scholarly journals Efficacy of Ponatinib after Multiple Lines of Therapy for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3013-3013
Author(s):  
Mahesh Swaminathan ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Koji Sasaki ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Abstract Background: Ponatinib, a third-generation pan-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), was found to be effective in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). With the availability of multiple TKI, these agents are used in different sequences, and there is limited information on the value of various TKI in different lines of therapy. Since ponatinib has been effective in 3rd and subsequent lines of therapy, we performed an analysis of a cohort of pts with CML who received ponatinib as a different line of treatment. Method: A total of 80 pts with chronic phase of CML and received ponatinib from 2009 to 2018 were analyzed. Only pts who received ponatinib as a second or subsequent line of therapy of CML were included. Major cytogenetic response (MCyR), complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR), molecular response (MR) 4, and MR 4.5 were assessed. Event-free (EFS), transformation-free (TFS), failure-free (FFS) and overall survival (OS) were also analyzed. Results: Nine pts (11%) received ponatinib as a 2nd line therapy (prior TKI imatinib in 6, dasatinib in 1, and nilotinib in 2 pts); 21 (26%) as a 3rd line, 26 (33%) as a 4th line, and 24 (30%) as a 5th and above line. The median age was over 50 years (Y) in all the groups except for pts who received ponatinib as a 3rd line [38 Y (23-76)]. Among pts who received ponatinib as 2nd line, 9 (100%) achieved CCyR and MR 4.5; the median time to achieve CCyR and MR 4.5 was 3 and 6.8 months (mo), respectively (Table 1). In pts treated in 3rd line CCyR and MR 4.5 were 67% and 57%, respectively and the median time to response was 4.8 and 19.3 mo, respectively. Of the 26 pts treated in 4th line, 13 (50%) achieved CCyR (median time to CCyR 3 mo) and 7 (27%) achieved MR 4.5 (median time 11.6 mo). In 5th line and above 14 (58%) achieved CCyR (median time 6.4 mo) and 8 (33%) achieved MR 4.5 (median time 12.3 mo) (Figure 1). After a median follow-up of 59.8 months (range, 4.7 to 114.3) for all pts, the median OS was not reached in pts treated in 2nd to 4th line and 81.4 mo in ≥5th line. The median FFS was not reached in 2nd line, and was 45.6, 20.2, and 17.8 mo in 3rd, 4th, and ≥5th line, respectively. The median EFS and TFS was not reached in any line of treatment. The TFS was significantly better in pts who received ponatinib as a 2nd-4th line therapy as compared to ≥5th [p=0.0026, HR-55.97 (4.076-768.7)] (Figure 2). Conclusion: Our results suggest that CCyR and MR 4.5 were higher when ponatinib was used in up to 4th line of therapy for resistant CML, and it was particularly effective in 2nd or 3rd line where high rates of MR4.5 can be achieved. These results underscore the efficacy of ponatinib in these settings. Disclosures Sasaki: Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria. Ravandi:Jazz: Honoraria; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Orsenix: Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Abbvie: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Orsenix: Honoraria; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kadia:Takeda: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. DiNardo:Agios: Consultancy; Bayer: Honoraria; Medimmune: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Konopleva:Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding. Pemmaraju:stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; plexxikon: Research Funding; daiichi sankyo: Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Affymetrix: Research Funding; SagerStrong Foundation: Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding. Daver:ARIAD: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Kiromic: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy; ImmunoGen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy. Wierda:Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie, Inc: Research Funding. Jabbour:novartis: Research Funding. Cortes:novartis: Research Funding.

Bosutinib As Therapy for Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Following Failure with Imatinib Plus Dasatinib and/or Nilotinib: 24-Month Minimum Follow-up Update

