Efficacy Of Different Therapeutic Approaches In Blastic Phase Of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Single Centre Experience

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5173-5173
Author(s):  
Elza Lomaia ◽  
Ekaterina Romanova ◽  
Larisa Girshova ◽  
Yulia Alexeeva ◽  
Eugenia Sbityakova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Advanced Phase ◽  
Blastic Phase

Abstract Dramatic changes in overall survival of patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) have occurred since tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were implemented in the treatment strategy. But there are still many issues in therapy of advanced phase disease, especially in blastic phase (BP). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is still the only curative option for CML BP, so all efforts should be focused on bringing pts to alloSCT. Thus optimal approach to obtain at least stable hematologic response before alloSCT is needed. Since 2008, 14 pts (4 more pts with isolated extramedullary BP were not included) with CML BP were admitted to our clinic. These were 8 males and 6 females with a median age of 44 years (range; 21-63) at the time of BP. The types of BP were: biphenotypic (n=1), undifferentiated (n=1), myeloid (n=8) and lymphoid (n=4). All pts except 2 (1 with BP and 1 with accelerated phase) were initially diagnosed as CP. Median time from diagnosis to BP was 37 months (range; 0-83). Before BP all pts except 2 were pretreated with imatinib and 6 of them, after failing imatinib, received one or more new TKIs. First line therapy in BP was monotherapy with new TKI (n=5) or chemotherapy (“7+3”, “RACOP”, low doses of Ara-C, “Hyper-CVAD”, “Dexa+VCR”) with or w/o TKI (n=9). Responses are specified in table 1. FLAG regimen was subsequently given to 5 pts as second or more line therapy after failure of previous monoTKI (n=1) or Rx + TKI (n=4). Median time from BP to FLAG was 3,5 months (range; 1,5-21). The best response to FLAG therapy was complete hematologic (n=1), complete cytogenetic with (n=1) or w/o (n=1) major molecular response. There were no responses in 2 cases. All responders maintain their response after median follow up (FU) of 2 months (range; 1,5-5). All patients treated with FLAG are alive (2 after alloSCT, 3 pending alloSCT). Only 1 ptn reached alloSCT w/o any Rx after monoTKI. AlloSCT was successful in 4/5. Median FU time for patients alive after alloSCT is 12 months (range; 3,5-25). For whole group after a median FU of 14 months, 7/14 (50%) pts are alive, including 4 pts after alloSCT. Estimated 3-year overall survival for all pts is 54% (fig. 1). Conclusion All CML BP patients treated with TKIs alone lost their response in a short time. Responses were much more durable in pts treated with Rx +/- TKIs. FLAG regimen was effective even in pts with failure to previous Rx+TKIs. The majority of pts after alloSCT are alive. Chemotherapy, including FLAG with concomitant or subsequent TKIs, had advantage over monoTKI both in overall and progression free survival in CML BP. Disclosures: Lomaia: Novartis: Honoraria, Travel grants Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Travel grants, Travel grants Other. Zaritskey:University of Heidelberg: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia after Treatment with Multiple Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1542
Author(s):  
Jee Hyun Kong ◽  
Elliott F. Winton ◽  
Leonard T. Heffner ◽  
Manila Gaddh ◽  
Brittany Hill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Blastic Phase

