scholarly journals Large Granular Lymphocytosis and Its Impact on Long Term Clinical Outcomes Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: 14-Year Follow-up Data

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2019-2019
Author(s):  
Guldane Cengiz Seval ◽  
Atilla Uslu ◽  
Ekin Kircali ◽  
Sinem Civriz Bozdag ◽  
Klara Dalva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Support Research

Introduction: Several studies have attempted to describe the characteristics associated with large granular lymphocytosis (LGL) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and its clinical significance. However the clinical features of LGL lymphocytosis in the allo-HSCT setting is still sparse. The current study represents a detailed review of 667 patients transplanted in a single center with the objective to define the incidence of LGL lymphocytosis, to identify associations with transplant-related clinical parameters and to assess the impact on transplant related outcomes. Patients and Methods: During a 14-year follow up period (2005-2017) in this unicentric cohort study, we identified 19 patients (2.8%) with a significant LGL lymphocytosis, among 667 consecutive adult patients who underwent allo-HSCT. LGL lymphocytosis was defined as the presence of at least two of the following criteria: (1) sustained lymphocytosis above 3.0x109/L observed in at least three consecutive determinations over a time frame of 2-3 months, (2) predominance (that is, >30%) of LGLs in the peripheral blood, (3) confirmation of clonality by T-cell receptor analysis using PCR. Flow cytometry analyses were performed using the flow cytometry system FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). The immunophenotyping of the lymphocytes included the following antibody panel: CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD7, CD8, CD16, CD25, CD30, CD56, CD57, HLA-DR, TCRab, and TCRgd. T-LGL expansion was defined as an abnormal T cell population type CD31, CD81, or CD41, with expression of at least 1 of the NK markers (CD16, CD57, or CD56), and with presence of LGLs in peripheral blood films. Results: A total of 19 (Female/ male: 10 [52.6 %]/ 9 [47.4 %]) patients included into the study met the morphological criteria for LGL lymphocytosis. The median age of the patients was 46 years (range, 18- 62 years). The majority of the patients (64.7 %) had the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia. The stem cell source was peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in 15 patients (88.2 %) and most of the patients underwent an allo-HSCT with a MAC (n= 13) regimen at a median of 25.1 months from allo-HSCT. The median onset of LGL lymphocytosis was 11.5 (2.1- 55.7) months and median lymphocyte count at the time of diagnosis of LGL lymphocytosis was 5400/ mL (5170- 8700/ mL). None of the patient showed cytopenia, palpable splenomegaly, and none of them had typical signs or symptoms of an autoimmune disease. In addition; GvHD, viral infections, disease relapse and loss of donor chimerism were excluded during lymphocytosis. Samples from 19 patients were phenotyped by flow cytometry. These studies confirmed a T cell phenotype of LGLs in the majority of patients (n=12). Two patients presented with LGLs consistent with NK cells and seven showed properties of a mixed NK/T-cell lineage. A monoclonal LGL population of T-cell origin was identified in eight (42.1%) of these patients. With a median follow-up of 12.2 months none of the patients demonstrating increased LGL values has progressed to LGL leukemia or any other lymphoproliferative disorder. Four patients experienced cutaneous acute GVHD followed by a progressive chronic GVHD. Two patient developed a grade II acute cutaneous GVHD which rapidly responded to steroids in addition to cyclosporin A. Five patients had de novo chronic GVHD. In subgroup analysis, we compared the OS of monoclonal and oligoclonal LGL lymphocytosis and 1-year-OS was longer but non-significantly in monoclonal LGL lymphocytosis group; 75% ± 1.6% vs. 44.4% ± 2.2%, respectively (p= 0.21) (Figure). Median PFS was 28.8 months in oligoclonal LGL lymphocytosis group and 8.3 months in monoclonal LGL lymphocytosis group but the number of patients in this group does not provide enough statistical power to confirm whether the differences in PFS were statistically significant (p= 0.3). At the time of this report, three patients have died. The primary cause of death was relapse of the primary disease in one of the patients, whereas 2 patients died of TRM (10.5%). Discussion: In conclusion, we observed LGL lymphocytosis in 2.8 % of a large cohort of post allo-HSCT survivors. Our data indicate that, even if monoclonal, post-transplantation LGL expansion may be considered as an expression of chronic stimulation triggered by allo-HSCT rather than the result of a malignant transformation. Disclosures Özcan: Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; BMS: Other: Travel support; Jazz: Other: Travel support; Sanofi: Other: Travel support; Bayer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Archigen: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Abdi Ibrahim: Other: Travel support; MSD: Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding, Travel support. Ilhan:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Beksac:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Lower Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Counts and Yields at Subsequent Donations Is Influenced By a Shorter Inter-Donation Interval between the First and Subsequent Mobilizations

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1962-1962
Author(s):  
Sandhya R. Panch ◽  
Brent R. Logan ◽  
Jennifer A. Sees ◽  
Bipin N. Savani ◽  
Nirali N. Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
Cd34 Cells

