scholarly journals Profile of Long-Term Survivors in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5522-5522
Author(s):  
Florence Sabirou ◽  
Gautier Defossez ◽  
Pierre Ingrand ◽  
Isabelle Azais ◽  
Geraldine Durand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
First Line ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Incident Cases ◽  
Long Term Survivors

Background: The treatment revolution of multiple myeloma (MM) with the advent of novel therapies, proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators and newer drugs lead to increased survival. Clinical characteristics at diagnosis of Long-term survivor (>5 years after the start of treatment) were described; however data regarding the profile of lines of treatment is very limited. The aim of this study was to describe the profiles of response of this population. Methods: The Poitou‐Charentes cancer registry has exhaustively registered incident cases of MM from 2008 to 2010. The follow-up date was December 31st, 2018. Patients (pts) alive after 5 years from the start of first line treatment were considered long-term survivors and their data were collected from their medical files. Three pts profiles were studied, very long responder (VLR) treated with a single line; long responder (LR) treated with [2-3] lines; and advanced (AdMM) [4 lines +[. Smoldering Myeloma, AL amyloidosis, lost to follow-up pts were excluded from the analysis. Results: Among the 396 MM registered, 177 were alive after 5 years, and 158 were included in the study. The mean age was 62.3 +/-11, sex ratio 1.2, 51% IgG, 25% IgA and 20% Light Chain isotype. ISS1 was 42%, 34% ISS2 and 14% ISS3. The median follow-up after the 5-year landmark was 39.9 +/-13 months and 52% pts died during follow-up. Overall, the median number of lines was 2.9 +/-2, 44% had at least one ASCT, 83% received Bortezomib, 72% Lenalidomide, 48% Thalidomide, 22% Pomalidomide, 20% Daratumumab (usually 3 lines+). VLR represented 19%, 27% LR, and 54% AdMM. In VLR group, 43% received a Bortezomib-based regimen (2 or 3 drugs) followed by ASCT, 47% a Melphalan-based regimen plus Thalidomide (MPT) or Bortezomib (MPV). In LR group, first line comprised: 39% Bortezomib-based regimen and ASCT versus 24% MPT and 15% MPV. Second line for LR group: 75% had Lenalidomide single agent or combination, 22% had a Bortezomib-based regimen, 17% had an ASCT. In the LR group, 45% received a third line: 40% Lenalidomide, mostly single agent, 25% a Bortezomib-based regimen and 3% had an ASCT. The AdMM group had a mean of 5.9 +/-1.6 lines (range 4 -11) and 56% of RR patients had at least one ASCT. Conclusion: Approximately 40% of MM were long-term survivors at 5 years from start of therapy in 2010, mainly on the basis of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulators-based regimens plus use of ASCT. The vast majority of pts reached the 5 years cut-off with [4;+[ lines, and very few pts were real long-term survivors with an early prolonged control of Myeloma. Future perspective will look into 10 years long-term survival, including novel drug developments with the advent of immunotherapy. Disclosures Sabirou: AbbVie: Research Funding. Leleu:Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Carsgen: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Oncopeptide: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Long-Term AL Amyloidosis Survivors Among Non-Selected Referral Population

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3226-3226
Author(s):  
Eli Muchtar ◽  
Morie A. Gertz ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
David Dingli ◽  
Francis K. Buadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survivors

