scholarly journals Factors Associated with High Healthcare Utilization at the End-of-Life (EOL) for Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 24-25
Author(s):  
Dagny M. Vaughn ◽  
P. Connor Johnson ◽  
Annemarie D. Jagielo ◽  
Matthew J. Reynolds ◽  
Alison R. Kavanaugh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Healthcare Utilization ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Depression Symptoms ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Eol Care

INTRODUCTION: High rates of healthcare utilization at the EOL have been shown to negatively impact patients' quality-of-life (QOL), psychological distress, and caregivers' bereavement outcomes. Older patients (> 60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) often experience high healthcare utilization at the EOL, including hospitalizations and chemotherapy close to death. Yet, factors associated with healthcare utilization at the EOL in this population are unknown. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of two supportive care studies including 168 deceased older patients with AML. We assessed patients' demographics, QOL [Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy-Leukemia], and psychological distress [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)] at diagnosis. We used multivariate logistic regression models to examine the associations between demographic factors, patient-reported outcomes, and the following EOL care outcomes abstracted from the electronic health record: 1) hospitalizations in the last 7 days of life; 2) receipt of chemotherapy in the last 30 days of life; and 3) hospice utilization. RESULTS: The median age of the cohort was 67 (range 20-100), and the majority identified as male (63.7% - 107/168) and white (88.1% - 148/168). Overall, 66.7% (110/165) of patients were hospitalized in the last 7 days of life, 51.8% (71/137) received chemotherapy in the last 30 days of life, 59.5% (100/168) died in the hospital, while 40.7% (70/168) utilized hospice services. In multivariate models, higher education (OR = 1.54, SE=0.24, P=0.006), and elevated depression symptoms (PHQ-9: OR=1.09, SE=0.04, P=0.028) at the time of diagnosis were associated with higher odds of being hospitalized in the last 7 days of life. In contrast, higher QOL at diagnosis (OR=0.98, SE=0.01, P=0.009) was associated with lower odds of being hospitalized in the last 7 days of life. Depression symptoms at the time of diagnosis as measured by the HADS was the only factor associated with the receipt of chemotherapy in the last 30 days of life (HADS-Depression: OR=1.10, SE=0.05, P=0.042). Patient-reported factors, including demographics, QOL, and psychological distress, were not associated with hospice utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with AML who reported higher levels of education, elevated depression symptoms, and lower QOL at the time of diagnosis were more likely to experience intense healthcare utilization at the EOL. These findings identify an AML population who are at higher risk for hospitalizations and additional chemotherapy at the EOL, and who may benefit from targeted interventions to optimize their EOL care. Disclosures Fathi: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; NewLink Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; TrovaGene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amphivena: Consultancy, Honoraria; Forty Seven: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Blue Print Oncology: Consultancy. Hobbs:Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Constellation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Brunner:Janssen: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Xcenda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy; Forty Seven, Inc: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biogen: Consultancy; Acceleron Pharma Inc.: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding. Luger:Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Hoffman La Roche: Research Funding; Acceleron: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Ariad: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Biosight: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Onconova: Research Funding. Bhatnagar:KaryoPharm Therapuetics: Research Funding; Cell Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. LeBlanc:UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; American Cancer Society, BMS, Duke University, NINR/NIH, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; AbbVie, Agios, Amgen, AstraZeneca, CareVive, BMS/Celgene, Daiichi-Sankyo, Flatiron, Helsinn, Heron, Otsuka, Medtronic, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Welvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios, AbbVie, and Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Patient Characteristics and Outcomes in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Experience

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2609-2609
Author(s):  
Muhned Alhumaid ◽  
Georgina S Daher-Reyes ◽  
Wilson Lam ◽  
Arjun Law ◽  
Tracy Murphy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Disease Behavior

Introduction: Clinical outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adolescents and young adults (AYA) are rarely reported as an isolated subgroup. Treatments vary little across age groups, and treatment intensity depends upon comorbid conditions and performance status. Optimal treatment strategies focused on disease behavior, biological factors, and the distinct needs of this subset of AML patients remain elusive. The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to determine the characteristics and outcomes of AYA AML patients treated at a specialized adult leukemia cancer center in comparison to older adults with AML (40-60 years). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients treated at Princess Margaret Cancer Center from 2008-2018. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded. Clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and survival outcomes were recorded for all patients. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and the impact of covariates were assessed using the Log-rank test. Finally, we compared the outcomes of AYA patients treated at our centre between 2015-2018 with older patients. Results: A total of 175 patients aged 18-39 were identified. Patient characteristics are shown in (Table 1). Cytogenetic were available in 163 patients. Based on MRC criteria, 27 (16%) were favorable risk, intermediate in 95 (54%), adverse in 39 (22%), and missing/failed in 14(8%). NPM1 status was available in 110 patients of whom 38 (35%) were positive. FLT3-ITD was available in 67 patients with 24 (36%) positive. Both mutations were present in 13 (54%) patients. There were no significant differences in terms of risk stratification based on cytogenetic and molecular markers based on age (18-29 vs.30-39) (P= 0.98). Most patients 172 (98%) received induction, 157 (91%) with 3+7, and 15 (9%) with FLAG-IDA. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 133 (77%) after first induction [120 (76%) after 3+7 and 11 (73%) after FLAG-IDA]. Induction related mortality was low (2%). Of the 39 who did not achieve CR, thirty-four patients received re-induction (13 FLAG-IDA, 16 NOVE-HiDAC, 5 others) with CR in 21 (62%). Overall, 154 (89.5%) achieved CR1. Sixty-four (42%) proceeded to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in CR1. 59 (38%) patients relapsed in CR1 with 8 (12%) relapsing post HSCT. Fifty-five (5 post HSCT) patients received reinduction with 30 (51%) (2 after HSCT) achieving CR2. Fifteen patients received HSCT in CR2. OS and DFS at 2 years were 62% (95% CI 0.53-0.69) and 50% (95% CI 0.41-0.57), respectively. Stratified by cytogenetic risk, OS was 81% for favorable risk, 61% for intermediate, and 50% for adverse risk (P=0.0001), respectively. DFS in these groups was 85%, 57%, and 46 % (P=0.0025), respectively. We further compared outcomes in the 18-29y and 30-39y age groups. The OS was 61.9% compared to 62.5% (P=0.91) and DFS of 52.1% compared to 47% (P=0.65) respectively. On univariate analysis for OS and DFS, cytogenetic risk stratification was the only significant variable (P=0.0004 and P=0.0042). We then compared the outcomes 67 sequential patients aged I8-39 treated from 2014-2018, with those of 176 sequential patients aged 40-60 treated during the same period (table 2). OS at 2 years was not statistically higher in the younger group compared to the older group (66.7% vs. 61.2%, P=0.372). While relapse rate was lower in older patients (15.5% vs. 22.6%, P=0.093), NRM was higher in older patients (29.7% vs. 18.8%,P=0.094). Conclusion: AYA pts. occupy a unique niche amongst AML as a whole. While treatment responses have improved in general, there may be potential for further gains in these patients. Increased tolerance for more intense treatment strategies as well as the incorporation of novel agents into standard treatment protocols may provide a means to optimize care in AYA patients. Finally, research is needed to elucidate biological mechanisms and predictors of disease behavior instead of arbitrary, age-stratified treatment schema. Disclosures McNamara: Novartis Pharmaceutical Canada Inc.: Consultancy. Schimmer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Medivir Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Schuh:Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva Canada Innovation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maze:Pfizer Inc: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yee:Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hoffman La Roche: Research Funding. Minden:Trillium Therapetuics: Other: licensing agreement. Gupta:Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Psychological Distress in Young Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Induction Chemotherapy

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 17-18
Author(s):  
Bethany Lockwood ◽  
Areej El-Jawahri ◽  
Alison R. Walker ◽  
Deborah Russell ◽  
Jillian Gustin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Ptsd Symptoms ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Clinically Significant

Introduction: Young adults (YAs), ages 18-39 years diagnosed with cancer have distinct physical, developmental, and psychosocial needs that are often unmet during oncologic treatment. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a disease affecting both younger and older adults, patients navigate several treatment intensity choices, and with intensive induction chemotherapy are often balancing a chance of cure with a risk of death. Furthermore, YAs with AML can have marked life disruptions with this unpredictable illness trajectory and prolonged induction hospitalization, further conflicting with normal development at this stage. Fundamentally different than solid tumors, we lack an understanding of the YA experience in AML induction compared to their older counterparts. This study explores patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including quality of life (QOL) and physical and psychological symptom burden among YAs undergoing induction chemotherapy. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of 160 patients with high-risk AML hospitalized to receive intensive chemotherapy who were enrolled in a randomized control trial of palliative care (PC) intervention versus standard oncology care. Patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory AML receiving intensive treatment requiring a 4-6 week hospitalization were enrolled in the study. We used the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu), the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist to assess QOL, symptom burden, and psychological distress respectively. Assessments were administered at baseline, week-2, and week-4 following initiation of chemotherapy. We used descriptive statistics to compare PROs at baseline between YAs (< 40 years) and older adults. We used linear regression models controlling for PC intervention effect when examining the association between age (YAs versus older adults) and PROs at week-2. We used linear mixed effect models controlling for randomization to the PC intervention to assess the association between age and PROs longitudinally throughout the hospitalization. Results: Of the 160 patients with high-risk AML enrolled in this study, 14 (8.8%) were YAs < 40 years. Demographic characteristics highlight that the majority of YAs had relapsed AML (n=10, 71.4%) and there was a greater presence of racial and ethnic diversity compared to older adults. The baseline mean QOL score for YAs was 110.5 (SD 34.2). Overall, 57.1% (8/14) reported clinically significant anxiety and 50% (7/14) reported clinically significant PTSD symptoms at baseline. Fewer YA patients, 21.4% (3/14) reported clinically significant depression. Evaluation of PROs at week-2 nadir adjusted for randomization to the PC intervention, highlighted a significant lower QOL (β=-18.27; p=0.036), higher anxiety (β=2.72; p=0.048), and higher PTSD symptoms (β=10.34; p=0.007) for YAs compared to older adults. Longitudinal analyses exploring the impact of age on PROs across induction hospitalization demonstrated that YAs had consistently significant higher anxiety (β=3.66; p=0.024) and PTSD symptoms (β=15.64; p<0.001) compared to older adults [Figure 1]. Conclusions: For YAs with AML undergoing induction chemotherapy, anxiety and PTSD symptoms are highly prevalent both at baseline and longitudinally throughout the induction hospitalization. This demonstrates a continued unmet need of the significant psychological distress and intensified hospitalization experience for YAs compared to their older counterparts. Given that distress during induction hospitalization can be predictive of post-treatment outcomes, it is imperative to tailor integrated supportive care and psychosocial interventions for YAs with AML during induction chemotherapy. Disclosures Walker: Geron: Research Funding; Newave Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Bhatnagar:KaryoPharm Therapuetics: Research Funding; Cell Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Hypomethylating Agent and Venetoclax Combination Therapy Yields Superior Outcomes When Compared to Hypomethylating Agent Monotherapy in Patients ≥70 Years with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1368-1368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yumeng Zhang ◽  
