scholarly journals Treatment in AML and MDS Patients Who Are Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Using Social Media Intelligence to Capture What Really Matters to Patients

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4826-4826
Author(s):  
Alison Booth ◽  
Timothy J Bell ◽  
Sonia Halhol ◽  
Shiyu Pan ◽  
Verna L Welch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Social Media ◽  
Drug Administration ◽  
Food And Drug Administration ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Treatment Decisions ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Objectives: Treatment options for patients with AML/MDS who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy are limited. Due to rapid progression of the condition it is difficult to capture what is most important to patients when making treatment decisions. Social media data is a rich source of information, and the FDA recently encouraged stakeholders to explore the use of social media to capture the patient perspective.[i] This study aimed to capture factors most important to patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy through using disease-specific social media posts by patients and/or their caregivers. Identifying these factors will give clinicians a better understanding of what is important to their patients when considering their treatment. Methods: AML and MDS patient/caregiver posts were extracted from publicly available discussions on three large AML/MDS-specific sites. Posts were manually reviewed to only include the experience of patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. 1,443 posts from 220 AML patients/caregivers and 2,733 posts from 127 MDS patients/caregivers were included. A targeted search for terms relating to end of life treatment decisions was conducted within the included posts, yielding 83 posts from 40 AML users and 70 posts from 39 MDS users. These posts were manually reviewed, and relevant text segments (discussing why patients wish to live longer and reasons/motives for treatment decisions) were highlighted using a qualitative analysis approach. Results: Of the reviewed data, 40 posts from 27 AML users and 20 posts from 18 MDS users contained relevant information. A theme important to patients and caregivers was spending time with family and making memories (in 20% of relevant posts). Often reported was the desire to reach family occasions including birthdays, Christmas, anniversaries, and weddings. Quality of life was also an important consideration (in 33% of relevant posts). Many patients expressed a wish to have better quality of life over quantity of life, and did not want the risk of suffering from side effects. Tied into this was the clear preference to be at home rather than in a hospital or care home (in over 22% of relevant posts). To some patients, it was important to try all possible treatment options, and some reported their doctors were supportive of this. However a lack of available treatments was also perceived by some patients as if their doctors give up on treating them too soon. Discussion: Treatment decisions in patients with AML/MDS are complex and unique to each patient. From this analysis, it is clear being home and spending time with family was associated with a perceived higher level of quality of life for patients and caregivers. Patients and caregivers place high importance on treatment options that provide better perceived QoL over treatments that provide a moderate extension to life expectancy and require hospitalisation. This study highlights the need to consider patient perceptions of QoL and the importance of understanding patient and caregiver goals and opinions to best determine personalised treatment options. [i] United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). June 2018. Patient-Focused Drug Development: Collecting Comprehensive and Representative Input Guidance for Industry, Food and Drug Administration Staff, and Other Stakeholders. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM610442.pdf [accessed July 24, 2018]. Disclosures Booth: Evidera: Employment. Bell:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Halhol:Evidera: Employment. Pan:Evidera: Employment. Welch:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Merinopoulou:Evidera: Employment. Lambrelli:Evidera: Employment. Cox:Evidera: Employment.

