Canadian Retrospective Multicentric Study Comparing the Combination of Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (Cybord) Versus Bortezomib, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone (VTD) Versus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (Vd) in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Eligible for Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HCT)

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic cancer. The management of this disease consists of induction therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). There is no standard of care as for the best induction regime. Recently, the first phase III study (Moreau P and all.) comparing two chemotherapy triplets in transplant-eligible patients, suggested a superiority of VTD over VCD. Although VTD was associated with better treatment response rates, the survival data remains to be seen. We wanted to retrospectively compare 3 Bortezomib-based therapies using response rates (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Bortezomib-Cyclophosphamide-Dexamethasone (CyBorD) remains the standard in Canada. Method: A total of 75 patients induced between 2010 and 2016 were analyzed. Their charts were reviewed and the data was retrospectively collected. Three distinct treatment groups were included : Vd (19), CyBorD (39) and VTD (17).The main outcome was treatment response rate, 2-year progression-free survival rate (PFS) and 2-year overall survival rate (OS). The secondary outcome was median PFS. Results: Patient characteristics are presented below (table 1). The difference between the treatment response rates were non-statistically significant but demonstrated a favorable trend towards VTD as the VGPR rate was 58.8%, 65% and 88.1% respectively in the Vd, CyBoRD and VTD groups (table 2 and 3). Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the group that received VTD than in the group that received CyBord (3.58 years vs. 2,80 years; P = 0.03). The 2-year overall survival rate was 88,9%, 96,3% et 93,3% respectively in the 3 groups (table 4). Conclusion: The data from this retrospective study supports the superiority of the VTD induction regimen compared with CyBorD and Vd in terms of response rate and progression-free survival. However, there is no major difference in overall survival over the time period observed. Disclosures Leblanc: Amgen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Boudreault:Celgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Tandem Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplants (AuHCT) with or without Maintenance Therapy (auto-auto) Versus Single AuHCT Followed by HLA Matched Sibling Non- Myeloablative Allogeneic HCT (auto-allo) for Patients with Standard Risk (SR) Multiple Myeloma (MM): Results From the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) 0102 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.41.41 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 41-41 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Amrita Krishnan ◽

Marcelo C Pasquini ◽

Marian Ewell ◽

Edward A. Stadtmauer ◽

Edwin P Alyea ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Response Rates ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Allogeneic Hct ◽

Matched Sibling

Abstract Abstract 41 AuHCT improves survival in patients with MM, but disease relapse and progression remain a challenge. Both tandem AuHCT and post transplant maintenance therapy improve progression-free survival (PFS). Alternatively, allogeneic HCT has the potential to reduce disease progression through a graft-versus-myeloma effect. Use of nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens allows the latter approach to be used with reduced treatment-related mortality (TRM). BMT CTN 0102 was a multicenter phase III trial that biologically assigned patients with MM to auto-auto using melphalan 200mg/m2 (MEL 200) conditioning or an auto-allo approach using MEL 200 followed by alloHCT with 2 Gy total body irradiation. Graft-versus-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. The primary endpoint was 3-year progression free survival (PFS). Between December 2003 and March 2007, 710 patients from 43 US centers were enrolled. Patients were assigned to the auto-allo arm based on availability of an HLA-matched sibling donor at time of enrollment. Patients in the auto-auto arm were further randomized to thalidomide and dexamethasone (Thal-Dex) for 1 year or observation (obs). Among 625 patients with SR MM (absence of chromosome 13 deletion by metaphase karyotyping and β-2 microglobulin ≤ 4mg/L), 436 were assigned to auto-auto (217 Thal-Dex, 219 obs) and 189 to auto-allo. Compliance with Thal-Dex was poor, with 84% of patients not completing prescribed therapy. PFS and overall survival (OS) between the Thal-Dex and obs cohorts were equal and these arms were pooled for the primary analysis. The auto-auto and auto-allo groups differed in age (median 55y vs. 52y, p =0.01) and time between first and second transplants (median 98d vs 105d, p =0.02), but were otherwise balanced. Complete and near complete (CR+nCR) response rates at study entry were 24% for both groups. Three-year PFS was 46% and 43% (p=0.67) and 3-year OS was 80% and 77 % (p=0.19) for the auto-auto and auto-allo groups, respectively. Corresponding probabilities for 3-year progression/relapse were 50% and 46% (p=0.8) and for 3-year TRM were 4% and 11% (p=0.04). Among auto-allo patients, probabilities of grade III-IV acute and chronic GVHD were 9% and 47%, respectively. Eighty-two percent of patients in each arm received the assigned second transplant. Among 522 patients who received their second transplant, 3-year PFS was 47% and 44% (p=0.89) with auto-auto and auto-allo, respectively. Disease response rates at day 56 after second HCT were: 50% very good partial response (VGPR) or better and 40% CR+nCR in the auto-auto group; and 49% (VGPR or better, p=0.8) and 48% (CR+nCR,p=0.12) in the auto-allo group. In conclusion, there were no differences in 3-year PFS and OS between patients receiving auto-auto or auto-allo. Potential benefits of graft-versus-myeloma to reduce disease progression or relapse were offset by increased TRM. Thal-Dex maintenance did not improve PFS or OS, likely due to poor tolerability of this regimen. At 3 years, the auto-allo approach for SR MM had no added benefit compared to tandem AuHCT. Disclosures: Krishnan: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Stadtmauer:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Comenzo:Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Elan Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Genzyme: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Ortho: Research Funding. Hari:Celgene: Research Funding. Qazilbash:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Vesole:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Giralt:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Melflufen, a Peptidase Targeted Therapy, and Dexamethasone in an Ongoing Open-Label Phase 2a Study in Patients with Relapsed and Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Including an Initial Report on Progression Free Survival

