scholarly journals Phase II Study of Venetoclax in Combination with Obinutuzumab and Bendamustine in Patients with High Tumor Burden Follicular Lymphoma As Front Line Therapy (PrECOG 0403)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 814-814
Author(s):  
Craig A. Portell ◽  
Opeyemi Jegede ◽  
Nina D. Wagner-Johnston ◽  
Grzegorz S. Nowakowski ◽  
Christopher D. Fletcher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Type I ◽  
High Tumor Burden ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Chemoimmunotherapy is considered standard initial therapy for follicular lymphoma (FL) with high tumor burden (HTB). Obinutuzumab and Bendamustine (OB) with maintenance Obinutuzumab (mO) is considered a standard therapy for the frontline treatment of HTB FL (GALLIUM, Marcus et al, NEJM 2017). Venetoclax (VEN), an oral BCL2 inhibitor, is an attractive target in FL given the high BCL2 expression; though single agent activity has been disappointing (Davids et al. JCO 2017). BCL2 inhibition is thought to be synergistic with chemotherapy. Thus, the PrE0403 study evaluated the OB-VEN combination in frontline HTB FL. Here we present end of induction (EOI) outcomes. Methods: The primary objective of this Phase II study was to estimate the complete remission (CR) rate at EOI. Potential participants must have had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of FL grade 1, 2, or 3a with HTB defined by GELF or high risk defined by FLIPI-1 criteria. They must have had adequate performance status and organ function. Notably, creatinine clearance must have been ≥50 mL/min. Participants must have not had prior treatment for FL. Eligible participants were treated with Bendamustine IV 90 mg/m2 Day (D) 1 & 2, Obinutuzumab IV 100 mg D1, 900 mg D2, 1000 mg D8 and D15 of Cycle (C) 1 then D1 of each cycle, and VEN 800 mg orally daily D1-10 every 28 days for 6 total cycles. Due to a high rate of laboratory tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) during C1 in the first 21 patients, VEN was removed from C1 and given in C2-6 only. Participants with a CR at EOI were treated with mO IV 1000 mg D1 every 8 weeks for 2 years. Those with a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) were treated with mO as well as VEN 800 mg orally daily for 2 years. Pneumocystis jiroveci Pneumonia (PJP) and antiviral prophylaxis was required as was G-CSF support. Response was assessed via Lugano Criteria at EOI including PET/CT and bone marrow assessment. Adverse Events (AEs) were evaluated using CTCAE v5.0. To be considered promising, OB-VEN should improve the null hypothesis CR rate of 50% (OB) to 65%. With an 85% power and a one sided 15% type I error, 56 participants would be needed with an estimated 51 eligible. Support for the study was from Genentech, Member of the Roche Group. Results A total of 56 participants were enrolled and treated between 12/2017 and 11/2020; baseline characteristics are listed in Table 1. TLS was closely monitored in C1 and 8/21 participants developed TLS when VEN was administered in C1; 0/35 when it was not. However, monitoring for TLS in C1 became less stringent when VEN was not administered. Treatment related Grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in 47/56 participants (83.9%) with serious adverse events in 31 of 56 (55.5%). Atypical infections were seen; there was one treatment related death on study due to cytomegalovirus (CMV) encephalitis as well as PJP pneumonia which occurred after induction C6. Enrollment was temporarily suspended and CMV monitoring was implemented with no further occurrences. Another participant receiving mO later developed BK virus nephropathy following mO C6 and now requires ongoing hemodialysis. Another was diagnosed with Respiratory Syncytial Virus pneumonia 30 days after C6 and later PJP pneumonia after C2 of mO. Common (incidence >10%) AEs during induction are listed in Table 2. 45 of 56 (80.4%) participants were able to receive all 6 cycles of OB-VEN. CR was seen in 41 of 56 participants (73.2%, 2 sided 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 59.7-84.2%) at the EOI. 30 participants (53.5%) went onto maintenance. With a median follow up of 20.9 months, estimated 2 year Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (90% CI) is 94.4% (82.4-98.3%) and 85.8% (68.8-93.9%) respectively. Conclusions This Phase II study of OB-VEN in untreated HTB FL showed high CR rate and met its primary endpoint with early signs of prolonged PFS. Laboratory TLS was identified but it was unclear if attributed solely to VEN, as baseline laboratory TLS rate for OB is unknown. The rate of Grade ≥3 AE of 83.9% (compared to 69% for OB in GALLIUM, Hiddeman JCO 2018) and the observation of opportunistic infections including CMV encephalitis, PJP pneumonia and BK nephropathy, suggests the combination is highly immunosuppressive. Therefore, while the study met its primary outcome, the combination of OB-VEN at 800 mg for 10 days, plus mO, does not have an acceptable risk/benefit profile. Participants will continue to be followed for efficacy and safety during the maintenance phase. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Portell: Acerta/AstraZeneca: Research Funding; SeaGen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; BeiGene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Morphosys: Honoraria; Targeted Oncology: Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; VelosBio: Research Funding. Nowakowski: MorphoSys: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Kymera Therapeutics: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Nanostrings: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Zai Labolatory: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Bantham Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Selvita: Consultancy; Ryvu Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kyte Pharma: Consultancy. Cohen: Janssen, Adicet, Astra Zeneca, Genentech, Aptitude Health, Cellectar, Kite/Gilead, Loxo, BeiGene, Adaptive: Consultancy; Genentech, BMS/Celgene, LAM, BioINvent, LOXO, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, M2Gen, Takeda: Research Funding. Kahl: AbbVie, Acerta, ADCT, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie, Adaptive, ADCT, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Incyte, Janssen, Karyopharm, Kite, MEI, Pharmacyclics, Roche, TG Therapeutics, and Teva: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Venetoclax is not approved for follicular lymphoma or in combination with bendamustine and obinutuzumab