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3785-3785 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Jean Khoury ◽  
Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
David Marin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3785 Bosutinib (BOS) is an orally active, dual Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). This open-label, phase 1/2 study evaluated BOS in patients (pts) with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP CML) following TKI failure. A total of 119 pts aged ≥18 y with prior imatinib (IM) failure plus dasatinib (DAS) resistance (n = 38), DAS intolerance (n = 50), nilotinib (NIL) resistance (n = 27), NIL intolerance (n = 1), or failure of DAS and NIL (n = 3) received BOS starting at 500 mg/d. Median age was 56 y (range, 20–79 y); 45% of pts were male; median time from CML diagnosis was 6.5 y (range, 0.6–18.3 y). Median BOS duration was 8.6 mo (range, 0.2–60.8 mo); 24% of pts are still on treatment. Dose escalation to BOS 600 mg/d occurred in 19% of pts. Time from last pt's first dose to data cutoff was 25 mo (median follow-up duration of 31.4 mo [range, 0.3–66.0 mo]). A confirmed complete hematologic response (CHR) was attained/maintained by 73% of evaluable pts (Table). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) probability of maintaining a CHR at 2 y was 67%. A major cytogenetic response (MCyR) was attained/maintained by 41%, including 32% with a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). Among evaluable pts without a baseline CCyR, 36% (n = 37/102) achieved a MCyR, including 28 (28%) with a CCyR. The KM probability of maintaining a MCyR at 2 y was 71%. Of 86 pts with baseline mutation status, 40 (47%) pts had 19 unique Bcr-Abl kinase domain mutations, including 7 (8%) pts with T315I. Responses were seen across mutations (75% CHR, 43% MCyR excluding T315I), including those conferring resistance to other TKIs; responses in pts with T315I were low (29% CHR; 14% MCyR). Nine of 37 pts evaluated at baseline and treatment discontinuation had ≥1 new mutation (V299L, n = 4; L248V, n = 2; T315I, n = 2; F359C, n = 1; G250E, n = 1); 8 of 9 pts had discontinued BOS due to disease progression or lack of efficacy. On-treatment transformation to accelerated phase CML occurred in 5 (4%) pts after 16 to 428 d on study; no pt transformed to blast phase CML. KM-estimated on-treatment progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 y was 75%; KM-estimated overall survival (OS) at 2 y was 84% (Table). There were 23 (19%) deaths on study, with 6 deaths occurring ≤30 d after the last BOS dose. Most deaths were due to disease progression (n = 10 [8%]) or an adverse event (AE; n = 10 [8%]; including 1 treatment-related death due to gastrointestinal bleeding). Three deaths were due to unknown cause ≥509 d after the last BOS dose. Non-hematologic treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) seen in ≥20% of pts (all grades; grade 3/4) included diarrhea (82%; 8%), nausea (49%; 1%), vomiting (40%; 1%), rash (27%; 3%), headache (26%; 3%), fatigue (24%; 1%), and abdominal pain (20%; 1%). The incidence of individual TEAEs was generally similar across groups regardless of prior TKI exposure. Diarrhea TEAEs were predominantly grade 1/2, first reported early during treatment (median time to first event of 1.5 d [range, 1–210 d]), and transient (median event duration of 2 d [range, 1–524 d]). The incidence of pleural effusion was highest among DAS-intolerant pts (n = 11 [22%], including 3 pts with grade 3 events); for 9 of 11 pts pleural effusion had been indicated as a reason for intolerance to prior DAS. Grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities reported in ≥10% of pts included thrombocytopenia (25%), neutropenia (19%), lymphopenia (17%), and hypermagnesemia (12%). Dose reductions and interruptions were used to manage AEs in 50% and 66% of pts. A total of 32 (27%) pts discontinued treatment due to an AE, most commonly hematologic events. In conclusion, BOS therapy continues to demonstrate durable efficacy and manageable toxicity after follow-up of ≥24 mo in CP CML following resistance or intolerance to multiple TKIs, with a majority of pts maintaining response at 2 y and few new transformations, deaths, TEAEs, or discontinuations due to AEs since the prior report ∼1 y earlier (Blood 2012;119:4303–12). n (%) IM + DAS-R IM + DAS-I IM + NIL-R IM + DAS ± NILa Total Evaluableb 37 49 25 4 115     CHR 23 (62) 39 (80) 19 (76) 3 (75) 84 (73) Evaluableb 36 44 26 4 110     MCyR 12 (33) 21 (48) 10 (39) 2 (50) 45 (41)     CCyR 7 (19) 19 (43) 7 (27) 2 (50) 35 (32) Treated 38 50 27 4 119     PFS at 2 yc 70% 81% 79% 38% 75%     OS at 2 yc 77% 85% 92% 75% 84% R, resistant; I, intolerant. a Includes 3 pts with prior exposure to all 3 TKIs and 1 NIL-I pt. KM rates may be unreliable due to the small number of pts in this cohort. b Received ≥1 dose of BOS and had a valid baseline response assessment. c Based on KM estimates Disclosures: Gambacorti-Passerini: Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis, Bristol Myer Squibb: Consultancy. Kantarjian:Pfizer: Research Funding. Kim:BMS, Novartis, Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Marin:Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Dorlhiac-Llacer:Novartis, Bristol Myer Squibb, Pfizer: Research Funding. Bullorsky:Novartis, BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Leip:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Kelly:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Turnbull:Pfizer Inc, l3/Inventiv Clinical Solutions: Employment. Besson:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Cortes:Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Ariad, Chemgenex: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Efficacy Of Different Therapeutic Approaches In Blastic Phase Of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Single Centre Experience

