Maintaining Perioperative Hemostasis in Patients with Severe Hemophilia A and Inhibitors Receiving Emicizumab Prophylaxis

Abstract Introduction: Patients with severe hemophilia A and anti-factor VIII (fVIII) antibodies (inhibitors) are at risk of significant bleeding during invasive procedures. Prior to the introduction of the bispecific humanized antibody, emicizumab, the standard of care for preventing perioperative bleeding in these patients consisted of repeated doses of bypassing agents such as recombinant activated factor VII (rfVIIa) and activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCCs) or high-doses of fVIII products. This practice often prolonged hospital admission and was associated with increased patient-care costs. Prophylaxis with emicizumab has significantly reduced bleeding symptoms in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors. However, questions regarding the appropriate management of acute bleeding episodes and invasive procedures in patients receiving this novel therapy remain unanswered. Additionally, there are concerns about the hemostatic efficacy and safety of fVIII products and bypassing agents necessary for the management of perioperative bleeding and breakthrough bleeds in patients with inhibitors treated with emicizumab. In this case series, we report on the perioperative management and outcomes of patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis who underwent invasive procedures. Methods: Patients between the ages of 1 - 60 years old with severe hemophilia A (fVIII activity <1%) with a history of low or high titer inhibitors on emicizumab prophylaxis treated at the Emory Pediatric Hemophilia Treatment Center, the Center for Bleeding and Clotting Disorders at the University of Minnesota Medical Center, the Michigan State University Center for Bleeding and Clotting Disorders, and the Children's Hospital of Michigan/Wayne State University were included in this analysis. All patients were continued on their emicizumab prophylaxis throughout the perioperative period. Due to the potential risk of thrombosis and thrombotic microangiopathy with aPCCs, these agents were avoided and rfVIIa was the preferred bypassing agent. Either recombinant (r) fVIII or plasma-derived (pd) fVIII were used in patients that had known response to high-dose fVIII. Perioperative treatment regimens, bleeding symptoms, and complications were monitored. Results: Seven patients underwent invasive procedures while on emicizumab prophylaxis and an additional two patients had minor procedures performed that required observation alone. These patients have historical peak inhibitor titers, defined as the highest inhibitor titer prior to starting emicizumab ranging from 2.0 - 4,792 BU/mL. Their inhibitor titers prior to the procedure ranged from 0 - 193.3 BU/mL. All patients initiated emicizumab prophylaxis at a median of 12 weeks prior to their procedures (range: 2 - 28 weeks). All 4 of the pediatric patients requiring invasive procedures underwent central venous access device (CVAD) - related procedures. The 3 adult patients requiring invasive procedures underwent removal of an infected penile prosthesis, a complex dental extraction consisting of 4 extractions and 1 alveoloplasty, and a right elbow synovectomy with radial head excision. Six patients were admitted to the inpatient hematology service for observation for a median of 48 hours (range: 24 - 168 hours) following their procedures. No patient required readmission after hospital discharge. All patients experienced minimal blood loss perioperatively, and none required transfusions of blood products. The patient undergoing CVAD removal developed a hematoma at the prior port site noted 1 week post-procedure that responded to rfVIIa 90 mcg/kg once daily for 2 days. A second patient had mild surgical site bleeding 1 week post-procedure, which responded to one dose of rfVIIa (90 mcg/kg). No other patient had bleeding complications, and no patient experienced thrombosis or thrombotic microangiopathy. The perioperative management plans are outlined in Table 1. Conclusions: This is the largest case series outside of the HAVEN series detailing the perioperative management of severe hemophilia A patients with a history of low or high titer inhibitors receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. During these invasive procedures, these patients required decreased dosing of fVIII products or bypassing agents and experienced minimal complications. Minor procedures were able to be completed with observation alone. Disclosures Zimowski: National Hemophilia Association/Shire: Other: Funding for clinical fellowship in Hemostasis/Thrombosis. Batsuli:Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Genentech: Other: Advisory Board; Octapharma: Other: Advisory Board. Reding:Genentech: Other: Advisory Board. Callaghan:Global Blood Therepeutics: Employment; Amgen: Employment; Octapharma: Honoraria; Novo Nordisk: Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Hema Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Roche/Genentech: Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Grifols: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioverativ: Honoraria; Sancilio Pharmaceuticals Company: Employment; Pfizer: Employment, Honoraria, Research Funding. Meeks:HEMA Biologics: Other: Advisory Board; Genentech: Other: Advisory Board; Catalyst Biosciences: Other: Advisory Board; CSL Behring: Other: Advisory Board; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Bioverativ: Other: Advisory Board; Shire: Other: Advisory Board; Pfizer: Research Funding. Sidonio:Uniqure: Other: Advisory Board; Novo Nordisk: Other: Advisory Board; Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Kedrion: Research Funding; Shire: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Octapharma: Other: Advisory Board; Biomarin: Other: Advisory Board; Bioverativ: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Grifols: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Other: Advisory Board.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of Severe Hemophilia a Patients on Continuous Prophylaxis Relative to Inhibitor Status in the Community Counts Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1405.1405 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1405-1405

Author(s):

Marilyn J. Manco-Johnson ◽

Vanessa R. Byams ◽

Roshni Kulkarni ◽

Brandi Dupervil ◽

Becky Dudley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Bleeding Disorders ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Opioid Use ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Active Inhibitor ◽