scholarly journals Results of a Phase II Study of Obinutuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide in Previously Untreated, High Tumor Burden Follicular Lymphoma (FL)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 125-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽  
Jason R. Westin ◽  
Fredrick B. Hagemeister ◽  
Hun Ju Lee ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Nk Cell ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
High Tumor Burden ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Introduction: FL, the most common indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, is characterized by a defective immune microenvironment that suppresses normal T-cell and natural-killer (NK)-cell activity. The clinical course is often depicted by high initial response rates coupled with a prolonged natural history and repeated relapses with most patients (pts) succumbing to their disease. Effective, well tolerated therapies are desirable. Obinutuzumab (O) is a humanized, type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody glycoengineered for enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Lenalidomide (len) is an immunomodulatory agent that binds the cereblon E3 ubiquitin ligase complex resulting in recruitment, ubiquitination, and degradation of transcription factors Aiolos and Ikaros resulting in T-cell and NK-cell activation. Therefore, combining O with len is anticipated to be synergistic in augmenting the innate and adaptive immune response in FL. The combination has been shown to be well tolerated and effective in relapsed FL (Fowler ICML 2017). Therefore, we sought to explore the efficacy and safety of O-len in previously untreated, high tumor burden FL. Methods: We conducted as single-center, phase 2 study in previously untreated, stage II, III, or IV, high tumor burden (defined by GELF) FL (grade 1, 2 or 3A). Pts received 1000mg of O on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1, day 1 of cycles 2-6, and day 1 of even numbered cycles, cycle 8-30. Cycle length was 28 days. Len was administered as 20mg on days 1-21 of cycles 1-6. Pts in a complete response (CR) after 6 cycles received reduced dose len (10mg on days 1-21) for cycles 7-18. Among pts in a partial response (PR) after 6 cycles, len was continued at 20mg for the next 3-6 cycles or until CR, whichever occurred first, len was then dose reduced to 10mg on days 1-21 for the remainder of 18 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years (according to Lugano 2014 criteria). Secondary endpoints included: safety, CR, PR, overall response (ORR), and overall survival (OS). Results: 90 pts with high tumor burden FL were enrolled. Median age was 58 years (range 33-84), 52% (N=47) were male, 67 (74%) had an ECOG performance status of 0, 9 (10%) had stage II, 23 (26%) stage III, and 58 (64%) had stage IV disease. The majority had grade 1/2 FL (80%). Twenty-one percent had low risk FLIPI scores, 37% intermediate risk, and 42% were high risk. With a median follow-up of 22 months (range 1-30 months), the 2-year PFS estimate is 96% (95% CI 92-100%) with only 2 pts experiencing progression to date. The ORR is 98% (85 CR, 1 PR), 92% achieved a CR at the first response assessment (cycle 4, day 1). Correlative studies are underway including serial circulating tumor DNA measurements. No deaths have been observed to date. Eleven pts (12%) discontinued therapy as a result of an adverse event (AE), upper respiratory infection was the most common reason (N=5). Other reasons included bradycardia with sick sinus syndrome, urinary tract infection, constipation, abdominal pain, fatigue, foot neuroma (N=1 for each instance). The most common grade 3 or higher AEs include neutropenia (16%, grade 3 N=5, grade 4 N= 9), rash (10%), lung infection (4%), neutropenic fever (1%). Conclusions: O-Len was associated with very high CR rates and 2-year PFS estimates in untreated, high tumor burden FL. The toxicity profile was manageable. Further study of this effective, immune therapy approach in untreated FL is warranted. Figure Disclosures Nastoupil: Bayer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria. Westin:Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Juno: Other: Advisory Board; 47 Inc: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board; Kite: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Curis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Parmar:Cellenkos Inc.: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Wang:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MoreHealth: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; BioInvent: Consultancy, Research Funding; VelosBio: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Aviara: Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Neelapu:Acerta: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Allogene: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Unum Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Poseida: Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding. Fowler:ABBVIE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Lenalidomide in untreated follicular lymphoma

A Phase II Trial of Combination Bortezomib (Velcade®) and Rituximab for Untreated “High Tumor Burden” Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL).