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3029.3029 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3029-3029

Author(s):

Peter M. Voorhees ◽

Valeria Magarotto ◽

Pieter Sonneveld ◽

Torben Plesner ◽

Ulf-Henrik Mellqvist ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Study Drug ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Background: Melflufen is a highly potent anti-angiogenic compound that triggers rapid, robust and irreversible DNA damage and exerts its cytotoxicity through alkylation of DNA. The lipophilicity of melflufen leads to rapid and extensive distribution into tissues and cells where it binds directly to DNA or is readily metabolized by intracellular peptidases into hydrophilic alkylating metabolites. With targeted delivery of alkylating metabolites to tumor cells in vitro (such as multiple myeloma that are rich in activating peptidase), melflufen exerts a 20-100 fold higher anti-tumor potency and produces a 20 fold higher intracellular concentration of alkylating moieties compared with melphalan. Methods: Melflufen is evaluated in combination with dexamethasone (dex) 40 mg weekly in an ongoing Phase 1/2a study. RRMM patients with measurable disease and at least 2 prior lines of therapy are eligible (NCT01897714). Phase 1 established the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of melflufen to be 40 mg every 3 weeks in combination with low dose dex. The primary objective of Phase 2a is the overall response rate and safety of the MTD in a total of 55 patients. Response was investigator assessed at the end of each cycle by IMWG criteria. Here we present the Phase 2 data as of 14 July 2015 data-cut. Results: Thirty-one patients were dosed at the MTD. The median time from initial diagnosis to first dose of melflufen was 6 years (1-15). The median number of prior therapies was 4 (2-9). 97% of patients were exposed to immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), 90% to proteasome inhibitors (PIs), 77% to melphalan, and 71% had received prior autologous stem cell transplant. 58% were double refractory (IMiDs and PIs) and 42% were triple refractory (IMiDs, PIs and alkylators). In total, 121 doses of melflufen have been given (1-11 cycles). Median treatment duration was 13 weeks with 9 patients still ongoing. One patient completed therapy as planned, 15 patients discontinued due to AEs (48%) and 6 due to progression (19%). Twenty-three patients were evaluable for response (protocol defined as ≥2 doses of melflufen with baseline and follow-up response assessments). One patient achieved a very good partial response and 10 patients achieved partial response (PR) (1 unconfirmed, still ongoing) for an overall response rate (ORR) of 48%. Three additional patients achieved minimal response (MR) for a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 61%. Time to clinical benefit and response was rapid with 93% of patients achieving ≥ MR after 1-3 cycles and 64% achieving PR after only 1-3 cycles. Eight patients maintained stable disease and 1 patient had early progressive disease. Similar ORRs were seen in PI-refractory (43%), IMiD-refractory (40%), alkylator-refractory (62%), double-refractory (38%) and triple-refractory (50%) patients. The median progression free survival (PFS) is currently at 7.6 months (95% confidence interval: 3.4 - ∞) based on 14 events in 30 patients. The most frequent adverse events (AE), all grades, occurring in >10% of patients, regardless of relationship to study drug were thrombocytopenia (94%), anemia (84%), neutropenia (61%), leukopenia (42%), pyrexia (36%), asthenia (32%), fatigue and nausea (26%), bone pain (19%), cough, diarrhea, dyspnea, mucosal inflammation and upper respiratory infection (16%) and constipation and epistaxis (13%). Treatment-related Grade 3 or 4 AEs were reported in 27 patients (87%). Those occurring in >5% of patients were thrombocytopenia (68%), neutropenia (55%), anemia (42%), leukopenia (32%) and febrile neutropenia, fatigue, pyrexia, asthenia and hyperglycemia each occurred in 6% of patients. Serious AEs occurred in 9 patients (29%), but were only assessed as related to study drug in 5 patients (16%) including 3 febrile neutropenia, 1 fever and 1 pneumonia. Cycle length has recently been increased to 28 days to improve tolerability with respect to hematologic toxicity. Conclusion: Melflufen has promising activity in heavily pretreated RRMM patients where conventional therapies have failed. The current ORR is 48% and CBR is 61%. Similar results were seen across patient populations regardless of refractory status. The median PFS is encouraging at 7.6 months. Hematologic toxicity was common, but non-hematologic AEs were infrequent. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Voorhees: Millennium/Takeda and Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Array BioPharma, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, and Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Janssen, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline,Onyx Pharmaceuticals and Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sonneveld:Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene and Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Plesner:Roche and Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen and Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mellqvist:Celgene, Amgen, Mundipharma and Novartis: Honoraria. Byrne:Oncopeptides: Consultancy. Harmenberg:Oncopeptides: Consultancy. Nordstrom:Oncopeptides: Employment. Palumbo:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array BioPharma: Honoraria; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria. Richardson:Oncopeptides, Celgene and Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival Among a Patient Cohort of Relapsed/Refractory Mycosis Fungoides in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126246 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5879-5879