History Of ◽

Bypassing Agents

Abstract Background: Continuous prophylaxis, or the routine replacement of deficient clotting factor, is the standard of care therapy for individuals with severe hemophilia A and joint bleeding. In the United States (US), the majority of eligible patients are prescribed continuous prophylaxis, including approximately 75% of children < 20 years of age. However, up to 30% of severe hemophilia A patients develop neutralizing alloantibodies that render factor replacement ineffective requiring inhibitor eradication through induction of immune tolerance (ITI) therapy. Tolerized patients demonstrate successful elimination of inhibitors and normal response to FVIII concentrates. Non-tolerized patients can also be treated on prophylaxis using bypassing agents. Aim: This analysis used national surveillance data to compare joint and other outcomes in persons with severe hemophilia A on continuous prophylaxis in three groups: no history of an inhibitor, likely tolerized inhibitor and active (non-tolerized) inhibitor. Methods: The Community Counts bleeding disorders surveillance project is funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) through a cooperative agreement awarded to the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN) in partnership with the US Hemophilia Treatment Center Network (USHTCN). The Registry for Bleeding Disorders Surveillance component collects detailed medical information on patients with bleeding disorders who receive treatment within the USHTCN. Likely tolerized inhibitors were defined as having a history of a previous inhibitor and currently being treated with FVIII concentrate; active inhibitors were defined as having a history of a previous inhibitor and being treated with bypassing agents. Using the Registry component, the following data elements, stratified by age and inhibitor status, were extracted from the initial visit form: demographics, treatment regimen, mobility, cumulative joint bleeding, invasive joint procedures, pain and opioid use. Results: Data on 1,300 persons with severe hemophilia A were analyzed including: 739 with a negative inhibitor history; 410 likely tolerized inhibitor patients; and 151 with an active inhibitor. The 410 patients represented 73% of participants with a positive inhibitor history, similar to the North American Inhibitor Registry (DiMichele D, Haemophilia 2009;15:320-8). Participants with likely tolerized inhibitors were treated using continuous prophylaxis in similar proportion to participants with no history of inhibitor (83% vs 78%, respectively), and more often than participants with active inhibitor (83% vs 65%); however outcomes of participants on continuous prophylaxis were similar in all three groups (Table 1). Patients < 20 years of age had less disability, and fewer joint bleeds, invasive procedures, pain and opioid use compared with adult participants. Conclusions: Improved outcomes on preventive strategies may be best determined prospectively in younger patients due to the lesser degree of established morbidity. Persons with severe hemophilia A on continuous prophylaxis with likely tolerized inhibitors (using FVIII) or with active inhibitors (using bypassing agents) demonstrate outcomes similar to those without inhibitors. However, more age- and treatment regimen- stratified analysis is needed for more precise comparisons. Future findings may contribute to the perspective that prophylaxis should be the standard of care for all hemophilia patients regardless of inhibitor status. Disclosures Manco-Johnson: Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Baxalta: Honoraria; NovoNordisk: Honoraria; BiogenIdec: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Honoraria. Kulkarni:Baxter: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BPL: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biogen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Buckner:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Baxalta: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Lack of Inhibitor Development in the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN)-2 Factor Switching Study: Preliminary Report of Primary Outcome

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128612 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1114-1114

Author(s):

Robert F. Sidonio ◽

Dunlei Cheng ◽

Christine Guelcher ◽

Janna M. Journeycake ◽

Susan U Lattimore ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Factor Viii ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Half Life ◽

Research Funding ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Inhibitor Development

Introduction: With many standard half-life (SHL) and extended half-life (EHL) recombinant factor VIII and factor IX products licensed in the US over the last 6 years, it is likely that previously treated patients (PTPs) will consider switching to a new EHL FVIII or FIX product. Although past product switching surveillance suggests no increased inhibitor development risk, there is the need for a real-world data on the incidence of inhibitor development following switching from SHL to EHL rFVIII or rFIX in PTPs with hemophilia A and B. Methods: A longitudinal, observational study of participants with Hemophilia A or B who switched to a rFVIII or rFIX concentrate licensed after Jan 1, 2013. The study included retrospective (switched within 50 exposure days (EDs) and prospective arms. Participants were recruited from ATHN-affiliated Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTCs). The primary outcome measure was the development of a new inhibitor (i.e. neutralizing antibodies to factor VIII or IX) a 1 year or during the 50 EDs following the product switch. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, 10 EDs and 50 EDs. Inclusion criteria include moderate or severe hemophilia A/B currently on a plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII or FIX concentrate with planned or recent switch to an EHL FVIII or FIX concentrate approved after Jan 1, 2013. Participants with an active inhibitor at time of enrollment or undergoing ITI or switched to a non-factor product were excluded. Results: 303 hemophilia participants from 27 treatment centers were enrolled from 2015 to June 2019. The median age at enrollment was 17 years (IQR 10-32 years). 300 of 303 participants were male, Caucasian (72.6%) and had private insurance (44.9%). 74.3% were FVIII deficient and 25.7% were FIX deficient. Most had severe hemophilia A or B, 82.3% (n=237) and 12.8% (n=37) had a prior history of inhibitor but were negative at the time of enrollment. Prior to the switching, 92.1% (n=197) and 7.9% (n=17) of hemophilia A participants took standard rFVIII or pdFVIII respectively, while 87.8% (n=65) and 12.2% (n=9) of hemophilia B participants took standard rFIX or pdFIX, respectively. The three most frequent switching reasons were extended half-life consideration (n=192; 66.7%), a desire for a longer acting version (n=55; 19.1%) and less than expected clinical response to the current product (n=15; 5.2%). Among 214 participants with hemophilia A, 182 (85.0%) switched to FVIII EHL products while 23 (10.7%) switched to new SHL FVIII. For nine patients (4.2%) switching product information was not available. 72 out of 74 (97.3%) participants with hemophilia B that switched products, switched to an EHL rFIX. Eleven hemophilia participants (six A and five B) entered a second cycle of switching after the completion of the first switching cycle. Following that, four switched to FVIII EHL products, two to new SHL rFVIII and five to rFIX EHL products. A total of 193 (63.7%; 148 FVIII, 45 FIX) participants completed the clinical trial while 36 (11.9%; 26 FVIII, 10 FIX) did not complete the trial and 74 (24.4%) are ongoing in the trial. None of 303 (0%) enrolled participants developed an inhibitor, the primary outcome for this study, through data updated 6/2019. Variability was noted in per-site enrollment. The median enrollment per Hemophilia Treatment Center (HTC) was 10, the IQR was 7-16 with a range of 1-31. The types of factors associated with patients switches are summarized in the figure. Conclusion: No new inhibitors were noted among 303 moderate/severe hemophilia A/B PTPs without active inhibitors at entry, who switched factor VIII or IX products over 50 exposure days or 12 months. This result provides real-world evidence of the rarity of inhibitor development after a product switch in PTPs. The study also achieved a key logistical objective: to demonstrate feasibility of a prospective observational study across ATHN sites. Figure Legend: Factor types to which ATHN-2 patients switched during the study. Disclosures Sidonio: Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Uniqure: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Research Funding; Takeda-Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biomarin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Guelcher:Takeda: Other: Advisory Board; Genetech: Other: Advisory Board; NovoNordisk: Other: Advisory Board; Octapharma: Other: Advisory Board. Takemoto:genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; novartis: Other: DSMB membership. Tarantino:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Michael Tarantino, MD SC: Other: President, Owner- Private Practice ; Magellan Healthcare: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Clinical Trial PI, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy; Grifols: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bleeding and Clotting Disorders Institute: Employment; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grant Reviewer , Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Neufeld:Octapharma, Agios, Acceleron, Grifols, Pfizer, CSL Behring, Shire Pharmaceuticals (Baxalta), Novo Nordisk, ApoPharma, Genentech, Novartis, Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy; Octapharma, Shire Pharmaceuticals (Baxalta), Novo Nordisk, Celgene, NHLBI/NIH: Research Funding; Octapharma: Other: study investigator, NuProtect study (Octapharma-sponsored).

