Comparison of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Peripheral Blood and Bone Marrow Based Flow Cytometry for Tracking Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Introduction In multiple myeloma (MM), the absence of measurable residual disease (MRD) after completed therapy is associated with longer progression free survival. Different techniques are available to detect low levels of plasma cells in bone marrow (BM) either by flow cytometry or by next-generation sequencing as a gold standard of molecular methods. But these techniques are limited because they require a representative bone marrow sample obtained by an invasive procedure. Therefore, detecting low levels of disease in blood would be ideal, because serial sampling is much easier and fully representative, and it would allow for the detection of extramedullary disease. Mass spectrometry-based methods have been shown to be more sensitive for detecting monoclonal proteins (M-protein) in serum. In this study, we were motivated to evaluate MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) head-to-head with an established BM-based MRD assays. Patients and Methods This cohort included 71 patients treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) who had serum samples available at 2 timepoints including during active disease and within 60 days of MRD results as determined by flow cytometry of bone marrow aspirates (Flow-BM-MRD). The cohort enrolled 26 females and 45 males with a median age of 61 years (range 37-78 years). Twenty-seven patients had high-risk cytogenetics at baseline. The median time between diagnosis and the MRD timepoint was 13.4 months (3.4-91 months). MALDI-TOF MS analysis was performed according to the method published by Mills et al. Immunoglobulins were purified from serum samples using CaptureSelect beads specific of each isotype and were then eluted from the beads. Light chains and heavy chains were separated by the addition of a reducing agent. Purified samples were mixed in matrix and spotted onto a stainless steel MALDI plate and were analyzed using a Microflex LT MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker). Samples taken during active disease were used to identify the mass to charge ratio (m/z) of the M-protein and served as a surrogate marker in the analysis of subsequent samples. MALDI-TOF MS results were compared to the Flow-BM-MRD assay, performed using the MSKCC's ten-color, single-tube method. Results MALDI-TOF MS detected an M-protein in all 71 active disease samples and in 25 MRD samples. MALDI-TOF-MS results at the MRD timepoint were concordant with Flow-BM-MRD for 44/71 patients (p=0.342, chi-square test). Eight patients were positive and 36 negative by both techniques. Twenty-seven patients were discordant, including 10 patients detectable only by Flow-BM-MRD and 17 detectable only by MALDI-TOF MS. Among the 10 patients detectable by flow cytometry but not by MALDI, the median MRD level was 0.00092% (+<0.0001% - 0.011%). The M-protein could have been present but below the polyclonal background. Regarding the 17 patients positive only by MALDI-TOF-MS, the BM sample for flow analysis was not suitable for 3 patients due to hemodilution. The others 14 samples reached the target of sensitivity with a limit of detection of 0.0001%. Alternatively, the MALDI-TOF result could be a false positive in terms of disease detection. MS is likely not falsely detecting M-proteins and indeed, immunofixation was also positive in 11/17 of these samples. However, low levels of M-protein may not indicate the presence of active disease. Indeed, a confounding factor is that immunoglobulins have a long half-life in serum. To determine the clinical utility of more sensitive M-protein detection, we evaluated the clinical outcome for the 48 newly diagnosed MM patients in CR at the MRD timepoint with a median follow-up of 11 months. Of these 48 patients, 2 of the 3 that were positive by both techniques relapsed during follow-up. One out of 27 patients that were negative by both techniques relapsed. None of the 10 patients who were positive only by MALDI-TOF relapsed and 1 of the 8 patients who were positive only by Flow-BM-MRD relapsed. Conclusions This study is important because it is a first step in understanding how to use a more sensitive blood test for the follow-up of MM patients. MALDI-TOF MS analysis may provide complementary results to Flow-BM-MRD especially for the follow-up of patients in CR and during maintenance therapy to detect poor responders that would be positive by both techniques. In summary, our results suggest that MALDI-TOF may be quite useful for early detection of relapse. Disclosures Roshal: Physicians' Education Resource: Other: Provision of services; Celgene: Other: Provision of Services; Auron Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Other: Provision of services. Hassoun:Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics and Precision Biosciences: Consultancy. Lesokhin:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Genentech: Research Funding; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mailankody:Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Landgren:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Theradex: Other: IDMC; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Other: IDMC; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry in Serum for the Follow-up of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Daratumumab-Based Combination Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128938 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4377-4377

Author(s):

Marion Eveillard ◽

Malin Hultcrantz ◽

Alexander M. Lesokhin ◽

Sham Mailankody ◽

Eric L Smith ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mass Spectrometry ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

