scholarly journals Early Experience Using Radiotherapy As a Salvage Treatment for Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas Following CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor Modified T-Cell Therapy

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3244-3244
Author(s):  
Brandon Imber ◽  
M. Lia Palomba ◽  
Carl DeSelm ◽  
Parastoo B. Dahi ◽  
Craig S. Sauter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family Member ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Chimeric Antigen Receptor ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Antigen Receptor ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor modified T-cells (CAR T) produce remarkable responses for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma but over half of patients will relapse. Disease progression post CAR T therapy remains challenging and without standard guidelines. Radiotherapy is potentially an important salvage approach, but limited data exists to guide optimal utilization. We reviewed the first 15 patients treated with salvage radiotherapy (SRT) following CAR T progression. All but two patients had DLBCL; one had blastoid variant mantle cell lymphoma and the other patient was best classified as a CD5+ high grade lymphoma not otherwise specified. Outcomes included post RT response, freedom from subsequent relapse (FFSR) and overall survival (OS). Patients were heterogeneous and heavily-treated with a median of 4 prior lines of pre-CAR T therapy (range 2-8). Median time to first post-CAR T relapse was 82 days and RT was part of the first salvage regimen for 73%. Most received SRT to a site that was previously avid pre-CAR T. Post SRT, there were 6 evaluable patients with limited stage relapse; objective response rate was 100% (n=3 CR and n=3 PR). For advanced-stage relapse, while many had in-field PR, nearly all had concomitant out-of-field progression. Median OS from first post-CAR T relapse was 11 months. Patients with localized vs. advanced stage relapse had significantly improved FFSR (hazard ratio, HR=0.11, p=0.009) and OS (HR 0.10, p=0.003). By second-line age-adjusted IPI (sAA-IPI), 40% were low or low-intermediate risk and lower sAA-IPI risk prognosticated improved OS post SRT (p=0.004). Four patients were bridged to allogeneic transplantation with SRT and at analysis, 3 were alive and NED with 4.9, 7.2 and 36.2 months of post-allogeneic transplant follow-up. The fourth patient was also NED but deceased from transplant-related complications. SRT following CAR T is feasible with powerful and diverse utility including local palliation for transplant-ineligible patients. For lower risk and localized relapses, SRT may be integrated with novel targeted agents, immunotherapies or transplantation to attempt durable remissions. Disclosures Palomba: Hemedicus: Other: Immediate Family Member, Speakers Bureau ; Merck & Co Inc.: Other: Immediate Family Member, Consultancy (includes expert testimony); Seres Therapeutics: Other: Immediate Family Member, Equity Ownership and Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; STRAXIMM: Other: Immediate Family Member, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Other: Immediate Family Member, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Noble Insights: Consultancy; Evelo: Other: Immediate family member, Equity Ownership; MSK (IP for Juno and Seres): Other: Immediate Family Member, Patents & Royalties - describe: intellectual property rights . Sauter:Novartis: Consultancy; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy. Scordo:Angiocrine Bioscience, Inc.: Consultancy; McKinsey & Company: Consultancy. Batlevi:Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Park:Allogene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Shah:Janssen: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Giralt:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Perales:NexImmune: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MolMed: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Medigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyte/Gilead: Research Funding; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Bellicum: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Nektar Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sadelain:Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Employment.

scholarly journals CD30-Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cells for Therapy of Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 680-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos A. Ramos ◽  
Mrinalini Bilgi ◽  
Claudia P. Gerken ◽  
Olga Dakhova ◽  
Zhuyong Mei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Chimeric Antigen Receptor ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Antigen Receptor ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract CD19-specific CAR-T cells are highly successful against B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas and acute lymphoblastic leukemia but targets for other lymphoproliferative disorders have been harder to define. Almost all HL and some NHL express the CD30 antigen both at diagnosis and relapse, and monoclonal antibodies (mAb) targeting CD30 (e.g. brentuximab) produce objective antitumor responses. However, mAb have limited bio-distribution and their benefits may be short-lived. We therefore expressed the antigen binding domain of a CD30 mAb as part of a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) on T cells, coupled to the CD28 and z chain endodomains. We have previously published results of a phase 1 study of activated autologous CD30.CAR-T cells (CD30.CARTs) infused in patients with relapsed/refractory CD30+ HL or NHL without preceding chemotherapy (Ramos et al., J Clin Invest 2017). Of 6 patients with relapsed active HL, 1 entered complete remission (CR) that has lasted more than 3 years, and 3 had transient stable disease. No significant toxicities were observed. In order to boost the in vivo expansion and potentially the efficacy of these CD30.CARTs we are now infusing them after lymphodepleting chemotherapy (RELY-30, NCT02917083). We report here preliminary results of that study, which suggest a substantial improvement in efficacy. We have manufactured CD30.CARTs for 15 patients using retroviral transduction. Culture duration was 15±3 days, with a final transduction efficiency of 97.6%±1.8%. The cell products comprised >98% T cells, with a majority of them being effector T cells (CD45RO+ 95.5%±6.0%). 