Download Full-text

Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE) Study: A Perioperative Management Plan for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Receiving a Direct Oral Anticoagulant

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-120770 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. LBA-5-LBA-5 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

James Douketis ◽

Alex C. Spyropoulos ◽

Joanne M Duncan ◽

Marc Carrier ◽

Gregoire Le Gal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Perioperative Management ◽

Elective Surgery ◽

Bleeding Risk ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Arterial Thromboembolism ◽

High Bleeding Risk

Abstract Introduction: The perioperative management of patients who are taking a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) and require an elective surgery/procedure is uncertain. No studies have addressed the timing of perioperative DOAC interruption and resumption, and if perioperative heparin bridging and coagulation function testing are needed. The Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE) Study hypothesized that a simple, standardized perioperative management strategy, based on DOAC-specific interruption and resumption intervals, that foregoes perioperative heparin bridging and coagulation function testing, is safe for patient care, with associated low rates of major bleeding (1%) and arterial thromboembolism (0.5%). We postulated that this management yields a high proportion of patients (>90%) with a minimal to no DOAC level at surgery/procedure. Methods: PAUSE is a prospective study with 3 parallel DOAC cohorts of patients with AF taking apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban and requiring anticoagulant interruption for an elective surgery/procedure. Patients were managed using a standardized protocol based on DOAC pharmacokinetic properties, procedure-associated bleeding risk (Appendix 1) and creatinine clearance (CrCl). DOACs were interrupted for 1 day before and after surgery for a low bleed risk surgery and 2 days before and after a high bleed surgery; longer interruption was done in patients on dabigatran with a CrCl<50 mL/min (Figure 1). A blood sample was obtained just before the procedure to measure residual DOAC levels (Appendix 2). Heparin bridging and preoperative coagulation testing were not used to manage patients. Patient follow-up occurred weekly for 30 days post-procedure for the primary clinical outcomes of major bleeding and arterial thromboembolism (Appendix 3). The incidence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of clinical outcomes was determined for each DOAC cohort using an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (interrupted at least 1 DOAC dose) and per-protocol analysis (adhering to DOAC interruption and resumption protocol). Results: We enrolled 3007 patients from 23 sites in Canada, the U.S. and Europe (Appendix 4). The patient characteristics were (Figure 2): mean age 72.5 years; 66.1% male; 33.5% high bleeding risk surgery/procedure, with 1257 patients in the apixaban cohort, 668 in the dabigatran cohort and 1082 in the rivaroxaban cohort (Table 1). DOAC interruption and resumption intervals are shown in Table 2. The 30-day postoperative rate (95% CI) of major bleeding was 1.35% (0-2.00) in the apixaban cohort, 0.90% (0-1.73) in the dabigatran cohort and 1.85% (0-2.65) in the rivaroxaban cohort; the rate (95% CI) of arterial thromboembolism was 0.16% (0-0.48) in the apixaban cohort, 0.6% (0-1.33) in the dabigatran cohort and 0.37% (0-0.82) in the rivaroxaban cohort (Table 3). There were 2541 (84.5%) patients with preoperative DOAC levels measured: a level <50 ng/ml occurred in 90.5% of patients in the apixaban cohort, in 95.1% of the dabigatran cohort and in 96.8% of the rivaroxaban cohort. Of 1007 patients having a high bleeding risk procedure, 832 (82.6%) had DOAC levels measured: 98.8% had a level <50 ng/mL (Table 4). Rates of major bleeding and arterial thromboembolism in the per protocol analysis were comparable to those of the ITT analysis (Table 5). Conclusions: In patients with AF who were taking a DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban) and required anticoagulant interruption for an elective surgery/procedure, using a standardized DOAC-specific perioperative management strategy was safe for patient care, with associated low rates of perioperative MB (<2%) and ATE (<1%). Further, a high proportion of patients (>90% overall; 98.8% at high bleeding risk) had a minimal or no residual DOAC level at the time of the surgery/procedure. PAUSE is the largest study, to date, that addresses how to manage the common problem of perioperative DOAC management. It is likely to have a practice-changing impact and will inform future practice guidelines in perioperative care. Study Funding: CIHR (313156) and the H&S Foundation of Canada (G-14-0006136). Aniara-Hyphen Biomed (assays). Acknowledgments: We thank Drs. Walter Ageno, David Garcia, Lehana Thabane, Wendt Lim, Lori Linkins, William Ristevski, and Demetrios J. Sahlas. Also, Kayla Lucier, Grace Wang, Tara McDougall, and HRLMP and CRLB. Supported by CanVector and REDCap. Disclosures Douketis: Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Other: Advisory Board; Biotie: Other: Advisory Board; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory Board; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; The Medicines Company: Other: Advisory Board; Sanofi: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Astra-Zeneca: Other: Advisory Board; Portola: Other: Advisory Board; Pfizer: Other: Advisory Board. Spyropoulos:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy. Carrier:Bayer: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vanassche:Bayer: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; BMS/Pfizer: Consultancy. Verhamme:Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Medtronic: Honoraria; Portola: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shivakumar:Pfizer: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; LEO Pharma: Honoraria. Gross:Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; LEO Pharma: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria. Lee:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria; LEO Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Le Templier:BMS-pfizer: Honoraria. Wu:Leo Pharma: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS-Pfizer: Honoraria. Coppens:Bayer: Honoraria, Other: Non-financial support, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Other: non-financial support, Research Funding; Uniqure BV: Research Funding. Arnold:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; UCB: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; UCB: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Caprini:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Recovery Force: Consultancy; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizor: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen R&D: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Summer:Octapharma: Honoraria. Schulman:Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Severe Bleeding Events in Hemophilia Α Patients Receiving Emicizumab Prophylaxis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126659 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1126-1126