Introduction: Approximately 7% of unrelated hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors are asked to donate a subsequent time to the same or different recipient. In a recent large CIBMTR study of second time donors, Stroncek et al. incidentally found that second peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collections had lower total CD34+ cells, CD34+ cells per liter of whole blood processed, and CD34+ cells per kg donor weight. Based on smaller studies, the time between the two independent PBSC donations (inter-donation interval) as well as donor sex, race and baseline lymphocyte counts appear to influence CD34+ cell yields at subsequent donations. Our objective was to retrospectively evaluate factors contributory to CD34+ cell yields at subsequent PBSC donation amongst NMDP donors. Methods. The study population consisted of filgrastim (G-CSF) mobilized PBSC donors through the NMDP/CIBMTR between 2006 and 2017, with a subsequent donation of the same product. evaluated the impact of inter-donation interval, donor demographics (age, BMI, race, sex, G-CSF dose, year of procedure, need for central line) and changes in complete blood counts (CBC), on the CD34+ cell yields/liter (x106/L) of blood processed at second donation and pre-apheresis (Day 5) peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts/liter (x106/L) at second donation. Linear regression was used to model log cell yields as a function of donor and collection related variables, time between donations, and changes in baseline values from first to second donation. Stepwise model building, along with interactions among significant variables were assessed. The Pearson chi-square test or the Kruskal-Wallis test compared discrete variables or continuous variables, respectively. For multivariate analysis, a significance level of 0.01 was used due to the large number of variables considered. Results: Among 513 PBSC donors who subsequently donated a second PBSC product, clinically relevant decreases in values at the second donation were observed in pre-apheresis CD34+ cells (73.9 vs. 68.6; p=0.03), CD34+cells/L blood processed (32.2 vs. 30.1; p=0.06), and total final CD34+ cell count (x106) (608 vs. 556; p=0.02). Median time interval between first and second PBSC donations was 11.7 months (range: 0.3-128.1). Using the median pre-apheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts from donation 1 as the cut-off for high versus low mobilizers, we found that individuals who were likely to be high or low mobilizers at first donation were also likely to be high or low mobilizers at second donation, respectively (Table 1). This was independent of the inter-donation interval. In multivariate analyses, those with an inter-donation interval of >12 months, demonstrated higher CD34+cells/L blood processed compared to donors donating within a year (mean ratio 1.15, p<0.0001). Change in donor BMI was also a predictor for PBSC yields. If donor BMI decreased at second donation, so did the CD34+cells/L blood processed (0.74, p <0.0001). An average G-CSF dose above 960mcg was also associated with an increase in CD34+cells/L blood processed compared to donors who received less than 960mcg (1.04, p=0.005). (Table 2A). Pre-apheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cells on Day 5 of second donation were also affected by the inter-donation interval, with higher cell counts associated with a longer time interval (>12 months) between donations (1.23, p<0.0001). Further, independent of the inter-donation interval, GCSF doses greater than 960mcg per day associated with higher pre-apheresis CD34+ cells at second donation (1.26, p<0.0001); as was a higher baseline WBC count (>6.9) (1.3, p<0.0001) (Table 2B). Conclusions: In this large retrospective study of second time unrelated PBSC donors, a longer inter-donation interval was confirmed to be associated with better PBSC mobilization and collection. Given hematopoietic stem cell cycling times of 9-12 months in humans, where possible, repeat donors may be chosen based on these intervals to optimize PBSC yields. Changes in BMI are also to be considered while recruiting repeat donors. Some of these parameters may be improved marginally by increasing G-CSF dose within permissible limits. In most instances, however, sub-optimal mobilizers at first donation appear to donate suboptimal numbers of HSC at their subsequent donation. Disclosures Pulsipher: CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Bellicum: Consultancy; Amgen: Other: Lecture; Jazz: Other: Education for employees; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Honoraria. Shaw:Therakos: Other: Speaker Engagement.

scholarly journals Factors Influencing Long-Term Hematopoietic Function Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2186-2186
Author(s):  
Alissa Visram ◽  
Natasha Kekre ◽  
Christopher N. Bredeson ◽  
Jason Tay ◽  
Lothar B. Huebsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background/Objective: Mobilized peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cells are the most common stem cell source for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT). Successful short-term stem cell engraftment requires collection of at least 2x106 CD34+ cells/kg. The American Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT) recommends a stem cell infusion target of 3-5 x106 cells/kg (Giralt et al. 2014). However, the number of CD34+ cells to reinfuse to ensure long-term engraftment has not been established. Plerixafor, a reversible CXCR4 antagonist, increases CD34+ cell yield at collection even in patients who are predicted poor mobilizers (PPM). Although plerixafor could be used universally for all collections, this may not be the most cost-effective strategy (Veltri et al. 2012). This study sought to determine the minimum number of CD34+ cells/kg required for adequate long-term hematopoiesis, identify factors associated with poor long-term hematopoiesis, and determine if plerixafor mobilization improved long-term peripheral blood counts. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent auto-HSCT between January 2004 and September 2013 at The Ottawa Hospital, for management of hematological malignancies. Peripheral blood cell counts were collected from 1 to 5 years after auto-HSCT, or until disease relapse. Poor long-term hematopoiesis was defined as an ANC <1 x109/L, hemoglobin <100 g/L, or platelets <100 x109/L. Patients were stratified into groups based on the infused CD34+ concentration (in cells/kg), and the proportion of patients with poor long-term hematopoiesis at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post auto-HSCT was compared with chi square tests. Long-term clinical outcomes (platelet and packed red blood cell transfusions, and post auto-HSCT infection rates) were compared between plerixafor-mobilized patients and PPM (defined as patients with pre-collection CD34+ <2 x 106 cells/kg) with standard mobilization regimens. Results: This study included 560 patients who underwent auto-HSCT, 210 with multiple myeloma and 350 with lymphoma. At 1 and 5 years post auto-HSCT 377 and 104 patients were included, respectively. A dose dependent improvement 1 year after auto-HSCT was seen in patients who received 0-2.99 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg (24.4%, n= 41) compared to patients who received 5-9.99 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg (11%, n=154, p=0.051) and ³10 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg (4.5%, n=66, p=0.006). Though there was a trend towards lower CD34+ infusions and poorer hematopoietic function (see table 1), there was no statistically significant difference in hematopoietic function based on CD34+ infusion concentrations after 1 year post auto-HSCT. 10 patients received <2 x106 CD34+ cells/kg, of whom the rate of inadequate hematopoiesis was 33% at 1 year (n=6) and 0% (n=1) at 5 years post auto-HSCT. Factors that increased the risk of poor hematopoiesis over the course of study follow up, based on a univariate analysis, included advanced age (OR 1.189, p=0.05), multiple prior collections (OR 2.978, p=0.035), and prior treatment with more than two chemotherapy lines (OR 2.571, p=0.02). Plerixafor-mobilized patients (n=25), compared to PPM (n=197), had a significantly higher median CD34+ cell collection (4.048 x109/L and 2.996 x109/L cells/kg, respectively, p=0.005). There was no significant difference in overall cytopenias, transfusion requirements, or infection rates between plerixafor-mobilized and PPM patients over the course of the study follow up. Conclusion: Low pre-collection CD34+ counts, advanced age, multiple prior collections, and more than two prior chemotherapy treatments adversely affected long-term hematopoiesis post auto-HSCT. We support the transfusion target of 3-5 x 106 cells/kg, as proposed by the ASBMT, given that at 5 years post auto-HSCT there was no statistical or clinically significant difference in hematopoietic function with higher CD34+ infusion targets. While mobilization with plerixafor significantly increased overall CD34+ cell collection when compared with PPM, long-term hematopoietic function and clinical outcomes were not different. This finding supports the practise of limiting plerixafor use only to patients who are PPM, thereby facilitating adequate stem cell collection and early engraftment, as opposed to universal plerixafor mobilization. Disclosures Sabloff: Lundbeck: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria.

