An Oncology Simulation Model to Estimate 10-Year Progression-Free Survival and Stem Cell Transplantation for Frontline, Stage III or IV Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Based on the 5-Year Update of the ECHELON-1 Trial: A United States Perspective

Abstract Objectives Doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) is the most common frontline (1L) regimen for patients with stage III or IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), but about 30% of patients with stage III or IV cHL have refractory or relapsed disease after ABVD treatment. Based on the 5-year update of the ECHELON-1 trial, patients on 1L brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (A+AVD) continued to demonstrate a robust and durable progression-free survival (PFS) improvement vs ABVD with a 32% reduction in the risk of progression or death (HR=0.681, nominal P=0.002). Our objective was to estimate the future number of patients with cHL who are alive and progression-free over 10-years with 1L A+AVD, based on the 5-year follow-up results from ECHELON-1. Methods An oncology simulation model, from the United States perspective, was developed with a 1-month cycle length that estimates population-level outcomes based on annual prevalence of cHL, considering disease incidence, treatment patterns, PFS, and overall survival of commonly used treatment regimens for stage III or IV cHL. Incidence of cHL was derived from the 2019 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, assuming 95% of HL is classical of which 41% is stage III or IV. To populate the base case model, treatment patterns following 1L use of ABVD (64.5%) and positron emission tomography (PET)-adapted therapy (35.5%) were varied over time and compared to A+AVD (24%). For every model cycle, patients who experienced disease progression on 1L therapy discontinued therapy and transitioned to second-line (salvage) therapy. The transition from second-line therapy to transplant is also included in the model based on patient eligibility. Model inputs were informed by 1) real-world treatment utilization; 2) treatment-specific clinical trial data, including ECHELON-1 with 5-year PFS rates of 75.3% for ABVD (95% CI: 70.0, 85.0) and 82.2% for A+AVD (95% CI: 71.7, 78.5); and 3) expert clinicians' opinions. Annual prevalence of patients living progression-free with cHL in the 1L setting with each prescribing scenario was estimated for 10 years (year 2031) with and without the availability of A+AVD. Results The annual number of newly diagnosed patients with stage III or IV cHL at 10 years in 2031 was estimated at 3,586. The number of patients alive and progression-free in the 1L setting was 19,494 without A+AVD and 19,660 with A+AVD (Δ+166, 0.85% increase) in 2031. Overall, for every 100 patients prescribed A+AVD, it was predicted that an additional 6.5 patients per year achieved at least 5 years PFS and 4.2 to 4.7 fewer patients per year required a stem cell transplant (SCT), based on the 70% to 80% of eligible patient proceeding to SCT, respectively. Conclusions The durable PFS improvement of A+AVD vs ABVD in the 5-year follow-up data from ECHELON-1 resulted in increasing the number of patients with stage III or IV cHL who remain progression free for greater than 10 years and reducing future SCTs, based on this oncology simulation model for cHL. The significant improvement in PFS observed in the 5-year ECHELON-1 trial may translate to fewer patients with cHL developing primary refractory or relapsed disease and reduce the need for additional therapies including SCT. Disclosures Phillips: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Other: received travel expenses from Incyte, Research Funding; ADCT, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, Incyte, Karyopharm, Morphosys, Pharmacyclics, Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy. Migliaccio-Walle: Seagen, Inc: Consultancy. Yu: Seagen, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bloudek: Seagen, Inc: Consultancy. Liu: Seagen, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fanale: Seagen, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Burke: Beigene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy; Kymera: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; MorphoSys: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy; X4 Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; SeaGen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

An Oncology Simulation Model to Estimate 10-Year Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival Based on the 5-Year Update from the ECHELON-2 Trial in Frontline Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: A United States Perspective

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148004 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2466-2466

Author(s):

John M. Burke ◽

Kristina S. Yu ◽

Uche Mordi ◽

Brian Bloudek ◽

Nicholas Liu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Brentuximab Vedotin ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Free Survival ◽

Number Of Patients

Abstract Objectives Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a rare and aggressive type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) associated with a poor prognosis. Common frontline (1L) regimens include brentuximab vedotin plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (A+CHP), and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone with or without the addition of etoposide (CHOP and CHOEP, respectively). Based on the 5-year update of the ECHELON-2 trial, patients with previously untreated CD30-expressing PTCL on A+CHP continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with CHOP. Our objective was to estimate the future number of patients alive and progression free with A+CHP over 10-years, based on the 5-year follow-up results from ECHELON-2. Methods An oncology simulation model, from the United States perspective, was developed with a 1-month cycle length that estimates population-level outcomes of PTCL patients based on disease incidence, treatment patterns, PFS, and OS of commonly used regimens for PTCL. Incidence of PTCL, 19.26 cases per 100,000 persons, was derived using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) estimates for NHL in 2020 and the estimated proportion of PTCL cases (~4%) within the NHL category, provided by the Lymphoma Research Foundation. To populate the base case model, treatment patterns following 1L utilization of CHOP (65%) and CHOEP (35%) were varied over time and compared to A+CHP (40%). The model also includes a portion of patients in remission in 1L who are eligible to receive transplant therapy. Additional model inputs were derived from: 1) ECHELON-2, with 5-year PFS rates of 51.4% (95% CI 42.8, 59.4) for A+CHP, 43.0% (95% CI 35.8, 50.0) for CHOP, and OS HR 0.72 (95% 0.53, 0.99); 2) published literature to inform PFS for consolidation and subsequent lines of therapy; and 3) expert clinicians' opinion on commonly used regimens for relapsed/refractory PTCL (included in the model were brentuximab vedotin, romidepsin, pralatrexate, ifosfamide in combination with carboplatin and etoposide [ICE], and gemcitabine-based regimens). Annual prevalence of patients living progression-free with PTCL in the 1L setting with each prescribed scenario was estimated for 10 years (year 2031) with and without the availability of A+CHP. Results The cumulative number of patients with newly diagnosed PTCL between 2026 and 2031 was estimated at 8,020. The number of patients alive and progression-free based on 1L treatment was estimated at 6,304 in a scenario without A+CHP and 7,414 with A+CHP (Δ+1,110, 17.6% increase) in 2031. It was also estimated that 1,203 patients would progress to second-line treatment with CHOP vs 1,119 patients with 1L A+CHP (Δ-84, 7.0% decrease) in 2031. Conclusions The durable and significant improvements in PFS and OS of A+CHP vs CHOP in the 5-year follow-up data from ECHELON-2 estimated an increase in the number of 1L PTCL patients who remain progression free and alive for greater than 10 years. This improvement in outcomes may translate into an increased prevalence of PTCL patients, reflecting an increased number of patients in remission and options to undergo transplant therapy when necessary. Disclosures Burke: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; SeaGen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Beigene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Epizyme: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; X4 Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Kymera: Consultancy; MorphoSys: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy. Yu: Seagen, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bloudek: Seagen, Inc: Consultancy. Liu: Seagen, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fanale: Seagen, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Phillips: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Other: received travel expenses from Incyte, Research Funding; ADCT, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, Incyte, Karyopharm, Morphosys, Pharmacyclics, Seattle Genetics: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Progression-Free Survival Outcomes By Response Status for Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone with or without Daratumumab in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Pooled Subgroup Analysis of Octans and Alcyone