Author(s):

Karen L. Zimowski ◽

Glaivy M. Batsuli ◽

Paulette Bryant ◽

Jenny McDaniel ◽

Kelly Tickle ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Severe Bleeding ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Acute Bleeding ◽

Fviii Activity ◽

Bleeding Episodes

Introduction : Emicizumab is a novel humanized bispecific antibody that mimics the function of activated coagulation factor VIII (fVIII). It has significantly changed the management of patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors by achieving baseline hemostatic control. Based on the HAVEN studies, emicizumab markedly reduces annualized bleeding rates and is FDA-approved for prophylaxis in hemophilia A patients of all ages, regardless of inhibitor status. In the HAVEN2 interim analysis, only 3/57 pediatric patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis required treatment for an acute bleeding event after a 9-week median observation time. We report 3 patients with severe hemophilia A and a history of inhibitors receiving emicizumab prophylaxis with severe or refractory bleeding episodes to highlight the importance of vigilance and surveillance of children with severe hemophilia A on emicizumab. Methods: This retrospective analysis includes patients between 0-21 years of age with severe hemophilia A (fVIII activity < 1%) receiving emicizumab prophylaxis and admitted for the management of an acute bleeding episode following emicizumab's FDA approval in November 2017. Patients were followed at the Pediatric Hemophilia Treatment Center at the Hemophilia of Georgia Center for Bleeding & Clotting Disorders of Emory and the St. Jude Affiliate Clinic at Novant Health Hemby Children's Hospital. Data collected included demographics, past medical history including inhibitor status, bleeding history, and treatment modalities, and details regarding the presentation, management, and outcome of acute severe bleeding events. Due to the nature of the study, descriptive statistics were primarily used for data analysis. Results: Three patients with severe hemophilia A receiving emicizumab prophylaxis were admitted for the management of 4 severe bleeding episodes. All patients had a history of a fVIII inhibitor. Three of the 4 bleeding episodes were trauma-induced while 1 occurred spontaneously. For the traumatic episodes, all patients presented with worsening symptoms approximately 1 week following the inciting event. All patients had a normal aPTT at the time of presentation, ruling out a significant anti-drug antibody (emicizumab level not available). A patient with a low-titer inhibitor developed an epidural hematoma following a trampoline injury and was treated with continuous infusion of recombinant factor VIII (rfVIII), adjusting the rate to achieve chromogenic fVIII activity of 100% for 14 days. Following 14 days, he was started on rfVIII 50 IU/kg Q12 hours with a goal fVIII activity of 50%. His rfVIII dosing interval was gradually weaned to every other day while in inpatient rehabilitation. As outlined in Table 1, the remaining 3 bleeding events were initially managed with recombinant activated factor VII (rfVIIa) dosed at 80-90 mcg/kg/dose with escalating frequency for an average of 8 days. However, due to lack of improvement, treatment was changed to low-dose activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC; 10-15 IU/kg/dose Q12-24 hours for an average of 7 days). In all 3 of these events, the hematomas improved after treatment with aPCC. No patient experienced thrombotic microangiopathy, thrombosis, or had evidence of DIC while receiving these treatment regimens. Discussion/Conclusion: Pharmacokinetic analysis of emicizumab suggests that following the standard 4-week loading phase, trough plasma emicizumab concentrations obtained prior to a 1.5 mg/kg once weekly maintenance dose correlates with at least 10-15 IU/dL equivalent fVIII activity. This degree of thrombin generation should be sufficient to prevent severe spontaneous bleeding episodes in most patients. However it does not preclude significant trauma-induced bleeding or spontaneous bleeding in inhibitor patients. Based on our cases, providers should maintain a high index of suspicion for acute bleeding in patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. Serious bleeding events, although rare, may have a more insidious onset in patients receiving emicizumab. Furthermore, despite the baseline hemostasis achieved with emicizumab, acute bleeding events may still require aggressive therapy. Our cases suggest that low-dose aPCC or continuous infusion fVIII may be feasible options for treating acute bleeding events in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. Disclosures Zimowski: Pfizer: Research Funding; National Hemophilia Foundation: Other: Medical Loan Reimbursement, Research Funding. Batsuli:Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bryant:Novo Nordisk: Other: PI on Novo Nordisk sponsored Studies. McDaniel:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tickle:National Hemophilia Foundation: Research Funding. Meeks:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda-Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; HEMA Biologics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sidonio:Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda-Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biomarin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Uniqure: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase II Trial of Rituximab in the Treatment of Inhibitors in Congenital Hemophilia A: Results of the RICH Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.27.27 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 27-27 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Cindy A. Leissinger ◽

Rebecca Kruse-Jarres ◽

Suzanne Granger ◽

Barbara A Konkle ◽

Margaret V. Ragni ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Null Hypothesis ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