51Cr-release cytotoxicity assays confirmed that patients' CD30.CARTs lysed a CD30+ tumor line, HDLM-2 (45.9%±15.4% killing at a 20:1 effector:target ratio), with negligible effects on CD30− target cells (<5% killing). During cell manufacture, 1 patient became ineligible due to rapid worsening of his performance status and liver function. Five patients are awaiting treatment on trial. Nine relapsed/refractory HL patients have received CD30.CARTs under the RELY-30 trial. Six of these had relapsed or progressed after treatment with brentuximab. Three patients have been treated on dose level (DL) 1 (2×107 CD30.CAR+ T cells/m2) and 6 patients on DL2 (1×108). All patients received lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 and fludarabine 30 mg/m2 daily for 3 days) before CART infusion. CART infusions were associated with grade 1 cytokine release syndrome in 4 of the patients, and a transient maculopapular rash in 6 of the patients, starting approximately one week after administration. The molecular signal from CARTs, assessed by Q-PCR in peripheral blood, peaked at 1-2 weeks following infusion, but dropped progressively after 4 weeks and decreased to near the limit of detection level by 6 months post infusion. The signal level was dose dependent, with a peak average of 19,371 copies/mg DNA in patients treated on DL2 versus 7,132 copies/mg for DL1. Compared to patients who received the same CART dose but who were not given lymphodepleting chemotherapy in our previous trial, expansion levels were 45 and 119-fold higher, respectively. Eight patients have been evaluated at 6 weeks after infusion. Six have had a CR lasting from >6 weeks to >6 months, while 2 patients had disease progression. In conclusion, our data indicate that infusion of T cells carrying a CD30.CAR containing a CD28 endodomain after lymphodepleting chemotherapy is safe, with limited toxicities at the dose levels tested. CD30.CAR expansion is improved with inclusion of pre-infusion standard lymphodepleting chemotherapy and appears to be associated with improved efficacy in relapsed patients (6/8 CR versus 1/6 CR, P = 0.03). Disclosures Rooney: Marker: Equity Ownership. Heslop:Marker: Equity Ownership; Cytosen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tessa Therapeutics: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Research Funding; Gilead Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Viracyte: Equity Ownership. Brenner:Marker: Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals MSKCC Early Experience Using Radiotherapy As a Bridging Strategy for Relapsed Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma before CD19 CAR T Therapy

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3238-3238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon Imber ◽  
M. Lia Palomba ◽  
Carl DeSelm ◽  
Connie Lee Batlevi ◽  
Parastoo B. Dahi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family Member ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Bridging Strategy

Background: CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T) therapies have remarkable overall response rates (ORR) for relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). There is strong rationale to use a radiotherapy (RT) bridge during the cell manufacturing process including palliation, local control and cytoreduction with limited count impact. Recent data from our institution suggests RT may augment an immune response and sensitize antigen negative cells to CAR-mediated death. This series details our early experience using RT conditioning. Methods: 13 patients (median age 64 years) with DLBCL (n=9) or transformed follicular lymphoma (n=4) were analyzed. Overall, patients had a median of 2 prior therapies (range 1-8) including 3 with autologous transplant, 3 with distant RT and 1 with CAR T infusion. Several CAR products were used, including axicabtagene ciloleucel (n=8), JCAR017 (n=3, per NCT02631044), tisagenlecleucel (n=1) and EGFRt/19-28z/4-1BBL "armored" CAR (n=1, per NCT03085173). Most patients (n=10) began RT post apheresis with median duration between RT and CAR infusion of 20d (range 13-80, Figure 2). The most common RT regimen (n=8) was 20 Gy in 5 fractions (range 20-47 Gy) but 2 received our pre-transplant regimen of 30 Gy in 20 BID fractions. None received concurrent chemotherapy with RT but one had a cycle post RT and pre CAR. All had cyclophosphamide and fludarabine lymphodepletion. PET response was evaluated by Lugano criteria. Results: Three patients had limited stage PET avid disease at RT and were treated comprehensively pre-CAR. The remaining 10 were advanced stage and were treated palliatively to limited sites. Irradiated sites included the pelvis/groin (n=4), neck (n=3), intraabdominal (n=2) and extremity (n=2). Most (n=10) had intensity modulated radiotherapy. RT fields were large (median planning treatment volume of 887 cc, range 163-1641). Post RT PET interpretation was challenging given a short interval since RT ended (median 11d) but of 11 evaluable patients, many (n=8, 73%) had partial response (PR). Though locally controlled, most (n=10, 91%) had out of field progressive disease (PD) pre-CAR. Post CAR T, no severe adverse events in the RT field were noted, 9/13 had cytokine release syndrome (n=1 grade 3, n=2 grade 2) and 4 had neurotoxicity (n=3 grade 3). At day 30, ORR was 90%; of 10 evaluable patients, 7 had complete response (CR) and 2 had partial response (PR). Of the 7 evaluable patients at day 90, 4 (57%) had continued CR and the other 3 (43%) had PD and subsequently died from DLBCL. One relapsed at 95d post armored CAR both in and out of the RT field, and the other relapsed at 64d post JCAR017 primarily out of field. Conclusions: Use of RT as a CAR T bridging strategy is feasible and associated with excellent pre-CAR local control and initial post CAR ORR in a cohort of heavily pre-treated DLBCL patients. We observed moderate serious CAR toxicity that did not appear to be augmented by RT. Future efforts should clarify the optimal RT timing/dose and assess the potential for incremental immunogenicity with combined therapy. Disclosures Palomba: Hemedicus: Other: Immediate Family Member, Speakers Bureau ; Merck & Co Inc.: Other: Immediate Family Member, Consultancy (includes expert testimony); Seres Therapeutics: Other: Immediate Family Member, Equity Ownership and Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; STRAXIMM: Other: Immediate Family Member, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Other: Immediate Family Member, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Noble Insights: Consultancy; Evelo: Other: Immediate family member, Equity Ownership; MSK (IP for Juno and Seres): Other: Immediate Family Member, Patents & Royalties - describe: intellectual property rights . Batlevi:Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Giralt:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Noy:Medscape: Honoraria; Prime Oncology: Honoraria; Pharamcyclics: Research Funding; Raphael Pharma: Research Funding; NIH: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy. Park:Amgen: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Allogene: Consultancy. Sauter:Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genmab: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding. Scordo:Angiocrine Bioscience, Inc.: Consultancy; McKinsey & Company: Consultancy. Shah:Janssen: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Sadelain:Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Employment; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties. Perales:Bellicum: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Nektar Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; MolMed: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NexImmune: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyte/Gilead: Research Funding; Miltenyi: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Infectious Complications of BCMA-Targeted and CD19-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Immunotherapy

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Swetha Kambhampati ◽  