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148937 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1648-1648

Author(s):

Jianxiang Wang ◽

Weijun Fu ◽

Soo-Mee Bang ◽

Honghui Huang ◽

Kihyun Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Primary Analysis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Once Daily ◽

Free Survival ◽

Asian Patients

Abstract Introduction: Daratumumab is a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody that targets CD38 with a direct on-tumor and immunomodulatory mechanism of action. In the primary analysis (median follow-up, 16.5 months) of the global phase 3 ALCYONE trial, daratumumab in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (D-VMP) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus VMP alone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who were ineligible for transplant (median PFS, not reached vs 18.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.65; P<0.001). In the primary analysis (median follow-up, 12.3 months) of the phase 3 OCTANS trial, D-VMP significantly prolonged PFS versus VMP in transplant-ineligible Asian patients with NDMM (median PFS, not reached vs 18.2 months; HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24-0.77; P=0.0033). Here, we present a pooled subgroup analysis of PFS stratified by best response in Asian and global patients from the OCTANS and ALCYONE studies, respectively. Methods: Eligible patients in OCTANS and ALCYONE were ≥18 years of age, were diagnosed with NDMM, and were not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant due to age (≥65 years) or comorbidities. All patients received up to 9 cycles (42-days) of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m 2; subcutaneous) twice weekly on Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5 of Cycle 1 and once weekly on Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5 of Cycles 2 to 9; melphalan (9 mg/m 2; oral) once daily on Days 1 to 4 of each cycle; prednisone (60 mg/m 2; oral) once daily on Days 1 to 4 of each cycle. For patients in the D-VMP group, daratumumab (16 mg/kg, intravenous) was administered once weekly in Cycle 1, once every 3 weeks in Cycles 2 to 9, and once every 4 weeks thereafter until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response over time (at 6, 12, 18, 24, 54 weeks) and disease progression were assessed by a validated computer algorithm in accordance with the IMWG criteria. Minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (10 -5) was assessed by multi-parameter flow cytometry in OCTANS and by next-generation sequencing in ALCYONE. Results: In the OCTANS study, 220 Asian patients were randomized (D-VMP, n=146; VMP, n=74); in the ALCYONE study, 706 global patients were randomized (D-VMP, n=350; VMP, n=356). Median age in OCTANS was 69 (range, 57-84) years and 71 (range 40-93) years in ALCYONE. Patients were pooled from both studies (D-VMP, n=496; VMP, n=430). D-VMP increased the rate of complete response or better (≥CR; 10.2% vs 5.6%) and the rate of very good partial response or better (≥VGPR; 58.5% vs 38.1%) versus VMP after 18 weeks of treatment (Figure A). Responses deepened over time among patients in both the D-VMP and VMP groups, as shown by the ≥CR rate (D-VMP, 38.8%; VMP, 21.6%) and the ≥VGPR rate (D-VMP, 74.0%; VMP, 50.7%) at 54 weeks. At a median follow-up of 12.3 months for OCTANS and 16.5 months for ALCYONE, among patients who achieved a VGPR (D-VMP: n=145 [29.2%]; VMP: n=109 [25.3%]), the median PFS was not reached in the D-VMP group versus 19.9 months in the VMP group (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.36-1.00; P=0.0499; Figure B). All patients who achieved ≥CR with or without MRD negativity (10 -5) demonstrated prolonged PFS, regardless of treatment (≥CR: HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.65-3.65; P=0.3210; ≥CR+MRD negativity: HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.13-3.40; P=0.6225; Figure B); however, more patients treated with D-VMP achieved this level of response (≥CR: D-VMP , n=212 [42.7%]; VMP, n=100 [23.3%]; ≥CR+MRD negativity: D-VMP, n=116 [23.4%]; VMP, n=27 [6.3%]; Figure B). Conclusion: In a pooled analysis of OCTANS and ALCYONE, more patients with transplant-ineligible NDMM achieved deeper responses with D-VMP versus VMP. More patients treated with D-VMP achieved ≥CR with or without MRD negativity compared with those treated with VMP alone, leading to prolonged PFS regardless of treatment. These results support the use of daratumumab in addition to VMP in transplant-ineligible Asian patients with NDMM. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wang: AbbVie: Consultancy; Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Research Funding. Kim: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Li: Suzhou Zelgen Biopharmaceuticals Co.,Ltd.: Honoraria. Chim: Janssen, Takeda & Amgen: Other: received sponsorship for overseas meetings. Rodriguez-Otero: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene-BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; Regeneron: Honoraria; Clínica Universidad de Navarra: Current Employment. Liberati: abbvie, amgen, archigen, beigene, BMS, celgene, DR REDDY'S LABORATORIES SPA, fibrogen, glaxo, Janssen, Karyopharm, Morphosys, Novartis, Onconova, Oncopeptides ab, Roche, Sanophi, Secura Bio, Takeda, Verastem,: Research Funding. Takamatsu: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; SRL: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies, Eisai: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Dimopoulos: BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Beigene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Wroblewski: Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Carson: Janssen: Current Employment. Qi: Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wang: Janssen: Current Employment. Song: Janssen: Current Employment. Jia: Janssen: Current Employment. Yang: Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Liu: Janssen: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Li: Janssen: Current Employment. Zhang: Janssen: Current Employment.

