scholarly journals Preliminary Safety and Efficacy Results with an Intermittent Schedule of the PI3kδ Inhibitor ME-401 Alone or in Combination with Rituximab for B-Cell Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2893-2893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew D. Zelenetz ◽  
Jacob D. Soumerai ◽  
Deepa Jagadeesh ◽  
Nishitha Reddy ◽  
Anastasios Stathis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Intermittent Schedule ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background: ME-401, a potent and selective oral PI3kδ inhibitor, achieved a high rate of early and durable responses in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) when administered once daily in 28-day cycles on a continuous schedule (CS) in a dose escalation Phase 1b study (Soumerai et al, ASCO 2018:#7519). The most common adverse events (AEs) were the delayed onset (beyond Cycle 2) of grade 3 diarrhea and rash, which were reversible with drug interruption and/or corticosteroids. These delayed AEs were thought to be due to pathway inhibition in regulatory T cells (Treg) leading to a disruption in immune homeostasis. We hypothesized that an intermittent schedule (IS) beyond Cycle 2 might mitigate or reduce the incidence of significant delayed AEs. The IS tested was selected based on the kinetics of Treg repopulation, and consists of ME-401 administered on days 1-7 of a 28-day cycle. We report preliminary results of this strategy. Methods: Group 1 included 31 patients with relapsed FL (n = 22) or CLL/SLL (n = 9) who received ME-401 on a CS at doses ≥60 mg per day. 11/29 patients (38%) who received >2 cycles of therapy had developed delayed grade 3 AEs on CS and could be re-challenged with either the CS or IS (from December 2017 onward) following recovery from toxicity. The other 18/29 patients (62%) had not developed a grade 3 AEs of interest on CS and, beginning in December 2017, were switched to IS after a median of 26 weeks (range, 8-49) of daily dosing. Group 2 included 15 patients with relapsed FL (n = 9), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 4), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL, n = 1), and CLL (n = 1) who received rituximab 375 mg/m2 x 8 doses over 6 months and ME-401 at 60 mg daily x 2 cycles then switched to the IS. Group 3 includes 30 patients with relapsed FL/CLL/SLL enrolling in an expansion cohort of ME-401 alone at 60 mg daily x 2 cycles then switching to IS. Results: Group 1: Of the 11 patients who developed a delayed grade 3 AE on CS, 6 were never re-challenged, 2 were re-challenged with CS with recurrence of their AE, and 3 were re-challenged with IS without recurrence of their AE. Of the 18 patients switched to the IS, and with a median follow-up of 5.2 months (range, 2.3-6.6) on IS, 3 developed grade 3 diarrhea on IS, 2 in the first cycle and 1 in the second cycle after the switch to IS, of whom 2 have been re-treated with IS for 1+ and 5+ months without recurrence of the AE. One patient was not evaluable for response due to discontinuation on Day 28 for personal reasons and 27/30 (90%) evaluable patients achieved an objective response. With a median follow-up of 9.4 months (range, 2.2-17.5) from enrollment, only 2/27 (7%) responders had disease progression (PD) on CS and were discontinued. Of the 18 patients who were switched to IS, only 1 SLL patient with a partial response (PR) achieved on CS developed PD on IS and was successfully rescued with switch back to CS. Another CLL patient in PR on CS had 10% increase in SPD from nadir in Cycle 5 on the IS and was switched back to CS. Group 2: 10/15 patients have completed 2 cycles of daily dosing at the time of analysis and were systematically switched to IS. With a median follow-up of 3.4 months (range, 1.5-5.7) on IS, only 1/10 patients developed delayed grade 3 diarrhea in the first cycle after switch to IS. 7/10 patients (70%) with FL/MZL achieved an objective response and no PD was reported with a median follow-up of 5.2 months (range, 3.1-7.5) from enrollment. Conclusions: Preliminary data suggest that switching to an intermittent schedule consisting of ME-401 administered on days 1-7 of a 28-day cycle following 2 cycles of continuous daily dosing was associated with a low rate of delayed grade 3 AEs and was associated with preservation of response in the vast majority of patients. All delayed grade 3 AEs of interest on IS occurred within 1-2 cycles of switching from CS to IS, suggesting that these might have represented a delayed effect of daily dosing. IS may also be a suitable re-treatment strategy in patients with delayed AEs on CS. Safety and efficacy data for the expansion cohort of 30 patients treated with ME-401 at 60 mg for 2 cycles then switched to IS will be presented at the meeting. A randomized study comparing CS and IS in FL is planned. Disclosures Zelenetz: Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Novartis/Sandoz: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding. Reddy:MEI Pharma: Research Funding. Stathis:Oncology Therapeutic Development: Research Funding. Ghalie:MEI Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership; Viracta Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pagel:Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Interim Analysis of a Phase 1 Study of the Antibody-Drug Conjugate SGN-CD19A in Relapsed or Refractory B-Lineage Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1741-1741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig H. Moskowitz ◽  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
Bijal D. Shah ◽  
Ranjana Advani ◽  