Bita Fakhri ◽  
Ying Sheng ◽  
Chiung-Yu Huang ◽  
Sophia Byslma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Chimeric Antigen Receptor ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Antigen Receptor ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
High Severity ◽  
Car T

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) immunotherapy is an evolving treatment for relapsed/ refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM). There is a growing need to elucidate the infectious complications of BCMA- and CD19-directed CAR T therapy. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of infection outcomes up to 1-year post BCMA and CD19-directed CAR T treatment. Methods: All patients treated at our institution with a BCMA-directed CAR T therapy for MM or with a CD19-directed CAR T for NHL from 2018-2020 were analyzed for risk factors for infection and infectious complications. Bacterial, viral and fungal infections were recorded if there was a microbiologic or histopathologic diagnosis or if clinical suspicion for infection required empiric treatment. Infection severity was classified as mild, moderate, severe, life-threatening, or fatal as previously described (Young et al. 2016, van Burnik et al. 2007). Infections were identified from the day of the first CAR T-cell infusion up to 1 year after infusion. Observation of infections was terminated at the time of disease progression, initiation of next therapy, or death, whichever occurred first. Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to compare between cohorts. Poisson mixed effects model with a subject-specific random intercept and an offset to account for the duration at risk was used to identify risk factors for infections. Results: Of the 104 subjects in this study, 55 patients (53%) had MM treated with BCMA CAR T and 49 patients (47%) had NHL treated with CD19 CAR T. Median number of prior therapies was 6 (4 - 9) in the BCMA cohort and 3 (2-4) in the CD19 cohort (Table 1). Prior to starting lymphodepleting (LD) chemotherapy, most patients did not have IgG&lt; 400, ALC&lt; 200, or ANC&lt; 500. Almost all the patients were on antibacterial (99%), antiviral (99%) and antifungal (92%) prophylaxis (ppx), with 18%, 90% and 9% of patients starting this before LD chemotherapy, respectively. Median follow-up time was 5.8 months (95% CI: 4.2-6.4). In total, there were 87 infection events (48 bacterial, 33 viral, and 6 fungal) observed in 56 patients (54%), with 47 infections in 29 (53%) patients in the BCMA CAR T cohort and 40 infections in 27 (55%) patients in the CD19 CAR T cohort (p =0.9). The BCMA cohort had 19 bacterial (40%) vs 29 bacterial (73%) in CD19 cohort (p=0.005), while BCMA cohort had 25 viral (53%) vs 8 viral (20%) in CD19 cohort (p=0.002). Fungal infection rates were comparable between BCMA and CD19 cohorts, 3 (6%) vs 3 (8%) respectively (p=1). Among the infections that occurred, 20 (23%) were high severity occurring in 16 patients (15%) of the overall cohort. Four high severity infections (5%) occurred in 3 patients (5%) in the BCMA cohort while 16 high severity infections (18%) occurred in 13 patients (27%) in the CD19 cohort (p &lt; 0.001) (Figure 1). The BCMA cohort had higher rates of respiratory infections (68% vs 50%, p=0.1), while the CD19 cohort had higher rates of bloodstream infections (15% vs 2%, p=0.05) and gastrointestinal infections (10% vs 0%, p=0.04). The rates of grade (Gr) 3-4 neutropenia and IgG &lt; 300 in both the cohorts at various time points post CAR T were comparable. At 9-12 months, Gr 3-4 neutropenia was 7% vs 8% (p=1) and IgG &lt; 300 was 7% vs 33% (p=0.1) for the BCMA and CD19 cohorts respectively. Adjusting for time periods, risk factors for development of infections were use of steroids (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.5, p=0.03) and post CAR T hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG &lt; 600) (IRR =2.1, 95% CI: 1.2-3.9, p=0.02). Conclusions: This retrospective study is one of the largest studies to date comparing the post CAR T infections rates between BCMA and CD19 directed CAR T treated patients. While the incidence of infection, use of antimicrobial ppx, and rates of Gr 3-4 neutropenia and hypogammaglobulinemia were comparable between BCMA and CD19 CAR T cohorts, viral infections were more common post BCMA CAR T while bacterial infections were more frequent post CD19 CAR T. Use of steroids as well as post CAR T hypogammaglobulinemia are possible risk factors for development of infections. Further studies are needed to examine the infectious complications post-CAR T treatment, characterize the underlying risk factors, and to establish appropriate prophylactic approaches in patients undergoing CD19- and BCMA-directed CAR T therapy. Disclosures Fakhri: University of California San Francisco: Current Employment. Ai:Nurix Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics, Kymera: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martin:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Sanofi: Research Funding; AMGEN: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Wolf:Adaptive: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Shah:BMS, Janssen, Bluebird Bio, Sutro Biopharma, Teneobio, Poseida, Nektar: Research Funding; GSK, Amgen, Indapta Therapeutics, Sanofi, BMS, CareDx, Kite, Karyopharm: Consultancy. Andreadis:Genentech: Other: Spouse Employee (salary and stock); Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene/Juno: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Other: Advisor; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisor; Astellas: Other: Advisor; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisor; Karyopharm: Other: Advisor; Incyte: Other. Wong:GSK: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Fortis: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Selinexor-Containing Regimens for the Treatment of Patients with Multiple Myeloma Refractory to Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) Therapy

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1854-1854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajai Chari ◽  
Dan T. Vogl ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Jagoda K. Jasielec ◽  