Download Full-text

Rapid and Deep Hematologic Responses Are Associated with Improved Major Organ Deterioration Progression-Free Survival in Newly Diagnosed AL Amyloidosis: Results from Andromeda

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-140514 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 6-7

Author(s):

Ashutosh D. Wechalekar ◽

Giovanni Palladini ◽

Giampaolo Merlini ◽

Raymond L. Comenzo ◽

Arnaud Jaccard ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Light Chains ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Free Survival ◽

Major Organ ◽

End Stage

Background: As immunoglobulin light chains present in AL amyloidosis are considered to be toxic to involved organs, especially the heart, rapid and deep hematologic remission with reduction of these light chains with frontline therapy may be crucial to improving long-term clinical outcomes. ANDROMEDA (NCT03201965) is the first phase 3 study in this patient population to evaluate major organ deterioration progression-free survival (MOD-PFS), a composite endpoint of time to end-stage cardiac disease (requiring cardiac transplant, left ventricular assist device, or intra-aortic balloon pump); end-stage renal disease (requiring hemodialysis or renal transplant); hematologic progression per consensus guidelines1; and death. Here, we report the impact of early and deep hematologic responses on MOD-PFS. Methods: ANDROMEDA is a randomized, open-label, active-controlled phase 3 study of patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis who received cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (VCd) ± daratumumab subcutaneous (DARA SC; DARA 1800 mg coformulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 in 15 mL). Key eligibility criteria were newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis with measurable hematologic disease, ≥1 involved organ, cardiac stage I-IIIA, eGFR ≥20 mL/min, and absence of symptomatic multiple myeloma. Disease evaluations occurred every 4 weeks during Cycles 1-6. Hematologic responses were adjudicated by an Independent Review Committee. Landmark analyses for response were performed at 1 and 3 months (± 7 days). Analyses of hematologic responses and MOD-PFS were performed on the intent-to-treat analysis set. Patients without a baseline or post-baseline assessment were censored at randomization for the MOD-PFS analysis. Hazard ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were estimated based on Cox proportional hazard model. Results: A total of 388 patients were randomized to DARA-VCd (n=195) or VCd alone (n=193). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. The proportions of patients with heart and kidney involvement were 71% and 59%, respectively. Median follow-up was 11.4 months (range, 0.03-21.3+). For the 1- and 3-month landmark analysis, hematologic response was available for 356 and 289 patients, respectively. Hematologic response rates by treatment group at 1 and 3 months are shown in the Table. MOD-PFS was longer in patients with complete response (CR)/very good partial response (VGPR) at 1 and 3 months vs patients with lower levels of response (Figure). CR/VGPR at 1 and 3 months was associated with reduced risk of death or major organ deterioration in a multivariate analysis adjusting for baseline difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains and cardiac stage, (HR: 0.399, P=0.0006 and HR: 0.262, P=0.0003, respectively). At 1 and 3 months, cardiac and renal response rates were higher in those who achieved early and deep hematologic responses (CR and VGPR). Conclusions: CR/VGPR at 1 and 3 months was associated with a reduced risk of major organ deterioration and death in patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis. These data confirm that initial therapy that achieves rapid and deep hematological responses is essential to improving long-term outcomes in AL amyloidosis. Reference 1. Comenzo RL, et al. Leukemia. 2012;26(11):2317-25 Disclosures Wechalekar: Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory; Caelum: Other: Advisory; Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel. Palladini:Celgene: Other: Travel support; Jannsen Cilag: Honoraria, Other. Comenzo:Caleum: Consultancy; Unum: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy, Research Funding. Jaccard:Celgene: Honoraria, Other: A.J. has served in a consulting or advisory role for Janssen and has received honoraria from, received research funding from, and had travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid for or reimbursed by Celgene., Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: A.J. has served in a consulting or advisory role for Janssen and has received honoraria from, received research funding from, and had travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid for or reimbursed by Janssen., Research Funding. Tran:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Pei:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Vasey:Janssen Research & Development: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Tromp:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Weiss:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Vermeulen:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Kastritis:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Time to Progression Post-Induction Predicts Outcomes of Ixazomib Based Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma: Real World Data from a Multi-Site Israeli Registry Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114217 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1972-1972

Author(s):

Yael C Cohen ◽

Hila Magen ◽

Noa Lavi ◽

Moshe E. Gatt ◽

Evgeni Chubar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Target Organ Damage ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Organ Damage ◽

Real World Data ◽

Free Survival ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Indolent Disease