We sought to evaluate the outcomes of chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in an era where five tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are commercially available for the treatment of CML. Records of patients diagnosed with CP CML, treated with TKIs and referred to our center were reviewed. Between January 2005 and April 2016, 206 patients were followed for a median of 48.8 (1.4–190.1) months. A total of 76 (37%) patients received one TKI, 73 (35%) received two TKIs and 57 (28%) were exposed to >3 TKIs (3 TKIs, n = 33; 4 TKIs, n = 17; 5 TKIs, n = 7). Nineteen (9.2%) patients progressed to advanced phases of CML (accelerated phase, n = 6; myeloid blastic phase, n = 4; lymphoid blastic phase, n = 9). One third (n = 69) achieved complete molecular response (CMR) at first-line treatment. An additional 55 patients achieved CMR after second-line treatment. Twenty-five patients (12.1%) attempted TKI discontinuation and 14 (6.8%) stopped TKIs for a median of 6.3 months (range 1–53.4). The 10-year progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates were 81% and 87%, respectively. OS after 10-years, based on TKI exposure, was 100% (1 TKI), 82% (2 TKIs), 87% (3 TKIs), 75% (4 TKIs) and 55% (5 TKIs). The best OS was observed in patients tolerating and responding to first line TKI, but multiple TKIs led patients to gain treatment-free remission.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Ponatinib after Multiple Lines of Therapy for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3013-3013
Author(s):  
Mahesh Swaminathan ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Koji Sasaki ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Abstract Background: Ponatinib, a third-generation pan-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), was found to be effective in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). With the availability of multiple TKI, these agents are used in different sequences, and there is limited information on the value of various TKI in different lines of therapy. Since ponatinib has been effective in 3rd and subsequent lines of therapy, we performed an analysis of a cohort of pts with CML who received ponatinib as a different line of treatment. Method: A total of 80 pts with chronic phase of CML and received ponatinib from 2009 to 2018 were analyzed. Only pts who received ponatinib as a second or subsequent line of therapy of CML were included. Major cytogenetic response (MCyR), complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR), molecular response (MR) 4, and MR 4.5 were assessed. Event-free (EFS), transformation-free (TFS), failure-free (FFS) and overall survival (OS) were also analyzed. Results: Nine pts (11%) received ponatinib as a 2nd line therapy (prior TKI imatinib in 6, dasatinib in 1, and nilotinib in 2 pts); 21 (26%) as a 3rd line, 26 (33%) as a 4th line, and 24 (30%) as a 5th and above line. The median age was over 50 years (Y) in all the groups except for pts who received ponatinib as a 3rd line [38 Y (23-76)]. Among pts who received ponatinib as 2nd line, 9 (100%) achieved CCyR and MR 4.5; the median time to achieve CCyR and MR 4.5 was 3 and 6.8 months (mo), respectively (Table 1). In pts treated in 3rd line CCyR and MR 4.5 were 67% and 57%, respectively and the median time to response was 4.8 and 19.3 mo, respectively. Of the 26 pts treated in 4th line, 13 (50%) achieved CCyR (median time to CCyR 3 mo) and 7 (27%) achieved MR 4.5 (median time 11.6 mo). In 5th line and above 14 (58%) achieved CCyR (median time 6.4 mo) and 8 (33%) achieved MR 4.5 (median time 12.3 mo) (Figure 1). After a median follow-up of 59.8 months (range, 4.7 to 114.3) for all pts, the median OS was not reached in pts treated in 2nd to 4th line and 81.4 mo in ≥5th line. The median FFS was not reached in 2nd line, and was 45.6, 20.2, and 17.8 mo in 3rd, 4th, and ≥5th line, respectively. The median EFS and TFS was not reached in any line of treatment. The TFS was significantly better in pts who received ponatinib as a 2nd-4th line therapy as compared to ≥5th [p=0.0026, HR-55.97 (4.076-768.7)] (Figure 2). Conclusion: Our results suggest that CCyR and MR 4.5 were higher when ponatinib was used in up to 4th line of therapy for resistant CML, and it was particularly effective in 2nd or 3rd line where high rates of MR4.5 can be achieved. These results underscore the efficacy of ponatinib in these settings. Disclosures Sasaki: Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria. Ravandi:Jazz: Honoraria; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Orsenix: Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Abbvie: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Orsenix: Honoraria; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kadia:Takeda: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. DiNardo:Agios: Consultancy; Bayer: Honoraria; Medimmune: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Konopleva:Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding. Pemmaraju:stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; plexxikon: Research Funding; daiichi sankyo: Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Affymetrix: Research Funding; SagerStrong Foundation: Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding. Daver:ARIAD: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Kiromic: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy; ImmunoGen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy. Wierda:Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie, Inc: Research Funding. Jabbour:novartis: Research Funding. Cortes:novartis: Research Funding.