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2004-2004
Author(s):  
Kevin A. David ◽  
Mitchell R. Smith ◽  
Izidore S. Lossos ◽  
Eren Roubal ◽  
Jane N. Winter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Cycle Number ◽  
High Tumor Burden

Abstract Traditional therapy for patients with symptomatic and/or high-risk indolent NHL most commonly includes rituximab combined with multiagent cytotoxic chemotherapy. However some patients are not able to tolerate chemotherapy due to advanced age and/ or co-morbidities. Further, combination of novel, targeted agents (non-chemotherapeutic) have been infrequently tested in newly diagnosed indolent NHL patient populations. Overall response rate (ORR) with single-agent rituximab in prior data for untreated indolent NHL was 73% with a complete remission (CR) rate of 37% following maintenance therapy (JCO2002; 20: 4261), although a good portion of patients in that series had low tumor burden at study entry. We hypothesized that frontline bortezomib and rituximab therapy would be effective and well tolerated for untreated “high tumor burden” indolent NHL. We have conducted a Simon 2-stage phase II trial for untreated indolent NHL. All patients were required to have “high tumor burden” as defined by Groupe D’Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires (GELF) criteria. Induction therapy consisted of 3 cycles: bortezomib given at 1.6 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15, and 22 q35 days for all 3 cycles and rituximab at 375 mg/m2 x 4 weekly doses for cycle 1, then day 1 only for cycles 2 and 3. Abbreviated consolidation therapy was subsequently given with 1 dose of each drug q2 months x 8 months. Responses were assessed by computerized tomography (CT) according to Cheson criteria (JCO 1999). We report here the results of the first stage of this 2-stage trial. Twenty-two patients have enrolled, of whom 17 were in the 1st stage. There were 9 women and 8 men; median age was 63 years (range 46–78 years). 14 patients had follicular lymphoma (FL), 2 marginal zone lymphoma, and 1 small lymphocytic lymphoma. 13 of 17 patients had stage IV disease and 4 had stage III. The median Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) was 3 (range 1–4) and the median follow-up was 13 months (range 1–24 months). Responses according to cycle number are shown in Table 1. After only 1 cycle, the ORR was 29% (all partial remissions (PRs)) with 71% stable disease (SD). Following cycle 3, ORR was 59% (24% CR). From cycle 1 to 3, 4/5 PRs converted to CR, 6 SDs converted to PR, while 1 PR and 4 SDs progressed or were removed from the study at physician discretion. 8 of 12 eligible patients have completed consolidation therapy. Following consolidation, 1 PR converted to CR and 2 SDs converted to PR for an ORR of 71%. According to histology, the ORR among FL patients after consolidation therapy was 86% (CR 36%, PR 50%). Therapy was very well tolerated. Grade 3 toxicities seen were lymphopenia, partial small bowel obstruction, and fatigue (all in 1 patient); no grade 4 toxicities occurred. Furthermore, no cytopenias or neurotoxicity was seen. Accrual to the 2nd stage is being completed. In summary, we found in the 1st stage of this phase II trial that bortezomib/rituximab combination therapy for untreated high tumor burden indolent NHL is well tolerated and active. Response rates improved throughout therapy (i.e., from cycle 1 through consolidation), although the CR rate achieved was low compared with chemotherapy-based regimens. Chemotherapy-based therapy should be considered standard therapy for frontline “high tumor burden” indolent NHL, although non-chemotherapy options may be considered for patients not anticipated to tolerate intensive therapy. Furthermore, responses seen here with bortezomib/rituximab, in a uniform high tumor burden patient population, were similar to rituximab alone in lower tumor burden populations. Analysis of clinical trials/reports in indolent NHL should include critical assessment of patient selection and future trials in high tumor burden should incorporate novel therapies into rituximab-chemotherapy based regimens. Table 1. Response according to cycle/treatment. After Cycle 1 After Cycle 3* Following consolidation therapy** *Three patients had PD, while 2 patients were taken off study (without PD) at physician discretion. **Eight of 12 eligible patients have completed post-induction therapy. ORR 29% (5/17) 59% (10/17) 71% (12/17) CR 0% 24% (4/17) 30% (5/17) PR 29% (5/17) 35% (6/17) 41% (7/17) SD 71% (12/17) 12% (2/17) 0% PD/off trial 0% 29% (5/17) 29% (5/17)

Lenalidomide and Rituximab for Untreated Indolent Lymphoma: Final Results of a Phase II Study