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5173-5173
Author(s):  
Elza Lomaia ◽  
Ekaterina Romanova ◽  
Larisa Girshova ◽  
Yulia Alexeeva ◽  
Eugenia Sbityakova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Advanced Phase ◽  
Blastic Phase

Abstract Dramatic changes in overall survival of patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) have occurred since tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were implemented in the treatment strategy. But there are still many issues in therapy of advanced phase disease, especially in blastic phase (BP). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is still the only curative option for CML BP, so all efforts should be focused on bringing pts to alloSCT. Thus optimal approach to obtain at least stable hematologic response before alloSCT is needed. Since 2008, 14 pts (4 more pts with isolated extramedullary BP were not included) with CML BP were admitted to our clinic. These were 8 males and 6 females with a median age of 44 years (range; 21-63) at the time of BP. The types of BP were: biphenotypic (n=1), undifferentiated (n=1), myeloid (n=8) and lymphoid (n=4). All pts except 2 (1 with BP and 1 with accelerated phase) were initially diagnosed as CP. Median time from diagnosis to BP was 37 months (range; 0-83). Before BP all pts except 2 were pretreated with imatinib and 6 of them, after failing imatinib, received one or more new TKIs. First line therapy in BP was monotherapy with new TKI (n=5) or chemotherapy (“7+3”, “RACOP”, low doses of Ara-C, “Hyper-CVAD”, “Dexa+VCR”) with or w/o TKI (n=9). Responses are specified in table 1. FLAG regimen was subsequently given to 5 pts as second or more line therapy after failure of previous monoTKI (n=1) or Rx + TKI (n=4). Median time from BP to FLAG was 3,5 months (range; 1,5-21). The best response to FLAG therapy was complete hematologic (n=1), complete cytogenetic with (n=1) or w/o (n=1) major molecular response. There were no responses in 2 cases. All responders maintain their response after median follow up (FU) of 2 months (range; 1,5-5). All patients treated with FLAG are alive (2 after alloSCT, 3 pending alloSCT). Only 1 ptn reached alloSCT w/o any Rx after monoTKI. AlloSCT was successful in 4/5. Median FU time for patients alive after alloSCT is 12 months (range; 3,5-25). For whole group after a median FU of 14 months, 7/14 (50%) pts are alive, including 4 pts after alloSCT. Estimated 3-year overall survival for all pts is 54% (fig. 1). Conclusion All CML BP patients treated with TKIs alone lost their response in a short time. Responses were much more durable in pts treated with Rx +/- TKIs. FLAG regimen was effective even in pts with failure to previous Rx+TKIs. The majority of pts after alloSCT are alive. Chemotherapy, including FLAG with concomitant or subsequent TKIs, had advantage over monoTKI both in overall and progression free survival in CML BP. Disclosures: Lomaia: Novartis: Honoraria, Travel grants Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Travel grants, Travel grants Other. Zaritskey:University of Heidelberg: Research Funding.

