Clinical Trial Design Features of Myelofibrosis Trials during the Last Decade: Comprehensive Review of Clinicaltrials.Gov Data 2010-2019

Introduction: FDA approval of JAK2-inhibitors for myelofibrosis (MF) has changed the landscape for treatment introducing possible increased complexity of clinical trial designs in MF. Many patients with MF will have insufficient response or intolerance to ruxolitinib, opening an opportunity for testing of novel agents alone or in combination. Novel trial designs exist for early stage (phase 1 and 2) studies. The Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research Consortium (MPN-RC) is an NCI-funded academic group of laboratory and clinical scientists working to develop and evaluate treatments that will improve the survival of patients with MPNs focused on early stage trials in MF. This review was undertaken to understand the landscape of MF clinical trials and improve our approach to trial design. Methods: Studies with "myelofibrosis" as a condition were abstracted from clinicaltrials.gov using an application programming interface from 2010-2019 and reviewed for phase, trial design features, and endpoints. Trial design review captured such features as presence of dose escalation and approach (rule-based versus model-based/assisted) in the phase 1 setting. Observational and behavioral based studies were excluded. A total of 165 treatment interventional studies including MF patients (either MF as the primary cohort, or MF along with other MPN, myelodysplastic syndrome, or hematologic malignancies related cohorts) were reviewed. Primary and secondary endpoints were reviewed for quality of life, symptoms, or other patient-reported outcomes (PRO). Results: A median of 16.5 (range 13-20) trials were initiated per year; 92 (56%) phase 2, 54 (33%) phase 1; 17 (10%) phase 3 and 2 (1%) phase 4, with 77 (47%) industry sponsored (Figure 1). Among phase 1 trials, 41/54 (76%) included dose escalation, the majority employing a standard 3+3 design (or other rule-based design) or not specifically detailing the dose escalation schema. Less than 5 dose escalation trials were explicitly described as model-based or model-assisted. Almost half of the phase 1 trials (23/54; 43%) included combination treatment, with 17/23 (74%) using ruxolitinib or fedratinib. Among phase 2 trials, 82 (89%) were non-randomized and 10 (11%) randomized trials; 35/92 (38%) involved combination treatment and 57 (62%) single agent. Median actual/target enrollment for the phase 3 trials (n=16) was 192 patients (range 49-2233 patients); only 2 phase 3 trials were > 500 patients. Median number of total outcomes was 6.0 (range 1-28) across all studies with a median of 5.5 (range 1-28) for 2010-2014 versus 7.0 (range 1-22) for 2015-2019 (p=0.09). Overall 63/165 (38%) studies included at least one PRO endpoint; 15 (28%) phase 1, 33 (36%) phase 2 and 14 (82%) phase 3. Inclusion of PRO endpoints for years 2010-2014 was similar to studies started in years 2015-2019 [31/82 (38%) and 32/83 (39%)]. Industry sponsored studies included PRO endpoints more frequently [46/77 (60%) versus 17/88 (19%); p<0.001] than non-industry sponsored trials but this is primarily due to a higher proportion of phase 3/4 trials (n=17) being conducted by industry versus non-industry (n=2) (Figure 2). Conclusions: For phase 1 trials in MF, few dose-escalation trials included model-based or model-assisted methods. These designs are encouraged in order to maximize therapeutic benefits in MF, a rare cancer. Clinical trial designs in myelofibrosis have shifted in recent years as evidenced by an increase in number of endpoints, likely to accommodate new challenges in the post JAK2-inhibitors approval era. Use of patient-reported outcomes including quality of life and symptom assessment was high in the phase 3 setting, and continued use should be encouraged as endpoint assessments in MF clinical trial designs. Disclosures Mascarenhas: Celgene, Prelude, Galecto, Promedior, Geron, Constellation, and Incyte: Consultancy; Incyte, Kartos, Roche, Promedior, Merck, Merus, Arog, CTI Biopharma, Janssen, and PharmaEssentia: Other: Research funding (institution). Mesa:LaJolla Pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Sierra Onc: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Samus: Research Funding. Hoffman:Dompe: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forbius: Consultancy; Protagonist: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Navitoclax (ABT-263) Plus Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide/Rituximab (FCR) or Bendamustine/Rituximab (BR): A Phase 1 Study In Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2455.2455 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2455-2455 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Thomas J. Kipps ◽