M Protein ◽

Light Chains ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Maldi Tof Ms ◽

Maldi Tof ◽

Tof Ms

Introduction Mass spectrometry-based methods have been shown to be more sensitive for detecting monoclonal proteins (M-protein) in serum compared to current electrophoretic techniques, serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and immunofixation (IFE). In particular, MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) may soon replace these techniques for the routine monitoring of multiple myeloma (MM) patients due to its relatively low cost and high throughput. In this study, we evaluate the performance of MALDI-TOF MS in the follow up of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients treated with a daratumumab-based combination therapy. We report our findings compared to SPEP and IFE results and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the technique in the serial analysis of patients. Patients and Methods Twenty-seven NDMM patients treated with daratumumab-based combination therapy were included in this study; median age 57 years (range 33-79 years) and 52% were males. Each patient had 10 time points of follow-up: baseline, day 15 of cycle 1, the first day of each cycle from cycle 2 to cycle 8, and at the end of treatment (EOT). All samples were analyzed in a blinded fashion by MALDI-TOF MS. First, immunoglobulins were purified from serum using magnetic beads specific for IgG and IgA heavy chains or kappa and lambda light chains. Immunoglobulins were eluted from the beads and the light chains and heavy chains were separated by adding a reducing agent. Purified samples were analyzed using a Microflex LT MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker). Samples taken at baseline were used to identify the mass to charge ratio (m/z) of the M-protein which served as a surrogate marker in the analysis of subsequent samples. MALDI-TOF MS results were compared to SPEP, IFE and the kappa/lambda free light chain (κ/λ) ratio. Results At baseline, IFE and MALDI-TOF MS were positive for all 27 patients while SPEP was negative for M-protein in 2 patients. Different M-protein isotypes were observed including 3 free kappa, 1 free lambda, 15 IgG kappa, 3 IgG Lambda, 3 IgA kappa and 2 IgA lambda. The κ/λ ratio was abnormal for 26/27 patients. Twenty-three patients completed the 8 cycles of treatment. During the follow-up, 14 of the 23 patients remained positive until the EOT by MALDI-TOF MS. Regarding these patients, 3 were negative by SPEP and IFE at the EOT. Nine of the 23 patients became negative by MALDI-TOF MS in a median time of 5 cycles (range 2- 8). Among these 9 patients, 1 reached a complete response (CR) and 6 reached stringent CR in a median time of 3 cycles (range cycle 2 - EOT). The 2 patients that did not reach CR but were negative by MALDI are suspected to have a false positive IFE result. These patients' IgG kappa M-protein overlaps with daratumumab on IFE and the Hydrashift assay (Sebia) was unavailable at the time of analysis. In these cases, MALDI provided better specificity compared to IFE as the M-protein could be distinguished from daratumumab based on m/z. However, daratumumab could not always be distinguished from the M-protein at some timepoints for some patients. The patient that still had an abnormal κ/λ ratio but was negative by MALDI had κ light chain MM. MALDI-TOF MS may be less sensitive for the detection of free light chains in serum. We observed differences between the M-spike intensity of the heavy- and light-chain specific purifications especially when the M-protein was at low levels. This may be due to differences in the polyclonal background for each purification reaction and will affect the sensitivity of M-protein detection. Conclusions This study is important because it helps to understand the performance of MALDI-TOF MS in the follow-up of MM patients under therapy. The use of serial samples allowed us to characterize patterns of immune markers longitudinally in relation to given therapy. The m/z ratio at baseline is a key for the interpretation during the follow-up and to avoid interference with other monoclonal immunoglobulins, like daratumumab, for example. When more than one monoclonal immunoglobulin is present, their relative concentration, not just their m/z values, is important for distinguishing two different peaks. MALDI-TOF MS is useful for monitoring patients under therapy because it provides higher specificity and sensitivity than electrophoretic methods. This may be especially important in clinical trials and in accurately defining CR and sCR. Disclosures Lesokhin: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mailankody:Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria; Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics and Precision Biosciences: Consultancy. Hassoun:Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding. Landgren:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Theradex: Other: IDMC; Merck: Other: IDMC; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Bone Marrow-Based and Longitudinal Blood-Based MRD Tracking in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Daratumumab, Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (DKRd): A Correlative and Clinical Phase II Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114311 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3281-3281 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Ola Landgren ◽

Katie Thoren ◽

Malin Hultcrantz ◽

Alexander M. Lesokhin ◽

Nikoletta Lendvai ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Research Funding ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Single Tube ◽

Maldi Tof Ms ◽

Maldi Tof ◽

Tof Ms

Abstract INTRODUCTION Using Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (KRd) combination therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients lead to ~40% minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate. Here, we use KRd in combination with daratumumab (DKRd); and treatment response is assessed with extensive correlative science including parallel bone-marrow-based and blood-based MRD tracking, together with targeted DNA sequencing of baseline bone marrow samples. Primary end-point is to rule out 60% and to target up to 80% MRD negativity rate. METHODS This is a single-arm, Phase II clinical trial based on Simon's optimal two-stage design. The first cohort (twice-a-week carfilzomib) (N=41) has the following treatment schedule: 8 cycles of treatment; 28-day cycles with carfilzomib 20/36 mg/m2 days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16; lenalidomide 25 mg days 1-21; dexamethasone 40 mg weekly cycles 1-4, 20 mg after cycle 4; and daratumumab 16 mg/kg days 1, 8, 15, and 22 cycles 1-2, days 1 and 15 cycles 3-6, and day 1 cycles 7-8. The second cohort (once-a-week carfilzomib) (N=41): 8 cycles of treatment; 28-day cycles with carfilzomib 20/56 mg/m2 days 1, 8, and 15; lenalidomide, dexamethasone, and daratumumab are given at the same doses/schedules as the first cohort. For fit patients, stemcell collection is recommended after 4 to 6 cycles of therapy; DKRd therapy is resumed after collection to a total of 8 cycles DKRd. Treatment response is being assessed with parallel bone-marrow-based (10-color single tube flowcytometry, invivoscribe V(D)J sequencing) as well as blood-based (MALDI-TOF and QTOF-mass spectrometry [MS]) for MRD tracking. Baseline bone marrow samples are evaluated with targeted DNA sequencing for FISH-Seq and somatic mutational characteristics (myTYPE). Here, we present the first stage (N=28) of the first cohort (twice-a-week carfilzomib). We are waiting for the results to mature before the second stage (N=13) of the first cohort can open. The second cohort (once-a-week carfilzomib) is opening for enrollment in August 2018 (N=41). RESULTS The first stage of the first cohort is fully enrolled; 28 patients meeting eligibility criteria were enrolled onto study (14 males, 14 females) between October 2017 and July 2018. Baseline characteristics include; median age 60 years (range 32-80 years); 12(43%) patients had high-risk FISH/SNP signature defined as one or more of the following: 1q+, t(4,14), t(14,16), t(14,20), and 17p-. At the submission of this abstract, 20 patients have completed one or more cycles DKRd; among these, 3 patients have completed all 8 cycles. The median number of cycles delivered is currently 4 (range 1-8). Full assessments with MRD assays have been completed in 3 patients: -Pt #1 obtained complete response (CR) after 3 cycles, and workup after the last cycle of therapy showed MRD-negativity (by 10-color single tube flowcytometry and V(D)J sequencing) in the bone marrow; and peripheral blood (serum) was negative by MALDI-TOF MS after completion of cycle 2. -Pt#2 obtained CR after 4 cycles, however, workup after cycle 5 showed MRD-positivity (by 10-color single tube flowcytometry and V(D)J sequencing) in the bone marrow; and peripheral blood (serum) was positive by MALDI-TOF MS throughout the end of the last cycle. -Pt#3 obtained CR after 4 cycles and after 6 cycles both 10-color single tube flowcytometry and V(D)J sequencing showed MRD-negativity in the bone marrow. However, MALDI-TOF MS detected small abnormal serum proteins in peripheral blood and remained positive throughout the end of cycle 8. Overall, the DKRd therapy is well tolerated and it has similar toxicity profile as KRd. Grade >3 adverse events were hypotension, musculoskeletal deformity, back pain, dyspnea, lung-infection, and febrile neutropenia. So far, 5 patients underwent dose reductions of lenalidomide. CONCLUSIONS In this pre-planned interim analysis of our phase II study, we show that DKRd is a highly effective and well tolerated combination therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Based on small numbers of patients who have completed the planned DKRd cycles and been evaluated by bone marrow-based MRD and peripheral-blood based assays, we show that highly sensitive protein assays may allow longitudinal MRD tracking in peripheral-blood. At the meeting, we will present updated results using longitudinal testing with MALDI TOF-MS and QTOF-MS on the entire cohort. Disclosures Landgren: Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lesokhin:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Serametrix, inc.: Patents & Royalties: Royalties. Mailankody:Juno: Research Funding; Physician Education Resource: Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: CAR T cell therapies for MM, Research Funding. Hassoun:Oncopeptides AB: Research Funding. Shah:Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Arcila:Invivoscribe, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Ho:Invivoscribe, Inc.: Honoraria. Korde:Amgen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Observational Prospective Registry for the Assessment of the Clinical Impact of Starting Anti-Myeloma Treatment at Biological Relapse

