Obinutuzumab plus lenalidomide (GALEN) in advanced, previously untreated follicular lymphoma in need of systemic therapy

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Bachy ◽  
Roch Houot ◽  
Pierre Feugier ◽  
Krimo Bouabdallah ◽  
Reda Bouabdallah ◽  
...  

Obinutuzumab and lenalidomide (GALEN) is an active immunomodulatory combination with a manageable safety profile in multiple types of lymphoma. We report efficacy and safety results for the phase 2 GALEN study in previously-untreated patients with advanced follicular lymphoma (FL). Eligible patients aged ≥ 18 years had ECOG PS ≤ 2, high-tumor burden, grade 1-3a FL. Induction treatment was obinutuzumab (1000 mg IV, days 8/15/22, cycle 1; day 1, cycles 2-6) plus lenalidomide (20 mg/day, days 1-21, cycle 1; days 2-22, cycles 2-6) for 6 cycles. Maintenance included obinutuzumab (1000 mg every 2 cycles) plus lenalidomide (10 mg, days 2-22) for ≤ 12 cycles (year 1) followed by obinutuzumab (1000 mg every 56 days) for 6 cycles (year 2). The primary endpoint was complete response rate (CRR) after induction per IWG 1999 criteria. From October 2015 to February 2017, 100 patients were enrolled. CRR after induction was 47% and overall response rate (ORR) 92%. Post-hoc analyses per 2014 Lugano classification including patients with missing bone marrow assessments identified an additional 13 patients fulfilling CRR criteria, resulting in a complete metabolic response of 80% and ORR of 94%. At a median follow-up of 3.7 years, 3-year progression-free and overall survival were 82% and 94%, respectively. The most common adverse event was neutropenia (48% any-grade; 47% grade ≥ 3) but only 2% of patients presented febrile neutropenia; others were mainly grade ≤ 2. No other specific grade ≥3 toxicity occurred at a frequency higher than 3%. Overall, these results demonstrated promising clinical efficacy for the chemo-free backbone obinutuzumab and lenalidomide in previously untreated, high tumor burden FL patients. Except for neutropenia, the safety profile of the combination is remarkable. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01582776

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 265-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Coiffier ◽  
Weimin Li ◽  
Erin D Henitz ◽  
J. D. Karkera ◽  
Reyna Favis ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 265 Background: Treatment goals in patients with relapsed FL are to prolong PFS and improve overall survival (OS). To optimize treatment for individual patients, identification of subgroups most likely to benefit from a specific therapy is important. The international, randomized, phase 3 LYM3001 study in patients with relapsed or refractory FL demonstrated improved PFS with bortezomib-rituximab vs rituximab alone (median 12.8 vs 11.0 months, HR 0.822, p=0.039), plus increased overall response rate (ORR; 63% vs 49%, p=0.0004), complete response rate (CR/CRu; 25% vs 18%, p=0.035), and durable (≥6 months) response rate (50% vs 38%, p=0.002) in an unselected patient population. Here we present exploratory biomarker analyses aimed at identifying patient subgroups deriving a longer PFS benefit with bortezomib-rituximab and showing a trend for better OS. Methods: Patients received five 5-week cycles of bortezomib-rituximab (N=336) or rituximab (N=340). Response was assessed using modified International Working Group response criteria. Archived tumor tissue was collected at baseline from 502 (74%) patients; whole blood samples for germ-line DNA were collected on day 1 of cycle 1 from 619 (92%) patients. Protocol-specified candidate biomarkers were based on associations with bortezomib (NF-κB p65, PSMA5, p27, PSMB1/5/8/9) or rituximab (CD68, FCGR2A/3A) activity. Immunohistochemistry assays were used for protein analysis. Taqman SNP assays and PCR/LDR were used for genotyping. Statistical analyses included single-marker analyses, pair-wise combination analyses (n=1140 comparisons), and multiple comparison analyses of all evaluable patients in LYM3001. Clinical covariates included in the analysis were baseline FLIPI score, prior rituximab, time since last anti-lymphoma therapy, region, age, gender, race, Ann Arbor stage, high tumor burden, and number of prior lines of therapy. Results: Single markers and biomarker pairs (n=102) highlighted patient subsets that had significantly improved outcomes with bortezomib-rituximab vs rituximab. For 14 of the pairs, the PFS benefit was ≥6 months. Using false discovery rate (FDR) to control for multiple comparison corrections, one biomarker pair was significant. This pair (presence of the PSMB1 P11A C/G heterozygote, and low CD68 expression [0–50 CD68-positive macrophages in the follicular space]) was associated with significantly improved PFS in patients receiving bortezomib-rituximab vs rituximab (median 16.6 vs 9.1 months, HR 0.407, p<0.0001, FDR=0.051) and had a population frequency of 33% (n=118) in biomarker-evaluable patients (N=356). Patients with high-risk features were represented in the biomarker-selected population (54% high tumor burden, 41% high FLIPI, 30% >2 prior lines of therapy). There was also a trend towards an OS benefit (medians not reached, HR 0.426, p=0.0550), as well as a significantly higher ORR (73.7% vs 