scholarly journals Is There a Higher Incidence of Graft Failure or Delayed Time to Engraftment in Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Who Receive Olanzapine for Anti-Emetic Prophylaxis?

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4905-4905
Author(s):  
Hannah McNally ◽  
Luke Mountjoy ◽  
Alison Collings

Abstract Olanzapine has been shown to significantly decrease nausea and emetic episodes associated with chemotherapy in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (Monson, Greer, Kreikemeier, & Liewer, 2020). Additionally, Olanzapine has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in autologous stem cell transplant patients when added to triplet anti-emetic therapy of ondansetron, fosaprepitant and dexamethasone without any negative effects on time to engraftment (Clemmons, et al., 2018). Although this study did not show any delay in time to engraftment, there is only a small amount of data looking at this question, including Clemmons et al. (2016) and Trifilio et al. (2017). Other studies (Navari et al., 2016) demonstrated a decrease in chemotherapy related nausea and vomiting in patients receiving Olanzapine, but did not provide data on engraftment times as this was in standard chemotherapy recipients. At Colorado Blood Cancer Institute (CBCI), Olanzapine was used for a period of time for anti-emetic prophylaxis both pre and post autologous stem cell transplant. There was concern regarding whether or not Olanzapine was causing delays in time to engraftment or even potentially graft failure and use of the drug in transplant anti-emetic regimens was discontinued. We hypothesized that Olanzapine does not cause higher incidence of graft failure, as compared to patients who do not receive Olanzapine as part of their anti-emetic regimen during the pre and post autologous stem cell transplant period. A retrospective analysis (n = 272) was conducted on patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplant between 2019 and 2020. 134 of these patients received Olanzapine during conditioning and up until time of engraftment, and 138 patients had no Olanzapine exposure throughout their conditioning and transplant. Conditioning regimens were equal between the two groups (Table 1). The average number of days on Olanzapine was 10.7, and the average dose was 7.5mg daily. For the purposes of this study engraftment was defined as the first day post stem cell infusion that the patient had an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of greater than or equal to 500. Findings showed that the mean day of engraftment in the patients with Olanzapine exposure was 14.69; in the non-Olanzapine group, the mean day of engraftment was 12.64 (Table 2). Using the two-sample t-test, this difference (2.05 days, 95% CI (1.60-2.51)) is significant (p<.0001). Based on our findings, there is evidence to support Olanzapine causing a slightly delayed time to engraftment in autologous stem cell transplant patients, but not a higher incidence of graft failure, although a randomized controlled trial would be needed to fully investigate. There is clear data showing increased ability to manage chemo therapy induced nausea and vomiting. While a randomized controlled trial would be needed to fully investigate, given there is not a proven increase in graft failure, Olanzapine should be considered as a desirable option to treat and prevent chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting in autologous stem cell transplant patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. OffLabel Disclosure: Olanzapine (Zyprexa) - Used off-label for the treatment and prevention of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting

BMC Cancer ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Chamorro-Viña ◽  
Gregory MT Guilcher ◽  
Faisal M Khan ◽  
Karen Mazil ◽  
Fiona Schulte ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21521-e21521
Author(s):  
Nizar Bhulani ◽  
Holly Michelle Holmes ◽  
Robert Morgan

e21521 Background: Increasing number of geriatric patients are now being considered as suitable candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Malnutrition being a common comorbidity in older cancer patients with no gold standard in malnutrition screening tools, it warrants for a better understanding of the health of geriatric cancer patients from a nutrition stand point. This study was pursued to evaluate individual patient parameters to predict malnutrition among elderly stem cell transplant patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on patients eligible for allogeneic HCT at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. Nutrition was assessed using the Mini Nutritional Assessment tool. Individual parameters to predict malnutrition included body mass index of less than 24 and weight loss of more than 3 kgs in the past 3 months. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS, version 23. Results: Mean age of the study participants was 65 years. Majority of the study population had the diagnosis of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) at the time evaluation. The mean BMI of the study participants was 28.91 +- 4.77 while the mean MNA score was 24.95 +- 3.39. There was no association found between patient characteristics and history of weight loss or abnormal BMI. There was a significant association (p < 0.001) found between loss of more than 3 kg weight and an abnormal MNA score. There was no association found between any of the patient characteristics and abnormal BMI with abnormal MNA. The sensitivity of weight loss in comparison with MNA score was 62.5% and the specificity was 91%, thus, having a positive and negative predictive value of 77% and 84% respectively. Given that 86% of our patients were either overweight or obese at the time of evaluation, from those who were under weight, 100% had an abnormal MNA and 50% of normal weight patients had an abnormal MNA. Conclusions: The significant association between weight loss and poor MNA status shows that we are moving in the right direction to provide answers to nutrition status using individual patient health parameters.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy M Dennett ◽  
Judi Porter ◽  
Stephen B Ting ◽  
Nicholas F Taylor

Abstract BackgroundAutologous stem cell transplant is a common procedure for people with haematological malignancies. While effective at improving survival, autologous stem cell transplant recipients may have a lengthy hospital admission and experience debilitating side-effects such as fatigue, pain and deconditioning that may prolong recovery. Prehabilitation comprising exercise and nutrition intervention before stem cell transplant aims to optimise physical capacity before the procedure to enhance functional recovery after transplant. However, few studies have evaluated prehabilitation in this setting. We aim to determine preliminary efficacy of improving physical capacity of prehabilitation for people undergoing autologous stem cell transplant. MethodsThe PIRATE study is a single-blinded, parallel two-armed pilot randomised trial of multidisciplinary prehabilitation delivered prior to autologous stem cell transplantation. Twenty-two patients with haematological malignancy waitlisted for transplant will be recruited from a tertiary haematology unit. The intervention will include up to 8 weeks of twice-weekly, in-person, supervised tailored exercise and fortnightly nutrition education delivered via phone, in the lead up to autologous stem cell transplant. Blinded assessments will be completed at week 13, approximately 4 weeks after transplant and health service measures collected at week 25 approximately 12 weeks after transplant. The primary outcome is to assess changes in physical capacity using the 6-minute walk test. Secondary measures are time to engraftment, C-reactive protein, physical activity (accelerometer), grip strength, health-related quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and HDC29 supplement), self-efficacy and recording of adverse events. Additionally, health service data including hospital length of stay, hospital readmissions, emergency department presentations and urgent symptom clinic presentation at 6 months will be recorded. DiscussionThis trial will provide valuable information that will inform a future definitive randomised controlled trial and implementation of prehabilitation for people receiving autologous stem cell transplant by providing data on efficacy and safety. Trial registrationThe PIRATE Trial has been approved by the Eastern Health Human Research Ethics Committee (E20/003/61055) and is funded by the Eastern Health Foundation. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620000496910. Registered April 20, 2020, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=379441&isReview=true


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document