scholarly journals Engraftment Syndrome in the Setting of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma-a Single Institution Review of over 600 Patients

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4576-4576
Author(s):  
Sudarsan Kollimuttathuliam ◽  
Phyllis McKiernan ◽  
David S. Siegel ◽  
Scott D. Rowley ◽  
Noa Biran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Autologous Transplant ◽  
Engraftment Syndrome ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Reduced Risk

Engraftment syndrome (ES) is a well-defined entity characterized by non-infectious fever and other clinical manifestations including skin rash, pulmonary infiltrates, diarrhea, weight gain and neurological symptoms which happens in the setting of autologous HSCT during early neutrophil recovery phase. (Spitzer ,2001).These clinical manifestations usually occur immediately before or at the time of neutrophil engraftment possibly due to the release of inflammatory cytokines. ES may require therapy with corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive drugs. Our study cohort included 645 patients with multiple myeloma treated with autologous stem cell transplantation between January 2010 and June 2019. The majority of patients had a single autologous transplant (80%), 18 % received a second autologous transplant and 3 patients had a third autologous transplant. Fifty seven percent of patients were male, 61 % had IgG myeloma and 50 percent had standard risk cytogenetics. Sixty three percent of patients were under the age of 65 years. ES was defined as a combination of at least 2 symptoms not attributed to other causes, including non-infectious fever, diarrhea, skin rash, pulmonary infiltrates or hepatic dysfunction, occurring from 3 days prior to 10 days post engraftment. (Cornell ,2015).One hundred and ninety seven patients in this cohort met the criteria for engraftment syndrome of whom 173 were treated with corticosteroids and 9 required the addition of tacrolimus or cyclosporine. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed looking at risk factors for the development of ES and the overall effect of ES on patient outcome. Results of our univariate analysis showed that age >65, female sex, use of plerixafor were significant risk factors for developing engraftment syndrome while use of cyclophosphamide-based mobilization had significantly reduced risk. Multivariate analysis using Gray Fine model revealed that patients over 65 years were twice as likely to develop ES than patients who were younger than 65 years (HR=1.881, CI: 1.405 to 2.518). Females had a 36% higher risk of ES than male patients (HR=1.355, CI: 1.011 to 1.815). Patients who were infused with more than 7x106 CD34+ cells/kg had a 40% reduced risk of developing ES (HR=0.559, CI: 0.385 to 0.812). Receiving the new formulation of melphalan: EVOMELAⓇ, as preparative regimen, was associated with a 60% increased risk of developing ES compared to patients treated with the standard formulation (HR=1.597, CI: 1.116 to 2.285). The use of plerixafor was found to be a risk factor for ES even when adjusted for age(HR=1.463,CI:1.024 to 2.089). Follow- up of patients that did not develop ES (n=445) had a median of 59 months (IQR: 29.0 -80.0months), range: 0 - 136 months. Follow-up time of patients that developed ES (n=197) was 41.0 months (IQR: 16.0 - 66.0 months), range: 0.0 - 131 months.An overall survival analysis of patients who developed engraftment syndrome showed a trend for improved survival in patients who did not develop engraftment syndrome, however this did not meet statistical significance and PFS curves were similar with no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Our study of this large cohort of patients suggests that selection of mobilization regimen and conditioning chemotherapy could decrease the incidence of ES, thereby decreasing morbidity and prolonged hospital stay. There can also be a consideration for pre-emptive treatment of patients in the very high risk category based on age, gender and available cell dose. Disclosures Siegel: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rowley:Allergan: Equity Ownership; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy. Biran:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Research Funding. Goldberg:Cancer Outcomes Tracking and Analysis (COTA) Inc.: Equity Ownership; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; COTA: Equity Ownership. Goy:Takeda: Other: Grants outside of the submitted work; Hackensack University Medical Center, RCCA: Employment; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants outside of the submitted work, Research Funding; Hakensackumc: Research Funding; University of Nebraska: Research Funding; Astrazenca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Other: Grants outside of the submitted work, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants outside of the submitted work, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants outside of the submitted work; COTA: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: leadership role for profit healthcare company; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Outcomes for Patients (Pts) with Low-/Int-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) with del5q Aged < 65 Years Treated with Lenalidomide (LEN) in MDS-003 and MDS-004: A Retrospective Combined Analysis

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1723-1723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Fenaux ◽  
Aristoteles Giagounidis ◽  
Alan F. List ◽  
Stephen D. Nimer ◽  
Eva Hellström-Lindberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Potential Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Secondary Failure ◽  
Potential Risk Factors ◽  
Rbc Transfusion ◽  
Reduced Risk

Abstract Abstract 1723 Background: Two multicenter studies (MDS-003/-004) found LEN leads to RBC transfusion independence (TI) in > 50% of pts with RBC transfusion dependent Low-/Int-1-risk MDS with del5q (List A et al. NEJM 2006;355: 1456–65; Fenaux P et al. Blood 2011;doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-330126). RBC-TI ≥ 8 wks with LEN was associated with significantly reduced risk of AML progression and death (Fenaux P et al. Blood 2011;doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-330126). Alternative therapy is required for pts failing LEN therapy. Aims: To assess predictive factors of LEN response and long term outcomes (especially after primary or secondary LEN failure) of pts < 65 yrs included in MDS-003/-004; ie, those in whom intensive therapies including allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) may be considered. Methods: LEN was administered as follows (all 28-d cycles): 5 mg/d on d 1–28 and 10 mg/d on d 1–21 or 1–28. RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks and cytogenetic response (CyR; IWG 2000) are reported. Overall survival (OS) and AML progression were assessed using Kaplan-Meier method. Response rates and outcomes in pts < 65 yrs were retrospectively compared with pts ≥ 65 yrs. Primary failure was defined as lack of RBC-TI with LEN treatment and secondary failure as relapse after achievement of RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the effect of potential risk factors (ie, age, sex, time since diagnosis, FAB classification, LEN dose, IPSS risk, WPSS risk, cytogenetics, bone marrow blast %, transfusion burden, no. of cytopenias, hemoglobin level, platelet and neutrophil counts, RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks [time-dependent variable] and CyR [categorical variable]) on OS and AML progression. Logistic model