Efficacy of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Third Line Therapy in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4051-4051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elza Lomaia ◽  
Andrey Zaritskey ◽  
Vasily Shuvaev ◽  
Irina Martynkevich ◽  
Mikhail Fominykh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line

Abstract Introduction. Overall survival (OS) of patients in chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) dramatically increased in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Meanwhile nearly half of patients discontinue 1-st line Imatinib due to resistance or intolerance. Half of them subsequently failure treatment with second line TKI. It seems that 20-25% of CP CML patients need 3-d line therapy (TKI-3l). There are a few reports regarding durable outcome of TKI-3l. Materials and Methods. In our retrospective study 53 patients (20 male, 33 female) with CML CP treated either by Nilotinib 400 mg BID (n=18), Dasatinib 100 mg QD (n=33) or Bosutinib 500 mg QD (n=5) as TKI-3l were included. The median age at the time of diagnosis was 46 years (23-88 years). The main reason for previous TKIs discontinuation was resistance: 48/53 (91%) had failure of one and 42/53 (79%) patients had failure of both previous TKIs treatment. Median CML duration before TKI-3l was 55 months (2-314 months). Before TKI-3l mutation analysis was performed in 35 patients: 18 mutations were revealed in 16 (46%) patients including T315I mutation in 3 cases. At the moment of 3-d line TKIs therapy initiation, all patients were in CP and 43/53 (81%) had at least complete hematologic response (CHR), 8/53 (15%) patients had major cytogenetic response (MCyR) including 1 patient with complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). Results. At the time of analysis, the median duration of TKI-3l therapy was 21 months (1-67 months). No additional patients achieved CHR, but during observational time CHR was maintained nearly in all 40/43 (93%) patients with CHR at baseline. New cases of MCyR and CCyR were observed in 15/45(33%) and 11/52(21%) of patients, respectively. Median time to MCyR and CCyR was 3.4 (3-8) and 5.2 (3-13) months, respectively. Median duration of MCyR and CCyR was 9.3 (1-43) months and 4.5 (3-6) months, respectively. Patients with resistant mutations did not obtain any cytogenetic response. TKI-3l treatment was discontinued in 21 patients. Intolerance was the reason of treatment discontinuation in 5/53(10%) cases. Progression to accelerated or blastic phases during therapy or after discontinuation occurred in 8/53 (15%) patients. Median time to progression was 14.7 months (1-46 months). There were 13 deaths in overall group of 53 patients. Two-year OS in TKI-3l was 67%. All patients with MCyR were alive and preserved CP phase. Concluson: Our results showed that 20% of patients might obtain at least CCyR and benefit with TKIs as third line. Therefore, after two TKI lines patients, who are not eligible for allogeneic transplantation and without resistant mutations should be treated with one more line of TKI therapy. Disclosures Lomaia: Novartis: Consultancy. Zaritskey:University of Heidelberg: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Nilotinib is effective in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase after imatinib resistance or intolerance: 24-month follow-up results

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 1141-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Francis J. Giles ◽  
Kapil N. Bhalla ◽  
Javier Pinilla-Ibarz ◽  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Imatinib Resistance ◽  
Abl Tyrosine Kinase

Abstract Nilotinib is a potent selective inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase approved for use in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP), and in CML-CP and CML-accelerated phase after imatinib failure. Nilotinib (400 mg twice daily) was approved on the basis of the initial results of this phase 2 open-label study. The primary study endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving major cytogenetic response (CyR). All patients were followed for ≥ 24 months or discontinued early. Of 321 patients, 124 (39%) continue on nilotinib treatment. Overall, 59% of patients achieved major CyR; this was complete CyR (CCyR) in 44%. Of patients achieving CCyR, 56% achieved major molecular response. CyRs were durable, with 84% of patients who achieved CCyR maintaining response at 24 months. The overall survival at 24 months was 87%. Adverse events were mostly mild to moderate, generally transient, and easily managed. This study indicates that nilotinib is effective, with a manageable safety profile, and can provide favorable long-term benefits for patients with CML-CP after imatinib failure. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00109707.

Response and Outcomes to Nilotinib at 24 Months in Imatinib-Resistant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and Accelerated Phase (CML-AP) with and without BCR-ABL Mutations.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1130-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerald P. Radich ◽  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Enrico Gottardi ◽  
Simona Soverini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Imatinib Resistant