Abstract Introduction Ixazomib is an orally available proteasome inhibitor, shown to be safe and efficacious in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd regimen) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 1-3 prior lines, demonstrating a progression free survival (PFS) benefit which was similar across cytogenetic risk groups (Tourmaline-MM1 phase 3 trial). A European real world data analysis of an IRd named patient program (NPP) outcomes in Greece (n=35), UK (n=46) and Check republic (n=57) showed similar favorable outcomes (Terpos et al, Blood 2017 130:3087). We aimed to analyze outcomes of ixazomib combinations among a multi-site cohort in the Israeli Myeloma registry. Overall response rate (ORR) was classified according to IMWG criteria. Primary endpoint was PFS, secondary endpoints included ORR, overall survival (OS), safety and tolerability. Patients A total of 78 patients across 7 sites, who received at least one cycle of ixazomib combination between June 2013 and June 2018 for treatment of RRMM were retrospectively included. Median age was 68 (range: 38-90). Male/Female ratio was 42/36. ISS (rISS) I/II/II was 30%/42%/27% (25%/54%/15%). Patient received between 1 and 7 prior lines of therapy, 66% received ixazomib in 2nd line, 18% in 3rd line. Overall, 89% of patients had been exposed to PIs (bortezomib 86%) prior to IRd, 41% to IMiDs (thalidomide 28% lenalidomide 22% and pomalidomide 6%), and 35% had undergone autologous transplantation (ASCT). Induction treatment was mostly bortezomib based (85%), most frequently VCD (62%). FISH cytogenetics were available for 60 patients, 29 (48%) had high or intermediate risk aberrations (t(4:14) 12 pts, amp 1q21 12 pts, del17p 9 pts). Disease aggressiveness was classified by treating physician as indolent (rapid control to protect from target organ damage not required) vs aggressive (imminent target organ damage) in 63% vs 27%, respectively. 60 (77%) of the 78 patients received ixazomib via a named patient program, the rest via national or private healthcare provider. Results Median time of follow up from first ixazomib dose was 22 months (range: 1-39 months), and 54 months from diagnosis of myeloma. Treatment is ongoing in 44 (56%) patients with a median duration of 19 months (range: 1-29). Among patients who discontinued treatment, the median duration was 9 months (1-31). Ixazomib was combined with lenalidomide, pomalidomide, and daratumumab in 69%, 9% and 4%, respectively. Overall response rate was 88% - CR 10%, VGPR 36%, PR 42%. Progression free survival was 78% and 54% at 12 and 24 months, respectively (fig1a). A worse PFS was found with physician assessment of aggressive vs indolent disease (14.5 vs 25.9 months, p=0.001), and with post induction progression free period (PFS1) ≤ 24 months vs. >24 months (23.9 vs 31.5 months, p=0.038) (fig 1b); age >=65 trended towards a worse PFS (p=0.058). Poor cytogenetic risk, prior exposure to bortezomib, prior auto transplant, and number of prior lines of therapy did not affect PFS or ORR. OS from first ixazomib administration was 90% and 81% at 12 and 24 months, respectively; median OS was not reached (fig1a). Any (grade 3-4) toxicity considered by investigator as related to ixazomib was reported in 70% (18% grade 3-4), including neutropenia 14% (6%), anemia 19% (6%), thrombocytopenia 17% (5%), nausea and vomiting 17% (1%), DVT/PE 4% (1%), neutropenic infection 0 (4%), peripheral neuropathy 14% (3%), diarrhea 14% (3%), rash 10% (4%), pneumonia 5% (3%). There were no ixazomib related deaths. Dose reduction or discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 28% and 12%, respectively. Conclusion Our data shows ixazomib-based combinations are efficacious and safe regimens for patients with RRMM, achieving ORR of 88%, at 2nd as well as later lines of therapy, regardless to cytogenetic risk. Over a median follow up of almost 2-years, 54% remained progression free at 24 months. An ixazomib based regimen may be particularly attractive for patients who remain progression free for more than 24 months after a bortezomib induction and for patients with a more indolent disease phenotype. Disclosures Cohen: Neopharm Israel: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Medisson Israel: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Tadmor:NOVARTIS: Consultancy; PFIEZER: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy; JNJ: Consultancy; ROCHE: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

MDR1 Gene Expression Predicts Response and Progression-Free Survival Of Ph+ CML Patients On Second-Line Nilotinib Therapy After Imatinib Failure - 4-Year Follow-Up

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1494.1494 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1494-1494

Author(s):

