COVID-19 in Patients with Lymphoma: A Grupo De Estudio Latinoamericano En Linfoproliferativos (GELL) Retrospective Study
Introduction: SARS-COV-2 pandemic has infected approximately 20 million people worldwide and more than 700.000 fatalities have been reported. Patients with malignant hematological diseases are at particular risk for unfavorable outcomes, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission, need for mechanical ventilation (MV) and death. There is paucity of data of the outcome of cancer patients with COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries. GELL is a collaborative network of hematological centers in 13 countries in Latin America. In this retrospective study, we aimed to look at the outcome of lymphoma patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in Latin America. Methods: This is a retrospective study including patients with a diagnosis of lymphoma and COVID-19 infection. Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma were excluded from the analysis. COVID-19 diagnosis was done by RT-PCR in all but 3 patients, in whom the diagnosis was done by serology. Active disease was defined as patients with detected disease in any setting (prior to therapy, relapse) or patients currently on treatment. Survival curves were plotted using Kaplan Meier method. Results: A total of 117 patients were available for analysis. Median age was 60 years old, and 44% of patients had at least one comorbidity, including 32% with hypertension, 17% with obesity, 11% with cardiovascular disease and 17% with diabetes. Most patients had aggressive lymphomas (67%), including 46% of patients with diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Follicular lymphomas was observed in 13% of patients and Hodgkin's lymphoma in 10% of patients. 84% of patients had active disease, and 70% of patients were currently on treatment. With a median follow up of 17 days from COVID-19 diagnosis, 78% were admitted to Hospital, 30% needed ICU support, and 27% needed MV. Importantly, 26% of patients died, most of them within 20 days from diagnosis (Fig. 1). There was no relation between active disease (p=0.23), current treatment (p=0.65) or use of monoclonal antibodies (p=0.24) with death. COVID-19 treatment data was available in 107 patients, and 72 of them received any treatment, being steroids, the most common treatment used (n=59). Conclusion: We confirm the dismal prognosis of patients with hematological malignancies and COVID-19 infection. In our cohort of Latin America patients with lymphoma and COVID-19, 26% of patients died with a median follow up of 17 days. No impact of current treatment or use of monoclonal antibodies were observed. Figure Disclosures Peña: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; BindingSite: Research Funding. Idrobo:Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Tecnofarma: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Abello:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Dr. Reddy's: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rojas:Novartis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Castillo:Beigene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kymera: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Villela:amgen: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau.
Introduction: 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) remains the standard of care for baseline and end of treatment scans for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). However, the role of interim FDG-PET remains not as well defined across aggressive NHLs, especially in the era of high-intensity chemoimmunotherapy. Interim FDG-PET (iPET) can serve as an early prognostic tool, and prior studies evaluating the utility of iPET-guided treatment strategies primarily focused on diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) and frontline R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). Classification criteria systems assessing response also differ between studies with no clear consensus between use of Deauville criteria (DC), International Harmonization Project (IHP), and the ΔSUVmax method. Methods: This study evaluates our institutional experience with iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R (dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin with or without Rituximab) in aggressive NHLs. We retrospectively evaluated 70 patients at Moffitt Cancer Center who started on DA-EPOCH ± R between 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2018 for aggressive NHLs. Response on interim and end-of-treatment (EOT) scans were graded per DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods, and progression free survival (PFS) probability estimates were calculated with chi-square testing and Kaplan Meier method. PFS outcomes were compared between interim negative and positive scans based on each scoring method. Outcomes were also compared between groups based on interim versus EOT positive or negative scans. Results: We identified 70 patients with aggressive NHLs who received DA-EPOCH ± R at our institute. The most common diagnoses were DLBCL (61%) followed by Burkitt's lymphoma (10%), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (9%), plasmablastic lymphoma (7%), gray zone lymphoma (6%), primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma (1%), primary effusion lymphoma (1%), and other high-grade NHL not otherwise specified (3%). Of the 43 patients with DLBCL, 21/43 (49%) had double hit lymphoma (DHL) while 7/43 (16%) had triple hit lymphoma (THL), and 3/43 (7%) had MYC-rearranged DLBCL while 2/43 (5%) had double expressor DLBCL. Thirty nine out of 70 (56%) were female, and median age at diagnosis was 58.39 years (range 22.99 - 86.86 years). Most patients had stage IV disease (49/70, 70%), and 43/70 (61%) had more than one extranodal site while 45/70 (64%) had IPI score ≥ 3. Forty-six out of 70 (66%) received central nervous system prophylaxis, most with intrathecal chemotherapy (44/70, 63%). Fifty-five out of 70 (79%) had iPET available while 6/70 (9%) had interim computerized tomography (CT) scans. Fifty-six out of 70 (80%) had EOT PET, and 4/70 (6%) had EOT CT scans. Sustained complete remission occurred in 46/70 (66%) after frontline DA-EPOCH ± R (CR1), and 12/70 (17%) were primary refractory while 5/70 (7%) had relapse