Andrew DeCastro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Chimeric Antigen Receptor ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Introduction: There are limited data on treatment options for patients with multiple myeloma whose disease has progressed after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. Selinexor is a novel, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) that forces nuclear retention and activation of tumor suppressor proteins. Selinexor plus low dose dexamethasone (Sel-dex) was recently approved in the United States based on data from the STORM study wherein, Sel-dex induced an overall response rate (ORR) of 26.2% in patients with penta-exposed, triple-class refractory multiple myeloma. The activity of Sel-dex was preserved regardless of specific prior therapies, as expected given its unique and novel mechanism of action. The efficacy of selinexor after CAR-T therapy remains unknown. Here, we report on observations of the efficacy of Sel-dex alone or administered as a triplet in combination with bortezomib or carfilzomib in patients with multiple myeloma whose disease has progressed after CAR-T therapy. Methods: We identified 7 patients across all selinexor myeloma trials who had received lymphodepleting conditioning (fludarabine/cyclophosphamide n=6; Cyclophosphamide n=1) followed by an effective dose of CAR-T cell therapy (>108 CAR-positive cells targeting B-cell maturation antigen) for their multiple myeloma prior to being enrolled in a trial using a selinexor-containing regimen. Four were female and 3 were male. Median age was 64 years (range: 35-70 years). One patient was treated in the STORM study, with selinexor (starting at 80 mg twice-weekly) and dexamethasone (20 mg twice-weekly), 1 patient was treated with selinexor (100 mg once-weekly) plus bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 once-weekly for 4 of 5 weeks) and dexamethasone (40 mg once-weekly) and 5 patients were treated with selinexor (100 mg once-weekly) plus carfilzomib (20/56 mg/m2 or 20/70 mg/m2) and dexamethasone (40 mg once-weekly or 20 mg twice-weekly). Response was assessed by the treating physician per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Results: Patients had a median of 10 prior therapeutic regimens (range:5-15), all had high-risk cytogenetics, and 6 of the 7 had rapidly progressing disease as indicated by the percent increase in paraprotein (17-91%) between screening and Cycle 1 Day 1 (range: 7-22 days). All patients responded to treatment, including 1 unconfirmed complete response (uCR), 2 very good partial responses (VGPR), 3 partial responses (PR), and 1 minimal response (MR). Responses were rapid and typically occurred within the first cycle of treatment (median 28 days; range 14-83 days). At the time of data cutoff, the median time on a selinexor-based regimen was 4.1 monthsange: 2.5-8.0 months); 2 patients' disease had progressed, 1 patient had withdrawn consent, and 4 patients were still responding on therapy. Adverse events were consistent with what has previously been reported with selinexor-containing regimens in heavily-pretreated patients with multiple myeloma and included nausea, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and anemia. Conclusions: These results suggest that Sel-dex alone or in combination with bortezomib or carfilzomib may offer therapeutic benefit for patients who have exhausted available treatment options, have rapidly progressing disease, and who have progressed after CAR-T therapy. Importantly patients are able to tolerate and remain on therapy with weekly Sel-dex in combination with bortezomib or carfilzomib, with time on therapy of >4 months and 4/7 patients remaining on therapy. Although based on a small sample size, the findings of this analysis are intriguing and warrant further investigation in a larger study. Disclosures Chari: Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Vogl:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Active Biotech: Consultancy. Jagannath:Merck: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Medicom: Speakers Bureau; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy. DeCastro:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Unger:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shah:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jakubowiak:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SkyLineDx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; KaryoPharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Safety of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Elderly Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 96-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dahlia Sano ◽  
Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽  
Nathan H. Fowler ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
F. B. Hagemeister ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Car T ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Background Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous CD19-specific CAR T-cell therapy product that was FDA approved for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after at least two lines of systemic therapy. In the pivotal ZUMA-1 study, the best overall response (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates observed in 108 patients treated with axi-cel were 82% and 58%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 15.4 months, 42% of the patients remain in ongoing response (Neelapu et al. N Eng J Med 2017). Analysis of efficacy outcomes in patients <65 years (N=81) and ³65 years (N=27) showed that the ORR and ongoing response at 12 months were comparable between the two subgroups (Neelapu et al. N Eng J Med 2017). Whether the safety is also comparable between the two subgroups is unknown. Here, we report safety outcomes in elderly patients (³65 years) with large B-cell lymphoma treated with axi-cel at our institution. Methods We retrospectively analyzed and reviewed the data from patients treated with axi-cel at our institution. Patients had a diagnosis of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL), and transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL). Patients were treated with conditioning chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine for 3 days followed by axi-cel infusion after 2 days of rest at a dose of 2 x 106 CAR+ T cells/kg body weight. Patients were monitored for toxicities for at least 7 days in the hospital after CAR T infusion and those who had at least 30 days of follow-up after axi-cel were considered to be evaluable for safety. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological toxicity termed as CAR-related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES) were graded according to the CARTOX grading system (Neelapu et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018). Results A total of 61 patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received axi-cel at our institution were included. Of these, 44 (72%) patients were <65 years of age and 17 (28%) patients were ³65 years of age. The baseline characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. ORR and CR rates at Day 30 were comparable between the two groups. CRS was common in both groups and was observed in 83% and 91% of the patients in the older and younger age groups, respectively. But most CRS events were grade 1-2. Grade 3 or higher CRS was observed in 18% vs. 11% in the older vs. younger age groups (P=0.67). One patient with a history of autoimmune disease in the elderly group died of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). CRES was observed in 58% and 71% of the patients in the older and younger age groups, respectively. Grade 3 or higher CRES was observed in 29% vs. 39% in the older vs. younger age groups (P=0.58). Median hospitalization period for axi-cel CAR T-cell therapy was comparable between the two groups. Conclusions Our results suggest that response rates are comparable between the elderly and younger age groups at day 30 after axi-cel therapy. Importantly, toxicities due to CRS and/or CRES after axi-cel CD19 CAR T cell therapy are comparable between the elderly (³65 years) and younger (<65 years) patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Table 1 Table 1. Disclosures Nastoupil: Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Juno: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therappeutics: Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Fowler:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Samaniego:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Wang:Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MoreHealth: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Westin:Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apotex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Development and Evaluation of a Human Single Chain Variable Fragment (scFv) Derived Bcma Targeted CAR T Cell Vector Leads to a High Objective Response Rate in Patients with Advanced MM