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 901-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan H Fowler ◽  
Sattva S. Neelapu ◽  
Fredrick B Hagemeister ◽  
Peter McLaughlin ◽  
Larry W. Kwak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Data Monitoring Committee ◽  
Study Entry ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Indolent Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 901 Background: The optimal management of patients (pts) with untreated, advanced stage indolent non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) is evolving. Although several traditional chemo-immunotherapy regimens achieve high overall response (OR) rates, toxicity is common and nearly all patients relapse. Lenalidomide has single-agent activity in relapsed indolent NHL, and rituximab is effective alone and in combination with chemotherapy in untreated pts. Preclinical studies suggest that lenalidomide may augment immune effector cell function and ADCC in the presence of rituximab. The aim of this phase II, single arm study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide and rituximab in pts with untreated, advanced stage, indolent NHL. Methods: Pts with advanced stage untreated indolent NHL and measurable disease (>1.5cm) were eligible for study entry. Pts received 20 mg/day of lenalidomide on days 1–21 and rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 28 day cycle for 6 cycles. Patients with evidence of tumor response could continue up to 12 cycles. To reduce the incidence of tumor flare, pts with small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) started at 10mg, with monthly dose escalation. Pts were evaluable for response if they had at least 1 response assessment. Prophylactic growth factors were not used. Response was assessed every 3 cycles using the 1999 International Working Group Response Criteria. Results: The study enrolled 110 pts; all have completed treatment or are off-study, and 103 pts are evaluable for response. Histologies included: SLL n=30, follicular lymphoma (FL) n=50, and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) n=30. The median age was 58 (34-84) years, and 53% were male. Of the 46 evaluable pts with FL,78% had a FLIPI score of ≥ 2, and 52% met GELF criteria for high tumor burden. The best response for the 103 evaluable pts is listed in Table 1. Among the FL pts, responses were high regardless of FLIPI score, tumor bulk, or GELF criteria at study entry. At the completion of therapy nearly all FL pts demonstrated molecular response with the absence of detectable BCL-2 by PCR. Forty five evaluable pts with FL had a positive PET scan prior to therapy and 42 (93%) attained a complete metabolic response following treatment. At a median follow up of 22 months, the estimated 2 year progression free survival (PFS) is 83% for all pts and 89% in pts with FL. Among all pts, grade ≥3 neutropenia occurred in 40% (13% of total cycles) and thrombocytopenia occurred in 4% of pts. The most common grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicities included rash (8 pts), muscle pain (7 pts), fatigue (3 pts), thrombosis (3 pts). Two episodes of neutropenic fever occurred. Six pts stopped treatment due to adverse events. Conclusion: The combination of lenalidomide and rituximab is active and tolerable in pts with untreated indolent lymphoma. High complete response rates with durable remissions were observed in patients with follicular lymphoma. Randomized studies comparing this regimen versus traditional combination chemotherapy regimens are underway. Disclosures: Fowler: Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Off Label Use: lenalidomide. Neelapu:Celgene: Research Funding. McLaughlin:Celgene: Data Monitoring Committee for another study Other. Fanale:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wang:Pharmacyclic: Research Funding. Lacerte:Celgene: Honoraria. Samaniego:Celgene: Research Funding.

A phase II study of erlotinib (E) and bevacizumab (B) in patients (pts) with previously untreated stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7625-7625 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J. Groen ◽  
E. F. Smit ◽  
A. Dingemans
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Correlative Imaging ◽  
Unknown Reason ◽  
Grade 3