after CR1. Four of 70 (6%) died before cycle 3, and 3/70 (4%) did not have long-term follow-up due to transition of care elsewhere. Median follow-up was 15.29 months (range 0.85 - 60.09 months). There was significantly better PFS observed if iPET showed DC 1-3 compared to DC 4-5 (Χ2=5.707, p=0.0169), and PFS was better if iPET was negative by IHP criteria (Χ2=4.254, p=0.0392) or ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=6.411, p=0.0113). Comparing iPET to EOT PET, there was significantly better PFS if iPET was negative with EOT PET negative (iPET-/EOT-) compared to iPET positive with EOT negative (iPET+/EOT-), and iPET+/EOT+ and iPET-/EOT+ had worse PFS after iPET-/EOT- and iPET+/EOT- respectively. This pattern in iPET/EOT PFS probability remained consistent when comparing DC (Χ2=30.041, p<0.0001), IHP (Χ2=49.078, p<0.0001), and ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=9.126, p=0.0104). These findings fit clinical expectations with positive EOT scans indicating primary refractory disease. There was no significant difference in PFS when comparing DLBCL versus non-DLBCL (Χ2=3.461, p=0.0628) or DHL/THL versus non-DHL/THL diagnoses (Χ2=2.850, p=0.0914). Conclusion: Our findings indicate a prognostic role of iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R for aggressive NHLs. Significant differences in PFS were seen when graded by DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods used in prior studies and when comparing interim versus EOT response. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. Disclosures Bello: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Shah:Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Spectrum/Astrotech: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene/Juno: Honoraria. Sokol:EUSA: Consultancy. Chavez:Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Abstract Introduction Among patients with aggressive B-NHL who fail RCHOP, about half respond to standard salvage regimens and may proceed to curative-intent, transplant-based therapy. However, whether pts failing more intensive regimens such as dose-adjusted, infusional EPOCH benefit from standard salvage regimens is unclear. We hypothesized that such patients comprise a higher-risk cohort, facing inferior response rates and outcomes using standard salvage regimens. We undertook a collaborative study to assess response rates and survival among pts failing EPOCH for aggressive B-NHL, to inform patient management and design of clinical trials in this setting. Methods Pharmacy records and institutional databases were queried, identifying pts receiving EPOCH over the last 10 years at the University of Washington/SCCA and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, for combined analysis. Under IRB approval, patient characteristics, histology, outcome with EPOCH, time to EPOCH failure, response to salvage, and overall survival were analyzed. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, B-cell-lymphoma unclassifiable, HIV-associated B cell lymphoma, and transformed B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma were included. Pts receiving <2 cycles EPOCH, or who had inadequate follow-up (<3 months), were excluded. Failure of EPOCH was defined as failure to respond or progression during therapy, need for initiation of salvage therapy, or death during therapy of any cause. Adverse events or treatment change due to toxicity were not included in the definition of failure. JMP 11 was used to generate kaplan-meier survival estimates. Results 124 pts with aggressive B-NHL receiving EPOCH were identified. 54 had not relapsed, and among 70 remaining da-EPOCH failures, 37 met the above inclusion criteria. Median age was 55. 27% were female, and 23 received EPOCH as first-line therapy. All but 3 received rituximab with EPOCH. Histologies were primarily DLBCL in 22/37 (60%) and BCL-U in 12/37 (32%) carrying a MYC translocation; most of these harbored additional translocations in BCL2 and/or BCL6 (10/12). However, data regarding MYC rearrangement was not available for all pts. 2 had HIV-associated B-NHL and 3 had PMBCL. With 18 months follow up, the median time to EPOCH failure was 5 months. Only 3 EPOCH failures occurred late (>12 months). Median OS from the date of EPOCH failure was 10 months (Figure 1). Those receiving EPOCH as first-line therapy (23) had a median OS of 14 months from EPOCH failure, as opposed to 4 months for those receiving EPOCH as salvage therapy (log-rank p=.01). Salvage chemotherapy regimens after EPOCH were diverse, and generally ineffective; 6/28 (21%) regimens produced a response (Table 1). Among patients failing EPOCH within a year, platinum-containing salvage (RICE/RDHAP) was effective in only 2/13 patients (15%). 9 patients did not receive any salvage, most of whom died or proceeded to palliative measures and/or hospice care. Conclusions A relatively low overall response rate (21%) was observed in this retrospective analysis of patients failing EPOCH. Analogous to early RCHOP failure in the CORAL study, those failing EPOCH within a year may face inferior outcomes with platinum-based salvage therapy. While combined from two institutions, our data represent a modest sample size and require confirmation. If verified, examination of mechanisms of resistance to EPOCH, and selecting EPOCH failures for clinical trials of novel targeted therapies and transplant-based approaches, may prove critical. Table 1. Salvage Therapy for REPOCH failures Regimen: response/total number treated Notes Response to any salvage: 6/28 (21%) Some patients received more than 1 chemo salvage; responses were tabulated per regimen. RICE: 4/12 2/3 alive post transplant(1 auto 1 allo; 1 declined transplant and survived; 1 died) RDHAP: 1/6 Gemcitabine-based: 0/5 HyperCVAD (Part A and/or B): 1/5 Survivor had CNS only relapse, received regimen B and transplant 9- received no systemic treatmen; most died or proceeded to palliative measures and/or hospice Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Gopal: Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Emergent/Abbott: Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BioMarin: Research Funding; Piramal: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Hill:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Till:Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.