William G. Wierda ◽

Jeffrey A. Jones ◽

Lode J. Swinnen ◽

Jianning Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Anti Tumor Activity

Abstract Abstract 2455 Background: Navitoclax (ABT-263), a novel, orally bioavailable, small molecule, binds with high affinity (Ki ≤1nM) to Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-w, promoting apoptosis. In vitro, navitoclax shows potent targeted cytotoxicity (EC50 ≤ 1μM) against T and B lymphoid malignancies that over-express Bcl-2. A phase 1 trial demonstrated oral navitoclax monotherapy to be well-tolerated and to have anti-tumor activity in patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, thrombocytopenia (TCP) was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Phase 3 studies showed improved outcomes in CLL pts with the fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) combination, and a phase 2 trial showed bendamustine/rituximab (BR) to be effective for pts with relapsed or refractory CLL. Navitoclax enhanced R (monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy) efficacy in preclinical models of B-cell lymphoma. Methods: This is an ongoing, international, phase 1 dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral navitoclax in combination with FCR (Arm A) or BR (Arm B) in pts with relapsed/refractory CLL. Secondary objectives are efficacy endpoints (PFS, ORR, TTP, OS, duration of response). Eligible pts had measurable disease, ECOG performance score ≤1, ANC ≥100/μL, platelets ≥100,000/mm3, and hemoglobin ≥9.0 g/dL. Preliminary results are reported. After obtaining informed consent, pts were assigned to Arm A or Arm B based on physician preference, each consisting of 28-day dose-escalation cycles with once-daily, pre-infusion, navitoclax treatment on Days 3–5 of Cycle 1 and Days 1–3 of subsequent cycles. In both arms, R was 375 mg/m2 on Day 1 of Cycle 1; and 500 mg/m2 on Day 2 of Cycle 2 and on Day 1 of subsequent cycles. In Arm A, F 25 mg/m2 and C 175 mg/m2 were dosed on Days 2–4 in Cycles 1 and 2, and on Days 1–3 in subsequent cycles. In Arm B, B was dosed at 70 mg/m2 on Days 2 and 3 of Cycles 1 and 2, and on Days 1 and 2 in subsequent cycles. Navitoclax starting dose was 110 mg daily. Dose escalation to the next cohort (200 mg) was according to a continuous reassessment model. Tumor responses were evaluated using NCI-WG 1996 criteria. Pts could continue on navitoclax therapy for 1 yr in the absence of progressive disease or significant toxicity. Results: As of July 2010, 7 pts enrolled in the initially prioritized Arm B (BR+navitoclax); all completed the first cohort of 110 mg (median age 60 yr [range 55–72]). Study sites are currently enrolling pts in Arm A (FCR+navitoclax); 2 pts have enrolled to date. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–7). One pt had a DLT of elevated AST (Arm B, 110 mg cohort) and 1 pt had a DLT of neutropenic fever (Arm A, 110 mg cohort). In Arm B, neither TCP nor neutropenia have been DLTs. For the 7 pts with navitoclax-related AEs, the most common were diarrhea (3 pts), nausea (5 pts), and fatigue (3 pts). Seven pts remain on study; 2 pts discontinued due to disease progression and 2 withdrew per physician preference. In Arm B, preliminary antitumor best responses were assessable in 4 pts who received 2 cycles; 1 CRi in a pt with del17p- (based on lymph node [LN] response and no morphologic evidence of CLL in the bone marrow), 2 unconfirmed CRs (based on LN response and no bone marrow at this time), and 1 PR in a pt with del17p- (this pt subsequently received an allogeneic stem cell transplant). Preliminary PK results for the Arm B 110 mg cohort indicated that navitoclax PK was similar in Cycle 1 (navitoclax+BR) and Cycle 2 (navitoclax alone), and appeared comparable to PK in the navitoclax monotherapy study. Conclusions: Early results show that the combination of navitoclax with BR is well-tolerated, without DLTs of TCP or neutropenia, and show evidence of anti-tumor activity. Data are limited in the FCR portion of the study. The maximum tolerated dose of navitoclax has not been reached. Accrual is ongoing and following completion of the dose-escalation components of this study, expanded cohorts of pts will be assessed using the recommended phase 2 dose of navitoclax to further assess the tolerability and dose, and to continue to explore for efficacy signals in combinations. Preliminary data in combination with BR are encouraging. Disclosures: Kipps: Abbott Laboratories: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding. Wierda: Abbott: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jones: Glaxo Smith-Kline: Consultancy; Abbott: Research Funding. Swinnen: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Yang: Abbott: Employment. Cui: Abbott: Employment. Busman: Abbott: Employment. Krivoshik: Abbott: Employment. Enschede: Abbott: Employment. Humerickhouse: Abbott: Employment.

Download Full-text

Preliminary Results from a Phase 1/2, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Clinical Trial of IMO-8400 in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1540.1540 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1540-1540 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Sheeba K. Thomas ◽

Wael A. Harb ◽

Joseph Thaddeus Beck ◽

Gabrail Nashat ◽

M. Lia Palomba ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Preliminary Evidence ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Open Label ◽

