Bone Marrow Hematopoietic Dysfunction in Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Is Partially Mediated By Exposure to Constituents of the Leukemic Microenvironment
Abstract Peripheral immune dysfunction in B-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is well-studied and likely relates to the incidence of serious recurrent infections and second malignancies that plague CLL patients. However, the current paradigms of known immune abnormalities are not able to consistently explain these complications and it is not easy to correct CLL patient immune status. Here, we expand on our preliminary reports that demonstrate bone marrow (BM) hematopoietic dysfunction in early and late stage untreated CLL patients. We found reduced short-term functional capacity of hematopoietic progenitors in BM using colony forming unit assays (Figure 1A-C) and flow cytometry revealed significant reductions in frequencies of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) populations (exemplified by Lin-CD34+ HSPCs, Figure 1D). We further report that protein levels of the transcriptional regulators HIF-1α, GATA-1, PU.1, and GATA-2 are overexpressed in distinct HSPC subsets from CLL patient BM, providing molecular insight into the basis of HSPC dysfunction. Interestingly, sustained myelopoiesis, evaluated by limiting dilution analysis in long-term culture-initiating cell (LTC-IC) assays maintained for five weeks, revealed no difference between healthy controls and CLL patients. These new data indicate that when HSPCs are removed from the leukemic microenvironment for ample in vitro culture time, they recover the ability to sustain myelopoiesis. To further assess the impact of the CLL microenvironment on HSPC biology, isolated HSPCs (CD34+ BM cells) from healthy controls were exposed in vitro to known leukemic microenvironment constituents. Exposure to TNFα, a cytokine constitutively produced by CLL B cells, resulted in rapid increases in PU.1 and GATA-2 proteins (Figure 2A-D). Similarly, addition of TNFα to the LTC-IC assay resulted in a striking ablation of myelopoiesis, even at the highest input cell concentration. Further, overexpression of PU.1 and GATA-2 were observed in HSPCs following co-culture with CLL B cells, a result that was not recapitulated when cells were exposed to IL-10, another cytokine constitutively produced by CLL B cells. These findings indicate specific components of the leukemic microenvironment are involved in HSPC modulation. Together, these findings expand on our previous observations of BM hematopoietic dysfunction in untreated CLL patients and offer new molecular insights into the contribution of the leukemic microenvironment on immunodeficiency in CLL. Disclosures Ding: Merck: Research Funding. Parikh:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kay:Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta: Research Funding; Infinity Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cytomx Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.
Abstract Abstract 3867 Introduction: Despite their mature appearance, the B cells from chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) possess immature characteristics both functionally and biochemically. CLL B cells display known biochemical markers characteristic of cells early in the blood lineage, including ROR1, Wnt16, and LEF1. In addition, CLL B cells have higher levels of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and of the oxidant-induced transcription factor Nrf2 [NFE2L2], compared to normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Intracellular ROS status has been suggested to be a marker of cancer stem/progenitor cells possibly due to their high expression of oncogenes. Downstream targets of Nrf2 include the Aldehyde dehydrogenase [ALDH] enzymes, which are believed to play a crucial role in stem cell biology because they protect the cells against oxidative stress caused by accumulation of aldehydes. Here, we use ALDH activity to visualize populations of CLL B cells that may have stem/progenitor properties. Materials and Methods: Isolated PBMC from normal donors and CLL patients with aggressive and indolent disease were stained for ALDH activity with an Aldefluor assay kit (StemCell Technologies). The ALDH inhibitor, diethylaminobenzaldehyde (DEAB), was used to confirm that the fluorescent activity was due to ALDH activity. At the end of the Aldefluor assay, the cells were stained for cell surface markers, CD19, CD5, CD38 and CD34. 50,000 total events were collected for FACS analysis. Normalized Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) values were calculated by dividing each MFI value to average MFI value of normal CD19+ cells for each experiment. Data analyses were performed by FlowJo software and Prizm. P-values were calculated by One-Way ANOVA analysis with Post-Bonferroni's multiple comparison test. Results: We examine the level of ALDH expression and activity in CD19+ cells of healthy donors (n = 9), CLL samples that expressed unmutated IgVH and that were ZAP-70 positive (defined as “aggressive”, n = 14) or samples that expressed mutated IgVH and were ZAP-70 negative (defined as “indolent”, n=12). CLL B cells from patients with aggressive disease had significantly higher ALDH activities compared to normal B cells (p < 0.001) and indolent CLL B cells (p < 0.05) (Figure1). Indolent CLL B cells also have higher level of ALDH activities compared to normal B cells (p < 0.01) (Figure1). Treatment with the ALDH inhibitor, DEAB, suppressed the increased fluorescence observed in CLL B cells. In addition, ALDH high CLL B cells are CD34 negative. These data show that CLL B cells express a marker known to be associated with stem/progenitor cells, but these populations are different from CD34 positive hematopoietic stem cells. In addition, our data show that a stem/progenitor cell marker is associated with the pathogenesis of CLL. Disclosures: Kipps: Igenica: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbot Industries: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding.