Proteasome Inhibitor Treatment in Multiple Myeloma Can Mobilize Hematopoietic Stem Cells in the Absence of G-CSF

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2452-2452
Author(s):  
John N. Allan ◽  
David Jayabalan ◽  
Ruben Niesvizky ◽  
Tomer M Mark ◽  
Roger Pearse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitor ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Fold Change ◽  
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

Abstract Introduction Proteasome inhibitor (PI) use in patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) has been associated with increased hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) collection yields in both induction and autologous stem cell collection settings (Niesvizky et al., 2013). Animal models have confirmed this observation (Ghobadi et al., 2012). The mechanism remains unclear, but there is suggestion PI treatment affects pathways associated with HSPC anchoring and migration (Niesvizky et al., 2013). The effect of PIs on HSPC migration in the absence of filgastrim (G-CSF) stimulation remains unknown. We sought to characterize the molecular mechanisms of HSPC mobilization in a cohort of pts undergoing active PI treatment. Methods MM pts undergoing treatment with PIs were consented to obtain peripheral blood (PB) under IRB approval. Pts were eligible if they had symptomatic MM and were undergoing treatment with a PI. Pts receiving alkylating chemotherapy (such as cyclophosphamide) in combination with a PI were excluded. Pts were enrolled on the first day of a new cycle containing a PI. PB was drawn prior to administration of the PI (T0) and just prior to the next dose of PI, 24 or 72 hours later (T1), depending on whether the pt was receiving carfilzomib or bortezomib, respectively. PB mononuclear cells were collected and purified with Ficoll-Paque, viably frozen in CS-10 freezing medium and stored in liquid nitrogen. Serum samples were collected after a 1:2 dilution with PBS and stored at -80oF. Cells were later thawed to perform multiparameter flow cytometry and colony forming unit (CFU) assays. Multiparameter flow cytometry was performed using a BD LSR-II and analyzed using FloJo V9.0 software. Cells were gated on CD45dim SSC-lo characteristics. HSPCs were defined as CD34+/CD133+. Pts were stratified into 3 groups (>2, 1-2, <1) based on fold change in peripheral HSPCs from baseline T0. Expression of surface markers including CD38, CD184, CD202b, CD25, CD90 and CD31 within the HSPC population, were analyzed. Serum protein concentrations were analyzed using ELISAs. Results Twenty-three pts consented and collected at the 2 prespecified time points. Six pts (26%) increased the percentage of peripheral HSPCs>2 fold. Nine (39%) and 8 (35%) pts increased the percentage of HSPCs 1-2 fold and <1 fold over T0 percentage, respectively. There were no statistical differences within the 3 groups, in baseline characteristics, prior chemotherapy, use of IMIDs, or radiation exposure history. There was a significant positive correlation between peripheral HSPC fold change and CFU formation p=0.003 indicating the mobilized HSPC population’s capacity to form progeny. Furthermore, there was a significant negative correlation between fold change of HSPCs and CD90 expression on CD34+ CD133+ CD38- stem cell populations at T1 p=0.032. To determine changes in serum proteins as a result of PI treatment that could contribute to HSPC mobilization we evaluated TGF-ß levels in 13 pt plasma samples. Two pts from the>2fold group were available and revealed TGF-ß levels increase 67.24 pg/mL compared to a decrease of 17.67 pg/mL in 5 pts in the <1fold group trending towards significance p=0.094. Baseline levels of TGF-ß in the two groups,>2fold and <1fold were 18.1 pg/mL and 30.1 pg/mL respectively, which was not significant. Discussion Observations have noted increased HSPC yields in animal models and MM pts after treatment with PIs in both induction and mobilizing regimens (Ghobadi et al., 2012; Niesvizky et al., 2013). Here we demonstrate that treatment with PIs is associated with increases in peripheral HSPC percentages in approximately 2/3 of MM pts despite the lack of concurrent G-CSF. Decreased CD90 has previously been observed in peripherally mobilized HSPC products and, similar to TGF-ß, plays a role in regulation of Rhokinase GTPase pathways known to affect migration and adherence of many different cell types (Tsuchiya et al., 1997; Kim et al., 2006; Wen et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2014). Our study shows a correlation between decreased CD90 expression and fold increase of peripheral HSPCs. We also found an increase in TGF-ß serum levels after treatment in the>2fold group compared to the <1fold group, which may approach statistical significance with more sampling. These findings may help understand the failure to collect adequate HSPCs in a subset of MM pts and could highlight new pathways to disrupt and improve HSPC mobilization regimens. Disclosures Niesvizky: Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Mark:Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rossi:Celgene: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Donor Lymphocyte Infusions for Relapsed Hematological Malignancies after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Single Center Experience