Abstract Introduction: Prognosis of AL amyloidosis has improved in recent years; however for many patients prognosis remains poor. We aimed to define patient-, disease- and treatment characteristics which are associated with long-term survival. Method: A retrospective chart review of all patients with biopsy-proven systemic AL amyloidosis, who were seen within 90 days of the confirmed diagnosis. Long-term survival was defined as 5-year and 10-year survival from the time of diagnosis. For 5-year survival we selected patients seen between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2012 (allowing a minimum of 5-year follow-up, n=1331) and for 10-year survival we screened patients seen between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2007 (allowing a minimum of 10-year follow-up; n=779). Treatment allocation was defined as the first regimen given, irrespective of subsequent treatment modifications. Results: Of the screening population, 498 patients survived ≥5 years from diagnosis (37% of the 5-year screening cohort) and 168 patients survived 10 years or more (22% of the 10-year screening cohort). Five-year survivors and 10-year survivors as compared to their counterparts were (Table): younger, higher proportion of women, more likely to have single organ involvement, less heart/liver/nerve involvement and more kidney involvement. Long-term survivors also had lower bone marrow plasma cell percentage at the time of diagnosis and lower tumor burden measured by the difference between involved to uninvolved light chain (dFLC). Similarly, long-term survivors had lower Mayo stages and higher systolic blood pressure. No difference in light chain isotype was observed between long-term survivors to long term non-survivors. Long-term survivors were less likely to be seen within 30 days of diagnosis compared to their counterparts (52% among 5-year survivors vs 67% among 5-year non-survivor; P<0.001). FISH abnormalities (data available for 555/1331 patients, 42%) were comparable between groups with regard to t(11;14) (50% among 5-year survival compared to 50% among 5-year non-survivors; P=0.93) and 13q abnormalities (34% vs 36%, respectively; P=0.53). However, trisomies were less frequently encountered in the 5-year survivor group (20% vs 29%, respectively; P=0.01), and far less common among 10-year survivors (11% vs 26%, respectively; P=0.04). Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was more likely to be associated with long-term survival. Of all patients who underwent ASCT, 74% survived more than 5 years and 49% survived more than 10 years. In comparison, among the standard-intensity therapies, 5-year survival rates for melphalan-dexamethasone, bortezomib-based regimens, immunomodulatory drug-based regimens and single agent dexamethasone/ melphalan-prednisone were 29%, 28%, 30% and 10%, respectively. The corresponding 10-year survival rates were 15%, 20%, 20% and 5%, respectively. Conclusions: Long-term AL survivors have distinct favorable baseline characteristics (including those introduced by referral bias) and ASCT as their initial therapy. Identification of these patients, especially the Mayo 2004 stage III and the Mayo 2012 stage III-IV patients who unexpectedly survived 10 years, will allow for further study and insights. Disclosures Gertz: Teva: Consultancy; Prothena: Honoraria; Alnylam: Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy; Ionis: Honoraria; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy; Research to Practice: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; janssen: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; spectrum: Consultancy, Honoraria; annexon: Consultancy. Lacy:Celgene: Research Funding. Dingli:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Participates in the International PNH Registry (for Mayo Clinic, Rochester) for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Participates in the International PNH Registry (for Mayo Clinic, Rochester) for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Kapoor:Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Russell:Vyriad: Equity Ownership. Kumar:KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dispenzieri:Celgene, Takeda, Prothena, Jannsen, Pfizer, Alnylam, GSK: Research Funding.

Ten Year-Long Term Survival After up-Front Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: Results From Two Prospective Clinical Trials

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 594-594
Author(s):  
Elena Zamagni ◽  
Francesco Di Raimondo ◽  
Francesca Patriarca ◽  
Patrizia Tosi ◽  
Annalisa Pezzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survivors