Author(s):

Martine Bagot ◽

Timothy Illidge ◽

Nicola Pimpinelli ◽

Mehul Dalal ◽

Athanasios Zomas ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Mycosis Fungoides ◽

Systemic Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Index Date ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

High Rate ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival

Background and Aim: Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common subtype of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) wherein those with advanced stage have a poor prognosis. The objective of this study was to describe clinical characteristics and survival in MF patients who were refractory or had relapsed after a first systemic therapy. Methods: A retrospective chart review study was conducted at 27 sites in Europe. Patients enrolled had a diagnosis of MF and proved to be relapsed/refractory (R/R) prior to 1-Jan-2016 after a first systemic therapy. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated from the date of R/R event (defined as the index date) using Kaplan-Meier estimates. PFS was defined as death, progression, second relapse or refractory, or presence of subsequent treatment after index date. Results: This study included 104 advanced R/R MF patients with a median age of 54.5 years (range: 21-82). The median follow-up was 3.5 years (range: 0-20.7) after index date. In total 80% of patients experienced a second R/R, with a median time to second R/R of 15.8 months (range: 0.6-174.6). The median age at death was 65 years (range: 42-85). In total 39 deaths (37.5%) were observed. Among those patients who had a known cause of death (N=35), 18 died of CTCL progression, 11 of CTCL complication or drug toxicity and 7 of other causes. The estimated median OS was 11.5 years (95% CI: 6.5 - not reached). The median PFS was 1.3 years (95% CI: 1.0-2.1). Conclusions: The high rate of R/R and low PFS suggest that the clinical burden of R/R MF is significant in five European countries, and recently approved targeted therapies have the potential of improving outcomes. Disclosures Bagot: Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Illidge:Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Div of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Univ of Manchester, National Institutes of Health and Research Biomedical Research Center, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, Christie Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust: Employment. Dalal:Takeda: Employment. Zomas:Takeda: Employment. Trinchese:Takeda: Employment. Little:Takeda: Employment. Bent-Ennakhil:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG: Employment. Ortiz-Romero:Actelion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; 4SC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; miRagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PLCG1: Patents & Royalties; Kyowa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Innate Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEDA: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Does Renal Failure Affect Outcome after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma?