7625 Background: In advanced NSCLC, E and B either as a single agent (E) or in combination with chemotherapy (B) show improved survival. Combinations of targeted agents may prove to be effective and better tolerated than chemotherapy. Methods: This is a multi-center 2-stage phase II study (Simon's optimal design; p0=40%, p1=60%, a=0.05, β=0.20). Primary endpoint is non-progression (NPR) at 6 weeks defined by CT and FDG-PET. If 7 or less of the first 16 pts had NPR, the study would close. If 24/46 pts had NPR at 6 wks treatment would be declared to have sufficient activity for further testing. Pts (PS 0–2) with advanced non- squamous NSCLC who had received no prior chemotherapy were treated with E (150 mg/day) plus B (15 mg/kg every 21 days) until PD or unacceptable toxicity. Results: Between 30/01/06 and 08/12/06, 38 pts were included; 33 pts are evaluable for safety, 32 for efficacy. M/F 17/16; median age 59 (range 34–80); stage IIIB/IV 8/25; PS 0/1/2: 16/13/4; smoking status: current/former/never 12/17/4. Treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were: rash (32%); diarrhea (18%); hemorrhage (2.6%); hypertension (2.7%); and thrombosis (2.7%). Grade 3/4 events were rash (9.9%); thrombosis (1.8%); diarrhea (0.9%); and hypertension (0.9%). Six pts withdrew early from the study: 2 due to toxicity (trombosis and mucositis); 2 due to death (1 death for unknown reason, 1 due to pneumonia); 2 for treatment unrelated reasons. Six pts had E dose reductions due to toxicity. Five pts had delays of less than 2 wks before receiving B. Percentage of NPR at 6 weeks is 75% (24/32). The median follow-up: 6.3 months (95% CI 3.5–9.2). Median TTP: 5.5 months (95% CI 1.9 - 9.2), At time of analysis 22/33 patients are alive, 17 patients are without PD. Conclusions: E + B regimen is well tolerated, with a low rate of grade 3/4 adverse events and no unexpected toxicities. The primary endpoint has already been met. Updated results including correlative imaging studies will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A Phase II Study of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD), Bortezomib, Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide (DVD-R) for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3044-3044
Author(s):  
James R. Berenson ◽  
Ori Yellin ◽  
Alan D. Cartmell ◽  
Thomas B. S. Woliver ◽  
Marshall S. Flam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
High Response ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3044 Background: Despite the availability of many new therapeutic options showing efficacy for R/R MM patients, many of these treatments produce significant side effects and the disease remains incurable. The combination of PLD and bortezomib has shown significant anti-MM efficacy leading to FDA approval of that combination for patients who have received one prior therapy and are naïve to bortezomib. Moreover, the combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone has also been approved for patients who have received one prior regimen. However, both regimens are associated with significant toxicity and produce response rates in only 40–60% of patients. Previous studies in our laboratory show the increased efficacy and improved tolerability of PLD given daily compared to weekly administration in severe combined immunodeficient mice bearing human MM. Based on these results and the frequent occurrence of peripheral neuropathy with bortezomib when given at 1.3 mg/m2 dose on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 3-week schedule, we modified the doses and schedules of both drugs and added intravenous (i.v) dexamethasone for MM patients. Using a modified lower dose (1.0 mg/m2) and longer cycle (4 weeks) of bortezomib administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 with lower dose PLD and intravenous (i.v.) dexamethasone administered on the same days for MM patients in both the frontline and R/R setting, we have shown the efficacy and marked reduction in AEs including neuropathy, hematologic, and hand-foot syndrome. A recent phase I/II trial investigating the combination of higher doses of lenalidomide, bortezomib, oral dexamethasone, and PLD on a 3-week schedule for newly diagnosed MM patients showed a high response rate but was associated with frequent AEs. Methods: Thus, we conducted a single-arm multi-center phase II study for R/R MM patients to evaluate the combination of i.v. dexamethasone, bortezomib, PLD, and lenalidomide. The treatment consisted of 40 mg dexamethasone followed by 1.0 mg/m2 bortezomib and then 4.0 mg/m2 PLD on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 28-day cycle. Lenalidomide was administered orally at a dose of 10 mg daily on days 1–14 of each cycle. Patients were treated to a maximum response plus two additional cycles or completed a maximum of eight cycles of therapy without disease progression. Results: Eighteen (of 40 planned) patients have been enrolled to date with a median age of 72 years (range, 34–82 years). Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 4 (1-17) prior regimens. Sixteen (89%) patients received prior bortezomib and 11 (61%) were previously treated with either doxorubicin or PLD. Seven (39%) of these patients were exposed to both drugs. Fifteen (83%) had received prior glucocorticoids. Nine (50%) individuals had received immunomodulatory agents with 6 (33%) having been exposed to lenalidomide and all 9 to thalidomide. The majority of patients (72 %) showed International Staging System II or III disease. To date, 16 patients (89%) have shown objective responses to the DVD-R regimen, including 1 complete response (6%), 5 very good partial responses (28%), 4 partial responses (22%) and 6 minimal responses (33%). One of the nonresponding patients showed stable disease and the other progressed after one cycle of therapy. Thus, disease control was achieved in all but one patient (94%). To date, 6 patients have shown progressive disease after a median follow-up time of 6 months (1+ - 9+ months). The DVD-R regimen was well tolerated and only one patient discontinued treatment because of toxicity (peripheral neuropathy). Ten patients experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events. The most common grade 3 adverse events were reversible neutropenia (n=3), pneumonia (n=3), reversible anemia (n=2), and thrombocytopenia (n=2). There were two patients with grade 4 thrombocytopenia that was reversible. To date, 5 patients (28%) have developed treatment-emergent peripheral neuropathy (four grade 1 and one grade 3). Notably, there have been no cases of stomatitis or hand-foot syndrome. Conclusions: Thus, these results suggest that the DVD-R regimen using a modified schedule and doses of the combination of intravenous dexamethasone, bortezomib, PLD and lenalidomide is a well tolerated treatment that produces high response rates for heavily previously treated MM patients with R/R disease. Disclosures: Berenson: Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Centocor OrthoBiotech: Consultancy. Vescio:Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Swift:Millennium: Consultancy.

Phase II Study of Enzastaurin in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma: Updated Final Clinical Results and Immunohistochemical Correlations

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 777-777
Author(s):  
Lee Schwartzberg ◽  
Robert Hermann ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Douglas Flora ◽  
Eric D. Hsi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Qtc Interval ◽  
Correlative Study ◽  
Study Results