Abstract Background: Venetoclax (VEN) is a selective, potent, orally bioavailable BCL-2 inhibitor FDA-approved for patients with del(17p) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and who have received ≥1 prior therapy. Based on preclinical evidence of synergy, VEN plus rituximab is being assessed in an ongoing Phase 1b study. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL received daily VEN with stepwise ramp-up over 3-4 weeks to reach daily doses of 200-600mg. After 1 week at the target dose, monthly rituximab was added for 6 doses. Responses and progression were assessed by iwCLL criteria with CT scan and bone marrow biopsy. Bone marrow assessments were done at screening, completion of combination therapy (month 7), and 2 months after clinical/radiologic criteria of iwCLL response were met. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed in peripheral blood and marrow aspirates using ≥4 color flow cytometry (min sensitivity: 0.01%). Data cutoff was 04March2016, with analysis focusing on updated safety of cytopenias experienced on the course of treatment. Results: Forty-ninepatients enrolled (48 CLL/1 SLL). Patients had received a median of 2 prior therapies (range: 1-5) and disease in 25 (51%) was considered refractory to the most recent therapy. Median time on study was 28 (<1-42) months, with 31 patients active on study. Eighteen patients discontinued: 11 due to disease progression, 3 due to toxicity (peripheral neuropathy [1], MDS [1], and death due to TLS [1]), 3 withdrew consent, and 1 was lost to follow up. Across all doses, the most common AEs of any grade were diarrhea (57%), neutropenia (55%), upper respiratory tract infection (55%), and nausea (51%). Peripheral blood cytopenias were the most common Grade 3/4 AEs (neutropenia [53%], thrombocytopenia [16%], anemia [14%], febrile neutropenia [12%], and leukopenia [12%]). Twenty-seven (55%) patients had a history of neutropenia, of whom 6 were receiving G-CSF support prior to starting VEN. Overall, in the first month of therapy, 15 (31%) experienced an AE of neutropenia (any grade). Thereafter, the rate of new AEs of neutropenia decreased over time. While there was individual patient variability, mean ANC was stable over time. Overall, 26 (53%) patients had Grade 3/4 neutropenia. Neutropenia was generally well tolerated and managed by G-CSF support in 24 patients, in addition to ≥1 dose modification in 11 of the 24 patients. Of 8 (16%) patients who experienced grade 3 infections, 2 were while neutropenic. There were no grade 4 infections. Among the 11 (22%) patients who developed any-grade thrombocytopenia, none occurred within 2 weeks of a reported bleeding-related AE. One patient had thrombocytopenia overlapping with disease progression on therapy. Objective response rate for all patients was 86% (n=42), with 51% (n=25) who had complete response (CR/CRi; 12 achieved CR/CRi by month 7). At the completion of combination therapy (month 7), 39 patients had evaluable bone marrow assessments. Thirty (77%) had no histologic evidence of CLL in the bone marrow and 22 patients (56%) had attained bone marrow MRD-negativity. In longer follow up at any point during treatment for all 49 patients, 37 (75%) patients achieved complete marrow clearance and 28 (57%) achieved marrow MRD-negativity. Conclusions: Transient manageable neutropenia was the most common AE, with first onset usually seen within the first month of treatment and the onset of new neutropenia AEs decreased over time. No patients discontinued the study due to cytopenias. Patients were able to continue on study and high rates of response to treatment were observed. VEN given with rituximab achieved rapid and profound reductions in disease burden in peripheral blood and bone marrow. 77% of evaluable patients achieved morphologic clearance by month 7, and 57% were MRD-negative at any point on study. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Brander: TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria. Roberts:AbbVie: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Genentech: Patents & Royalties: Employee of Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research which receives milestone payments related to venetoclax. Ma:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Xeme: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Lash:AbbVie: Employment. Verdugo:AbbVie: Employment, Other: may own stock. Zhu:AbbVie Inc.: Employment, Other: may own stock. Kim:AbbVie: Employment. Seymour:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.
Abstract B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is an incurable disease and represents a significant health problem in the western world. We and others have reported that primary CLL B-cells spontaneously produce increased levels of proangiogenic basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in vitro and that most CLL plasma contains elevated levels of bFGF. However, the precise role of bFGF in CLL pathobiology is not clearly understood. In this study we investigated the functional implication of the FGF/FGF receptor (FGFR) signaling axis in CLL B-cell biology. We have detected expression of FGFR1 and FGFR3 with comparatively higher levels of the latter receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), but no or notably low levels of FGFR2/FGFR4, by flow cytometry and Western blot analyses in primary CLL B-cells. This observation was further supported by detection of FGFR1/FGFR3 transcripts in CLL B-cells by semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Although both FGFR1 and FGFR3 in CLL B-cells remain as constitutively phosphorylated, we found significantly higher levels of phosphorylation on FGFR3 and thus this latter receptor is likely the predominant RTK of the FGFR family in these leukemic B-cells. Of note, in vitro stimulation of FGFRs with recombinant bFGF was unable to increase total phosphorylation on FGFRs from their constitutive basal levels in CLL B-cells. Further analysis using a bFGF neutralizing antibody suggested that FGFR phosphorylation in CLL B-cells is likely independent of bFGF ligation. We then interrogated the mechanism of how FGFRs were being phosphorylated and/or maintained at the observed constitutive levels of phosphorylation in CLL B-cells. Our previous studies established that Axl is a critical RTK in CLL B-cells since it acts as a docking site for multiple cellular kinases/lipase, an observation supported by earlier literatures in human malignancies. Given this, Axl is likely capable of cross talk with other RTKs including FGFRs to regulate FGFR-signaling in CLL B-cells. Therefore, in an effort to determine whether Axl is functionally associated with FGFR, we examined if these two RTKs exist in the same molecular complex in CLL B-cells. Indeed, immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated that Axl formed a complex with FGFR3 in CLL B-cells, suggesting that Axl is likely functionally linked to the FGFR signaling. In this regard we found that Axl inhibition, using a high-affinity Axl inhibitor (TP-0903; Tolero Pharmaceuticals), resulted in significant reduction of total FGFR phosphorylation in CLL B-cells. Additionally, siRNA-mediated partial depletion of Axl in CLL