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4642.4642 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4642-4642 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Marlies Antlanger ◽

Thomas Reiter ◽

Wolfgang Lamm ◽

Werner Rabitsch ◽

Heinz Gisslinger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Renal Failure ◽

Renal Function ◽

Renal Impairment ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Impaired Renal Function ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Outcome Data ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Introduction: Renal impairment (RI) is frequent in patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) and is a proven negative prognostic factor for overall survival (OS). MM patients with impaired renal function often fail to qualify for high-dose chemotherapy and are excluded from autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), since a higher transplant-related mortality has been postulated. However, it remains unclear whether these historical inferior outcome data still hold true in times of modern immuno-chemotherapeutical therapy regimen. Further, nephrologic definition criteria for renal impairment have evolved as well and have not yet been fully introduced into MM patient care. We thus aimed at evaluating outcome data of MM patients undergoing ASCT after immuno-chemotherapy applying current nephrologic standard criteria for RI. Methods: MM patients who had undergone ASCT at our center between 1999 and 2015 were included. Renal function was determined and staged both at the time of diagnosis and transplantation by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR according to the MDRD formula).RI was defined as eGFR <90 ml/min/m2. For sub-analyses renal failure was further staged according to KDIGO guidelines (CKD stages II, IIIa and IIIb corresponding to an eGFR of <60, <45 and <30 ml/min/m2). Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used for OS and progression-free survival (PFS) calculation. Results: 195 patients with a median age of 54 years were analyzed. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: i) normal renal function at diagnosis and ASCT ii) impaired renal function at diagnosis with normalization before ASCT and iii) impaired renal function both at the time of diagnosis and ASCT. Estimated mean OS from diagnosis was 93 months (90% CI: 77-109). No difference in OS was found comparing these 3 groups (Figure 1). Estimated mean PFS was 83 months (90% CI: 12-61). Again, in our patient cohort, renal impairment did not negatively impact PFS (Figure 2). In addition, even after further stratification according to the degree of renal failure at the time of ASCT (CKD stage II, IIIa and IIIb), no survival disadvantage was detected for patients with mild to moderate renal failure. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, a relatively large cohort of MM patients who had undergone ASCT was analyzed regarding survival data in accordance with their renal function. Since RI is associated with poorer outcome in MM patients, we aimed at working out if this holds true for patients receiving ASCT. In contrast to historical data, our data show that neither OS nor PFS were negatively impacted by mild to moderate RI. Therefore, we conclude that ASCT should rather be considered proactively in MM patients with RI than be withheld, since survival in theses patients seems not to be affected in an adverse manner. Figure 1 Overall survival according to renal function groups. Figure 1. Overall survival according to renal function groups. Figure 2 Progression-free survival according to renal function groups. Figure 2. Progression-free survival according to renal function groups. Disclosures Agis: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Intraperitoneal therapy for ovarian cancer: Impact on survival and recurrence—The result of multi-institutional studies

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.16068 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. 16068-16068

Author(s):

S. Takeuchi ◽

H. Tsubamoto ◽

S. Adachi ◽

K. Ito ◽

Y. Itani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Survival Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Observation Time ◽