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4765.4765 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4765-4765

Author(s):

Adrian Alegre ◽

Merche Gironella ◽

Juan Miguel Bergua ◽

Esther Gonzalez ◽

Fernando Escalante ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Marrow Transplant ◽

Clinical Relapse ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Introduction: Despite the great medical advances associated with the introduction of thalidomide, bortezomib (BORT), and lenalidomide (LEN) for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), it remains an incurable disease. Most patients (pts) show disease progression, consistent with the clinical evolution of MM, and only a low percentage achieve long-term responses and extended progression-free survival (PFS). The heterogeneous nature of MM in both the clinical and biological setting is reflected in the heterogeneity of MM relapses. The International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel (Rajkumar, Blood 2011) states that treatment (Tx) shall begin either at clinical relapse with symptoms (clinR), or in the event of asymptomatic relapse with significant paraprotein relapse, biological relapse (BR). The purpose of this Spanish registry is to describe MM relapse patterns comparing the impact of Tx decisions in pts who meet the criteria for biological relapse (BR) according to IMWG criteria with those in whom Tx was delayed until clinical relapse (clinR). Here, the preliminary results of this study are presented. Methods: MM pts in (or previous to) first or second BR who have achieved ≥ PR since their last Tx are eligible for inclusion in this observational prospective registry at the time BR is detected. Evaluations performed at least bi-monthly are mandatory. A total of 41 Spanish sites participated in the registry following approval from their independent ethics committees, with 410 pts expected to be included, without physician’s decision of prescribing Tx affecting the inclusion. The main objective of the registry is to assess the time to progression (TTP) from the start of anti-MM Tx at the onset of asymptomatic BR vs. the start of Tx at the time of clinR. Secondary objectives are to describe demographics of BR; to assess the median time elapsing from BR to clinR; to assess overall response rate (ORR), event-free survival (EFS), PFS, overall survival (OS) at BR and at clinR (if appropriate); to asses safety and quality of life (QoL) using 2 validated questionnaires (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY24); to document the tolerability profile of the Tx; and to describe the use of associated resources. Here, we summarize baseline characteristics and preliminary results from 83 pts (out of 126 registered pts) who had basal data in the registry at the time of this report. Results: Overall, 79% of pts presented with a BR and 21% were in a bi-monthly watchful waiting follow up. The mean age of pts was 67 years, 53% were female, 57% were in first relapse, 43% and 27% had an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 and 1, respectively, while the ECOG PS was unknown in 30% of pts at the time of this report. In total, 30% of pts had ISS stage I, 26% had ISS stage II, and 22% had ISS stage III, while ISS stage data were not available or unknown for 12% and 10% of pts, respectively. MM types were IgG Κ (37% of pts), IgG λ (23%), IgA Κ (13%), IgA λ (9%), and type was unknown in 17% of pts. 28% of IgG/IgA MM types were Bence-Jones. Cytogenetic risk assessments were available in 66% of pts. Among those pts with a BR, 51% received active Tx without waiting for a ClinR. First-line Tx was BORT-based in 70% of pts. Overall, 55% of pts had undergone autologous stem cell transplantation, 15% had received consolidation Tx and 34% had received maintenance Tx. After first-line Tx, 17% of pts achieved a stringent complete response (sCR), 31% achieved a CR, 24% achieved a very good partial response (VGPR), and 10% achieved a PR. The median time to BR was 24.53 months. Most (63%) pts who registered after second relapse received LEN-based Tx. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study in MM to evaluate BR as well as the effects of Tx based on the decision to start Tx at BR vs. clinR. In this preliminary cohort, the physicians’ decision to start active Tx at BR, before the onset of clinR in 50% of cases, was noteworthy. Further follow-up is needed to identify the differences between these two strategies. Updated clinical results will be presented at the meeting. MM-BR Study, Spanish Myeloma Group-GEM/PETHEMA Bibliography Alegre A, et al. Haematologica. 2002;87:609-14. Brioli A, et al. Blood. 2014;123:3414-9. Fernández de Larrea C, et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49:223-7. Lenhoff S, et al. Haematologica. 2006;91:1228-33. Rajkumar SV, et al. Blood. 2011;117:4691-5. Zamarin D, et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:419-24. Disclosures Alegre: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lahuerta:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ruiz:Celgene: Celgene Stock options as part of the employee's compensation plan Other, Employment. Vilanova:Celgene: Contracted by Celgene Other.