scholarly journals Using Social Media to Highlight Unmet Needs in Patients with AML and MDS Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: A Patient Centered Perspective

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4831-4831
Author(s):  
Alison Booth ◽  
Timothy J Bell ◽  
Sonia Halhol ◽  
Shiyu Pan ◽  
Verna L Welch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Social Media ◽  
Effective Treatment ◽  
Drug Administration ◽  
Unmet Needs ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Lack Of Information ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Objectives: For patients with AML/MDS who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, prognosis is poor and effective treatment options are limited, often leading to unmet medical needs in this population. A deeper understanding of the patient perspective in this population is valuable to inform decision making and better address patients' needs. The FDA encourages the use of social media to shed light on patients' perspectives regarding the symptoms and impacts of their disease, stressing the opportunity to inform medical product development and enhance regulatory decision making.[i] This study aimed to use social media data to identify self-reported barriers to treatment, and capture the patient/caregiver understanding of the condition and prognosis in AML/MDS patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Methods: AML and MDS patient/caregiver posts were extracted from publicly available discussions on three large AML/MDS specific forum sites. User posts were manually reviewed to only include the experience of patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. A total of 1,443 posts from 220 AML patients/caregivers and 2,733 posts from 127 MDS patients/caregivers were included. A manual qualitative review of a sample of 80 AML patients/caregivers and 5 MDS patients/caregivers' posts was conducted. Hypothesis coding was used to develop a coding dictionary based on key themes and open coding was used to incorporate additional themes, codes, and sub-codes inductively. Relevant content was coded, grouped into categories and overall themes. Results: Of the 85 user posting histories reviewed, 73 (86%) contained relevant information about the stated key objectives: 41 (56%) of users discussed factors relating to treatment decisions and 37 (51%) discussed unmet needs. The most common reasons for why the patient received no treatment were: the patient could not cope with chemotherapy due to co-morbidities or poor heath (31%), old age (26%), lack of effective available treatment options (18%) and the risk of side effects (15%). Other reasons included wanting to travel and adverse events. The most commonly reported unmet needs were: lack of/no treatment options (23%), lack of information about prognosis and deterioration (18%), lack of information about treatment (13%), lack of understanding about the condition (8%) and a lack of support and information from doctors (8%). Other unmet needs discussed included delayed diagnosis, treatment effectiveness, and lack of family support. Discussion: The need for more effective treatments in this population is known. However, this analysis shows patients/caregivers also face additional challenges. The discussion surrounding lack of information about prognosis, deterioration and treatment suggest there is a communication barrier between patients/caregivers and clinicians. Patients/caregivers expressed that they did not receive adequate information about these topics. It is not possible to determine whether the information was not given or whether patients/care givers failed to understand information that was given. Clinicians need ensure these topics are discussed, and delivered in a manner comprehensible for patients/caregivers to help patients make more effective treatment decisions. Furthermore, a greater understanding of AML and its symptoms is required to potentially allow for earlier diagnosis. [i] United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). June 2018. Patient-Focused Drug Development: Collecting Comprehensive and Representative Input Guidance for Industry, Food and Drug Administration Staff, and Other Stakeholders. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM610442.pdf [accessed July 24, 2018]. Disclosures Booth: Evidera: Employment. Bell:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Halhol:Evidera: Employment. Pan:Evidera: Employment. Welch:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Merinopoulou:Evidera: Employment. Lambrelli:Evidera: Employment. Cox:Evidera: Employment.

scholarly journals Toward Patient-Centered Innovation

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 1522-1530
Author(s):  
Jennifer E. Flythe ◽  
Tandrea S. Hilliard ◽  
Kourtney Ikeler ◽  
San Keller ◽  
Debbie S. Gipson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Drug Administration ◽  
Food And Drug Administration ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Individuals with dialysis-dependent kidney failure experience considerable disease- and treatment-related decline in functional status and overall well-being. Despite these experiences, there have been few substantive technological advances in KRT in decades. As such, new federal initiatives seek to accelerate innovation. Historically, integration of patient perspectives into KRT product development has been limited. However, the US Food and Drug Administration recognizes the importance of incorporating patient perspectives into the total product life cycle (i.e., from product conception to postmarket surveillance) and encourages the consideration of patient-reported outcomes in regulatory-focused clinical trials when appropriate. Recognizing the significance of identifying patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that capture contemporary patient priorities, the Kidney Health Initiative, a public–private partnership between the American Society of Nephrology and US Food and Drug Administration, convened a workgroup to (1) develop a conceptual framework for a health-related quality of life PROM; (2) identify and map existing PROMs to the conceptual framework, prioritizing them on the basis of their supporting evidence for use in the regulatory environment; and (3) describe next steps for identifying PROMs for use in regulatory clinical trials of transformative KRT devices. This paper summarizes the proposed health-related quality-of-life PROM conceptual framework, maps and prioritizes PROMs, and identifies gaps and future needs to advance the development of rigorous, meaningful PROMS for use in clinical trials of transformative KRT devices.