Free Survival ◽

Intraperitoneal Therapy ◽

Impact On Survival ◽

The Mean

16068 Background: For optimal debulked mullerian cancer (MC), the Intraperitoneal (IP) therapy has become the effective modality of chemotherapy to obtain better prognosis. We have reported KCOG9811study: IP CDDP + Paclitaxel (PTX) intravenous (IV) 2 cycles followed by 3 cycles of usual PTX-Carboplatin (abstr.1970, ASCO2002). And we have also reported the feasibility study and satisfactory response rate of the weekly IP-PTX with IV Carboplatin therapy (IP-PIVC, abstr. 5120, ASCO2005). Objectives: We have conducted two types of IP therapy for optimal debulked MC to improve the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Here are the prognosis and recurrent fashion after these IP therapies. Methods: Twenty patients (pts) with optimal debulked ovarian cancer were enrolled for KCOG9811, and eleven pts with optimal debulked MC newly/recurrent diagnosed disease were enrolled for IP-PIVC. The regimen of each therapy consisted of as follows: KCOG9811:50mg/ m2 of CDDP was administered via IP port at operation, after 2 weeks (wks) of operation, PTX was administered at a dose of 175mg/ m2IV for 3hrs on day 1, CDDP was administered at 75mg/ m2IP on day 2, every 3wks for 2 cycles, followed by PTX 175mg/ m2 IV and Carboplatin AUC5 IV on day1 every 3wks for 3 cycles. The IP-PIVC therapy consisted of IP-PTX, on days 1, 8, 15 at a dose of 45 mg/m2 (3pts) and 60 mg/m2(8pts). Carboplatin was administered monthly at a dose of AUC 5 on day 1 only. 2–6 cycles were performed. Results: The mean observation time was 72.6 months (m) and 32.6m for KCOG9811 and IP-PIVC, respectively. As for the median PFS was 1308+ days and 678+ days, and the median OS was 2180+ days and 978+ days, respectively. The five years survival rate showed 59.3% on KCOG9811, and the three years survival rate showed 75.8% on IP-PIVC. As for recurrent fashion, liver metastases and proximal lymphnodes metastases, and retroperitoneal metastases were detected. Few cases recurred Intraperitoneal lesion with small ascites Conclusions: There are some differences in the recurrent fashion of IP treatment from that of IV treatment. IP treatment prevented ascitic recurrence. Further improvement of chemotherapy is necessary for liver metastasis and proximal lymphnodes. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Efficacy of immunotherapy with PD-1 inhibitor in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research ◽

10.2217/cer-2020-0040 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (18) ◽

pp. 1285-1292

Author(s):

Shengqi He ◽

Dongqing Hu ◽

Haixia Feng ◽

Ye Xue ◽

Jin Jin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Survival Rate ◽

Objective Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Overall Survival Rate ◽

Free Survival

Aim: PD-1 inhibitors have a leading role among immunotherapy while its efficacy on colorectal cancer (CRC) patients did not reach consensus and the small sample size remains as a limitation. Therefore, we undertook a meta-analysis on the effects of the monotherapy anti-PD-1 inhibitors in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Materials & methods: We searched databases to identify studies on efficacy of anti-PD-1 inhibitor on CRC. Objectives were objective response rate, progression-free survival rate, disease control rate and overall survival rate with their 95% CI. Results: The overall survival rate at 1-year was 64.2% (95% CI: 0.46–0.83). Disease control rate was 56.5% (CI: 0.27–0.86) and the objective response rate as 19.7% (CI: 0.08–0.32). The 1-year-progression-free survival rate was 38.4% (CI: 0.12–0.66). Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were also conducted. Conclusion: The monotherapy anti-PD-1 inhibitors are effective in treating mCRC and could be a new option for dMMR mCRC patient in first-line treatment.

Download Full-text

High-Dose Melphalan in 1 Day Versus over 2 Days Followed By Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation As Consolidation Treatment in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147860 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3944-3944

Author(s):

Mesire Aydin ◽

Man Wai Tang ◽

Marielle Wondergem ◽

David C. de Leeuw ◽

Jurgen J. Wegman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Consolidation Treatment ◽