B-cells reduced total FGFR phosphorylation. In contrast, inhibition of FGFR phosphorylation using a high-affinity FGFR inhibitor could not alter phosphorylation levels on Axl RTK in CLL B-cells. Together, these findings suggest that Axl has a dominant role in the regulation of FGFR signaling in CLL B-cells. To find out if inhibition of FGFR can induce apoptosis in CLL B-cells we used a specific inhibitor for FGFR (TKI-258; Novartis) to treat CLL B-cells. Here we found a substantial level of apoptosis induction in the leukemic B-cells with a mean LD50 dose of ~2.5 μM. Interestingly, Axl inhibition by TP-0903 induced a robust level of apoptosis in CLL B-cells in the nanomolar dose range with a mean LD50 dose of 0.14 mM. Thus Axl inhibition exerts a very robust cytotoxic effect on CLL B-cell survival likely targeting both Axl and FGFR signaling pathways via Axl inhibition. In conclusion, we have detected expression of constitutively active FGFR1 and 3 in primary CLL B-cells and that inhibition of FGFR signaling induces considerable levels of CLL B-cell apoptosis albeit lower than that observed on Axl RTK inhibition. Interestingly, our findings here suggest that Axl forms an active RTK complex with FGFR and that Axl inhibition modifies FGFR phosphorylation levels. Thus it is likely that Axl RTK can regulate FGFR signaling in the CLL B-cells. In total these observations suggest that the finding of robust induction of apoptosis in CLL B-cells is as a result of targeting two signaling pathways with Axl inhibition: Axl and FGFR. These studies further support investigation of Axl inhibition as a way to develop a more effective and efficient therapeutic intervention for CLL patients. Disclosures Warner: Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Kay:Genetech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Abstract Background The glycoengineered type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody obinutuzumab (GA101; GAZYVA/GAZYVARO; G) combined with chlorambucil (Clb) has superior efficacy to Clb monotherapy and to rituximab plus Clb with an acceptable safety profile in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), as shown in the CLL11 study (Goede V, et al. NEJM 2014). GREEN is an ongoing, non-randomized, multi-cohort phase IIIb study (NCT01905943) investigating the safety (primary objective) and efficacy of G alone or in combination with chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory CLL and assessing various strategies (cohorts 1-3) for reducing the rate of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) during the first infusion of G (Bosch F, et al. Blood 2014). We report safety and efficacy data from a subgroup of previously untreated patients in cohort 1 who received G-bendamustine (G-B). Methods Subjects were aged ≥18 years withdocumented CLL (except one case of SLL), an ECOG performance status of 0-2, and adequate hematologic function. Non-fit patients were those with a CrCl of <70 mL/min, and/or a CIRS score of >6. Fit patients comprised all others. Treatment was six 28-day cycles of G-B, where G was administered IV on D1/D2 of C1 (split dose: 25mg D1/975mg D2), and 1000mg on D8 and D15 of C1 and D1 C2-6. B was administered ≥30 minutes after G on D1 and D2 of each cycle at 90mg/m2 IV, or at 70mg/m2 in non-fit patients at the investigator's discretion. Safety endpoints included incidence, type and severity of AEs. Efficacy endpoints included ORR (investigator-assessed) and minimal residual disease (MRD) measured 3 months post-treatment. ORR was strictly assessed per International Workshop Group criteria (iwCLL 2008). Patients with missing response assessment components had their responses downgraded mandatorily. MRD negativity was defined as <1x10-4 malignant B cells in peripheral blood or bone marrow aspirate, measured in a central laboratory by 4-color flow cytometry. The population comprised all patients from cohort 1 of GREEN who received at least a partial dose of both G and B, and was based on a data cut-off of 26 March 2015. Results With a planned overall sample size of 950 patients in GREEN, the G-B subgroup in cohort 1 comprised 158 patients (157 CLL, 1 SLL; 74 fit, 84 non-fit). Median age was 67.6 years, 15.8% of patients had a CIRS score of >6, and 44.9% had a CrCl of <70 mL/min; 31.6% of patients had Binet stage A disease, 38% Binet B, and 30.4% Binet C. 7.0% of patients' disease displayed 17p deletion, 16.5% 11q deletion, and 58.2% unmutated IGHV. 91.1% of patients receiving B and 93.0% of those receiving G took ≥90% of the recommended total dose. The safety profile of G-B was as expected. 50% of patients developed grade 3-5 neutropenia and 12.7% developed a grade 3-5 infection. Other common grade 3-5 AEs included thrombocytopenia (12.7%) and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS; 10.1%). The most common serious AEs were neutropenia (10.8%), pyrexia (7.6%), febrile neutropenia (7.0%), and TLS (5.1%). There were nine deaths - one due to progression, and eight due to AEs (considered related to study drug by the investigator: 1 infection, 1 sudden death, 1 acute hepatic failure, and 1 febrile neutropenia combined with TLS; considered unrelated: 2 infections and 2 secondary neoplasms). IRRs occurred in 55.7% of patients (15.2% grade 3-5, none fatal). Overall, 26 patients (16.5%) prematurely discontinued treatment due to ≥1 adverse event. The ORR was 78.5% (124/158). The rate of CR (including incomplete CR [CRi]) was 32.3% (51/158), PR 46.2% (73/158), SD 10.8% (17/158), and PD 0.6% (1/158); 10.1% (16/158) of patients had missing data. Response rates were similar in non-fit (34.5% CR/CRi, 41.7% PR, 10.7% SD, and 1.2% PD) and fit (29.7% CR/CRi, 51.4% PR, 10.8% SD, and 0% PD) patients. In an intent-to-treat analysis including all missing (not taken or evaluable) MRD results, MRD negativity was 58.9% (93/158, including 56 missing) in blood and 27.8% (44/158, including 95 missing) in bone marrow. With a median observation time of 11.2 months, PFS data were immature and the median was not reached. Conclusions Treatment with G-B in previously-untreated CLL patients is generally well tolerated and the observed toxicities are manageable and not unexpected. G-B achieves a promising rate of CRs and a high rate of MRD-negative remissions, and may offer a new treatment option for fit and non-fit patients with CLL. Disclosures Stilgenbauer: Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: GAZYVA (obinutuzumab) is a CD20-directed cytolytic antibody and is indicated, in combination with chlorambucil, for the treatment of patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). This abstract reports on obinutuzumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy for previously untreated or relapsed/refractory CLL. Renner:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Böttcher:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Beckton Dickinson: Honoraria. Tausch:Gilead: Other: Travel support. Moore:Roche: Employment. Tyson:Roche: Employment, Equity Ownership. Adamis:Roche: Employment. Leblonde:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Speakers Bureau. Bosch:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Foà:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.