Melphalan, Prednisone and Lenalidomide Followed by Lenalidomide Maintenance Displays Treatment Characteristics Favourable to Global Quality of Life in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Patients ≥ 65 Years,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3988-3988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meletios Athanasios Dimopoulos ◽  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Roman Hajek ◽  
Martin Kropff ◽  
Maria Teresa Petrucci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Risk Of Disease ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3988 Background: Melphalan, prednisone and lenalidomide followed by lenalidomide maintenance (MPR-R) demonstrated higher response rates (ORR; 77% vs. 50%, p <.001; VGPR or better: 32% vs. 12%, p <.001) and significantly reduced the risk of disease progression (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.423, p <.001) vs. MP alone [Palumbo, 2010]. Alongside efficacy considerations, analyses on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) may help more fully establish a regimen's overall treatment profile. HRQoL improvements with MPR-R were observed during MPR induction as well as lenalidomide maintenance, documenting a well-balanced profile in terms of efficacy, tolerability and HRQoL [Dimopoulos, 2011]. Alternative findings on novel NDMM treatment have shown efficacy of melphalan, prednisone and bortezomib (VMP) treatment to be associated with an intermittent deterioration in patients' HRQoL [Dhawan, 2009]. Methods: A mixed effects model was developed based on parameters pre-selected as potentially clinically relevant in impacting HRQoL. Models were run on six domains pre-selected based on clinical relevance: Global QoL, Physical Functioning, Fatigue and Pain (from EORTC QLQ-C30), and Disease Symptoms and Side Effects of Treatment (from EORTC MY20). Cycle 16 was determined as the last observation time point with a statistically meaningful sample size at time of follow-up (May 2010). Following explanatory variables were included: time-dependant covariates at individual HRQoL measurement time points (i.e. cycle 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16), treatment group (MPR-R vs. MP), gender (Female vs. Male), age, baseline QoL, Partial Response (PR) vs. Stable Disease (SD) and Very Good Partial Response or better (≥VGPR) vs. SD, Progressive Disease (PD) and Discontinuation (DC). Neutropenia and anemia, both Grade 3 or 4, were considered the clinically most relevant safety parameters. Main results for Global QoL are reported, with results from other domains found to be comparable. Results: Across all time-dependant covariates, a statistically significant reduction on Global QoL (−4.63; p=.004) was observed at Cycle 4. Being female vs. male significantly reduced Global QoL by -−.07 (p=.026). Each additional life year was found to lower Global QoL b− −0.40 points (p=.034). Baseline Global QoL was also significant, each additional score point leading to +0.30 (p <.001). A response level of ≥VGPR vs. SD increased Global QoL by 9.11 (p=.023); Progressive Disease (PD) reduced Global QoL by -−.34 score points (p <.001). All other pre-defined variables did not significantly impact Global QoL. Clinically meaningful changes for Global QoL in the underlying patient population have been determined to constitute at least a 7-point change [Dimopoulos, 2011]. Progressive disease (reducing Global QoL), respectively ≥VGPR (increasing Global QoL) exerted clinically meaningful changes, as did anemia grade 3–4, which had a clinically meaningful, but not statistically significant negative impact (−9.85; p=.057). Although no significant direct effect of MPR-R over MP on Global QoL was detected in the underlying model, MPR-R displays properties which favor an improved HRQoL profile, including a stronger delay in PD and higher % of VGPR vs. MP patients. Furthermore, certain properties more frequently observed with MPR-R than MP (neutropenia grade 3 or 4 and discontinuation, DC) were shown not to have a significant impact on HRQoL. Anemia grade 3 or 4, exerted a clinically meaningful negative effect but was not significantly more often observed with MPR-R compared to MP (24% vs. 17%, p= 0.091). Conclusions: More patients achieved ≥VGPR when receiving continuous MPR-R treatment than those receiving MP. In the above pooled analysis, ≥VGPR was shown to improve Global QoL in a clinically meaningful and statistically significant way. Furthermore, progression was also shown to negatively impact Global QoL (−8.34; p <.001), with MPR-R significantly reducing the risk of disease progression over MP. Delaying progression with continuous MPR-R therefore helps to maintain a high Global QoL. Disclosures: Dimopoulos: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Palumbo:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ortho-Biotech: Honoraria. Hajek:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria. Petrucci:Celgene: Honoraria. Lewis:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Millar:Celgene: Consultancy. Zhang:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mei:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Delforge:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Data from Patients (Pts) with Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) Enrolled in the MOST Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1665-1665
Author(s):  
Ellen K. Ritchie ◽  
Anas Al-Janadi ◽  
Philomena Colucci ◽  
Patricia Kalafut ◽  