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4673-4673
Author(s):  
Gunhan Gurman ◽  
Guldane Cengiz Seval ◽  
Sinem Civriz Bozdag ◽  
Selami Kocak Toprak ◽  
Meltem Kurt Yuksel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Support Research

Abstract Introduction:Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is one of the therapeutic options for patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). DLI can augment the graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect; however, it can sometimes induce severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and infectious complications induced by bone marrow aplasia or immunosuppressive therapy. In this study, we wanted to assess the risk factors for GVHD and transplant-related mortality (TRM) as well as disease outcomes according to the reason for DLI in patients who received DLI after allo-HSCT. Patients and Methods:We retrospectively analyzed 152 patients with various hematological malignancies who received a total of 250 DLI in our center between March 1991 and July 2018 for disease relapse and at different intervals after allo-HSCT. We used our institutional database to evaluate details and characteristics of patients and DLI outcomes. The probabilities of overall survival were calculated from the day of transplantation with Kaplan-Meier analysis using SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics 21; IBM Corp., Chicago, IL) statistical tool kit. Results:Median patient age was 34 years (range, 14-67 years); the patient cohort included 96 males (63.2%) and 36.8 female (56%). Patients evaluated in this study were adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (n=64), chronic myeloid leukemia (n=36), multiple myeloma (n=6), non-hodgkin lymphoma (4), primary myelofibrosis (n=6), myelodisplastic syndrome (n=3), and severe aplastic anemia (n=3). One hundred thirty-six (10.5%) and sixteen (10.5%) patients had sibling (SD) and unrelated donors (UD), respectively. The stem cell source was peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in 116 patients (76.3%) and the other 36 patients (23.8%) received bone marrow stem cells (BMSC). Patients underwent an allo-HSCT with a MAC (n= 109) or RIC (n=43) regimens at a median of 12.5 months from diagnosis. Cyclosporine and methotrexate were used as the main graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in our cohort. All patients received DLI for relapse or progression. Median number of DLI was 1 (range, 1-5), the median interval between transplant and first DLI was 6 months (range, 3-86 months), median number of infused CD3+cells x 106/kg of recipient body weight was 1.5x107(range, 0.5x107- 11.1x107). The median time from relapse to the first DLI was 1.9 months (range, 0.1-32.7 months). Thirty-one patients (21%) developed acute grade II to IV GVHD and 10 patients (7%) developed extensive chronic GVHD. We could not demonstrate the higher CD3+ cell dose of DLI associated with an increased risk of GVHD. Furthermore, none of our patients presented graft hypoplasia after DLI. At a median follow-up from transplantation interval of 16.3 months (range, 0.5-188.2 months), 35 patients were still alive (%60). The OS at 1 and 3 years was 63.4±0.4 and 28.2±0.4, respectively (Figure 1). The primary cause of death was relapse of the original disease in most of the patients, whereas 14 patients died of TRM (15.3%). Discussion:Various modifications of DLI have been investigated in combination with molecular-targeted agents to enhance the antitumor effect while minimizing GVHD. Therefore, further studies of larger randomized cohorts with high quality data management are required to clarify the role of DLI in relapsed hematological malignancies. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Civriz Bozdag: TAKEDA: Consultancy; MSD: Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Consultancy. Özcan:MSD: Other: travel support, Research Funding; Jazz: Other; Janssen: Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Archigen: Research Funding; Jazz: Other: Travel support; Bayer: Research Funding; Abbvie: Other: Travel payment; Celgene: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel payment, Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding. Ilhan:Roche: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau. Beksac:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen,Janssen-Cilag,Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Impact of ABO Mismatch on Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Recipients: 30 Years of Experience with 1016 Patients

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3472-3472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erden Atilla ◽  
Pervin Topcuoglu ◽  
Erman Akkus ◽  
Pinar Ataca Atilla ◽  
Sinem Civriz Bozdag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Vs Host Disease ◽  
Engraftment Failure ◽  
Support Research