Abstract BACKGROUND. Mutations in NOTCH1 PEST domain (NOTCH1-M) are present in ~10% of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) patients, result in accumulation of more stable NOTCH1 protein, and associate with poorer prognosis. NOTCH1-M are enriched in unmutated (U) immunoglobulin gene heavy-chain variable region (IGHV) CLL, which show high surface IgM (sIgM) expression and signaling capacity. mRNA translation is a prominent response to B cell receptor (BCR) engagement, increased in U-CLL, and for which therapeutic inhibitors are under active development. In CLL, c-MYC is an essential mediator of BCR-driven translation and direct target of NOTCH1, suggesting the impact of NOTCH1 on anti-IgM-mediated cell growth via MYC. AIMS AND METHODS. Our aim was to investigate the functional role of NOTCH1-M on anti-IgM-mediated signaling, compared to wild-type (WT) NOTCH1. The impact on global mRNA translation was studied using a flow cytometry-based O-propargyl-puromycin (OPP) incorporation assay and polysome fractionation assays. The effects of stabilized vs WT NOTCH1 were measured after 24-hour cultures of CLL cells, when data demonstrate differences in the expression of the two forms. Two cohorts of U-CLLs were compared: i) a subset of samples carrying NOTCH1-M [variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥30%, n=21] and ii) a cohort of samples with WT NOTCH1 (VAF<1%, n=23). In both subsets no additional cytogenetic lesions other than 13q deletion were present. RESULTS. sIgM levels and signaling capacity (measured by anti-IgM mediated iCa2+ mobilization) were higher in NOTCH1-M than in -WT samples, consistent with previous observations (1). Conceivably, anti-IgM-mediated phosphorylation of PLCg2 and ERK1/2 was stronger in M than in WT CLLs. In keeping with these results, expression of downstream targets as MYC and CCL3 was also induced at higher levels in M samples. Interestingly, inhibition of NOTCH1 with g-secretase inhibitor (DAPT) significantly decreased BCR target genes induction in M cells, reducing the differences with WT samples, and further enhanced the effects of ibrutinib when used in combination. In order to investigate the impact of NOTCH1 on IgM-mediated CLL cell growth, anti-IgM-induced global mRNA translation was compared in the two cohorts. Consistent with the higher MYC mRNA and protein levels, anti-IgM led to higher global mRNA translation in NOTCH1-M than in -WT cells. DAPT inhibited it in both CLL subsets, while ibrutinib led to complete inhibition of mRNA translation only in the -WT subset, suggesting a major contribution of NOTCH1 to the process. Consistently, the combination of DAPT+ibrutinib abrogated the difference between M and WT CLL cells. Importantly, MYC (but not translation initiation factors eIF4G, eIF4A or eIF3b) was already induced at 6 hours following anti-IgM stimulation and was maintained at high levels at 24 hours, while up-regulation of eIF4G, eIF4A and eIF3b was evident only at 24 hours, supporting the hypothesis of a direct MYC-dependent regulation of the translation machinery (2). NOTCH1 itself was post-transcriptionally regulated upon BCR ligation, as we observed increased NOTCH1 mRNA in polysome-enriched actively translated fractions and increased protein levels on the surface of anti-IgM stimulated cells, specifically inhibited by ibrutinib. Consequently, NOTCH1 pathway was significantly more activated upon anti-IgM stimulation in M than WT cells, as determined by qPCR of NOTCH1 target genes. Both Ibrutinib and DAPT significantly prevented NOTCH1 activation upon BCR triggering, with the drug combination being the most effective treatment. Moreover, in line with data showing NOTCH1-dependent regulation of a B cell gene signature, expression of BTK, LYN and BLNK was significantly increased in anti-IgM activated NOTCH1-M samples, an effect prevented by DAPT. CONCLUSIONS. These data indicate that NOTCH1 stabilization associates with stronger IgM signaling capacity and suggest an interplay between BCR and NOTCH1 pathway, with the former promoting NOTCH1 expression and activation. The evidence that NOTCH1 pathway inhibition reverts this difference suggests a direct effect of NOTCH1 on IgM signaling. In this scenario, stabilizing NOTCH1 mutations may enhance BCR signaling by boosting translation through MYC induction and by directly regulating expression of BCR cascade elements. NOTES. SD and FF share senior authorshipD'Avola, Blood 2016Ruggero, Cancer Res 2009 Disclosures Coscia: Abbvie, Gilead, Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen, Karyopharm: Research Funding. Gaidano:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Allan:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta: Consultancy; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Furman:Gilead: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Other: DSMB; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy. Packham:Aquinox: Research Funding. Deaglio:iTeos therapeutics: Research Funding; VelosBio inc: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding. Forconi:Abbvie: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy.