Abstract Abstract 777 Background: Protein kinase C β (PKCβ) is critical for B-cell signaling and survival. Over-expression of PKCβ is implicated in the pathogenesis of follicular lymphoma (FL). Enzastaurin (ENZ), an oral serine/threonine kinase inhibitor, targets the PKCβ and PI3K/AKT pathways to inhibit tumor cell proliferation, induce apoptosis, and suppress tumor-induced angiogenesis. Reported here are the final clinical and correlative study results from a phase II study. Methods: This was an open-label, single-arm, study of patients (pts) with hiastologically confirmed grade 1/2 and stage III/IV measurable FL. Pts were either chemonaive or relapsed after 1 chemotherapy regimen or single-agent rituximab. Pts received 500 mg oral ENZ once daily (1125-mg loading dose on D1) ≤ 3 years or until progression, withdrawal, or toxicity. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), and safety. Pre-treatment samples were used for correlative research. Staining was performed for BCL2, BCL6, CD10, Ki67, FOXP1, FOXP3, CD20, MUM1, CD68, and PD1 expression. ENZ-specific biomarkers investigated by immunohistochemistry (IHC; standard H scores range 0–300) included PKCβ2, PTEN, pS6, pGSK3β, and pCREB. Logistic/Cox regression determined the statistical correlation between clinical outcomes (RR or PFS) and IHC for each marker. All tests of association were conducted at a 2-sided α = 0.05. Clinical Results: Sixty-six pts (23 male, 43 female; median age 62 years \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(3382\) \end{document}) were enrolled. Based on FL International Prognostic Index, 12% had low-risk disease (0-1 risk factors [RF]); 55%, intermediate-risk disease (2 RFs); and 33%, high-risk disease (3-5 RFs). Forty-six pts (69.7%) were chemonaive and 20 pts (30.3%) had ≥ 1 prior chemotherapy. The median overall exposure was 10.8 months (mo; 1–57 mo). Of 58 pts who received ≥1 dose of ENZ, 2 (3.4%) had complete response, and 15 (25.9%) had partial response (overall RR = 29.3%). The median PFS was 15.2 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.1–25.7 mo). DoR median was 20.5 mo (95% CI 9.1–31.5 mo). Seven pts (10.6%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events (AEs), of which 5 (7.6%) were possibly drug related: bronchitis, prolonged QTc interval, abdominal distention, colitis, and skin rash. Four pts (6.1%) had drug-related serious AEs: grade (Gr) 3 bronchitis, Gr 2 vision, Gr 2 diarrhea, Gr 2 pancreatitis. There were no drug-related deaths. To date, 5 pts remain on treatment and have been on treatment 3.5–5 years. Correlative Results: Tumor tissue was obtained from 28 pts. Patient demographics and overall RR were well balanced between protocol and correlative study populations. No significant associations with RR or PFS were observed for any FL-specific markers. Significant associations were observed between low cytoplasmic PKCβ2 and increased RR (median H score cutpoint 151.5, odds ratio (OR) [95%CI] = 0.027 [0.001-0.656], p=0.027) (Table 1, Figure 1). Significant associations were also observed between PFS and both cytoplasmic PKCβ2 and cytoplasmic pS6 using median H score cutpoint (Table 1). Conclusions: ENZ has clinical activity and is well tolerated in pts with grade 1/2 FL. Low cytoplasmic PKCβ2 was significantly associated with increased RR and longer PFS; high cytoplasmic pS6 was significantly associated with longer PFS. The correlative results are hypothesis generating given the study's size and nonrandomized nature. Disclosures: Hermann: Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding. Hsi:Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding. Hamid:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Myrand:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Lin:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Thornton:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Shi:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Nguyen:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment.