Efficacy of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Third Line Therapy in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4051-4051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elza Lomaia ◽  
Andrey Zaritskey ◽  
Vasily Shuvaev ◽  
Irina Martynkevich ◽  
Mikhail Fominykh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line

Abstract Introduction. Overall survival (OS) of patients in chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) dramatically increased in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Meanwhile nearly half of patients discontinue 1-st line Imatinib due to resistance or intolerance. Half of them subsequently failure treatment with second line TKI. It seems that 20-25% of CP CML patients need 3-d line therapy (TKI-3l). There are a few reports regarding durable outcome of TKI-3l. Materials and Methods. In our retrospective study 53 patients (20 male, 33 female) with CML CP treated either by Nilotinib 400 mg BID (n=18), Dasatinib 100 mg QD (n=33) or Bosutinib 500 mg QD (n=5) as TKI-3l were included. The median age at the time of diagnosis was 46 years (23-88 years). The main reason for previous TKIs discontinuation was resistance: 48/53 (91%) had failure of one and 42/53 (79%) patients had failure of both previous TKIs treatment. Median CML duration before TKI-3l was 55 months (2-314 months). Before TKI-3l mutation analysis was performed in 35 patients: 18 mutations were revealed in 16 (46%) patients including T315I mutation in 3 cases. At the moment of 3-d line TKIs therapy initiation, all patients were in CP and 43/53 (81%) had at least complete hematologic response (CHR), 8/53 (15%) patients had major cytogenetic response (MCyR) including 1 patient with complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). Results. At the time of analysis, the median duration of TKI-3l therapy was 21 months (1-67 months). No additional patients achieved CHR, but during observational time CHR was maintained nearly in all 40/43 (93%) patients with CHR at baseline. New cases of MCyR and CCyR were observed in 15/45(33%) and 11/52(21%) of patients, respectively. Median time to MCyR and CCyR was 3.4 (3-8) and 5.2 (3-13) months, respectively. Median duration of MCyR and CCyR was 9.3 (1-43) months and 4.5 (3-6) months, respectively. Patients with resistant mutations did not obtain any cytogenetic response. TKI-3l treatment was discontinued in 21 patients. Intolerance was the reason of treatment discontinuation in 5/53(10%) cases. Progression to accelerated or blastic phases during therapy or after discontinuation occurred in 8/53 (15%) patients. Median time to progression was 14.7 months (1-46 months). There were 13 deaths in overall group of 53 patients. Two-year OS in TKI-3l was 67%. All patients with MCyR were alive and preserved CP phase. Concluson: Our results showed that 20% of patients might obtain at least CCyR and benefit with TKIs as third line. Therefore, after two TKI lines patients, who are not eligible for allogeneic transplantation and without resistant mutations should be treated with one more line of TKI therapy. Disclosures Lomaia: Novartis: Consultancy. Zaritskey:University of Heidelberg: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Meta-Analysis of Gastrointestinal Adverse Events from Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1643
Author(s):  
Prahathishree Mohanavelu ◽  
Mira Mutnick ◽  
Nidhi Mehra ◽  
Brandon White ◽  
Sparsh Kudrimoti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Gastrointestinal Adverse Events

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the frontline therapy for BCR-ABL (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). A systematic meta-analysis of 43 peer-reviewed studies with 10,769 CML patients compared the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events (GI AEs) in a large heterogeneous CML population as a function of TKI type. Incidence and severity of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were assessed for imatinib, dasatinib, bosutinib, and nilotinib. Examination of combined TKI average GI AE incidence found diarrhea most prevalent (22.5%), followed by nausea (20.6%), and vomiting (12.9%). Other TKI GI AEs included constipation (9.2%), abdominal pain (7.6%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (3.5%), and pancreatitis (2.2%). Mean GI AE incidence was significantly different between TKIs (p < 0.001): bosutinib (52.9%), imatinib (24.2%), dasatinib (20.4%), and nilotinib (9.1%). Diarrhea was the most prevalent GI AE with bosutinib (79.2%) and dasatinib (28.1%), whereas nausea was most prevalent with imatinib (33.0%) and nilotinib (13.2%). Incidence of grade 3 or 4 severe GI AEs was ≤3% except severe diarrhea with bosutinib (9.5%). Unsupervised clustering revealed treatment efficacy measured by the complete cytogenetic response, major molecular response, and overall survival is driven most by disease severity, not TKI type. For patients with chronic phase CML without resistance, optimal TKI selection should consider TKI AE profile, comorbidities, and lifestyle.