Mridul Agrawal ◽

Benjamin Hanfstein ◽

Philipp Erben ◽

Dominik Wolf ◽

Thomas Ernst ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Mdr1 Gene ◽

Imatinib Resistance ◽

Free Survival ◽

Mdr1 Gene Expression ◽

Mdr1 Expression

Abstract Introduction The activity of the drug efflux transporter protein MDR1 reduces the intracellular concentration of nilotinib and thereby impairs its efficacy. Nilotinib has been shown to be efficacious in imatinib-resistant patients. In the face of competing second-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI), early identification of favorable responders is crucially important. We have reported the unexpected positive prognostic impact of high MDR1 gene expression at time of imatinib resistance for subsequent 2nd line nilotinib treatment. Here, we present (i) a 48-month follow-up of our clinical data and (ii) additional functional analyses studied in an established in vitro, transposon-based vector system with stable siRNA mediated knockdown of MDR1. Aim We sought to assess (i) whether high MDR1 expression remains associated with improved cumulative rates of major molecular remission (MMR), complete cytogenetic remission (CCyR) and patients’ outcome (progression-free survival, PFS) after 48 months and (ii) the impact of MDR1 expression on nilotinib in vitro sensitivity. Methods (i) We analyzed 83 patients resistant to imatinib frontline treatment in chronic phase CML treated with nilotinib 400 mg bid within the CAMN107A2101 trial. MDR1 and BCR-ABL mRNA expression levels were determined by qRT-PCR using LightCycler™ technology, normalized against beta-glucuronidase (GUS) and standardized according to the international scale (IS). Log-rank tests were performed to compare PFS and the cumulative incidences (CI) of MMR and CCyR at 48 months. (ii) MDR1high overexpressing (K562-DoxH1) and MDR1low knockdown (K562-DoxMM) cell lines were used for in vitro testing (Rumpold et al., Exp Hematol 2005). Results (i) (a) At 24 and 48 months, patients with MDR1/GUS ratios ≥2.0 attained MMR in 39% and 41%, CCyR in 58% (at both time points), and PFS rates of 75% and 67%, whereas patients with initial MDR1/GUS ratios <2.0 had significantly worse response and PFS rates, i.e. MMR in 13% and 16% (p=0.014), CCyR in 35% and 39% (p=0.044), and PFS of 50% and 46% (p=0.032). (b) BCR-ABL tumor burden prior to nilotinib revealed a significant impact on molecular response rates. BCR-ABLIS <28% separated best concerning cumulative incidences of MMR by 24 and 48 months (41% vs 21% and 48% vs 21%, p=0.009). (c) Nilotinib in vitro sensitivity of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations at time of imatinib resistance was associated with improved PFS under nilotinib therapy: patients without any mutation showed PFS rates of 71% and 63% at 24 and 48 months, whereas those with either sensitive mutations, intermediately sensitive mutations or mutations with unknown IC50attained PFS rates of 67% and 61%; patients with mutations resistant to nilotinib achieved PFS rates of 23% at both time points (p=0.01). (ii) Even though MDR1high K562 cells are less sensitive than MDR1low expressing cells, nilotinib (applying doses from 0.01 µM up to 0.5 µM) was still able to significantly impede proliferation of both MDR1high and MDR1low, whereas imatinib-mediated growth inhibition was only seen in MDR1low, but not in MDR1highcells. Conclusion (i) At the time of imatinib-resistance, a high MDR1 gene expression predicts favorable MMR, CCyR, and PFS on consecutive 2nd line nilotinib treatment. As shown earlier, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within MDR1 (1236CT/TT and 2677GT/TT) were significantly associated with higher MDR1 expression. (Agrawal et al., ASH 2010) (ii) Our functional data support our clinical observation that nilotinib remains efficacious in MDR1 overexpressing cells, whereas even dose-escalated imatinib does not reverse resistance. High MDR1 gene expression might select patients whose mode of resistance is essentially determined by increased efflux activity of MDR1 and not by other pathways of resistance that cannot be overcome by nilotinib. Altogether, our data might be used for the clinical risk stratification in case of imatinib resistance before switching to nilotinib and are undergoing prospective validation within the ENEST1st study. Disclosures: Saussele: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Other; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel, Travel Other; Pfizer: Honoraria. Purkayasatha:Novartis: Employment. Woodman:Novartis: Employment. Hehlmann:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Hochhaus:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Other; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria. Müller:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Follow-up Analysis of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Routine Clinical Practice

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148836 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2716-2716

Author(s):

Jiri Minarik ◽

Jakub Radocha ◽

Alexandra Jungova ◽

Jan Straub ◽

Tomas Jelinek ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Practice ◽

Research Funding ◽

Previous Analysis ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Routine Clinical Practice ◽

Toxicity Profile ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background: The addition of ixazomib to the doublet lenalidomide and dexamethasone (RD) in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) has shown significant benefit in progression free survival (PFS) in the TOURMALINE-MM1 study. Several real-world data including our previous analysis confirmed that the combination IRD is feasible and with fair outcomes even outside the clinical trial. Here we report an updated analysis which is aimed at overall survival (OS) and the PFS2 interval which is defined as the time from the date of treatment initiation to the date of first documentation of progressive disease after initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or death from any cause. Methods: We analyzed a cohort of 344 patients with RRMM, 127 being treated by IRD and 217 by RD combination. The group characteristics and study design are described elsewhere. 1 The median follow-up of the whole cohort was 28.5 months. The primary endpoint was OS, OS in patients with relapse 1-3, progression free survival (PFS), and PFS2. Secondary endpoints were response rates and toxicity profile. For statistical analysis we used Fisher's exact test or Mann-Whitney U test. Survival measures were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier methodology, and statistical significance was assessed using the log-rank test at a significance level of α = 0.05 (all tests two-sided). Results: The outcomes of OS in the whole cohort were already published before, with significantly longer median OS in the IRD vs RD cohort (mOS 36.6 months vs 26.0 months, p = 0.008).1 In the follow-up analysis, the medians were slightly improved, maintaining a significant difference (mOS 40.9 vs 27.1 months, p = 0.001). In patients treated within relapse 1-3, the results outcomes were even more pronounced (mOS 51.7 vs 27.8 months, p ˂ 0.001). The median PFS was also better in the IRD cohort (mPFS 17.5 vs 12.5 months, p = 0.013) but the results did not substantially differ from our previous analysis. The median PFS2 in the IRD vs RD cohort was significantly longer in the IRD cohort (mPFS2 29.8 vs 21.6 months, p = 0.016). The subsequent therapy included mostly pomalidomide (27.5% vs 30.8%), bortezomib (28.8% vs 28.2%) or thalidomide (10.0% vs 16.2%). Monoclonal antibodies (daratumumab, isatuximab) were more frequently used after IRD combination (21.3% vs 4.3%). The response rates in the IRD vs RD cohort were similar as in our primary analysis: overall response rate (ORR) 73.0% vs 66.8%, with significant difference in very good partial response and better (VGPR+) 38.1% vs 26.3%. The toxicity profile did not reveal any additional safety concerns. Majority of grade 3+ toxicities included hematological toxicity (anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia) and infections, with similar distribution in the cohorts. Conclusion: The treatment of RRMM using the full oral IRD regimen in routine clinical practice is easy, safe and with significantly improved outcomes in comparison to RD doublet. Our follow-up analysis confirmed the impact on OS in patients in the whole cohort including relapse 1-3. The median PFS2 was also longer in the IRD cohort, possibly affected by more frequent use of monoclonal antibodies in the next treatment. With support of AZV 17-29343A, NV18-03-00500, MH CZ - DRO (FNOl, 00098892), IGA-LF-2021-001. 1) Minarik J, Pika T, Radocha J. et al. Survival benefit of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRD) over lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients in routine clinical practice. BMC Cancer 2021; 21: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07732-1 Disclosures Minarik: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hajek: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharma MAR: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of Venetoclax-Based Treatment in Elderly CLL Patients: A Retrospective Study from the Filo Group