47.5%, p=0.0077), a higher CR rate (33.3% vs 23%, p=0.3044), and a significantly longer time to next therapy (median 33.1 vs 14.8 months, p=0.0013). In patients lacking this biomarker pair (N=238) no significant efficacy differences were seen. No other similar studies were available to confirm the reproducibility of these analyses. Therefore, we split the LYM3001 dataset into discovery and confirmation cohorts (7:3 ratio of biomarker-evaluable patients) to enable evaluation and confirmation in independent cohorts of patients The significant biomarker pair of PSMB1 P11A C/G heterozygote and low CD68 was identified in the discovery cohort (N=198) with a PFS advantage with bortezomib-rituximab vs rituximab of 5.7 months (median 14.2 vs 8.4 months, p=0.0003) and an indication of longer OS (HR 0.47, p=0.1291). This biomarker pair also showed a clear PFS advantage in the confirmation cohort (N=108, 8.7-month PFS benefit; median 18.2 vs 9.5 months, HR 0.44, p=0.0817). Other significant biomarker combinations, including combinations of molecular and clinical variables (e.g. high tumor burden) were identified and will be presented. Conclusions: Analyses of the phase 3 LYM3001 trial identified biomarker combinations present in a third of patients offering a significant PFS benefit with bortezomib-rituximab vs rituximab. Use of such biomarker assays in patients with relapsed or refractory FL may aid identification of subgroups deriving maximal benefit from the addition of bortezomib to rituximab therapy. Disclosures: Coiffier: Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; MedImmune: Consultancy; CTI: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Bortezomib used in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. Li:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Henitz:Janssen Research & Development: Employment. Karkera:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Favis:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Gaffney:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Shapiro:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Theocharous:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Elsayed:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. de Velde:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Rule:Johnson & Johnson: Advisory Board, Institutional grant, meeting attendance expenses, Honoraria. Walewski:Janssen-Cilag: Institutional/personal grants, advisory board; Hoffman La Roche: Honoraria, Institutional/personal grants, travel/accommodation expenses; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. de Vos:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy. Crump:Janssen/Ortho-Biotech: Consultancy. Shpilberg:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cakana:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Esseltine:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Mulligan:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Ricci:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (25) ◽  
pp. 3396-3401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie H. Sehn ◽  
David MacDonald ◽  
Sheldon Rubin ◽  
Guy Cantin ◽  
Morel Rubinger ◽  
...  

Purpose Bortezomib has demonstrated promising activity in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). This is the first study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bortezomib added to rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CVP) in previously untreated advanced-stage FL. Patients and Methods This is a phase II multicenter trial adding bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) to standard-dose R-CVP (BR-CVP) for up to eight cycles in patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV FL requiring therapy. Two co-primary end points, complete response rate (complete response [CR]/CR unconfirmed [CRu]) and incidence of grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity, were assessed. Results Between December 2006 and March 2009, 94 patients were treated with BR-CVP. Median patient age was 57 years (range, 29 to 84 years), and the majority had a high (47%) or intermediate (43%) Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index score. BR-CVP was extremely well tolerated, with 90% of patients completing the intended eight cycles. No patients developed grade 4 neurotoxicity, and only five of 94 patients (5%; 95% CI, 0.8% to 9.9%) developed grade 3 neurotoxicity, which was largely reversible. On the basis of an intention-to-treat analysis, 46 of 94 patients (49%; 95% CI, 38.8% to 59.0%) achieved a CR/CRu, and 32 of 94 patients (34%) achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 83% (95% CI, 75.4% to 90.6%). Conclusion The addition of bortezomib to standard-dose R-CVP for advanced-stage FL is feasible and well tolerated with minimal additional toxicity. The complete response rate in this high-risk population compares favorably to historical results of patients receiving R-CVP. Given these results, a phase III trial comparing BR-CVP with R-CVP is planned.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 125-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽  
Jason R. Westin ◽  
Fredrick B. Hagemeister ◽  
Hun Ju Lee ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
...  