Paul Hamlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background CD19, a B-cell specific marker, is expressed in the majority of patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). SGN-CD19A is a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a humanized anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody conjugated to the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF) via a maleimidocaproyl linker. Methods This ongoing phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study investigates the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of SGN-CD19A in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL (NCT 01786135). Eligible patients are ≥12 years of age and must have a confirmed diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including transformed follicular histology; mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); follicular lymphoma grade 3 (FL3); Burkitt lymphoma; or B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. Patients must be relapsed or refractory to at least 1 prior systemic regimen. Patients with DLBCL or FL3 must have also received intensive salvage therapy with or without autologous stem cell transplant (SCT), unless they refused or were deemed ineligible. A modified continual reassessment method is used for dose allocation and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) estimation. SGN-CD19A is administered IV on Day 1 of 21-day cycles (0.5–6 mg/kg). Response is assessed with CT and PET scans according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Results To date, 44 patients have been treated: 39 patients (89%) with DLBCL (including 10 with transformed DLBCL), 4 (9%) with MCL, and 1 (2%) with FL3. Median age was 65 years (range, 33–81). Patients had a median of 2 prior systemic therapies (range, 1–7), and 10 patients (23%) had autologous SCT. Twenty-six patients (59%) were refractory to their most recent prior therapy, and 18 (41%) were relapsed. Patients received a median of 3 cycles of treatment (range, 1–12) at doses from 0.5–6 mg/kg. Eleven patients (25%) remain on treatment, and 33 have discontinued treatment (18 due to progressive disease [PD], 5 for investigator decision, 5 for adverse events [AE], 4 because of patient decision/non-AE, and 1 for SCT). No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in Cycle 1 has been reported. Treatment-emergent AEs reported in ≥20% of patients were blurred vision (59%), dry eye (39%), fatigue (39%), constipation (32%), keratopathy (23%), and pyrexia (20%). Corneal exam findings consistent with superficial microcystic keratopathy were observed in 25 patients (57%) and were mostly Grade 1/2. Grade 3/4 corneal AEs were observed in 4 patients at the higher doses; the majority resolved or improved to Grade 1/2 at last follow-up. Corneal AEs were treated with ophthalmic steroids, and during the trial steroid eye drop prophylaxis was instituted with each dose of study drug. SGN-CD19A ADC plasma exposures were approximately dose-proportional. Accumulation was observed following multiple dose administrations, consistent with a mean terminal half-life of about 2 weeks, suggesting less frequent dosing might be possible. In the 43 efficacy-evaluable patients, the objective response rate (ORR) is 30% (95% CI [17, 46]), including 7 complete responses (CRs; 16%) and 6 partial responses (PRs; 14%). Of the 13 patients with an objective response, 8 are still on study with follow-up times of 0.1–31 weeks; 2 are no longer on study; and 3 had subsequent PD or death with response durations of 14, 19, and 31 weeks. Table Best Clinical Response by Disease Status Relative to Most Recent Therapy, n (%) Relapsed N=17 Refractory N=26 Total N=43 CR 5 (29) 2 (8) 7 (16) PR 4 (24) 2 (8) 6(14) SD 4 (24) 9 (35) 13 (30) PD 4 (24) 13 (50) 17 (40) ORR (CR + PR), (95% CI) 53 (28, 77) 15 (4, 35) 30 (17, 46) Conclusions To date, SGN-CD19A has shown evidence of clinical activity with an ORR of 30% and CR rate of 16%. Enrollment in the trial is ongoing to further refine optimal dose and schedule. SGN-CD19A is generally well-tolerated. No DLTs have been observed in tested dose levels. Observed ocular AEs are manageable with steroid eye drops and dose modifications. The high response rate (53%) in relapsed patients and low rate of bone marrow suppression or neuropathy suggest that SGN-CD19A could be incorporated into novel combination regimens in earlier lines of therapy. Disclosures Moskowitz: Merck: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: SGN-CD19A is an investigational agent being studied in patients with B-cell malignancies. SGN-CD19A is not approved for use. . Forero-Torres:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Shah:Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; SWOG: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; NCCN: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Advani:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda International Pharmaceuticals Co.: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Travel expenses Other. Hamlin:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kim:Bayer: Consultancy; Eli Lily: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kostic:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sandalic:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhao:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fanale:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel expenses Other.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Chemotherapy or Chemo-Anti-PD-1 Combination after Unsatisfactory Response of Anti-PD-1 Therapy for Relapsed and Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Retrospective Series from Lysa Centers

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 652-652
Author(s):  
Cédric Rossi ◽  
Julia Gilhodes ◽  
Marie Maerevoet ◽  
Charles Herbaux ◽  
Pauline Brice ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Rate ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Introduction: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) pts who relapse after high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and brentuximab vedotin (BV) therapy have a poor outcome. For these relapsed and refractory (R/R) HL pts, anti-PD-1 therapy gives a high rate of objective responses. However, the rate of complete response (CR) remains modest and in the updated results of anti-PD-1 therapy clinical trials, about 50% of pts are still without progressive disease after one year of treatment. As anti-PD-1 therapy modifies the anticancer immune response, we hypothesize that anti-PD-1 therapy may increase sensitivity to chemotherapy (CT) given after anti-PD-1 therapy (sequential strategy) or in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy after an unsatisfactory response to immunotherapy (concomitant strategy). We retrospectively analyzed these two clinical situations in 30 R/R HL pts from LYSA centers treated with anti-PD-1 therapy. Methods: We included R/R HL pts from 14 LYSA centers who