Abstract Abstract 594 Survival of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) has been extended with the introduction of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). More recently, availability of highly effective novel agents has further improved patient outcomes. However, it is still the matter of debate whether a proportion of patients treated with ASCT can enjoy a long term survival, while sustaining prolonged high quality response. To address this issue and to identify those variables which were related to long-term survival, we performed a post-hoc analysis of two large prospective clinical trials of ASCT in newly diagnosed MM patients, the first one comparing single versus double ASCT and the second one incorporating thalidomide-dexamethasone (TD) into double ASCT. A total of 321 patients were randomly assigned in the first study to receive either a single or double ASCT, as previously described (Cavo M et al, JCO 2007). Three hundred and fifty seven patients were enrolled in the subsequent multicenter phase 2 study incorporating TD from the outset until the second ASCT; details of the protocol were previously reported (Cavo et al, J. Clin. Oncol 2009). Results were updated as of 30 March 2012 and compared with those previously reported. All the analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. After a median follow-up of 61 months for the entire treatment population of the first study, PFS remained significantly longer with tandem versus single ASCT (median 37 vs 25 months, P= 0.012), while OS was similar in the two groups (median 71 vs 67 months). 47% and 33% of the patients in the double and single ASCT group achieved a CR+nCR (P= 0.008). Overall, in 24% and 11% of the patients, CR+nCR was sustained for more than 5 and 10 years, respectively. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, best response (CR+nCR) ever achieved was the most important variable significantly extending PFS (P= 0.003) and OS (P=0.050); random assignment to double ASCT was an additional variable predicting for prolonged PFS(P= 0.026). After a median follow-up of 84 months from starting TD in the second study, median values of PFS and OS were 47.2 and 109.6 months, respectively. The final rate of CR+nCR was 34%, which was maintained for a median of 53 months. Overall, in 42.1% and 9.1% of the patients CR+nCR was sustained for more than 5 and 8 years, respectively. On multivariate analysis, failure to ever achieve at least CR+nCR, low Hb, high β2-m and t(4;14)±del(17p) were found to be independent variables predicting for poorer outcomes. In particular, a shorter OS was seen for patients ever lacking high-quality responses (HR: 0.35, 0.23–0.54, p<0.0001) and with t(4;14)±del(17p) (HR: 0.51, 0.33–0.79, p=0.0030). Overall, 23% and 20% of patients in the first and second study were alive over 10 or 8 years, respectively (long-term survivors). Median PFS of long-term survivors in the 2 studies were 74 and 87.7 months, respectively, versus 25 and 37 months for the rest of the population (P= 0.0000). Median duration of CR+nCR were 70 and 78 months in the long-term survivors group for the first and second study, respectively, in comparison with 21 and 49 months in the remaining patients (P<0.001 for both). The 10 and 8-year estimates of OS after relapse or progression in the long-term survivors of the two protocols were 58% and 72%, respectively, in comparison to a median value of 24 and 23 months for the control group (p<0.0001 for both). In a logistic regression analysis, attainment of high-quality responses was independently associated with long-term survival in both the studies (first study: OR: 1.8, 1.06–3.01, P= 0.03; second study: OR: 4.3, 2.17–8.60, P= 0.000). In conclusion, although the comparison between TD incorporated into ASCT and ASCT without thalidomide was not directly addressed by this analysis, TD + ASCT was associated with extended PFS and OS. Approximately 20% of the patients undergoing up-front ASCT can achieve long term survival (8–10 years from start of treatment), with 33% of them remaining relapse free. Attainment of sustained high-quality responses was the leading independent variable predicting for long-term OS. Prolonged survival after relapse was a contributing factor to long-term OS. Disclosures: Off Label Use: One of the 2 protocols discussed includes the use of thalidomide as induction prior to ASCT.

scholarly journals Clinical and Biological Characteristics and Outcomes of Richter Transformation : A French Multicenter Study from the Filo Group

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4112-4112
Author(s):  
Charline Moulin ◽  
Romain Morizot ◽  
Thomas Remen ◽  
Hélène Augé ◽  
Florian Bouclet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Long Term Survivors ◽  
First Line Treatment