High Titer ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Minor Response ◽

Inhibitor Titer

Abstract Abstract 27 Antibodies (inhibitors) to exogenously administered factor VIII (FVIII) develop in as many as 30 – 40% of patients with severe hemophilia A. Patients with persistent inhibitors are at increased risk of serious, poorly controlled bleeding which results in significant morbidity and in some cases early death. Rituximab, a chimeric murine/human monoclonal antibody directed against CD20, suppresses circulating and tissue B cells and pre-B cells and has been used in the treatment of a variety of autoimmune and alloimmune disorders. The primary objective of this NHLBI Transfusion Medicine Hemostasis network-sponsored study was to evaluate the role of rituximab as an approach to inhibit the production of FVIII antibodies in patients with severe congenital hemophilia A and high titer inhibitors. Methods: This was a prospective, multi-institution, single-arm, open-label Phase II trial. Eligible subjects were males over 18 months of age with severe hemophilia A and a history of an inhibitor ≥5 Bethesda units (BU). Individuals who were HIV positive, undergoing immune tolerance, or receiving immune modulating therapies were excluded. Following a challenge dose of recombinant FVIII (rAHF-PFM) at 50 IU/kg, and evidence of an inhibitor titer ≥ 5 BU at 5 – 14 days after the challenge dose, subjects received rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks. Starting two weeks after the fourth rituximab treatment, inhibitor titers were drawn every 4 weeks. A major response was defined as a fall in the inhibitor titer to < 5 BU at any time up to and including week 22, with the titer remaining < 5 BU following re-challenge with FVIII. A minor response was defined as inhibitor falling to < 5 BU at any time up to and including week 22, with the anamnestic peak following re-challenge with FVIII between 5–10 BU and less than 50% of the original anamnestic peak. The null hypothesis was that no more than 5% of subjects treated with rituximab would be major responders. Results: A total of 23 subjects were enrolled; 21 received the initial FVIII challenge. Of these, 4 subjects did not meet the criteria to receive rituximab treatment, and 1 subject withdrew consent. A total of 16 subjects received at least one dose of rituximab and are included in this analysis. The median age was 14 y (range 4 – 38 y). Three subjects (18.8%) had a major response. If the null hypothesis were true, the probability of 3 or more major responses in 16 subjects would be 0.043, so the null hypothesis was rejected. One subject (6.2%) had a minor response to treatment. All 4 responders and 8 non-responders had a baseline inhibitor titer < 20 BU, resulting in a response rate of 33% in that group vs. 0% in the 4 subjects with a baseline inhibitor titer ≥ 20 BU. Discussion: Infusion of rituximab 375 mg/m2 once per week for four weeks was effective in reducing the anamnestic inhibitor response in 25% of severe hemophilia A subjects with inhibitors who were not receiving concurrent immune tolerance therapy. Those who responded tended to have lower baseline inhibitor levels compared to the group that did not meet the criteria for response. This Phase II study, designed as a proof of concept, demonstrated that rituximab may be useful in lowering inhibitor levels and anamnesis in some patients with inhibitors, but that the effect as a solo treatment strategy is modest, and possibly restricted to patients with inhibitor titers under 20 BU. Further studies are indicated to determine the role of rituximab as an adjunctive therapy in immune tolerization strategies. Acknowledgments: The authors acknowledge the support of Genentech for the provision of rituximab and partial financial support for the study. The authors also acknowledge Baxter Healthcare Corporation for donating the recombinant FVIII used in the trial. Disclosures: Leissinger: Baxter: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Rituximab, a drug approved for use in treating lymphoma, was studied for its efficacy in suppressing inhibitors against factor VIII in patients with hemophilia and high titer inhibitors. Kruse-Jarres:Baxter: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer:; Griforls: Consultancy, Honoraria; Inspiration: Consultancy, Honoraria; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria. Konkle:Baxter Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer Corp: Consultancy; Inspiration Biopharmaceuticals: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Neufeld:Genentech: Research Funding; Baxter: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Bennett:Biogen IDEC: Honoraria. Valentino:Baxter Bioscience, Bayer Healthcare, GTC Biotherapeutics, NovoNordisk, Pfizer, CSL Behring, Inspiration Bioscience, and Biogen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Longitudinal Analysis of Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Recombinant Factor VIII Fc Fusion Protein (rFVIIFc) in Adults/Adolescents with Severe Hemophilia a

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1413.1413 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1413-1413

Author(s):

Barbara Konkle ◽

K John Pasi ◽

David J Perry ◽

Johnny Mahlangu ◽

Savita Rangarajan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Treatment Group ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Dosing Intervals

Abstract Background: Prophylactic replacement of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) is the standard of care for patients with hemophilia A; however, prophylaxis with conventional FVIII products usually requires frequent intravenous injections (3-4 times/week). The safety, efficacy, and prolonged half-life of rFVIIIFc in previously treated adults and adolescents (≥12 y) with severe hemophilia A were demonstrated in the phase 3 A-LONG study (NCT01181128, completed) and ASPIRE extension study (NCT01454739, ongoing). Here, we report cumulative long-term data on the safety and efficacy of rFVIIIFc in study participants as of the second interim data cut (8 Dec 2014). Methods: This longitudinal analysis includes cumulative data from A-LONG and ASPIRE (as of the second interim data cut 8 Dec 2014) for subjects treated with ≥1 dose of rFVIIIFc. A-LONG evaluated 2 prophylaxis regimens-individualized (IP): 25 IU/kg on Day 1 and 50 IU/kg on Day 4 to start, then 25-65 IU/kg every 3-5 days, to target a 1-3 IU/dL FVIII trough level, and weekly (WP): 65 IU/kg dosed once weekly-as well as episodic (on-demand) treatment (ET). Subjects completing A-LONG and meeting enrollment criteria for ASPIRE could participate in the IP, WP, or ET groups, or, if optimal dosing could not be achieved with IP or WP, in an additional modified prophylaxis (MP) group. Subjects could change treatment groups at any point during ASPIRE. Efficacy analyses were performed using data summarized according to the treatment group in which each subject participated, for the time period they were in that treatment group; thus, subjects may be included in the analysis of more than one group. Outcomes evaluated included: incidence of inhibitors (neutralizing antibody value ≥0.6 BU/mL identified and confirmed on 2 separate samples drawn approximately 2-4 weeks apart and performed by the central laboratory as measured by the Nijmegen-modified Bethesda assay), adverse events (AEs), annualized bleeding rate (ABR), treatment of acute bleeds, and prophylactic consumption and dosing interval compared to pre-A-LONG (prestudy). Results: Of 164 subjects dosed with rFVIIIFc during A-LONG, 153 completed the study and 150 enrolled in ASPIRE; at the time of this second interim data cut, 97 subjects were ongoing in ASPIRE, 40 subjects had completed the study, and 13 subjects withdrew. Cumulatively, subjects had 38,662 rFVIIIFc exposure days (EDs), inclusive of surgery. As of this second interim data cut (8 Dec 2014), no inhibitors were observed; the type and incidence of adverse events (AEs) observed were typical of previous hemophilia A populations studied. There were no reports of anaphylaxis or serious hypersensitivity events, and no serious vascular thrombotic events. Median ABRs for subjects on IP and WP (MP was not an option during A-LONG) were lower with rFVIIIFc compared with prestudy FVIII for subjects on prestudy prophylaxis or ET (Figure). In the IP group, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) spontaneous ABRs in Years 1, 2, and 3 on-study were 0.0 (0.0, 2.0), 0.0 (0.0, 1.0), and 0.0 (0.0, 1.0), respectively. In the WP treatment group, the median (IQR) spontaneous ABRs in Years 1, 2, and 3 on-study were 1.0 (0.5, 3.0), 0.5 (0.0, 2.1), and 0.0 (0.0, 1.0), respectively. Overall, 88.5% and 97.0% of bleeding episodes were controlled with 1 or ≤2 intervenous injections, respectively. Among subjects treated with FVIII prophylaxis prestudy (n = 79), 86% were dosed at least 3 times/week prestudy. Compared with prestudy dosing intervals, dosing intervals with rFVIIIFc were extended in 96.2% of subjects, were shortened in 2.5% of subjects, and were unchanged in 1.3% of subjects. The median (IQR) total weekly prophylactic consumption was comparable (prestudy FVIII: 78.0 [60.0, 102.0] IU/kg; on-study rFVIIIFc: 75.0 [70.0, 113.8] IU/kg). Conclusions: Longitudinal data from patients with severe hemophilia A treated with rFVIIIFc in A-LONG and ASPIRE confirm long-term safety, with no inhibitors observed in any subject. Low median ABRs were maintained, and rFVIIIFc demonstrated efficacy in the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes. Prophylactic dosing intervals were extended, without an increase in median prophylactic factor consumption. This research was funded by Biogen and Sobi. Biogen and Sobi reviewed and provided feedback on the abstract. The authors had full editorial control of the abstract and provided their final approval of all content. Disclosures Pasi: Biogen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; SOBI: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Perry:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biogen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mahlangu:Bayer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Speakers Bureau; Biogen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Baxalta: Consultancy. Rangarajan:Baxter: Research Funding; Baxalta, now part of Shire: Other: Investigator Clinical Studies, Research Funding; Biogen: Consultancy; Biotest: Research Funding; Grifols: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding. Brown:Baxter: Consultancy; Biogen: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy. Hanabusa:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KaketsuKen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Biogen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pabinger:Biotest: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cristiano:Biogen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Tsao:Biogen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Winding:Sobi: Employment. Glazebrook:Biogen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lethagen:Sobi: Employment. Jackson:Biogen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Baxalta/Shire: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Baxter: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Target Joint Bleeding in Pediatric Patients with Hemophilia Α Receiving Twice Weekly Prophylaxis with a Pegylated Full-Length Recombinant Factor VIII with Extended Half-Life