was used to evaluate the effect of potential risk factors on achievement of RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks. Results: The trials included 97 (33.9%) pts < 65 yrs. Of these, 73.2% were female; 20.6% were IPSS Low-, 52.6% Int-1-, and 4.1% Int-2-risk; 30.9% had del5q with ≥ 1 additional cytogenetic abnormality (8.2% had complex cytogenetics). At baseline (BL), median time since diagnosis was 2.4 yrs (range 0.2–20.7) and median RBC transfusion requirement was 6 units/8 wks (range 1–15). In pts ≥ 65 yrs (n = 189) most BL characteristics were similar except IPSS risk, which was lower (36.5% Low-, 37.0% Int-1-, 5.8% Int-2-risk; p =.012). RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks was achieved by 54 (55.7%) pts < 65 yrs (vs 49.7% pts ≥ 65 yrs; p =.563). The median duration of RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks in responders was not estimable in pts < 65 yrs or ≥ 65 yrs (log-rank p =.879). None of the potential risk factors assessed was a significant predictor of RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks in pts < 65 yrs, possibly due to small pt number. In pts < 65 yrs with available follow-up cytogenetics (n = 71), CyR was achieved by 32 (45.1%) pts (vs 64.5% pts ≥ 65 yrs; p =.014). At time of data cutoff, 51 (52.6%) pts < 65 yrs were alive (vs 36.0% pts ≥ 65 yrs; p =.008); 29 (29.9%) pts progressed to AML (vs 20.1% pts ≥ 65 yrs; p =.077). The 1-, 2-, and 3-yr AML-progression rates were 9.7%, 15.4%, and 24.0% in pts < 65 yrs; and 6.0%, 17.9%, and 22.3% in pts ≥ 65 yrs (log-rank p =.308). The 1-, 2-, and 3-yr OS rates were 91.7%, 78.1%, and 66.4% in pts < 65 yrs; and 83.1%, 65.2%, and 49.9% in pts ≥ 65 yrs (log-rank p <.001). In pts < 65 yrs, RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks was the only factor associated with longer median OS (4.9 yrs in responders vs 2.0 yrs in non-responders) and lower BL ANC was the only factor associated with a reduced risk of AML-progression. A total of 43 (44.3% of total population) pts < 65 yrs experienced primary LEN failure and 9 (16.7% of responders) secondary failure. In pts < 65 yrs with primary failure after 16 wks (median follow up from primary failure 2.6 yrs), 13 (30.2%) pts progressed to AML (1- and 2-yr cumulative AML rates 7.9% and 16.8%) and median OS was 2.67 yrs. In pts < 65 yrs with secondary failure (median follow up from secondary failure 1.7 yrs), 3 (33.3%) pts progressed to AML and median OS was not reached (1-yr cumulative OS rate was 64.8%). Conclusions: LEN-treated pts < 65 yrs had greater incidence of IPSS Int-1-risk, had similar rates of RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks, but achieved CyR less often and more progressed to AML vs pts ≥ 65 yrs. In pts < 65 yrs, achievement of RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks was the only factor associated with longer OS. After primary or secondary LEN failure, AML progression rates were ∼30% each, and median OS 2.67 yrs and 1-yr OS 64.8%, respectively. Low-/Int-1-risk pts < 65 yrs with del5q and primary or secondary LEN failure have a relatively poor outcome and should be considered potential candidates for ASCT. Disclosures: Fenaux: Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Cephalon: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Giagounidis:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. List:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hellström-Lindberg:Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Yu:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Skikne:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Shammo:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. del Cañizo:Celgene Corporation: Spanish advisory committee.

Rituximab Plus Three Cycles of Dexamethasone In the Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): a Pilot Study.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3697-3697
Author(s):  
Rebecca Elstrom ◽  
Soo Y. Lee ◽  
James B. Bussel
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Almost All

Abstract Abstract 3697 Introduction: Rituximab has been a useful treatment for patients with ITP; many hundreds of patients have been treated. 30–40% of patients will achieve a complete remission (CR: platelet count >150 × 109/l) with initial treatment and, of this group, the CR will last at least a year in almost all patients. However, emerging data suggests that at least 40% of these patients in CR will relapse between 1 and 3 years from initial treatment suggesting that long-term “cures” only occur in 20% of the initial patients. Therefore it would be desirable if CR's could be achieved in more patients and especially if these would be durable in more than 20%. One approach would be to use rituximab maintenance, however it results in suppression of B-cells for more than 2 years. Dexamethasone has also been used to achieve “cure” in ITP especially in adults at or near diagnosis. Cheng's study suggested that approximately 50% of patients would achieve a long-term response with only one 4-day cycle of high dose (40 mg/day) dexamethasone (N Engl J Med, 2003). A follow up study from GIMEMA suggested that 3–4 cycles of dexamethasone would be better than 1 cycle (Blood, 2007). Finally, Zaja's study suggested that rituximab plus one cycle of dexamethasone was superior to dexamethasone alone with a > 50% CR rate at 6 months (Blood, 2010). Therefore, we elected to perform a pilot study to explore the combination of rituximab with three cycles of dexamethasone at 14 day intervals. Methods: Patients with ITP with platelet counts < 30,000 off therapy and in need of treatment were enrolled. The standard dose (4 infusions of 375mg/m2) rituximab was given on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 and dexamethasone 40 mg (adjusted for size) on days 1–4, 15–18, and 29–32. Results: Fourteen patients between the ages of 4 and 53 years with ITP were treated with rituximab and dexamethasone (R&D) (Table 1). All had received previous steroid therapy as well as other treatments. The median platelet count was 40,000 at initiation of rituximab (range 7,000-230,000); several patients with low counts started with dexamethasone prior to initiating Rituximab to sustain their counts during initial treatment. Patients received rituximab weekly for between 2 and 4 doses and dexamethasone for either 2 or 3 courses at intervals between 1 and 8 weeks (median 2 week intervals). A summary of the results is shown in table 2 demonstrating short-lived platelet increases in response to dexamethasone in almost all patients. With short follow up, there were 7 CR's, 3 PR's and 4 NR's. If this was divided by duration of ITP prior to R&D, there were 4 CR's and 1 NR for ≤ 12 months and 3 CR, 3 PR, and 3 NR for > 12 months. More of the children who were treated had chronic disease than did adults explaining their apparently poorer response. Observed toxicities included hyperglycemia, grade 1 and 2 liver function abnormalities, weight gain, and 1 episode of colitis requiring hospitalization. Three patients opted to skip the third cycle of dexamethasone. Conclusion: A regimen of rituximab + 2–3 courses of dexamethasone is active in patients with pretreated ITP with appreciable but usually manageable toxicity. It appears to yield superior results if administered to patients within one year of diagnosis. This combination merits further exploration in a prospective clinical trial. Disclosures: Bussel: Portola: Consultancy; Amgen: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ligand: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cangene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding.