Introduction: FL, the most common indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, is characterized by a defective immune microenvironment that suppresses normal T-cell and natural-killer (NK)-cell activity. The clinical course is often depicted by high initial response rates coupled with a prolonged natural history and repeated relapses with most patients (pts) succumbing to their disease. Effective, well tolerated therapies are desirable. Obinutuzumab (O) is a humanized, type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody glycoengineered for enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Lenalidomide (len) is an immunomodulatory agent that binds the cereblon E3 ubiquitin ligase complex resulting in recruitment, ubiquitination, and degradation of transcription factors Aiolos and Ikaros resulting in T-cell and NK-cell activation. Therefore, combining O with len is anticipated to be synergistic in augmenting the innate and adaptive immune response in FL. The combination has been shown to be well tolerated and effective in relapsed FL (Fowler ICML 2017). Therefore, we sought to explore the efficacy and safety of O-len in previously untreated, high tumor burden FL. Methods: We conducted as single-center, phase 2 study in previously untreated, stage II, III, or IV, high tumor burden (defined by GELF) FL (grade 1, 2 or 3A). Pts received 1000mg of O on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1, day 1 of cycles 2-6, and day 1 of even numbered cycles, cycle 8-30. Cycle length was 28 days. Len was administered as 20mg on days 1-21 of cycles 1-6. Pts in a complete response (CR) after 6 cycles received reduced dose len (10mg on days 1-21) for cycles 7-18. Among pts in a partial response (PR) after 6 cycles, len was continued at 20mg for the next 3-6 cycles or until CR, whichever occurred first, len was then dose reduced to 10mg on days 1-21 for the remainder of 18 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years (according to Lugano 2014 criteria). Secondary endpoints included: safety, CR, PR, overall response (ORR), and overall survival (OS). Results: 90 pts with high tumor burden FL were enrolled. Median age was 58 years (range 33-84), 52% (N=47) were male, 67 (74%) had an ECOG performance status of 0, 9 (10%) had stage II, 23 (26%) stage III, and 58 (64%) had stage IV disease. The majority had grade 1/2 FL (80%). Twenty-one percent had low risk FLIPI scores, 37% intermediate risk, and 42% were high risk. With a median follow-up of 22 months (range 1-30 months), the 2-year PFS estimate is 96% (95% CI 92-100%) with only 2 pts experiencing progression to date. The ORR is 98% (85 CR, 1 PR), 92% achieved a CR at the first response assessment (cycle 4, day 1). Correlative studies are underway including serial circulating tumor DNA measurements. No deaths have been observed to date. Eleven pts (12%) discontinued therapy as a result of an adverse event (AE), upper respiratory infection was the most common reason (N=5). Other reasons included bradycardia with sick sinus syndrome, urinary tract infection, constipation, abdominal pain, fatigue, foot neuroma (N=1 for each instance). The most common grade 3 or higher AEs include neutropenia (16%, grade 3 N=5, grade 4 N= 9), rash (10%), lung infection (4%), neutropenic fever (1%). Conclusions: O-Len was associated with very high CR rates and 2-year PFS estimates in untreated, high tumor burden FL. The toxicity profile was manageable. Further study of this effective, immune therapy approach in untreated FL is warranted. Figure Disclosures Nastoupil: Bayer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria. Westin:Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Juno: Other: Advisory Board; 47 Inc: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board; Kite: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Curis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Parmar:Cellenkos Inc.: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Wang:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MoreHealth: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; BioInvent: Consultancy, Research Funding; VelosBio: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Aviara: Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Neelapu:Acerta: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Allogene: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Unum Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Poseida: Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding. Fowler:ABBVIE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Lenalidomide in untreated follicular lymphoma


Author(s):  
Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽  
Collin K Chin ◽  
Jason R Westin ◽  
Nathan H Fowler ◽  
Felipe Samaniego ◽  
...  