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 742-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric L Smith ◽  
Sham Mailankody ◽  
Arnab Ghosh ◽  
Reed Masakayan ◽  
Mette Staehr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) rarely obtain durable remissions with available therapies. Clinical use of BCMA targeted CAR T cell therapy was first reported in 12/2015 for RRMM, and based on small numbers, preliminary results appear promising. Given that host immune anti-murine CAR responses have limited the efficacy of repeat dosing (Turtle C. Sci Trans Med 2016), our goal was to develop a human BCMA targeted CAR T cell vector for clinical translation. We screened a human B cell derived scFv phage display library containing 6x1010 scFvs with BCMA expressing NIH 3T3 cells, and validated results on human MM cell lines. 57 unique and diverse BCMA specific scFvs were identified containing light and heavy chain CDR's each covering 6 subfamilies, with HCDR3 length ranges from 5-18 amino acids. 17 scFvs met stringent specificity criteria, and a diverse set was cloned into CAR vectors with either a CD28 or a 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain. Donor T cells transduced with BCMA targeted CAR vectors that conveyed particularly desirable properties over multiple in vitro assays, including: cytotoxicity on human MM cell lines at low E:T ratios (&gt;90% lysis, 1:1, 16h), robust proliferation after repeat antigen stimulation (up to 700 fold, stimulation q3-4d for 14d), and active cytokine profiling, were selected for in vivo studies using a marrow predominant human MM cell line model in NSG mice. A single IV injection of CAR T cells, either early (4d) or late (21d) after MM engraftment was evaluated. In both cases survival was increased when treated with BCMA targeted CAR T cells vs CD19 targeted CAR T cells (median OS at 60d NR vs 35d p&lt;0.05). Tumor and CAR T cells were imaged in vivo by taking advantage of luciferase constructs with different substrates. Results show rapid tumor clearance, peak (&gt;10,000 fold) CAR T expansion at day 6, followed by contraction of CAR T cells after MM clearance, confirming the efficacy of the anti-BCMA scFv/4-1BB containing construct. Co-culture with primary cells from a range of normal tissues did not activate CAR T cells as noted by a lack of IFN release. Co-culture of 293 cells expressing this scFv with those expressing a library of other TNFRSF or Ig receptor members demonstrated specific binding to BCMA. GLP toxicity studies in mice showed no unexpected adverse events. We generated a retroviral construct for clinical use including a truncated epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFRt) elimination gene: EGFRt/hBCMA-41BBz. Clinical investigation of this construct is underway in a dose escalation, single institution trial. Enrollment is completed on 2/4 planned dose levels (DL). On DL1 pts received cyclophosphamide conditioning (3g/m2 x1) and 72x106 mean CAR+ T cells. On DL2 pts received lower dose cyclophosphamide/fludarabine (300/30 mg/m2 x3) and 137x106 mean CAR+ T cells. All pts screened for BCMA expression by IHC were eligible. High risk cytogenetics were present in 4/6 pts. Median prior lines of therapy was 7; all pts had IMiD, PI, high dose melphalan, and CD38 directed therapies. With a data cut off of 7/20/17, 6 pts are evaluable for safety. There were no DLT's. At DL1, grade 1 CRS, not requiring intervention, occurred in 1/3 pts. At DL2, grade 1/2 CRS occurred in 2/3 pts; both received IL6R directed Tocilizumab (Toci) with near immediate resolution. In these 2 pts time to onset of fever was a mean 2d, Tmax was 39.4-41.1 C, peak CRP was 25-27mg/dl, peak IL6 level pre and post Toci were 558-632 and 3375-9071 pg/ml, respectively. Additional serum cytokines increased &gt;10 fold from baseline in both pts include: IFNg, GM CSF, Fractalkine, IL5, IL8, and IP10. Increases in ferritin were limited, and there were no cases of hypofibrinogenemia. There were no grade 3-5 CRS and no neurotoxicities or cerebral edema. No pts received steroids or Cetuximab. Median time to count recovery after neutropenia was 10d (range 6-15d). Objective responses by IMWG criteria after a single dose of CAR T cells were observed across both DLs. At DL1, of 3 pts, responses were 1 VGPR, 1 SD, and 1 pt treated with baseline Mspike 0.46, thus not evaluable by IMWG criteria, had &gt;50% reduction in Mspike, and normalization of K/L ratio. At DL2, 2/2 pts had objective responses with 1 PR and 1 VGPR (baseline 95% marrow involvement); 1 pt is too early to evaluate. As we are employing a human CAR, the study was designed to allow for an optional second dose in pts that do not reach CR. We have treated 2 pts with a second dose, and longer follow up data is pending. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Smith: Juno Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: BCMA targeted CAR T cells, Research Funding. Almo: Cue Biopharma: Other: Founder, head of SABequity holder; Institute for Protein Innovation: Consultancy; AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP: Consultancy. Wang: Eureka Therapeutics Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Xu: Eureka Therapeutics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Park: Amgen: Consultancy. Curran: Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Dogan: Celgene: Consultancy; Peer Review Institute: Consultancy; Roche Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Liu: Eureka Therpeutics Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Brentjens: Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Phase 2 Study of the Response and Safety of P-Bcma-101 CAR-T Cells in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (r/r) Multiple Myeloma (MM) (PRIME)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3184-3184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin L. Costello ◽  
Tara K. Gregory ◽  
Syed Abbas Ali ◽  
Jesus G. Berdeja ◽  
Krina K. Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