received anti-PD-1 therapy in the context of clinical trials (N=4) or an authorization for temporary use (ATU) from the French medical drug agency (N=26). Before the anti-PD-1 therapy, pts had received a median of six (range, 2-14) lines of therapy, 69% had HDT+ASCT, 14% had allograft and 93% had been treated with BV. We considered two groups of pts: i. 19 pts (63%) in whom the anti-PD-1 therapy was stopped at the introduction of CT (Group 1); ii. 11 pts (37%) with an unsatisfactory response to anti-PD-1 therapy in whom a combination of CT with immunotherapy was initiated to optimize the response (Group 2). The quality of the response after the introduction of CT was evaluated retrospectively by each treating physicians according to Cheson 2007 or 2014 criteria. We also determined whether new CT treatments after and in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy led to unexpected toxicities and whether new treatment schedules made pts eligible for allograft. Results: At the start of anti-PD-1, the median age of pts was 37 years old (range, 20-75), 24% had Ann Arbor III/IV stages, 34% had B symptoms and 21% had a performance status (PS) of 2-3. Patients received a median of 10 infusions (range, 2-52) of anti-PD-1 therapy with nivolumab (N=26, 87%) or pembrolizumab (N=4, 13%). The best responses achieved during anti-PD-1 therapy were a complete response (CR) for 5 patients, a partial response (PR) for 17 pts, stable disease (SD) for 2 pts and progression for 6 pts. In group 1, 17 pts were in progression, one pt in PR, and another pt in SD at the end of anti-PD-1 therapy alone. In group 1, after anti-PD-1 therapy, the pts were treated with vinblastine (N=3), gemcitabine (N=2) or bendamustine alone (N=3) or in combination with BV (N=4), GVD (N=1), ICE (N=1), DHAP (N=1), escalated BEACOPP (N=1), vinorelbine (N=1), vepeside (N=1) and caelyx (N=1). In group 2, before the combination, the response status was progression for 7 pts and PR for 4 pts. In group 2, to optimize the response to anti-PD-1, pts received vinblastine (N=7), gemcitabine (N=2) and BV (N=2). In the 28 evaluable pts, 11/18 (61%) in group 1 and 9/10 (90%) in group 2 showed an improved response after chemotherapy alone or combination with anti-PD-1 therapy respectively. In group 1, there were 6 CR (32%), 5 PR (26%), 1 SD (5%) and 6 PD (32%) (Figure 1B). In group 2, there were 5 CR (45%), 5 PR (45%) and 1 SD (10%) (Figure 1A). Of note, among the ten pts treated with vinblastine, 4 were in CR, 3 in RP, 1 in SD and 2 in progression. No unexpected toxicity was observed during the CT. Four pts had an allograft after the sequential CT (N=3) and concomitant CT strategy (N=1). Three pts were in CR 274, 279 and 480 days after the allograft and the fourth has not yet been evaluated. Allografts are now scheduled for 6 pts. With a median follow-up of 9.1 months (95%CI, 6.1-14) following the initiation of chemotherapy (alone or combined) the median PFS and OS were 8.4 and 14.6 months, respectively. Conclusions: Our retrospective study showed that pts with an unsatisfactory response or PD with anti-PD-1 therapy had a new objective response with CT alone (61%) or CT in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy (90%). This response could make some pts eligible for allograft. Prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm the synergistic effect of CT with anti-PD-1 therapy and to determine which CT provides the best results in combination with these checkpoint inhibitors. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ysebaert: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ghesquières: Celgene and Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Research Funding.

A Phase I Study of DCDT2980S, an Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) Targeting CD22, in Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 59-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranjana Advani ◽  
Daniel Lebovic ◽  
Mark Brunvand ◽  
Andy I. Chen ◽  
Andre Goy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

Abstract Abstract 59 Introduction: CD22 is a lineage marker expressed in most B-cell lymphomas. DCDT2980S is an ADC consisting of an anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), a potent microtubule disrupting agent linked to the antibody via a protease-cleavable peptide linker. DCDT2980S exhibits potent anti-tumor activity in murine xenograft models of B-cell lymphoma and is being evaluated in a Phase I study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and biologic activity in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory B-cell NHL. Methods: Pts receive DCDT2980S intravenously every 21 days at dose levels 0.1 to 3.2 mg/kg until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Intrapatient dose escalation based on tolerability at higher doses is permitted. Following determination of the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) based on protocol-defined dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring within 21 days of dosing, additional pts with indolent and aggressive B-cell NHL are being enrolled to further evaluate safety and efficacy based on Cheson response criteria. Here we report the RP2D and preliminary safety and efficacy results. Results: To date, 35 pts (57% male), median age 66 years (range 30–85) have been enrolled: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, n=18), follicular lymphoma (FL, n=11), transformed FL (n=4), and small lymphocytic lymphoma (n=2). Enrolled patients were heavily pre-treated: 26 pts had received ≥ 3 prior regimens, all pts had received prior rituximab, and 7 pts received prior high-dose therapy followed autologous or allogenic stem cell transplantation. Overall, pts received a median of 4 doses (range 1–25) of DCDT2980S in 7 dose-escalation cohorts, and 2 expansion cohorts at the RP2D. All 3 pts treated with DCDT2980S at 3.2 mg/kg developed Grade 4 neutropenia following the first dose, one of which constituted a DLT. No DLTs were reported in the 6 pts treated at 2.4 mg/kg, which is the RP2D. Across all dose levels, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AE) in ≥ 20% of pts were diarrhea (34%), fatigue (34%), nausea (31%), neutropenia (26%), decreased appetite (23%), vomiting (23%), and peripheral edema (20%). Treatment-emergent Grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported in 9 (27%) pts including 5 out of 9 pts who were treated at the RP2D of 2.4 mg/kg. Overall, neutropenia (24%) was the only Grade ≥ 3 AE in ≥ 10% of pts (24%) and was the only Grade ≥ 3 AE reported in > 1 pt (n=2) treated at the RP2D. Eight (26%) pts across all dose levels experienced a serious AE (SAE) of which one Grade 3 dehydration in a pt treated at 3.2 mg/kg was attributed to DCDT2980S. Treatment discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 3 pts: Grade 3 neutropenia (n=1) and Grade 3 peripheral sensory neuropathy (n=2). No deaths were reported within 30 days of the last dose of DCDT2980S. Assessment of Cycle 1 PK after the first dose of DCDT2980S indicated that the exposure of antibody-conjugated MMAE (acMMAE), total antibody, and free MMAE increased with dose. The clearance estimates of both acMMAE and total antibody were similar across doses from 1.0–3.2 mg/kg. The volume of distribution estimates for acMMAE and total antibody approximated plasma volume and did not change with dose and suggest dose-proportional increase of acMMAE and total antibody exposures for doses of 1.0–3.2 mg/kg. Early evidence of anti-tumor activity was observed. At the RP2D of 2.4 mg/kg, 2 of 3 pts with DLBCL had > 75% reduction in tumor sum of perpendicular dimensions (SPD) and negative PET scans; 1 partial response was noted in a pt with FL treated at 1.8 mg/kg. These 3 pts continue on study, each having received at least 8 cycles of study treatment. Two additional pts with DLBCL receiving 0.5 mg/kg and 3.2–2.4 mg/kg had > 50% reduction in tumor SPD and discontinued study treatment after 8 and 6 cycles, respectively, to undergo stem cell transplant. Conclusions: In this early experience, DCDT2980S is well tolerated, has a favorable safety profile and has evidence of anti-tumor activity in in a heavily pretreated pts with relapsed/refractory B-cell NHL. Updated clinical data will be presented. These results support additional clinical evaluation of DCDT2980S in B-cell malignancies. Disclosures: Advani: Genentech: Research Funding. Off Label Use: anti-CD79b Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) DCDS4501A. Lebovic:Genentech: Speakers Bureau. Brunvand:Genentech: Speakers Bureau. Chen:Genentech: Research Funding. Chang:Genentech: Research Funding. Ho:Genentech: Employment. Kahn:Genentech: Employment. Lu:Genentech: Employment. Su:Genentech: Employment. Chu:Genentech: Employment.

Comparison of intermittent versus continuous methotrexate plus 6-mp in maintenance regimen for standard risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children (GBTLI ALL-99)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9512-9512 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. R. Brandalise
Keyword(s):  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Treatment Schedule ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Standard Risk ◽  
Group 1

9512 Objectives: To compare by randomization the conventional use of 6-MP (50 mg/m2 daily) / MTX (25 mg/m2/wk) regimen with the intermittent use of MTX (200 mg/m2/IV 6 h infusion each 21 days)/ 6-MP (100 mg/m2/day × 10) in maintenance therapy. Methods: Newly diagnosed ALL children up to 18 yrs of age registered in the GBTLI ALL-99 Protocol. The eligibility criteria for standard-risk group were age >1 <9 years and WBC count at diagnosis <50,000/mm3 and good responders at D7/D14. Randomization was made after the late consolidation phase (week 42) prior to the maintenance treatment. Treatment Schedule: Induction: [DX(Pred), DNM, VCR, L-ASP, CICLO, Ara-C, 6-MP], Intensification: (MTX 2 g/m2 6 h inf. × 4, 6-MP) Late Consolidation: (DX, VCR, DOXO, L-ASP, CICLO, ARA-C, 6-TG) plus prolonged triple intratecal therapy, were done previously to maintenance therapy. Total treatment duration was two years. No CNS radiation was done. Toxicities were defined according to NCI-version 2001 criteria. Results: 560 pts were enrolled in the study. 22 slow responders pts (4.1%) moved to high risk group. The total number of analyzed pts was 512. Two hundred and thirty pts entered group 1 [continuous (conventional) 6MP-MTX] and 230 pts entered group 2 (Intermittent MTX/6-MP). Remission rate was 95.3%. 439 pts (87.9%) are in CCR. The mean follow up period is 2.2 years. The estimated 5 years OS rate for both groups is 88.1% ± 2.1%. The estimated 5 years EFS for both groups is 80% ± 2.9%. According to maintenance regimen, the 5 years EFS rate is 80.2% ± 4.5% and 88.3% ± 3.7% for group 1 and group 2, respectively (p=0.048). Grade 3 and 4 hepatic toxicities were 254 episodes for group 1 and 144 episodes for group 2 (p=0.019). Grade 3 CNS toxicities were 13 episodes (group 1) and 5 in group 2. Grade 4 hematological toxicities were 254 episodes for group 1 and 144 episodes for group 2 (p=0.003). Conclusions: Despite the short mean time follow-up (2.2 years) the patients with the intermittent regimen (Group 2) had better EFS rate (p = 0.048) and less hematological, CNS and hepatic toxicities, comparing with patients that received conventional maintenance treatment (group 1). No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Carboplatin, ifosfamide, and mesna (CIM) for the treatment of gynecological carcinosarcoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16539-e16539
Author(s):  
N. Walji ◽  
A. Zachariah ◽  
C. Yap ◽  
S. A. Hussain ◽  
C. J. Poole ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complete Response ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
The Common ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Abdominal Irradiation ◽  
Toxicity Criteria ◽  
Group 1