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-149640 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3747-3747

Author(s):

Charlotte Doublet ◽

Marie-Sarah Dilhuydy ◽

Emmanuelle Ferrant ◽

Pierre Feugier ◽

Alexandra Fayault ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Retrospective Study ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Oncology Nurses ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Daily Dose ◽

History Of

Abstract Median age at diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia is 72 years. However, only few patients over 80 years of age are included in clinical trials, even in those devoted to unfit patients. In order to evaluate both efficiency and safety of venetoclax in this category of patients, we conducted a multicentric retrospective study and collected data from 77 CLL patients from 19 FILO centers who started venetoclax after 80 years of age. Median age at venetoclax initiation was 86 years old (81-97). 63% of patients had a history of heart disease, 62% had renal failure (moderate 59% and severe 3%) and 29% had a history of severe infections. Despite their comorbidities and a CIRS greater than 6 in 70% of cases, their autonomy was preserved with a median performans status of 1 (0-4). In this comorbid geriatric population, pretherapeutic geriatric assessment was only performed in a single patient. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (0-6) with an exposure to a BCR inhibitor in 56% of cases. 11q and 17p deletion were found in 39% and 30% of cases respectively, 39% of patients had a complex karyotype and 30% harbored a TP53 mutation. However, in this real life population, these prognostic factors were only performed in half of patients. IGHV mutational status was only available in 11 patients, and 83% of them had unmutated IGHV. At the time of venetoclax initiation, the tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) risk was moderate in 57% of cases and high in 8% of cases. Venetoclax was administered as a single agent (42%) or in association with rituximab (58%). In total, half of the patients were hospitalized at each dose ramp-up, and only 3 patients were treated on outpatient basis. 82% of the cohort was able to reach the daily dose of 400mg. Half of the patients were included in a phone call monitoring program with oncology nurses to pre-emptively manage side effects and foster therapy adherence. The safety study reported 14% of TLS, with 2 discontinuations of treatment within the first month: one of which led to dialysis and the other to death. As in the previously published studies, 25% of patients had infectious complications, and grade 3 haematological and digestive toxicities were reported in 42% and 22% of cases, respectively. The reduction of the daily dose of venetoclax was necessary for 33%. Permanent discontinuation of venetoclax occurred in 40% of subjects, including 29% of early withdrawal (within the first 3 months). Main reasons for discontinuation were intolerance (21%), CLL progression (21%), death (21%) and scheduled treatment discontinuation (10%). The overall response rate was 86%, consisting of 49% of complete response (unconfirmed by bone marrow biopsy) and 37% of partial response. With a median follow-up of 21months, estimated progression free survival and overall survival were 29 and 38 months respectively. Prior exposure to a BCR inhibitor had no impact on progression free survival. To conclude, venetoclax has a manageable safety profile in elderly patients with comorbidities and can induce prolonged responses. Finally, if additional follow-up by oncology nurses seems to be more and more implemented, the pre-therapeutic onco-geriatric evaluation remains underexploited in this population. Disclosures Ferrant: AstraZeneca: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Janssen: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Feugier: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria. Laribi: AstraZeneca: Other: Personal Fees; Le Mans Hospital: Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Jansen: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; IQONE: Other: Personal Fees; Astellas Phama, Inc.: Other: Personal Fees; BeiGene: Other: Personal Fees; Takeda: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding. Tchernonog: JANSSEN: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy; ASTRAZENECA: Consultancy. Dartigeas: Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress. Quinquenel: Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Autologous Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Waldenström Macroglobulinemia: A Single-Centre 18-Year Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150637 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3548-3548

Author(s):

Suzanne O Arulogun ◽

Charalampia Kyriakou ◽

Jackie Horder ◽

Fiona Newrick ◽

Aisha S Patel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Partial Response ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Survival Outcomes ◽

