging relapse manifested by a significant rise in the BCR-ABL level.

Randomized Comparison of Imatinib 800 Mg Vs. Imatinib 400 Mg +/- IFN in Newly Diagnosed BCR/ABL Positive Chronic Phase CML: Analysis of Molecular Remission at 12 Months; The German CML-Study IV.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 339-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudiger Hehlmann ◽  
Susanne Jung-Munkwitz ◽  
Michael Lauseker ◽  
Armin Leitner ◽  
Nadine Pletsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Molecular Remission ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Abstract 339 Initial reports that high dose imatinib results in better responses more rapidly than standard dose imatinib remain controversial. The German CML Study Group therefore compared imatinib 800 mg (IM 800) with standard dose imatinib +/- IFN (IM 400, IM 400 + IFN) in newly diagnosed, not pretreated CML with regard to molecular response at 12 months and survival in a randomized clinical trial. By April 30, 2009, 1026 chronic phase CML patients have been randomized (326 for IM 400, 338 for IM 800, 351 for imatinib + IFN). Comparison was for molecular and cytogenetic remissions, overall (OS) and progression free (PFS) survival and toxicity. 1015 patients were evaluable at baseline, 904 for survival analysis (294 for IM 400, 286 for IM 800, 324 for IM 400+IFN), 790 for cytogenetic (analysis of at least 20 metaphases required) and 823 for molecular response. The three treatment groups were similar regarding median age, sex, median values of Hb, WBC, platelets and distribution according to the EURO score. Median follow-up was 25 months in the imatinib 800 mg arm and 42 months in the imatinib 400 mg +/-IFN arms. The difference is due to the fact that at first the IM 800 arm was designed for high risk patients only and opened up to all risk groups in July 2005. The median daily doses of imatinib were 626 mg (209- 800 mg) in the IM 800 arm and 400 mg (184- 720 mg) in the IM 400 +/- IFN arms. Of 218 patients receiving imatinib 800 mg and evaluable for dosage at 12 months, 100 (45.9%) received more than 700 mg/day, 27 (12.4%) 601-700 mg, 37 (17.0%) 501-600 mg, 48 (22.0%) 401-500 mg and only 6 (2.8%) 400 mg/day or less. The cumulative incidences at 12 months of complete cytogenetic remission (CCR) were 52.3%, 64.9% and 50.6%, and of major molecular remission (MMR) 30.2%, 54.3% and 34.6% with IM 400, IM 800 and IM 400 +IFN, respectively. The cumulative incidences of achieving CCR and MMR with IM 400, IM 800 and IM 400+IFN at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after start of treatment are summarized in the table. MMR at 12 months was reached faster with IM 800 than with IM 400 (p=0.0003) or IM400+IFN (p=0.0131). Optimal molecular response (OMR=<0.01% BCR-ABL according to the international scale) was reached with IM 800 after a median of 31.3 months vs. 47.5 and 42.5 months with IM 400 +/- IFN. Also CCR was reached faster with IM 800 (p<0.01). The more rapid achievement of MMR with IM 800 was observed in low and intermediate risk patients with little or no difference in high risk patients. In an analysis “as treated” patients receiving more than 600 mg/day reached remissions faster than those receiving lower dosages (CCR after a median of 7.8 vs. 8.9 months, MMR after a median of 10.4 vs. 12.9 months). At the time of this evaluation, OS (92% at 5 years) and PFS (88% at 5 years) showed no difference. Type and severity of adverse events (AE) at 12 months did not differ from those expected (all grades and grades III/IV). Hematologic (thrombocytopenia 7% vs. 4%) and non-hematologic AEs (gastrointestinal 35% vs. 15-24% and edema 29% vs. 16-19%) were more frequent with IM 800, fatigue (14% vs. 7-13%) and neurological problems (15% vs. 6-7%) more frequent with IM 400 + IFN (all grades). These data show a significantly faster achievement of MMR at 12 months with IM 800 as compared to IM 400 +/-IFN. So far, this faster response rate did not translate into better OS or PFS. Hence IM 400 should still be considered as standard of care. With some individual dose adjustments tolerability of IM 800 was good. Longer observation is required to determine whether this more rapid achievement of MMR and CCR will have a long term impact or not. Disclosures: German CML Study Group: Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; European LeukemiaNet: Research Funding; Kompetenznetz Leukämie: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Essex: Research Funding.