PD-1 blockade enhances the function of anti-tumor T-cells and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) of NK cells. In a single-center, open-label, phase 2 trial, we tested the combination of pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody and rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that induces ADCC, in 30 follicular lymphoma (FL) patients with rituximab-sensitive disease who relapsed after ≥1 prior therapy. Pembrolizumab was administered at 200mg IV every 3 weeks for up to 16 cycles and rituximab was given at 375mg/m2 IV weekly for 4 weeks in cycle 1 only. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) were liver enzyme abnormalities (3%), diarrhea (3%), nausea (3%), aseptic meningitis (3%) and pancreatitis (3%). Low-grade immune-related AEs were reported for 80% of patients, including diarrhea (43%), liver enzyme abnormalities (33%), thyroid dysfunction (27%), and rash (23%). Grade 3 or 4 immune related AEs occurred in 13% of patients. Treatment-related AEs led to discontinuation in 6 (20%) patients. Overall response rate (primary endpoint) was 67% and complete response rate was 50%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.6 months (95% CI, 8.2-27.6 months), the 3-year overall survival rate was 97%, and 23% of patients were in remission at a median follow up of 35 months. Presence of a high CD8+ T-effector score at baseline in the tumor was associated with induction of a complete response and improved PFS. In this single arm, phase 2 study, the combination of pembrolizumab and rituximab demonstrates favorable efficacy and safety profile in relapsed FL. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02446457.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (25) ◽  
pp. 3389-3395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Fowler ◽  
Brad S. Kahl ◽  
Peter Lee ◽  
Jeffrey V. Matous ◽  
Amanda F. Cashen ◽  
...  

Purpose The aims of this multicenter study were to evaluate the response rate, progression-free survival, and toxicity of the combination of bortezomib, bendamustine, and rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma whose disease was relapsed or refractory to prior treatment. Patients and Methods Patients received five 35-day cycles of bortezomib, bendamustine, and rituximab: bortezomib administered intravenously (IV) at a dose of 1.6 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, cycles one to five; bendamustine 50, 70, or 90 mg/m2 IV over a 60-minute infusion on days 1 and 2, cycles one to five; and rituximab 375 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle one and day 1 of subsequent cycles. Patients were assessed using the International Workshop Response Criteria, with the primary end point of 60% complete response rate. Results Seventy-three patients were enrolled. During the dose-escalation phase, the maximum-tolerated dose for bendamustine was not reached; the 90 mg/m2 dose level was expanded for the efficacy assessment, and a total of 63 patients received bendamustine 90 mg/m2. In these 63 patients, the overall response rate was 88% (including 53% complete response). Median duration of response was 11.7 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 13.3). Median progression-free survival was 14.9 months (95% CI, 11.1 to 23.7). Toxicities were manageable; myelosuppression was the main toxicity (25% and 14% of patients experienced grade 3 to 4 neutropenia and grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia, respectively). Transient grade 3 to 4 neuropathy occurred in 11% of patients. Conclusion The combination of bortezomib, bendamustine, and rituximab is highly active in patients with follicular lymphoma who have received previous treatment.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 160-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Andre Salles ◽  
Charles Foussard ◽  
Mounier Nicolas ◽  
Morschhauser Franck ◽  
Doyen Chantal ◽  
...  