Free Survival ◽

Depth Of Response ◽

Remission Status

Abstract BACKGROUND The role of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia (WM) is not well established, largely due to the paucity of evidence. It remains unclear where ASCT should be placed in the sequence of treatment lines. The debate is stronger in the era of targeted therapies that can achieve prolonged progression free survival (PFS) intervals and expected treatment-free intervals of approximately 4 to 8 years. The goal of this real world analysis was to review response and survival outcomes, and relapse risk factors in WM patients who underwent ASCT in a single WM referral centre. METHODS A retrospective cohort analysis was undertaken of consecutive WM patients treated with ASCT at a single specialist centre between 2003 and 2020. Baseline demographic/biological data, number/types of prior therapies, and pre- and post-ASCT depth of response, were collected from patient records and the WMUK Rory Morrison Registry. The primary aims were to determine depth of response, overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), transplant related mortality (TRM) and relapse-associated mortality. RESULTS A total of 32 patients received ASCT, with a median age at time of ASCT of 57 years (range 40-68 years) and median interval from diagnosis to ASCT of 2.3 years (range 0.5-16.8 years); 14 (43.7%) were male. Prior to ASCT, 11 patients (34%) had received one therapy, 11 patients had 2 lines of treatment (excluding mobilisation), and 10 patients (31%) had received 3 or more therapies. The disease status pre-ASCT was complete remission (CR)/very good partial response (VGPR) in 14 patients (43.7%) and partial response (PR) in 18 patients (56.2%). Conditioning therapy comprised LEAM (Lomustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan; 18 patients, 56.2%), BEAM (Carmustine substituted for Lomustine; 12 patients, 37.5%), or Melphalan only (2, 6.2%). All patients had successful engraftment. Median time from stem cell reinfusion to hospital discharge was 15.5 days (range 13-187 days) in the 24 patients for whom these data were available; 5/24 patients (21%) were discharged >25 days after stem cell reinfusion. Restaging at 100 days post-ASCT showed deepening of response by ASCT in 17 patients (53.1%). CR/VGPR was achieved by 26 patients (81.2%) and PR by 4 patients (12.5%). Two patients (6.2%) experienced disease progression before day 100 post-ASCT (both receiving ASCT in second remission/PR2). At a median follow up of 8.9 years (range 0.1-18 years), the estimated median PFS was 4.5 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.2-5.7 years), with estimated 2-year and 5-year PFS rates of 75% and 35.9%, respectively (Figure 1A). In this small cohort, there was no significant difference in PFS based on age, number of prior lines of treatment, pre-ASCT remission status (CR/VGPR vs PR) or post-ASCT response achieved. At time of analysis, 14/32 patients (43.7%) had died: TRM rate was 6.2% (2 patients died during inpatient admission of ASCT complications), 4 patients (12.5%) died of PD, and 1 patient died of unknown causes. Another 7 patients (21.9%) died of infective causes after the immediate post-ASCT period: the median time from ASCT to death among these patients was 5.5 years (range 0.8-10.8 years). Estimated median OS for the unstratified cohort was 10.8 years (95% CI 7.3-14.3 years), with estimated 2- and 5-year OS rates of 87.5% and 77.5%, respectively (Figure 1B). Overall survival did not differ significantly based on age at time of ASCT, number of therapy lines prior to ASCT, pre-ASCT remission status (CR/VGPR vs PR) or post-ASCT response achieved. One patient (3.1%) underwent ASCT after BTK inhibitor therapy, achieving deepening of response (PR to VGPR) with ASCT and progression free interval of 11 months. CONCLUSION ASCT is a feasible treatment option for patients with relapsed WM, producing deeper responses following salvage therapy and resulting in PFS intervals comparable to other currently available therapeutic options. With the benefit of a long follow up period, performing ASCT at later stages in the treatment course (i.e. following 3 or more prior therapy lines) did not appear to result in inferior survival outcomes; timing of ASCT should therefore be considered on an individual patient basis and in light of other available therapy options for relapsed disease. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Yong: Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Autolus: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria. Wechalekar: Amgen: Research Funding; Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Consultancy; Caelum Biosciences: Other: Clinical Trial Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy. D'Sa: Sanofi: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; BeiGene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Ibrutinib Dose Reduction Does Not Affect Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-111626 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1598-1598

Author(s):

Jorge J. Castillo ◽

Joshua Gustine ◽

Andrew Keezer ◽

Kirsten Meid ◽

Toni Dubeau ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Dose Reduction ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Regression Models ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia ◽

Major Response ◽

Dose Reductions

Abstract Introduction: Ibrutinib is an oral Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor, approved for the treatment of symptomatic Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM). MYD88 and CXCR4 mutations affect progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with WM. In some cases, ibrutinib dose reductions are needed for the management of toxicity. However, it remains unclear if ibrutinib dose reductions adversely affect PFS in WM patients. Methods: We evaluated 217 consecutive patients with the clinicopathological diagnosis of WM who were symptomatic and received treatment with ibrutinib. We analyzed relevant clinical features and their association with the risk of dose reduction, using logistic regression models, as well as PFS using Cox proportional-hazard regression models. Time to events was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: All 217 patients were initiated on ibrutinib monotherapy at the approved dose of 420 mg by mouth (PO) once daily (QD). At a median follow-up of 26 months (95% CI 22-31 months), 159 patients (73%) continued ibrutinib without dose-reduction, while 58 (27%) patients had a decrease in their ibrutinib dose. There was no difference in follow-up between those with and without dose reduction. Of the 58 patients that dose reduced, 45 (78%) were reduced to 280 mg daily; 12 patients (21%) were reduced to 140 mg daily, and 1 (2%) to 140 mg every other day. The median time to ibrutinib dose reduction from 420 mg PO QD to 280 mg PO QD was 155 days (95% CI 89-282 days), and median time to dose reduction from 280 mg PO QD to 140 mg PO QD was 55 days (95% CI 24-260 days). Reasons for ibrutinib dose reduction included cytopenia(s) (n=13; 24%), arrhythmia (n=9; 17%), musculoskeletal discomfort (n=8; 15%), constitutional symptoms (n=6; 11%), skin changes/rash (n=5; 9%), mouth sores (n=4; 7%), gastrointestinal symptoms (n=3; 6%), infections (n=3; 6%), bleeding (n=2; 4%) and transaminase elevation (n=1; 2%). Patients in whom ibrutinib dose reduction was needed were more likely to be older than 65 years (76% vs. 47%; p<0.001), had higher International Prognostic Scoring System for WM (IPSSWM) at ibrutinib initiation (IPSSWM 1, 2 and 3 were 19%, 23% and 58% vs. 24%, 39% and 37%, respectively; p=0.03), and were more likely to have attained a major response (93% v. 69%; p<0.001) than patients in whom ibrutinib dose was not reduced. There were no differences in baseline characteristics including sex, hemoglobin levels, platelet counts, beta-2-microglobulin levels, serum IgM levels, bone marrow involvement, previous treatment, MYD88 and CXCR4 mutational status and time from WM diagnosis to ibrutinib initiation between those with and without dose reduction. Regression analyses showed higher odds of dose reduction occurring in patients >65 years (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.8-7.1; p<0.001) and those who had attained a major response (OR 6.0, 95% CI 2.1-17.5; p=0.001). The median PFS for the entire group was not reached, and the 3-year PFS rate was 76% (95% CI 68-83%). Factors associated with a worse PFS were platelet count <100 K/uL (HR 3.9, 95% CI 1.8-8.7; p=0.001) and CXCR4 mutations (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.5-6.0; p=0.001). Expression of mutated MYD88 (HR 0.01, 95% CI 0.00-0.09; p<0.001) and attainment of major response (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.12-0.43; p<0.001) were associated with a better PFS. Importantly, those who experienced a reduction in their ibrutinib dose showed no significant difference in PFS (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.61-2.35; p=0.61; Figure 1A). There were no differences between patients who reduced to 280 mg PO QD (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.5-2.2; p=0.99) or 140 mg PO QD (HR 1.9, 95% CI 0.7-5.5; p=0.22) versus those without dose reduction (Figure 1B). Conclusion: Ibrutinib dose reduction occurred in 27% of patients with WM, at a median time to dose reduction of 155 days. Patients older than 65 years and those with major responses were more likely to have a dose reduction. With a median follow-up time of 26 months, ibrutinib dose reduction did not significantly impact PFS. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Castillo: Millennium: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy. Hunter:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Treon:Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; BMS: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Combined Treatment of Bortezomib, Continuous Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone Followed By One Year of Maintenance Treatment for Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Prospective Phase II Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4733.4733 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4733-4733