Label Dose ◽

Myd88 L265p Mutation ◽

Myd88 L265p

Abstract Introduction: Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare, indolent B-cell lymphoma characterized by lymphoplasmacytic cell infiltration of bone marrow and elevated serum levels of immunoglobulin M (IgM) protein. Despite recent advances in treatment the disease relapses in most patients. About 90% of WM patients harbor the MYD88 L265P oncogenic mutation. MYD88 is an adapter protein in the Toll-like receptor (TLR) pathway. The MYD88 L265P oncoprotein has been shown to amplify TLR 7 and 9 signaling, leading to downstream activation of NF-κB and cytokine signaling pathways that promote tumor cell survival and proliferation (Lim, AACR 2013). IMO-8400 is an investigational oligonucleotide antagonist of endosomal TLRs 7, 8 and 9. In preclinical studies in a human cell line and animal models of WM, IMO-8400 inhibited key cell signaling pathways, including NF-κB, BTK, STAT-3 and IRAK-4, and inhibited tumor growth and tumor IgM production. In Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials in healthy subjects (N=30) and in patients with autoimmune disease (N=35), IMO-8400 was generally well tolerated and demonstrated evidence of clinical activity. Based on these data, we initiated a Phase 1/2 clinical trial of IMO-8400 in WM, the first study of a drug candidate specifically targeting the MYD88 L265P mutation. Methods: This Phase 1/2 multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation clinical trial continues to recruit adult patients with relapsed or refractory WM (NCT Identifier: NCT02092909). In a classic 3x3 dose escalation scheme, patients are enrolled in one of three sequential escalating dose cohorts and receive subcutaneous IMO-8400 at dosages of 0.6, 1.2 or 2.4 mg/kg per week, respectively, for 24 weeks. The presence of the MYD88 L265P mutation is assessed by PCR-based genetic screening following enrollment. Patients who complete the 24-week treatment period are eligible to enroll in an extension trial. The primary study objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of escalating IMO-8400 dosages. Secondary objectives include preliminary evaluation of clinical response based on international guidelines and identification of an optimal dose for further evaluation (Kimby, Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 2006). Results: Overall, 17 patients (6 female, 11 male) have been enrolled in three dose cohorts to date. Median baseline characteristics include: age 66 years, prior therapies 4 (range 1-13), serum IgM 2,225 mg/dL, serum M protein 0.96 g/dL, and B2-microglobulin 3.42 mg/L. IMO-8400 has been generally well tolerated across all dose cohorts to date, with patient exposure ranging from 2-46 weeks in the Phase 1/2 and extension trials. The most common adverse events reported to date include transient flu-like symptoms and injection site reactions. One serious adverse event of worsening grade 3 arthritis, deemed possibly related to study drug, was reported in a patient with a pre-existing history of arthritis in the 2.4 mg/kg dose cohort. This patient discontinued study treatment. To date, no other patients have discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse events. Preliminary evidence of clinical activity for IMO-8400 has been observed in all dose cohorts. In June 2015, an independent Data Review Committee reviewed 4-week safety data from the highest dose cohort and agreed that 2.4 mg/kg was safe for further evaluation. Safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary activity for all three dose cohorts will be presented. Conclusions: IMO-8400 is a mutation-targeted therapy in development for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory WM. In an ongoing Phase 1/2 clinical trial in WM, IMO-8400 has been generally well tolerated and has demonstrated preliminary evidence of clinical activity. Safety results support continued evaluation of IMO-8400 at 2.4 mg/kg/week in this patient population. Disclosures Thomas: Novartis, Celgene, Acerta Pharmaceuticals, Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Harb:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Beck:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Nashat:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Ansell:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Eradat:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Libby:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Hajdenberg:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Heffner:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Hoffman:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Vesole:Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau; Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Simov:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Wyant:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Brevard:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Employment. O'Leary:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Agrawal:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Employment.

Download Full-text

An open label, multicenter, phase I/II study of RP1 as a single agent and in combination with PD1 blockade in patients with solid tumors.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.tps2671 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. TPS2671-TPS2671

Author(s):

Mark R. Middleton ◽

Joseph J. Sacco ◽

Jaime R. Merchan ◽

Brendan D. Curti ◽

Ari M. Vanderwalde ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Phase I ◽

Solid Tumors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Objective Response ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Biomarker Analysis ◽

Tumor Types

TPS2671 Background: RP1 is an attenuated oncolytic HSV-1 that expresses a fusogenic glycoprotein from gibbon ape leukemia virus (GALV-GP R-) and GM-CSF. RP1 induces potent GALV-GP R- enhanced immunogenic cell death and host anti-tumor immunity in murine tumor models and increases PD-L1 expression. This clinical trial (NCT03767348) was designed to test the hypotheses that RP1 is safe when given alone and together with nivolumab (phase 1) and has efficacy together with nivolumab in four tumor types (phase 2). Methods: The primary goals of this clinical trial in a total of ~150 patients are to define the safety profile of RP1 alone and together with nivolumab, determine the recommended phase 2 dose (phase 1), and then in four phase 2 cohorts, to determine objective response rate in patients with melanoma, non-melanoma skin cancer, urothelial carcinoma and MSI-H solid tumors. Secondary objectives include duration of response, CR rate, PFS, viral shedding, and immune biomarker analysis. Patients with advanced cancer who failed prior therapy were eligible for the phase I component. In Phase 2 patients with histologic diagnoses of the four tumor types (N=30 for each) and who meet safety criteria for nivolumab treatment are eligible. Prior treatment with checkpoint blockade is not allowed except for the melanoma cohort. In the phase 1 portion patients are treated by intra-patient dose escalation of virus (range, 104 - 108 PFU) by intratumoral injection every two weeks for 5 total doses followed by 12 patients dosed 8 times at the RP2D in combination with nivolumab. Phase 1 patients were divided into two groups based on presence of clinically accessible lesions amenable to direct injection or those with visceral/deep lesions requiring image guidance for injection. In the phase 2 portion patients will receive the RP2D for eight injections and nivolumab will be given starting with the second RP1 injection. For the phase 1 portion, a modified 3+3 dose escalation design is used to assess safety and in the phase 2 portion, statistical analysis will be performed using a two-stage three-outcome optimum design with objective responses determined by RECIST criteria. As of February 11, 2019, 27 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03767348.