Abstract Abstract 1130 Poster Board I-152 Background Nilotinib is a selective and potent BCR-ABL inhibitor, with in vitro activity against most BCR-ABL mutants (excluding T315I) indicated for the treatment of patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) CML in CPor AP resistant or -intolerant to prior therapy, including imatinib. In a previous analysis of nilotinib in patients with BCR-ABL mutations, mutations occurring at three specific amino acid residues (E255K/V, Y253H, and F359C/V) were shown to be associated with less favorable response to nilotinib. The current analysis is based on mature data with a minimum follow-up of 24-months for all patients. Outcomes of patients at 24 months were analyzed by mutation type. Methods Imatinib-resistant CML-CP (n = 200) and CML-AP (n = 93) patients were subdivided into the following mutational subsets: no mutation, sensitive mutations (including mutations with unknown in vitro IC50). or E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations at baseline. Patients with mutations of unknown in vitro sensitivity were classified as sensitive in this analysis based on a previous finding that patients with these mutations responded similarly to nilotinib as patients with sensitive mutation. Patients with baseline T315I mutations were excluded from this analysis. Patient groups were analyzed for kinetics and durability of cytogenetic and molecular response to nilotinib, as well as event-free survival (EFS), defined as loss of hematologic or cytogenetic response, progression to AP/BC, discontinuation due to disease progression, or death, and overall survival (OS). Results In CML-CP and -AP patients with no mutation, sensitive mutations, or E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations, hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular responses are provided in the Table. Overall, patients with no mutations responded similarly to patients with sensitive mutations, whereas patients with E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations had less favorable responses. This correlation was observed in both CML-CP and CML-AP patients, respectively. Median time to CCyR was 3.3 months (range, 1.0–26.7) for CML-CP patients with no mutations, and 5.6 months (range, 0.9–22.1) for patients with sensitive mutations. At 24 months, CCyR was maintained in 74% of CML-CP patients with no mutation and in 84% of patients with sensitive mutations. One patient with CML-CP and an E255K mutation achieved CCyR at 25 months and maintained until last assessment at 30 months. Median time to MMR was similar at 5.6 months (range, 0.9–25.8) for CML-CP patients with no mutations and 5.6 months (range, 2.7–22.1) for patients with sensitive mutations. No patient with a less sensitive mutation achieved MMR. Median EFS and 24-month estimated OS rate are provided in the Table. Conclusions Imatinib-resistant CML-CP and CML-AP patients treated with nilotinib therapy with BCR-ABL mutations (excluding E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V) achieved rapid and durable cytogenetic responses, and estimated EFS and OS at 24 months similar to that of patients with no mutations, respectively. Patients with E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations had lower and less-durable responses and shorter EFS than patients with sensitive mutations. Alternative therapies may be considered for patients with these uncommon mutations (E255K/V, Y253H, and F359C/V). Disclosures Radich: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hochhaus:Novartis: Research Funding. Branford:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shou:Novartis: Employment. Haque:Novartis: Employment. Woodman:Novartis: Employment. Kantarjian:Novartis: Research Funding. Hughes:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kim:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Dasatinib Is Well-Tolerated and Efficacious in Imatinib-Intolerant Patients with Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1128-1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna Jean Khoury ◽  
Michael J. Mauro ◽  
Yousif Matloub ◽  
Tai-Tsang Chen ◽  
Erkut Bahceci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Molecular Response