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3778.3778 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3778-3778

Author(s):

Amy L. Dunn ◽

Alexis A. Thompson ◽

Werner Engl ◽

Marlies Sharkhawy ◽

Brigitt E. Abbuehl

Keyword(s):

Factor Viii ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Half Life ◽

Research Funding ◽

Pediatric Patients ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Point Estimate ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Mean

Abstract Introduction: Patients with hemophilia A are at risk for acute bleeding which may affect muscles and other soft tissues but characteristically involves joints. Prophylaxis with factor VIII (FVIII) is the optimal treatment to prevent bleeding into joints and, when begun at a young age, may prevent arthropathy. BAX 8551, a polyethylene glycol (peg)ylated, full-length, recombinant FVIII built on ADVATE2, demonstrated extended half-life, efficacy, and safety for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding in patients with severe hemophilia A. Methods: A phase 3, prospective, uncontrolled, multicenter study was performed in pediatric patients with severe hemophilia A without history of inhibitors. To be eligible, patients aged <6 years had to have ≥50, those aged 6 to <12 years ≥150 previous exposure days (EDs) to FVIII. Patients received twice weekly infusions of 50 ±10 IU/kg of BAX 855 over a period of 6 months or ≥50 EDs. The prevalence of target joints, defined as a single joint with ≥3 spontaneous bleeding episodes in any consecutive 6-month period, was assessed at baseline. Annualized rates of target joint bleeds and the course of target joints were evaluated by age (<6 and 6 to <12 years). The study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association. Results:Sixty-six patients were treated with a mean (SD) BAX 855 dose of 51.1 (5.5) IU/kg at a mean (SD) frequency of 1.8 (0.2) infusions/week. Fourteen of 66 patients (21.2%), 3/32 (9.4%) in the younger and 11/34 (32.4%) in the older cohort, had a total of 23 target joints at screening. The number of target joint bleeds decreased during a mean (SD) of 48.5 (7.7; median: 49.0) prophylactic EDs/patient. Five of 66 (7.6%) patients had at least 1 target joint bleed, 1/32 (3.1%) in the younger and 4/34 (11.8%) in the older cohort. The point estimate for the mean (95% CI) annualized rate of target joint bleeds was 0 (0 - infinity; median: 0) compared to an annualized rate of all joint bleeds of 1.1 (0.6 - 1.9; median: 0) and an annualized rate of all bleeds of 3.0 (2.2 - 4.2; median: 2.0) (Table 1). The point estimate for the mean (95% CI) annualized bleeding rate (ABR) in 52 patients without target joints was 2.9 (2.0 - 4.2; median: 2.0) and was similar in 14 patients with target joints at screening at 3.5 (1.9 - 6.6; median: 2.1). In the younger cohort, the ABR was lower in patients with than those without target joints. However, the number of patients <6 years with target joints (N = 3) was too small to draw any conclusions (Table 1). During BAX 855 prophylaxis, no new target joints developed in any patient. Ten of 14 patients had at least 1 target joint revert to a non-target joint. In 8 of these 10 patients, 4 with 1 and 4 with 2 target joints, all target joints resolved. Conclusions:These results suggest that twice weekly infusion of BAX 855 is effective in the prevention of bleeding into target joints and may revert target to non-target joints in pediatric patients with severe hemophilia A. 1BAX 855 (Baxalta US Inc., now part of Shire) is licensed in the US and Japan under the trade name ADYNOVATE. 2ADVATE is a trade mark of Baxalta US Inc., now part of Shire. Disclosures Dunn: NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kedrion: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biogen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxalta (now part of Shire): Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Research Funding. Thompson:Eli Lily: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; bluebird bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; ApoPharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mast: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Baxalta (now part of Shire): Research Funding. Engl:Shire: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sharkhawy:Baxalta (now part of Shire): Employment. Abbuehl:Baxalta (now part of Shire): Employment.