Download Full-text

Disparity in Clinical Trial Opportunities for Patients with B-Cell Malignancies in the United States

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117155 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4861-4861

Author(s):

Sikander Ailawadhi ◽

Sri Lekha Bodepudi ◽

Zan Tahir Shareef ◽

Fabiola Coromoto Cardozo ◽

Salman Ahmed ◽

...

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Clinical Trial ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Geographical Distribution ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

The United States ◽

Phase 2 ◽

B Cell Malignancies ◽

The Us

Abstract Background: Clinical trials are fundamental to advance therapeutics systematically and improve patient outcomes. Despite this, enrollment on clinical trials remains dismal in the United States (US) and is a constant focus of healthcare policy. We studied distribution of clinical trials for B-cell malignancies over time across the US and unique clinical trial opportunities i.e. individual clinical trials for the given diagnosis at a site that patients may have access to participate. Methods: We abstracted data from clinicaltrials.gov for all trials that had non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or multiple myeloma (MM) as an inclusion indication between 1999-2018. Clinical trial characteristics and distribution over US geographical divisions (West, Midwest, Northeast, and South) were studied, and differences were assessed by Chi-square test. Results: A total of 1930 trials were identified (NHL: 982, MM: 948), of which 483 were recruiting at the time of data abstraction (NHL: 250, MM: 233). Over the past 2 decades, 182691 patients were enrolled on the various trials (NHL: 81592, MM: 101099). Trials by phase of study included phase 1: 629, phase 1/2: 316, phase 2: 813, phase 2/3: 11 and phase 3: 161. Number of trials by phase separated by NHL and MM are shown in Figure 1. Of these, 197 trials were randomized (NHL: 67, MM: 130). Geographical distribution of trials by diagnosis type is shown in Figure 2. A total of 31806 unique trial opportunities were noted for MM and NHL, of which 9,513 were international and 22,293 were in the US, with a geographical distribution of 5080 in West, 8198 in Midwest, 3944 in Northeast, and 5071 in South. 4,883 of the unique trial opportunities were available at NCI/NCCN accredited sites and 17,410 were at non-NCI/NCCN sites in the US. Treatment characteristics of the trials included monoclonal antibodies in 1218, other targeted agents in 2641, stem cell transplant in 526, and other agents in 517 trials with several trials utilizing more than one of these therapeutic options. There was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of clinical trials by phase of study across various US geographical regions for MM (p=0.71), NHL (p=0.98) or combined MM+NHL (p=0.16). On the other hand, unique trial opportunities were significantly different by study phase and geographical distribution for MM, NHL or MM+NHL (all p<0.001) (Figure 3). Conclusions: Widespread access to clinical trials within a cancer diagnosis is imperative for generalizability of trial results. In a comprehensive, national analysis we noted that while it may appear that clinical trials are available across the US, sites where they are open are distributed unevenly, giving rise to a disparity in access to evidence-based therapeutic advancements for patients. Disclosures Ailawadhi: Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Sher:Affimed: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase I/II dose-escalation and expansion study of FLX475 alone and in combination with pembrolizumab in advanced cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.tps3163 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. TPS3163-TPS3163

Author(s):

John D. Powderly ◽

Bartosz Chmielowski ◽

Julie R. Brahmer ◽

Sarina Anne Piha-Paul ◽

Samantha Elizabeth Bowyer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

T Cells ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Safety Data ◽

Receptor Occupancy ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Open Label

TPS3163 Background: Regulatory T cells (Treg) can dampen anti-tumor immune responses in the tumor microenvironment (TME). The predominant chemokine receptor on human Treg is CCR4, the receptor for the chemokines CCL17 and CCL22, which are produced by tumor cells, tumor-associated macrophages and dendritic cells, as well as by effector T cells (Teff) in the setting of an inflammatory anti-tumor response. Preclinical studies with orally-available CCR4 antagonists have demonstrated potent inhibition of Treg migration into tumors, an increase in the intratumoral Teff/Treg ratio, and anti-tumor efficacy as a single agent and in combination with checkpoint inhibitors. In a first-in-human trial conducted in healthy volunteers, the oral CCR4 antagonist FLX475 was demonstrated to be well tolerated with outstanding PK properties. A robust PD assay measuring receptor occupancy on circulating Treg demonstrated the ability to safely achieve exposure levels predicted to maximally inhibit Treg recruitment into tumors via CCR4 signaling. These human PK, PD, and safety data have enabled a streamlined design of a Phase 1/2 study of FLX475 in cancer patients both as monotherapy and in combination with checkpoint inhibitor. Methods: This clinical trial is a Phase 1/2, open-label, dose-escalation and cohort expansion study to determine the safety and preliminary anti-tumor activity of FLX475 as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab. The study is being conducted in 2 parts, a dose-escalation phase (Part 1) and a cohort expansion phase (Part 2). In Part 1 (Phase 1) of the study, at least 3 to 6 eligible subjects are being enrolled in sequential cohorts treated with successively higher doses of FLX475 as monotherapy (Part 1a) or in combination with pembrolizumab (Part 1b). In Part 2 (Phase 2) of the study, expansion cohorts of both checkpoint-naïve and checkpoint-experienced patients with tumor types predicted to be enriched for Treg and/or CCR4 ligand expression (i.e. “charged tumors”) -- including both EBV+ and HPV+ tumors and NSCLC, HNSCC, and TNBC -- will be enrolled using a Simon 2-stage design. As of February 4, 2020, Phase 1 dose escalation has been completed and a recommended Phase 2 dose chosen for both FLX475 monotherapy and combination therapy with pembrolizumab. Enrollment into Phase 2 expansion cohorts has been initiated. Clinical trial information: NCT03674567 .