Introduction: About 2 to 10% of patients (pts) diagnosed with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) develop diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, so-called Richter transformation (RT)) over long-term follow-up. The outcomes of pts with RT are variable and poorly understood and there is no consensus on the best therapeutic approach. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics, outcomes and factors predictive of survival in a large series of RT from the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO). Methods: Biopsy-confirmed RT (limited to DLBCL and excluding Hodgkin lymphoma) diagnosed from 2001 to 2018 were identified from eight FILO centers. Clinical and biological characteristics of CLL and RT at diagnosis, including cytogenetics, clonal relation with the pre-existing CLL, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status, cell of origin (COO) analyzed by immunohistochemistry and RT score (Tsimberidou AM et al, J Clin Oncol, 2006) were analyzed as well as treatment and outcomes. Overall survivals (OS) were defined as time from CLL and RT diagnosis to death from any cause and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4. Results: A total of 70 CLL pts who developed RT were identified. The median age at CLL diagnosis was 62 years old (range 35-82), and 50 (71.4 %) were male. The median time to transformation was 5.5 years (range 0 to 22 years), with 12 simultaneous diagnosis of CLL and RT. Prior to RT, 20 (29%) pts had not been treated for CLL, 50 received one (n=21) or more (n= 29) line of treatment ; 6 pts had received a novel agent (ibrutinib, idelalisib or venetoclax). The median age at RT diagnosis was 68 years old (range 42-88). All biopsies were centrally reviewed; 38/58 pts (66%) had elevated LDH (>1.5N) ; 35/65 pts (54 %) had bulky disease (≥ 5 cm); 10/54 (18.5%) pts had del(17p) or TP53 mutation ; 9/42 pts (21%) had a complex karyotype (at least 3 abnormalities). The CLL and RT were clonally related in 27/27 (100%) tested pts. COO by Hans algorithm was non germinal center B cell-like (GCB) in 26/28 pts (93%). EBV was positive or detected in 5/40 (12.5%) pts. The median of Ki67 positivity was 70% (range 30% to 100%). The RT score (based at RT diagnosis on ECOG performance status 2-4, LDH >1.5 x normal, platelets<100 x 109/L, tumor size >5 cm and >1 prior therapy for CLL) was : low risk in 17 pts (31%), low-intermediate risk in 10 pts (19%), high-intermediate risk in 14 pts (25%) and high risk in 14 pts (25%). The most common first-line treatment of RT was immunochemotherapy (n=57, 87%) including R-CHOP-like regimen (n=48, 73%). Autologous or allogeneic transplantation was performed for 7 pts (11%). Response to first-line treatment was complete or partial response in 26 pts (40%), and stable disease or progression in 39 pts (60%). After a median follow-up of 8 years, 51/64 pts (80%) have died. The main causes of death were progressive DLBCL (n=36, 71%), infection (n=8, 16%) or progressive CLL (n=2, 4%). The median OS of the cohort from CLL and RT diagnosis (Figure 1) were 7.8 years and 9.5 months, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients with TP53 disruption at CLL stage, low platelets count, elevated LDH, elevated beta2-microglobulin, high ECOG score, high RT score, EBV positivity and absence of response to first-line RT treatment had worse OS. The ECOG score, platelets count and TP53 disruption remain significant in multivariate Cox-regression. Last, we compared the clinical and biological parameters of two Richter groups defined as: (i) short-term survivors (<12 months, n = 34) and (ii) long-term survivors (>48 months, n = 18). Long survival was significantly associated with elevated platelets count, low LDH, low ECOG, low RT score and response to RT first-line treatment. Discussion: The clinical outcomes of RT patients is poor and novel treatment options are needed. However, a group of long-term survivors was identified, characterized by elevated platelets count, low LDH, low ECOG, low RT score and response to immunochemotherapy. Disclosures Leblond: Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Thieblemont:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Kyte: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Cellectis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cymbalista:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Sunesis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria. Guièze:Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Broseus:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding. Feugier:gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Mortality After Cure of Testicular Seminoma

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 640-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunar K. Zagars ◽  
Matthew T. Ballo ◽  
Andrew K. Lee ◽  
Sara S. Strom
Keyword(s):  
Observation Interval ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Standardized Mortality Ratio ◽  
Testicular Seminoma ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Cancer Management ◽  
Long Term Survivors