Abstract Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is widely used to treat malignant and non-malignant hematological diseases. The impact of ABO mismatch on outcome following transplantation remains controversial. In this study, our aim is to define effects of ABO mismatch on engraftment, graft vs host disease, relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients who underwent allo-HSCT. Patients and Methods: Between 1988 and 2016, we retrospectively identified 1016 patients who underwent allo-HSCT at Ankara University School of Medicine, Department of Hematology. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used where appropriate in comparison. Cox regression model and Kaplan Meier curves were applied for survival analysis. P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: The median follow-up period was 34.7 months (range, 0.2-229). In our cohort, there were 420 (41.3%) ABO-mismatched transplants occurred including 167 (16.4%) major, 197 (19.4%) minor and 55 (5.4%) bidirectional mismatches. The pre-transplant characteristics of patients are summarized in table. Allo-HSCTs from unrelated donors and peripheral blood grafts were detected higher in ABO mismatched patients vs ABO matched patients (28% vs 11%, P<0.0001; 78% vs 67%, P<0.0001). The engraftment failure was higher in ABO mismatch group compared to ABO matched group (67 (16%) vs 70 (11%), P=0.05). Neutrophil and platelet engraftment rates were not statistically different in major, minor or bidirectional ABO mismatched vs matched donors. The acute graft vs host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD incidences did not alter in patients with ABO match and mismatch (44% vs 45%, P=0.78; 41% vs 39%,P=0.81). In ABO-mismatched group, hemolysis after infusion of graft occurred in 50 patients (12%) whereas during engraftment in 35 patients (8%). Although not statistically significant, hemolysis were occurred higher in major ABO mismatch. Plasma exchanges were performed in 18 patients in the major ABO mismatched group due to high anti-donor type isoagglutinin titers (≥1/128). Pure red cell aplasia was diagnosed in 5 (3%) major ABO mismatched patients. Major ABO mismatch (HR:1.46, 95% Cl:1.06-2.03;P=0.022) was found to be related with lower RFS and OS (HR:1.31, 95% Cl:1.06-1.62;P=0.013). 3-year OS and 1-year RFS were lower with major ABO mismatch (38% vs 47%, P=0.02; 15% vs 24%; P=0.02) (Figure). Conclusion: Engraftment failure was detected higher in patients with ABO mismatch as well as major ABO mismatch was related with lower RFS and OS although the cohort is heterogeneous. Close monitoring and early treatment strategies for expectable complications would reduce the number fatal events by ABO mismatched allo-HSCT. Disclosures Civriz Bozdag: NOVARTIS: Consultancy; MSD: Research Funding; TAKEDA: Consultancy. Özcan:Abbvie: Other: Travel payment; Bayer: Research Funding; MSD: Other: travel support, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Jazz: Other; Jazz: Other: Travel support; Archigen: Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel payment, Research Funding. Beksac:Deva: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Ilhan:Roche: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Treosulfan, Fludarabine and Cytarabine As Conditioning before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5702-5702
Author(s):  
Inken Hilgendorf ◽  
Nils Winkelmann ◽  
Jochen J Frietsch ◽  
Friederike Hunstig ◽  
Ulf Schnetzke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Unrelated Donors ◽  
Risk Of Relapse ◽  
Support Research

Abstract Background: The combination of treosulfan witth fludarabine was successfully introduced into toxicity-reduced conditioning regimens for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). However, the risk of post-HCT relapse remains of concern. Here we report for the first time on the results of an individual treatment approach with treosulfan, fludarabin and cytarabine as conditioning for allogeneic HCT in patients with AML, MPN or MDS. Methods: 22 patients were treated with fludarabine 30 mg/m² given on day -6 to day -2, treosulfan 14 g/m² administered on days -4 to day -2 and cytarabin 2g/m² given on days -6 and -5. GvHD-prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine A and methotrexate or MMF. In addition, antithymocyte globulin was applied in case of an unrelated donor. One patient received bone marrow and the remaining patients received peripheral blood stem cells from matched related donors (9%), matched unrelated donors (73%) or mismatched unrelated donors (18%). All patients were considered to have high risk of relapse because of unfavourable cytogenetic features and/or insufficient or missing response to previous treatment. Three patients (14 %) with CML after blast crisis received the combination because of the reported high relapse rate (46%) after three-day scheduled conditioning with treosulfan [1]. In addition, patients were considered to be ineligible for myeloablative standard conditioning because of multi-morbidity (n = 4; 18% with HCT-CI >2) and/or age >55 years (n = 14; 64%). Results: The median age of patients was 59 (35-68) years. Patients suffered from acute myeloid leukemia (n = 14, 64%), myeloproliferative neoplasia (n = 6, 27%) or myelodysplasic syndrome (n = 2, 9%). The conditioning regime was well tolerated and nearly all patients engrafted and achieved complete donor-type chimerism, except for one who died very early from sepsis. Another patient with underlying myelofibrosis suffered from secondary graft failure on day 100. Two patients developed aGVHD °III/ IV. None of the patients suffered from veno-occlusive disease or severe chronic GVHD. Overall survival and event-free survival at one year reached 60.2% and 59.6%, respectively. Six patients died from infectious disease, two from relapse and one patient from acute GVHD °IV. Conclusion: The combination of cytarabine with the established conditioning of treosulfan and fludarabine is feasible in patients with high risk of relapse and ineligible for myeloablative standard conditioning. Holowiecki J, Giebel S, Wojnar J et al. Treosulfan and fludarabine low-toxicity conditioning for allogeneic 334 haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in chronic myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol 335 2008; 142(2): 284-92. Disclosures Hilgendorf: Novartis: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Medac: Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Frietsch:Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding. Scholl:Abbivie: Other: Travel support; MDS: Other: Travel support; Novartis: Other: Travel support; Carreras Foundation: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Alexion: Other: Travel support. Hochhaus:Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Casper:Medac: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grant, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Blinatumomab Consolidation Post Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3-4
Author(s):  
Armin Ghobadi ◽  
Michael P. Rettig ◽  
Amanda F Cashen ◽  
Leah Gehrs ◽  
Stephanie Christ ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Pet Ct