Abstract Median age at diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia is 72 years. However, only few patients over 80 years of age are included in clinical trials, even in those devoted to unfit patients. In order to evaluate both efficiency and safety of venetoclax in this category of patients, we conducted a multicentric retrospective study and collected data from 77 CLL patients from 19 FILO centers who started venetoclax after 80 years of age. Median age at venetoclax initiation was 86 years old (81-97). 63% of patients had a history of heart disease, 62% had renal failure (moderate 59% and severe 3%) and 29% had a history of severe infections. Despite their comorbidities and a CIRS greater than 6 in 70% of cases, their autonomy was preserved with a median performans status of 1 (0-4). In this comorbid geriatric population, pretherapeutic geriatric assessment was only performed in a single patient. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (0-6) with an exposure to a BCR inhibitor in 56% of cases. 11q and 17p deletion were found in 39% and 30% of cases respectively, 39% of patients had a complex karyotype and 30% harbored a TP53 mutation. However, in this real life population, these prognostic factors were only performed in half of patients. IGHV mutational status was only available in 11 patients, and 83% of them had unmutated IGHV. At the time of venetoclax initiation, the tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) risk was moderate in 57% of cases and high in 8% of cases. Venetoclax was administered as a single agent (42%) or in association with rituximab (58%). In total, half of the patients were hospitalized at each dose ramp-up, and only 3 patients were treated on outpatient basis. 82% of the cohort was able to reach the daily dose of 400mg. Half of the patients were included in a phone call monitoring program with oncology nurses to pre-emptively manage side effects and foster therapy adherence. The safety study reported 14% of TLS, with 2 discontinuations of treatment within the first month: one of which led to dialysis and the other to death. As in the previously published studies, 25% of patients had infectious complications, and grade 3 haematological and digestive toxicities were reported in 42% and 22% of cases, respectively. The reduction of the daily dose of venetoclax was necessary for 33%. Permanent discontinuation of venetoclax occurred in 40% of subjects, including 29% of early withdrawal (within the first 3 months). Main reasons for discontinuation were intolerance (21%), CLL progression (21%), death (21%) and scheduled treatment discontinuation (10%). The overall response rate was 86%, consisting of 49% of complete response (unconfirmed by bone marrow biopsy) and 37% of partial response. With a median follow-up of 21months, estimated progression free survival and overall survival were 29 and 38 months respectively. Prior exposure to a BCR inhibitor had no impact on progression free survival. To conclude, venetoclax has a manageable safety profile in elderly patients with comorbidities and can induce prolonged responses. Finally, if additional follow-up by oncology nurses seems to be more and more implemented, the pre-therapeutic onco-geriatric evaluation remains underexploited in this population. Disclosures Ferrant: AstraZeneca: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Janssen: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Feugier: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria. Laribi: AstraZeneca: Other: Personal Fees; Le Mans Hospital: Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Jansen: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; IQONE: Other: Personal Fees; Astellas Phama, Inc.: Other: Personal Fees; BeiGene: Other: Personal Fees; Takeda: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding. Tchernonog: JANSSEN: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy; ASTRAZENECA: Consultancy. Dartigeas: Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress. Quinquenel: Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria.
Introduction: Salvage immunochemotherapy (IC) followed by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) is standard-of-care second-line therapy (2L) for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) deemed fit for autoSCT as per the CORAL study (J Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep 20;28(27):4184-90). Optimal therapeutic management of patients with R/R DLBCL who are autoSCT-ineligible is unknown. Here we describe the real-world outcomes of patients with R/R DLBCL who receive palliative intent 2L therapy in community and academic settings and do not receive autoSCT. Methods: This analysis includes de-identified patients from the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived database with a histologic diagnosis of DLBCL and R/R disease after frontline IC who do not undergo autoSCT and receive treatment with either bendamustine-based therapy, gemcitabine-based therapy, lenalidomide, or ibrutinib. Patients receiving rituximab/ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide (R-ICE) and high-dose cytarabine-containing second-line therapies were excluded. Event free survival (EFS) was defined as the interval between the start of current therapy and start of subsequent therapy if needed, last follow-up on current therapy, or death on therapy. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time between start of current therapy and death or last follow-up while alive. Results: A total of 250 patients were eligible for inclusion in 2L. Eight patients received autoSCT after gemcitabine therapy and were excluded from this analysis. Clinicopathologic characteristics at time of diagnosis include 56% male, 87% age >60, 55% ECOG performance status >1, 87% stage III-IV disease, 78% IPI >2, 56% germinal center (GCB) of those with cell of origin testing performed, 9% cMYC rearrangement positive when tested, and 29% transformed from indolent disease. A total of 106, 78, 36, and 22 patients received bendamustine, gemcitabine, lenalidomide, and ibrutinib, respectively. For all patients, median EFS was 5.1 months and median OS was 14.3 months in 2L. Median EFS was 7.6, 2.4, 9.1, and 4.2 months, and median OS was 16.0, 9.4, 16.3, and 11 months for bendamustine, gemcitabine, lenalidomide, and ibrutinib in 2L, respectively. Patients receiving bendamustine and lenalidomide demonstrated significantly improved EFS compared to those receiving gemcitabine (p=0.001 and 0.01, respectively), see Figure 1. We observed no difference in EFS (p=0.40) or OS (p=0.89) between lenalidomide and bendamustine in 2L. Univariate analysis demonstrated receipt of gemcitabine, ECOG PS>1, and IPI >2 to have statistically significant