Abstract Abstract 1128 Poster Board I-150 Imatinib (IM), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has been the mainstay of treatment for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). However, IM resistance and intolerance are of considerable clinical relevance. Dasatinib (DAS), a second-line TKI, is effective in the IM-intolerant patient population. The purpose of this study was to determine baseline factors that can affect DAS response and evaluate long term efficacy in this population. Intolerance to IM was defined as ≥ Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity and/or Grade 4 hematologic toxicity lasting > 7 days. A total of 271 Ph+ CP-CML IM-intolerant patients who received DAS were pooled from two randomized trials (Phase II-trial, CA 180013 and Phase III trial, CA 180034). DAS doses were 50 mg BID (n=43), 70 mg BID (n=141), 100 mg QD (n=43) or 140 mg QD (n=44). At baseline, the median duration of disease for the IM-intolerant patients was 24 months (range: 0.9-182.5) and the median duration of IM therapy was 9 months (range: 0.03-69.06). Of these patients, 46 (17%) had hematologic toxicity and 228 (84.1%) had non-hematologic toxicity to IM. Seventy-nine (29%) patients had prior complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) on IM and 171 (63%) patients did not. The data for prior CyR to IM was not reported for 21 (7.7%) patients. Of the 79 patients who had achieved CCyR on IM, 30 patients had maintained CCyR and 49 patients had lost this response prior to start of DAS. Of the 171 patients who did not achieve CCyR on IM, 62 (36.3%) had been on IM for 3 12 months and 109 (63.7%) for < 12 months. At 2-year follow up of the 271 patients treated with DAS, 121 (44.6%) discontinued DAS (7.4% due to hematologic toxicity and 14% due to non-hematologic toxicity). Of the patients who were intolerant of IM due to hematologic toxicity (n=46), 10 (21.7%) discontinued DAS due to hematologic toxicity, and 3 (6.5%) due to other toxicities. Of the patients with non-hematologic IM-intolerance (n=228), 10 (4.4%) discontinued DAS due to hematologic toxicity, and 35 (15.4%) due to other toxicities. The median average daily dose of DAS was 99 mg/day in the population who achieved CCyR on DAS and 71.5 mg/day in the population who did not achieve CCyR on DAS. The probability of achieving CCyR on DAS was 43.5% in patients with hematologic IM-intolerance versus 78.9% with non-hematologic IM-intolerance. The CCyR, major molecular response (MMR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 2-year follow up for the groups classified by their CCyR status at start of DAS or IM-intolerance status are summarized in Table 1. Conclusions DAS was well-tolerated and associated with high rates of CyR in IM-intolerant patients. Patients with a prior CCyR to IM and those who switched due to non-hematologic imatinib-intolerance had the highest rates of CCyR and MMR on DAS, while patients without CCyR after more than 12 months of IM therapy or IM-intolerance due to hematologic toxicity had the lowest rates of CCyR and MMR. Disclosures Khoury: BMS: Honoraria; Wyeth: Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Chemgenex: Honoraria; Genzyme: Honoraria. Mauro:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Matloub:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Chen:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Bahceci:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Deininger:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Calistoga: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding.

Results of Imatinib Dose Escalation After 36 Months of Follow-up in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Failure or Sub-Optimal Response According to 2006 EuropeanLeukemia Net (ELN) Criteria.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3302-3302
Author(s):  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Fabio Stagno ◽  
Roberto Latagliata ◽  
Paolo Vigneri ◽  
Laura Cannella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response

Abstract Abstract 3302 Poster Board III-190 Introduction Imatinib mesylate (IM) given at a daily dose of 400 mg currently represents the gold standard of care for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP). European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines propose IM dose escalation to rescue those CML patients with either suboptimal response or drug resistance. We report on the long-term efficacy of IM dose escalation in 74 patients with CP-CML after suboptimal response or failure to IM conventional dose. Patients and methods Median age was 50 years (range 19-85), there were 52 males and 22 females. Thirteen patients were classified as hematologic failure (10 primary and 3 secondary), 57 patients as cytogenetic resistance (24 primary and 33 acquired). Three patients escalated the dose for cytogenetic suboptimal response and one patient for molecular suboptimal response at 18 months. Fifty-four received IM dose escalation from 400 to 600 mg and 20 patients from 400 to 800 mg. Results Overall, after a median follow-up of 36 months, 68/74 (91.8%) patients maintained or achieved a complete haematologic response (CHR); this was maintained in all patients who escalated the dose for cytogenetic failure or suboptimal response. A major cytogenetic response (MCyR) was achieved in 41 patients (72%) who escalated the dose for cytogenetic failure and in 6/13 (46%) patients who escalated imatinib for hematologic failure (p=0.002). Overall, complete cytogenetic responses (CCR) were achieved in 27 (37%) out of 74 CML patients: of the 13 hematologic failure patients, only 5 achieved CCyR: all patients had prior acquired resistance to imatinib. Of the 57 cytogenetic failure, 22 reached CCR: this response was obtained in 27% of the primary cytogenetic resistant, and in 50% of the acquired cytogenetic resistant patients (p=0.02). Three patients who escalated the dose for cytogenetic suboptimal response obtained CCR and complete molecular response (CMR), whereas one patient who escalated the dose for molecular suboptimal response at 18 months did not obtain CMR. Median time to cytogenetic response was 3.5 months. Cytogenetic responses occurred in 37/50 patients who escalated the dose to 600 mg and in 10/20 patients who escalated to 800 mg daily (p=0.234). CMR was obtained in 10 patients: in 7 patients who escalated the dose for cytogenetic failure and in 3 patients who escalated imatinib for suboptimal cytogenetic response. Estimated 2 year-progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) is 87% and 85% respectively. Sixteen patients (21.6%) experienced toxicities and had temporarily IM interruption. Conclusions Imatinib dose escalation can induce sustained responses in a subset of patients with cytogenetic resistance and a prior suboptimal cytogenetic response to standard-dose imatinib, whereas it appears less effective in haematologic failure patients or in molecular sub-optimal responders. The availability of second generation TKI should be taken into account in these letter categories of patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Long Term Adherence to Imatinib Therapy Is the Critical Factor for Achieving Molecular Responses in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3290-3290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Bazeos ◽  
Jamshid Khorashad ◽  
François-Xavier Mahon ◽  
Lina L Eliasson ◽  
Dragana Milojkovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Imatinib Therapy ◽  
Adherence Rate ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
Adherence To Therapy