Long-Term Safety, Efficacy, and Survival Findings From Comfort-II, a Phase 3 Study Comparing Ruxolitinib with Best Available Therapy (BAT) for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis (MF)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 801-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Cervantes ◽  
Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽  
Dietger Niederwieser ◽  
Andres Sirulnik ◽  
Viktoriya Stalbovskaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Extension Phase ◽  
Spleen Volume ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 801 Background: Ruxolitinib is a potent JAK1 & 2 inhibitor that has demonstrated superiority over traditional therapies for the treatment of MF. In the two phase 3 COMFORT studies, ruxolitinib demonstrated rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly and improved MF-related symptoms and quality of life. COMFORT-II is a randomized, open-label study evaluating ruxolitinib versus BAT in patients (pts) with MF. The primary and key secondary endpoints were both met: the proportion of pts achieving a response (defined as a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume) at wk 48 (ruxolitinib, 28.5%; BAT, 0%; P < .0001) and 24 (31.9% and 0%; P < .0001), respectively. The present analyses update the efficacy and safety findings of COMFORT-II (median follow-up, 112 wk). Methods: In COMFORT-II, 219 pts with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF and splenomegaly were randomized (2:1) to receive ruxolitinib (15 or 20 mg bid, based on baseline platelet count [100-200 × 109/L or > 200 × 109/L, respectively]) or BAT. Efficacy results are based on an intention-to-treat analysis; a loss of spleen response was defined as a > 25% increase in spleen volume over on-study nadir that is no longer a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The median follow-up was 112 wk (ruxolitinib, 113; BAT, 108), and the median duration of exposure 83.3 wk (ruxolitinib, 111.4 [randomized and extension phases]; BAT, 45.1 [randomized treatment only]). Because the core study has completed, all pts have either entered the extension phase or discontinued from the study. The primary reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (AEs; ruxolitinib, 11.6%; BAT, 6.8%), consent withdrawal (4.1% and 12.3%), and disease progression (2.7% and 5.5%). Overall, 72.6% of pts (106/146) in the ruxolitinib arm and 61.6% (45/73) in the BAT arm entered the extension phase to receive ruxolitinib, and 55.5% (81/146) of those originally randomized to ruxolitinib remained on treatment at the time of this analysis. The primary reasons for discontinuation from the extension phase were progressive disease (8.2%), AEs (2.1%), and other (4.1%). Overall, 70 pts (48.3%) treated with ruxolitinib achieved a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume at any time during the study, and 97.1% of pts (132/136) with postbaseline assessments experienced a clinical benefit with some degree of reduction in spleen volume. Spleen reductions of ≥ 35% were sustained with continued ruxolitinib therapy (median duration not yet reached); the probabilities of maintaining the spleen response at wk 48 and 84 are 75% (95% CI, 61%-84%) and 58% (95% CI, 35%-76%), respectively (Figure). Since the last report (median 61.1 wk), an additional 9 and 12 deaths were reported in the ruxolitinib and BAT arms, respectively, resulting in a total of 20 (14%) and 16 (22%) deaths overall. Although there was no inferential statistical testing at this unplanned analysis, pts randomized to ruxolitinib showed longer survival than those randomized to BAT (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27–1.00). As expected, given the mechanism of action of ruxolitinib as a JAK1 & 2 inhibitor, the most common new or worsened grade 3/4 hematologic abnormalities during randomized treatment were anemia (ruxolitinib, 40.4%; BAT, 23.3%), lymphopenia (22.6%; 31.5%), and thrombocytopenia (9.6%; 9.6%). In the ruxolitinib arm, mean hemoglobin levels decreased over the first 12 wk of treatment and then recovered to levels similar to BAT from wk 24 onward; there was no difference in the mean monthly red blood cell transfusion rate among the ruxolitinib and BAT groups (0.834 vs 0.956 units, respectively). Nonhematologic AEs were primarily grade 1/2. Including the extension phase, there were no new nonhematologic AEs in the ruxolitinib group that were not observed previously (in ≥ 10% of pts), and only 1 pt had a new grade 3/4 AE (epistaxis). Conclusion: In COMFORT-II, ruxolitinib provided rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly; this analysis demonstrates that these reductions are sustained over 2 years of treatment in the majority of pts. Ruxolitinib-treated pts showed longer survival than those receiving BAT, consistent with the survival advantage observed in previous (Verstovsek et al. NEJM. 2012) and current analyses of COMFORT-I, as well as with the comparison of pts of the phase 1/2 study with matched historical controls (Verstovsek et al. Blood. 2012). Disclosures: Cervantes: Sanofi-Aventis: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Celgene: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Pfizer: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Teva Pharmaceuticals: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: AdvisoryBoard Other, Speakers Bureau. Kiladjian:Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding. Niederwieser:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Sirulnik:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stalbovskaya:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. McQuity:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hunter:Incyte: Employment. Levy:Incyte: Employment, stock options Other. Passamonti:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Barbui:Novartis: Honoraria. Gisslinger:AOP Orphan Pharma AG: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Knoops:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harrison:Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; YM Bioscience: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Receiving Triplet Therapy in the Connect MM® Disease Registry

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4229-4229
Author(s):  
Jatin J. Shah ◽  
Rafat Abonour ◽  
Mohit Narang ◽  
Jayesh Mehta ◽  
Howard R. Terebelo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Triplet Regimen

Abstract Introduction: Triplet therapies are used for treatment (Tx) of both transplant-eligible and -ineligible patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Actual patterns and outcomes of Tx are not fully understood. Connect MM® is the first and largest multicenter, US-based, prospective observational cohort study designed to characterize Tx patterns and outcomes for pts with NDMM. This analysis describes demographic and disease characteristics of pts who received triplet Tx as an induction regimen and for whom transplant was or was not intended. The analysis explores the relationship of these factors with overall survival (OS) and other efficacy endpoints. Patients and Methods: Pts aged ≥ 18 y with NDMM within 60 days of diagnosis were eligible for enrollment regardless of disease severity, medical history, or comorbidities. Data including transplant intent (yes/no) was collected at baseline; follow-up data was collected quarterly thereafter. Based on the initial intent, 2 groups were identified: patients with intent to transplant who received transplant (TT) and pts with no intent to transplant who did not receive a transplant (NT). Triplet Tx was defined as the combination of ≥ 3 concurrent therapeutic agents in the first course of Tx (within 56 days of study entry). KM analysis adjusted for age was conducted for OS. Because decisions on use of transplant and triplet therapy are influenced by multiple factors, a multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the contribution of the triplet therapy (yes/no) to OS and was adjusted for other variables, including age, comorbidities, and ISS staging. Results: Between September 2009 and December 2011, 1493 pts were enrolled. This analysis was on 1436 pts: 650 pts with transplant intent and 786 pts without transplant intent. The data cutoff date was November 30, 2014, and the median follow-up for overall survival (OS) was 33.8 mos. Of pts