Hannah H Asghari ◽  
Onyee Chan ◽  
Dasom Lee ◽  
Martine Extermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Response Data

Background: Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have inferior outcomes when compared to younger patients. Hypomethylating agents (HMA) were established as the standard of care for patients who are unfit for intensive induction chemotherapy until HMA and venetoclax (HMA+ven) combination approval by the FDA in December 2018. Approval of HMA+ven was based on an early phase study which produced high response rates; however, the combination was not compared head-to-head with HMA alone. A randomized phase 3 study is currently underway. There is no data available comparing HMA+ven to HMA monotherapy in older patients (age ≥70 years), thus we aimed to characterize responses in older patients when treated with these two regimens. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and molecular data on 225 patients at Moffitt Cancer Center and Memorial Health System with newly diagnosed AML who were ≥ 70 years old and were treated with HMA monotherapy or HMA+ven combination. Clinical data was abstracted in accordance with institutional review board approved protocol. Patients were then divided in two subgroups: Cohort A) HMA monotherapy and B) HMA+ven combination. We calculated overall response rates (ORR) defined as patients achieving complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) or morphologic leukemia free state (MLFS). Fisher's Exact method was utilized to determine significance for categorical variables. All reported p-values are two sided. Next generation sequencing (NGS) results were analyzed using the TruSight Myeloid-54 gene panel with a sensitivity of 5%, and were characterized in patients treated in cohort B. Results: Among the 225 patients, 87% (n=196) were in cohort A and 13% (n=29) in cohort B. In cohort A, 36.7% were females compared to 27.6% in cohort B. Median age in both cohorts was 76 years (range: 70-90 years in cohort A) (range: 72-86 years in cohort B). Overall, 26% of the patients had adverse risk disease as defined by European Leukemia Net (ELN) classification in cohort A and 51.7% in cohort B. Baseline characteristics are described in Table 1. Overall response rate (ORR) of the entire cohort was 43.6% (n=92) (Table 2). ORR in cohort A was 25.5% (n=47) compared to 66.7% (n=18) in cohort B (p<0.001). The median time to response in cohort A was 3.8 mos and was 1.9 mos in cohort B. Looking only at the 66 patients with ELN-defined adverse risk, response data were available in 62 patients, and the ORR in both cohorts was 25.8% (n=16), and was significantly lower in cohort A compared to B (14.9% vs. 60%, respectively, p=0.001) (Figure 1). Among the 136 patients with favorable or intermediate risk disease, response data were available in 127 patients, and the ORR was 35.4% (n=45). In cohort A the ORR in favorable/intermediate patients was 28.9% (n=37), and in cohort B it was significantly higher at 100% (n=8) (p<0.001). Ten responding patients in cohort B had NGS data available at diagnosis and at the time of best response. Mutations cleared from the bone marrow in 60% (n=6) of these patients. With a median follow up of 11.7 months, the median overall survival (mOS) of the entire cohort was 15.03 months. The median follow-up time in cohort A is 46 months and in cohort B is 5.4 months, making assessment of relapse free survival or overall survival in cohort B premature. Early mortality rate was not different between the two cohorts (1.5% vs 3.4%, p=0.42). Conclusion: Our data provides convincing support that HMA+ven combination yields significantly higher response rates when compared to HMA monotherapy in newly diagnosed AML patients ≥70 years of age; an observation that is further strengthened by the short duration of follow-up in the HMA+Ven cohort. Responses are particularly striking in favorable and intermediate risk patients when treated with HMA+Ven. Overall our data supports the use of HMA+ven in the upfront setting for older patients with newly diagnosed AML. Additional follow-up in HMA+ven arm is needed to evaluate survival outcomes. Disclosures Kuykendall: Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria. List:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lancet:Agios, Biopath, Biosight, Boehringer Inglheim, Celator, Celgene, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm, Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: fees for non-CME/CE services . Komrokji:JAZZ: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; DSI: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy. Sallman:Celyad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Talati:Celgene: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria. Sweet:Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Effect of Age on Outcomes of Allogeneic Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3933-3933
Author(s):  
Audrey M. Sigmund ◽  
Justin Jiang ◽  
Qiuhong Zhao ◽  
Patrick Elder ◽  
Ashley E. Rosko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) has become an increasingly important consolidation treatment option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and as upfront therapy for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Although the median age at diagnosis for both diseases is above 65 years, studies evaluating allo-SCT as treatment option for patients aged 65 years or older are limited. Further, as the population ages, the number of patients above 65 years considered for allo-SCT will continue to rise. Thus, the aim of our current investigation was to analyze outcomes based on age in AML/MDS patients <65 years old and ≥65 years old who received allo-SCT at the Ohio State University. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for all AML/MDS patients who received allo-SCT between January 1984 and December 2018 at our institution. Primary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PFS was counted from the day of transplantation to relapse or death. OS was defined as survival from the day of allo-SCT until death from any cause, with censoring of patients known to be alive at the time of last follow-up. PFS and OS were calculated using Kaplan Meier Curves. Secondary endpoints included cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Cumulative incidence rates of aGVHD, cGVHD, relapse, NRM were estimated and compared using Gray's test accounting for competing risks. Results: The cohort consisted of 900 AML/MDS patients, with 150 patients ≥65 years and 750 patients <65 years. The median age at transplant for the <65 years group was 49 years (range: 18-64 years) and 68 years (range: 65-76 years) for the ≥65 years group. Gender, race, Karnofsky score, and comorbidity index were similar between the two groups. A higher proportion of patients received myeloablative (MA) conditioning (65.1%) in the <65 years of age compared to 20% in the ≥65 years of age (p<0.01). A higher proportion of older patients had matched unrelated donors (57.3%), and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens (80%). The median time from diagnosis to transplantation was 176 days (range: 55-4920) for age <65 years and 168 days (range: 34-6079 days) for age ≥65 years. Median follow-up from allo-SCT was 5.9 years (range 0.8-35.9 years) and 3.4 years (range: 1.0-9.6 years) from transplantation among survivors. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment were similar among the groups (p=0.35; 0.11). 3 year OS of 42.3% (95% CI: 38.7-45.8%) and PFS of 38.3% (95% CI: 34.8%-41.9%) were observed for age <65 years. The corresponding OS and PFS for age ≥65 years was 46.3% (95% CI: 37.9%-54.3%) and 43.0% (95% CI: 34.7%-51.0%), respectively (Figure 1a & 1b). Cumulative incidences of relapse at 1 year in <65 and ≥65 years were 26.4% and 25.3%, respectively (p=0.43). The cumulative incidence of NRM at 1 year in <65 and ≥65 years was 23.2% and 17.3%, respectively (p=0.12; Figures 1c and d). The incidences of acute and chronic GVHD were similar in the two age groups. The cumulative incidence of aGVHD at day 100 in <65 and ≥65 years was 40.3% (95% CI: 36.4%-44.2%) and 43.0% (95% CI: 34.9%-50.7%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of cGVHD at day 365 in <65 and ≥65 years was 40.8% (95% CI: 36.9%-44.6%) and 41.6% (95% CI: 33.6%-49.4%), respectively. Conclusion: Overall, our study suggests similar outcomes for elderly patients undergoing allo-HCT as compared to their counterparts, which is in line with prior studies. This likely is due to advancements in the transplant field, including the development of RIC and alternative donors, which have allowed greater access to transplant for older adults. Utilization of allo-HCT is feasible and should be considered for AML/MDS patients ≥65 years. Further research is underway to evaluate the important determinants of health status in older patients undergoing allo-HCT and to ultimately help predict NRM (BMT CTN 1704). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bumma: Amgen, Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Janssen, Oncopeptides, Sanofi: Consultancy. Vasu: Seattle Genetics: Other: travel support; Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Kiadis, Inc.: Research Funding; Omeros, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jaglowski: Takeda: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mims: Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Consultancy; Glycomemetics: Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Daiichi-Saynko: Consultancy. Brammer: Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Kymera Therapeutics: Consultancy. Saad: Incyte Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; careDx: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Kadmon: Research Funding; OrcaBio: Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy. de Lima: Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Outcome Results from the U.S. Life after Stopping TKIs (LAST) Study in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 705-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn E Flynn ◽  
Kevin P. Weinfurt ◽  
Li Lin ◽  
Jerald P. Radich ◽  
Charles A. Schiffer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Sleep Disturbance ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Withdrawal Syndrome ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Tki Discontinuation

Background: Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) offers significant improvements over previous treatments in terms of survival and toxicity yet has been associated with reduced health-related quality of life and very high cost. Discontinuing TKIs with regular monitoring is safe, but little is known about the impact of discontinuation on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In the largest U.S. study to date, we evaluated molecular recurrence of CML and PROs after TKI discontinuation. Methods: The Life After Stopping TKIs (LAST) study was a prospective single-group longitudinal study. Key inclusion criteria were age > 18 years, patient on TKI therapy (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or bosutinib) for > 3 years with documented BCR-ABL < 0.01% by PCR for > 2 years, and no previous TKI resistance. We monitored disease outcome (PCRs by central lab) and PROs (PROMIS computerized adaptive tests via REDCap) monthly for the first 6 months, every 2 months until 24 months, then every 3 months until 36 months. Molecular recurrence was defined as > 0.1% BCR-ABL IS by central lab (loss of major molecular response [MMR]). We considered 3 points to be clinically meaningful and hypothesized that by 6 months after TKI discontinuation, fatigue, depression, sleep disturbance, and diarrhea would improve by at least 3 points each, corresponding to a standardized effect size of 0.3. Given reports of a withdrawal syndrome of musculoskeletal pain in some patients after discontinuation, pain was an additional outcome of particular interest. For each PRO domain, we estimated a polynomial piecewise linear mixed effects model that specified one nonlinear trajectory after TKI discontinuation and, for those with molecular recurrence, another trajectory after TKI restart. The models included patient-level random effects for the intercepts and linear slopes. Results: From 12/2014 to 12/2016, 172 patients enrolled from 14 U.S. sites. Median age was 60 years (range 21-86) and 89 (52%) were female. The median time on TKI prior to enrollment was 81 months (IQR 54-123). With a minimum follow-up of 24 months, 107 (62%) patients remained in a treatment free remission (TFR). Reasons for restarting therapy were: loss of MMR by central (n=56) or local (n=2) lab, patient decision (n=4), and withdrawal syndrome (n=3). Missing PRO data was minimal (< 5%) with > 2000 assessments completed. For patients in TFR at 6 months, the average estimated improvement in fatigue was 2.6 points (95% CI 2.5-2.7), depression was 1.9 points (95% CI 1.8-1.9), sleep disturbance was 0.9 points (95% CI 0.8-1.0), and diarrhea was 2.7 points (95% CI 2.6-2.7). The average estimated worsening in pain interference (i.e., the extent to which pain affects daily life) was 0.4 points (95% CI 0.3-0.5). The figure shows the distribution of estimated change for each domain at 6 months. All patients showed improvements in depression, diarrhea, and fatigue. About 1 in 6 patients (17%) experienced a clinically meaningful (i.e., at least 3 points) improvement in fatigue and/or diarrhea at 6 months. Conclusion: The LAST study is the largest US TKI discontinuation study to date, and the first to include comprehensive PRO measurement. For patients in TFR at 6 months, TKI discontinuation conferred modest benefits in fatigue and diarrhea on average, with a negligible increase in pain interference. Some patients experienced more notable improvements in fatigue and diarrhea. Planned secondary analyses will include change over time up to 3 years and evaluation of additional PRO domains, including anxiety, physical function, social function, and sexual function. Our results provide important new evidence to support shared patient-provider clinical decision making