Download Full-text

Trial in progress: A phase 1-2 multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation and dose-expansion study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of ABN401 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.tps3157 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. TPS3157-TPS3157

Author(s):

Dae Ho Lee ◽

Aflah Roohullah ◽

Byoung Chul Cho ◽

Charlotte Rose Lemech ◽

Paul L. de Souza ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Solid Tumors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Local Therapy ◽

Tumor Type ◽

Advanced Solid Tumors ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Open Label

TPS3157 Background: c-MET (hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) receptor) overexpression, either by gene amplification, or mutation is associated with oncogenic transformation in numerous malignancies including lung, gastric, skin, renal, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. ABN401 inhibits the activation of c-MET by reversibly interfering with the binding of c-Met tyrosine kinase to adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and blocking the receptor's downstream signaling that has demonstrated efficacy in NSCLC and gastric cancer in mouse xenograft and PDx models. This clinical trial is in progress in patients with advanced cancers. Methods: ABN401 is being evaluated in an open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation (phase 1) study in patients with advanced solid tumors, and dose-expansion (phase 2) in patients with targeted indications and c-MET biomarker expression (NCT04052971). The phase 1 explores ascending daily doses of oral ABN401 monotherapy in 21-day cycles to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). A preplanned extension (pilot expansion) study has been initiated based on predefined positive efficacy signals at intermediate doses up to 10 NSCLC patients who have c-MET alteration. Once RP2D is determined, the phase 2 expansion of up to 10-29 patients in four specific tumor-type cohorts is planned, utilizing a Simon's optimal two-stage design to evaluate the clinical activity of ABN401. ABN401-001 study began enrolling patients in August 2019 and is ongoing in Korean and Australia. Dose escalation up to cohort 4 has been completed, enrollment to cohort 5 began in November 2020. AEs are assessed according to CTCAE v5. Tumor response is determined according to RECIST 1.1 criteria and safety findings reviewed by the DRC, which will determine the RP2D and MTD. Key Phase 1 eligibility criteria include 1) histological or cytological diagnosis of melanoma or any type of carcinoma or sarcoma and 2) refractory metastatic disease, or refractory locally advanced disease not amenable to local therapy. For the extension (pilot expansion) study, patients must have NSCLC with MET exon 14 skipping, MET amplification and/or c-MET overexpression. An exploratory study is being conducted for co-development of a companion diagnostic (CDx) system including a CTC device and ddPCR kit through liquid biopsy. Clinical trial information: NCT04052971.

Download Full-text

Multicenter Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed Adult T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma (ATL) or Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.2737.2737 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 2737-2737 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Naokuni Uike ◽