increased hazard for treatment failure and ECOG PS>1 to have an increased hazard for death in 2L relative to the reference group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated receipt of gemcitabine (HR 1.57, p=0.03 95% CI: 1.04 - 2.37) and ECOG PS>1 (HR 1.61, p=0.02 95% CI: 1.09-2.38) were associated with an increased hazard for treatment failure in 2L. Median EFS for patients on lenalidomide was 6.7 and 8 months (p=0.26), and median OS was 13.9 and 12.2 months (p =0.48) for patients with nonGCB and GCB cell of origin, respectively. Conclusions: For patients with R/R DLBCL treated with palliative therapy in the 2L, bendamustine- and lenalidomide-based therapies resulted in significantly longer EFS compared to gemcitabine therapy. Although we cannot exclude the possibility that some patients received gemcitabine in 2L with the original intent to proceed with autoSCT, this does not contest our results as this therapy remains inferior to bendamustine and lenalidomide even if given to a potentially more fit patient population. Analysis shows no difference in outcomes by cell of origin if receiving lenalidomide in 2L. These findings may serve as benchmarks for outcomes following receipt of these therapies in the non-investigational setting and suggest both bendamustine and lenalidomide may be considered reasonable standard-of-care therapies for patients unfit for autoSCT in the 2L setting. Figure 1 Disclosures Landsburg: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Triphase: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Curis, INC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Curis, INC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Triphase: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Outcomes with lenalidomide and ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL will be discussed.
INTRODUCTION Recent studies have suggested that the prognosis of HIV-associated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (HIV-DLBCL) may be improving with advances in anti-retroviral therapies (ART). A pooled analysis of clinical trial data showed that EPOCH may be associated with superior outcomes as compared to CHOP (Barta et al. Blood. 2013), but about two-third of patients in the combined analysis were treated without rituximab. A recent French study, however, showed similar overall survival (OS) between R-CHOP and R-EPOCH treated patients (Besson et al. AIDS 2017) and a phase III trial showed similar efficacy of R-CHOP vs. R-EPOCH in HIV-uninfected DLBCL (Bartlett et al. JCO 2019). The optimum frontline therapy in HIV-DLBCL is unknown as most clinical trials exclude HIV-infected patients or restrict accrual to those with undetectable HIV viral load and minimum CD4 count cut-off. Moreover, most existing studies include a majority (>60%) Caucasian population, and there is a paucity of studies on outcomes in African-American population. In this retrospective study, we describe the clinical features and outcomes of HIV-DLBCL patients seen at our institution and compare them with HIV negative DLBCL patients. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of HIV+ DLBCL cases diagnosed and treated at our institution from 2008-2020. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to assess overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess prognostic factors. HIV-DLBCL patients were matched 1:2 with HIV negative DLBCL by age and stage of lymphoma at diagnosis. Comparison of OS analysis was conducted using log-rank method and predictors of progression or death using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS We included a total of 33 patients with HIV-DLBCL in our study. Median age was 46.6 years (IQR 40-53.3), 25 (76%) were males, and 20 (61%) were African-Americans (Table). 28 (85%) patients had stage III/IV and 24 (73%) had extranodal disease at diagnosis. The median CD4 count at diagnosis was 252 (IQR 89.5-409). 6 (18%) had CNS involvement at diagnosis, for which the median OS was 8.3 months. First-line treatment included rituximab-chemotherapy combinations in 25 (76%) patients. All patients continued ART during first line treatment. Median follow up duration of the entire cohort was 2.06 years (IQR 0.53-5.02 years) and 5 (15.2%) were lost to follow up. The 2-year OS for R-CHOP treated patients was 63% vs. 38% for R-EPOCH treated patients, although this failed to reach statistical significance (p=0.125). On multivariate analysis, the only factor significantly associated with difference in event free survival (EFS; progression or death) was female sex (HR 19.86; [2.652-148.7]; p=0.004). Trends were seen towards shorter EFS among patients who were tobacco smokers at time of DLBCL diagnosis (HR 2.69; 0.463-15.6]; p=0.271), CD4+ count <200 at time of DLBCL diagnosis (HR 2.39; [0.519-11.0]; p=0.264), IPI score >3 (HR 2.98; [0.480-18.5]; p=0.241), and presence of MYC gene rearrangement (HR 3.93; [0.569-27.2]; p=0.165). Treatment type (R-CHOP, R-EPOCH), ART use prior to lymphoma diagnosis, race, and insurance status were not correlated with EFS. 11 (33.3%) patients died within 1 year of diagnosis. The 2-year OS for the entire cohort was 64% vs. 68% in matched HIV-negative DLBCL patients (p=0.651). Median OS for HIV+ patients was 2.14 years (IQR 0.23-5.77) vs 2.97 years (IQR 0.76-6.48) in matched HIV-negative DLBCL patients (p=0.3996). One patient died from acute hypoxemic respiratory failure prior to starting treatment. Four patients died of complications during their first inpatient chemotherapy administration. CONCLUSION In our cohort, most HIV-DLBCL patients were African-Americans, presented with advanced stage and extranodal disease. The survival of HIV-associated DLBCL was similar to HIV-negative counterparts. All HIV-DLBCL continued ART during chemotherapy, suggesting the feasibility of this approach. There was no difference in OS between patients treated with R-CHOP vs. R-EPOCH, however there was a trend towards increased OS in patients treated with R-CHOP. CNS involvement at diagnosis was frequently seen. Despite limited sample size, we observed a significant association with gender, and a trend toward significant factors including tobacco use and low CD4 count at time of diagnosis. Disclosures Mehta: TG Therapeutics:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Merck:Research Funding;Roche-Genentech:Research Funding;Kite/Gilead:Research Funding;Innate Pharmaceuticals:Research Funding;Seattle Genetics:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Oncotartis:Research Funding;Gelgene/BMS:Research Funding;Juno Parmaceuticals/BMS:Research Funding;fortyseven Inc/Gilead:Research Funding;Takeda:Research Funding;Incyte:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Affimed:Research Funding.