Introduction: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is the standard treatment for patients with chemo-sensitive relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, post-auto-HCT outcomes are still poor in this population, with 5-year progression free survival (PFS) of 40%. We hypothesize that in patients with DLBCL, blinatumomab consolidation post auto-HCT will eradicate remaining tumor cells, leading to decreased relapse and increased overall survival. Therefore we conducted a pilot study to test blinatumomab as consolidation therapy post auto-HCT for patients with DLBCL. Methods: Adult patients with chemosensitive DLBCL or transformed FL who underwent auto-HCT were included. All patients received one cycle of blinatumomab consolidation starting 42 days post auto-HCT (9 mcg daily as continuous infusion for 7 days, followed by 28 mcg daily for 21 days). Response evaluation was done at day 100 post auto-HCT. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was quantified by immunoglobulin high-throughput sequencing (Ig-HTS) of plasma cell-free DNA on days 42 post auto-HCT (pre-blinatumomab) and on day 100 post auto-HSCT (one month post completion of blinatumomab). Immunophenotyping of T cells in cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected on day 42 (pre-blinatumomab), day 56 (midpoint of blinatumomab treatment cycle), and day 100 (1 month post blinatumomab) was performed using 18-color flow cytometry panels for extracellular and intracellular antigens. Results: As of August 2020, ten patients have been treated with at least 100 days follow up. Patient characteristics and outcomes are summarized in Table 1. Three out of 10 patients (30%) were in partial remission (PR) as determined by CT or PET/CT imaging before auto-HCT. All subjects completed the planned cycle of blinatumomab consolidation. Blinatumomab was well tolerated. Two patients developed grade 1 CRS, with no grade 2 and higher CRS. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was not observed. Six patients developed transient tremor (four grade 1, one grade 2, and one grade 3). One subjects developed BCNU pneumonitis and CMV viremia that resolved with steroid and ganciclovir. One hundred days post auto-HCT (one month post blinatumomab consolidation) 10/10 (100%) of patient were in complete remission (CR) as determined by both MRD testing and by CT or PET/CT imaging. Plasma cell free based MRD was positive on day 42 (post auto-HCT and pre-blinatumomab), in two out of ten patients (20%). These two patients achieved MRD negative status after receiving blinatumomab consolidation. With median follow up of 14.5 months (range: 7-34 months), all 10 patients are alive and 6/10 remain in remission.. Interestingly, the 4 patients with disease relapse had lower CD8/CD4 T cell ratio before starting blinatumomab compared with patients who remained in remission (Figure 1A). However, there were no significant differences in the distribution of the major T cell subtypes (naïve, memory, effector and Treg), and expression of markers of T cell activation, proliferation, or exhaustion (Figure 1B-1E). High dimensional analysis with t-stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) revealed a cluster of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells characterized by high expression of granzyme B (GB) and perforin that was present in the DLBCL patients before and after blinatumomab treatment but not in a healthy untreated control (Figure 1F-1H). Although further analysis of healthy untreated controls and pre-transplant samples is needed, CD8+ T cells from these DLBCL patients pre-blinatumomab contained very few naïve cells and were enriched for terminally differentiated effector cells. Conclusion: This pilot study shows that blinatumomab consolidation post auto-HCT is safe and well tolerated. MRD response to blinatumomab in all patients with MRD positive disease post auto-HCT is encouraging. Strategies to increase CD8/CD4 ratio and more cycles of consolidation in a larger randomized trial are needed to confirm the efficacy of consolidation with blinatumomab post auto-HCT. Finally, the unusually "high activation" immunophenotype (Teff/GB+) seen in CD8 T cells of DLBCL patients after auto-HCT (compared to those seen in resting peripheral blood) may both impact the response to blinatumomab and provide key insights into optimal timing for administration after auto-HCT. Disclosures Ghobadi: WuGen: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; EUSA: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mehta-Shah:Bristol Myers-Squibb: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Corvus: Research Funding; Genetech/Roche: Research Funding; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy. Kahl:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics LLC: Consultancy; Roche Laboratories Inc: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy. DiPersio:Magenta Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Blinatumomab for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in Adults with B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (BCP-ALL): Median Overall Survival (OS) Is Not Reached in Complete MRD Responders at a Median Follow-up of 53.1 Months

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 554-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Goekbuget ◽  
Hervé Dombret ◽  
Gerhard Zugmaier ◽  
Massimiliano Bonifacio ◽  
Carlos Graux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complete Remission ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Support Research