Abstract Abstract 3290 Poster Board III-1 There is a great variability in the degree of molecular responses achieved by chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with imatinib. These different levels of molecular response could reflect different degrees of adherence to therapy. We measured the adherence to imatinib therapy in 87 consecutive CML chronic phase patients who had received imatinib 400 mg day as first line therapy for a median of 59.7 months before enrolment (range 25–104) and therefore all them were in complete cytogenetic response. Adherence levels were monitored during a 3-month period using microelectronic monitoring devices (MEMS) and were related to levels of molecular response. MEMS consist of an electronic device fitted in the cap of a normal looking medication bottle that automatically records each time the bottle is opened. MEMS are considered as the ‘gold standard' for measuring adherence. We also measured the imatinib plasma level, the presence of TKD mutations and the following prognostic factors measured at diagnosis: hOCT1 transcripts level, polymorphism 1236C&gt;T in ABCB1, Sokal risk group, hemoglobin, leukocytes , BCR-ABL1 transcript type and BCR1-ABL1 ratio and demographic data. The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee and patients gave written informed consent to participate. The median adherence rate was 97.6% (range 22.6–103.8%). In 23 (26.4%) patients adherence was ≤90% (median 76%) and in 12 (13.8%) ≤80% (median 63%). We found a strong association between adherence rate (≤90% or &gt;90%) and the 6-year probability of major molecular response (MMR) (28.4% vs 94.5%, p&lt;0.0001) and complete molecular response (CMR) (0% vs 43.8%, p=0.002) (Fig 1). Multivariate analysis identified adherence (RR=11.7, p=0.001) and expression of the molecular transporter hOCT1, (RR=1.79, p=0.038) as the only independent predictors for MMR. Adherence was the sole independent predictor for CMR. No molecular responses were observed when the adherence was ≤20% (p=0.0001). In patients whose imatinib dose had been increased (n=32) the adherence was poor (median 86.4%). Adherence was the only independent predictor for failure to achieve a 3-log transcript reduction (RR=17.66, p=0.006) in this subgroup of patients. Patients with CML vary greatly in their response, as demonstrated originally by Sokal et al. in 1984, and the same variation is seen in patients treated with imatinib in the modern era. The basis for this variation is unknown but it has been attributed to the intrinsic biological heterogeneity of the leukemia. In contrast we show here that adherence to therapy is the major factor determining the degree of response that a CML patient treated with imatinib will achieve. Disclosures: Mahon: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Apperley:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rezvani:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Marin:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Distinct Characteristics of e13a2 versus e14a2 BCR-ABL Chronic Myeloid Leukemia under Upfront Treatment with Imatinib – an Analysis of the German CML Study IV,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3773-3773
Author(s):  
Benjamin Hanfstein ◽  
Philipp Erben ◽  
Susanne Saussele ◽  
Michael Lauseker ◽  
Ulrike Proetel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Fusion Gene ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
White Blood Cells ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 3773 Introduction: The vast majority of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients express a BCR-ABL fusion gene mRNA encoding a 210 kDa tyrosine kinase which is constitutively activated and hence the mainspring of leukemic transformation. Two typical mRNA variants exist that differ in the presence or absence of the 75 basepair BCR exon 14: the e13a2 (lacking exon 14, also known as “b2a2”) and the e14a2 BCR-ABL transcript (“b3a2”). The significance of the additional 25 amino acid residues of the e14a2 BCR-ABL oncoprotein was extensively studied in the pre-imatinib era. However, the influence of the BCR-ABL transcript variant on the individual disease phenotype and outcome remained controversial and is still undefined in the imatinib era. Patients and methods: A total of 1,104 patients (median age 52 years, range 16–85, 40% female) expressing typical BCR-ABL transcript types (e13a2, n=447; e14a2, n=491; e13a2 and e14a2, n=166) were included in the randomized German CML study IV and treated with an imatinib based therapy consisting of imatinib 400 mg, imatinib 800 mg and combinations of standard dose imatinib with interferon alpha and low-dose cytarabine. The type of BCR-ABL transcript was defined by multiplex PCR. BCR-ABL expression was determined by quantitative RT-PCR and standardized according to the international scale (IS). Cytogenetic response was determined by conventional metaphase analyses. Response landmarks were defined according to European LeukemiaNet criteria, MR4 was defined as BCR-ABL IS ≤ 0.01% Results: No differences regarding age, sex and Euro risk were observed. A significant difference was observed comparing white blood cells (90,400/μl vs. 69,100/μl, p<0.001) and platelets (293,000/μl vs. 424,000/μl, p<0.001) at diagnosis (median, e13a2 vs. e14a2, respectively) indicating a distinct phenotype. No significant difference was observed regarding spleen size, basophils, eosinophils, blasts or adverse events under imatinib. Molecular response as determined by a transcript independent quantitative PCR assay was superior in e14a2 patients as compared to e13a2 patients (median time to major molecular response, MMR 1.5 years vs. 1.2 years, p<0.001; median time to MR4 4.2 years vs. 2.5 years, p<0.001). No difference was observed with regard to the achievement of a complete cytogenetic remission (CCyR). The superior molecular response rate of e14a2 patients did not translate into differences in progression free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Conclusion: Distinct initial blood counts suggest a different phenotype of e13a2 and e14a2 driven CML. MMR and MR4 are achieved earlier by e14a2 patients whereas no difference was observed with regard to PFS and OS. Disclosures: Schnittger: Münchner Leukämie Labor: Equity Ownership. Haferlach:Münchner Leukämie Labor: Equity Ownership. German CML Study Group:Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMBF: Research Funding; EU: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Essex: Research Funding.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety Of Dasatinib For Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase In Japan