regarding TKI discontinuation for patients with CML. Figure. Disclosures Radich: Novartis: Other: RNA Sequencing; TwinStrand Biosciences: Research Funding. Mauro:Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Pinilla Ibarz:Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Teva: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Larson:Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Contracts for clinical trials; Agios: Consultancy. Oehler:Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; NCCN: Consultancy; Pfizer Inc.: Research Funding. Deininger:Humana: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Blueprint: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; TRM: Consultancy; Sangoma: Consultancy; Fusion Pharma: Consultancy; Adelphi: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Sangamo: Consultancy. Shah:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Ritchie:Tolero: Other: Advisory board; Celgene: Other: Advisory board; Celgene, Novartis: Other: travel support; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer: Consultancy; AStella, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, NS Pharma, Pfizer: Research Funding; Ariad, Celgene, Incyte, Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Other: Advisory board; Pfizer: Other: Advisory board, travel support; agios: Other: Advisory board. Silver:PharmEssentia: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cortes:Sun Pharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BiolineRx: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biopath Holdings: Consultancy, Honoraria; Immunogen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merus: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Atallah:Jazz: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Phase I Trial of Targeted Alpha-Particle Immunotherapy with Actinium-225 (225Ac)-Lintuzumab (Anti-CD33) and Low-Dose Cytarabine (LDAC) in Older Patients with Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3794-3794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph G. Jurcic ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
John M. Pagel ◽  
Jae H. Park ◽  
B. Douglas Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background: The use of short-ranged (50-80 µm), high-energy (~100 keV/µm) α particle-emitting isotopes for radioimmunotherapy may result in more specific tumor cell kill and less damage to normal tissues than β-emitters. 225Ac-lintuzumab consists of a radiometal that emits four α-particles linked to an anti-CD33 antibody. A phase I trial showed that 225Ac-lintuzumab is safe at doses ≤ 3 µCi/kg and has anti-tumor activity against relapsed/refractory AML across all dose levels studied (Jurcic et al. ASH, 2011). We are conducting a multicenter, phase I dose-escalation trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity, and biological activity of fractionated-dose 225Ac-lintuzumab in combination with LDAC. Patients and Methods: Patients ≥ 60 years with untreated AML not suitable for standard induction chemotherapy (e.g., antecedent hematologic disorder, unfavorable cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities, and significant comorbidities) were eligible. Patients received LDAC 20 mg twice daily for 10 days every 4-6 weeks for up to 12 cycles. During Cycle 1, two fractions of 225Ac-lintuzumab were given one week apart, beginning 4-7 days following completion of LDAC. To prevent radiation-induced nephrotoxicity, patients were given furosemide while receiving 225Ac-lintuzumab and spironolactone for one year afterward. 225Ac doses were escalated using a 3+3 design. Four dose levels were studied with a total accrual of up to 24 patients. In planned analyses, dose escalation proceeded if < 33% of patients in a cohort experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Results: Fourteen patients (median age, 77 years; range, 68-87 years) completed therapy. An additional patient received only one of two planned fractions of 225Ac-lintuzumab due to technical issues and is excluded from analysis. Nine (64%) had prior myelodysplastic syndrome, for which seven received prior therapy with hypomethylating agents (n=6) or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (n=1). One patient (7%) had chronic myeloid leukemia in molecular remission prior to development of AML. Nine patients (64%) had intermediate-risk and five (36%) had unfavorable cytogenetics. Median CD33 expression was 81% (range, 45-100%). 225Ac-lintuzumab was given at 0.5 (n=3), 1 (n=6), 1.5 (n=3), or 2 (n=2) μCi/kg/fraction. Up to 4 cycles of LDAC were administered. DLT was seen in one patient at 1 µCi/kg/fraction who had grade 4 thrombocytopenia with marrow aplasia for more than 6 weeks following therapy. Hematologic toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia (n=4) and thrombocytopenia (n=6). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities included febrile neutropenia (n=7), pneumonia (n=4), bacteremia (n=1), cellulitis (n=1), transient creatinine increase (n=1), hypokalemia (n=1), rectal hemorrhage (n=1), and generalized weakness (n=2). Eight of 11 patients (73%) evaluated after Cycle 1 had bone marrow blast reductions (mean reduction, 72%; range, 34-100%). Seven (64%) had blast reductions of at least 50%. Objective responses (1 CR, 1 CRp, 2 CRi) were seen in four of the 14 patients (29%) after one cycle of therapy (Table 1). Responses were seen only at doses ≥ 1 µCi/kg/fraction (4 of 11 patients, 36%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.7 months (range, 1.7-16.9 months). Median overall survival (OS) was 5.5 months (range, 2.2-24 months). Conclusions: Fractionated-dose 225Ac-linutuzmab can be safely combined with LDAC and produce remission in older patients with untreated AML. Dose escalation continues to define the MTD. Additional patients will be treated at the MTD in the phase II portion of this trial to determine response rate, PFS, and OS. Table 1. Objective Responses Response Dose Level (μCi/kg/fraction) Total (n=14) 0.5 (n=3) 1 (n=6) 1.5 (n=3) 2 (n=2) CR 0 0 1 (33%) 0 1 (7%) CRp 0 0 0 1 (50%) 1 (7%) CRi 0 1 (17%) 1 (33%) 0 2 (14%) Overall Response 0 1 (17%) 2 (67%) 1 (50%) 4 (29%) Abbreviations: CR, complete remission; CRp, CR with incomplete platelet recovery; CRi, CR with incomplete count recovery. Disclosures Jurcic: Ambit Biosciences: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma US, Invc.: Research Funding; Tetralogic Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy; Bayer Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Merck and Co.: Consultancy; Celgene Corp.: Research Funding; Actrinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Ac-225-lintuzumab is an investigational agent being developed for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.. Pagel:Actinium Pharmacetuicals, Inc.: Equity Ownership. Park:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy. Levy:Takeda: Consultancy. Perl:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Earle:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Cicic:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Scheinberg:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties.