Abstract A key feature of tumor cell energetics is preferential metabolism of glucose to lactate even in the presence of oxygen (aerobic glycolysis). While this is an inefficient way of producing energy, it enables cancer cells to use glucose to generate biomass to support cellular proliferation. It is unclear whether this process is playing a role in the pathogenesis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Previous studies have noted that CLL cells have increased numbers of mitochondria when compared with healthy B cells (Carew Leukaemia 2004, Jitschin Blood 2014). As CLL cells have increased expression of lipoprotein lipase it has been hypothesized that CLL cells adopt a predominantly mitochondrial metabolism. In this study, we investigated the role of metabolism in the pathogenesis of CLL. While initial analysis of mitochondrial mass by flow cytometry showed that CLL cells do have increased mitochondrial content compared to healthy B cells, these and previous observations were comparing a monoclonal population of CLL cells with a CD27+ activated/memory phenotype with polyclonal healthy B cells predominantly composed of naïve CD27- cells. When we investigated this further we found that healthy CD27+ memory B cells have a higher mitochondrial mass when compared with healthy CD27- naïve B cells. CLL cells actually had reduced mitochondrial mass when compared healthy CD27+ memory B cells, which fell further with disease progression. B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling plays a vital role in the pathogenesis of CLL, as shown by the clinical efficacy of inhibitors of this pathway. Despite this little is known regarding the impact of BCR-signaling on CLL-cell metabolism. Primary human CLL cells were stimulated with either anti-IgM, anti-IgD or anti-IgG (isotype control) for up to 72 hours before measuring the residual glucose concentration of the media to assess glucose uptake. Anti-IgM treated CLL cells showed an increase in glucose uptake compared to control. The impact of anti-IgM on the expression of enzymes involved in glycolysis including glucose transporters (GLUTs), hexokinase, phosphofructokinase, enolase, and pyruvate kinase was assessed by immunoblotting. As myc is induced by BCR-signaling in CLL cells we focused on known myc targets hexokinase 2 (HK2), enolase 1 (ENOL-1), lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) and the heterogenous nuclear ribonuclearproteins (hnRNPs) A1, A2/B1 and PTBP1. GLUT3, HK2 and the hnRNPs were all expressed at low levels in resting CLL cells but increased significantly (at 24 hours) after anti-IgM stimulation. The other myc targets ENOL-1 and LDHA were constitutively expressed and did not increase further after stimulation. There was significant heterogeneity in response to anti-IgM stimulation with IGHV unmutated cases showing a trend toward greater glucose uptake and enzyme induction, while anti-IgD stimulation had a similar but weaker effect. Immunohistochemistry on lymph node biopsies from CLL patients showed a significant increase in expression of GLUT3 and HK2 within CLL proliferation centres. hnRNP induction has been shown to promote a switch to use of the M2 isoform of pyruvate kinase (PKM2): a key feature of many cancers. Interestingly, both circulating and lymph node CLL cells were already switched to using PKM2 and so anti-IgM stimulation had little further effect. However, when the relative levels of PKM1 and PKM2 were compared between early- and advanced-stage patients there was a significant shift to use of PKM2 with disease progression. Treatment of CLL cells in vitro by ibrutinib, idelalisib and the MEK inhibitor U0126 all blocked the anti-IgM induced increase in glucose uptake and GLUT3, HK2 and hnRNP expression. Investigation of the expression of GLUT3 and HK2 in CLL cells obtained from ibrutinib-treated patients also showed a reduction in the expression of these proteins demonstrating that ibrutinib is metabolically reprogramming CLL cells in vivo. We conclude that previous observations regarding an increase in mitochondrial mass in CLL cells compared to healthy B cells reflects their differentiation states. In contrast, we show that BCR-signaling increases glucose uptake and glycolytic enzyme expression in a myc-dependent manner as part of a switch to aerobic glycolysis. Treatment with BCR inhibitors block this effect. Therefore, we anticipate that many of the novel anti-glycolytic therapies currently in development will prove useful in the treatment of CLL. Disclosures Kipps: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gribben:Acerta Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Wellcome Trust: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Kite: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria; Cancer Research UK: Research Funding; Unum: Equity Ownership; Medical Research Council: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; NIH: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria.