Michinora Ogura ◽

Yoshitaka Imaizumi ◽

Norio Asou ◽

Atae Utsunomiya ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2737 Introduction: ATL is prevalent in Japan and has the worst prognosis among T-cell malignancies. PTCL also has a poor prognosis with currently available chemotherapeutic regimens, and both would benefit from better treatment modality. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with direct tumoricidal and antiproliferative activity, and is approved for multiple myeloma (MM) in combination with dexamethasone after at least 1 prior therapy and for transfusion-dependent anemia due to low- or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes associated with 5q deletion. We conducted a phase 1 study of lenalidomide in patients with relapsed ATL or PTCL to establish the recommended dose and schedule for a subsequent phase 2 study. Patients and Methods: This multicenter, phase 1, dose-escalation study assessed the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and efficacy in patients with relapsed advanced ATL or PTCL. Dose-escalation was conducted according to the standard 3+3 design. Up to one PTCL patient was allowed to be included in each cohort of 3 patients. Patients in Cohort 1 received oral lenalidomide 25 mg daily on Days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle. Patients in Cohorts 2 and 3 received 25 and 35 mg/day, respectively, on each day of the 28-day cycle. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as febrile neutropenia lasting 5 or more days; thrombocytopenia (platelets <10,000/uL or bleeding requiring platelet transfusion); ALT/AST elevation of Grade 4 or that of Grade 3 lasting 7 or more days; and/or clinically unacceptable Grade 3 or higher other non-hematological adverse events (AEs). Treatment was continued until the development of unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease (PD). Response was assessed by internationally accepted standard criteria for ATL and PTCL. Results: From July 2010–June 2012, 13 Japanese patients (9 ATL and 4 PTCL; age 32–74 years [median, 64]; 1–11 prior therapies [median, 1]) were enrolled: 3 in Cohort 1, 6 in Cohort 2, and 4 in Cohort 3. The 3 patients in Cohort 1 received lenalidomide for 21, 103, and 637 days, respectively, until PD with no instances of DLT. In Cohort 2, 1 patient experienced DLT (thrombocytopenia, platelets <10,000/uL) and 4 patients received lenalidomide for 37, 56, 138, and 387 days, respectively, until PD in 3 patients and unrelated death in one. The sixth patient is still receiving lenalidomide for 28+ days without a DLT. In Cohort 3, 2 patients had DLTs (thrombocytopenia, platelets <10,000/uL in one patient and Grade 3 prolongation of QTc interval in one patient on concomitant fluconazole with preexisting cardiac disease and grade 1 QTc prolongation at baseline), 1 patient received lenalidomide for 71 days before withdrawal of consent, and 1 patient is still receiving lenalidomide for 323+ days without a DLT. Based on these results, 25 mg daily per 28-day cycle was regarded as the MTD. Other Grade 3/4 non-DLT AEs occurring in 2 or more patients included neutropenia (n=8), lymphocytopenia (n=7), thrombocytopenia (n=3), skin rash (n=3), hyperbilirubinemia (n=2), and increased ALT/AST (n=2). Among the 9 ATL patients, 3 achieved partial responses (PR) with hematological complete response in 2 patients, including the disappearance of skin lesions in 1 patient. These responses occurred between 54 and 57 days, and lasted for 92, 279+ and 505 days. Among the 4 PTCL patients, 1 achieved a PR at day 106 with >75% reduction in lymph nodes, which lasted for 282 days. PK profiles of patients in the study were generally consistent with that observed in Japanese MM patients. Plasma exposure of lenalidomide increased with increasing dose with a mean Cmax on Day 1 for 25 mg and 35 mg of 493 ng/mL and 628 ng/mL, respectively, and a mean AUC24 of 2774 ng/mL and 3062 ng/mL, respectively. There was no evidence of accumulation following multiple dosing for 8 days. Conclusions: This phase 1 study identified lenalidomide 25 mg daily per 28-day cycle as the dose and schedule for a subsequent phase 2 study in patients with ATL or PTCL. Based on the preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in ATL and PTCL patients, a phase 2 study in patients with relapsed ATL in Japan is planned. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Lenalidomide (CC-5013) is an investigational agent in Japan; this abstract assesses its use in adult ATL patients. Tobinai:Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Zenyaku: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Symbio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biomedics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Solasia Pharma: Clinical trials, Clinical trials Other, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Chugai/Roche: Research Funding; Takeda: Clinical trials, Clinical trials Other, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Safety Profile and Clinical Response To MEDI-551, a Humanized Monoclonal Anti-CD19, In a Phase 1/2 Study In Adults With Relapsed Or Refractory Advanced B-Cell Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1810.1810 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1810-1810 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Andres Forero-Torres ◽

Mehdi Hamadani ◽

Michelle A. Fanale ◽

Celeste M. Bello ◽

Thomas J. Kipps ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Stock Options ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Phase 2 ◽

B Cell Malignancies

Abstract Background MEDI-551 is an affinity-optimized and afucosylated humanized IgG kappa monoclonal antibody directed against CD19 and induces malignant clone destruction by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. This study evaluates the safety profile and clinical activity of MEDI-551 in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. These include chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and multiple myeloma (MM). Objectives Determine the safety profile and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MEDI-551 in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. Secondary objectives include clinical activity of MEDI-551. Methods In this phase 1/2 open-label multicenter, global dose-escalation and expansion study, patients with relapsed or refractory CLL, DLBCL, FL, or MM received MEDI-551 (at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, or 12 mg/kg) by intravenous infusion administered over 28-day cycles using standard 3+3 dose escalation. Dose escalation continued to the maximum dose ≤12 mg/kg or until MTD was reached. Therapy continued for 2 cycles beyond complete response (CR), or until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as a MEDI-551-related adverse event (AE) that prevented completion of a full first cycle of MEDI-551, or as a ≥grade 3 toxicity (excluding hematologic toxicity) that could not be ascribed to another cause. Results Of 91 patients who received ≥1 dose of MEDI-551, 25 patients (CLL [3], DLBCL [6], FL [12], MM [4]) were enrolled in the phase 1 escalation portion (Jun 2010–Aug 2011). No MTD was achieved. The phase 2 expansion phase included 66 patients (CLL [23], DLBCL [20], FL [22], MM [1]) as of 14Jul2013. Three patients were re-treated with MEDI-551 upon relapse. Median age of patients treated was 66 years; median lines of prior therapy was 6. The median number of treatment cycles was 5 with a maximum of 28 cycles. There were 14 deaths due to AEs (none were drug-related) and 15 subjects discontinued treatment. One subject each discontinued due to drug-related neutropenia and infusion reaction. Most AEs were grade 1/2 with dose-independent frequency and severity (Table). Of 91 patients, 5 (5.5%) patients had grade 4 TEAEs (2 with drug-related neutropenia) and 9 (9.9%) had grade 5 events, none were drug related. Of 19 patients with 38 serious AEs (SAE), 2 patients had 3 events that were considered drug-related; pneumonia and sepsis in 1 patient and infusion related reaction in the other. Of 83 patients in the efficacy evaluable population (includes all patients who received any treatment of MEDI-551 and completed at least 1 post-baseline disease assessment), 9 had CR, 12 had partial responses (PR) and 42 had stable disease (SD; Figure 1). ORR to single-agent MEDI-551 was 24%, 24%, or 31% respectively in heavily pre-treated patients with CLL, DLBCL, or FL. Median progression-free survival was ≈9 months (Figure 2). Conclusions MEDI-551 has an acceptable safety profile warranting further study. Anti-tumor activity was achieved in a heavily pre-treated population of DLBCL, CLL, and FL patients respectively in this single-agent study. Phase 2 studies of MEDI-551 in combination with chemotherapy in DLBCL and CLL are ongoing. Funding Source This study was sponsored by MedImmune. Disclosures: Forero-Torres: MedImmune: Research Funding. Hamadani:MedImmune: Research Funding. Fanale:MedImmune: Research Funding. Bello:MedImmune: Research Funding. Kipps:MedImmune: Research Funding. Offner:MedImmune: Research Funding. Verhoef:MedImmune: Research Funding. Federico:MedImmune: Research Funding. Gregory:MedImmune: Research Funding. Sonet:MedImmune: Research Funding. Assouline:MedImmune: Research Funding. Pérez de Oteyza:MedImmune: Research Funding. Tomas:MedImmune: Research Funding. Cuneo:MedImmune: Research Funding. Elgeioushi:MedImmune: Employment, Stock/stock options from AstraZeneca Other. Goswami:MedImmune: Employment, Stock/stock options from AstraZeneca Other. Ibrahim:MedImmune: Employment, Stock/stock options from AstraZeneca Other. Herbst:MedImmune: Employment, Stock/stock options from AstraZeneca Other. Cheson:MedImmune: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