High Expression of ARMCX1 Predicts Poor Survival in Intensively Treated Older Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients (≥ 60 years)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2840-2840
Author(s):  
Jan-Henrik Mikesch ◽  
Christina Sauerland ◽  
Tobias Herold ◽  
Dennis Görlich ◽  
Eike Bormann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
High Expression ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Expression Levels ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract The Armadillo repeat-containing X-linked protein 1 (ARMCX1)gene encodes a member of the ALEX family of proteins and is located on the X chromosome. We found this gene aberrantly expressed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells. We analyzed ARMCX1 expression in a cohort of 508 AML patients who received intensive chemotherapy within AMLCG clinical trial. Expression levels of ARMCX1 were determined in pretreatment bone marrow or peripheral blood samples by using oligonucleotide microarrays (GSE37642). High transcript levels (dichotomized at the median expression) of ARMCX1 were predictors for inferior overall survival (OS) (p=0.0027, Log-Rank test) and a lower rate of complete remission (CR) (p=0.0017). Older patients (≥ 60 years) showed an elevated incidence of high ARMCX1 expression compared to younger patients (<60 years) (56% vs. 44%, p=0.008, Chi-Squared test). In the subgroup analyses we found that for younger AML patients (<60 years) ARMCX1 expression was not predictive for survival (OS, PFS, EFS) and CR. However, in older patients (≥ 60 years) OS (p=0.002, median survival 11 vs 8 months), event free survival (EFS) (p=0.0006, median 6 vs 2 months) and progression free survival (PFS) (p=0.013, median 10 vs 7 months) were significantly lower among patients with high ARMCX1 expression. CR rate of elderly AML patients with low ARMCX1 expression levels was 60% vs. 41% with high levels (P=0.003). Older AML patients with low ARMCX1 expression had a 5-year OS of 20% (vs. 7% for patients with high expression). Furthermore, prognostic significance of high ARMCX1 expression was confirmed in an independent AML patient cohort of 293 AML patients from the HOVON group (GSE6891). Both, OS (p<0.001) and EFS (p<0.001) were significantly inferior for patients with high ARMCX1expression in this cohort. Multivariate logistic regression did not show any association between ARMCX1 expression and sex, lactatdehydrogenase (LDH) or leukocyte count (WBC). Interestingly, high expression of ARMCX1 was strongly associated with high United Kingdom Medical Research Council (MRC) risk classification (p<0.0001). Evaluation of ARMCX1 expression against a clinical multivariate Cox-Regression model (age, gender) showed that dichotomized ARMCX1 added a significant amount of information to the model and was a risk factor for OS (p=0.0020, HR= 1.377 (95%-CI 1.124, 1.686)). Strikingly, including MRC risk classification into the multivariate Cox-Regression model high ARMCX1 expression remained a significant risk factor for OS (p=0.0413, HR=1.243 (95%-CI 1.009, 1.531)). Taken together, we analyzed ARMCX1 expression levels in a large AML patient cohort. In this study, high ARMCX1 expression levels were identified as a negative prognostic factor for AML patients with respect to survival and remission. Disclosures Hiddemann: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Stelljes:Pfizer: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Identifying Factors That Predict for Unplanned Readmissions for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Receiving Consolidation Cytarabine Based Therapies

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3433-3433
Author(s):  
Caitlin Siebenaller ◽  
Madeline Waldron ◽  
Kelly Gaffney ◽  
Brian P. Hobbs ◽  
Ran Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Peripheral Vascular ◽  
Consolidation Chemotherapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
History Of ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Background: Younger patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who enter a remission after intensive induction chemotherapy routinely receive at least one cycle of consolidation therapy with high dose cytarabine (HiDAC). This is commonly administered over a five-day inpatient stay, after which pts are discharged home as their blood counts nadir. It is thus a natural consequence of therapy that readmission for febrile neutropenia (FN) occurs, which can impact measures of quality and value in this population. Precise descriptions of incidence, type, and severity of infection, if identified, are lacking, and thus it is unknown to what standard cancer centers should be held for anticipated readmission. We measured these rates, and attempted to identify predictive factors for readmission. Methods: Adult AML pts ≥ 18 years of age who received at least one cycle of HiDAC consolidation (1000-3000 mg/m2 for six doses) in 2009-2019 were included. Our primary aim was to identify predictive factors for readmission after the first cycle of consolidation chemotherapy. The following pt characteristics and co-morbid conditions were analyzed: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, AML cytogenetic risk status, history of diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, cardiovascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, hepatic impairment, and other cancers. Secondary aims included: estimating rates of all-cause readmissions among all HiDAC cycles, defining the rate of FN readmissions, estimating rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, clinical (e.g., probable pneumonia per imaging) and microbiologically-documented infections, prophylactic (ppx) medications used, and mortality. Statistical analyses interrogated potential risk factors for evidence of association with hospital readmission after the first cycle of consolidation chemotherapy. Results: We identified 182 AML pts who fit inclusion criteria. The median age was 50 years (range 19-73); 55% were female and 45% were male. Statistical analyses revealed no association with readmission after cycle 1 for cytogenetic risk (p=0.85), history of heart failure (p= 0.67), chronic pulmonary disease (p=1), connective tissue disease (p=0.53), cerebrovascular accident (p=0.63), diabetes (p=0.63), gender (p=0.07), history of lymphoma (p=0.53), other solid tumors (p=0.53), liver disease (p=1), myocardial infarction (p=0.71), peripheral vascular disease (p=1), or smoking status (p= 0.52). For 480 HiDAC cycles analyzed (88% at 3000 mg/m2), the overall readmission rate was 50% (242/480), of which 85% (205/242) were for FN. Those readmissions which were not FN were for