Download Full-text

Tracking Daratumumab Clearance Using Mass Spectrometric Approaches: Implications on M Protein Monitoring and Reusing Daratumumab

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153209 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2707-2707

Author(s):

Nadine Abdallah ◽

David L Murray ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Prashant Kapoor ◽

Morie A. Gertz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Plasma Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

M Protein ◽

Urine Protein ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Plasma Cell Disorders

Abstract Background: MASS-FIX is a screening method for serum and urine monoclonal proteins in multiple myeloma and related plasma cell disorders, which uses immunoglobulin enrichment coupled with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass-spectrometry (MALDI-TOF). In addition to superior sensitivity over conventional gel-based techniques, MASS-FIX can distinguish therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) from patient's M protein. As the utilization of therapeutic MoAbs increases, it is essential to understand the persistence pattern of these therapeutic antibodies in the serum. We designed this study to evaluate the duration of daratumumab detection by MASS-FIX in the serum of treated patients. Methods: We used a prospectively maintained database at Mayo clinic to identify patients with multiple myeloma and related plasma cell disorders who were treated with a daratumumab-containing regimen anytime during their disease course and had serial MASS-FIX data available after discontinuation of daratumumab. A univariate analysis was performed to assess for factors that may impact the clearance of daratumumab. Results: We included 125 patients with plasma cell disorders who received daratumumab as first or subsequent line of treatment between March 15 th, 2016, and March 4 th, 2020. The median age was 60.2 years and 57% were male. The most common diagnoses were multiple myeloma (70%) and light chain amyloidosis (18%). Daratumumab-based treatments were initiated after a median of 28.8 (IQR: 6.4-76.3) months from initial diagnosis. The most common regimen used was daratumumab, bortezomib and dexamethasone (23%); 26% underwent transplant after daratumumab-based induction. The median duration of treatment with a daratumumab-based regimen was 208 (IQR: 99-479) days. The median follow-up from the time of daratumumab discontinuation was 457 (95% CI: 346-NR) days. By last follow up, daratumumab was not detected by MASS-FIX in 93 (74%) patients but remained detectable in 32 (26%) patients. The median time from daratumumab discontinuation to disappearance of daratumumab by MASS-FIX was 160 (IQR: 107-233) days. On univariate analysis, the presence of ≥0.5 grams of urine protein was associated with earlier disappearance of daratumumab on MASS-FIX [risk ratio (RR): 2.0, P=0.02). The median time from daratumumab discontinuation to disappearance of daratumumab on MASS-FIX was 116 (95%CI: 76-160) days in patients with urine protein ≥0.5 grams and 203 (95%CI: 162-216) days in patients with urine protein <0.5 grams (P=0.02). There was no association between the time to disappearance of daratumumab by MASS-FIX and old age ≥70 (RR: 0.9, P=0.81], male gender (RR: 0.9, P=0.60), eGFR <60 (RR: 1.0, P=0.98), daratumumab schedule (every 1/2 weeks vs >2weeks) (RR: 1.0, P=0.97), treatment duration (<200 days vs ≥200 days) ( RR: 1.0, P=0.95), or transplantation status (RR: 1.0, P=0.98). Conclusion: The therapeutic monoclonal antibody daratumumab remains detectable in the serum of treated patients by MASS-FIX for several months after discontinuation and the duration varies between individual patients. This data has implications for diagnostic and monitoring testing and may provide guidance for reuse of daratumumab in clinical trials and practice. Proteinuria is associated with earlier disappearance of daratumumab by MASS-FIX and may have implications in patients with amyloidosis and monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease (MIDD). Further studies are needed to identify additional factors associated with the timing of disappearance. Disclosures Murray: Mayo Clinic: Other: Has received patents for the Mass-Fix technology which has been licensed to the Binding Site with potential royalties.. Dispenzieri: Takeda: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Sorrento Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kapoor: Karyopharm: Consultancy; Cellectar: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Ichnos Sciences: Research Funding; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Glaxo SmithKline: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Gertz: Akcea Therapeutics, Ambry Genetics, Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Janssen Biotech Inc, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Pfizer Inc (to Institution), Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria; Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board; Akcea Therapeutics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc, Prothena: Consultancy; Aurora Biopharma: Other: Stock option; AbbVie Inc, Celgene Corporation: Other: Data Safetly & Monitoring. Dingli: Alexion: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Apellis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy. Kumar: Antengene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Roche-Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Carsgen: Research Funding; Tenebio: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of Romiplostim in over 200 Children with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): Results of an Integrated Database of 5 Clinical Trials

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-109763 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2428-2428 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Michael D. Tarantino ◽

Jenny M. Despotovic ◽

John Roy ◽

John Grainger ◽

Nichola Cooper ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Platelet Count ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Platelet Response ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Baseline Platelet Count ◽