e16539 Background: A GOG trial comparing cisplatin/ifosfamide/mesna chemotherapy versus whole abdominal irradiation for FIGO stages I-IV carcinosarcoma (CS) showed an estimated median survival (MS) of 50 months for chemotherapy but high toxicity. This study investigates the efficacy and tolerability of a novel regimen using carboplatin AUC 5, ifosfamide 3 g/m2 and mesna 1 g/m2 (CIM) in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting. Methods: Retrospective analysis of women with CS treated from May 1997-May 2007 with CIM (group 1) versus other chemotherapy regimens (group 2). Toxicity was graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria and MS estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 51 eligible women (median age 71 years) 35 (69%) had stage 3 or 4 disease. 35/51 (69%) received chemotherapy; 2 with stage 1c disease received pelvic radiotherapy (pRT) alone whilst the remaining 14 were unfit for any treatment. Median follow-up for the treated patients is 45 months. 11/35 patients (31%) received CIM as first-line chemotherapy. Other regimens included: carboplatin (n = 14); carboplatin/paclitaxel (n = 3); carboplatin/epirubicin (n = 3); carboplatin/doxorubicin (n = 2); doxorubicin/ifosfamide (n = 1); cisplatin/ifosfamide (n = 1). 20/35 (57%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) of which 8 received CIM; 11/20 patients also received adjuvant pRT. MS in the CIM AC group is 54.7 months compared to 37.4 months for other regimens. 3/8 patients (37.5%) in the CIM arm developed recurrent disease compared to 9/12 (75%) for other regimens. 4/16 patients received CIM as first- or second-line palliative chemotherapy. All patients responded of whom 2 achieved clinical and radiological complete response (CR). One woman subsequently relapsed and achieved a second CR with CIM. MS for all chemotherapy-treated patients is 54.7 months (group 1) versus 20.6 months (group 2) (p = 0.07). No patients in group 1 experienced any grade 3/4 toxicity and all patients completed the prescribed treatment. There were 2 unexpected treatment-related deaths in group 2, one of whom received carboplatin/paclitaxel and the other carboplatin/epirubicin. Conclusions: CIM appears to be efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of CS and merits further investigation in clinical trials. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Non-Effectiveness of Using RICE Post RDHAP or RDHAP Post RICE after Failure of First Line Salvage Therapy in DLBCL Patients Who Are Eligible for ASCT

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4226-4226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Ibrahim ◽  
Tarek Assi ◽  
Julien Lazarovici ◽  
Maxime Annereau ◽  
David Ghez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Salvage Regimen ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background: The treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains challenging. The use of salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in young and fit patients is considered the standard of care. RDHAP (rituximab, dexamethasone, high dose cytosine arabinoside and cisplatin) and RICE (rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide) are the two most commonly used salvage-regimens with comparable efficacy (CORAL study). However, nearly 40% of the patients do no respond to these regimens and subsequently they do not proceed to ASCT. There are no guidelines concerning the choice of a second-line salvage regimen. There are sparse data in the literature concerning the best choice if the first salvage regimen fails. The aim of our study was to investigate the potential role of a second salvage regimen, before intensification, by RICE or RDHAP in patients with DLBCL refractory to the first line salvage therapy by RDHAP or RICE, respectively. Methods: We retrospectively included all patients aged 18 years and above who had a relapsed or refractory DLBCL and who were eligible for an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) between the years 2008 and 2017. They should have had progressive or stable disease (PD/SD) following first-line salvage based on RICE (group 1) or RDHAP (group 2) and should have received a second-line salvage based on RDHAP or RICE, respectively. Patients who received carboplatin or oxaliplatin instead of cisplatin in the RDHAP protocol were also included. All cases were discussed at a tumor board and the revised International Working Group response criteria for Malignant lymphoma were used to assess the response to chemotherapy. Information were collected using electronic medical record. Ethics committee approval was not necessary. Results: 100 patients' medical files were reviewed, out of which 69 were excluded for the following reasons: 5 patients lacked necessary information; 13 patients were treated for a non-DLBCL; 30 patients could not receive second line salvage therapy because of deterioration of their performance status; 21 patients because they received a bridging therapy (other than RICE or RDHAP) before second line salvage therapy. The study included 31 patients with 19 (61.3%) males and 12 (38.7%) females. The median age was equal to 59 years (standard deviation 14). DLBCL was at the initial diagnosis in all but 6 patients in whom DLBCL developed after an indolent lymphoma (follicular lymphoma in 4 and marginal zone lymphoma in 2). 70% had germinal centre B-cell subtype, while 30% had activated B-cell subtype. 70% were refractory to the primary therapy (CR not attained on primary therapy or relapsed within 6 months) and 30% recurred after a CR lasting more than 6 months. All patients included in group 1 (n=5) have received cisplatin during the treatment with the RDHAP regimen. Among the 26 patients included in the second group, 19 (73.1%) have received cisplatin, 4 (15.4%) oxaliplatin, and 3 (11.5%) carboplatin in first line salvage. No patient in group 1 responded to RICE and eventually no patient proceeded to ASCT. In the second group, 2 patients (7.7%) deceased after the first cycle of RDHAP because of drug related toxicities (1 due to ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy and 1 due to septic choc following febrile neutropenia). Ten patients (38.5%) responded to RDHAP, in whom an ASCT was planned. However, 2 patients could not proceed to ASCT because of peripheral stem cell collection failure. After a median follow up of 8.7 months, the median progression free survival (PFS) of the 8 patients who proceeded to ASCT was 6.3 months (CI 95% 2.6-10.1). Only 1 patient had a tumor response lasting more than 30 months. No factor was found to be associated with PFS on cox regression analysis (which included age, sex, type of DLBCL, and refractory or recurrent status). Conclusion: There is little information regarding the effectiveness of a second-line salvage therapy in patients not responding to first line intensification. All except one patient either could not proceed to ASCT or had a limited response (less than 3 months) post ASCT. In addition, the toxicity was not negligible considering that 2 patients died because of drug related events. This study suggests that patients with DLBCL who failed to respond to first line salvage by RDHAP or RICE should be considered for investigational therapies rather than second line rescue. Disclosures Ribrag: pharmamar: Other: travel; MSD: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel; Roche: Honoraria, Other: travel; Amgen: Research Funding; argenX: Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; NanoString Technologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Infinity: Consultancy, Honoraria; epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Prognostic Significance of Baseline FLT3-ITD Mutant Allele Burden in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Intensive Chemotherapy with/without Sorafenib