Abstract The monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody rituximab has been shown to induce a high response rate in follicular lymphoma patients and to improve the outcome when associated with CVP or CHOP in newly diagnosed patients. Rituximab synergy with αIFN has also been established in experimental and clinical studies. In order to investigate the benefit of rituximab when added to the classical association of αIFN with CHVP (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, doxorubicin 25 mg/m2, etoposide 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and prednisone 40 mg/m2 day 1–5), the intergroup GELA-GOELAMS FL-2000 trial was initiated. Inclusion criteria consisted in untreated histologically proven stage II-IV follicular lymphoma (any grade) patients (18–75 years) with a high tumor burden consisting in the presence of at least one of the following criteria: B symptoms presence; ECOG PS≥1; LDH>normal value; β2-microglobulin≥3 mg/L; largest tumor≥7cm; three distinct nodes≥3cm; serous effusion, compression or symptomatic splenomegaly). Treatment in arm A consisted in CHVP (6 monthly courses + 6 courses every 2 months) associated with αIFN-2a (4.5 MU [reduced at 3 MU > 70 years] 3 times a week) for 18 months and in arm B in 6 monthly courses of CHVP associated with 18 months of αIFN-2a combined with 6 infusions of 375 mg/m2 rituximab (Day 1 and 8 course 3 & 4 ; day 1 courses 5 & 6). Patients were evaluated for response at 6 months and 18 months and followed every 3 months. From 05/2000 until 05/2002, 359 eligible patients were included (Arm A 175 pts and Arm B 184 pts) with the following characteristics: M/F =1; median age =60 years [25–75]; ECOG>1 =8%; B symptoms =27%; AA stage>II =87%; bone marrow involvement =58%; β2−m≥3mg/L =31%; LDH>N =37%; Hb≤12g/dL =18%; the FLIPI score was ≥3 in 56% of patients. This first analysis of all patients demonstrated a significant improvement of response to therapy in arm B as compared to arm A, both at 6 months [CR+CRru 49% vs. 76%; PR 36% vs. 18%; stable, progression or death 15% vs. 6%; respectively (P<.0001)] and at 18 months [CR+CRu 79% vs. 63%; PR 5% vs. 10%; stable, progression or death 17% vs. 27%; respectively (P=.004)]. With a median follow-up of 30 months, the median EFS was not reached in both arms and 104 patients presented an event. In the control arm, estimated 2.5 years EFS is of 62% versus 78% in arm B (P=.003). In conclusion, this first analysis indicate that 1) the control arm reproduces earlier results with the same regimen 2) rituximab associated with α-IFN+CHVP induces a higher response rate in high tumor burden FL patients; 3) rituximab addition to αIFN+CHVP allows to reduce the number of CHVP chemotherapy cycles and 4) this rituximab association with αIFN+CHVP results in a marked improvement of event-free survival comparing favorably to the control arm or to other rituximab+chemotherapy combinations.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 814-814
Author(s):  
Craig A. Portell ◽  
Opeyemi Jegede ◽  
Nina D. Wagner-Johnston ◽  
Grzegorz S. Nowakowski ◽  
Christopher D. Fletcher ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Chemoimmunotherapy is considered standard initial therapy for follicular lymphoma (FL) with high tumor burden (HTB). Obinutuzumab and Bendamustine (OB) with maintenance Obinutuzumab (mO) is considered a standard therapy for the frontline treatment of HTB FL (GALLIUM, Marcus et al, NEJM 2017). Venetoclax (VEN), an oral BCL2 inhibitor, is an attractive target in FL given the high BCL2 expression; though single agent activity has been disappointing (Davids et al. JCO 2017). BCL2 inhibition is thought to be synergistic with chemotherapy. Thus, the PrE0403 study evaluated the OB-VEN combination in frontline HTB FL. Here we present end of induction (EOI) outcomes. Methods: The primary objective of this Phase II study was to estimate the complete remission (CR) rate at EOI. Potential participants must have had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of FL grade 1, 2, or 3a with HTB defined by GELF or high risk defined by FLIPI-1 criteria. They must have had adequate performance status and organ function. Notably, creatinine clearance must have been ≥50 mL/min. Participants must have not had prior treatment for FL. Eligible participants were treated with Bendamustine IV 90 mg/m2 Day (D) 1 & 2, Obinutuzumab IV 100 mg D1, 900 mg D2, 1000 mg D8 and D15 of Cycle (C) 1 then D1 of each cycle, and VEN 800 mg orally daily D1-10 every 28 days for 6 total cycles. Due to a high rate of laboratory tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) during C1 in the first 21 patients, VEN was removed from C1 and given in C2-6 only. Participants with a CR at EOI were treated with mO IV 1000 mg D1 every 8 weeks for 2 years. Those with