FT-2102, an IDH1m Inhibitor, in Combination with Azacitidine in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplastic Ayndrome (MDS): Results from a Phase 1 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114126 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1452-1452 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Justin Watts ◽

Thomas Prebet ◽

Gary J. Schiller ◽

Sangmin Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Advisory Committee ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Clinical Data ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Inadequate Response ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutations (IDH1m) occur in 7-14% of AML patients and 3% of MDS patients. Mutated IDH1 metabolizes alpha-ketoglutarate into 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), an oncometabolite that impairs differentiation. FT-2102 is an oral, highly potent, selective small molecule inhibitor of mutated IDH1, with the therapeutic potential to restore normal cellular differentiation. Azacitidine (AZA), a hypomethylating agent (HMA), is a standard of care for MDS and for AML patients unfit for intensive therapy. We present Phase 1 clinical data from the ongoing Phase 1/2 study of FT-2102 in combination with azacitidine (FT-2102+AZA) in patients with IDH1m AML and MDS (CT.gov: NCT02719574). Methods: A Phase 1 study was initiated to evaluate the safety, PK/PD, and antileukemic activity of FT-2102 in patients with IDH1m AML or MDS and included both dose escalation and expansion. FT-2102 was administered daily (150 QD or 150 BID) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity; AZA was administered at 75 mg/m2 IV or SC daily for 7 days of each 28-day cycle. Eligible patients had IDH1m AML/MDS that was relapsed/refractory (R/R) or treatment-naïve (TN), were eligible for AZA therapy and had adequate liver and renal function. Prior IDH1 inhibitors and hypomethylating agents were allowed, and there were no restrictions for concomitant non-anticancer medications. Investigator-assessed responses were per modified IWG 2003/2006 criteria. Efficacy was assessed at Cycle 2 Day 1 and as clinically indicated thereafter. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed throughout the study per NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Results: At the time of the data cutoff, 07 April 2018, 27 patients had been enrolled and 26 had been treated with FT-2102+AZA, with a median of 3 months on treatment (range: 0.2 to 12 months). Of the 27 enrolled patients, 24 had AML (20 R/R; 4 TN) and 3 patients had MDS (all TN). The median number of prior antileukemia therapies was 3 (range: 0-5) in the AML patients. Doses of FT-2102 were 150 mg QD (n=7) and 150 mg BID (n=20). Thirteen (50%) patients discontinued treatment, with the most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were hematopoietic stem cell transplant (n=4), death (n=2), and progressive disease (n=2). No patients discontinued due to an AE. Severe (≥ Grade 3) AEs occurring in ≥ 5% of patients included febrile neutropenia (27%), anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis (19% each), fatigue, hypertension, neutropenia (15% each), nausea, pneumonia, hypokalemia (12% each) and abdominal pain (8%). Three patients had differentiation syndrome (IDH-DS), which resolved with FT-2102 temporary interruption, and treatment with dexamethasone, hydroxyurea, and supportive care in all three. Five patients died within 28-days of the last dose of study drug, none of which were considered related to FT-2102+AZA. No DLTs were observed during dose escalation. PK analysis demonstrated no impact of AZA on steady-state exposure of FT-2102. 2-HG levels to normal levels by C2D1. Table 1 shows the Investigator-assessed ORR per IWG. Responses have been seen as early as 1 month on treatment, and stable disease for greater than 6 months; 50% of patients remain on treatment. Conclusions: FT-2102+AZA is well tolerated in AML and MDS, with 150 mg BID selected as the RP2D based on safety, PK and PD (2-HG) response. Clinical activity has been observed, with an ORR of 42%. Durable CRs (>12 months) have been observed. The current data support the continued evaluation of FT-2102 150 mg BID+AZA in the Phase 2 study. Three Phase 2 combination therapy cohorts are currently open for enrollment in patients < 60 years with R/R AML or MDS naïve to HMA and IDH1m inhibitors; R/R AML or MDS with inadequate response/PD on HMA, and R/R AML or MDS who have progressed on a prior IDH1m inhibitor. Updated clinical data will be available at the time of presentation. Disclosures Cortes: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Schiller:Celator/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Lee:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Clinipace: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy. Wang:Amgen: Consultancy; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ferrell:Incyte: Research Funding. Jonas:LP Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Kalobios: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; Accelerated Medical Diagnostics: Research Funding; Tolero: Consultancy; Esanex: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Wei:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding. Montesinos:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Kelly:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Li:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Sweeney:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Watson:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Mohamed:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 Study of the IDH1m Inhibitor FT-2102 As a Single Agent in Patients with IDH1m Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114263 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1453-1453 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Justin Watts ◽