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3983-3983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fevzi Yalniz ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Tapan M. Kadia ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Keyur Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Mutant Allele ◽  
Optimal Cutoff ◽  
Allele Burden ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Allelic Burden ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background Internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutation of the FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) receptor gene occurs in about 25% patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and confers a poor prognosis. Several studies have reported that a higher mutant allelic burden is associated with a worse prognosis. Methods Adult patients with FLT3-ITD mutated AML treated at our institution from January 2001 to January 2018, who had quantified FLT3-ITD allele burden, were identified. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia and core-binding factor AML were excluded.Patients were assigned into 2 groups; Group 1 included patients who received idarubicin and cytarabine (IA) containing induction and Group 2 included patients who received sorafenib in addition to IA containing regimens at induction. Mutant allelic burden was expressed as the ratio of area under the peak of mutant allele to total FLT3. Relapse free survival (RFS) for patients achieving complete response (CR)/CR with incomplete recovery (CRi) was defined as time from CR/CRi to relapse or death. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from treatment to death. Patients were censored at last follow up. Time from therapy to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (AlloHCT) was handled as a time-dependent variable. The optimal cutoff of mutant FLT3-ITD allelic burden was defined as the cutoff to divide the whole cohort with the highest statistical significance. Results A total of 183 patients withFLT3-ITD mutated AML were identified including 104 (57%) in Group 1 and 79 (43%) in Group 2. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median age was 52 years (range, 17-64). The median allelic burden of mutant was 33% (range, 0.3% to 88%). This was comparable between the two groups (p=0.6). The CR/CRi rates following induction for Group 1 vs Group 2 were 85% vs 99%, respectively (p=0.004). Overall, 111 (61%) patients received an AlloHCT, at any time during the follow up, more frequently in Group 2 than in Group 1 (67% vs 56%, respectively, p=0.1). The median RFS for Group 1 and 2 were 12 and 45 months, respectively (p=0.02); the median OS was 17 months in Group 1 and has not been reached in Group 2 (p=0.008) (Table 2). The optimal mutant allele burden cutoff for OS and RFS in the entire cohort was 1.55% (p=0.002) confirming the adverse effect of FLT3-ITD even at low level. The cutoff was 6.9% in Group 1, with no optimal cutoff value in Group 2 (Figure 1) confirming the value of sorafenib inFLT3-ITD mutated AML. When censored for AlloHCT; the FLT3-ITD cutoff for OS and RFS was 60% and 60% in the entire group. For Group 1 the cutoff values where 59% and 7.9% for OS and RFS, respectively. For Group 2 the cutoff values were 46% and 46%, respectively (Figure 2). On multivariate analysis, AlloHCT (HR 0.52; 95%CI 0.33-0.82; p=0.005), sorafenib (HR 0.6; 95%CI 0.38-0.93; p=0.02) and white blood cell count (HR 1.005; 95%CI 1.002-1.009) were independent predictors of OS with no impact by cytogenetics, concurrent NPM1, TP53, FLT3-D835 mutations or the FLT3-ITD allelic burden. Conclusion Although a higher FLT3-ITD allele burden is associated with a worse RFS and OS in patients with FLT3-ITD mutated AML treated with IA-based chemotherapy, it is no longer prognostic when sorafenib is added to the therapeutic regimen. Addition of sorafenib to intensive chemotherapy as well as AlloHSCT are associated with a significant improvement in OS on multivariate analysis. Disclosures Kadia: Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy. Sasaki:Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria. Daver:BMS: Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Sunesis: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; ARIAD: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy; Kiromic: Research Funding. DiNardo:Medimmune: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Honoraria. Pemmaraju:Affymetrix: Research Funding; SagerStrong Foundation: Research Funding; plexxikon: Research Funding; daiichi sankyo: Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; abbvie: Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding. Short:Takeda Oncology: Consultancy. Bose:Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc.: Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Cortes:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ravandi:Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Sunesis: Honoraria; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Honoraria; Orsenix: Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Orsenix: Honoraria; Abbvie: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals EZH2 Upregulation Is Associated with Unfavorable Prognosis in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma through Potential RUNX3 Downregulation

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5301-5301