Purpose To determine the incidence of potentially treatment-related mortality in long-term survivors of testicular seminoma treated by orchiectomy and radiation therapy (XRT). Patients and Methods From all 477 men with stage I or II testicular seminoma treated at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) with postorchiectomy megavoltage XRT between 1951 and 1999, 453 never sustained relapse of their disease. Long-term survival for these 453 men was evaluated with the person-years method to determine the standardized mortality ratio (SMR). SMRs were calculated for all causes of death, cardiac deaths, and cancer deaths using standard US data for males. Results After a median follow-up of 13.3 years, the 10-, 20-, 30-, and 40-year actuarial survival rates were 93%, 79%, 59%, and 26%, respectively. The all-cause SMR over the entire observation interval was 1.59 (99% CI, 1.21 to 2.04). The SMR was not excessive for the first 15 years of follow-up: SMR, 1.30 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.77); but beyond 15 years the SMR was 1.85 (99% CI, 1.30 to 2.55). The overall cardiac-specific SMR was 1.61 (95% CI, 1.21 to 2.24). The cardiac SMR was significantly elevated only beyond 15 years (P < .01). The overall cancer-specific SMR was 1.91 (99% CI, 1.14 to 2.98). The cancer SMR was also significant only after 15 years of follow-up (P < .01). An increased mortality was evident in patients treated with and without mediastinal XRT. Conclusion Long-term survivors of seminoma treated with postorchiectomy XRT are at significant excess risk of death as a result of cardiac disease or second cancer. Management strategies that minimize these risks but maintain the excellent hitherto observed cure rates need to be actively pursued.

scholarly journals Chemotherapy-Free Initial Treatment of Advanced Indolent Lymphoma Has Durable Effect With Low Toxicity: Results From Two Nordic Lymphoma Group Trials With More Than 10 Years of Follow-Up

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (33) ◽  
pp. 3315-3323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Lockmer ◽  
Bjørn Østenstad ◽  
Hans Hagberg ◽  
Harald Holte ◽  
Ann-Sofie Johansson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Indolent Lymphoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
New Therapy

Purpose For indolent lymphoma, the optimal timing, sequence, and choice of therapeutic regimens remain a matter of debate. In two Nordic Lymphoma Group randomized trials, symptomatic or clearly progressing patients were treated first line with a rituximab-containing regimen without chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to assess long-term survival, risk of transformation, and need of new therapies. Methods Data were collected at cross-sectional follow-up for 321 patients with indolent lymphoma (84% with follicular lymphomas [FL]) included in one of two Nordic Lymphoma Group trials (accrual 1998 to 1999 and 2002 to 2008). All patients received first-line therapy with one or two cycles of four weekly infusions of rituximab 375 mg/m2, and 148 were randomly allocated to the addition of interferon alfa-2a. Follow-up data were retrieved from initial trial databases and medical records on repeated clinical evaluations. Results At the end of follow-up, 73% of patients were alive, with a median follow-up after random assignment of 10.6 years. Among all, 36% (38% with FL) had never needed chemotherapy. For patients with FL who required new therapy within 24 months because of early disease progression, the 10-year survival rate was 59% versus 81% for those with longer remission. Interferon was not shown to improve long-term outcome. Transformation was diagnosed in 20% of all patients (2.4% per person-year) and in 18% with FL. An additional malignancy was found in 12%. Conclusion Approximately one third of patients with symptomatic indolent lymphoma (30% with FL, 23% without FL) did not need new therapy in the long term after first-line rituximab without chemotherapy. In the entire cohort, 10-year survival was excellent with no major safety issues, which suggests that chemotherapy can be delayed safely in the majority of patients.

Long-Term Survival in Patients Receiving Conventional Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma; Results from United Kingdom Medical Research Council Trials 1980–1997.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4921-4921
Author(s):  
Bradley M. Augustson ◽  
Gulnaz Begum ◽  
Gareth J. Morgan ◽  
J. Anthony Child ◽  
Nicola J. Barth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Medical Research ◽  
Conventional Therapy ◽  
Research Council ◽  
Medical Research Council ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Serological Response ◽  
Long Term Survivors

