scholarly journals Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma Patients Older Than 65 Year-Old, 12-Years Analysis of National Cancer Database

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2195-2195
Author(s):  
Veli Bakalov ◽  
Amulya Yellala ◽  
Raed Benkhadra ◽  
Thejus Jayakrishnan ◽  
Yazan Samhouri ◽  
...  

Introduction. The diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) is often made in elderly individuals (median age at diagnosis 69 years) with over a third of patients exceeding 75 years of age. Many elderly patients are frequently excluded from clinical trials because of predefined upper age limit of 65 years limiting accessibility to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for a large proportion of MM patients. Based on limited multicenter studies and randomized clinical trials in this population, we used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to assess the outcomes of ASCT in MM patients older than 65 years of age. Methods. We queried the NCDB for patients with MM diagnosed between 2004 -2015 treated with ASCT as frontline therapy, yielding a final cohort of 9,383 patients. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the likelihood of receiving ASCT. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of last contact or death using Kaplan Meier methodology. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) are reported, with α=0.05 used to indicate statistical significance. Results. The median age was 67.0 (range: 19-90). The majority of patients were older than 65 (58.5%), male (54.7%), Caucasian (75.6%), had government insurance (88%)and had a Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity score (CDCS) of 0 (75.5%). In addition to older age, insurance status, low annual income higher CDCS were associated with lower chances of receiving ASCT (Table 1). Patients in Urban areas (OR 1.377, CI 95% 1.286-1.475), and patients in Academic/Research Centers (OR 4.379 were CI 95%, 3.852-4.978) were more likely to receive ASCT. In patients younger than 65-years of age rate of ASCT was 7.0% in 2004 and increased to 16.7% in 2015. The annual rate of ASCT in patients older than 65-years of age was 1.1% in 2004 and increased to 4.7% in 2015. The multivariable cox proportional hazards of death in patients receiving ASCT was associated with improved survival (HR 0.492, CI 95% 0.473-0.512). Age (>65 years old HR 1.184, 95% CI 1.053-1.331), insurance status (uninsured HR 1.361, CI 95% 1.302-1.422, Medicaid HR 1.365, 95% CI 1.318-1.414, Medicare HR 1.271, 95% CI 1.244-1.299) and higher comorbidity score were associated with worse survival (Table 2). Median survival in patients younger than 65-years old receiving ASCT was 102.6 month versus 66.6 months in patients not receiving ASCT (HR 0.596, 95% CI 0.568-0.624) (Figure 1). Median survival in patients older than 65 years old and not receiving ASCT was 86.3 months versus 28.4 months in patients not receiving ASCT (HR 0.344, 95% CI 0.0320-0.371). Conclusions. The findings of the present study demonstrate decreased utilization of ASCT in older patients with MM, despite significant survival benefit of such therapy. Other factors associated with decreased likelihood of ASCT are such as insurance status and annual income unfold existing disparities in patients with MM receiving ASCT. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 5118-5118
Author(s):  
Tareq Braik ◽  
Dayra Avila ◽  
Shivi Jain ◽  
Manila Gaddh ◽  
Barabara Yim ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 5118 Introduction: Since the mid 1990s, high dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell rescue has been considered the standard of care for front-line treatment in younger patients with multiple myeloma. This standard of care has been based on randomized controlled trials that compared autologus stem cell transplant (ASCT) with conventional chemotherapy. During the past decade, novel agents (NA), thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalinomide, have replaced conventional chemotherapy in the treatment of myeloma. These agents, used frontline, have shown promise in improving the outcome of myeloma patients without increasing toxicity. There are no studies to date comparing NA therapy to ASCT to determine whether there is a survival difference or whether NA therapy may reduce the need for transplantation. Many of our patients have no health insurance coverage and transplant is not a therapeutic option for them. We have attempted to compare the outcome of such patients receiving NA therapy with those in the literature who received conventional chemotherapy followed by ASCT. Methods: Ninety nine patients with multiple myeloma were treated at John H Stroger Hospital of Cook County between 2001 and 2011. All patients received novel agents (thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalinomide) as part of their therapy. Only 18/99 (18.2%) went for high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT and the remaining 81/99 (81.8%) received novel therapy without ASCT. We compared the outcome of patients who received novel therapy alone to a historical control group from the literature who received ASCT with conventional therapy (N Engl J Med 2003;348:1875–83). Overall survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results: We evaluated 99 consecutive myeloma patients (38% males and 61% female) of which 65% were African Americans, 19% Hispanics and 7% whites. All 3 stages (international staging system) of myeloma were equally represented. The median age at diagnosis was 60 years (40–85yr). Median follow up was 48 months (12–120). During the ten year follow up period, 60 patients (60.4%) have died. Twenty four out of 99 patients (24.2%) received only one line of therapy. 75 patients received more than one line of therapy. 75% received thalidomide-based therapy, 13% received bortezomib-based therapy and 12% received lenalinomide-based therapy. The median survival of patients who received novel therapy without ASCT (n=81) was 60 months, which is higher than the median survival of the historical controls who received ASCT reported by Child et al, N Engl J Med 2003;348:1875–83, (median survival = 54.1 months), the difference was statistically significant (P=0.0329). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups by sex (p=0.927) and race (p=0.421). The 5-year survival of patients who received novel therapy without ASCT (n=81) was 48.2%. For those who were younger than 65 years (n=54), the median survival was 72 months and the 5-year survival was 58.1% in comparison to those who were 65 years and older (n=27), the median survival was 46 months and the 5-year survival was 29.2% (P=0.029). Conclusion: Novel agents are effective frontline therapy for multiple myeloma, especially in patients younger than 65. Our cohort had remarkable results in comparison to a historical population of patients who had ASCT with conventional chemotherapy. Since there is no curative therapy to date, a prospective randomized trial comparing NA with ASCT will be essential to clarify the role of ASCT in the era of novel therapy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. S444-S445
Author(s):  
Bella Maldonado-Guerrero ◽  
Mayhua Lam-Rodríguez ◽  
Julie Abifandi-Valverde ◽  
Migleth Cisneros-López ◽  
Ana Thur de Koos-Acosta ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 09 (04) ◽  
pp. 233-235
Author(s):  
Rahul Naithani ◽  
Nitin Dayal ◽  
Reeta Rai

Abstract Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) in very young patients is uncommon, and no treatment guidelines exist for these patients. Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of five very young myeloma patients who underwent tandem autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Results The median age was 37 years (range = 34–40 years). A median of two leukapheresis was performed (range = 1–4). The median number of hematopoietic stem cells collected was 5.4 × 106/kg (4.4–8.2 × 106/kg). During first transplant, four patients received melphalan of 200 mg/m2 and one patient received melphalan of 140 mg/m2 (due to renal failure) as conditioning regimen. Second transplant conditioning was melphalan of 200 mg/m2 for one patient and melphalan of 140 mg/m2 for remaining four patients. Two patients were in complete remission, and two were in very good partial remission and one patient progressed to active disease at the time of tandem autologous bone marrow transplant. All patients developed significant mucositis. Neutrophil and platelet recovery was longer in tandem autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. More viral infections were seen in tandem transplant. Day 30 and day 100 mortality was nil. Conclusion We present data on tandem autologous HSCTs in very young patients with MM in India. Responses continued to improve in this small series.


eJHaem ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noa Biran ◽  
Wanting Zhai ◽  
Roxanne E. Jensen ◽  
Jeanne Mandelblatt ◽  
Susan Kumka ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document