Introduction In multiple myeloma (MM), the absence of measurable residual disease (MRD) after completed therapy is associated with longer progression free survival. Different techniques are available to detect low levels of plasma cells in bone marrow (BM) either by flow cytometry or by next-generation sequencing as a gold standard of molecular methods. But these techniques are limited because they require a representative bone marrow sample obtained by an invasive procedure. Therefore, detecting low levels of disease in blood would be ideal, because serial sampling is much easier and fully representative, and it would allow for the detection of extramedullary disease. Mass spectrometry-based methods have been shown to be more sensitive for detecting monoclonal proteins (M-protein) in serum. In this study, we were motivated to evaluate MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) head-to-head with an established BM-based MRD assays. Patients and Methods This cohort included 71 patients treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) who had serum samples available at 2 timepoints including during active disease and within 60 days of MRD results as determined by flow cytometry of bone marrow aspirates (Flow-BM-MRD). The cohort enrolled 26 females and 45 males with a median age of 61 years (range 37-78 years). Twenty-seven patients had high-risk cytogenetics at baseline. The median time between diagnosis and the MRD timepoint was 13.4 months (3.4-91 months). MALDI-TOF MS analysis was performed according to the method published by Mills et al. Immunoglobulins were purified from serum samples using CaptureSelect beads specific of each isotype and were then eluted from the beads. Light chains and heavy chains were separated by the addition of a reducing agent. Purified samples were mixed in matrix and spotted onto a stainless steel MALDI plate and were analyzed using a Microflex LT MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker). Samples taken during active disease were used to identify the mass to charge ratio (m/z) of the M-protein and served as a surrogate marker in the analysis of subsequent samples. MALDI-TOF MS results were compared to the Flow-BM-MRD assay, performed using the MSKCC's ten-color, single-tube method. Results MALDI-TOF MS detected an M-protein in all 71 active disease samples and in 25 MRD samples. MALDI-TOF-MS results at the MRD timepoint were concordant with Flow-BM-MRD for 44/71 patients (p=0.342, chi-square test). Eight patients were positive and 36 negative by both techniques. Twenty-seven patients were discordant, including 10 patients detectable only by Flow-BM-MRD and 17 detectable only by MALDI-TOF MS. Among the 10 patients detectable by flow cytometry but not by MALDI, the median MRD level was 0.00092% (+<0.0001% - 0.011%). The M-protein could have been present but below the polyclonal background. Regarding the 17 patients positive only by MALDI-TOF-MS, the BM sample for flow analysis was not suitable for 3 patients due to hemodilution. The others 14 samples reached the target of sensitivity with a limit of detection of 0.0001%. Alternatively, the MALDI-TOF result could be a false positive in terms of disease detection. MS is likely not falsely detecting M-proteins and indeed, immunofixation was also positive in 11/17 of these samples. However, low levels of M-protein may not indicate the presence of active disease. Indeed, a confounding factor is that immunoglobulins have a long half-life in serum. To determine the clinical utility of more sensitive M-protein detection, we evaluated the clinical outcome for the 48 newly diagnosed MM patients in CR at the MRD timepoint with a median follow-up of 11 months. Of these 48 patients, 2 of the 3 that were positive by both techniques relapsed during follow-up. One out of 27 patients that were negative by both techniques relapsed. None of the 10 patients who were positive only by MALDI-TOF relapsed and 1 of the 8 patients who were positive only by Flow-BM-MRD relapsed. Conclusions This study is important because it is a first step in understanding how to use a more sensitive blood test for the follow-up of MM patients. MALDI-TOF MS analysis may provide complementary results to Flow-BM-MRD especially for the follow-up of patients in CR and during maintenance therapy to detect poor responders that would be positive by both techniques. In summary, our results suggest that MALDI-TOF may be quite useful for early detection of relapse. Disclosures Roshal: Physicians' Education Resource: Other: Provision of services; Celgene: Other: Provision of Services; Auron Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Other: Provision of services. Hassoun:Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics and Precision Biosciences: Consultancy. Lesokhin:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Genentech: Research Funding; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mailankody:Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Landgren:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Theradex: Other: IDMC; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Other: IDMC; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.