with transplant intent, 451 (69%) received transplant (TT) and 199 (31%) did not. Of pts without transplant intent, 62 (8%) received transplant and 724 (92%) did not (NT). The abstract focuses on TT and NT groups only. NT pts tended to be older and have more advanced ISS staging and higher β2-microglobulin levels than TT pts (Table). The most common triplet regimen given during the first course treatment (within 56 days) was lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd). RVd was administered to 34% of the NT pts (76/225) and 59% of the TT pts (152/257). The most common non-triplet regimen was bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd), which was given to 31% of NT pts (156/499) and 38% of TT pts (73/194). Within the NT group, pts given triplet Tx had a lower risk of death than those who did not receive triplet Tx (P = .0013). The multivariable analysis found triplet Tx to be associated with a 36% reduced risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.64 [95% CI, 0.50-0.82]; P = .001). ISS disease stage (HR = 1.43 [95% CI, 1.21-1.69]; P < .001) and history of diabetes (HR = 1.38 [95% CI, 1.08-1.78]; P = .012) were negative prognostic factors for OS. Within the TT group, pts who received triplet Tx did not attain an OS benefit (P = .8993), and no baseline characteristics were significantly associated with OS. These results may be limited by other factors not considered that may have influenced physicians' choice of treatment, including the use of maintenance therapy and a short follow-up period of 33.8 months. Conclusions: Triplet Tx as a first regimen is associated with longer OS in pts without transplant intent who did not receive a transplant. RVd and Vd were the most common first Tx regimens, respectively. Continued follow-up of these pts and enrollment of an additional cohort will provide additional data with mature follow-up. Table 1. Table 1. Disclosures Shah: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Abonour:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Narang:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Mehta:Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau. Terebelo:Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacylics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Gasparetto:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Other: Export Board Committee, Speakers Bureau. Toomey:Celgene: Consultancy. Hardin:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Srinivasan:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Larkins:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Nagarwala:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rifkin:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Complete Molecular and Hematologic Response in Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Following Treatment with Blinatumomab: Results from a Phase 2 Single-Arm, Multicenter Study (ALCANTARA)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 679-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Hervé Dombret ◽  
Patrice Chevallier ◽  
Oliver G. Ottmann ◽  
Nicola Goekbuget ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Pcr Amplification ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
T315i Mutation ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction. Prognosis of patients (pts) with R/R Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL is dismal despite the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) which may be used as single agents or in combination regimens. Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engaging (BiTE®) antibody construct that has shown antileukemic activity. Among adults with R/R Ph-negative ALL receiving blinatumomab, 43% achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) during the first two cycles (Topp MS et al. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:57). We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of blinatumomab in pts with R/R Ph+ ALL who progressed after or were intolerant to a 2nd or later (2+) generation TKI. Methods. Eligible adult pts (≥18 years) had Ph+ B-precursor ALL and had relapsed after or were refractory to at least one 2+ generation TKI; or were intolerant to 2+ generation TKI and intolerant or refractory to imatinib. All pts had to have >5% blasts in the bone marrow and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2. Blinatumomab was dosed by continuous IV infusion (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) for up to 5 cycles (9 μg/d on days 1-7 in cycle 1, and 28 μg/d thereafter). The primary endpoint was CR or CRh during the first two cycles; minimal residual disease (MRD) response based on RT-PCR amplification of BCR-ABL per central laboratory, relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) rate were key secondary endpoints. Complete MRD response was defined as no RT-PCR amplification of BCR-ABL at a sensitivity of 10-5. Results. Of 45 treated pts, 44 were resistant to 2+ generation TKI; one patient was resistant to imatinib and never exposed to 2+ generation TKI (protocol deviation). 53% of pts were men. Median (range) age was 55 (23-78) years (≥65 years, 27%). Ten pts (22%) had a BCR-ABL gene with T315I mutation. All pts had received prior TKI (dasatinib, 87%; ponatinib, 51%; imatinib, 56%; nilotinib, 36%; bosutinib, 2%), with 60% having received ≥ 2 prior 2+ generation TKI; most pts (96%) had received prior chemotherapy. 38% of pts had ≥ 2 prior relapses and 44% had prior alloHSCT. Efficacy outcomes for key endpoints are shown in the table. 16 pts achieved CR/CRh during the first two cycles for a response rate of 36% (95% CI: 22%, 51%); of those, 14 pts achieved CR, most of them (10/14, 71%) in cycle 1. The patient who never received 2+ generation TKI did not respond to treatment. 12 of the 14 pts (86%) with CR and two of the two pts with CRh achieved a complete MRD response. Among the 10 pts with T315I mutation, four achieved CR/CRh; all four also achieved a complete MRD response. Eight CR/CRh responders (50%) relapsed, three during treatment (including two with CR who did not achieve complete MRD response). One patient died in CR post alloHSCT. Median (95% CI) RFS was 6.7 (4.4, not estimable) months (median follow-up, 9.0 months); median OS was 7.1 (5.6, not estimable) months (median follow-up, 8.8 months). Patient incidence of grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) was 82%, most commonly febrile neutropenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (22%), anemia (16%), and pyrexia (11%). Five pts had fatal AEs; one (septic shock) was considered treatment-related by the investigator. Three pts discontinued because of AEs. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in three pts (all grade 1 or 2). 21 pts (47%) had neurologic events (paraesthesia, 13%; confusional state, 11%; dizziness, 9%; tremor, 9%); three pts had grade 3 neurologic events (aphasia, hemiplegia; and depressed level of consciousness and nervous system disorder), one of which (aphasia) required treatment interruption. Conclusion. In this population of pts with R/R Ph+ ALL who have very poor prognosis after failure of 2+ generation TKI therapy, treatment with CD19-targeted immunotherapy blinatumomab as single agent showed antileukemic activity. AEs were consistent with those previously reported for pts with R/R Ph-negative ALL treated with blinatumomab. Table 1. Table 1. Disclosures Martinelli: Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; MSD: Consultancy. Dombret:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ottmann:Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Goekbuget:Bayer: Equity Ownership; Eusapharma/Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Erytech: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Medac: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SigmaTau: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Sanofi: Equity Ownership; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Topp:Astra: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel Support; Jazz: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support. Fielding:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sterling:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Benjamin:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stein:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding.