Author(s):  
Denise Peker ◽  
Samara Roman-Holba ◽  
Yuri Kwon ◽  
Jennifer Gordetsky ◽  
Amitkumar Mehta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Rna Expression ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Large B Cell ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Introduction: The runt-related transcription factor 3 (RUNX3) is a downstream effector of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling pathway, and has critical roles in apoptosis, angiogenesis, cell migration and invasion. Putative tumor suppressor activity of RUNX3 has been presented extensively in the literature, particularly in solid epithelial tumors and recently in lymphoma with loss of expression favoring tumorigenesis and/or prognosis, but its role in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has not been studied. Enhancer of zeste homolog-2 (EZH2), a histone methyltransferase, has been shown to mediate silencing of RUNX3. RUNX3 downregulation due to EZH2 upregulation has been shown in various solid tumors. In the present study, we investigated the EZH2 and RUNX3 RNA expression status in DLBCL and its impact on clinical outcome. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed and 169 cases of DLBCL treated with chemoimmunotherapy between 2003 and 2013 were included. Immunodeficiency- or EBV-associated and MYC+ LBCL were excluded. Archived formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded tissue samples were retrieved and RNA was extracted using commercially available kits. We correlated the RNA expression levels for EZH2 and RUNX3 in various sites using quantitative real-time PCR (Taqman assay) and custom designed primers for each gene. Control samples included three benign lymph nodes free of a neoplastic process. Results: We identified 66 cases of DLBCL, including25 nodal DLBCL and 41 extranodal DLBCL, with sufficient RNA extracted. Extranodal locations included testis (n=12), orbit (n=6), primary central nervous system (n=5), bone (n=3), breast (n=2) and viscera (n=13). The median age was 64 years (range 29- 81 years) with a female to male ratio of 0.4 (F=20 and M=46). Median overall survival (OS) was 28 months (1-156 months). Immunophenotypic subtype based on cell-of-origin using Hans algorithm was available in 63 cases; 34 cases were germinal center B-cell (GCB) type while 29 were non-GCB type. Treatment data was available in 63 cases and all patients received R-CHOP as initial therapy except three patients who died shortly after diagnosis. Forty-four cases showed higher expression of EZH2 and RUNX3 when compared to normal lymph nodes (p < 0.05). Nineteen out of 44 cases showed increased EZH2 and decreased RUNX3 expression (Group 1) while EZH2 expression was lower than RUNX3 in the remaining cases (Group 2). The remaining 22 DLBCL cases did not show significant correlation for expression (Group 3). Overall survival was significantly low in Group 1 compared to Group 2 and Group 3 (p =0.030 and p=0.026, respectively). There was no difference for OS between Groups 2 and 3 (p>0.05) (Figure 1). Conclusions: Our results showed that decreased RUNX3 RNA expression is associated with EZH2 overexpression and poses an adverse prognostic factor in DLBCL. Larger studies are needed to establish the prognostic and therapeutic utility of EZH2 and/or RUNX3. Disclosures Mehta: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Roche Genentech: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Forero:University of Alabama at Birmingham: Research Funding. Costa:Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Mature Follow up from a Phase 2 Study of PI3K-Delta Inhibitor Idelalisib in Patients with Double (Rituximab and Alkylating agent)-Refractory Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (iNHL)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1708-1708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay K. Gopal ◽  
Brad S. Kahl ◽  
Sven de Vos ◽  
Nina D. Wagner-Johnston ◽  
Stephen J. Schuster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Systemic Therapies

Abstract Introduction: Rituximab-alkylator combinations are the standard therapies for patients (pts) with iNHL, however, refractory disease nearly uniformly develops. Once iNHL becomes “double-refractory” to both rituximab + alkylating agents, there are limited options to induce durable remissions. PI3K-delta signaling is critical for activation, proliferation and survival of B cells, and is hyperactive in many B-cell malignancies. Idelalisib, a selective oral inhibitor of PI3Kd, demonstrated considerable clinical activity in double-refractory iNHL (Gopal NEJM 2014). FDA granted accelerated approval for Idelalisib (Zydelig®) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies with relapsed FL or SLL. Based on these encouraging initial results, we now describe long-term follow up, safety, and remission durations of this double-refractory iNHL population treated with idelalisib. Methods: Eligible iNHL pts included those with measurable disease refractory to both rituximab and an alkylating agent. Refractory was defined as lack of response to, or progression of lymphoma within 6 months of completion of index therapy, confirmed by imaging. Idelalisib 150 mg PO BID was administered continuously until disease progression or intolerance. Responses were evaluated by an independent review committee, using standard criteria (Cheson, 2007, and Owen 2013). The new data cutoff date for this analysis was June 2014, 20 months after the last patient enrolled. Results: Enrolled pts (N = 125) had a median age of 64 years and included follicular lymphoma (FL) n=72 (58%), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) n=28 (22%), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) n=15 (12%) and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL)/Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) n=10 (8%). The median number of prior therapies was 4 [range 2-12], including bendamustine/rituximab (BR) (n=60) and rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) (n=56) and autologous transplant (n=14). 81 pts (65%) had prior bendamustine, of which 61/81 (75%) were refractory. 112 pts (90%) were refractory to their last regimen, and 99 pts (79%) were refractory to ≥2 regimens. 