P-BCMA-101 is a novel chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell product targeting B Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA). P-BCMA-101 is produced using the piggyBac® (PB) DNA Modification System instead of the viral vector that is used with most CAR-T cells, requiring only plasmid DNA and mRNA. This makes it less costly and produces cells with a high percentage of the favorable T stem cell memory phenotype (TSCM). The higher cargo capacity of PB permits the incorporation of multiple genes in addition to CAR(s), including a safety switch allowing for rapid CAR-T cell elimination with a small molecule drug infusion in patients if desired, and a selection gene allowing for enrichment of CAR+ cells. Rather than using a traditional antibody-based binder, P-BCMA-101 has a Centyrin™ fused to a CD3ζ/4-1BB signaling domain. Centyrins are fully human proteins with high specificity and a large range of binding affinities, but are smaller, more stable and potentially less immunogenic than traditional scFv. Cumulatively, these features are predicted to result in a greater therapeutic index. A Phase 1, 3+3 dose escalation from 0.75 to 15 x 106 P-BCMA-101 CAR-T cells/kg (RP2D 6-15 x 106 cells/kg) was conducted in patients with r/r MM (Blood 2018 132:1012) demonstrating excellent efficacy and safety of P-BCMA-101, including notably low rates and grades of CRS and neurotoxicity (maximum Grade 2 without necessitating ICU admission, safety switch activation or other aggressive measures). These results supported FDA RMAT designation and initiation of a pivotal Phase 2 study. A Phase 2 pivotal portion of this study has recently been designed and initiated (PRIME; NCT03288493) in r/r MM patients who have received at least 3 prior lines of therapy. Their therapy must have contained a proteasome inhibitor, an IMiD, and CD38 targeted therapy with at least 2 of the prior lines in the form of triplet combinations. They must also have undergone ≥2 cycles of each line unless PD was the best response, refractory to the most recent line of therapy, and undergone autologous stem cell transplant or not be a candidate. Patients are required to be >=18 years old, have measurable disease by International Myeloma Working Group criteria (IMWG; Kumar 2016), adequate vital organ function and lack significant autoimmune, CNS and infectious diseases. No pre-specified level of BCMA expression is required, as this has not been demonstrated to correlate with clinical outcomes for P-BCMA-101 and other BCMA-targeted CAR-T products. Interestingly, unlike most CAR-T products patients may receive P-BCMA-101 after prior CAR-T cells or BCMA targeted agents, and may be multiply infused with P-BCMA-101. Patients are apheresed to harvest T cells, P-BCMA-101 is then manufactured and administered to patients as a single intravenous (IV) dose (6-15 x 106 P-BCMA-101 CAR-T cells/kg) after a standard 3-day cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2/day) / fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day) conditioning regimen. One hundred patients are planned to be treated with P-BCMA-101. Uniquely, given the safety profile demonstrated during Phase 1, no hospital admission is required and patients may be administered P-BCMA-101 in an outpatient setting. The primary endpoints are safety and response rate by IMWG criteria. With a 100-subject sample, the Phase 2 part of the trial will have 90% power to detect a 15-percentage point improvement over a 30% response rate (based on that of the recently approved anti-CD38 antibody daratumumab), using an exact test for a binomial proportion with a 1-sided 0.05 significance level. Multiple biomarkers are being assessed including BCMA and cytokine levels, CAR-T cell kinetics, immunogenicity, T cell receptor diversity, CAR-T cell and patient gene expression (e.g. Nanostring) and others. Overall, the PRIME study is the first pivotal study of the unique P-BCMA-101 CAR-T product, and utilizes a number of novel design features. Studies are being initiated in combination with approved therapeutics and earlier lines of therapy with the intent of conducting Phase 3 trials. Funding by Poseida Therapeutics and the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM). Disclosures Costello: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Gregory:Poseida: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Ali:Celgene: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding. Berdeja:Amgen Inc, BioClinica, Celgene Corporation, CRISPR Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Janssen Biotech Inc, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma Inc, Prothena, Servier, Takeda Oncology: Consultancy; AbbVie Inc, Amgen Inc, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bluebird Bio, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene Corporation, Constellation Pharma, Curis Inc, Genentech, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Biotech Inc, Kesios Therapeutics, Lilly, Novartis, Poseida: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding. Patel:Oncopeptides, Nektar, Precision Biosciences, BMS: Consultancy; Takeda, Celgene, Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Poseida Therapeutics, Cellectis, Abbvie: Research Funding. Shah:University of California, San Francisco: Employment; Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Oncopeptides, Karoypharm, Surface Oncology, Precision biosciences GSK, Nektar, Amgen, Indapta Therapeutics, Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Indapta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Celgene, Janssen, Bluebird Bio, Sutro Biopharma: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nkarta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teneobio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ostertag:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Martin:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ghoddusi:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shedlock:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Spear:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Orlowski:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Cohen:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Tenalisib Given in Combination with Romidepsin in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results from a Phase I/II Open Label Multi-Center Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1365-1365
Author(s):  
Swaminathan P Iyer ◽  
Auris Huen ◽  
Weiyun Z. Ai ◽  
Deepa Jagadeesh ◽  
Mary Jo Lechowicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family Member ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Data Monitoring Committee ◽  
Data Monitoring ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Monitoring Committee ◽  
Committee Membership

Abstract Background: Tenalisib (RP6530), a highly selective PI3K δ/γ and SIK3 inhibitor has shown promising activity as a single agent in T Cell lymphoma (TCL) and a differentiated safety profile (Huen A et al., Cancers,2020). In vitro studies in TCL cell lines showed synergistic activity when tenalisib was combined with romidepsin. A Phase I/II study of tenalisib in combination with romidepsin was designed to assess safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) TCL peripheral (PTCL) and cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) (NCT03770000). Methods: This was a multi-center, open label study. We performed a Phase I, 3+3 dose escalation study to determine the MTD/recommended Phase II dose (RP2D), and a dose expansion study in both the subtypes separately (PTCL and CTCL). Patients received tenalisib at doses ranging from 400-800 mg BID (fasting), orally in combination with romidepsin at doses ranging from 12-14 mg/m 2, intravenously, given on Days 1,8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Results: Thirty-three patients (16 PTCL and 17 CTCL) who received more than 1 prior therapy were enrolled