Dilan Paranagama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Introduction: ET is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by thrombocytosis and an increased risk for thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. ET can be associated with substantial symptom burden, impaired quality of life (QoL), and reduced survival. PRO data pertaining to the impact of ET on QoL and symptom burden in these pts are limited. The ongoing Myelofibrosis and Essential Thrombocythemia Observational STudy (MOST) was designed to collect data about the demographics, disease burden, PROs, and management of pts with ET or myelofibrosis (MF) in clinical practices throughout the United States. This analysis describes PROs from pts with ET enrolled in MOST. Methods: MOST is a longitudinal, multicenter, noninterventional, prospective, observational study (NCT02953704). Eligible adults with ET were ≥60 years of age, had a history of thrombotic events, or were receiving ET-directed therapy. PROs were collected in conjunction with usual-care visits approximately every 6 months over a planned observation period of 36 months. Patient-reported symptom burden was assessed with the disease-specific MPN Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS), composed of 10 items (fatigue, early satiety, abdominal discomfort, inactivity, concentration problems, night sweats, itching, bone pain, fever [>100oF], weight loss). The MPN-SAF numbness/tingling item was also included in the questionnaire but was not included in the TSS calculation. Symptom severity was graded from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable), with a possible TSS ranging from 0 to 100. Health-related QoL was evaluated with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0), composed of 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, 6 additional single-symptom items, and a global health/QoL scale. For functional and global health/QoL scales, higher scores indicate higher functioning and better global health/QoL, respectively. For symptom scales/items, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden. High-risk pts and low-risk pts receiving ET-directed therapy (excluding aspirin only) with baseline PRO data were included in this analysis. Data were summarized with descriptive statistics. Results: The MOST study enrolled 1234 pts with ET between Nov 29, 2016 and March 29, 2019 at 124 sites. Of these pts, 794 qualified for this analysis (data cut-off date, June 17, 2019); median age was 70 (range, 19-93) years, 80% were ≥60 years of age, 68% were women, 90% were white, 42% were working full or part-time, and 4% had a documented family history of MF, ET, or polycythemia vera. The majority of pts (87%) had high-risk ET. At enrollment, 768 pts completed the MPN-SAF. Mean (SD) TSS was 17.1 (15.6); 33% of pts had TSS ≥20. Women had higher mean (SD) TSS than men (18.5 [15.8] vs 14.2 [14.9]) and had higher mean individual symptom scores, except for weight loss and fever. The highest mean (SD) individual symptom scores were fatigue (3.4 [2.7]), numbness/tingling (2.3 [3.0]), inactivity (2.3 [2.8]), and early satiety (2.3 [2.7]) (Fig A). The most frequently reported severe symptoms (ie, score ≥7) were fatigue (17% [127/746]), numbness/tingling (14% [107/767]), and inactivity (11% [86/762]). At enrollment, 794 pts completed the EORTC QLQ-C30. The highest mean (SD) symptom scale scores (score ≥15) were fatigue (29.6 [25.8]), insomnia (28.6 [30.6]), pain (22.1 [27.9]), dyspnea (17.2 [25.5]), and constipation (15.7 [25.2]) (Fig B). The mean (SD) global health status/QoL score was 72.7 (21.9); functional scores ranged from 79.9 (21.9) for emotional functioning to 85.2 (24.1) for social functioning (Fig C). The average functional scale scores and symptom scale scores indicate higher functioning and less symptom burden, respectively, in men vs women. Conclusion: Pts with ET experienced a high symptom burden; fatigue was the most common and highest in severity. Symptom burden and quality of life scores in the current study were similar to prior reports (Emanuel J Clin Oncol 2012; Scherber Blood 2011). Women reported higher symptom burden than men in both the MPN-SAF and EORTC QLQ-30. Of note, numbness/tingling, which is not included in the MPN-SAF TSS calculation, was one of the most frequently reported severe symptoms for pts with ET in MOST. Future analyses from this trial will continue to increase understanding of the symptom burden and its impact on QoL in pts with ET. Disclosures Ritchie: Celgene, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer: Consultancy; Genentech: Other: Advisory board; Tolero: Other: Advisory board; Pfizer: Other: Advisory board, travel support; agios: Other: Advisory board; Celgene: Other: Advisory board; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene, Novartis: Other: travel support; AStella, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, NS Pharma, Pfizer: Research Funding; Ariad, Celgene, Incyte, Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Al-Janadi:Incyte: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech/Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Genentech/Roche: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Sandoz-Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodation, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Colucci:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kalafut:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Paranagama:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mesa:Genotech: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Sierra Onc: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; La Jolla Pharma: Consultancy; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Samus: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding.