Abstract Introduction: With conventional therapy, the median survival for patients following diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) is 31 months. Prior to 1985 2–4% of patients survived up to 10 years, subsequently this figure has improved to around 10%. We have analysed the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (MRC) trial records to identify the proportion, presentation features and outcome of patients who have survived greater than 7.5 years. Methods: Patients selected were those randomised to conventional (melphalan and ABCM based) therapy who survived greater than 7.5 years; all of these patients had achieved a plateau phase. Their presenting clinical and laboratory features were compared to a group of patients (matched by trial and treatment) who also reached plateau but were the first of the cohort to die directly from MM. Time to response and absolute response was calculated. Clinical course and performance status were assessed from 3 month follow-up clinical data forms and central laboratory paraprotein analysis. Results: 239/2781 (8.5%) of eligible patients survived greater than 7.5 years. 170 patients had died (median and interquartile range (IQR) 9.5 years and 8.3–11.7 years) and 69 patients were still alive at the time of the analysis, median follow-up of 11.4 years (IQR 9.2–14.1 years). Compared to the matched short-lived control group, these long term survivors had lower β2-microglobulin, preserved albumin, lower marrow plasmacytosis, less renal impairment, better performance status, fewer fractures, less bone pain and fewer lytic lesions at presentation. There were no differences in age, lymphocytes, or depth of serological response, however, median time to reach plateau was delayed for the long term survivors {0.77 years (IQR 0.41–1.05) versus 0.42 years (0.26–0.73 for controls)}. 35 patients remain in first plateau with no progression, 28 patients died in first plateau most commonly of vascular disease (25%) or cancer (21%). 176 patients relapsed and 11 (6%) died of myeloma in first relapse, however the majority (140/176, 80%) achieved a second plateau and having relapsed a second time 53/114 (46%) achieved a third plateau. 43 of these 140 patients died in second plateau or beyond of a cause other than myeloma - (vascular 7/43 (16%), cancer 5/43 (12%), renal 5/43 (12%), infection 6/43 (14%), other 4/43 (9%). 30/239 patients (13%) died with no information on disease status or cause of death. Following second relapse 73/114 (64%) patients died directly as a result of myeloma. Time spent in performance status 1 and 2 was 96% for plateau 1, 83% for relapse 1 and 63% beyond relapse 2. Conclusions: 8.5% of MRC trial patients receiving conventional non-intensive therapy survive greater than 7.5 years. Factors associated with long survival include low disease burden, better performance status and less end organ damage. Absolute serological response had no bearing on overall outcome; however rapid response is associated with poorer survival. The existence of second and subsequent plateau phases of MM, have rarely been documented in the literature. A large proportion of time following relapse is spent with good performance status, suggesting that patients experience a good quality of life during much of this period.

Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma for Long-Term Follow-up: Single Center Results

