scholarly journals Hottip Lncrna Reinforces CTCF Defined Chromatin Boundaries and Drives Wnt Target Gene Expression in AML Leukemogenesis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 277-277
Author(s):  
Huacheng Luo ◽  
Ganqian Zhu ◽  
Tsz Kan Fung ◽  
Yi Qiu ◽  
Mingjiang Xu ◽  
...  

We reported recently that HOXA locus associated lncRNA, HOTTIP, is highly expressed in AML patients carrying MLL rearrangement and NPM1c+ mutations. The expression of HOTTIP positively correlates with posterior HOXA gene expression and poor patient survival. We further demonstrated that HOTTIP acts as an epigenetic regulator to define oncogenic HOXA topologically associated domain (TAD) and drive HOXA associated leukemic transcription program. However, it remains unclear whether and how HOTTIP lncRNA is involved in remodeling leukemic genome to facilitate AML leukemogenesis. Here, we showed that HOTTIP regulates a fraction of CTCF binding sites (CBSs) in the AML genome by directly interacting with CTCF and its binding motifs. We carried out CTCF ChIP-seq and HOTTIP ChIRP (chromatin isolation by RNA purification)-seq comparing WT and HOTTIP knockout (KO) MOLM13 cells. KO of HOTTIP in MLL-rearranged MOLM13 AML cells specifically impaired CTCF binding sites that were co-occupied by HOTTIP lncRNA, whereas loss of HOTTIP did not affect global CTCF binding. These target genes include posterior HOXA genes and Wnt target genes such as C-MYC, EVI1, AXIN, and TWIST1. Furthermore, we found that HOTTIP interacts with its putative target sites by formation of DNA: RNA hybridization structure triple helix and R-loop in vivo and in vitro. We then carried out DRIP (DNA-RNA immunoprecipitation)-seq and DRIPc(DNA-RNA immunoprecipitation followed by cDNA conversion)-Seq, which utilize a sequence independent but structure-specific S9.6 antibody for DRIP to capture global R-loops, by comparing WT and HOTTIP KO MOLM13 cells. The obtained DRIP-seq and DRIPc-seq data were then incorporated and integrated with the HOTTIP ChIRP-seq and CTCF ChIP-seq data to explore global collaboration between R-loop and HOTTIP associated CTCF binding sites. We found that HOTTIP interacts with CTCF binding motif that defines the TADs and the promoters of the HOTTIP target genes by formation of R-loop or triple helix structure. Loss of HOTTIP disrupted the R-loop formation at promoters and enhancers of the HOTTIP target genes to inhibit their expression. In MLL-rearranged AML genome, in addition to the HOXA locus, CTCF forms leukemic specific TADs that protect aberrant Wnt target genes. Depletion of HOTTIP lncRNA impaired CTCF defined TADs in the Wnt target gene loci and reduced Wnt target gene expression. In contrast, overexpression of Hottip lncRNA (Hottip-Tg) in the mice bone marrow hematopoietic compartment perturbs hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) self-renewal and differentiation leading to AML like disease by reinforcing CTCF defined TADs, enhancing chromatin accessibility within TADs, and upregulating gene transcription in the Wnt target loci. Finally, when we treated HOTTIP expressed primary patient AML cells carrying MLL-rearrangement and their derived PDX mouse model with a canonical Wnt inhibitor, ICG-001, ICG-001 inhibited AML LSC self-renewal in in vitro by LTC-IC assays and in vivo leukemogenesis in the PDX mouse models with an aberrant HOTTIP lncRNA expression, but not in HOTTIP negative/low non-MLL AML samples. Thus, HOTTIP lncRNA and CTCF cooperate to specifically reinforce CTCF defined WNT target locus TADs and drive Wnt target gene expression in the HOTTIP expressed AML. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (16) ◽  
pp. 3607-3616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Chen ◽  
J.R. Cardinaux ◽  
R.H. Goodman ◽  
S.M. Smolik

Hedgehog (HH) is an important morphogen involved in pattern formation during Drosophila embryogenesis and disc development. cubitus interruptus (ci) encodes a transcription factor responsible for transducing the hh signal in the nucleus and activating hh target gene expression. Previous studies have shown that CI exists in two forms: a 75 kDa proteolytic repressor form and a 155 kDa activator form. The ratio of these forms, which is regulated positively by hh signaling and negatively by PKA activity, determines the on/off status of hh target gene expression. In this paper, we demonstrate that the exogenous expression of CI that is mutant for four consensus PKA sites [CI(m1-4)], causes ectopic expression of wingless (wg) in vivo and a phenotype consistent with wg overexpression. Expression of CI(m1-4), but not CI(wt), can rescue the hh mutant phenotype and restore wg expression in hh mutant embryos. When PKA activity is suppressed by expressing a dominant negative PKA mutant, the exogenous expression of CI(wt) results in overexpression of wg and lethality in embryogenesis, defects that are similar to those caused by the exogenous expression of CI(m1-4). In addition, we demonstrate that, in cell culture, the mutation of any one of the three serine-containing PKA sites abolishes the proteolytic processing of CI. We also show that PKA directly phosphorylates the four consensus phosphorylation sites in vitro. Taken together, our results suggest that positive hh and negative PKA regulation of wg gene expression converge on the regulation of CI phosphorylation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan Gallo ◽  
Lindsey S Treviño ◽  
Tiffany A Katz