Maria R. Baer ◽

Jay Yang ◽

Shira Dinner ◽

Sangmin Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Dose Escalation ◽

Human Tissue ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutations (IDH1m) occur in 7-14% of AML patients and 3% of MDS patients and produce 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), an oncometabolite that impairs differentiation. FT-2102 is an oral, highly potent, selective small molecule inhibitor of mutated IDH1, with the therapeutic potential to restore normal cellular differentiation. Herein, we present preclinical and clinical data from an ongoing Phase 1/2 study of single-agent (SA) FT-2102 in patients with IDH1m AML and MDS (CT.gov: NCT02719574). Methods: Extensive pre-clinical evaluations were performed on FT-2102, including CYP interactions in-vivo in rat and in-vitro in human tissue and in-vivo QTc toxicology in monkeys. The clinical Phase 1 study was initiated to evaluate the safety, PK/PD, and antileukemic activity of FT-2102 in patients with IDH1m AML or MDS and included both dose escalation and expansion phases. FT-2102 was administered daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Eligibility criteria included: IDH1m AML/MDS [relapsed/refractory (R/R) or treatment naïve (TN) for whom standard therapy was contraindicated], adequate liver and renal function, no prior IDH1 inhibitors, and no restrictions for concomitant non-anticancer medications. Investigator-assessed responses were per modified IWG 2003/2006 criteria. Efficacy was assessed at Cycle 2 Day 1 and as clinically indicated thereafter. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed throughout the study per NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Results: Evaluation of FT-2102 in in-vivo rat and in-vitro human tissue indicated hepatic metabolism by CYP enzymes (CPY3A4, 2C9, 1A1) as the major route of excretion. Animal toxicology studies predicted the threshold for QTc risk occurred at exposures >5.5 fold higher than the murine exposure at which 90% 2-HG reduction was observed. In the clinical study, at the time of the data cutoff, 31 patients (pts) had been treated with SA FT-2102, with a median of 3 mo. on treatment (range: 0.2 to 20 mo.). Of the 31pts treated, 25 had AML (22 R/R; 3 TN) and 6 had MDS (4 R/R; 2 TN). The median number of prior anti-leukemia therapies was 2 (range: 0-9) for AML pts and 1 (range: 0-4) for MDS pts. FT-2102 doses were: 150 mg QD (n=8), 300 mg QD (n=4), 150 mg BID (n=16), and 100 mg QD with food (n=3). Eighteen pts discontinued treatment, most commonly due to death (n=5), progressive disease (n=5), HSCT (n=3), or lack of response (n=3). Severe (≥Grade 3) AEs occurring in >5% of pts included thrombocytopenia (26%), febrile neutropenia (23%), anemia (19%), pneumonia (13%), neutropenia (7%), hypokalemia (7%), pyrexia (7%) and leukocytosis (6%). Three pts had differentiation syndrome (IDH-DS), which resolved with temporary interruption of FT-2102, treatment with dexamethasone, hydroxyurea, and supportive care in all three. One pt had transient QTcF prolongation (Grade 3) which resolved with temporary interruption of FT-2102 and cessation of suspected concomitant medications. Eight pts died on treatment or within 28 days of the last dose, with no deaths considered related to FT-2102. No DLTs were observed during dose escalation. Selection of FT-2102 150 mg BID as the RP2D was supported by PK and PD data. Durable steady-state (Css) achieved by Week 2 was well below the threshold for QTc risk predicted by preclinical studies. The predicted IC90 was confirmed with prompt and durable 2-HG reduction to normal levels by C2D1 at the RP2D. Table 1 shows the Investigator-assessed ORR per IWG. Responses have been observed from 1 to 6 months on treatment, with stable disease observed beyond 6 months; 42% of the patients remain on treatment. Conclusions: FT-2102 preclinical evaluations suggest a low risk of clinically significant CYP-mediated drug-drug interaction and QTc prolongation. SA FT-2102 is well tolerated in AML and MDS, with 150 mg BID selected as the RP2D based on safety, PK and PD (2-HG) response. Significant clinical activity has been observed in heavily pre-treated and in TN patients, both in AML and MDS. FT-2102 continues being investigated at a dose of 150 mg BID in a Phase 2 study. Three SA Phase 2 cohorts are currently open for enrollment in R/R AML, AML/MDS with CR/CRi (i.e., with MRD), and in pts with R/R MDS/AML with prior exposure to an IDH1m inhibitor. Data updates will be available at the time of presentation. Disclosures Lee: LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Clinipace: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Schiller:Celator/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Ferrell:Incyte: Research Funding. Kelly:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Li:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Sweeney:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Watson:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Mohamed:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Cortes:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding.

Download Full-text