Phase II Study of the Combination of Ixazomib with Lenalidomide As Maintenance Therapy Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3155-3155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatin J. Shah ◽  
Lei Feng ◽  
Donna Weber ◽  
Sheeba K Thomas ◽  
Michael Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: The role of maintenance lenalidomide (Len) in the post autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) setting has been based on a significant benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) and time to progression (TTP) in the CALBG 100104 and IFM 2005-02 trials, and overall survival (OS) benefit in the CALBG100104 trial. To date, the use of a proteasome inhibitor (PI) as maintenance therapy has been limited by the inconvenience of its IV/subcutaneous administration. Ixazomib, an oral PI, may provide an alternative maintenance therapy. Here we report the results of a single arm phase II study combining ixazomib and lenalidomide as post ASCT maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Methods: This is a single arm phase II study of the combination of lenalidomide/ixazomib (LI) maintenance therapy for NDMM paients post ASCT. The primary objective was to establish safety and efficacy of Len as maintenance therapy. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the incidence of secondary primary malignancies (SPMs), overall response rate (sCR/nCR/VGPR/PR), TTP, time to next therapy, and toxicity profile. Eligible patients had undergone ASCT, with melphalan as a preparative regimen, within 12 months of initiation of induction therapy. Patients were required to start maintenance therapy 60-180 days post ASCT. Treatment consisted of 28 day cycles of ixazomib 4 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and lenalidomide 10 mg daily on days 1-28. Len was increased to 15 mg after 3 months if well tolerated. Based on clinical experience from ongoing phase III studies, the protocol was later amended to reduce the starting dose of ixazomib to 3 mg. Adverse events were graded by NCI-CTCAE v4. Response was assessed by the modified International Uniform Response Criteria. Results: 65 patients (pts) were enrolled with a median age of 60 (range 39-74); 65% (42/65) were male. 39 pts had ISS stage I disease, 13 had Stage II; and 13 had stage III. Of the 65 pts, 47 remain on therapy and as of June 2015, pts have received a median of 10 cycles (range 1-30). The median PFS has not been reached however, the estimated 2-year PFS was 83%. 18 pts are off study: 7 due to progressive disease (PD), 3 at PI discretion, and 8 due to consent withdrawal. 6/7 pts with PD had high risk disease and received 2, 5, 7, 7, 9, 11, and 24 cycles of study therapy. Among the 7 pts with PD, the median PFS post ASCT was 13 months (6-34 months); 3 pts have died with an OS of 15, 27 and 31 months. Grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (AEs) included: grade 3 (G3) anemia (2), G3 neutropenia (13), G4 neutropenia (2); and G3/4 thrombocytopenia (7). Grade 3/4 drug-related non-hematologic AEs included: G3 elevated aspartate aminotransferase (3); G3 back pain (2); G3 constipation (4); G3 creatinine increase (2); G3 nausea and diarrhea (2); G3 fatigue (4). 10 pts had G1/2 rash and 8 pts had G3 rash. 42 patients had G1/2 peripheral neuropathy (PN); 1 pt had G3 PN; and 2 pts had G3/4 respiratory failure. There were no second primary malignancies. Infectious complications included G3 urinary tract infections (2); G3/4 upper respiratory tract infections (4); G3 sinusitis (1); G3 pneumonia (7); G3 influenza (2); G4 infection (1). Other AEs included G4 renal failure due to progressive disease (1); G3 non cardiac chest pain (1); G3 emesis (1); G4 respiratory failure and G4 sepsis/respiratory failure (2). 10 patients required a dose reduction of ixazomib for PN (5); neutropenia (3); thrombocytopenia (1), and hearing loss (1). 1 pt discontinued ixazomib and remained on Len due to persistent PN. 11 pts had a dose reduction in Len to 10 mg for 21 of a 28 day cycle due to cytopenias (neutropenia or thrombocytopenia); 5 pts had a dose reduction to 5 mg due to rash/pruritus in 4 pts and 1 pt due to neutropenia. Conclusions: Long term administration of combination of lenalidomide/ixazomib as maintenance therapy post ASCT is feasible with pts ongoing at 30+ cycles. The incidence of adverse events was similar to historical experience with lenalidomide alone; hematologic adverse events were manageable with dose reductions. The incidence of PN was limited to grade 1/2 events and 1 grade 3 event with no other unexpected toxicity. The combination is safe, feasible, well tolerated and experience to date supports further exploration in phase III studies. Disclosures Shah: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Thomas:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Wang:Celgene: Research Funding. Orlowski:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acetylon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; BioTheryX, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Phase II study of S-1 on alternate days combined with bevacizumab in elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 750-750
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Eto ◽  
Toshikazu Moriwaki ◽  
Hiroyasu Ishida ◽  
Shinji Endo ◽  
Yoshiyuki Yamamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Type I ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

750 Background: The alternate-days administration of S-1 was suggested to reduce toxicities such as GI-related adverse events (AEs) or neutropenia maintaining efficacy in some previous reports. This phase II study was aimed to evaluate an alternate-day administration of S-1 combined with bevacizumab in untreated elderly patients with mCRC. Methods: The key eligibility criteria included age ≥75 years, first-line chemotherapy, measurable lesions, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0–1, preserved organ function, and refusal of oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-containing regimen as the initial chemotherapy. Patients received 40 mg (body surface area [BSA] ≤1.25 m2), 50 mg (BSA > 1.25 to ≤1.50 m2), or (BSA > 1.50 m2) of S-1 orally, twice a day, on Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday every week. Bevacizumab of 7.5 mg/kg was administered every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Expected median PFS was 8.5 months, and efficacy threshold was 5.0 months. The required sample size was calculated as 50 patients, with a 2-sided type I error of 10% and a power of 80%. Results: Of 54 enrolled patients, 50 patients for efficacy and 53 patients for safety were evaluated. The median age was 79 years (range, 75–88), and 56% had an ECOG PS of 0. The median follow-up time was 34.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.6–44.9). Median PFS was 8.1 months (95%CI, 7.4–10.1). Median overall survival was 22.8 months (95%CI, 16.9–28.5). The response rate and disease control rate were 44% and 88%, respectively. Grade 3 or more hematologic, non-hematologic, and bevacizumab-related AEs were observed in 9%, 11%, and 25% of patients, respectively. The most common grade 3 and 4 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (11%), nausea (6%), fatigue (6%), anemia (6%), and proteinuria (6%). Treatment-related death caused by cerebral infarction was observed in one patient. Conclusions: The primary endpoint was met. The alternate-days administration of S-1 combined with bevacizumab was well tolerated and effective in elderly patients with mCRC. Clinical trial information: UMIN000010402.

scholarly journals Carfilzomib Thalidomide and Dexamethasone Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Open Label Phase II Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) MM 018/ Asian Myeloma Network (AMN) 002 Study