a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) were treated with mO as well as VEN 800 mg orally daily for 2 years. Pneumocystis jiroveci Pneumonia (PJP) and antiviral prophylaxis was required as was G-CSF support. Response was assessed via Lugano Criteria at EOI including PET/CT and bone marrow assessment. Adverse Events (AEs) were evaluated using CTCAE v5.0. To be considered promising, OB-VEN should improve the null hypothesis CR rate of 50% (OB) to 65%. With an 85% power and a one sided 15% type I error, 56 participants would be needed with an estimated 51 eligible. Support for the study was from Genentech, Member of the Roche Group. Results A total of 56 participants were enrolled and treated between 12/2017 and 11/2020; baseline characteristics are listed in Table 1. TLS was closely monitored in C1 and 8/21 participants developed TLS when VEN was administered in C1; 0/35 when it was not. However, monitoring for TLS in C1 became less stringent when VEN was not administered. Treatment related Grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in 47/56 participants (83.9%) with serious adverse events in 31 of 56 (55.5%). Atypical infections were seen; there was one treatment related death on study due to cytomegalovirus (CMV) encephalitis as well as PJP pneumonia which occurred after induction C6. Enrollment was temporarily suspended and CMV monitoring was implemented with no further occurrences. Another participant receiving mO later developed BK virus nephropathy following mO C6 and now requires ongoing hemodialysis. Another was diagnosed with Respiratory Syncytial Virus pneumonia 30 days after C6 and later PJP pneumonia after C2 of mO. Common (incidence &gt;10%) AEs during induction are listed in Table 2. 45 of 56 (80.4%) participants were able to receive all 6 cycles of OB-VEN. CR was seen in 41 of 56 participants (73.2%, 2 sided 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 59.7-84.2%) at the EOI. 30 participants (53.5%) went onto maintenance. With a median follow up of 20.9 months, estimated 2 year Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (90% CI) is 94.4% (82.4-98.3%) and 85.8% (68.8-93.9%) respectively. Conclusions This Phase II study of OB-VEN in untreated HTB FL showed high CR rate and met its primary endpoint with early signs of prolonged PFS. Laboratory TLS was identified but it was unclear if attributed solely to VEN, as baseline laboratory TLS rate for OB is unknown. The rate of Grade ≥3 AE of 83.9% (compared to 69% for OB in GALLIUM, Hiddeman JCO 2018) and the observation of opportunistic infections including CMV encephalitis, PJP pneumonia and BK nephropathy, suggests the combination is highly immunosuppressive. Therefore, while the study met its primary outcome, the combination of OB-VEN at 800 mg for 10 days, plus mO, does not have an acceptable risk/benefit profile. Participants will continue to be followed for efficacy and safety during the maintenance phase. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Portell: Acerta/AstraZeneca: Research Funding; SeaGen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; BeiGene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Morphosys: Honoraria; Targeted Oncology: Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; VelosBio: Research Funding. Nowakowski: MorphoSys: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Kymera Therapeutics: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Nanostrings: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Zai Labolatory: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Bantham Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Selvita: Consultancy; Ryvu Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kyte Pharma: Consultancy. Cohen: Janssen, Adicet, Astra Zeneca, Genentech, Aptitude Health, Cellectar, Kite/Gilead, Loxo, BeiGene, Adaptive: Consultancy; Genentech, BMS/Celgene, LAM, BioINvent, LOXO, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, M2Gen, Takeda: Research Funding. Kahl: AbbVie, Acerta, ADCT, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie, Adaptive, ADCT, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Incyte, Janssen, Karyopharm, Kite, MEI, Pharmacyclics, Roche, TG Therapeutics, and Teva: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Venetoclax is not approved for follicular lymphoma or in combination with bendamustine and obinutuzumab


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1639-1639
Author(s):  
Francisco Javier Peñalver ◽  
José Antonio Márquez ◽  
Soledad Durán ◽  
Pilar Giraldo ◽  