cardiac complications (chest pain, EKG changes), non-neutropenic fevers or infections, neurotoxicity, bleeding or clotting events, or other symptoms associated with chemotherapy (nausea/vomiting, pain, etc.). Median time to FN hospital admission was 18 days (range 6-27) from the start of HiDAC. Of the 205 FN readmissions, 57% had documented infections. Of these infections, 41% were bacteremia, 23% fungal, 16% sepsis, 12% other bacterial, and 8% viral. Of 480 HiDAC cycles, ppx medications prescribed included: 92% fluoroquinolone (442/480), 81% anti-viral (389/480), 30 % anti-fungal (142/480), and 3% colony stimulating factor (14/480). Only 7% (14/205) of FN readmissions resulted in an ICU admission, and 1% (3/205) resulted in death. Conclusions: Approximately half of patients treated with consolidation therapy following intensive induction therapy can be expected to be readmitted to the hospital. The majority of FN readmissions were associated with clinical or microbiologically documented infections and are not avoidable, however ICU admission and death associated with these complications are rare. Readmission of AML pts following HiDAC is expected, and therefore, should be excluded from measures of value and quality. Disclosures Waldron: Amgen: Consultancy. Hobbs:Amgen: Research Funding; SimulStat Inc.: Consultancy. Advani:Macrogenics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Nazha:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmacutical: Research Funding; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; MEI: Other: Data monitoring Committee; Tolero, Karyopharma: Honoraria. Gerds:Imago Biosciences: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Research Funding. Sekeres:Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mukherjee:Partnership for Health Analytic Research, LLC (PHAR, LLC): Consultancy; McGraw Hill Hematology Oncology Board Review: Other: Editor; Projects in Knowledge: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Association of MHC Class I Chain-Related Gene a (MICA) Polymorphisms with Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2075-2075
Author(s):  
Sagar S. Patel ◽  
Betty K. Hamilton ◽  
Lisa Rybicki ◽  
Dawn Thomas ◽  
Arden Emrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Binding Affinity ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Transplant Outcomes ◽  
Nkg2d Receptor

Abstract Background MHC class I chain-related gene A (MICA) is a polymorphic ligand of the natural killer (NKG2D) receptor on immune effector cells. The activating NKG2D receptor controls immune responses by regulating NK cells, NKT cells and γδ-T cells. Dimorphisms at sequence position 129 of the MICA gene confers varying levels of binding affinity to NKG2D receptor. MICA previously has been associated with post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) outcomes including graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD), infection, and relapse. However, it is unclear how MICA interacts with cytogenetic and somatic mutations in regards to these outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods We conducted a single center, retrospective analysis of adult AML patients in first or second complete remission (CR1, CR2), who underwent T-cell replete matched related or unrelated donor alloHCT. Analysis was limited to those who had MICA data available for donors and recipients. In addition to cytogenetic risk group stratification by European LeukemiaNet criteria (Döhner H, et al, Blood 2016), a subset of patients had a 36-gene somatic mutation panel assessed prior to alloHCT by next-generation sequencing. Dimorphisms at the MICA-129 position have previously been categorized as weaker (valine/valine: V/V), heterozygous (methionine/valine: M/V), or stronger (methionine/methionine: M/M) receptor binding affinity. Fine and Gray or Cox regression was used to identify the association of MICA and outcomes with results as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results From 2000 - 2017, 131 AML patients were identified meeting inclusion criteria. Median age at transplant was 54 years (18-74), with 98% Caucasian. Disease status at transplant included 78% CR1 and 22% CR2. Cytogenetic risk stratification showed 13% of patients as favorable, 56% as intermediate, and 31% as adverse-risk. The five most common somatic mutations were FLT3 (15%), NPM1 (14%), DNMT3A (11%), TET2 (7%), and NRAS (6%). 60% of patients had a related donor. A myeloablative transplant was performed in 84% of patients and 53% had a bone marrow graft source. The most common conditioning regimen used was busulfan/cyclophosphamide (52%). 12% of patients were MICA mismatched with their donor. The distribution of donor MICA-129 polymorphisms were 41% V/V, 53% M/V, and 6% M/M. In univariable analysis, donor-recipient MICA mismatch tended to be associated with a lower risk of infection (HR 0.49, CI 0.23-1.02, P=0.06) and grade 2-4 acute GvHD (HR 0.25, CI 0.06-1.04, P=0.06) but was not associated with other post-transplant outcomes. In multivariable analysis, donor MICA-129 V/V was associated with a higher risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR 2.02, CI 1.01-4.05, P=0.047) (Figure 1) along with increasing patient age at transplant (HR 1.46, CI 1.10-1.93, p=0.008) and the presence of a TET2 mutation (HR 6.00, CI 1.77-20.3, P=0.004). There were no differences between the V/V and the M/V+M/M cohorts regarding somatic mutational status, cytogenetics and other pre-transplant characteristics and post-transplant outcomes. With a median follow-up of 65 months for both cohorts, 45% vs. 49% of patients remain alive, respectively. The most common causes of death between the V/V and the M/V+M/M cohorts was relapse (38% vs. 62%) and infection (31% vs. 8%), respectively. Conclusion While previous studies have demonstrated associations of somatic mutations and cytogenetics with survival outcomes after alloHCT for AML, we observed mutations in TET2 and the V/V donor MICA-129 polymorphism to be independently prognostic for NRM. Mechanistic studies may be considered to assess for possible interactions of TET2 mutations with NK cell alloreactivity. The weaker binding affinity to the NKG2D receptor by the V/V phenotype may diminish immune responses against pathogens that subsequently contribute to higher NRM. These observations may have implications for enhancing patient risk stratification prior to transplant and optimizing donor selection. Future investigation with larger cohorts interrogating pre-transplant AML somatic mutations with MICA polymorphisms on post-transplant outcomes may further elucidate which subsets of patients may benefit most from transplant. Disclosures Nazha: MEI: Consultancy. Mukherjee:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Projects in Knowledge: Honoraria; BioPharm Communications: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squib: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LEK Consulting: Consultancy, Honoraria; Aplastic Anemia & MDS International Foundation in Joint Partnership with Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute: Honoraria. Advani:Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Carraway:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Balaxa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; FibroGen: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Gerds:Apexx Oncology: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy. Sekeres:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maciejewski:Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Ra Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Ra Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Majhail:Incyte: Honoraria; Anthem, Inc.: Consultancy; Atara: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Phase I Study of Ixazomib with Conventional Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Adults

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 7-8
Author(s):  
Philip C. Amrein ◽  
Eyal C. Attar ◽  
Geoffrey Fell ◽  
Traci M. Blonquist ◽  
Andrew M. Brunner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Introduction: Outcomes for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) among older patients has remained largely unchanged for decades. Long-term survival for patients aged &gt;60 years is poor (median survival 10.5 months). Targeting the proteasome in AML is attractive, since leukemia stem cells have demonstrated sensitivity to proteasome inhibition in preclinical models, perhaps through down regulation of nuclear NF-KB (Guzman, Blood 2001). AML cell lines are susceptible to synergistic cytotoxicity when bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, is combined with daunorubicin and cytarabine. We have shown that adding bortezomib to standard treatment in AML results in a high remission rate, although grade 2 sensory neurotoxicity was noted in approximately 12% of treated patients. A newer generation proteasome inhibitor, ixazomib, is less frequently associated with neurotoxicity, and, therefore, was selected for combination with conventional chemotherapy in this phase I trial. The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ixazomib in combination with conventional induction and consolidation chemotherapy for AML. Herein are the initial results of this trial. Methods: Adults &gt;60 years of age with newly diagnosed AML were screened for eligibility. Patients with secondary AML were eligible, including those with prior hypomethylating agent therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We excluded those with promyelocytic leukemia. There were 2 phases in this study. In the first phase (A), the induction treatment consisted of the following: cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day by continuous IV infusion, Days 1-7; daunorubicin 60 mg/m2/day IV, Days 1, 2, 3, and ixazomib was provided orally at the cohort dose, Days 2, 5, 9, and 12. Consolidaton or transplant was at the discretion of the treating physician in phase A. In the second phase (B), induction was the same as that with the determined MTD of ixazomib. All patients were to be treated with the following consolidation: cytarabine at 2 g/m2/day, days 1-5 with ixazomib on days 2, 5, 9, and 12 at the cohort dose for consolidation. A standard 3 + 3 patient cohort dose escalation design was used to determine whether the dose of ixazomib could be safely escalated in 3 cohorts (1.5 mg/day, 2.3 mg/day, 3.0 mg/day), initially in induction (phase A) and subsequently in consolidation (phase B). The determined MTD of ixazomib in the first portion (A) of the trial was used during induction in the second portion (B), which sought to determine the MTD for ixazomib during consolidation. Secondary objectives included rate of complete remission, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Results: Thirty-six patients have been enrolled on study, and 28 have completed dose levels A-1 through A-3 and B1 through B-2. Full information on cohort B-3 has not yet been obtained, hence, this report covers the experience with the initial 28 patients, cohorts A-1 through B-2. There were 12 (43%) patients among the 28 with secondary AML, either with prior hematologic malignancy or therapy-related AML. Nineteen patients (68%) were male, and the median age was 68 years (range 61-80 years). There have been no grade 5 toxicities due to study drug. Three patients died early due to leukemia, 2 of which were replaced for assessment of the MTD. Nearly all the grade 3 and 4 toxicities were hematologic (Table). There was 1 DLT (grade 4 platelet count decrease extending beyond Day 42). There has been no grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity with ixazomib to date. Among the 28 patients in the first 5 cohorts, 22 achieved complete remissions (CR) and 2 achieved CRi, for a composite remission rate (CCR) of 86%. Among the 12 patients with secondary AML 8 achieved CR and 2 achieved CRi, for a CCR of 83%. The median OS for the 28 patients has not been reached (graph). The 18-month OS estimate was 65% [90% CI, 50-85%]. Conclusions: The highest dose level (3 mg) of ixazomib planned for induction in this trial has been reached safely. For consolidation there have been no serious safety issues in the first 2 cohorts with a dose up to 2.3 mg, apart from 1 DLT in the form of delayed platelet count recovery. The recommended phase 2 dose of ixazomib for induction is 3 mg. Accrual to cohort B-3 is ongoing. Notably, to date, no grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity has been encountered. The remission rate in this older adult population with the addition of ixazomib to standard chemotherapy appears favorable. Figure Disclosures Amrein: Amgen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Attar:Aprea Therapeutics: Current Employment. Brunner:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forty-Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Hobbs:Constellation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria. Neuberg:Celgene: Research Funding; Madrigak Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Fathi:Blueprint: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Newlink Genetics: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Ixazomib is FDA approved for multiple myeloma. We are using it in this trial for acute myeloid leukemia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document