Download Full-text

Early Prophylaxis Provides Continued Joint Protection in Severe Hemophilia A: Results of the Joint Outcome Continuation Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117413 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 382-382 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Beth Boulden Warren ◽

Dianne Thornhill ◽

Jill Stein ◽

Michael Fadell ◽

Sharon Funk ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Soft Tissue ◽

Factor Viii ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Joint Damage ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Episodic Treatment ◽

Bayer Healthcare

Abstract Background: The Joint Outcome Study (JOS) was a randomized controlled trial showing that, in severe hemophilia A, prophylactic factor VIII every other day starting prior to age 30 months leads to better joint outcomes at age 6 years than enhanced episodic treatment with factor VIII for bleeding1. After conclusion of the JOS, all participants were encouraged to continue on, or to transition to, prophylaxis. Here we describe the results of the Joint Outcome Continuation Study (JOS-C), which followed the participants of the JOS to age 18 years. Methods: All participants of the JOS were eligible for the JOS-C. MRIs of 6 index joints (right and left ankles, knees, and elbows), index joint physical exam scores using the Colorado Haemophilia Paediatric Joint Physical Examination Scale2 , estimates of joint bleeding episodes, and surgery information were collected. The primary endpoint, as in the initial JOS analysis, was evidence of hemophilia-related osteochondral joint damage on MRI, scored using the extended MRI scale3. Results: Of the 65 previous participants of the JOS, 37 gave informed consent for the JOS-C study, including 18 initially randomized to prophylaxis prior to age 30 months ("early prophylaxis"), and 19 initially randomized to enhanced episodic treatment who started prophylaxis at a mean age of 7.5 years (median 6.1, range 2.7-17.1, "delayed prophylaxis"). All initially on prophylaxis in the JOS continued on prophylaxis through the JOS-C. One participant (early prophylaxis arm) failed to complete an MRI, and four others (2 early and 2 delayed prophylaxis) had their MRIs excluded for technical reasons. Four participants (3 early prophylaxis and 1 delayed prophylaxis) developed high titer inhibitors during or shortly after the JOS and were analyzed separately. Osteochondral joint damage was defined as evidence of osteochondral damage on MRI or a need for joint surgery. The relative risk of osteochondral damage in those on delayed prophylaxis as compared to those on early prophylaxis was 6.5 (95% CI 1.3, 33.6; p=0.029). At age 18, 67% of those on early prophylaxis, and only 24% of those on delayed prophylaxis had zero index joints with osteochondral damage (Figure 1). Twenty-five percent of early prophylaxis and 47% of delayed prophylaxis participants had osteochondral damage to more than one joint. Most participants had some soft tissue changes on MRI, defined as effusion, synovial hypertrophy, or hemosiderin deposition. There was no difference in risk of soft tissue damage between initial treatment groups (p=0.48). Osteochondral damage scores were available for 3 patients with inhibitors: two with refractory inhibitors had osteochondral changes on at least one joint, and one with an inhibitor that tolerized within 3 months had no osteochondral damage. Total physical exam scores were also higher in the delayed prophylaxis arm (mean 22.6, standard deviation (SD) 15.5) than in the early prophylaxis arm (mean 16.2, SD 10.5), but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.19). Conclusion: The JOS-C demonstrates that, in severe hemophilia A, initiation of prophylaxis prior to age 30 months provides continued protection against joint damage throughout childhood. Those who started on prophylaxis later in childhood had higher risk of joint damage at age 18. Initiation of factor VIII prophylaxis in the toddler years is critical to preventing osteochondral joint damage and should not be delayed. ReferencesManco-Johnson MJ, Abshire TC, Shapiro AD, et al. Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(6):535-544.Hacker MR, Funk SM, Manco-Johnson MJ. The Colorado Haemophilia Paediatric Joint Physical Examination Scale: normal values and interrater reliability. Haemophilia. 2007;13(1):71-78.Hong W, Raunig D, Lundin B. SPINART study: validation of the extended magnetic resonance imaging scale for evaluation of joint status in adult patients with severe haemophilia A using baseline data. Haemophilia. 2016;22(6):e519-e526. Figure 1: Percentage of participants with zero joints with osteochondral damage at JOS exit (age 6 years) and JOS-C exit (age 18 years), excluding participants with inhibitors. Disclosures Warren: Bayer Healthcare: Research Funding; HTRS/Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Bayer Hemophilia Awards Program Fellowship Project Award: Research Funding; CSL Behring Heimburger Award: Research Funding. Shapiro:Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Prometic Life Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Kedrion Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bio Products Laboratory: Consultancy; Bioverativ, a Sanofi Company: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer Healthcare: Other: International Network of Pediatric Hemophilia; Sangamo Biosciences: Consultancy; Octapharma: Research Funding; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; OPKO: Research Funding; BioMarin: Research Funding. Recht:Shire: Research Funding; Biogen: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Manco-Johnson:Bayer AG: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; Biogentek: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Honoraria; Baxalta, now part of Shire: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Real World Use of Extended Half-Life Products and the Impact on Bleeding Events and Joint Health in the United States

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-113956 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1195-1195 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Lynn M. Malec ◽

Char M Witmer ◽

Julie Jaffray ◽

Peter A. Kouides ◽

Kristina M. Haley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Real World ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Hemophilia B ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