Carlos Montalban ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1639 Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab-bendamustine-mitoxantrone-dexamethasone (R-BMD) in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma, (R/R FL) to first-line therapy with R-chemotherapy (R-ChemoT), followed by maintenance with R. Methods Phase II trial including 61 patients with R/R LF, after a 1st R-ChemoT line. Induction treatment: Rituximab 375 mg/m2 iv, day 1; bendamustine 90 mg/m2 iv, days 1 and 2; mitoxantrone 6 mg/m2/day iv, day 1; oral dexamethasone 20 mg / day, days 1 to 5. Cycles of 28 days. Evaluation of response after 3rd cycle. If stable disease or progression: withdrawal from the study. If complete response (CR) or complete response unconfirmed (CRu): administration of a 4th cycle. If partial response (PR): administration up to 6 cycles. If CR, CRu or PR at the end of induction: patients receive maintenance with R 375 mg/m2/day every 12 weeks for 2 years. Primary objective: Complete responses (CR + CRu). Results are presented as valid % and median [range]. Results Results from 46 patients who completed induction period. 52.2% women, age 63 [32–76] years. Ann Arbor stage III / IV 75.6% (31/41) and III / IV-B 22.6% (7/31). FLIPI: intermediate risk 28.9% (11/38); high-risk 23.7% (9/38). Number of administered cycles: 4 [1–6]. Overall response 93.5% (43/46); CR: see Table 1. Progression Free Survival –median (CI95%)-: 14.5 (11.6-NA) months. The most relevant grade 3/4 toxicity: neutropenia 52% (n = 24; 17 patients received G-CSF) and thrombocytopenia 4.3% (n = 2). Infections grade 3/4: 6.5% (n = 3). One patient died due to CMV reactivation. No skin reactions were reported. There are maintenance available data from 15 patients: 3 patients sustained CR at the end of this period, and 2 patients progressed. Conclusions R-BMD is a treatment schedule effective and a safe alternative for patients with R/R FL, after a 1st line with R-ChemoT. No skin reactions were reported, possibly due to the inclusion of dexamethasone in the treatment scheme. Additional follow up is required to achieve more conclusive findings. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 270-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Radford ◽  
Andrew Davies ◽  
Guillaume Cartron ◽  
Franck Morschhauser ◽  
Gilles Andre Salles ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 270 Obinutuzumab (GA101), the first type II, glycoengineered, humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody in clinical development, has shown single-agent activity in Phase I and II studies in follicular lymphoma (FL), but no studies have so far examined the safety and activity of GA101 in combination with chemotherapy, or compared GA101 dose levels in large cohorts. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety and efficacy of GA101 in combination with standard chemotherapy regimens for FL at two different doses of GA101. Patients with relapsed or refractory FL (n=56) were stratified by chemotherapy regimen based upon prior treatment history (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone [6–8 21 day cycles; n=28] or fludarabine/cyclophosphamide [4–6 28 day cycles; n=28]). Patients were then randomized to one of two GA101 dosing regimens: 1,600 mg on Days 1 and 8 of cycle 1 then 800 mg for subsequent cycles (1,600/800 mg) or 400 mg in all cycles (400/400 mg). These regimens represent a range of active doses in indolent lymphoma, based upon Phase I and II trials in which there were no dose-limiting toxicities. Responding patients were offered maintenance treatment for 2 years or until progression. The primary objective was safety, with response rate a secondary objective. Response was assessed at the end of induction using International Working Group response criteria (Cheson, et al. J Clin Oncol 1999), modified to classify unconfirmed complete response as partial response. Baseline characteristics were similar for both groups (G-CHOP and G-FC, respectively): median age 62.5 and 61.0 years; low-risk FLIPI 29% in both groups; median prior treatments (range) 1 (1–3) and 2 (1–6); bone marrow involvement 25% and 26%; Ann Arbor stage III–IV at study entry 64% and 82%. All patients (28/28) in the G-CHOP arm and 22/28 patients in the G-FC arm completed treatment. Reasons for withdrawal (G-FC arm) were neutropenia (n=3), rash (n=1), infection (n=1) and insufficient response (n=1). The most common AEs in both groups were infusion-related reactions (all grades: 64% G-CHOP; 79% G-FC; Grade 3/4: 7% G-CHOP; 7% G-FC), mostly during the first infusion. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was reported in 39% of G-CHOP patients and 50% of G-FC patients. Of 190 cycles of G-CHOP delivered, 11 cycles (6%) were delayed in 8 patients for neutropenia or infection (6 cycles delayed by 1 week; 5 cycles delayed by 2 weeks). Dose of any CHOP component was reduced in 29% of patients, in 5 patients for neuropathy and in 1 patient each because of neutropenia, infection and allergic rhinitis. In the G-FC group, 14 of 135 delivered cycles (10%) were delayed in 10 patients for hematologic toxicity or infections (10 cycles delayed by 1 week; 4 cycles delayed by 2 weeks). Nine of these patients also had a dose reduction in both cytostatic components of the regimen with a further patient having a dose reduction only, for an overall dose reduction in 36% of patients. Three deaths were reported following G-FC induction treatment (progressive disease, n=1; underlying Parkinson's disease, n=1; and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during maintenance, n=1), with none considered to be treatment-related. There was no evidence for increased toxicity with the 1,600/800 mg dose compared with the 400/400 mg dose of GA101. The overall response rate (ORR) at the end of induction was 96.4% in the G-CHOP group (39.3% complete response [CR]) and 92.9% in the G-FC group (50.0% CR) (Table). Data from the G-CHOP cohort were compared in a matched-pair analysis to the rituximab plus CHOP (R-CHOP) arm from study M39022 (EORTC 20981) in a similar patient population. Response rates to G-CHOP compared favorably with response rates to R-CHOP.Response rates at end of inductionResponse, n (%)G-CHOPG-FCOverall response27 (96.4)26 (92.9)Complete response11 (39.3)14 (50.0)Partial response16 (57.1)12 (42.9)Stable disease1 (3.6)0Progressive disease01 (3.6)Not assessed01 (3.6) In conclusion, GA101 can be combined safely with chemotherapy regimens used in the treatment of FL, and demonstrates a high level of activity compared with historical controls. G-CHOP could be delivered at the protocol-specified 3-weekly interval in most patients. G-FC in a more heavily pretreated population showed worse tolerability. Following these promising results, GA101 will be studied in combination with CHOP and other chemotherapies in a randomized Phase III study against the standard of care, R-CHOP. Disclosures: Cartron: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Morschhauser:Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Salles:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Wenger:Roche: Employment. Asikanius:Roche: Employment. Wassner-Fritsch:Roche: Employment. Vitolo:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaetano Paone ◽  
Mariana Raditchkova-Sarnelli ◽  
Teresa Ruberto-Macchi ◽  
Marco Cuzzocrea ◽  
Emanuele Zucca ◽  
...  

AbstractDespite follicular lymphoma (FL) is frequently characterized by a moderate increase of glucose metabolism, PET/CT examinations provides valuable information for staging and response assessment of the disease. The aim of the study was to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT, respectively, in evaluating FL patients at the end of treatment. Fifty FL consecutive patients who underwent end-of-therapy PET/CT with both ldCT and ceCT were analyzed. Two blinded observers independently assessed PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT applying the Deauville score (DS) and Lugano classification criteria. PET imaging obtained after the end-of-treatment (EoT) was classified as showing PET and ce-CT matched response (concordant imaging group, CIG) or PET and ce-CT unmatched response (discordant imaging group, DIG). Relapse rate and Event-Free Survival (EFS) were compared between CIG and DIG patients. Overall, no differences in metabolic response classification were observed between PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT. In 13 (26%) patients PET/ceCT identified additional FDG-negative nodal lesions in mesenteric, retroperitoneal and iliac regions. However, in all cases, final DS remained unchanged and the additional results did not modify the following therapeutic decision. Among patients, who obtained complete metabolic response a comparable rate of relapse was registered in DIG 3/13 (23%) and CIG subgroups 5/20 (25%) [p = 0.899]. In all 3 DIG cohort patients who relapsed the recurrent disease involved also, but not exclusively, PET negative lymph nodes detected by ceCT. In overall population metabolic response defined by PET/ldCT predicted EFS [76% (group of patients with metabolic response) vs 35% (group of patients with residual disease), p = 0.0013] significantly better than ceCT-Based response assessment [75% (group of patients with complete response) vs 53% (group of patients with residual disease), p = 0.06]. Our study demonstrates a negligible diagnostic and predictive value of ceCT performed in addition to standard 18FDG PET/ldCT for EoT response evaluation in FLs. PET/ldCT should be performed as first-line imaging procedure, also in patients with prevalent abdominal and pelvic involvement, limiting the acquisition of ceCT in selected cases. This tailored approach would contribute to avoid useless radiation exposure and preserve renal function of patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document