Cell Counts ◽

High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Background High-dose melphalan (HDM) at 200 mg/m2 is a myeloablative consolidation treatment prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and is administered in 1-day or divided over 2-days. Although the 1-day regimen (lower AUC) has been shown to result in significantly less gastro-intestinal toxicity, it is not completely clear whether this administration strategy has any deleterious effects on efficacy, compared to the 2-day regimen. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of 1- or 2-day dosing of HDM on disease remission, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with MM. Methods Data from two academic centers in Amsterdam that have recently merged were used for the analysis, with one of the centers using the 1-day regimen and the other the 2-days regimen. A total of 265 patients with MM divided over the 1-day group (n=174) and 2-day group (n=91) treated between July 2017 and February 2020, were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with at least very good partial remission (≥VGPR) at day ±90 post-ASCT. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of hospitalization post-ASCT, engraftment period of neutrophils and platelets, and complications (other than mucositis) during hospitalization. Results Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Remission status of ≥VGPR was comparable between the 1-day and 2-day groups (84% vs. 80% respectively). After a median follow-up of 21 months, OS (92% vs. 91%) and PFS (80% vs. 81%) were comparable in the 1-day and 2-day group respectively. There were no differences in the incidence of hematologic adverse events between the 1-day and 2-day groups (neutropenia; 98% vs. 100%, thrombocytopenia; 90% vs. 96% respectively). Median time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC >0.5 x10 9 L -1) was significantly shorter in the 2-day group than in the 1-day group (14 days vs. 18 days, p = 0.002). Median time to platelet engraftment (platelets >20 x10 9 L -1) was comparable between the groups. Lower CD34+ cell counts were administered in the 1-day group compared to the 2-day group (2.6 vs. 3.4 x10 6/kg, p <0.0001). A significant negative correlation between the reinfused CD34+ cell counts and time to neutrophil engraftment was found (R= - 0.244). Table 2 shows the number of hospitalization days after ASCT. The median number was 18 days in the 1-day group and 15 days in the 2-day group (OR 1.22, 95% C.I. (1.10-1.35), p <0.0001). Incidences of infectious complications, febrile neutropenia and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions were not different between the groups. Conclusion The use of 1-day HDM as consolidation treatment in MM patients resulted in equal disease response, progression-free survival and overall survival as compared to 2-day HDM. Based on the results of this study showing comparable efficacy and earlier findings of reduced toxicity with the 1-day HDM administration, we recommend the 1-day protocol for HDM. Interestingly, our results also confirmed that patients might benefit from higher counts of reinfused CD34+/enucleated cells. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wondergem: Novartis: Honoraria. de Leeuw: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Biemond: Sanquin: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Honoraria; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Global Blood Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. van de Donk: Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellectis: Research Funding. Zweegman: Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nur: Roche: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Telomere Length Predicts for Outcome to FCR Chemoimmunotherapy in CLL

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114448 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1854-1854

Author(s):

Kevin Norris ◽

Peter Hillmen ◽

Andy Rawstron ◽

Robert K. Hills ◽

Duncan M Baird ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Telomere Length ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Genomic Instability ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

University Patents ◽

The Mean

Abstract Telomeres are structures that cap the ends of chromosomes and play a critical role in maintaining genomic integrity. Telomere length is a key determinant of telomere function, with short telomeres being subjected to aberrant DNA repair activity that leads to telomere fusion and large scale genomic rearrangements. Single telomere length analysis (STELA) is a high-resolution approach to determine telomere length and is capable of detecting telomeres within the length range at which fusions can occur. Using STELA, we have previously shown a link between short telomeres, telomere fusion and genomic instability in CLL. We went on to define the telomere length threshold at which the chromosome end-capping function is lost resulting in telomere fusion events and genomic instability, the so-called 'fusogenic' range. We have shown that dividing patients with CLL into those with telomeres inside the fusogenic range (IFR) and outside the fusogenic range (OFR) is powerful prognostic tool. Consequently, we developed a high-throughput version of the assay (HT-STELA) to allow for rapid evaluation of large numbers of clinical samples. In this study, we used HT-STELA to evaluate whether telomere length could predict for outcome following fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab (FCR)-based treatment using samples collected from two concurrent phase II studies, ARCTIC and ADMIRE (n = 275). Patients with a mean telomere length IFR had significantly shorter progression-free survival (P<0.0001; HR=2.17) and shorter overall survival (P=0.0002; HR=2.44) when compared to patients with a mean telomere length OFR. In contrast, CD38 expression and β2-microglobulin were not informative and IGHV mutation status was only predictive of progression-free survival (P=0.0016; HR=1.9). Bifurcation of the IGHV-mutated and unmutated subsets according to telomere length revealed that patients with short, dysfunctional telomeres in each subset had shorter progression-free survival (HR = 4.35 and HR = 1.48 respectively) and shorter overall survival (HR = 3.81 and HR = 2.18 respectively). Although the mean telomere length of the IGHV-unmutated group was significantly shorter than the IGHV-mutated group (P<0.0001), patients with long (OFR) telomeres in both subsets has a significantly better overall survival (P = 0.025; 79% at 5 years and P = 0.006; 83% at 5 years respectively). Indeed, the overall survival of the OFR and IFR subsets were not significantly different regardless of IGHVmutation status (P = 0.61; HR = 1.24 and P = 0.41; HR = 1.47 respectively). In multivariate modelling using Cox proportional hazards with forward selection, telomere length was the dominant co-variable for progression-free survival (P=0.0002; HR=1.85) and overall survival (P=0.05; HR=1.61); when telomere length was added into the model no other parameter retained independent significance in the presence of telomere length. Taken together our data suggest that telomere length is a powerful predictor of outcome to FCR-based treatment and could be used to inform the design of future risk-adapted clinical trials. Figure 1. Stratification of patients by telomere length predicts for progression-free and overall survival following FCR-based treatment. Bifurcation of the patient cohort according to the previously defined telomere length threshold for telomere dysfunction was predictive of (A)PFSand (B) OS. Patients whose telomere length were ≤ the mean of the fusogenic range (IFR) showed shorter PFS and OS than those patients with mean telomere length outside of the fusogenic range (OFR). (C) In terms of OS, the short telomere subsets in both (C)IGHV-mutated and (D)IGHV-unmutated groups showed significantly reduced survival. It is of particular interest that the OS of patients with (E)long telomeres (OFR) and (F) short telomeres (IFR) were not significantly different in IGHV-mutated and IGHV-unmutated groups. Disclosures Norris: Cardiff University: Patents & Royalties: Telomere measurement patent. Hillmen:Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding. Hills:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria. Baird:Cardiff University: Patents & Royalties: Telomere measurement patents. Pepper:Cardiff University: Patents & Royalties: Telomere measurement patents. Fegan:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Napp: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