Abstract BACKGROUND. HCV-positive DLBCL has distinct clinical and pathologic characteristics compared to its negative counterpart: patients (pts) are usually older with more frequent splenic and extranodal involvement and elevated LDH. Differently from its clinical hallmarks, the molecular landscape of this pathological entity has been scarcely outlined. METHODS. In this bicentric study, we investigated the clinical and molecular features and outcome of 54 pts with HCV-positive DLBCL. Targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue biopsies. A core panel probes covering coding exons from 184 genes frequently mutated in mature B cell neoplasms was designed using IDT tool and libraries were prepared using Illumina DNA-prep-with enrichment. Sequencing was performed on Illumina HiSeq 2500. Cluster analysis was performed using LymphGen tool. We also applied fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC, BCL2 and BCL6. RESULTS. Median age was 71 (33-84; IQR: 61.9-77). Stage was III/IV in 34 pts (63%). Extranodal sites were involved in 21 pts (38%), spleen in 20 pts (37%). LDH was higher than the upper limit in 40 pts (74%). R-IPI was good for 2 pts (4%), intermediate for 24 pts (44%), poor for 28 pts (52%). HPS score was intermediate or high in 33 of 44 assessed pts (75%). A histological low-grade component was identified in 15 pts (27%). Hans algorithm differentiated pts almost equally in GCB (26/50, 52%) and non-GCB (24/50, 48%) subtype. HCV-RNA was detectable in 52 pts (96%) and quantifiable in 43 pts (79%). Of 29 pts assessed, genotype was 1 in 9 (31%), 2 in 16 (55%), 3 in 4 pts (14%). Among 37 pts whose data were available, 11 pts (30%) received direct antiviral agents, 7 pts (19%) received interferon-containing regimen, 19 pts (51%) were not treated for HCV. Twenty-seven pts (50%) received rituximab-enriched protocols, 23 pts (43%) were treated with chemotherapy alone, 1 pt (2%) with surgery alone, 3 pts (5%) were lost to follow up. With a median follow up of 7.7 years (yrs) (IQR: 4.6-10.6), 5-yrs overall survival (OS) (95%CI) was 49.3% (34.1-62.8%) and 5-yrs progression free survival (PFS) (95%CI) was 39.5% (25.5-53.3%). Median OS and PFS were 4.9 and 3.1 yrs, respectively. FISH analysis showed lack of BCL2 (0/19) and MYC translocations (0/15). BCL6 fusions were found in 76% of pts (16/21). NGS showed mutations in 154 of the 184 analyzed genes. The informativity of the panel was 100% with all pts presenting at least one oncogenic variant. Gene mutation frequencies are presented in Fig. 1. The median mutation load (MML) was 13 mutated genes per case (2-32; IQR: 9-16). Most frequently mutated genes were the epigenetic regulators KMT2D, mutated in 23 pts (42.6%), and SETD1B, mutated in 17 pts (31.5%). FAS, PM1 and RERE were mutated in 15 pts each (27.8%). TBL1XR1, BCL11A and SGK1 were mutated in 14 (26%), 13 (24%) and 12 pts (22%), respectively. Considering genes in their specific pathway, 94% of pts harbored mutations in genes involved in epigenetic regulation (MML: 3; range 1-7; IQR: 1.25-4), 90% of pts in apoptosis-related genes (MML: 2; 1-7; IQR: 1-3) and 77% of pts in genes belonging to BCR/NFkB signaling pathway (MML: 2; 1-7; IQR: 1-3). Of note, 56% of pts carried mutations in genes related to immune regulation (MML: 1.7; 1-5; IQR: 1-2) and 25% of pts had mutations within the NOTCH pathway (MML: 1.2; range 1-2). Via the LymphGen 1.0 tool, we classified 26 pts (48%) into 4 genetic clusters: BN2 (11/26, 42%), ST2 (8/26, 31%), MCD (4/26, 15%), EZB (3/26, 12%). Twenty-eight pts (52%) were classified as "others". Among those belonging to BN2 cluster, 7 pts (64%) had a histologically confirmed transformed DLBCL. No significant differences in terms of OS and PFS were identified according to cluster subgroups. CONCLUSIONS. The prevalence of the BN2 cluster and enrichment of mutations of genes involved in NOTCH pathway seem to indicate a preferential marginal-zone origin in HCV-positive DLBCL. In addition, our data confirm the absence of BCL2 translocation in this subset of DLBCL and show a high prevalence of mutated genes within the epigenetic and immune regulation pathways in HCV-positive DLBCL, pointing out their compelling role in the pathogenesis and suggesting potential implications for molecularly targeted therapies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Passamonti: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Arcaini: Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Bayer, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Roche, Sandoz, Janssen-Cilag, VERASTEM: Consultancy; Celgene, Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Gilead: Other: Travel expenses.