Romiplostim in Thrombocytopenic Patients with Low- or Int-1- Risk MDS Results in Reduced Bleeding without Impacting Leukemic Progression: Final Follow-up Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2000-2000
Author(s):  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Pierre Fenaux ◽  
Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽  
Jeffrey Szer ◽  
Uwe Platzbecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Thrombocytopenia occurs in ~50% of patients with low/int-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and is associated with reduced survival. In a placebo (PBO)-controlled study, 250 patients with MDS were randomized 2:1 to receive weekly romiplostim or PBO. In the original June 2011 analysis, romiplostim reduced clinically significant bleeding events [hazard ratio (HR) romiplostim vs PBO 0.83, 95% CI: 0.66−1.05, P = 0.13] and platelet transfusions (relative risk 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66−0.88, P<0.001) and increased IWG hematologic improvement platelets (HI-P) incidence (odds ratio 15.6, 95% CI: 4.7−51.8, P<0.001). Peripheral blast count increases >10% were more frequent with romiplostim (25/167, 15%) than PBO (3/83, 3.6%) and resolved after discontinuation in most cases. In February 2011, the DMC recommended that treatment with study drug be discontinued as the potential benefit seen in the reduction of bleeding did not outweigh the potential risk for disease progression to AML, and that transient increases in blast cell counts might put patients at risk for diagnosis of and treatment for AML. Patients were moved into long-term follow-up (LTFU). Previously reported (Giagounidis et al, Cancer 2014) 58-week incidence of AML was 6.0% (N = 10) for romiplostim and 4.9% for PBO (N = 4); HR 1.20 (95% CI: 0.38−3.84). This report provides final 5-year LTFU data. Methods: Eligible patients were receiving only supportive care and had IPSS low/int-1 risk MDS and platelets 1) ≤20 × 109/L or 2) ≤50 × 109/L with a history of bleeding. Disease progression to AML was defined as 1) ≥20% blasts in bone marrow or peripheral blood after 4 weeks following discontinuation of romiplostim; 2) pathology consistent with leukemia; or 3) antileukemic treatment. Results are presented by treatment group. Results: At baseline, median (Q1, Q3) age was 70 (61, 77) years, the majority (59%) of patients were male; 27.6% were IPSS low risk and 72.4% were int-1 risk. WHO classifications were RCMD: 67.6%, RAEB-1: 13.2%, MDS-U: 11.2%, RA: 4.4%, RCMD-RS: 2.4%, RARS: 0.8%, and RAEB-2: 0.4%. Of 250 patients in the study, 210 entered LTFU and 66 completed the 5 years of LTFU; median (Q1, Q3) follow-up was 27.5 (10.8, 58.7) months. Reasons for discontinuation (death, lost to follow-up, and consent withdrawal) during LTFU were similar in both groups. During the active study period and LTFU, death was reported in 93 (55.7%) patients in the romiplostim group and 45 (54.2%) patients in the PBO group (HR romiplostim vs PBO 1.03, 95% CI: 0.72−1.47) (Figure); mortality rates were greater in those with IPSS int-1 vs low risk for both groups (Table). AML was reported in 20 (11.9%) patients in the romiplostim group and 9 (11.0%) patients in the PBO group (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.48−2.33). The proportions of patients who either died or developed AML were 56.9% (N = 95) in the romiplostim group and 55.4% (N = 46) in the PBO group (HR for AML-free survival 1.04, 95% CI: 0.73−1.48) (Figure). Nearly half (N = 14, 48%) of the 29 AML cases occurred in patients who were RAEB-1 at screening (none RAEB-2), and 6 cases were diagnosed because of anti-AML treatment use alone (Table). In LTFU, patient-reported use of MDS therapy (eg, azacitidine or cyclosporine) was 42.8% (N = 59, 95% CI: 34.4%−51.5%) in the romiplostim group and 31.4% (N = 22, 95% CI: 20.9%−43.6%) in the PBO group. AML therapy (eg, chemotherapy) was used in 14 (10.2%) patients in the romiplostim group and 7 (10.0%) patients in the PBO group. Conclusions: Following the decision in 2011 to stop study drug secondary to increased AML rates at that time and transient blasts increases, final 5-year LTFU HRs (romiplostim vs placebo) for death or progression to AML, respectively, are 1.03 (95% CI: 0.72−1.47) and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.48−2.33). In conclusion, romiplostim reduced bleeding events and platelet transfusions, with no increase in AML incidence or impact on survival. Disclosures Kantarjian: Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Fenaux:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium/Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Szer:Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Alexion Australia: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Platzbecker:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kuendgen:Celgene: Research Funding. Gaidano:Morphosys: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wiktor-Jedrzejczak:Angelini: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Sandoz: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Carpenter:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mehta:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Franklin:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Giagounidis:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Five-Year Experience with Single-Agent Ibrutinib in Patients with Previously Untreated and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 233-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. O'Brien ◽  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
Steven E. Coutre ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Jan Burger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background: Ibrutinib (ibr), a first-in-class, once-daily Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved by the US FDA for treatment of patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) including pts with del17p. The phase 1b/2 PCYC-1102 trial showed single-agent efficacy and tolerability in treatment-naïve (TN; O'Brien, Lancet Oncol 2014) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL/SLL (Byrd, N Engl J Med 2013). We report efficacy and safety results of the longest follow-up to date for ibr-treated pts. Methods: Pts received 420 or 840 mg ibr QD until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Overall response rate (ORR) including partial response (PR) with lymphocytosis (PR-L) was assessed using updated iwCLL criteria. Responses were assessed by risk groups: unmutated IGVH, complex karyotype (CK; ≥3 unrelated chromosomal abnormalities by stimulated cytogenetics assessed by a reference lab), and in hierarchical order for del17p, then del11q. In the long-term extension study PCYC-1103, grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs requiring dose reduction or discontinuation were collected. Results: Median age of the 132 pts with CLL/SLL (31 TN, 101 R/R) was 68 y (range, 37-84) with 43% ≥70 y. Baseline CK was observed in 41/112 (37%) of pts. Among R/R pts, 34 (34%) had del17p, 35 (35%) del11q, and 79 (78%) unmutated IGVH. R/R pts had a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1-12). Median time on study was 46 m (range, 0-67) for all-treated pts, 60 m (range, 0-67.4) for TN pts, and 39 m (range, 0-67) for R/R pts. The ORR (per investigator) was 86% (complete response [CR], 14%) for all-treated pts (TN: 84% [CR, 29%], R/R: 86% [CR, 10%]). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached (NR) for TN and 52 m for R/R pts with 60 m estimated PFS rates of 92% and 43%, respectively (Figure 1). In R/R pts, median PFS was 55 m (95% confidence intervals [CI], 31-not estimable [NE]) for pts with del11q, 26 m (95% CI,18-37) for pts with del17p, and NR (95% CI, 40-NE) for pts without del17p, del11q, trisomy 12, or del13q. Median PFS was 33 m (95% CI, 22-NE) and NR for pts with and without CK, and 43 m (95% CI, 32-NE) and 63 m (95% CI, 7-NE) for pts with unmutated and mutated IGVH, respectively(Figure 2). Among R/R pts, median PFS was 63 m (95% CI, 37-NE) for pts with 1-2 prior regimens (n=27, 3 pts with 1 prior therapy) and 59 m (95% CI, 22-NE) and 39 m (95% CI, 26-NE) for pts with 3 and ≥4 prior regimens, respectively. Median duration of response was NR for TN pts and 45 m for R/R pts. Pts estimated to be alive at 60 m were: TN, 92%; all R/R, 57%; R/R del17p, 32%; R/R del 11q, 61%; R/R unmutated IGVH, 55%. Among all treated pts, onset of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs was highest in the first year and decreased during subsequent years. With about 5 years of follow-up, the most frequent grade ≥3 AEs were hypertension (26%), pneumonia (22%), neutropenia (17%), and atrial fibrillation (9%). Study treatment was discontinued due to AEs in 27 pts (20%) and disease progression in 34 pts (26%). Of all treated pts, 38% remain on ibr treatment on study including 65% of TN pts and 30% of R/R pts. Conclusions: Single-agent ibrutinib continues to show durable responses in pts with TN or R/R CLL/SLL including those with del17p, del11q, or unmutated IGVH. With extended treatment, CRs were observed in 29% of TN and 10% of R/R pts, having evolved over time. Ibrutinib provided better PFS outcomes if administered earlier in therapy than in the third-line or beyond. Those without CK experienced more favorable PFS and OS than those with CK. Ibrutinib was well tolerated with the onset of AEs decreasing over time, allowing for extended dosing for 65% of TN and 30% of R/R pts who continue treatment. Disclosures O'Brien: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Furman:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Coutre:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Flinn:Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; RainTree Oncology Services: Equity Ownership. Burger:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Roche: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Sharman:Gilead: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Wierda:Abbvie: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Jones:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Luan:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. James:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. Chu:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Interim Results from a Phase 1/2 Clinical Study of Lentiglobin Gene Therapy for Severe Sickle Cell Disease

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1176-1176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Kanter ◽  
Mark C. Walters ◽  
Matthew M. Hsieh ◽  
Lakshmanan Krishnamurti ◽  
Janet Kwiatkowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Globin Gene ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cell Dose ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract β-globin gene transfer into hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) has the potential to reduce or eliminate the symptoms and long-term complications of severe sickle cell disease (SCD). LentiGlobin Drug Product (DP) is a gene therapy product containing autologous CD34+ cells transduced with the BB305 lentiviral vector. BB305 encodes a human β-globin gene containing a single point mutation (AT87Q) designed to confer anti-sickling properties similar to those observed in fetal hemoglobin (γ-globin). In two ongoing studies, subjects with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (Studies HGB-204 and HGB-205) or SCD (Study HGB-205) receiving LentiGlobin DP have demonstrated sustained expression of 3-9 g/dL therapeutic hemoglobin (HbAT87Q) and have shown marked improvements in clinical symptoms 1 year post-treatment. Study HGB-206 is a multi-center, Phase 1/2 safety and efficacy study of LentiGlobin DP in adults with severe SCD. We previously (ASH 2015) presented results from 2 subjects, who had 3 and 6 months of follow-up after LentiGlobin treatment. We now present data from 7 treated subjects, 4 of whom have ≥6 months of follow-up data. Subjects (≥18 years of age) with severe SCD (history of recurrent vaso-occlusive crisis [VOC], acute chest syndrome, stroke, or tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity of >2.5 m/s) were screened for eligibility. Following bone marrow harvest (BMH), CD34+ cells were transduced with the BB305 vector. Subjects underwent myeloablative conditioning with busulfan prior to infusion of the transduced cells. Safety assessments include adverse events (AEs), integration site analysis (ISA) and surveillance for replication competent lentivirus (RCL). After infusion, subjects are monitored for hematologic engraftment, vector copy number (VCN), HbAT87Q expression, and other laboratory and clinical parameters. As of July 2016, 7 subjects with severe SCD (median age: 26 years, range 18-42 years) have received LentiGlobin DP in this study. All subjects successfully underwent BMH, with a median of 2 harvests required (range 1-4). Fifteen Grade 3 AEs in 5 subjects were attributed to BMH: pain (n=10), anemia (n=3) and VOC (n=2); all resolved with standard measures. Table 1 summarizes cell harvest, DP characteristics, and lab results. The median LentiGlobin DP cell dose was 2.1x10e6 CD34+ cells/kg (range 1.6-5.1) and DP VCN was 0.6 (0.3-1.3) copies/diploid genome. Median post-infusion follow-up as of July 2016 is 7.1 months (3.7-12.7 months). All subjects successfully engrafted after receiving LentiGlobin DP, with a median time to neutrophil engraftment of 22 days (17-29 days). The toxicity profile observed from start of conditioning to latest follow-up was consistent with myeloablative conditioning with single-agent busulfan. To date, there have been no DP-related ≥Grade 3 AEs or serious AEs, and no evidence of clonal dominance or RCL. The BB305 vector remains detectable at low levels in the peripheral blood of all subjects infused, with median VCN 0.08 (0.05-0.13, n=7) at last measurement. All subjects express HbAT87Q, with a median