Platelet Counts

Abstract Background: Romiplostim is approved globally for use in adults with ITP and in the EU for children with ITP. More comprehensive data are needed on the use of romiplostim in children with ITP. Objective: To examine the safety and efficacy of romiplostim in trials in children with ITP. Methods: Data were combined from 5 romiplostim trials in children with ITP, both placebo-controlled (a phase 1/2 and a phase 3 trial) and open-label (a 3-year trial and 2 extension trials); trial data have been reported previously (Bussel Blood 2011, Bussel PBC 2014, Tarantino Lancet 2016, Tarantino ASH 2017, Grainger ASH 2017). Platelet counts in the 4 weeks after use of rescue medication were excluded from analyses. Descriptive statistics were used. Number (n), mean, standard deviation (SD), median, quartile range (Q1, Q3), minimum (min), and maximum (max) for continuous variables, and number and percentage for categorical variables were provided. Results: Patients (N=286, 24 initially placebo and 262 initially romiplostim) had median (Q1, Q3) age of 10 (6, 13) years, ITP duration of 1.9 (1, 4) years, and baseline platelet count of 14 (8, 23)×109/L. Previously, 88% had received corticosteroids, 87% IVIg, and 21% rituximab; 23% had received >3 prior treatments and 7% had prior splenectomy. Of the 282 patients exposed to romiplostim (20 initially received placebo), the median (min, max) duration of treatment was 65 (8, 471) weeks, with a median (min, max) average weekly dose of 6.6 (0.1, 9.7) μg/kg; total exposure was 468 patient-years. The most common reasons for discontinuing the parent study for romiplostim-treated patients were per protocol (19%; eg, sponsor decision, death, lost to follow-up), consent withdrawn (3%), noncompliance (1%), and administrative decision (1%). Of romiplostim-treated patients, 24% had serious adverse events (SAEs), most commonly epistaxis, low platelet counts, and headache (Table). There were 7 cases of postbaseline neutralizing antibody against romiplostim: 2 transient and 5 persistent. There were no neutralizing antibodies against endogenous TPO. For patients undergoing bone marrow biopsies in the 3-year open-label trial, there were no findings of collagen or bone marrow abnormalities (Year 1 n=27, Year 2 n=5, vs. baseline) (Grainger et al, ASH 2017). One patient had an increase in modified Bauermeister bone marrow grade from 0 to 2 (fine reticulin fiber network) with no associated AEs (the only AEs were a cold and injection site pain); per protocol, there was no follow-up biopsy. Once at a steady dose of 10 μg/kg, most (11/16) of this patient's platelet counts were ≥30×109/L. Investigators reported thrombocytosis AEs; 1 patient had a platelet count of 1462×109/L at Week 14 for 1 week and another had elevated platelet counts 10 times between Weeks 20-172 (max of 872×109/L); there were no associated thrombotic events. Median platelet counts rose quickly and were over 50×109/L from Week 12 on (Figure). Platelet response rates also rose quickly. Overall, 89% of romiplostim-treated patients (vs 8% of placebo) had a platelet response (platelet counts ≥50×109/L; Figure). For romiplostim-treated patients, the first platelet responses occurred after a median of 6 weeks. The median % (Q1, Q3) of months responding was 76% (25%, 93%) and # of months responding was 11 (3, 20); from time of first monthly response, the median (Q1, Q3) % of months responding was 92% (75%, 100%) and # of months responding was 14 (7, 23). Nineteen romiplostim-treated patients discontinued all ITP therapies including romiplostim for ≥6 months while maintaining platelet counts ≥50×109/L (here defined as remission). These treatment-free periods lasted a median (Q1, Q3) of 12 (8, 14) months; no placebo patients remained free of treatment. There were no clear differences between those who did and did not enter remission (ie, age, sex, race, past treatment, ITP duration, baseline platelet count). Bleeding was reported for most (68%) patients: mostly grade 1/2, with 10% having grade 3 bleeding (most commonly epistaxis in 13 patients) and 2 patients having grade 4 bleeding (both reported as "ITP"). Conclusions: In this comprehensive database of romiplostim ITP trials in 286 children with 468 patient-years of romiplostim exposure, romiplostim was well tolerated. With romiplostim, the vast majority (89%) of patients had a platelet response, with some children able to discontinue all ITP treatments for ≥6 months. Disclosures Tarantino: Health Resources and Services Administration: Research Funding; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Other: Reviews grants; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Grifols: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Despotovic:AmGen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Grainger:Biotest: Consultancy; Ono Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational grant; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cooper:Amgen, Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kim:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Eisen:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

A Retrospective Multicenter Case Study Evaluating the Characteristics, Management and Outcome of Acquired Amegakaryocytic Thrombocytopenia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153388 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3167-3167

Author(s):

Anais Roeser ◽

Guillaume Moulis ◽

Mikael Ebbo ◽

Louis Terriou ◽

Elsa Poullot ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Platelet Count ◽

Aplastic Anemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Bone Marrow Biopsy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Overall Response ◽

Acquired Amegakaryocytic Thrombocytopenia

Abstract Introduction Acquired amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia (AAT) is an extremely rare disease characterized by acquired megakaryocytic aplasia or hypoplasia with no other lineage abnormalities. Given limited evidence, the first aim of this study was to describe the characteristics, management and outcome of patients with AAT, the second aim was to examine the therapeutic response through a systematic review of published case reports. Patients and Methods We carried out a retrospective multicenter study through the French Reference Network for Adult Autoimmune Cytopenias, including patients aged > 18 years with acquired thrombocytopenia with a platelet count < 50 x 10 9/L, associated with a megakaryocytes / granulocytes ratio < 50 % on bone marrow, diagnosed from July 2007 to February 2020. Exclusion criteria were: abnormal granular lineage, evidence of dysplasia, bone marrow infiltration by tumor cells or hematologic malignancy, significant karyotype abnormality, and significant paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria clone. Bone marrow biopsy were centrally reviewed. Patients' medical charts were collected using the standardized form of the referral center for adult immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Response to treatment was defined according to standardized international criteria for ITP: response (R) and complete response (CR) were respectively defined as platelet count of > 30 × 10 9/L with at least a doubling of the baseline value, and platelet count of > 100 × 10 9/L ; overall response as either R or CR. We performed a systematic review conducted through Medline and Scopus databases from 1970 to April 2021. Cases were included in the analysis if initial platelet count was < 50 x 10 9/L and bone marrow examination was available, demonstrating a megakaryocyte hypoplasia or aplasia with no alternate diagnosis. Results We screened 23 patients reported as thrombocytopenia with absence or decreased megakaryocytes. Eleven patients were excluded because of: presence of megakaryocytes on bone marrow biopsy despite megakaryocytic aplasia on bone marrow aspirate (n=2), absence of bone marrow biopsy (n=4), aplastic or hypoplastic bone marrow (n=3), moderate thrombocytopenia > 50 x 10 9/L (n=1), lack of data (n=1). Twelve patients were included in the analysis. AAT patients had a median age of 52.5 years, 5/12 (41.7%) were female, 6/12 (50%) had a preexisting autoimmune disease (Table 1). All bone marrow biopsies reviewed to date contained CD8+ T-cell infiltrates. Eight patients received a first line treatment with corticosteroids and/or intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), a single response was observed. Ten patients received cyclosporine in monotherapy resulting in 4CR, and 1R or in combination with diverse agents with heterogenous responses. Six had received a single therapy with thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) inducing 4 CR. Eventually, 9 patients (75%) achieved a CR under therapy, obtained with ciclosporin alone in 3 cases, ciclosporin in association with TPO-RA or ATG in 2 cases, cyclophosphamide followed-up by mycophenolate mofetil in 1 case, and TPO-RAs alone in 4 patients (of whom 3 had previously received at least on immunosuppressive therapy). After a median follow up time of 4.0 years (range 1.2 - 11.9), 2 (16%) patients eventually developed an aplastic anemia, 7 and 41.5 months respectively after initial AAT diagnosis. The literature search yielded 108 articles, of which 75 articles reporting 85 cases were included in the final analysis. The pooled analysis of newly reported and historic cases included 97 cases. Overall response rates to corticosteroids and IVIg were respectively 22.4 % and 5.3 % (Table 2). Ciclosporin was used as single agent in 37.1 % of patients, with an overall response rate of 66.7 %. TPO-RAs were used in 9 cases, with a CR in 7 patients (77.8%). Overall, 9/97 patients (9.3 %) experienced an aplastic anemia during the follow-up. The presence of a thymoma was associated with a higher risk of aplastic anemia (OR 6.83 (95%CI 1.22-34.00, p=0.020)). Conclusion Distinguishing AAT from ITP is of significance as the outcome and response to therapy strongly differ. Aplastic anemia may occur in the follow-up but remain rare. Corticosteroids and IVIg are inefficient in most cases, ciclosporin appear to be very effective, TPO-RA could also be an option, as single therapy or in associations. Further data will be needed to define the respective place of these treatments. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Moulis: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Argenix: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ebbo: Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Other: Attendance Grant; Amgen: Honoraria; Sobi: Other: Attendance Grant; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Terriou: Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Haioun: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Miltenyi: Honoraria, Research Funding. Michel: Amgen,Novartis,UCB,Argenx,Rigel: Honoraria. Godeau: Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Grifols: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy. Mahevas: GSK: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Phase II Trial of Single Agent Panobinostat (LBH589) In Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.3952.3952 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 3952-3952 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Irene Ghobrial ◽