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 39-40
Author(s):  
Hang Quach ◽  
Simon J Harrison ◽  
Je-Jung Lee ◽  
Nichloas Murphy ◽  
Jae Hoon Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Background: The combination of carfilzomib with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and dexamethasone is active in multiple myeloma (MM). Carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (KTd) has been studied in upfront MM treatment but has not been studied in the setting of relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM). The ALLG MM018/ AMN002 is an open-label phase II study of KTd in patients with RRMM. This study was conducted across 16 sites across Australia, New-Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Method: Patients with RRMM with 1-3 prior lines of treatment were given carfilzomib [K: 20mg/m2 IV cycle 1 days 1 and 2, 56mg/m2 (36mg/m2 for patients age ≥75 years) from cycle 1 day 8 onwards], thalidomide (T: 100mg po nocte) and dexamethasone [dex: 40mg (20mg for patients age ≥75 years) po weekly], in a 28-day cycle. After 12 cycles, T was omitted, and K was given on days 1,2,15,16 and dex days 1,15 every 28-day cycles for a further six cycles. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were ORR, overall survival, adverse events, and quality of life (QoL). The study had an 80% power to detect a ≥70% PFS at 6.5 months compared to historical ≤50% PFS at 6.5 months expected with Td (Kropff, M. et al. Haematologica 2012), at a significance level of 0.05. Results: This study has completed accrual. Eighty-three patients [median age of 66 years (42-85)] were enrolled with a median follow up of 15.9 (0.9-26) months. ORR rates were 86.4% (≥VGPR 70.2%). Median PFS was 20m (95% CI 15.9-26m). PFS at 6.5 months was 76.2% (95% CI 73.6-84.9%). Median OS has not been reached, and was 75% at 20 months. The most common grade ≥3/4 AEs were peripheral neuropathy (16%), upper respiratory tract infections (12%), dyspnoea (14%), and hypertension (10%). Grade ≥3/4 cardiac AEs occurred in 6%. The median carfilzomib dose that was delivered was 70.7% (32.8-92.6%) of the target dose. Thus far, 41% of patients have completed the intended 18 cycles of treatment. 21% of patients ceased therapy early. The most common reason for early treatment cessation was disease progression (30%) and adverse events (15%). Fifteen patients (18%) have died, 11 were due to MM, two from infection, one from an ischaemic cardiac event, and one from a traffic accident. QoL, as measured by the EQ-5D-5L instrument, remained stable throughout treatment. Conclusion: The ALLG MM018/AMN 002 study has met its primary endpoint. The KTd schedule as outlined in this study is efficacious in patients with RRMM, resulting in a prolonged PFS and a safety profile in line with previous reports for each of carfilzomib and thalidomide. KTd is an active option in jurisdictions where the cost of other IMiDs prohibits regulatory funding. Comparisons of efficacy and adverse events between the Caucasian and Asian populations will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Quach: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Glaxo Kline Smith: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding. Harrison:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: wrt panobinostat; Haemalogix: Consultancy. Augustson:Roche: Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support. Campbell:Amgen, Novartis, Roche, Janssen, Celgene (BMS): Research Funding; AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche, Amgen, CSL Behring, Novartis: Consultancy. Soo:Hanmi: Research Funding. Durie:Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda: Consultancy.

Obinutuzumab plus lenalidomide (GALEN) in advanced, previously untreated follicular lymphoma in need of systemic therapy

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Bachy ◽  
Roch Houot ◽  
Pierre Feugier ◽  
Krimo Bouabdallah ◽  
Reda Bouabdallah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Metabolic Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Common Adverse Event ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Tumor Burden ◽  
Grade 3

Obinutuzumab and lenalidomide (GALEN) is an active immunomodulatory combination with a manageable safety profile in multiple types of lymphoma. We report efficacy and safety results for the phase 2 GALEN study in previously-untreated patients with advanced follicular lymphoma (FL). Eligible patients aged ≥ 18 years had ECOG PS ≤ 2, high-tumor burden, grade 1-3a FL. Induction treatment was obinutuzumab (1000 mg IV, days 8/15/22, cycle 1; day 1, cycles 2-6) plus lenalidomide (20 mg/day, days 1-21, cycle 1; days 2-22, cycles 2-6) for 6 cycles. Maintenance included obinutuzumab (1000 mg every 2 cycles) plus lenalidomide (10 mg, days 2-22) for ≤ 12 cycles (year 1) followed by obinutuzumab (1000 mg every 56 days) for 6 cycles (year 2). The primary endpoint was complete response rate (CRR) after induction per IWG 1999 criteria. From October 2015 to February 2017, 100 patients were enrolled. CRR after induction was 47% and overall response rate (ORR) 92%. Post-hoc analyses per 2014 Lugano classification including patients with missing bone marrow assessments identified an additional 13 patients fulfilling CRR criteria, resulting in a complete metabolic response of 80% and ORR of 94%. At a median follow-up of 3.7 years, 3-year progression-free and overall survival were 82% and 94%, respectively. The most common adverse event was neutropenia (48% any-grade; 47% grade ≥ 3) but only 2% of patients presented febrile neutropenia; others were mainly grade ≤ 2. No other specific grade ≥3 toxicity occurred at a frequency higher than 3%. Overall, these results demonstrated promising clinical efficacy for the chemo-free backbone obinutuzumab and lenalidomide in previously untreated, high tumor burden FL patients. Except for neutropenia, the safety profile of the combination is remarkable. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01582776

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document