of 0.4g/dL (0.1-1.0 g/dL, n=7) at 3 months; most subjects demonstrated modest increases over time, and the 2 subjects with the longest follow-up expressed 0.31 and 1.2 g/dL HbAT87Q at 9 months. All 4 subjects with ≥6 months of follow-up experienced multiple VOCs in the 2 years prior to study entry (2-27.5 VOCs annually). Since LentiGlobin DP infusion, 3 of these 4 subjects have had fewer VOCs, although this trend may be confounded by the short follow-up, the effects of transplant conditioning, and/or post-transplant RBC transfusions. The decrease in VCN between DP and peripheral cells contrasts with previous reports of successful LentiGlobin gene therapy in ongoing studies HGB-204 and HGB-205. The relatively low in vivo VCN in this study appears to result in the lower HbAT87Q expression seen to date. We are exploring multiple hypotheses as to the etiology of the VCN drop between DP and peripheral blood, including the adverse impact of sickle marrow pathology on HSCs, the adequacy of myeloablation, and the magnitude of the transduced cell dose. We will provide an update on study data and ongoing efforts to increase in vivo VCN in patients with SCD, such as increasing the transduced cell dose through alternate HSC procurement methods or enhancing the DP VCN through manufacturing improvements. Disclosures Kanter: Novartis: Consultancy. Walters:Bayer HealthCare: Honoraria; AllCells, Inc./LeukoLab: Other: Medical Director ; ViaCord Processing Laboratory: Other: Medical Director ; Leerink Partners, LLC: Consultancy; Kiadis Pharma: Honoraria; bluebirdBio, Inc: Honoraria. Kwiatkowski:Ionis pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Sideris Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Apopharma: Research Funding; Luitpold Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. von Kalle:bluebird bio: Consultancy; GeneWerk: Equity Ownership. Kuypers:Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute: Employment; bluebird bio: Consultancy. Leboulch:bluebird bio: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Joseney-Antoine:bluebird bio: Employment, Equity Ownership. Asmal:bluebird bio: Employment, Equity Ownership. Thompson:bluebird bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Baxalta (now part of Shire): Research Funding; ApoPharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mast: Research Funding; Eli Lily: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Cladribine Combined with Idarubicin and High-Dose AraC (CLIA2) As a Frontline and Salvage Treatment for Young Patients (≤65 yrs) with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4039-4039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mansour Alfayez ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Marina Y. Konopleva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽  
Intrathecal Therapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background Nucleoside analogues such as cladribine can increase the efficacy of cytarabine (araC) by modulating deoxycytidine kinase. The addition of cladribine to standard 7+3 chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival in pts with AML (Holowiecki JCO 2012). Results of our part-1 phase-2 clinical trial (cladribine combined with intermediate dose araC and idarubicin (CLIA1)) reported promising results that exceeded pretreatment expectations for response and tolerability (Jain, et. al. ASH 2016). Based on that, and the benefit of higher doses of cytarabine in younger patients (UK-MRC AML, Willemze JCO 2014), we investigated a higher dose of araC in combination with cladribine and idarubicin (CLIA2). Methods Non-APL, non-core binding factor AML pts 18-65 yrs of age with adequate organ function were enrolled in 1 of 3 cohorts: de novo AML, secondary AML (s-AML), or relapsed/refractory AML (R/R). Induction was cladribine 5 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes on days 1-5, followed by araC 2g/m2 IV on days 1-5, and idarubicin 10 mg/m2 IV days 1-3. Consolidation consisted of up to 5 more cycles of CLIA2 for 3 days instead of 5. Dose-adjustments were allowed for age and PS. Sorafenib or midostaurin was added for pts with FLT3 mutations which occurred in 35% of pts on this study. Prophylactic intrathecal therapy was offered to higher risk pts at count nadir during cycle 1. Mutation profiling was performed using next generation sequencing prior to starting therapy. Results 65 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 47 yrs (range, 24-65): 37 pts (57%) in the frontline, 12 (19%) pts in the s-AML, and 16 (25%) in the R/R cohorts. Pt characteristics and outcomes by cohort are outlined in Table 1. The most commonly detected mutations at baseline were TET2 (45%), DNMT3a (37%), FLT3 (35%), ASXL1 (28%), and NPM1 (28%). Of 35 evaluable pts in the frontline cohort, 31 responded (ORR=89%) with 27 CR (77%) and 4 CRi (11%). Among the responders, 61% were negative for minimal residual disease (MRD [-]) by multiparameter flow cytometry. In the s-AML cohort, 10 pts were evaluable with an ORR of 60% (6/10) with 5 CR (50%) and 1 CRp (10%); 4 (67%) were MRD [-]. In the R/R cohort, 14 pts, previously treated with a median of 1 (1-4) prior therapy were evaluable for response. There were 7 CR (50%), 1 CRi (7%), for ORR of 57%; and 63% were MRD [-]. The median OS was not reached in the frontline and s-AML cohorts with median follow up of 5.2 and 11.5, months, respectively. In the R/R cohort, the median follow up was 4.7 months and median OS was 6.7 months [Figure.1]. Relapse-free survival was not reached in frontline and salvage cohort, and was 9.1 months in s-AML with median follow up of 5.2, 3.9, and 3.5 months in frontline, s-AML, and salvage cohorts, respectively [Figure.2]. The regimen was well tolerated. The most common ≥ grade 3 possibly-related non-hematologic adverse events were fever/infection (38), bleeding (2), and abnormal liver function test (3). Conclusion The 3-drug combination with a higher dose of araC, CLIA2, is safe and effective in younger pts with AML. Compared to our prior experience in pts with s-AML, using higher dose of cytarabine in CLIA2 for this cohort seems to have the highest impact. This trend however was also seen in the salvage and frontline cohorts when compared to the results from CLIA1. Response rates for pts in the newly-diagnosed AML, s-AML, and in the salvage settings are promising and should be explored further in larger studies and compared to current standard regimens. Disclosures Ravandi: Jazz: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Orsenix: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Orsenix: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Konopleva:Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding. Daver:Otsuka: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Kiromic: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Sunesis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding. DiNardo:Bayer: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Medimmune: Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy. Bose:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc.: Research Funding. Andreeff:SentiBio: Equity Ownership; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy; Oncoceutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eutropics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Oncolyze: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy; Aptose: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Reata: Equity Ownership; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: MDM2 inhibitor activity patent, Research Funding; United Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: GD2 inhibition in breast cancer . Pemmaraju:abbvie: Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; SagerStrong Foundation: Research Funding; stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; plexxikon: Research Funding; daiichi sankyo: Research Funding; Affymetrix: Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jabbour:novartis: Research Funding. Cortes:novartis: Research Funding. Kadia:Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Single UM171 Expanded Cord Blood Permits Transplantation of Better HLA Matched Cords with Excellent Gvhd Relapse Free Survival

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4658-4658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Cohen ◽  
Jean Roy ◽  
Silvy Lachance ◽  
Anne Marinier ◽  
Jean-Sébastien Delisle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Culture System ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cell Dose ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Cord blood (CB) transplants have fallen into disfavor in large part due to low cell dose leading to prolonged hospitalizations and high transplant related mortality (TRM). UM171, a novel and potent agonist of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) self-renewal could solve this major limitation, allowing for CB's important qualities of lower risk of chronic GVHD and relapse to prevail. In addition, UM171 could permit transplantation of smaller, better HLA matched cords, associated with lower TRM. Hence, we initiated a clinical trial to test the safety and efficacy of UM171 expanded CB (eCB). Our goal was to design a clinically viable eCB transplant with a TRM as low or lower than other HSC sources all the while maintaining CB's low relapse rate. Patients (pts) received a myeloablative conditioning regimen. On day (D)-7 of transplant, CB was thawed and CD34+ selected. The CD34- lymphocyte containing fraction was cryopreserved and infused on D+1. The CD34+ component was placed in a closed culture system with UM171 and media was injected once a day until D0, when cells were washed and infused. This fed-batch culture system allowed for small culture volumes, saving cost and labor. Between 7/16-6/18, 21 adult pts (median age 44 years) were transplanted with an eCB. Median final culture volume and net viable CD34 fold expansion were 670 mL and 35, respectively. Median 1st day of 100 and 500 neutrophils were D+10 and D+18, respectively. Achieving 100 neutrophils was 5 days faster than seen with our pts receiving peripheral blood (PB) or marrow (BM) and appeared cell dose independent, suggesting that clinically meaningful expansion of an early repopulating myeloid progenitor is at saturation even with smaller CBs. In contrast, attaining 500 neutrophils was accelerated but dependent on cell dose. More importantly, pts appeared to derive clinical benefit beyond neutrophil engraftment (defined as 500 neutrophils). Pts' median last day of fever prior to 500 neutrophils was D+8, much earlier than engraftment and 4 days earlier than seen with our PB-BM pts. We offer 2 hypotheses as explanation: i) 100 neutrophils, which are attained early, provide significant defense against infection, ii) the graft contains a significant proportion of dendritic cell precursors (30-40%) which offer mucosal protection during severe neutropenia. Duration of hospitalization was shorter by 12 days and longer by 2 days compared to our non eCB and PB-BM transplants, respectively. In addition, because cell dose requirements were lower, 12/21 pts received a better HLA matched CB, thus >80% of patients were transplanted with a ≥6/8 HLA matched eCB. As a result of lower minimal cell dose criteria, we can now use ∼half the CBs in the banks instead of only 5% for a 70 kg patient. Platelet engraftment occurred at a median of 42 days. With a median follow up of 14 months, there has been no CMV disease, no PTLD, 2 adenovirus cystitis, 2 (10%) grade 3-4 acute GVHD, no moderate/severe chronic GVHD and 1 TRM (5%) despite a median comorbidity index of 2 (0-5). Full donor chimerism was achieved in all cell subsets. Immune recovery was faster than seen in our unrelated donor transplants who routinely receive ATG prophylaxis with 196, 300 and 413 CD4+/µL at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Interestingly, transcriptome analysis of UM171-eCB cells shows an enhanced lymphoid progenitor-associated gene signature when compared to DMSO exposed cells. Animals transplanted with UM171-eCB cells showed a 20 to 35-fold increase in thymic cellularity at 8 weeks post-transplant. Despite some very high risk pts in our trial, only 3 relapsed. Overall, progression free, and GVHD/relapse free survival (GRFS) are excellent at 95, 77 and 67%, respectively, at 12 months. A 7 day UM171 single eCB protocol is feasible and provides clinical benefits beyond faster engraftment with fewer infectious complications, better HLA matching and very low TRM, all the while saving production and hospitalization costs. Nevertheless, longer follow up will be required to better assess relapse howbeit encouraging preliminary results. Furthermore, patients' quality of life is paramount and best evaluated by GRFS which is excellent thanks to a very low rate of significant chronic GVHD all the while maintaining a low risk of relapse. In conclusion, this 1st trial documents the potency of UM171 and positions UM171-eCB as a promising HSC source which could compete with the current standard of care. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Cohen: ExCellThera: Patents & Royalties: Royalities from sales of UM171. Roy:ExCellThera: Patents & Royalties: Royalities from sales of UM171. Lachance:ExCellThera: Patents & Royalties: Royalities from sales of UM171. Roy:Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont: Patents & Royalties: Author on patent; Kiadis Pharma: Other: Travel support; University of Montreal: Patents & Royalties: Author on patent. Busque:BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Paladin: Consultancy. Kiss:Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Otsuka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Caudrelier:ExCellThera: Employment. Zandstra:ExCellThera: Equity Ownership. Sauvageau:ExCellThera: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document