Tiffany Poon ◽

Meghan Rourke ◽

Stacey Chuma ◽

Janet Kunsman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Stable Disease ◽

Research Funding ◽

Bone Marrow Involvement ◽

Ct Scans ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Bone Marrow Biopsies ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3952 Introduction: This study aimed to determine the safety and activity of panobinostat (LBH589) in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM). This was based on our preclinical studies showing that panobinostat induces significant activity in cell lines and patient samples. Methods: Eligibility criteria include: 1) patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory WM with any prior lines of therapy, 2) measurable disease and symptomatic disease, 3) off prior chemotherapy> 3 weeks, or biological/novel therapy for WM > 2 weeks. Patients received panobinostat at 30 mg three times a week (Mondays, Wed and Fridays). Patients were assessed after every cycle for the first 6 cycles and then every 3 months thereafter. Subjects who had response or stable disease were allowed to continue on therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. A planned restaging was performed at the end of cycle 6 including CT scans and bone marrow biopsies. Results: Twenty-seven patients have been enrolled to date. The median age is 62 years (47-80), the median lines of prior therapy is 3 (range, 1–7). All of the patients received prior rituximab. The median hemoglobin at screening is 10.3 g/dL (range 8.2–14.3), the median IgM M-spike by protein electropheresis at study entry is 1.9 g/dL (range, 0.63–5.1), and median serum IgM at baseline is 3610 mg/dL (range, 804- 10, 300). The median bone marrow involvement at enrollment was high for patients with WM, 50%, range (5-95%), with more than 10 patients having 70% or higher bone marrow involvement at baseline. The median number of cycles on therapy is 4 (range 1 – 12). 4 of the patients came off due to toxicity. Minimal response (MR) or better has been achieved in 15 (60%) of patients, with 6 (24%) PR, 9 (36%) MR. In addition, 9 (36%) patients achieved stable disease and 1 (4%) showed progression. The median decrease in IgM is 1020 mg/dL (0- 3970 decrease in IgM) with a median % decrease of 37.13%. Responses were prompt. The median time to first response was 2 cycles (range, 2–4). Bone marrow biopsies at the end of study (or at 6 months follow up) are available on 7 patients, of which 3 showed a significant decrease in bone marrow involvement and 4 showed stable involvement. The 4 patients who had stable bone marrow disease showed 1 PR and 3 MR responses by paraprotein level. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities include 4 (15%) cases of anemia including 1 case of hemolytic anemia, 1 (3%) case of grade 4 leucopenia (but the patient had grade 3 leucopenia at baseline), 7 (26%) of neutropenia, 14 (52%) of thrombocytopenia, 1 (4%) grade 3 GI bleed due to thrombocytopenia, 1 (3%) Grade 4 hyperglycemia and 1 (3%) grade 3 syncope and 3 (27%) grade 3 fatigue. The most common grade 2 toxicities were thrombocytopenia, anemia, and fatigue. There were 5 (20%) cases of asymptomatic pulmonary infiltrates of ground glass opacity observed on routine CT scans in follow up. Of these, 3 came off study for other reasons not related to the pulmonary infiltrates, 1 received a course of corticosteroids and had improvement of infiltrates, and 1 had dose reduction of therapy. All patients except for 2 have been dose reduced due to thrombocytopenia, fatigue, diarrhea, or anemia. Dose reductions include 25 mg three times a week, 20 mg three times a week and 20 mg three times every other week. The protocol was amended to allow a starting dose of 25 mg three times a week, which is better tolerated than 30 mg in this patient population. Conclusions: Panobinostat is an active therapeutic agent in patients with relapsed or refractory WM, with an overall response rate of 60% in patients with relapsed or refractory WM. The dose schedule of 25 mg three times a week is better tolerated in this patient population. Further studies to include this agent in combination with rituximab or bortezomib are being evaluated. Disclosures: Ghobrial: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Anderson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Richardson:Keryx Biopharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Treon:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Genentech BiOncology, Biogen IDEC, Celgene, Novartis, Cephalon: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Novartis Corporation: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

EBMT Risk Score for Pre Transplant Risk Assessment in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.3094.3094 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 3094-3094 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Zartash Gul ◽