Abstract Background: When adults with BCP-ALL achieve hematologic complete remission with intense chemotherapy, approximately 30% have persistent or recurrent MRD by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction or flow cytometry (Brüggemann et al, Blood 2006;107:1116-23). MRD is the strongest predictor of relapse in BCP-ALL. Blinatumomab is a bispecific antibody construct that redirects T cells to kill CD19+ target cells. In a multinational, single-arm study (BLAST; NCT01207388) in adults with BCP-ALL and presence of MRD, we previously reported that 78% (88/113) of evaluable patients achieved a complete MRD response after cycle 1 of blinatumomab treatment (Gökbuget et al, Blood 2018;131:1522-31). Patient incidences of grade 3 or 4 adverse events, including neurologic events (13%) or cytokine release syndrome (2%), were consistent with previous blinatumomab studies. After a minimum patient follow-up of 18 months, median OS was 36.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.8 to not estimable). Objective: This report describes long-term OS for adults with BCP-ALL and MRD, with a minimum patient follow-up of 3 years after blinatumomab treatment. Methods: The BLAST study enrolled adults with BCP-ALL in first (CR1) or subsequent (CR2+) hematologic complete remission after at least 3 intensive chemotherapy blocks, with MRD (at least 10-3) at least 2 weeks after the last chemotherapy. All patients received blinatumomab 15 µg/m2 per day for up to 4 cycles. Each cycle was 4 weeks of continuous infusion and 2 weeks off. Complete MRD response was defined as no target amplification, with a minimum sensitivity of 10-4. After MRD response assessment at the end of cycle 1, patients could undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) at any time. Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS were determined, overall and by complete MRD response in cycle 1, after long-term follow-up (a minimum patient follow-up of 3 years). A conditional landmark of 45 days (the end of cycle 1) was used for the subgroup analyses by complete MRD response. Results: Of the 116 patients with MRD who received blinatumomab, OS was evaluated for the 110 patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) BCP-ALL and less than 5% blasts at enrollment, including 74 who received HSCT while in continuous complete remission (CCR) after blinatumomab. With a median follow-up of 53.1 months, median OS was 36.5 months (95% CI: 22.0 to not estimable), and a plateau was reached (Figure 1A). In this analysis, 30 of 74 (40.5%) patients with HSCT in CCR and 12 of 36 (33.3%) patients without HSCT were alive in CCR. Analyses of OS by complete MRD response after cycle 1 in 107 patients excluded those with no central MRD assay (n=1) or inadequate MRD test sensitivity (n=2). In this population, median OS was not estimable (95% CI: 27.3 months to not estimable) among complete MRD responders (n=85) and 12.5 months (95% CI: 3.2 to 39.7) among MRD nonresponders (n=22; p=.002 by log-rank test; Figure 1B). In the subset of patients who received HSCT in CCR, median OS from HSCT was not estimable (95% CI: 25.7 months to not estimable) among complete MRD responders (n=61) and 16.1 months (95% CI: 1.1 to not estimable) among MRD nonresponders (n=10). In the subset of patients with MRD in CR1, median OS was not estimable (95% CI: 29.5 months to not estimable) among complete MRD responders (n=60) and 10.6 months (95% CI: 2.7 to 39.7) among MRD nonresponders (n=13). Conclusions: In this multinational study of adults with BCP-ALL in hematologic complete remission with persistent MRD or MRD relapse at baseline, median OS was 36.5 months after blinatumomab treatment, with median long-term follow-up of 53.1 months, and OS reached a plateau. Median OS was not estimable (ie, not reached) among the patients who had achieved a complete MRD response after cycle 1 of blinatumomab treatment, or among the subsets of patients who had achieved a complete MRD response with blinatumomab either in CR1 or with subsequent HSCT in CCR. These results provide further support for the long-term benefits in OS associated with blinatumomab treatment in adults with BCP-ALL and MRD. Disclosures Goekbuget: Kite / Gilead: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Dombret:Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad (Incyte): Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ambit (Daiichi Sankyo): Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Immunogen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cellectis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Menarini: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shire-Baxalta: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Zugmaier:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Employment, Patents & Royalties: 20170327581, 9688760, 20170122947, 9486475, 20160208001, 9192665, 20150071928, 8840888, 20140227272, 20140228316, 20130323247, 20130287774, 20130287778, 20110262440, 20100112603, 7700299, 20070037228. Bonifacio:Incyte: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Topp:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding. Brüggemann:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; PRMA: Consultancy; Affimed: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Regeneron: Research Funding. Taylor:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bargou:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cellex: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gemoab: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: Blinatumomab.

scholarly journals Comparision of Outcomes According to HLA Disparity in Acute Leukemia Patients: A Single Center Institution Experience

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5776-5776
Author(s):  
Pervin Topcuoglu ◽  
Guldane Cengiz Seval ◽  
Sinem Civriz Bozdag ◽  
Selami Kocak Toprak ◽  
Meltem Kurt Yuksel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Matched Sibling ◽  
Support Research