RNA splicing factor SF3B1 is one of the most recurrently mutated genes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but expression of this mutation alone in murine B cells does not result in CLL. This gene mutation is often subclonal and associated with poor survival. How this mutation impacts CLL progression remains elusive. Since SF3B1 mutation frequently co-occurs with chromosome 13q deletion (del(13q)), and mice with deletion of the Minimal Deleted Region (MDR) of del(13q) develop indolent CLL, we therefore asked whether co-expression of Sf3b1 mutation can accelerate the onset of CLL in this murine model. If so, how does Sf3b1 mutation mechanistically contribute to CLL. To this end, we first crossed mice carrying conditional knock in allele Sf3b1-K700E and mice with conditional knockout of MDR. We then bred the offspring with CD19-Cre mice to generate cohorts of mice which have B cell-specific homozygous deletion of MDR with (DM) or without (MDR-MT) heterozygous Sf3b1-K700E. We monitored the onset of CLL by tracking of circulating B220+CD5+ CLL-like cells from peripheral blood with flow cytometry, starting at the age of 6-months and ending by 24-months. We detected CLL-like disease in 24% (6 of 25) of DM and 7.4% (2 of 27) of MDR-MT mice with disease presence in the spleen, bone marrow and lymph node, confirmed by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. The increased frequency of CLL in DM mice indicated that Sf3b1-K700E could accelerate CLL (Pearson Chi-Square 2-sided, p=0.098). To elucidate how Sf3b1 mutation contributes to increased CLL penetrance, we performed integrated RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and TMT proteomics analysis with splenic B cells derived from DM mice with and without CLL. We found that genes involved in MYC, cell cycle checkpoints and mTORC1 pathways are upregulated and enriched at both the RNA and protein levels when we compared DM-CLL cells to their DM B cell counterparts, indicating these cellular processes are involved in the onset of CLL. To further define the role of Sf3b1-K700E mediated alternative splicing in the activation of these pathways, we first identified candidate splicing isoforms (nfatc1, braf, depdc5, tsc2) through computational analysis of RNA-seq data and then validated the isoforms in an independent cohort of samples (n=3,). Functional annotation of how exactly these isoforms impact CLL is ongoing. Importantly, we also observed gene upregulation of mTORC1 pathway in human CLL cells with SF3B1 mutation and del(13q) when compared with normal B cells. We next asked whether DM CLL cells are sensitive to inhibition of mTORC1 pathway and RNA splicing inhibition in vitro. We exposed DM B and CLL cells to either Temsirolimus (Tem, mTORC1 inhibitor), or H3B8800 (H3B, SF3B1 inhibitor) alone or in combination for 24 hours and then measured the cell viability with CellTiter-Glo assay. When compared to DMSO control, both Tem and H3B single treatments significantly inhibited the survival of DM CLL cells, but not DM B cells (all groups vs control, unpaired t test, p<0.01). Furthermore, an additive effect was observed in DM CLL cells when 1nM of H3B was combined with Tem treatment (IC50: 1.2nM vs. 135.2uM, unpaired t test p<0.001). We then tested the effects of both drugs in vivo using NSG mice engrafted with DM CLL cells. Mice treated with combination of Tem (15mg/kg, i.p, 5 days) and H3B (4mg/kg, gavage, 5 days) had a lower CLL burden in peripheral blood in comparison to either the single treatment or no drug treatment group (all groups vs. comb, p≤0.001). Furthermore, the combination treatment increased the survival of NSG mice engrafted with CLL cells compared to control (median survival: control vs. comb 15 vs. 34 days, log rank p<0.001). Importantly, when we exposed human CLL cells with both del(13q) and sf3b1 mutation (DM-CLL, n=3), or with del(13q) alone (n=2), or normal B cells (n=4) to the combination treatment in vitro, DM-CLL cells showed the highest sensitivity to the treatment (DM-CLL vs. all groups, p<0.05), suggesting that SF3B1 mutation may accelerate CLL with del(13q) through modulating RNA splicing and mTORC1 pathway. Our study demonstrates that expression of Sf3b1-K700E could accelerate the development of CLL based on MDR deleted murine model through alternative RNA splicing and mTORC1 activation. This finding supports the use of an mTORC1 inhibitor together with RNA splicing inhibitor in the subset of CLL patients with both SF3B1 mutation and del(13q). Disclosures Kipps: Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech/Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascerta/AstraZeneca, Celgene, Genentech/F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Gilead, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Octernal Therapeutics, Pharmacyclics/AbbVie, TG Therapeutics, VelosBio, and Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics/ AbbVie, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc., Specialized Center of Research (SCOR) - The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (LLS), California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; VelosBio: Research Funding; Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc.: Other: Cirmtuzumab was developed by Thomas J. Kipps in the Thomas J. Kipps laboratory and licensed by the University of California to Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc., which provided stock options and research funding to the Thomas J. Kipps laboratory, Research Funding. Neuberg:Celgene: Research Funding; Madrigak Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Wu:BionTech: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.
Abstract Introduction: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a common leukemia which tends to occur late in life. Comorbidities are common, and the iwCLL guidelines recommend their assessment in patients (pts) enrolled on clinical trials. The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) is a rigorous tool designed to evaluate the burden of comorbidities, which has been employed in therapeutic studies. Our group and others demonstrated that CIRS score predicts survival in pts with CLL treated with either chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) or novel kinase inhibitors (KI; ibrutinib) (Manda et al, 2016 & Gordon et al, 2018). However, CIRS has not become part of common clinical practice, in part due to complexities in scoring. It is also unknown whether all of the 14 organ systems included in the score carry equal weight to determine prognosis. Here we report the impact of specific comorbidities from a multicenter retrospective cohort of CLL pts treated with either CIT or KI. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of pts with CLL treated at five US academic medical centers between 2000 and 2017. CIRS score was calculated as in Salvi et al, 2008. Random forest (RF) was used to assess specific comorbidities' impact on overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS, defined as time to new therapy, disease progression or death). We adapted two separate approaches to investigate the RF variable selection process: variable Importance (VIMP), a property related to variable misspecification, and Minimal Depth (MD), a property derived from the construction of trees within the forest. Best variables were those selected consistently as top 3 in both VIMP and MD on the 500 RF repetitions. Because hepatic and renal comorbidities were rare they were excluded. OS and EFS were assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for performance status and age. Significance was assessed with log-rank test. Results: 398 pts were included in the final analysis. The median age was 63 years (range, 30-93). 50% of pts (n=198) had a high CIRS score (≥7). 