scholarly journals A Retrospective Analysis about Frequency of Monitoring in Italian Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients after Discontinuation

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 3692
Author(s):  
Matteo Dragani ◽  
Giovanna Rege Cambrin ◽  
Paola Berchialla ◽  
Irene Dogliotti ◽  
Gianantonio Rosti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Molecular Monitoring ◽  
Delay In Diagnosis ◽  
Number Of Patients

Successful discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has been achieved in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Careful molecular monitoring after discontinuation warrants safe and prompt resumption of therapy. We retrospectively evaluated how molecular monitoring has been conducted in Italy in a cohort of patients who discontinued tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment per clinical practice. The outcome of these patients has recently been reported—281 chronic-phase CML patients were included in this subanalysis. Median follow-up since discontinuation was 2 years. Overall, 2203 analyses were performed, 17.9% in the first three months and 38.4% in the first six months. Eighty-six patients lost major molecular response (MMR) in a mean time of 5.7 months—65 pts (75.6%) during the first six months. We evaluated the number of patients who would experience a delay in diagnosis of MMR loss if a three-month monitoring schedule was adopted. In the first 6 months, 19 pts (29.2%) would have a one-month delay, 26 (40%) a 2-month delay. Very few patients would experience a delay in the following months. A less intense frequency of monitoring, particularly after the first 6 months off treatment, would not have affected the success of treatment-free remission (TFR) nor put patients at risk of progression.

Recurrent bone marrow aplasia secondary to nilotinib in a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia: A case report

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 440-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prathima Prodduturi ◽  
Anamarija M Perry ◽  
Patricia Aoun ◽  
Dennis D Weisenburger ◽  
Mojtaba Akhtari
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Bone Marrow Aplasia ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

Nilotinib is a potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor of breakpoint cluster region-abelson (BCR-ABL), which has been approved as front-line therapy for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase and as second-line therapy after imatinib failure in chronic or accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been associated with myelosuppression and grade 3 or grade 4 cytopenias are not uncommon in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with these drugs. There are a few reports of imatinib-associated bone marrow aplasia, but to our knowledge only one reported case of bone marrow aplasia associated with nilotinib. Herein, we report a 49-year-old male patient with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia, who developed severe bone marrow aplasia due to nilotinib. Possible mechanisms for this significant adverse drug reaction are discussed along with a review of literature.

Molecular Response to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML), the Experience At Tawam Hospital, Abudhabi, UAE

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4458-4458
Author(s):  
Arif Alam ◽  
Sabir Hussain ◽  
Amar Lal ◽  
Donna Lee ◽  
Jorgen Kristensen
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Technique ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Female Ratio