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5836-5836
Author(s):  
Weiwei Sui ◽  
Dehui Zou ◽  
Gang An ◽  
Shuhui Deng ◽  
Yan Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
First Line ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Agent Based ◽  
Total Treatment ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and long-term outcome of the total treatment of induction therapy, ASCT and consolidation and maintenance therapy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was made on in multiple myeloma patients in our center between April 1, 2003 and February 1, 2016. The 157 patietns received autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and review the autologous transplantation of long-term follow-up results. Analysis of the effect of transplantation efficacy, the impact on survival remission of different transplantation depth, transplantation in first line or not, salvage transplantation, prognosis of different staging system and other factors. Results: The baseline characteristics of the patients were shown in table 1. Overall patient ASCT before total effective rate (ORR) was 93.6%, in which the complete remission (CR) ratio was 33.1%. After ASCT, the best treatment response rate of PR was 80.3%, and the rate of CR was 58.6%. 91.69 months of median follow-up, patients with an overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) respectively 91.69 and 50.76 months; in 2005 before the median OS and PFS 39.0m and 23.0m. In 2005 after respectively and 56.41m 120.90m, P = 0.000. The median OS and PFS in the first line transplantation group and salvage transplantation group were vs 54.21m 39.0m and vs 7.09m 119.0m (P value was 0). 136 cases of patients with R-ISS stage, I, II, III of the patients with the median survival time were 120.90m (n=46), 86.43m (n=69), 35.65m (n=21), there were significant differences between groups, p=0.000. Each period of PFS were 72.11m, 51.84m, 28.09m, I and II, III,, p=0.001 and p=0.03, while there was no significant difference between II and III, p=0.122. The received autologous transplantation as first-line and salvage treatment of patients with subgroup survival analysis, median OS of the R-ISS stage III patients and different 15.84m 35.65m, P = 0.031; two groups of patients the median PFS (phase I: 91.69m vs18.92m; II: vs 16.69m 53.42m; phase III: vs 5.91m 28.52m) have difference (P = 0.000). In the first-line transplantation group, transplantation is more than or equal to PR and did not get effective PR group between OS were significantly different; before transplantation achieved CR, PR but did not obtain Cr and did not get effective PR group between PFS were significantly different; after transplantation and achieved CR CR did not get the patients had a median PFS were 65.57m 48.13m, P = 0.039 and median OS no difference. Accept any kind of noval agent- based chemotherapy were significantly longer OS and PFS than traditional chemotherapy (P = 0.001, P = 0.004) .There was no obvious difference on median OS between based regimen (bortezomib group median OS: NR; thalidomide group:120.90m); PFS in thalidomide group (median PFS : NR vs 54.21m) significantly prolonged (P = 0.010). By comparing the baseline characteristics of the two groups, it was found that the PFS was significantly shorter in the bortezomib group with an extra medullary lesion. Multivariate analysis showed that only R-ISS and the depth of remission before transplantation had effect on OS (p=0.003) and PFS (p=0.036) respectively. Conclusion: The total treatment of novel agent-based chemotherapy and ASCT for transplantation-eligible multiple myeloma patients is effective, further improve the remission rate and remission depth, prolong PFS and OS, the overall median survival up to 120.9m. First line transplantation can significantly prolong the OS and PFS compared with salvage transplantation. R-ISS and pre-transplant remission depth are prognostic factors influencing survival of patients. The total treatment to thalidomide based without extramedullary perhaps makes patients get long-term survival. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Precision medicine: Clinical outcomes including long-term survival according to the pathway targeted and treatment period–The IMPACT study.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA2553-LBA2553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou ◽  
David S. Hong ◽  
Jennifer J. Wheler ◽  
Gerald Steven Falchook ◽  
Aung Naing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pi3k Pathway ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
The Impact

LBA2553 Background: We evaluated the impact of pathway targeted and long-term follow-up of patients (pts) with refractory cancers referred to phase I trials. Methods: Pts referred to our program (2007-2013) had CLIA molecular testing. Pts treated with matched targeted therapy (MTT) vs. non-matched therapy (NMT) were analyzed. Results: Of 3,743 pts who had testing, 1,307 had ≥1 alteration and received therapy (MTT 711, NMT 596): med. age 57 yrs, range 16-86; 39% men; med. no. of prior therapies 4, range 0-16. The most common tumors were gastrointestinal 24.2%, gynecologic 19.4%, breast 13.5%, melanoma 11.9%, and lung 8.7%. Targeting MEK/RAF and RET pathways correlated with higher rates of CR/PR/SD≥6 months (mos), PFS and OS compared to others (all P < .001) (Table). Plateau was noted in OS (start, 38 mos): 74 of 711 (10.4%) in the MTT (max 10.7+ yrs) vs. 24 of 596 (4%) in the NMT (max 6 yrs) group were alive (p < .0001). In the MTT group, factors predicting longer PFS were non-PI3K pathway MTT (p < .001), no liver metastases (p < .001), PS < 2 (p = .006), normal LDH (p < .001) and albumin (p = .01) levels, and non-single agent therapy (p = .02). Factors predicting longer OS were non-PI3K pathway MTT (p < .001), no liver metastases (p < .001), PS < 2 (p < .001), normal LDH (p < .001) and albumin (p = .001) levels, and normal PLT counts (p = .03). Conclusions: Outcomes were superior in pts matched to RET and MEK/RAF inhibitors. Factors predicting longer PFS and OS were identified. In the MTT group, 10.4% of patients had OS ≥ 38 mos, the plateau starting point. Clinical trial information: NCT00851032. [Table: see text]