On Demand ◽

Joint Health

Abstract Background : The hemophilia treatment landscape has evolved substantially in the last several years with the approval of extended half-life (EHL) products which reduce the burden of prophylaxis. Data reported from the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN) as of June 2017 indicate that 21% of patients with moderate or severe hemophilia A, and 42% of patients with moderate or severe hemophilia B, receive prophylaxis utilizing an EHL. As new treatments become available and are adopted into practice, it is important to recognize the need for evaluation of efficacy, safety, and economic impact of their use outside of the clinical trial setting. We aimed to characterize the real world impact of EHL products by collecting detailed information on bleeding rates, joint health and quality of life amongst patients cared for at ATHN-affiliated Hemophilia Treatment Centers. We hypothesized that use of EHL products were utilized in at least 30% of patients and would lead to decreased ABRs and improved joint health. To date 67 of a planned 135 subjects have been enrolled, constituting this interim analysis. Methods:Subjects were recruited from seven U.S. Hemophilia Treatment Centers. Subjects with severe hemophilia A or B ≤ 30 years of age on prophylaxis or demand therapy were eligible for enrollment. Subjects excluded from study were those with a recent joint bleed (within the last 2 weeks) or those unwilling to complete all elements of the study. Data were collected during a one-time encounter concurrent with an appointment for clinical evaluation, including demographic information, treatment regimen, product type, frequency, location and severity of all bleeds, Hemophilia Joint Health Scores (HJHS), and Quality of life (QoL). Bleeding rates in subjects receiving prophylaxis were compared with those receiving on demand therapy by type treatment, EHL vs standard half-life (SHL), and by hemophilia type. Severity of bleeding events (mild, moderate, or severe) and HJHS were compared by prophylaxis groups. Results: A total of 67 patients were enrolled and eligible for analysis. This included 58 subjects with severe hemophilia A, and 9 subjects with severe hemophilia B. The mean age of the cohort was 15 years (median 12 years, IQR 8 - 21 years). For these patients whose race information was known, 89.1% were Caucasian, 3.3% African-American, 3.3% Asian, and 4.7% were of mixed or 'other' race. Eleven out of 61 (18.0%) subjects with known ethnicity were Hispanic. Among 59 patients whose treatment type were available, the majority were on prophylaxis (n=53; 89.8%) as compared to on demand therapy (n=6; 10.2%). The average annualized bleeding rate (ABR) was 2.8 amongst all individuals. As expected, the ABR was substantially lower in those receiving prophylaxis (ABR=1.0) as compared to on demand therapy (ABR=18.6) (p<0.001). Additionally, HJHS in those receiving prophylaxis was lower (mean HJHS= 3.9), meaning less evidence of joint damage, than in those receiving demand therapy (mean HJHS= 8.8) (p=0.162). For patients with severe hemophilia A, the ABR was lower in those individuals receiving EHL (ABR= 0.5) versus SHL (ABR= 1.5), although this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.136). All subjects with severe hemophilia B enrolled to date receive EHL products (n=9) therefore no comparison of ABR could be made between EHL and SHL products; the ABR in this group was 0.9. In patients with severe hemophilia A, there was a higher HJHS for those receiving EHL (mean HJHS= 7.0) versus those receiving SHL (mean HJHS = 2.1) (p=0.053). For patients with severe hemophilia B, all of whom received EHL, the mean HJHS was lower than in the hemophilia A cohort (mean HJHS=1.2). Conclusions: We report real-world bleeding events and joint health in patients with severe hemophilia A and B utilizing EHL and SHL products across a wide U.S. geographic distribution. As anticipated, there is substantial bleed reduction with prophylaxis versus on demand therapy. In our severe hemophilia A cohort, the ABR for patients receiving EHL products was similar to ABRs reported in clinical trials, suggesting clinical trial data may be reflective of real world use. Patients with severe hemophilia A receiving EHL for prophylaxis had a lower ABR than those receiving SHL, although the early impact is not reflected in the HJHS score. Longer follow-up will be necessary to determine the impact of EHL on HJHS. Disclosures Malec: Bioverativ: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy. Jaffray:Octapharma: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kouides:UniQure: Other: DSMB; Octapharma: Research Funding. Sidonio:Octapharma: Other: Advisory Board; Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Other: Advisory Board; Shire: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Other: Advisory Board; Kedrion: Research Funding; Biomarin: Other: Advisory Board; Grifols: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Bioverativ: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Uniqure: Other: Advisory Board. Abshire:CSL: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Other: DSMB. White:Asklepios: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Shire: Other: Physician Leadership Group; Bayer: Other: GRAC; Bioverativ: Other: DSMB; Biomarin: Other: DSMB; Invitrox: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Pfizer: Equity Ownership. Ragni:CSL Behring: Research Funding; Biomarin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; SPARK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Research Funding; Alnylam: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Sangamo: Research Funding; MOGAM: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

99.3% of Inhibitors in Severe Hemophilia a Develop before Exposure Day 75. Time to Change Definition of Previously Treated Patients; Data from 1038 Patients with Severe Hemophilia a of the Pednet Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114518 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2472-2472

Author(s):

Marijke Van den Berg ◽

Kathelijn Fischer ◽

Elena Santagostino ◽

Herve Chambost ◽

Karin Kurnik ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Inhibitor Development ◽

Previously Treated Patients ◽

Previously Treated ◽

Definition Of

Abstract Introduction.In patients with hemophilia treated with factor VIII products, the development of inhibitory antibodies poses the largest safety risk. Especially during the first 50 exposure days (EDs), up to 37% of patients with severe hemophilia A have been reported to develop an inhibitor. To study neo-immunogenicity of products and new treatment strategies, patients have been distinguished into previously untreated (PUPs) and previously treated patients (PTPs); the latter defined as patients treated for more than 150 EDs. The number of 150 EDs was established in the eighties during a time when most patients received on-demand treatment and testing for inhibitors was not frequently performed. More recent studies on inhibitor incidence in PUPs with severe hemophilia A report that 50% of inhibitors develop within 14-15 EDs, however the cut-off number of EDs for a PUP to become a PTP is not well defined. The aim of this study was to define the number of EDs for PUPs to become PTPs based on long-term follow-up of patients with severe hemophilia A Methods.All patients with severe hemophilia A born after January 1, 2000, treated for at least 1 ED and followed prospectively until inhibitor development or the number of EDs at last follow-up, were included. The number of EDs at inhibitor development is the last exposure day before the first positive titer was reported. An inhibitor was defined as positive when at least two positive inhibitor titers were measured. Positivity was defined according to the cut-off level in each individual center's laboratory. Results.Of 1,038 PUPs with severe hemophilia A, 930 (89.6%) were followed until 75 EDs, 429 until 500 EDs and 212 until 1000 EDs. In total, 300 inhibitors developed, of which 298 (99.3%) within the first 75 EDs. Thereafter only two inhibitors developed, both low titer: after 249 and 264 EDs. Conclusion.Almost all inhibitors develop during the first 75 EDs. Patients with severe hemophilia A can be defined as PTP after 75 instead of 150 exposure days. A change of definition of PTP will increase the number of severe hemophilia A patients eligible for new therapies. Disclosures Santagostino: Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Male:SOBI: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Oldenburg:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biogen Idec: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biotest: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Swedish Orphan Biovitrum: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Liesner:Baxalta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Other: Clinical study investigator for NuProtect Study (Octapharma sponsored), Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Carcao:Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL-Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; LFB: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioverativ/Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biotest: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nolan:CSL Behring: Research Funding; Sobi: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Álvarez-Roman:Shire: Consultancy; NovoNordisk: Consultancy; SOBI: Consultancy. Koenigs:Gilead: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Intersero: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Roche/Chugai: Consultancy; EU (IMI, FP7): Research Funding; Sobi: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jansen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text