Abstract Abstract 4458 Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) is a clonal myeloproliferative disorder characterized by the presence of a balanced reciprocal translocation involving the long arms of chromosomes 9 and 22. The fusion gene that is created by this translocation (BCR-ABL1) encodes for a constitutively active protein tyrosine kinase that is primarily responsible for the leukemic phenotype. Targeted therapy with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) has become the recommended first-line treatment for patients with CML. Monitoring of the CML is done with quantification of the BCR-ABL transcripts by RQ-PCR–based molecular technique. Twenty nine patients were diagnosed with CML in chronic phase between January 2009 till June 2012. The median age was 32 years (range 22–68 years). Male to female ratio was4.14:1. Three patients were lost from follow up after diagnosis and are excluded. Molecular response is available for 16 patients. Nine patients were treated with Imatinib 400 mg daily, four with Dasatinib 100 mg daily and three with Nilotinib 400 mg BID daily as upfront therapy. Twelve patients have achieved MMR/CMR (75 %) within 18months of starting therapy. Four patients have failed to achieve MMR by 24 months. All non responders were on Imatinib. Interestingly six (37.5%) patients achieved MMR/CMR within 9 months of starting TKIs. Of these only 1 was on Imatinib while the rest were on 2nd generation TKIs (Nilotinib 3 and Dasatinib 2). MMR report from Enestnd trial is 67–71% in favor of Nilotinib as compared to Imatinib 44%, while the Dasision trial reported a MMR of 44 % in favor of Dasatinib with faster rate to response. Our results mirror the results of these phase 3 randomized trial with MMR/CMR of 75 %. Until today there has been no case of progressive disease. Our data is limited but shows that the median age is much lower compared to Western countries, just reflecting differences in the age distribution of the population in the UAE with 80% being below the age of 65 years. Expatriates accounts for approximately 80% of the population in the UAE and many are temporary employed, having limited health care coverage, limited financial means as well as limited possibilities to attend regular follow-ups. This leads to compliance problems, loss from follow-up and suboptimal management and monitoring of their disease. Disclosures: Alam: BMS/Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hussain:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals The HIGH BCR-ABL1 GENE PERCENTAGE AT TIME OF PRESENTATION: A TOOL TO PREDICT FAILURE IN ACHIEVING EARLY MOLECULAR RESPONSE IN CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA (CML): A TERTIARY CARE CENTER EXPERIENCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (Suppl-1) ◽  
pp. S71-75
Author(s):  
Amjad Khan ◽  
Riaz Ahmed ◽  
Sarah Fatimah ◽  
Muhammad Nadeem ◽  
Shama Iqbal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Imatinib Therapy ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Number Of Patients

Objective: To determine the relationship of baseline quantitative BCR ABL1 gene percentage and therapeutic response i.e. Early Molecular Response (EMR) at 3 months with first generation Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Imatinib) in patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP). Study Design: Prospective observational study. Place and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, and Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Rawalpindi, Pakistan from Oct 2017 to Oct 2019. Methodology: One hundred and seventy patients, 18 years of age or older with newly diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) with quantitative baseline BCR-ABL (IS) transcript were included in the study. All enrolled patients were placed on Imatinib therapy (400 mg/day) and Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for BCR ABL transcript was repeated at 3 months to document EMR (BCR-ABL (IS) <10%). Patients who were in accelerated/blast phase, or already taking any Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) or chemotherapy were excluded from the study. Results: In our study 101 (59.4%) patients achieved early molecular response. Out of these 80 (70.8%) patients with BCR-ABL<50% at baseline value showed early molecular response. However, only 21 (36.8%) with BCRABL >50% at baseline achieved early molecular response (p-value <0.001). Conclusion: A significant number of patients achieved early molecular response with Imatinib therapy that had BCR ABL below 50%, however those with baseline BCR ABL >50%, the rate of EMR was comparatively lower.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of Bosutinib in Patient with Chronic myeloid leukemia who was intolerant to DASTANIB,NILOTUNIB -Case report

2021 ◽  
pp. 225
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Symptomatic Treatment ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Toxicity Profile ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Major Molecular Response

Treatment for Chronic myeloid leukemia has been revolutionized because of availability of different tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Each TKI come with its on toxicity profile as this needs to be taken in account before starting therapy with particular agent in a patient. Most of the adverse effects related to TKI are mild and can be managed by either symptomatic treatment or either by dose reduction. But some patients can become intolerant and to switch to other TKI remains the only option. Bosutinib is currently approved for treatment of chronic phase CML in patients who are either resistant or intolerant to previous TKI. We present a case of 59 year old male patient with CML who was intolerant to Dastanib and Nilotinib but showed excellent hematological and major molecular response to bosutinib

scholarly journals The Use of Statin Enhances Chance of Achieving MR4.5 in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Chronic Phase Following Imatinib Therapy