Response to first-line chemotherapy and long-term survival in patients with multiple myeloma

2003 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Riccardi ◽  
O Mora ◽  
C Tinelli ◽  
C Porta ◽  
M Danova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

scholarly journals Conditional Survival Analysis of 816 Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients Constitutes a Different Way to Provide More Specifically Determined Prognosis

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2091-2091
Author(s):  
Maximilian Schinke ◽  
Inga Promny ◽  
Stefanie Hieke ◽  
Johannes M. Waldschmidt ◽  
Gabriele Ihorst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Conditional Survival ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Prediction Time ◽  
Risk Parameters ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Introduction: Disease monitoring based on genetics or other molecular markers obtained by noninvasive or minimally invasive methods will potentially allow the early detection of treatment response or disease progression in cancer patients. Investigations in order to identify prognostic factors, e.g. patient's baseline characteristics or molecular markers, contributing to long-term survival potentially provide important information for patients with multiple myeloma. Overall survival (OS) is not very informative for patients who already survived one or more years. To better characterize long-term survival respectively long-term survivors, conditional survival (CS) analyses are useful. Conditional survival (CS) describes probabilities of surviving t additional years given they survived s years and provides information, how prognosis evolves over time. We have demonstrated the use of CS in a large data set of multiple myeloma patients with long-term survival which is mandatory for the calculation of CS (Hieke,... Engelhardt, Schumacher. CCR 2015). Methods: We evaluated 816 consecutive multiple myeloma patients treated at our department from 1997 to 2011 with follow-up until the end of 2011. Patients' data were assessed via electronic medical record (EMR) retrieval within an innovative research data warehouse. Our platform, the University of Freiburg Translational Research Integrated Database Environment (U-RIDE), acquires and stores all patient data contained in the EMR at our hospital and provides immediate advanced text searching capacity. We assessed 21 variables including gender, age, stage and admission period. We calculated 5-years CS and stratified 5-years CS according to disease- and host-related risks. Component-wise likelihood-based boosting and variables selected by boosting were investigated in a multivariable Cox model. Results: The OS probabilities at 5- and 10- years were 50% and 25%, respectively. The 5-year CS probabilities remained almost constant over the years a patient had already survived after initial diagnosis (~50%). According to baseline variables, conditional survival estimates showed no gender differences. The estimated 5-year survival probabilities varied substantially, from 25% for patients ages 70 or older to 65% for patients younger than 60 years. Similarly, patients with D&S stage I have an estimated 5-year survival probability of about 75% compared with 40% for patients with D&S stages II and III. Significant risk factors via Cox proportional hazard model were D&S stage II+III, age >70 years, hemoglobin <10g/dl, ß2-MG ≥5.5mg/dl, LDH ≥200U/l. Renal impairment, low albumin and unfavorable cytogenetics increased the risk, but failed to reach significance. Cytogenetics, response, response duration and other risk parameters post treatment are currently included in our assessment. Of note, over the study period, admission of patients <60 years decreased from 60% to 34%, but increased for those ≥70 years from 10% to 35%, respectively, illustrating that not only young and fit, but also elderly patients are increasingly treated within large referral and university centers and that patient cohorts and risks do not remain constant over time. Conclusions: Conditional survival has attracted attention in recent years either in an absolute or relative form where the latter is based on a comparison with an age-adjusted normal population being highly relevant from a public health perspective. In its absolute form, conditional survival constitutes the quantity of major interest in a clinical context. We defined conditional survival by using the fact that the patient is alive at the prediction time s as the conditioning event. Alternatively, one could determine conditional survival, given that the patient is alive and progression-free or alive, but has progression at time s (Zamboni et al. JCO 2010). Analysis of the above and additional variables from diagnosis to prediction time s may refine conditional survival towards an even more specifically determined prognosis; follow-up response and risk parameters most likely further refining these CS analyses. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Wäsch: MSD: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding; Comprehensiv Cancer Center Freiburg: Research Funding; German Cancer Aid: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document