scholarly journals IPH4102; An Anti-KIR3DL2 Monoclonal Antibody in Refractory Sezary Syndrome: Results from a Multicenter Phase 1 Trial

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 684-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martine Bagot ◽  
Pierluigi Porcu ◽  
Basem M. William ◽  
Maxime Battistella ◽  
Maarten Vermeer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Aims: Sezary Syndrome (SS) is the most aggressive form of cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL), characterized with high blood involvement and expression of Killer cell immunoglobulin like receptor 3DL2 (KIR3DL2). IPH4102 is a first-in-class monoclonal antibody that targets KIR3DL2. Very limited effective treatment options are available for SS patients with refractory disease. We conducted a phase 1 study testing IPH4102 in patients with refractory CTCL. Here we report results from the SS subset. Methods: IPH4102-101 study is a multicenter phase I trial composed of a dose escalation and cohort expansion portions that evaluated IPH4102 in patients with refractory CTCL. Key eligibility criteria included failure of ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. KIR3DL2 testing was performed for all patients at baseline and at different time points throughout the study. IPH4102 was given Q1w x 4 weeks, followed by Q2w x 10 weeks then Q4w until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint is safety. Main 2ry endpoints include best global response (BGR) using the Olsen criteria, progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), quality of life (QOL) and biomarker analyses. Results: The study included 35 SS patients, 20 in the dose escalation and 15 in the cohort expansion, with a median age of 70 years (37-90). Median time from initial SS diagnosis to starting IPH4012 was 22.8 months. Nineteen patients (54%) received IPH4102 as ≥ 4th line of systemic therapy and 7 (20%) were previously treated with mogamulizumab. Thirteen patients (37%) had lymph node involvement as per investigator assessment and based on radiological examination while 7 patients (20%) had evidence of large cell transformation. KIR3DL2 expression was observed in either skin or blood in 33 patients (94%) and in both in 28 patients (80%). Most common adverse events (AEs) were asthenia (26%), peripheral edema (26%), and fatigue (23%), which were all grade 1-2. Possibly related grade ≥ 3 AEs were observed in 7 patients (20%), and only 2 patients (6%) stopped treatment for an AE. Table 1 shows BGR and response by compartment. Overall response rate was 42.9% [95% CI: 28.0% - 59.1%], with median time to response of 4.8 months. Median DOR and PFS were 5.6 months [95% CI: 3.2-not reached] and 12.8 months [95% CI: 8.1-not reached], respectively. Mogamulizumab pretreated patients showed BGR, median DOR and PFS of 42.9%, 13.8 and 20.9 months, respectively. Quality of life assessment was performed using the Pruritus VAS score andSkinDex29. Patients with CR, PR or SD showed marked improvement overtime of all evaluated parameters including SkinDex29 global, symptoms, emotional, and functional scores. Biomarker analysis showed progressive decrease in CD4/CD8 ratio in responding patients. The decrease of KIR3DL2+ expressing cells in skin evaluated by immunohistochemistry at week 5 and 14 was able to predict BGR (AUC=0.749, 0.714, respectively). Figure 1 shows reduction in KIR3DL2 expressing cells at week 5 and week 14 in a patient who had PR as BGR. To date, 9 patients are still ongoing treatment. Updated clinical and correlative research analyses will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: IPH4102 is highly effective in patients with refractory SS. It induces meaningful clinical activity and improves quality of life placing it as an encouraging treatment option for these patients. Further development in SS and other T-cell malignancies is underway. Disclosures Bagot: Actelion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Porcu:Innate Pharma: Consultancy. Khodadoust:Innate Pharma: Research Funding. Sicard:Innate Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Azim:Innate Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kim:miRagen: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Horizon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Galderma: Research Funding; Tetralogic: Research Funding; Neumedicine: Consultancy, Research Funding; Soligenix: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Research Funding; Medivir: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa-Kirin-Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Venetoclax Improves Quality of Life for Patients with Elapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4858-4858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara Cochrane ◽  