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1804-1804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Dong Hwan Kim ◽  
Feras Alfraih ◽  
Honggi Lee ◽  
Jeffrey H. Lipton
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Statin Group ◽  
Tki Discontinuation

Abstract BACKGROUND: HMG-CoA reducatase inhibitors, or statins, are commonly prescribed medications which improve life expectancy in general population. They are known to improve hypercholesterolemia and decrease the incidence of cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction or stroke, but also suggested for cancer prevention even though the mechanism is not fully elucidated. Recent studies emphasized the potential role of statins in the cancer treatment to increase response rate to chemotherapy and to improve survival of cancer patients. Statin family of drugs is known to trigger tumor specific apoptosis and to result in growth arrest in leukemias (Penn, Leukemia 2002). The promising result of STIM (STop Imatinb) trial suggested that successful discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is possible when patients attain deeper molecular response (defined as 4.5 log reduction or deeper) for 2 years or longer. However, with our current knowledge, there is no known additive intervention facilitates the achievement of MR4.5. We hypothesized that the use of statin improves response rate to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), thus increasing MR4.5 achievement and increasing the chance of being attempted TKI discontinuation. METHODS: A total of 503 patients treated with TKI for CML treatment were initially evaluated for the response to TKI therapy with respect to complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR) and molecular response at 4.5 (MR4.5) and statin use. The inclusion criteria confined the patients with chronic phase (CP) treated with imatinib at the dose of 400mg daily, thus excluding 95 patients. Finally, 408 patients were entered into the final analysis. The statin group was defined as those on statin for cholesterol control at the time of imatinib commencement and remaining on statin while on at least 3 years or longer. Cumulative incidence method considering competing risk was adopted to calculate the incidences of MCyR, CCyR, MMR and MR4.5. Discontinuation of imatinib was accounted as competing risk in the analysis. Treatment failure, progression free- and overall survival was also evaluated. RESULTS: With a median follow-up duration of 6 years (range 3 months to 14 years), 88 patients (21.3%) were defined as “statin” group. Types of statin includes atorvastatin (n=44, 50%), rosuvastatin (n=26, 30%), simvastatin (n=10, 11%), pravastatin (n=6, 7%) and fluvastatin (n=2, 2%). The MCyR and CCyR achievement was not significantly different between the 2 groups (p=0.769 for MCyR and p=0.091 for CCyR). No difference of CCyR at 12 months was noted: 70.1% in statin vs 62.8% in non-statin group. The statin group showed a higher response rate than non-statin group for MMR (p=0.005) and MR4.5 (p=0.001): 67.3% vs 49.2% for MMR at 18 months; 55.8% vs 41.0% for MR4.5 at 5 years (Figure). Multivariate analysis was successful to confirm the use of statin as an independent clinical factor for improving MR4.5 (HR 1.785, 95% CI [1.260-2.530], p=0.001), but other clinical factors were not identified such as Sokal risk, age, gender or additional cytogenetic abnormalities (ACAs) at presentation. For MMR, the use of statin was also confirmed as independent factor for MMR (HR 1.541 95% [1.015-2.341], p=0.043) in addition to ACAs (HR 0.381, p=0.0038) and high sokal risk (HR 0.687, p=0.042). The use of statin was not found to be associated with improvement in treatment failure (p=0.580), progression free survival (p=0.731) or overall survival (p=0.542) in the present study. CONCLUSION: The use of statin suggested to improve deeper molecular response following imatinib therapy in CML-CP patients, therefore is promising to increase chance of attempt to TKI discontinuation. Statin appears to improve the chance of MR4.5 achievement by 78.5%. Careful interpretation is required and replication study in an independent cohort is strongly warranted to reach a clear conclusion on this promising effect of statin. The use of statin to deepen the molecular response of TKI therapy should be evaluated in the context of clinical trial. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document