Author(s):

Esther GM Waal de ◽

Linda Munck de ◽

Gerhard Woolthuis ◽

Annet velden Van Der ◽

Yvonne Tromp ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

First Relapse ◽

Grade 3 ◽

One Year

Abstract Introduction: Combination therapy for longer periods but at low dose, also called metronomic scheduling, might be an effective manner to treat patients with relapsing myeloma. In particular if the used agents attack the malignant clone in an alternative manner. Therefore we used the combination of bortezomib, dexametasone and daily low dose of oral cyclophosphamide as an induction regimen followed by one year of maintenance therapy consisting of bortezomib and cyclophosphamide. Methods: Relapsing myeloma patients, bortezomib naïve, were treated with three cycles of 1.3 mg/m2 bortezomib at day 1, 4, 8 and 11, cyclophosphamide 50 mg daily, and 20 mg dexamethasone at day 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 12 followed by three cycles of bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 (day 1, 8, 15 and 2), cyclophosphamide (50 mg) daily and dexamethasone (20 mg) at day 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22 and 23. Maintenance therapy consisting of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 every two weeks and daily dose of 50 mg cyclophosphamide for one year was applied to patients in partial or complete remission. Primary endpoints were toxicity during re-induction and maintenance therapy. Secondary endpoints were response to treatment and progression free and overall survival. Results: 59 patients with relapsing multiple myeloma were included of whom 69% were in first relapse (Table 1). The upfront treatment consisted mainly of thalidomide-based and vincristine-based chemotherapy and 40% of the patients have been treated with an autologous stem cell transplantation. All 6 cycles of induction chemotherapy could be given in 49% of the patients. Premature discontinuation before starting maintenance therapy was due to toxicity (31%), progressive disease (7%), death (7%) or other reasons (6%). Myelosuppression was the most common side effect with WHO grade 3-4 in 31% of the patients. Neuropathy grade 3-4 was observed in 16% of patients, partially due to the fact that bortezomib was given intravenously during the first 2 yrs of the protocol which included 76% of the patients. Maintenance therapy was started in 47% of the patients with a median duration of 7.3 months (range 0.36.-13.4). Grade 3-4 toxicity was observed in 25% of the patients including infections (n=3) and myelosuppression (n=3) which did not resulted in discontinuation of therapy. Median follow up time was 29 months with an overall response of 62%, and a very good partial response (VGPR), complete remission (CR) in 21% and 7% of the patients respectively. During the maintenance phase an improvement in responsiveness was observed in 25% of the patients. The CR rate increased with 9% to a total of 16%. VGPR rate was 20% and 16% of the patient had a PR. At end of the maintenance therapy 50% of patients started with maintenance had stable disease. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 17.2 months (range 0.13 – 43.5) as depicted in figure 1. and the median overall survival was 21.6 months (range 0.46-54.4, figure 2). During follow up 33 % of the patients died due to progression of MM. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that combination therapy with bortezomib, continuous low dose cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone is an effective and manageable regimen. Adding a year of maintenance was feasible with limited side effects and an increase in CR rate. Table 1: patient characteristics Patients (%) Age, mean (min,max) 69 (46-86) Sex Male 56 Female 44 Relapse number First relapse 75 Second relapse 20 Third relapse 5 Performance status 0 65 1 29 2 5 M-protein heavy chain IgA 18 IgG 65 Light chain disease 18 Polyneuropathy No 61 Yes 39 Figure 1: Progression free survival Figure 1:. Progression free survival Figure 2: Overall survival Figure 2:. Overall survival Disclosures Waal de: Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Munck de:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Woolthuis:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. velden Van Der:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Tromp:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Hoogendoorn:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Vellenga:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Hovenga:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding.

Download Full-text