Abstract Introduction Lymphoma complicates approximately 1/6000 pregnancies (Pereg, Haematologica 2007), and presents challenges for the patient, her family, and medical professionals. This rare event raises unique therapeutic, social and ethical issues, with the welfare of both mother and unborn child to consider. There are challenges regarding symptom obfuscation, diagnosis delays and treatment delivery. In this retrospective study, we aimed to describe the experience, treatment patterns and outcomes of lymphoma in pregnancy in Australia and New Zealand. Methods We identified patients aged ≥18 diagnosed with lymphoma in pregnancy between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2020 , across 11 institutions in Australia and New Zealand. We defined "lymphoma in pregnancy" as diagnoses occurring during pregnancy (antenatal cases) or the first 12 months after delivery (postpartum cases). Postpartum cases were included to account for the phenomenon of diagnostic delay during gestation due to deferral of diagnostic investigations and symptom obfuscation (de Haan, Lancet Oncol 2018). Overall survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier methods from the date of diagnosis to death, with patients alive and lost to follow-up censored on the last day of follow-up. Results We identified 63 patients, 34 diagnosed antepartum and 29 diagnosed postpartum (Table 1). The most common diagnoses were classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) (35), followed by diffuse large B cell lymphoma (11) and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (6). The median age was 32 (range 23-42) years. Women diagnosed antepartum were more likely to be nulliparous (p=0.004). Of the postpartum cases, symptoms of malignancy first appeared during pregnancy in 24%. At diagnosis, 44% had advanced stage disease. 60% of women had PET as part of baseline staging, however only 8% underwent PET whilst pregnant, all during the second or third trimester. 83% of HL patients had adverse risk factors (mediastinal bulk >1/3 diameter, ESR>50mm/hr, >2 sites). ESR alone, which may be elevated physiologically in pregnancy, was the sole adverse risk factor for 9% of HL patients. Median days between diagnosis and treatment initiation were 14 (IQR 8-30) for antenatal patients and 21 (IQR 7-40) for postnatal. 19% of the antenatal cohort with aggressive lymphoma had treatment deferred/delayed explicitly due to pregnancy. The majority (89%) of antenatal patients were treated with ABVD (HL) or (R)CHOP/(R)EPOCH (NHL) whilst pregnant. 3 patients received first-line treatment divergent from standard (vinblastine for HL, interferon for indolent B-NHL and surgery for primary cutaneous ALCL). 37% received radiotherapy, although only 1 patient received it antenatally. Median follow up was 34 months. 5 year OS for HL was 83% (95%CI 54%-95%) and for DLBCL 74% (95%CI 30%-93%)(Figure 1). Seven patients died (4 from lymphoma, 2 treatment-related infection, 1 unknown). Discussion of elective termination of pregnancy was documented in 24 of 34 antenatal diagnoses, advised in 3 and performed in 2, both in the first trimester. Only 31 (49%) of 63 women had documented evidence of counselling regarding future fertility strategies. Of the 48 patients with available data, there were 45 live births, 2 elective terminations and 1 spontaneous abortion in the first trimester. The mean gestation at birth was significantly earlier and marginally preterm for antenatal diagnoses (mean 35.6wk v 38.2wk, p=0.002). 6 neonates (11%) were small for gestational age, 5 of whom were born to mothers diagnosed antenatally. 29% of neonates were admitted to neonatal intensive care or special care units. There were no cases of neonatal neutropenia, one case of sepsis of prematurity and one case of PJP infection in a term baby. Conclusion Lymphoma in pregnancy is rare and lacks a harmonised approach. We present a large multicentre cohort reflecting contemporary practice. Although standard therapy could be provided to most patients, delays in treatment and diagnosis were common, and most antenatally-diagnosed women did not receive optimal staging. Neonates in the antenatally-diagnosed group were more likely to be premature, however there are likely a number of confounders and causality cannot be presumed. There were no neonatal deaths. It is imperative to continue to report on data regarding lymphoma in pregnancy to inform optimal care in this setting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Greenwood: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gregory: Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel fees, Speakers Bureau. Hamad: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.
Introduction: Lenalidomide (R) maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). Even in the transplant ineligible population, R until progression is associated with improved PFS. The ever-increasing use of R maintenance therapy, however, eventually leads to refractoriness to R at maintenance doses. Moreover, clinical trials with len-dex (Rd) backbone regimens including daratumumab, elotuzumab, ixazomib, and carfilzomib have all excluded such patients (pts). This is particularly an issue for elotuzumab and ixazomib, which have no single agent approval. There are currently no published data on the outcomes of full dose Rd or Rd backbone containing regimens in pts refractory to R maintenance. A prospective randomized trial would be difficult to perform given variability in pt factors (i.e. R tolerance, age, renal function) and disease factors (i.e. molecular risk and clinical vs biochemical progression). We therefore performed a retrospective study to characterize outcomes of pts on R maintenance therapy. Methods: This is a single-institution, retrospective study in which we reviewed the records of all consecutive pts with a diagnosis of MM at the Mount Sinai Hospital between February 2010 and October 2016. There were 465 pts identified who had maintenance R as a single agent or in combination with low-dose dexamethasone or prednisone. Pts were excluded if insufficient data were available or < 3 month (mo) follow up from time of initiation of R maintenance. Time to progression (TTP) on R maintenance, next line of therapy, and PFS on next line of therapy were determined using Kaplan Meyer analysis. Results: A total of 350 pts were included in this study. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median follow up time was 59 mos and median time on R maintenance was 21.0 mos. 172 pts (49%) progressed while on R maintenance or within 60 days of R discontinuation. 51 pts (15%) remain on R maintenance as of last follow up. The remaining 127 pts (36%) discontinued R for reasons other than progression and either progressed after 60 days (median 658 days, range 91-2053 days) or have not progressed. The median TTP on R maintenance was 34.2 mos (Fig 1A) and the majority of these were characterized by the treating physician as biochemical (65% during maintenance and 56% after R discontinuation). Of the patients with serologic and symptomatic progression, the majority were by bone disease (24% and 37%, respectively). 