Prediction of Molecular Response of Chronic Phase CML Patients by the EUTOS Score: Results of the Randomized CML-Study IV,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3762-3762
Author(s):  
Susanne Saussele ◽  
Michael Lauseker ◽  
Verena Hoffmann ◽  
Ulrike Proetel ◽  
Benjamin Hanfstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Eutos Score

Abstract Abstract 3762 Introduction: The EUTOS Score was developed and validated as a prognostic tool for the achievement of complete cytogenetic response (CCR) at 18 months for chronic phase (CP) CML patients under imatinib therapy. The score identifies high-risk patients not reaching CCR at 18 months with a positive predictive value of 34% and a specificity of 92% using only two variables, peripheral blood basophils and spleen size at diagnosis (Hasford et al. Blood 2011). We sought to evaluate the clinical impact of the EUTOS score to predict molecular response. Therefore, we analyzed the EUTOS score with patients from the German CML-Study IV, a randomized 5-arm trial (imatinib 400 mg vs. imatinib 800 mg vs. imatinib in combination with interferon alpha vs. imatinib in combination with araC vs. imatinib after interferon failure). Results: From July 2002 to December 2010, 1,502 patients with BCR-ABL positive CML in CP were randomized. 129 patients with imatinib after interferon alpha and 36 other patients had to be excluded (14 due to incorrect randomization or withdrawal of consent, 22 with missing baseline information). 1,337 patients were evaluable for overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS), 1,252 for molecular responses. 749 of these patients were part of the score development sample. Therefore cytogenetic analyses are not described here. By EURO score, 36% of patients (n=475) were low risk, 51% (n=681) intermediate risk, and 12% (n=167) high risk. The EUTOS score was low risk in 88% (n=1163) and high risk in 12% (n=160). The high-risk patients differed between the two scores: EUTOS high-risk patients were classified according to EURO score in 12% as low (n=19), in 45% as intermediate (n=68) and in 43% as high risk (n=73). Patients with high, intermediate, and low risk EURO score achieved MMR in 22, 16, and 13 months and CMR4 (BCR-ABL <=0.01%) in 59, 41, and 34 months. P-values for low vs. intermediate risk groups were borderline only (0.03 for MMR and 0.04 for CMR4), whereas p-values for high vs. low/intermediate risk groups were for both molecular response levels <0.001. At 12 months the proportion of patients in MMR was 38%, 46%, 54% for high, intermediate, and low risk patients, respectively. Similar results were observed with the Sokal score. Patients with high risk EUTOS score achieved deep molecular responses (MMR and CMR4) significantly later than patients with low risk EUTOS score (MMR: median 21.0 vs. 14.8 months, p<0.001, Fig. 1a; CMR4: median 60.6 vs. 37.2 months, p<0.001, Fig. 1b). The proportions of patients achieving MMR at 12 months were significantly lower in the EUTOS high-risk group than in the EUTOS low-risk group (30.8% vs. 50.6%, p<0.001). OS after 5 years was 85% for high and 91% for low risk patients (p=n.s.), PFS was 85% and 90%, respectively. Conclusions: The EUTOS score clearly separates CML patients also according to MMR and CMR4 (MR4). The new EUTOS score should be used in future trials with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in CML. Disclosures: Neubauer: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Kneba:Hoffmann La Roche: Honoraria. Schnittger:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hochhaus:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. German CML Study Group:Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMBF: Research Funding; EU: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Essex: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Effects of Delayed Radical Prostatectomy and Active Surveillance on Localised Prostate Cancer—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 3274
Author(s):  
Vinson Wai-Shun Chan ◽  
Wei Shen Tan ◽  
Aqua Asif ◽  
Alexander Ng ◽  
Olayinka Gbolahan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Active Monitoring ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Oncological Outcomes ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Randomised Controlled

External factors, such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), can lead to cancellations and backlogs of cancer surgeries. The effects of these delays are unclear. This study summarised the evidence surrounding expectant management, delay radical prostatectomy (RP), and neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) compared to immediate RP. MEDLINE and EMBASE was searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised controlled studies pertaining to the review question. Risks of biases (RoB) were evaluated using the RoB 2.0 tool and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. A total of 57 studies were included. Meta-analysis of four RCTs found overall survival and cancer-specific survival were significantly worsened amongst intermediate-risk patients undergoing active monitoring, observation, or watchful waiting but not in low- and high-risk patients. Evidence from 33 observational studies comparing delayed RP and immediate RP is contradictory. However, conservative estimates of delays over 5 months, 4 months, and 30 days for low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients, respectively, have been associated with significantly worse pathological and oncological outcomes in individual studies. In 11 RCTs, a 3-month course of NHT has been shown to improve pathological outcomes in most patients, but its effect on oncological outcomes is apparently limited.

scholarly journals Prevention of Hypotension following Spinal Anaesthesia in Caesarean Section - then and now

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-419
Author(s):  
J K Mitra
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
First Line ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Poor Efficacy

Hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section remains a common scenario in our clinical practice. Certain risk factors play a role in altering the incidence of hypotension. Aortocaval compression counteraction does not help to prevent hypotension. Intravenous crystalloid prehydration has poor efficacy; thus, the focus has changed toward co-hydration and use of colloids. Phenylephrine is established as a first- line vasopressor, although there are limited data from high-risk patients. Ephedrine crosses the placenta more than phenylephrine and cause possible alterations in the foetal physiology.http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v8i4.6242 Kathmandu Univ Med J 2010;8(4):415-19   

scholarly journals Remission in Patients with Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Treated with Arsenic Trioxide (varitrinox) As the First Line in Colombia

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3-3
Author(s):  
Gustavo Milone ◽  
Samuel Sarmiento Doncel ◽  
Carol Agudelo Rico ◽  
Fabiola Vizcarra Reyes ◽  
Gina Alejandra Diaz Mosquera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Arsenic Trioxide ◽  
Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Promyelocytic Leukemia ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
Risk Patients

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a subtype of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in which a chromosomal translocation t (15; 17) (q22; q12) is generated by fusing produces a hybrid PML / RARα gene, generating an altered signal . The combination of transretinoic acid (ATRA) plus arsenic trioxide (ATO) has been shown to be superior to ATRA plus chemotherapy in the treatment of newly diagnosed standard risk patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) in several countries. The objective of the present study is to describe the frequency of remission in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia who were administered as a first line Arsenic Trioxide (varitrinox) during the period from November 2017 to June 2020 in Colombian patients. Methods: Retrospective observational and descriptive study of 12 patients diagnosed with acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with ATO Arsenic trioxide (Varitrinox) as first line, the source of information was provided by the treating hematologists (medical records) by filling out the technical concept format. Active pharmacovigilance scientist in Colombia, this format keeps the identification information of the patient anonymized and the confidentiality of the data is guaranteed as well as compliance with the rules of good clinical practice. Results: Twelve patients with age range between 22 and 69 years with a median age of 34.0 were analyzed. It was found in the analysis that 100% had induction hematologic remission with a median of 45 days. 75% of patients received ATO + ATRA and were at low and intermediate risk, the remaining 25% received ATRA + ATO + Chemotherapy and were at high risk, and intermediate risk. 91.7% of molecular remission in consolidation was obtained and it was measured in cycle 3 by means of PCR (undetectable), 8.3% (n = 1) was positive 3% and is finishing consolidation. Regarding the most frequent adverse events, intravascular coagulation (n = 9), neutropenia (n = 6) and thrombocytopenia (n = 6) were observed. 75% of patients are disease-free, 16.7% are on maintenance (they received ATO + ATRA + Induction chemotherapy) and 8.3% are on consolidation. So far, none of the patients under study have died. Conclusions: Our results support the use of ATO (Varitrinox) in newly diagnosed APL patients (as first line), as a care strategy for low, intermediate and high risk patients. The role of ATRA-ATO is guaranteed in other studies where they manage patients of different risks. Key words: Arsenic trioxide, leukemia promyelocytic acute, leukemia myeloid acute, remission induction, tretinoin. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals MIPSS70+ v2.0 predicts long-term survival in myelofibrosis after allogeneic HCT with the Flu/Mel conditioning regimen

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haris Ali ◽  
Ibrahim Aldoss ◽  
Dongyun Yang ◽  
Sally Mokhtari ◽  
Samer Khaled ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Markers ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Transplantation Outcomes ◽  
Very High

Abstract Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the only curative treatment for myelofibrosis (MF), data are limited on how molecular markers predict transplantation outcomes. We retrospectively evaluated transplantation outcomes of 110 consecutive MF patients who underwent allo-HCT with a fludarabine/melphalan (Flu/Mel) conditioning regimen at our center and assessed the impact of molecular markers on outcomes based on a 72-gene next-generation sequencing panel and Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System 70+ v2.0 (MIPSS70+ v2.0). With a median follow-up of 63.7 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 65% and the nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate was 17%. In mutational analysis, JAK2 V617F and ASXL1 mutations were the most common. By univariable analysis, higher Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System scores, unrelated donor type, and very-high-risk cytogenetics were significantly associated with lower OS. Only CBL mutations were significantly associated with lower OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.64; P = .032) and increased NRM (HR, 3.68; P = .004) after allo-HCT, but CALR, ASXL1, and IDH mutations did not have an impact on transplantation outcomes. Patient classification per MIPSS70 showed worse OS for high-risk (HR, 0.49; P = .039) compared with intermediate-risk patients. Classification per MIPSS70+ v2.0 demonstrated better OS when intermediate-risk patients were compared with high-risk patients (HR, 0.291) and much lower OS when very-high-risk patients were compared with high-risk patients (HR, 5.05; P ≤ .001). In summary, we present one of the largest single-center experiences of Flu/Mel-based allo-HCT, demonstrating that revised cytogenetic changes and MIPSS70+ v2.0 score predict transplantation outcomes, and thus can better inform physicians and patients in making decisions about allo-HCT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document