184 pts (46%) had comorbidities assessed in relapsed setting. For all pts, the most common treatments included ibrutinib (n=145; 37%), fludarabine-containing regimens (n=104; 26%) and bendamustine (n=39; 10%). Complex karyotype was observed in 3.5% (n=14) and 10.6% (n=42) of pts had del(17p). Pts with comorbidities (CIRS ≥7) demonstrated shortened survival following therapy, with 5-year OS of 64% vs 89% (p<0.0001) and median EFS of 24 vs 49 months (p<0.0001). Pts treated with CIT had lower CIRS scores compared pts on KIs (6.5 vs 8.7, p<0.001), however there was no difference in CIRS between pts treated with high vs. low intensity CIT (e.g. FCR/BR vs chlorambucil/rituximab [n=59]; CIRS 6.8 vs 6.6, p=0.78), indicating comorbidities are not consistently taken into account when selecting therapy. Random forest variable selections identified vascular comorbidities (e.g. DVT/PE) as the most influential risk factor for OS with CIT treatment, while HEENT and cardiac comorbidities were most impactful to OS for patients treated with KI. For EFS, the most influential comorbidities were cardiac and vascular for the CIT treatment group and endocrine and HEENT for patients treated with KI. Across EFS and OS, the most frequently selected variables in CIT were cardiac, hypertension, vascular and neurologic. We constructed a simplified scoring system assigning 1 point for each category. Comparing scores of 0, 1 and 2-4 (n=100, n=82, n=60), 5-year OS was 87%, 82% and 66%, respectively (p<0.0001). In an adjusted Cox model OS decreased between risk groups (HR=1.78; 95% CI, 1.2-2.6; p=0.004). Cardiac, vascular, HEENT and endocrine were the most frequently selected in pts receiving KI. Comparing scores of 0, 1 and 2-4 (n=50, n=51, n=55), 2-year OS was 98%, 87% and 81%, respectively (p=0.034). There was a trend towards increased risk of death in the adjusted cox model (HR=1.63; 95% CI, 0.80-3.34; p=0.19). Conclusion: Comorbidities impact survival in CLL whether treated with CIT or KI. Which comorbidities are most prognostic may vary by treatment type. Vascular and cardiac comorbidities appear to be the most relevant in CLL pts treated with CIT. Meanwhile, cardiac, endocrine and HEENT had greater impact when pts were treated with KI. A simplified CIRS score is predictive of outcomes in both treatment subgroups. Disclosures Choi: Gilead: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie, Inc: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Rigel: Consultancy; Genentech: Speakers Bureau. Cohen:Takeda: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioInvent: Consultancy. Persky:Genentech: Honoraria; Morphosys (IDMC): Consultancy; Spectrum: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Danilov:Aptose Biosciences: Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bayer Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding.
Introduction: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is characterized by the accumulation of mature-appearing malignant lymphocytes (CLL B-cells) in the blood, marrow, lymph nodes, and spleen. Despite improved outcome with the introduction of novel BCR and BCL-2 inhibitors, disease progression is still a therapeutic challenge from either differential responses or acquired drug resistance. Recent studies in CLL reported alterations of the epigenetic landscape as well as mutations of genes encoding key chromatin machineries. These aberrant chromatin structures may provide novel therapeutic targets for CLL. Here, we identify aberrant chromatin features in CLL B-cells as novel therapeutic targets. Methods: Histones were extracted by acid from B cells derived from 10 random selected CLL patients and 10 normal donors and histone modifications were checked by western blot. For ChIP-seq study, published H3K27me3 ChIP-seq data (GSE113336) were downloaded from and analyzed (Control samples, n= 6; CLL samples, n=16). Gene ontology analysis used the Panther Classification System. Cell Survival was determined by CellTiter 96® AQueous Assay (Promega). Results: While most histone modifications do not vary between CLL and controls, H3K27me3 and H3.3S31ph are increased and decreased respectively, albeit variably, in CLL B-cells (Fig1. A and B). Notably, the low level of H3.3S31ph was observed in a subset of samples (7 of 10 CLL samples tested). To further investigate the biology and role of H3K27me3 in CLL, we analyzed its genome-wide distribution by chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq). Our analysis showed that the genes with increased H3K27me3 occupancy were mostly enriched in tumor suppression pathways (e.g., negative regulation of PI3K-Akt pathway) or down-regulated genes in CLL such as genes involved in the pro-apoptotic pathway (FAS) (Fig1. C and D). These results suggested that high enrichment of H3K27me3 may regulate the expression of these genes, contributing to CLL survival. H3K27 methylation, an important suppressive histone modification that is associated with transcription repression, is catalyzed by Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2). Therefore, inhibition of Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 (EZH2), the catalytic subunit of PRC2, could be explored as a therapy approach in CLL. However, feedback activation of H3K27 acetylation (H3K27ac) can promote expression of pro-survival genes that confers EZH2 inhibitor (EZH2i) resistance, which limits its use in human malignancy. Thus, the epigenetic determinants that reliably overcome EZH2i resistance or sensitize cells to EZH2 inhibition have yet to be identified. As we observed that the CLL B-cells in a subset of CLL patients have low levels of H3.3S31ph, and a recent study showed the importance of H3.3S31ph for the enzymatic activity of p300 to acetylate H3 at lysine 27(Martire S et al., Nat Genet. 2019), we assessed the role of H3.3S31ph in the process of EZH2 inhibitor-mediated H3K27ac. Our results showed that inhibition of H3.3S31ph by CHK1 inhibitor MK-8776 abolished the activation of H3K27ac by EZH2i in MEC1 cells, which represents the patients who have CLL cells with relatively high level H3.3S31ph. However, we did not see a major increase of H3K27ac and H3.3S31ph in primary CLL B-cells with EZH2 inhibition (Fig. 1E), consistent with the relatively low expression of CHK1 protein in these cells (Fig. 1F). Because our data shows the requirement of H3.3S31ph in H3K27ac activation by EZH2 inhibition, we next tested if H3.3S31ph inhibition could overcome H3K27ac induced EZH2 inhibition resistance. We found that suppression of H3.3S31ph by CHK1 inhibitor MK-8776 sensitizes the CLL-like line MEC1 to EZH1/2 inhibition (Fig. 1 G). We then showed that an EZH2 inhibitor, Valemetostat, reduce the survival of the primary CLL B-cells (Fig. 1 H). These results suggest that the low level of H3.3S31ph may provide a therapeutic opportunity for CLL treatment with EZH inhibition. Conclusion: In summary, we have elucidated how epigenetic features in leukemic CLL B-cells (H3K27me3 and H3.3S31ph), can provide novel treatment targets for CLL (Fig. 1 I). Moreover, this study may provide a proof of concept to develop new treatment strategies based on epigenetic vulnerabilities in other hematological malignancies. Disclosures Parikh: GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Verastem Oncology: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding. Kenderian:Kite: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Torque: Consultancy; Sunesis: Research Funding. Ding:Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; DTRM: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Braggio:DASA: Consultancy; Bayer: Other: Stock Owner; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding. Kay:Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Theraputics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding.