Tatiana Chagorova ◽  
Tadeusz Robak ◽  
Su-Peng Yeh ◽  
Evgeny Nikitin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Eortc Qlq ◽  
The Impact

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have significantly decreased health related quality of life (HRQoL), particularly related to severe and progressive fatigue. Side effects of chemotherapies and the emotional burden of living with an often poor prognosis disease also negatively impact patient HRQoL. Venetoclax, an oral agent that targets the anti-apoptotic protein BCL2, has demonstrated high rates of deep and durable response in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL, including those with 17p deletions, and has been shown to facilitate clinically relevant improvement in several key aspects of functioning and HRQoL. We evaluated the impact of venetoclax monotherapy on the quality of life of patients with R/R CLL. METHODS: VENICE II is an ongoing open-label, phase 3b, multicenter study (NCT02980731) that assessed patient-reported HRQoL in patients who were ≥18 years old with R/R CLL, including those with 17p deletion, TP53 mutations, and/or prior experience with B-cell receptor pathway inhibitor-containing (BCRi) therapy, treated with venetoclax monotherapy (5-week dose-titration, starting at 20mg once daily, then increased weekly to 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, and 400 mg, followed by 400mg once daily). The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline to Week 48 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) subscale. HRQoL subscales analyzed included: Global Health Status, Role Functioning, Emotional Functioning, Cognitive Functioning, Social Functioning, and Fatigue. The impact on QoL was also assessed on the CLL Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL16). Relevance of mean changes in HRQoL measures from baseline were analyzed based on minimum important difference (MID); a 5-10 point change was defined as MID, and >10 points was considered clinically meaningful.(Osoba, D., et al. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:139-44. Osoba, D., et al. Qual Life Res. 1994;3:353-64.) Safety and adverse events (AEs) were also monitored. RESULTS: As of the data cutoff, April 30, 2018, the median time on study was 28 weeks (range: 1 - 73) and the median time on therapy was 23 weeks (range: 0.1 - 69) in this ongoing study. Of the 169 treated patients, 70% were male; the median age was 65 years (range: 24 - 86). Among those with available data, 17p deletions and TP53 mutations were confirmed in 34% (41/122) and 38% (19/50) of patients, respectively. Overall, 38%, 20%, and 42% of patients had one, two, and three (or more) prior lines of therapy respectively; 21% of patients had prior BCRi therapy. Clinically meaningful improvements from baseline were observed by week 12 and were sustained through week 48 in the EORTC-QLQ-C30 global health status and the role function, social function, and fatigue subscales (Table and Figure 1A) and EORTC-QLQ-CLL16 future health and disease effect subscales (Table and Figure 1B). Eighty-two percent of patients had at least 1 AE; most commonly observed AEs (≥10% of patients) were neutropenia (35%), diarrhea (17%), thrombocytopenia (15%), anemia (12%), nausea (12%), and upper respiratory infection (11%). Twenty-eight percent of patients had a serious AE, of which the most common were pneumonia (5%), febrile neutropenia (4%) and pyrexia (3%). Five percent of patients discontinued the study due to an AE. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data from this ongoing study suggest that patients with R/R CLL experienced improvement in several key aspects of functioning and quality of life with venetoclax monotherapy within the first 12 weeks which is sustained over time. Venetoclax monotherapy was well tolerated in R/R CLL patients. These findings are consistent with previous studies of R/R CLL patients who received venetoclax monotherapy. Disclosures Cochrane: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Calgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria. Robak:AbbVie, Inc: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy. Yeh:GNT Biotech & Medicals Crop.: Research Funding. Nikitin:AbbVie, Inc: Speakers Bureau. Breuleux:Roche: Employment, Equity Ownership; Gilead: Equity Ownership; Basilea: Patents & Royalties; Novartis: Patents & Royalties. Masud:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sail:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Komlosi:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Walter and Eliza Hall: Employment, Patents & Royalties; AbbVie, Inc: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document