Abstract Perinatal exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) has been shown to reprogram the hepatic epigenome of rodents and may promote the development of various metabolic diseases later in life, such as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This developmental reprogramming is characterized by the creation of “super promoters” at target genes implicated in metabolic pathways. While it is unclear how these “super promoters” are created, their creation is potentially mediated through BPA and estrogen receptor (ER) interaction. In order to test this potential mechanism, in vitro methods were used to examine ER target gene expression via RT-qPCR in 2 human hepatic cell lines transiently transfected with the ER isoform, ER alpha, prior to BPA exposure for various lengths of time. Within individual time points, there were no significant differences in target gene expression levels between cells that had been transfected with ER alpha and the vector control. Gene expression levels in the target genes were visibly increased at the 24-hour exposure mark in both transfection groups in comparison to the 0- and 6-hour time points, however only a fraction of these increases were found to be statistically significant. These gene expression patterns are not only consistent with previous studies examining target gene expression in BPA-treated hepatic cell lines, but more importantly, suggest BPA does not act via ER alpha to orchestrate the epigenetic changes seen in vitro. BPA may interact with a different ER isoform or an unknown target to create the observed “super promoters” at target genes, reinforcing the promiscuity of BPA and other xenoestrogens in facilitating epigenetic modifications, and ultimately, disease phenotypes.


1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 8219-8225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Asahara ◽  
Sanjoy Dutta ◽  
Hung-Ying Kao ◽  
Ronald M. Evans ◽  
Marc Montminy

ABSTRACT Homeobox (hox) proteins have been shown to regulate cell fate and segment identity by promoting the expression of specific genetic programs. In contrast to their restricted biological action in vivo, however, most homeodomain factors exhibit promiscuous DNA binding properties in vitro, suggesting a requirement for additional cofactors that enhance target site selectivity. In this regard, thepbx family of homeobox genes has been found to heterodimerize with and thereby augment the DNA binding activity of certain hox proteins on a subset of potential target sites. Here we examine the transcriptional properties of a forcedhox-pbx heterodimer containing the pancreas-specific orphan homeobox factor pdx fused to pbx-1a. Compared to the pdx monomer, the forced pdx-pbx1a dimer, displayed 10- to 20-fold-higher affinity for a consensushox-pbx binding site but was completely unable to bind ahox monomer recognition site. The pdx-pbx dimer stimulated target gene expression via an N-terminaltrans-activation domain in pdx that interacts with the coactivator CREB binding protein. The pdx-pbxdimer was also found to repress transcription via a C-terminal domain in pbx-1a that associates with the corepressors SMRT and NCoR. The transcriptional properties of the pdx-pbx1complex appear to be regulated at the level of alternative splicing; apdx-pbx polypeptide containing the pbx1bisoform, which lacks the C-terminal extension in pbx1a, was unable to repress target gene expression via NCoR-SMRT. Sincepbx1a and pbx1b are differentially expressed in endocrine versus exocrine compartments of the adult pancreas, our results illustrate a novel mechanism by which pbx proteins may modulate the expression of specific genetic programs, either positively or negatively, during development.


PLoS Genetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. e1009039
Author(s):  
Yi Kuang ◽  
Anna Pyo ◽  
Natanel Eafergan ◽  
Brittany Cain ◽  
Lisa M. Gutzwiller ◽  
...  

Notch signaling controls many developmental processes by regulating gene expression. Notch-dependent enhancers recruit activation complexes consisting of the Notch intracellular domain, the Cbf/Su(H)/Lag1 (CSL) transcription factor (TF), and the Mastermind co-factor via two types of DNA sites: monomeric CSL sites and cooperative dimer sites called Su(H) paired sites (SPS). Intriguingly, the CSL TF can also bind co-repressors to negatively regulate transcription via these same sites. Here, we tested how synthetic enhancers with monomeric CSL sites versus dimeric SPSs bind Drosophila Su(H) complexes in vitro and mediate transcriptional outcomes in vivo. Our findings reveal that while the Su(H)/Hairless co-repressor complex similarly binds SPS and CSL sites in an additive manner, the Notch activation complex binds SPSs, but not CSL sites, in a cooperative manner. Moreover, transgenic reporters with SPSs mediate stronger, more consistent transcription and are more resistant to increased Hairless co-repressor expression compared to reporters with the same number of CSL sites. These findings support a model in which SPS containing enhancers preferentially recruit cooperative Notch activation complexes over Hairless repression complexes to ensure consistent target gene activation.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Chau ◽  
Xiangduo Kong ◽  
Nam Nguyen ◽  
Katherine Williams ◽  
Rabi Tawil ◽  
...  

AbstractFacioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) is linked to misexpression of the transcription factor, DUX4. Although DUX4 target gene expression is often readily detectable, analysis of DUX4 expression has been limited due to its low expression in patient samples. Recently, single cell/nucleus RNA-sequencing was used to detect the native expression of DUX4 for the first time, but important spatial relationships with its target gene expression was missing. Furthermore, dynamics of DUX4 expression during myoblast differentiation has not been fully explored. In order to study the spatiotemporal relationship of DUX4 and key target genes, we performed RNA FISH on immortalized FSHD2 patient skeletal muscle cells. Using two probe sets, DUX4 transcripts were detected in 1-4% of myotubes after 3-day differentiation in vitro. We found that DUX4 transcripts mainly localize as foci in one or two nuclei in a myotube compared to abundant accumulation of the target gene transcripts in the cytoplasm. Over a 13-day differentiation timecourse, DUX4 expression without target gene expression significantly increased and peaked at day 7. Target gene expression correlates better with DUX4 expression early in differentiation while the expression of target genes without detectable DUX4 transcripts increases later. Consistently, shRNA depletion of DUX4-activated transcription factors, DUXA and LEUTX, specifically repressed a DUX4-target gene, KDM4E, later in differentiation, suggesting that following the initial activation by DUX4, target genes themselves contribute to the maintenance of downstream gene expression. Together, in situ detection of the DUX4 and target gene transcripts provided new insight into dynamics of DUX4 transcriptional network in FSHD patient myocytes.Significance StatementFSHD is the third most common muscular dystrophy and is associated with upregulation of DUX4, a transcription factor, and its target genes. Although target genes are easily detectable in FSHD, low frequency DUX4 upregulation in patient myocytes is difficult to detect, and examining the relationship and dynamics of DUX4 and target gene expression without artificial overexpression of DUX4 has been challenging. Using RNAScope with highly specific probes, we detect the endogenous DUX4 and target gene transcripts in situ in patient skeletal myotubes during differentiation in vitro. Our study reveals a unique DUX4 expression pattern and its relationship to the expression of target genes, and evidence for self-sustainability of the target gene network. The study provides important new insights into the FSHD disease mechanism.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Kuang ◽  
Anna Pyo ◽  
Natanel Eafergan ◽  
Brittany Cain ◽  
Lisa M. Gutzwiller ◽  
...  

AbstractNotch signaling controls many developmental processes by regulating gene expression. Notch-dependent enhancers recruit activation complexes consisting of the Notch intracellular domain, the Cbf/Su(H)/Lag1 (CSL) transcription factor (TF), and the Mastermind co-factor via two types of DNA sites: monomeric CSL sites and cooperative dimer sites called Su(H) paired sites (SPS). Intriguingly, the CSL TF can also bind co-repressors to negatively regulate transcription via these same sites. Here, we tested how enhancers with monomeric CSL sites versus dimeric SPSs bind Drosophila Su(H) complexes in vitro and mediate transcriptional outcomes in vivo. Our findings reveal that while the Su(H)/Hairless co-repressor complex similarly binds SPS and CSL sites in an additive manner, the Notch activation complex binds SPSs, but not CSL sites, in a cooperative manner. Moreover, transgenic reporters with SPSs mediate stronger, more consistent transcription and are more resistant to increased Hairless co-repressor expression compared to reporters with the same number of CSL sites. These findings support a model in which SPS containing enhancers preferentially recruit cooperative Notch activation complexes over Hairless repression complexes to ensure consistent target gene activation.


Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2049-P
Author(s):  
REBECCA K. DAVIDSON ◽  
NOLAN CASEY ◽  
JASON SPAETH

Author(s):  
Philipp Moritz Fricke ◽  
Angelika Klemm ◽  
Michael Bott ◽  
Tino Polen

Abstract Acetic acid bacteria (AAB) are valuable biocatalysts for which there is growing interest in understanding their basics including physiology and biochemistry. This is accompanied by growing demands for metabolic engineering of AAB to take advantage of their properties and to improve their biomanufacturing efficiencies. Controlled expression of target genes is key to fundamental and applied microbiological research. In order to get an overview of expression systems and their applications in AAB, we carried out a comprehensive literature search using the Web of Science Core Collection database. The Acetobacteraceae family currently comprises 49 genera. We found overall 6097 publications related to one or more AAB genera since 1973, when the first successful recombinant DNA experiments in Escherichia coli have been published. The use of plasmids in AAB began in 1985 and till today was reported for only nine out of the 49 AAB genera currently described. We found at least five major expression plasmid lineages and a multitude of further expression plasmids, almost all enabling only constitutive target gene expression. Only recently, two regulatable expression systems became available for AAB, an N-acyl homoserine lactone (AHL)-inducible system for Komagataeibacter rhaeticus and an l-arabinose-inducible system for Gluconobacter oxydans. Thus, after 35 years of constitutive target gene expression in AAB, we now have the first regulatable expression systems for AAB in hand and further regulatable expression systems for AAB can be expected. Key points • Literature search revealed developments and usage of expression systems in AAB. • Only recently 2 regulatable plasmid systems became available for only 2 AAB genera. • Further regulatable expression systems for AAB are in sight.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 417-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel-Rainer Hanauske ◽  
Ulrike Eismann ◽  
Olaf Oberschmidt ◽  
Heike Pospisil ◽  
Steve Hoffmann ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document