A Phase II Multi-Center Trial Of Pentostatin Plus Cyclophosphamide With Ofatumumab (PCO) In Older Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.4177.4177 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 4177-4177 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Marco Montillo ◽

Davide Rossi ◽

Marina Motta ◽

Giulia Quaresmini ◽

Marianna Rossi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Anti Cd20

Abstract Introduction The seminal phase 3 trial conducted by the German CLL Study Group demonstrated that the addition of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody [mAb] rituximab to the FC platform (FCR) improved response rates, progression free survival and also overall survival. However, FCR showed considerable hematologic toxicity, particularly among patients over age 70. Pentostatin demonstrated similar response frequency to other purine analogues in CLL. Furthermore, its relative lack of myelotoxicity has allowed to use it with improved tolerability particularly when administered in combination with myelotoxic agents such as cyclophosphamide. Ofatumumab is a fully human anti-CD20 mAb with clinical activity as a single agent in patients with fludarabine-refractory CLL. Ofatumumab appears to have greater single agent clinical activity than rituximab in patients with previously treated CLL and also has activity in rituximab-refractory patients. Given the reported efficacy of chemo immunotherapy [CIT] in CLL and the activity and toxicity profile of pentostatin combinations, we designed a trial of pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and Ofatumumab for previously untreated older patients with CLL. Methods Patients with CLL who required therapy (2008 NCI-WG guidelines) aged ≥ 65 years and ECOG PS of 0-2 were enrolled to receive Pentostatin 2 mg/sqm and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/sqm both as intravenous infusions at day 1 of each 21 day cycle and Ofatumumab administered as intravenous infusions (Cycle 1: 300 mg day 1 and 1000 mg day 2, subsequent cycles: 1000 mg at day 1). Ofatumumab premedication included acetaminophen, antihistamine and glucocorticoid. Treatment duration was of 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) including detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) and secondary endpoints included, progression-free survival (PFS) overall survival (OS) and safety. Patients 49 patients from 12 centres from the italians regions of Lombardy and Piedmont were included. Baseline demographics were: Median age 72.8 years with 64% aged over 70, among them 32 were males (65%). Disease characteristics in 32 patients evaluable at this point were: 76% Binet stage B and 24% C; 45% of patients had unmutated IGVH, 7 % showed 17p deletions. Results ORR was 93.7% with 41% CR(11)/CR(2) with incomplete marrow recovery [CRi]. All six intended courses of treatment were administered to 30 (94%), and 90% of these patients received full-dose treatment. The reason for discontinuing treatment before completing six courses was myelosuppression occurring in 2 patients. The primary reason for dose reduction was again myelosuppression. Grade ≥3 AEs that occurred from start of treatment until 60 days after the last dose were experienced by 62% of patients receiving PCO with the most common being neutropenia [Total number of patients with at least one Grade 3 or 4 event: 19 patients] while anemia and thrombocytopenia were detected only as grade 1 to 2 in 41% and 25% of cases respectively. Of the grade 1 to 2 toxicities, fever occurred in 2 patients (6%), hypotension occurred in 2 patients (6%), nausea and vomiting occurred in 3 patients (9%), skin rash of grade 1 occurred in 2 patients. Grade 3 infusion-related AEs were reported in 12% of patients. There were no grade 4 toxicities associated with any Ofatumumab infusion. Grade 3 infection was reported in 1 patient (3%) being a pneumonia. No deaths during treatment occurred in these 32 subjects. Conclusion Ofatumumab added to Pentostatin and Cyclophosphamide demonstrated clinically important results and is well tolerated in patients with previously untreated CLL. In this preliminary report the efficacy of this ofatumumab-based CIT compares favorably to the historical rituximab-based CIT using the same chemotherapeutic agents with a more manageable side effect profile in this older population. Further data in a higher number of enrolled patients and including MRD detection will be presented at the Meeting. Disclosures: Montillo: Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Rambaldi:Novartis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Italfarmaco: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Extending Metronomic Therapy to 28 Days (metro28) for Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.5395.5395 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 5395-5395