234 pts had data available on next line of therapy and the median PFS on this next line was 16.8 mo (95% CI: 13.2-20.1), however the PFS was shorter for those who had progressed while on R maintenance versus those who had progressed after R maintenance had been discontinued (13.2 mos vs. 28.9 mos, respectively, p 0.0001). The median PFS according to next line of therapy for those who received an increase in R dose + dex vs 3rd agent added to Rd backbone vs total change in therapy was 9.5 mos vs 21.0 mos vs 14.2 mos, respectively (Fig 1B). The most common drugs added to an Rd backbone were bortezomib and elotuzumab with an associated PFS of 19.0 and 40.1 mos, respectively. The majority of those receiving elotuzumab + Rd had progressed on R maintenance (15/18 = 83%). The most common regimens for those with a total change in therapy are summarized in Table 2. Conclusions: The median TTP on R maintenance was 34.2 mos and while most progression was felt to be biochemical, of those with symptomatic progression as well, the primary manifestation was bone disease (approximately 30% of patients), highlighting the importance of surveillance osseous imaging in MM. While an increase in R dose with steroids was associated with an additional 9.5 mos PFS and a total change in regimen with 14.2 mos PFS, those who received an Rd containing triplet had impressive results. In particular, Rd + elotuzumab resulted in a PFS of 40.1 mos. Multivariate analysis accounting for the potential confounding patient and disease factors inherent to treatment selection in retrospective studies will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Cho: BMS: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Employment; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agenus: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Jagannath:Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Medicom: Speakers Bureau; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy. Madduri:Abbvie: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; undation Medicine: Consultancy. Parekh:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Karyopharm Inc.: Research Funding; Foundation Medicine Inc.: Consultancy. Richter:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chari:Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Array Biopharma: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.
Abstract Background High dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) results in cure for up to 50% of patients with Hodgkin (HL) and aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that relapse after initial treatment with chemo-immunotherapy. Despite improvements in supportive care and patient selection, death after ASCT remains a concern due to progressive disease, infection, and other treatment- and non-treatment-related causes. We evaluated causes and predictors of death in patients undergoing ASCT for HL and NHL. Methods We conducted a single-institution, retrospective study of all patients with HL and NHL including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, high grade B-cell lymphoma NOS, follicular lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, and T-Cell lymphoma who underwent ASCT at Emory University between January 1, 2006 and June 1, 2017. We evaluated each patient with regards to pre-transplant disease and other baseline characteristics, treatment response after ASCT, occurrence of relapse post-ASCT, post-ASCT death and cause of death. Among patients who died, we compared baseline characteristics of interest between groups based on the documented cause of death using Fisher's Exact tests and t-tests. The association between cause of death and time to death from ASCT was evaluated by the Kruskal-Wallis test. Box plots were used to describe time to death post-transplant. Results Of 642 patients completing ASCT, 192 died during the period of observation after a median follow-up of 24 months. Among patients who died, the leading causes of death were relapsed disease (n=136, 71%), infection (n=18, 9%), organ dysfunction (n=16, 8%), secondary malignancy (n=8, 4%), and other/unspecified (n-14, 7%). When the group was divided into disease-related (n=136) vs non-disease-related death (n=56), none of the pre-specified variables of interest including age, gender, disease status at transplant, stage, induction or salvage therapy, conditioning regimen, or KPS were significantly associated with disease- vs non-disease-related death. Of the 18 deaths due to infection 7 were due to bacterial sepsis (including 5 prior to day +30 post ASCT), 3 were due to fungal infections, 3 were due to pneumonia, 1 death each was due to hepatitis C, nocardia, pneumocystis jirovecii, cytomegalovirus, and C. Difficile. The median time to death for patients experiencing infection or organ dysfunction was 0.5 years each compared to 1 year for patients dying of disease relapse and 4 years for patients experiencing a secondary malignancy (p<0.001; See Figure). Conclusions Among patients completing ASCT for HL or NHL, most deaths occurred due to relapse of the primary disease. There were no significant associations with baseline or treatment-related variables with the cause of death. The median time to death for patients with infection or organ dysfunction was 0.5 years, suggesting that continued monitoring and supportive care of patients completing ASCT is required beyond the initial engraftment period. Our findings support the role of intensive follow-up during the first year post- ASCT and continued monitoring for long-term toxicities for subsequent years of follow-up. Figure Figure. Disclosures Roberts: AstraZeneca: Consultancy. Flowers:Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: Research Funding; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Burroughs Wellcome Fund: Research Funding; V Foundation: Research Funding; OptumRx: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics/ Janssen: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy; Denovo Biopharma: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Waller:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celldex: Research Funding; Kalytera: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Other: Travel Expenses, EHA, Research Funding; Cambium Medical Technologies: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Lonial:Amgen: Research Funding. Allen:Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy. Blum:Morphosys: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Kaufman:Roche: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Other: data monitoring committee; Abbvie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Nooka:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive technologies: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cohen:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; BioInvent: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BioInvent: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.