Abstract Introduction:Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) still remains the only established curative approach for the treatment of acute leukemia (AL). HLA-matched sibling or relative donor (MRD) is considered the optimal donor source but when this is not available, a matched unrelated donor (MUD) is considered the best alternative. Prior studies reported comparable results of Allo-HSCT from MSD versus MUD. In this retrospective, single center review, we aimed to compare the transplantation outcomes after 10/10 or 9/10 HLA-matched related to unrelated donor transplantation in adults with AL. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 363 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of AL who underwent their first Allo-HSCT between January 2005 and April 2018, using matched 10/10 MRD (n= 244) and MUD (n=54) or mismatched-UD (mmUD) (n=65) at Ankara University School of Medicine, Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit. Patients transplanted using cord blood or haploidentical donors were excluded to homogenously compare adult full-matched sibling or unrelated donors in the acute leukemia setting. Parameters evaluated included hematopoietic engraftment, disease relapse, transplant related complications, mortality, overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) from transplantation, and the incidence and severity of acute and chronic GVHD. Results:Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median age was similar in all groups at the time of transplantation (p= 0.9). Median follow-up from the transplantation for all patients was 25 months (range, 1- 152.8) but median follow up was longer in the MRD group (33.6 months [range, 1-152.8]) than in the MUD and (13.3 months [range, 1-121.5]and mmUD groups (22.3 months [range, 2.3-129.4]and p=0.011). In the MRD group, 90.9% received a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen, while in the MUD and mmUD groups, 73.1% and 81.3% received a MAC regimen (p=0,001). Cyclosporine and methotrexate were used as the main graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in all groups. The proportion of patients who received in vivo T cell depletion significantly differed among the two groups (6.6% in the MRD group, 92.6% in the MUD group and 50.8% in the mmUD group, p=0.000). Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) was the main stem cell source in all groups (92.2% in the MRD group vs. 90.7% in the MUD group vs. 95.4% mmUD, p<0.1). Most of the patients (94.3%) achieved hematopoietic engraftment, graft failure occurred in 4.5%, 7.4% and 9.2% in MRD, MUD and mmUD groups, respectively (p>0.1). The median time for neutrophil and platelet engraftments was seen faster in MRD group compared to MUD and mmUD (p<0.0001).According to the type of donor the incidence of grades II-IV acute GVHD were similar among MRD, MUD and mmUD (22.1%, 24.1% and 18.5%, respectively). But lower incidence of chronic GVHD was observed post-HSCT with a mmUD than a MSD; 22.2% for MUD, 32.3% for mmUD and 55.6% for MRD (p>0.1). No statistical significance was observed for transplant related mortality (TRM) in terms of the type of donor (MUD group. mmUD groupand MRD group; 22.2%, 23.1% and 18.0%, p=0.572). Relapse incidence was similar among the groups (MRD vs. MUD vs. mmUD; 33.6% vs. 29.8% vs. 30.8%, p=0.807). Two-year leukemia free- and overall survival were not affected the donor types (Figure-1).. Conclusion:Our results suggest that, when an HLA-identical sibling donor is not available for an adult with AL who is otherwise a candidate for Allo-HSCT, a 10/10 or 9/10 UD may be used with the expectation of similar rates of TRM, LFS and OS at 2 years. Disclosures Civriz Bozdag: NOVARTIS: Consultancy; MSD: Research Funding; TAKEDA: Consultancy. Özcan:Jazz: Other: Travel support; BMS: Honoraria; MSD: Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Abbvie: Other: Travel payment; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel payment, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Archigen: Research Funding; MSD: Other: travel support, Research Funding; Jazz: Other. Ilhan:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau. Beksac:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen,Janssen-Cilag,Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Intensification of Chemotherapy Using a Modified BFM Backbone for Children, Adolescents and Young Adults with T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL) and T-Cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LL) Identifies Highly Chemorefractory Patients Who Benefit from Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3487-3487
Author(s):  
Paul Harker-Murray ◽  
Brent L. Wood ◽  
Meenakshi Devidas ◽  
Zhiguo Chen ◽  
Tal Schechter-Finkelstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Induction Failure ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: The prognosis for patients (pts) with relapsed T-ALL and T-LL is dismal. The primary goal of T-ALL/T-LL treatment is to prevent relapse. In the phase 3 Children's Oncology Group (COG) clinical trial AALL1231 (NCT02112916), children, adolescents and young adults (age 1-30 years) with T-ALL and T-LL were treated with a modified augmented BFM (aBFM) backbone that used dexamethasone as the only corticosteroid and included two (rather than one) doses of pegaspargase during induction and delayed intensification. Pts were stratified as standard (SR), intermediate (IR), or very high risk (VHR), primarily based on disease response: morphology, minimal residual disease (MRD) performed by multiparameter flow cytometry at a central reference laboratory) at end of induction and consolidation (T-ALL), and radiographic response for T-LL. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive/not receive bortezomib during induction and delayed intensification (1.3mg/m 2 x 4 doses per block). VHR T-ALL pts were defined as having day 29 M3 marrow (&gt;25% blasts) or end of consolidation (EOC) MRD &gt;0.1%. 10-15% of T-ALL pts were predicted to be VHR based on COG AALL0434. Pts with induction failure (M3 marrow by morphology) or EOC MRD &gt;0.1% were expected to have 4-yr event-free survival (EFS) of ~66+/-16%. Following consolidation, VHR pts received 3 BFM-based intensification blocks in lieu of interim maintenance (IM). Detectable MRD following the intensification blocks was considered an event and these pts were removed from protocol therapy. VHR ALL pts who had undetectable MRD continued protocol therapy, received delayed intensification, an IM phase with Capizzi escalating methotrexate plus pegaspargase, and maintenance. A secondary aim of AALL1231 was to compare survival in VHR T-ALL pts with EOC MRD ≥ 0.1% but undetectable MRD after intensification of chemotherapy with those who continued to have detectable MRD and were eligible for other treatment strategies, including hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). This study also analyzed outcomes for pts with M3 marrow at the end of induction. Results: AALL1231 accrued 847 pts (824 eligible and evaluable) of 1400 anticipated from 2014 until early closure. The 3-year EFS for the bortezomib randomization for the SR and IR groups has been reported previously (Teachey, et. al ASH 2020). Because only 2 of 209 T-LL pts were VHR; this report focuses on the outcomes of the 5.2% (32/615) of T-ALL pts who were VHR. In total, 25 VHR T-ALL pts were EOC MRD &gt;0.1%, and 18 of these had MRD sent at the end of HR intensification. Of the 8 pts who became MRD undetectable and continued protocol therapy, only 2 survived (3-year overall survival [OS] 25+15.3%). In contrast, 10 pts who had detectable MRD were taken off protocol and underwent HSCT. Of these 10, only one relapsed (3-year OS 90+12.7%). The 3-year OS for the 10 pts who were M3 at Day 29 was 60.0±17.0%. As there were not enough pts to assess the impact of EOC MRD on pts who were M3 at Day 29, we assessed the impact of EOC MRD on outcomes in M2 (5-25% blasts at Day 29; n = 24) and M3 pts, which defines induction failure in other cooperative groups. M2+M3 T-ALL who were EOC MRD &lt;0.1% (n = 15) had 3-year OS of 86.7±10.0% vs 45.5±15.0% for those with EOC MRD &gt;0.1% (n = 12) pts. Conclusions: T-ALL pts treated on AALL1231 who are EOC MRD ≥0.1% with undetectable MRD after 3 BFM-based intensification blocks had a very poor outcome when treated with standard cytotoxic chemotherapy. In contrast, while patient numbers are small, those pts that remained MRD-positive after 3 intensification blocks and underwent HSCT had an excellent outcome. These data not only impact the recommended treatment for T-ALL pts who are induction and consolidation failures, but also support the importance of the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect in refractory T-ALL. Disclosures Hayashi: Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy. August: Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hermiston: Sobi: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Bollard: Cabeletta Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Catamaran Bio and Mana Therapeutics: Other: member and cofounder; SOBI: Other: DSMB. Loh: MediSix therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Raetz: Pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Other: DSMB member. Teachey: BEAM Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; NeoImmune Tech: Research Funding; Sobi: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document