Author(s):

Xenofon Papanikolaou ◽

Carolina Schinke ◽

Sharmilan Thanendrarajan ◽

Adam Rosenthal ◽

Nathan Petty ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Advisory Board ◽

University Of Arkansas ◽

Medical Sciences ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Introduction: Despite the enormous progress in MM therapy brought about by the rapid development of many novel agents, many patients end up with limited treatment options. We have previously reported on the efficacy and safety of metro16 in RRMM (Papanikolaou, Haematology 2013). Here we are reporting on an extension of such treatment to 28 d (metro28). Patients and Methods: The treatment consisted of a cycle of 28d continuous iv infusions of ADR and DDP each at 1mg/m2/d, along with thalidomide 50 to 100mg/d x 28; bortezomib 0.8 to 1.0mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28; DEX 8 to 12mg on days 1-4, 7-10, 13-16, 19-22, 25-28; some patients also received vincristine 0.07mg flat dose by CI for 28 days. This was off-protocol therapy that patients provided written informed consent for. The IRB permitted data retrieval and analysis. Results: 150 patients were identified, virtually all had received prior tandem transplants, bortezomib, lenalidomide, carfilzomib and pomalidomide. The median age was 64yr; B2M was elevated >=3.5mg/L in 48%, abnormal cytogenetics (CA) were present in 86%, and 44% had GEP70-defined high risk MM. Figure 1 portrays clinical outcomes. As of April 2015, 60 patients had died, and the 2-yr OS estimate was 45% (Figure 1A); the 6-mo PFS estimate was 31% although 15% had no progression at 18mo (Figure 1B). Analysis by GEP70 and GEP5 risk revealed 18-mo OS estimates of 80% among the 53 patients with low risk in both models, whereas the presence of high risk (HRMM) in either model conferred a significantly reduced 18-mo OS estimate of 25% (p<0.0001) (Figure 1C). On Cox regression analysis, OS was independently adversely affected by GEP5 HRMM (47%, HR=3.43, p<0.001), LDH >=ULN (25%, HR=3.46, p<0.001), low albumin (39%, HR=2.68, p=0.003), B2M >=3.5mg/L (51%, HR+2.63, p=0.014) and thrombocytopenia <50,000/uL (15%, HR=2.3, p=0.043). GEP5 HRMM was the sole adverse variable affecting PFS (HR=2.37, p<0.001). Most patients received metro28 in the outpatient setting, and side effects were mild. Conclusion: Metro28 represents a well-tolerated additional tool in the treatment armamentarium for RRMM. Figure 1. Clinical outcomes A: Overall survival B: Progression-free survival C: Overall survival according to GEP70 and GEP5 risk designations Figure 1. Clinical outcomes. / A: Overall survival. / B: Progression-free survival. / C: Overall survival according to GEP70 and GEP5 risk designations Figure 2. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 3. Disclosures Schinke: University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Thanendrarajan:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Rosenthal:Cancer Research and Biostatistics: Employment. Petty:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Zangari:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment; Onyx: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Heuck:Celgene: Consultancy; Foundation Medicine: Honoraria; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment; Millenium: Other: Advisory Board. van Rhee:University of Arkansa for Medical Sciences: Employment. Epstein:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Yaccoby:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Morgan:Weismann Institute: Honoraria; CancerNet: Honoraria; MMRF: Honoraria; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Davies:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Barlogie:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment.

Download Full-text