38 pts (30%) had elevated LDH, and 33 pts (26%) had bulky disease >7 cm. The median time to progression from last prior therapy was 3.9 months. With a median exposure of 11.1 months (range 0.7 to 35.4), the overall response rate (ORR) is 56% (95% CI = 46.8-64.9) with 70 responders, comprising 12 CRs (9.6%), 58 PRs (46.4%). The median time to response was 1.9 months (time of first evaluation) and time to CR was 4.5 months. There were 43 pts with stable disease (SD) (34.4%). 90% of pts experienced some decrease in tumor burden. ORR for iNHL subtypes is: FL (54%), SLL (61%), MZL (47%), and LPL/WM (70%). CR rate for iNHL subtypes is: FL (14%), SLL (4%), MZL (7%), and LPL/WM (0%). Among responders, median DOR is 13.9 (0.03-31.3) months. DOR for iNHL subtypes in months (Figure 1) is: FL 11.8, SLL 13.9, MZL 18.4, and LPL/WM (not yet reached). Median PFS for all pts is 11.0 months, in comparison to a median PFS of the last prior regimen of 3.9 months (p<.0001). The median PFS for individual subtypes in months was: FL 11.0, SLL11.1, MZL 6.6, and LPL/WM 22.2. The median overall survival of all patients was 30.8 months. The adverse events include (total%/≥ grade 3%) diarrhea/colitis (50/18), fatigue (30/2), nausea (31/2), cough (32/0), pyrexia (30/2), dyspnea (18/5), rash (14/2), pneumonia (14/11), and pneumonitis (4/3). Based on central laboratory measurements, Grade ≥3 ALT/AST elevations occurred in 18 pts (14%). Drug was temporarily held in these pts, and 11/15 pts (73%) were re-treated without recurrence of ALT/AST elevation. Overall, 30 pts (24%) have discontinued therapy due to adverse events. Conclusions: The prolonged administration of idelalisib was well tolerated, had an acceptable safety profile, and was highly effective in inducing and maintaining remissions in double-refractory iNHL population with an ORR of 56%, PFS of 11 months, and DOR of 13.9 months. The response rate and long term duration of responses in the small number of subjects with LPL/WM is very promising, and will be evaluated in larger trials of this disease. The observed disease control compared to prior regimens suggests the potential for prolonged clinical benefit in this challenging patient population with unmet medical need. Figure 1: Duration of Response by Disease Group. Figure 1:. Duration of Response by Disease Group. Disclosures Gopal: Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Zydelig is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with: 1) Relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), in combination with rituximab, in patients for whom rituximab alone would be considered appropriate therapy due to other co-morbidities; 2) Relapsed follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (FL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies; and 3) Relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.. Kahl:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. de Vos:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Wagner-Johnston:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Schuster:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Jurczak:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Flinn:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Flowers:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Martin:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Viardot:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Blum:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Goy:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Davies:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Zinzani:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Dreyling:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Holes:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sorensen:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Godfrey:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Salles:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Tolerance and Effectiveness of Targeted Therapies in Aged Patients with Metastatic Melanoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ondine Becquart ◽  
Bastien Oriano ◽  
Stéphane Dalle ◽  
Laurent Mortier ◽  
Marie Thérèse Leccia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Elderly People ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Aged Patients ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Purpose: Melanoma&rsquo;s incidence is increasing, and elderly people could be significantly impacted since the majority occurs in people over 65 years of age. Combined targeted therapies (TT) are current standard regimen for BRAF mutated metastatic melanoma (MM). Except for subgroups of pivotal trials, little data are available for TT in this population. Materials and Methods: Outcomes were explored in real life patients from MelBase, a French multicentric biobank dedicated to the prospective follow-up of unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. Patients treated by BRAF TT and/or MEK TT combined or not, were included from 2013 to 2017 in 2 groups: group 1 &lt;65-year-old (yo), group 2 &gt;65 yo, analyzed for tolerance and efficacy. Results: 353 patients were included: 231 in group 1, 122 in group 2. Median follow-up was 12 months (M). Median time of treatment was 6.9 M. A total of 80% had at least one Adverse Effect (AE). Most frequent AE (all grades) were mainly skin and subcutaneous, general, and gastrointestinal disorders. A total of 31% of AE were grade 3&ndash;4: 28% in group 1 and 39% in group 2 (p = 0.05). No differences were observed in all AE grades proportion, dose modifications, interruptions, and discontinuations. For each group, median overall survival was 20.3 M (CI 95%: 15.5&ndash;27.9) and 16.3 M (CI: 14.5&ndash;26.9), respectively (p = 0.8). Median progression free survival was 7.8 M (6.4&ndash;9.9) and 7.7 M (CI: 5.8&ndash;11.3) (p = 0.4). Objective response rate was 59% and 50% (p = 0.6). Conclusion: This study on a large multicentric cohort is the first to assess that TT is well tolerated in elderly BRAF-mutated patients such as in patients younger than 65. Efficacy was similar between groups with outcomes reaching those from pivotal studies. There is thus no argument against using TT in elderly people, although an onco-geriatric opinion is welcome for the most vulnerable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document