Abstract Introduction: Given the established role of PD-1 in mediating immune suppression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), we tested and reported the efficacy of PD-1 blocking antibody pembrolizumab in relapsed and transformed CLL patients. A selective response of pembrolizumab (~40%) in patients with RT, particularly after prior ibrutinib, was observed (Ding, Blood, 129:3419). Correlative analysis showed PD-1 expression in tumor B-cells of patients with RT and aggressive CLL after progression on ibrutinib. PD-1, an inhibitory receptor expressed on CLL T-cells, inhibits the immune synapse and cytotoxic T cell functions via the interactions with its ligands. However, the expression pattern and role of PD-1 in tumor B-cells is not well defined. In this study we investigated the functional implication of the PD-1 signaling axis in B-cell pathobiology in CLL and RT patients. Methods: 26 CLL-involved lymph node (LN) and 20 RT-involved LN were tested for PD-1 expression by immunohistochemistry (mouse clone NAT105, Abcam). For in vitro study, we checked PD-1 expression in 11 lymphoma cell lines and 1 CLL cell line by both flow cytometry and Western blot (WB) analysis. Effect of PD-1 knockdown using CRISPR/Cas9 system (Addgene) and over-expression of PD-1 using pLEX-lentiviral (Thermoscientific) or pRetro-retroviral (Clonetech) system were evaluated on pro-survival and apoptotic signaling pathways by Western blot analysis. Gene expression signatures in CLL and RT patients were also evaluated by Illumina-based RNA sequencing using FFPE-nodal tissue obtained by clinical biopsy (Tempus Labs; Chicago, IL). Results: The expression of PD-1 was significantly increased in RT-LN compared to CLL-LN. (mean ± SEM in RT vs. CLL, 30.6 ± 4.7 vs. 11.5 ± 2.8, p < 0.001). PD-1 expression was highest in patients with RT where the immediate prior CLL therapy was ibrutinib (Figure 1A). Among all cell lines tested for PD-1 expression, the expression of PD-1 by WB and flow was highest in Mino (mantle cell lymphoma line), followed by moderate expression in Jvm2 (B-PLL line) and Mec1 (CLL line), and very low-level expression in both Jeko-1 (B-NHL line) and lymphoma line 'Karpas299'. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated depletion of PD-1 in Mino cells inhibited constitutively active Akt, p70S6K and mTOR pathway, accompanied by significant downregulation of the anti-apoptotic proteins, Bcl-2, Mcl-1 and XIAP, but P-ERK1/2 was not affected. Constitutive lentiviral (pLEX-PD-1)-mediated overexpression of PD-1 in Jeko-1 and doxycycline regulated inducible retroviral (pRetro-PD-1) mediated overexpression of PD-1 in Karpas299 activated Akt, mTOR and p70S6K pathway. Overexpression of PD-1 in Jeko-1 significantly increased Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 and in Karpas299 increased Bcl-2, Mcl-1 and XIAP expression (Figure 1B). A parallel genetic analysis using RNA sequencing was performed on 5 nodal tissues involved by either RT or progressive CLL after these patients developed clinical progression after prior ibrutinib therapy. In all 5 patients, overexpression of PD-1 was associated with increased expression of Bcl-2 and mTOR regardless of the genetic mutations detected (including TP53, ATM, BTK, NOTCH1, XPO1, SF3B1, TET2 etc). However, in 2 patients who received prior chemoimmunotherapy, similar overexpression of gene signature was not observed by RNA sequencing analysis, alternative pathways including Met or NFkB overexpression was detected. Given these clinical and laboratory findings, we have treated 2 RT patients with a combination of BTK and Bcl-2 inhibitors (ibrutinib and venetoclax, respectively) whose CLL transformed after prior ibrutinib. Significant reduction of tumor burden was observed in both cases with one complete response and one mixed response. Conclusion: An increased expression of PD-1, Akt/mTOR and Bcl-2 gene signature was first observed in RT patients after prior ibrutinib therapy. PD-1 overexpression in the tumor B-cells of RT and progressive CLL patients likely regulate AKT/mtOR to upregulate Bcl-2. Targeting both BTK and Bcl-2 pathways in addition to PD-1 blockade appear to be a promising strategy to treat these aggressive diseases. Disclosures Parikh: Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kenderian:Novartis: Patents & Royalties; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Humanigen: Research Funding. Ansell:Takeda: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Celldex: Research Funding; Merck & Co: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Kay:Infinity Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta: Research Funding; Agios Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ding:Merck: Research Funding.