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1493-1493
Author(s):  
Kohei Yamaguchi ◽  
Kazunori Murai ◽  
Shigeki Ito ◽  
Tomoaki Akagi ◽  
Kazuei Ogawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Once Daily

Abstract Background Dasatinib is a second-generation BCR-ABL inhibitor that has a 325-fold higher potency than imatinib and a 16-fold higher potency than nilotinib in vitro. The previous report from the global DASISION trial showed dasatinib resulted in significantly higher and faster rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) compared with imatinib. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dasatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) in Japan. Methods Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were include in this study. Patients received dasatinib 100mg once daily. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months. MMR defined as a BCR-ABL transcript level of 0.1% or lower on the International scale by means of a real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in peripheral blood. Secondary end points were the rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) by 12 months, the rate of MR4.5 (either (i) detectable disease with <0.0032% BCR-ABL1 IS or (ii) undetectable disease in cDNA with >32,000 ABL1 transcripts in the same volume of cDNA used to test for BCR-ABL1) by 12 months and adverse events of dasatinib (UMIN #000006358). Results Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were included in this study. All except one patient administered dasatinib 100 mg once daily. One patient was withdrawal before administration of dasatinib. So far, there were 71 patients with 6 months follow-up and 51 patients with 12 months follow-up. The estimated MMR rates were 69.5 % (95%CI, 58.7-80.3 %) by 6 months and 82.7% (95%CI, 73.0-92.4 %) by 12 months. The estimated MR4.5 rates were 27.1 % (95%CI, 16.7-37.5 %) by 6 months and 48.9% (95%CI, 36.0-61.7 %) by 12 months. Only 6 patients were withdrawal because of adverse event (5 patients) and ineffectiveness (1 patient). Conclusion Dasatinib treatment results in higher rates of molecular responses in newly diagnosed CML-CP patients in Japan. Dasatinib as the first-line agent might be acceptable for CML-CP patients because of better clinical efficacy and less toxicity. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document