Hasan Khan ◽

Qaiser Bashir ◽

Nina Shah ◽

Simrit Parmar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Risk Score ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

All Cause Mortality ◽

Response Status

Abstract Abstract 3094 Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) but its use is limited by high non-relapse mortality (NRM). European Group for Bone Marrow transplant (EBMT) risk score is a validated predictor of outcome for patients undergoing allo-HCT for hematological malignancies. It takes into consideration patient's age, donor's gender and type, disease status and the interval from diagnosis to allo-HCT, with the score ranging from 0 to 7. We assessed the impact of EBMT risk score in MM patients undergoing allo-HCT. Methods: A total of 189 patients with MM who underwent HSCT between November 1985 and June 2010 at MD Anderson Cancer Center were included in the analysis. Results: Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. There were 110 males (58%) and 79 females (42%) with a mean age of 50 years (range 28–70). Donors were related in 146 patients (HLA-identical=131, 1 antigen mismatched (AGMM) = 5, 2 AGMM =1, 3AGMM=1, syngeneic=8) and unrelated in 43 patients (HLA identical= 37, 1AGMM=4, 2AGMM=1, unknown=1). One-hundred and twelve patients had prior autologous transplants (auto-HCT). Of these 83 had 1, 28 had 2 and 1 had 3 prior auto-HCT, respectively. Median time from diagnosis to allo-HCT was 24.7 months (range 3.3–232) and median overall follow up was 13 months (0.2–266). Overall 94 patients (49%) had progressed before last follow-up. Incidence of all-cause mortality was 138 (73.4%) with 69 (36%) of all deaths attributed to NRM. KM estimates of 2-year PFS and OS were 25% and 42%, and 5-year PFS and OS were 16% and 27%, respectively. Cumulative incidence (CI) of grade 2–4 and grade 3–4 acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) was 33% and 13%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of overall and extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 47% and 17%, respectively. EBMT risk score was, 0–3 for 41 (21.7%), 4 for 72 (38.1%) 4 and 5–7 for 76 (40.2%) patients. EBMT risk score was higher for males, African-Americans and older allo-HCT recipients, patients with higher LDH levels (>618mg/dl), ß2-microglobulin >3.5mg/dl and patients with bone marrow plasmacytosis. Median PFS in patients with EBMT scores 0–3, 4 and 5–7 were 10.1, 8.4 and 6.4 months, respectively (P=0.0036). Median OS in patients with EBMT scores 0–3, 4 and 5–7 were 39, 15.8 and 9.6 months, respectively (p=0.001). Cumulative NRM in patients with EBMT scores 0–3, 4 and 5–7 were 37% (15/41), 36.1% (26/72) and 37.3% (28/75), respectively (p= 0.234). Cumulative incidence of progression in patients with EBMT scores 0–3, 4 and 5–7 were 36.5% (15/41), 50% (36/72) and 56.5% (43/76), p=0.119. Compared to those with EBMT risk score (0–3), individuals with EBMT risk scores >5 had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.44–3.80), and disease progression (HR 3.06, 95% CI 1.67–5.61). Addition of ß2-microglobulin, BM plasma cells or prior response status alone or in combination with EBMT risk score significantly improved the discrimination properties of the model containing EBMT score alone (p<0.05). Conclusions: EBMT risk score is an independent predictor of survival in MM patients undergoing allo-HCT. Addition of myeloma-specific factors predictors (ß2-microglobulin, plasma cell infiltration and prior response status) to EBMT score significantly improves its prognostic impact. Disclosures: Giralt: Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Eculizumab Protects Against TE and Prolongs Survival in Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria: An International PNH Registry Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.3480.3480 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 3480-3480

Author(s):

Gérard Socié ◽

Hubert Schrezenmeier ◽

Petra Muus ◽

Jeffrey Szer ◽

Alvaro Urbano-Ispizua ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Significant Protective Effect ◽

Rbc Transfusion

Abstract Abstract 3480 Background: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a chronic and life-threatening hematopoietic stem cell disorder characterized by uncontrolled complement-mediated hemolysis. PNH, in large part due to chronic hemolysis and platelet hyperactivation, is associated with thromboembolism (TE), one of the leading causes of disease mortality. Eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits terminal complement activation, has been shown in clinical trials to reduce hemolysis and the incidence of TE. The International PNH Registry provides the opportunity to understand from real world experience the impact of eculizumab on TE reduction in PNH patients. Aim: To assess the risk factors for TE and mortality in PNH patients enrolled in the Registry and to assess the effectiveness of eculizumab in reducing PNH-associated TEs. Methods: Patients are eligible for the Registry if they have a detectable PNH clone, regardless of disease severity, comorbidities, or treatments (past, current or planned). As of June 30, 2012, there were 1547 patients enrolled from 25 countries on 5 continents. Patients were excluded from analysis if they were missing key demographic variables or dates of eculizumab use, or did not yet have follow-up information. The cumulative incidence of TE was determined using competing risks methods to take into account bone marrow transplantation and death, while Kaplan-Meier methods were used for the cumulative incidence of mortality. Risk factors for TE and mortality were explored using a Cox proportional hazards model with stepwise selection (the significance level was relaxed to P=0.20 due to the small number of events for analysis). Variables examined in the models included: ethnicity; prior TEs, bone marrow disorders, impaired renal function, impaired hepatic function (IHF), abdominal pain, dysphagia, dyspnea, easy bruising/bleeding, fatigue, headache, hemoglobinuria, Karnofsky performance score, granulocyte clone size and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) at enrollment, red blood cell (RBC) transfusions 6 months prior to enrollment as a marker for hemolysis, and treatments after enrollment (eculizumab and warfarin/heparin). Results: The mean age of the 1047 patients eligible for analysis was 45 years; 537 patients (51.3%) were female and 868 were Caucasian (82.9%). Anti-coagulants (heparin/warfarin) were used by 28% of patients and eculizumab was used by 51% during follow-up (18% used both). During a mean (SD) follow-up of 22.5 (18.4) months, 16 patients had a TE and 51 were deceased. Patients taking eculizumab during follow-up had a cumulative incidence of TE at 1 year of 0.41% and 1.35% at 2 years, while patients not taking eculizumab had TE incidence of 1.70% and 2.61% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. In the multivariate Cox model, the greatest associations with TE were RBC transfusions in the 6 months before enrollment (hazard ratio [HR]=9.61), history of IHF (HR=4.78), dyspnea (HR=2.42) and headache (HR=2.33) at enrollment. While controlling for these variables, eculizumab had a significant protective effect (HR=0.23, 95% CI = 0.08–0.66). The cumulative incidence of mortality in eculizumab-treated patients was 2.31% and 4.21% at 1 and 2 years, while in untreated patients it was 4.40% and 7.01%, respectively. In the multivariate model of mortality, the greatest associations were age 60+ years (HR=4.72), Karnofsky score <80 (HR=2.34), fatigue at enrollment (HR=1.94), and recent RBC transfusion (HR=1.75). While controlling for these variable, eculizumab had a significant protective effect (HR=0.41, 95% CI = 0.23–0.73). Conclusions: This analysis of a large international cohort of ‘real world’ patients with PNH showed that eculizumab is associated with a significantly reduced risk of TE and mortality, consistent with prior research. Recent RBC transfusion, a surrogate marker for hemolysis, was associated with increased risk of TE and mortality. Several symptoms and hepatic dysfunction also showed increased risks for these outcomes. As might be expected, older age and low performance status were associated with mortality. These data should be interpreted within the context of a contemporary cohort of PNH patients who may or may not be treated (with either eculizumab and/or anticoagulation). These analyses are limited due to small number of TE and mortality outcomes. Disclosures: Muus: Alexion Pharmaceuticals : Sat on advisory board of Alexion Pharmaceuticals. Other. Urbano-Ispizua:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maciejewski:NIH: Research Funding; Aplastic Anemia&MDS International Foundation: Research Funding. Kanakura:Shire: Consultancy. Rosse:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Khursigara:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Employment. Bedrosian:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hillmen:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Detailed Safety Analysis of Venetoclax Combined with Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2033.2033 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2033-2033 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Danielle M. Brander ◽