in the study; 9 in dose escalation and 24 in dose expansion. Of the 33 patients, 64% were refractory to their last therapy. The median number of prior therapies was 3. Most patients (67%) had stage III/IV disease at time of enrolment. No dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was reported during dose escalation; tenalisib 800 mg BID with romidepsin 14 mg/m 2 (given on Days 1, 8, and 15) was chosen as the RP2D. The most frequent treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were nausea (All: 73% and ≥G3:0%), thrombocytopenia (All:57% and ≥G3:21%), fatigue (All: 54% and ≥G3:6%), AST elevation (All:33% and ≥G3:6%) ALT elevation (All:27% and ≥G3:18%), neutropenia (All: 27% and ≥G3:15%), vomiting (All:27% and ≥G3:0%), decreased appetite (All: 27% and ≥G3:0%). There were no unexpected TEAEs. Among CTCL patients, five related TEAEs led to drug discontinuation were sepsis, ALT elevation, GGT elevation, rash, and dysgeusia. None of the PTCL patients discontinued the study drug due to related TEAEs. Incidences of TEAEs leading to drug interruption (72%) and dose reduction (45%) of any the drugs in the combination were similar in PTCL and CTCL groups. Based on C max and AUC, dose proportional exposure of tenalisib was observed from doses 400-800 mg BID. Co-administration of romidepsin with tenalisib did not significantly alter the PK of either agent. Of the 33 patients enrolled, 27 (12 PTCL and 15 CTCL) who received at least 1 dose of study drug and provided at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment were considered evaluable for efficacy as per protocol. The overall response rate (ORR) was of 63%; 7 (26%) patients achieved CR and 10 (37%) patients had PR (Table 1). The median duration of response (DoR) was 5.03 months (range: 2.16 months-Not Reached). In twelve evaluable PTCL patients, the ORR was 75% with 6 CR (50%) and 3 PR (25%). Among 15 evaluable CTCL patients, 8 responded with an ORR of 53.3%, 1 CR (6.7%) and 7 PR (46.7%). The median DoR was 5.03 (range: 2.16 months-Not Reached) for PTCL and 3.8 months (1.9-18.86) for CTCL. Three of the six (50%) PTCL patients with CR were bridged to transplant. Six patients who benefitted with the treatment and completed the protocol were enrolled in an open-label compassionate medication study after Cycle 7 and are being followed up. Conclusions: The combination of tenalisib and romidepsin demonstrates a favorable safety profile and promising anti-tumor activity in patients with R/R TCL. Based on these encouraging results, further development of this combination in PTCL patients in being planned. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Huen: Rhizen: Research Funding; Elorac: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Research Funding; Tillium: Research Funding; Innate: Research Funding; Galderma: Research Funding; Miragen: Research Funding. Ai: Kymria, Kite, ADC Therapeutics, BeiGene: Consultancy. Feldman: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Honoraria, Other: Study investigator. Alderuccio: ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncinfo / OncLive: Honoraria; Puma Biotechnology: Other: Family member; Inovio Pharmaceuticals: Other: Family member; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Other: Family member; Forma Therapeutics: Other: Family member. Kuzel: Cardinal Health: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Exelixis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genomic Health: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Genzyme Genomic Health Tempus laboratories Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria; Abbvie: Other; Curio Science: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AmerisourceBergen Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CVS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tempus Laboratories: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Other: Data Monitoring Committee Membership; Amgen: Other: Data Monitoring Committee Membership; SeaGen: Other: Data Monitoring Committee Membership; Medpace: Other: Data Monitoring Committee Membership.

Brentuximab Vedotin (SGN-35) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Systemic Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: A Phase 2 Study Update

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 443-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranjana H. Advani ◽  
Andrei R. Shustov ◽  
Pauline Brice ◽  
Nancy L. Bartlett ◽  
Joseph D. Rosenblatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 443 Background: Systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL) is a T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) characterized by the uniform expression of CD30. sALCL accounts for 2–5% of all cases of NHL; approximately 40–65% of patients experience recurrent disease after frontline treatment with few effective treatment options. Brentuximab vedotin (SGN-35) comprises an anti-CD30 antibody conjugated by a protease-cleavable linker to the potent antimicrotubule agent, monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). A phase 2 study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin in patients with relapsed or refractory sALCL (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT00866047); updated results of this trial are presented. Methods: Brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg was administered every 3 weeks as a 30-minute outpatient IV infusion for up to 16 cycles of treatment. Determination of efficacy was based on objective response assessments per independent review according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Patients were enrolled between June 2009 and May 2010 at 22 clinical sites in the US, Canada, and Europe. Results: 58 patients with a median of 2 prior therapies (range 1–6) were treated; 57% were male and the median age was 52 years (range 14–76). Seventy-two percent of patients had ALK-negative disease, 62% had primary refractory disease (defined as no complete remission (CR) or relapse within 3 months of frontline therapy), and 26% had failed a prior autologous stem cell transplant (SCT). As previously reported, the objective response rate (ORR) was 86%, the CR rate was 57%, and 97% of patients had a reduction in tumor volume postbaseline. At the time of this updated analysis (data cut May 2011), all but 2 patients had discontinued treatment with brentuximab vedotin; the median number of treatment cycles was 7 (range 1–16). The median duration of objective response was 13.0 months (range 0.1–19.1+) and the median duration of response for patients achieving a CR was 17.1 months (range 0.7–19.1+). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.6 months and median overall survival was not yet reached. Per investigator assessment, the median PFS with brentuximab vedotin was significantly longer than the median PFS achieved with the most recent prior therapy (20.0 months vs. 5.9 months; P value <0.001). All subgroups of patients analyzed in the study achieved a similar level of antitumor activity, regardless of baseline disease characteristics, tumor burden, or prior treatment history. Responses were particularly noteworthy in patients who had never responded to any previous therapy (n=13); in this subgroup of patients, 10 achieved an objective response (77%) and 4 a CR (31%). After discontinuing treatment in the study, 16 patients (28%) received a hematopoietic SCT (8 allogeneic, 8 autologous). The most common adverse events observed in the study were peripheral sensory neuropathy (41%), nausea (40%), fatigue (38%), pyrexia (34%), diarrhea (29%), rash (24%), constipation (22%), and neutropenia (21%). Most AEs in the study were Grade 1 or 2 in severity. Ten patients (17%) experienced Grade 3 events of peripheral neuropathy as defined in a Standardised MedDRA Query; no Grade 4 events were observed. In patients with neuropathy, 79% (26 of 33) have experienced resolution or some improvement and the median time to resolution or improvement was 13.3 weeks (range 0.3–48.7). Conclusions: Durable complete remissions were achieved with brentuximab vedotin, and treatment was associated with manageable toxicity, in patients with relapsed or refractory sALCL. Approximately half of the responding patients (24 of 50) continued in remission at the time of this analysis; updated results of efficacy and long term safety will be presented at the meeting. Based on the results from this study, a trial evaluating the safety of brentuximab vedotin administered in sequence and in combination with multiagent chemotherapy was initiated and is currently ongoing in frontline sALCL. Disclosures: Advani: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Brentuximab vedotin (SGN-35) comprises an anti-CD30 antibody conjugated by a protease-cleavable linker to the potent antimicrotubule agent, monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). It is an investigational agent that is being studied in CD30+ malignancies. Shustov:Millennium: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Brice:Roche: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bartlett:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Travel Expenses. Rosenblatt:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Illidge:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Matous:Cephalon: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Ramchandren:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Fanale:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Connors:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Yang:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kennedy:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pro:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Phase 1b/2a Open-Label, Multiple-Dose, Dose-Escalation Study To Evaluate The Safety and Tolerability Of Intravenous Infusion Of SNS01-T In Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Multiple Myeloma, Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Or Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1950-1950 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A Lust ◽  
Charles Barranco ◽  
Saad Z Usmani ◽  
Frits van Rhee ◽  
Mehdi Hamadani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Pro Inflammatory Cytokines

Abstract Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A (eIF5A) has been implicated in the regulation of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and inflammation, and is the only known protein to be modified by hypusination. Hypusinated eIF5A, the predominant form of eIF5A in cancer cells, is involved in cell survival and activation of inflammatory pathways. In contrast, accumulation of the unhypusinated form of eIF5A is associated with apoptosis and mutants of eIF5A that cannot be hypusinated (e.g. eIF5AK50R) are pro-apoptotic. SNS01-T was designed to treat B-cell cancers and consists of two active components: a plasmid DNA expressing the pro-apoptotic eIF5AK50R under the control of a B cell-specific promoter, and an siRNA against an untranslated region of native eIF5A mRNA. When these two components are combined with linear polyethyleneimine (PEI), the nucleic acids are condensed into nanoparticles for protection from degradation in the blood and enhanced cellular delivery. The mode of action of SNS01-T is siRNA-mediated inhibition of hypusinated eIF5A and simultaneous over-expression of pro-apoptotic eIF5AK50R to induce cell death. In vitro cell studies and in vivo xenograft studies have demonstrated the efficacy of this approach. The safety and tolerability of intravenous administration of SNS01-T is being investigated in a first-in-human Phase1b/2a study in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) or diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Eligible patients are being enrolled sequentially into four cohorts at increasing doses. Each patient receives an intravenous infusion of SNS01-T twice weekly for 6 consecutive weeks. Eligible patients must have been diagnosed with MM according to IMWG criteria, or with MCL or DLBCL with histologic confirmation. Patients also must have measurable disease, have relapsed or refractory disease after two or more prior treatment regimens, have a life expectancy of at least 3 months, and not be eligible to receive any other standard therapy known to extend life expectancy. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple escalating doses of SNS01-T. Secondary objectives include analysis of pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and therapeutic efficacy. The required 3 patients per cohort have completed the dosing schedule in cohorts 1 and 2 from a total of 10 patients enrolled (9 patients with MM and 1 with DLBCL). Of the ten patients enrolled, four completed the full treatment period, two did not complete dosing but were evaluable for safety, and four (three in cohort 1 and one in cohort 2) discontinued treatment after fewer than 8 doses and were not evaluable. There were no drug-related serious adverse events or dose limiting toxicities in either cohort 1 or 2. In cohort 1 (0.0125 mg/kg SNS01-T), two of three evaluable patients did not progress on treatment and were considered stable at week 3 and week 6, the end of the dosing regimen. The third patient progressed after receiving 10 of the 12 doses and was evaluable for safety. In cohort 2 (0.05 mg/kg), 3 patients (2 with MM and 1 with DLBCL) were evaluable for safety. Stabilization of serum monoclonal protein levels was observed in one MM patient of cohort 2. Two patients (1 with MM and 1 with DLBCL) progressed after receiving 8 of the 12 doses and were evaluable for safety. Results from ongoing pharmacokinetic studies, immunogenicity studies, and quantification of pro-inflammatory cytokines will be discussed. The planned dose levels for the third and fourth groups are 0.2 and 0.375 mg/kg, respectively. The results to date of this first-in-human clinical trial indicate that SNS01-T can be administered safely and the MTD has not yet been reached (Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01435720). Disclosures: Barranco: Senesco Technologies: Consultancy. Usmani:Celgene, Onyx, Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. van Rhee:Jansen&Jansen: Research Funding. Thompson:Senesco Technologies: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Taylor:Senesco Technologies: stock options Other. Dondero:Senesco Technologies: Employment. Browne:Senesco Technologies Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Celgene, Millenium, Onyx (same for all): Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document