Michael Y. Choi ◽

Andrew W. Roberts ◽

Shuo Ma ◽

L. Leanne Lash ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Over Time

Abstract Background: Venetoclax (VEN) is a selective, potent, orally bioavailable BCL-2 inhibitor FDA-approved for patients with del(17p) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and who have received ≥1 prior therapy. Based on preclinical evidence of synergy, VEN plus rituximab is being assessed in an ongoing Phase 1b study. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL received daily VEN with stepwise ramp-up over 3-4 weeks to reach daily doses of 200-600mg. After 1 week at the target dose, monthly rituximab was added for 6 doses. Responses and progression were assessed by iwCLL criteria with CT scan and bone marrow biopsy. Bone marrow assessments were done at screening, completion of combination therapy (month 7), and 2 months after clinical/radiologic criteria of iwCLL response were met. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed in peripheral blood and marrow aspirates using ≥4 color flow cytometry (min sensitivity: 0.01%). Data cutoff was 04March2016, with analysis focusing on updated safety of cytopenias experienced on the course of treatment. Results: Forty-ninepatients enrolled (48 CLL/1 SLL). Patients had received a median of 2 prior therapies (range: 1-5) and disease in 25 (51%) was considered refractory to the most recent therapy. Median time on study was 28 (<1-42) months, with 31 patients active on study. Eighteen patients discontinued: 11 due to disease progression, 3 due to toxicity (peripheral neuropathy [1], MDS [1], and death due to TLS [1]), 3 withdrew consent, and 1 was lost to follow up. Across all doses, the most common AEs of any grade were diarrhea (57%), neutropenia (55%), upper respiratory tract infection (55%), and nausea (51%). Peripheral blood cytopenias were the most common Grade 3/4 AEs (neutropenia [53%], thrombocytopenia [16%], anemia [14%], febrile neutropenia [12%], and leukopenia [12%]). Twenty-seven (55%) patients had a history of neutropenia, of whom 6 were receiving G-CSF support prior to starting VEN. Overall, in the first month of therapy, 15 (31%) experienced an AE of neutropenia (any grade). Thereafter, the rate of new AEs of neutropenia decreased over time. While there was individual patient variability, mean ANC was stable over time. Overall, 26 (53%) patients had Grade 3/4 neutropenia. Neutropenia was generally well tolerated and managed by G-CSF support in 24 patients, in addition to ≥1 dose modification in 11 of the 24 patients. Of 8 (16%) patients who experienced grade 3 infections, 2 were while neutropenic. There were no grade 4 infections. Among the 11 (22%) patients who developed any-grade thrombocytopenia, none occurred within 2 weeks of a reported bleeding-related AE. One patient had thrombocytopenia overlapping with disease progression on therapy. Objective response rate for all patients was 86% (n=42), with 51% (n=25) who had complete response (CR/CRi; 12 achieved CR/CRi by month 7). At the completion of combination therapy (month 7), 39 patients had evaluable bone marrow assessments. Thirty (77%) had no histologic evidence of CLL in the bone marrow and 22 patients (56%) had attained bone marrow MRD-negativity. In longer follow up at any point during treatment for all 49 patients, 37 (75%) patients achieved complete marrow clearance and 28 (57%) achieved marrow MRD-negativity. Conclusions: Transient manageable neutropenia was the most common AE, with first onset usually seen within the first month of treatment and the onset of new neutropenia AEs decreased over time. No patients discontinued the study due to cytopenias. Patients were able to continue on study and high rates of response to treatment were observed. VEN given with rituximab achieved rapid and profound reductions in disease burden in peripheral blood and bone marrow. 77% of evaluable patients achieved morphologic clearance by month 7, and 57% were MRD-negative at any point on study. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Brander: TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria. Roberts:AbbVie: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Genentech: Patents & Royalties: Employee of Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research which receives milestone payments related to venetoclax. Ma:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Xeme: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Lash:AbbVie: Employment. Verdugo:AbbVie: Employment, Other: may own stock. Zhu:AbbVie Inc.: Employment, Other: may own stock. Kim:AbbVie: Employment. Seymour:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text