Autologous Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Waldenström Macroglobulinemia: A Single-Centre 18-Year Experience

Abstract BACKGROUND The role of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia (WM) is not well established, largely due to the paucity of evidence. It remains unclear where ASCT should be placed in the sequence of treatment lines. The debate is stronger in the era of targeted therapies that can achieve prolonged progression free survival (PFS) intervals and expected treatment-free intervals of approximately 4 to 8 years. The goal of this real world analysis was to review response and survival outcomes, and relapse risk factors in WM patients who underwent ASCT in a single WM referral centre. METHODS A retrospective cohort analysis was undertaken of consecutive WM patients treated with ASCT at a single specialist centre between 2003 and 2020. Baseline demographic/biological data, number/types of prior therapies, and pre- and post-ASCT depth of response, were collected from patient records and the WMUK Rory Morrison Registry. The primary aims were to determine depth of response, overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), transplant related mortality (TRM) and relapse-associated mortality. RESULTS A total of 32 patients received ASCT, with a median age at time of ASCT of 57 years (range 40-68 years) and median interval from diagnosis to ASCT of 2.3 years (range 0.5-16.8 years); 14 (43.7%) were male. Prior to ASCT, 11 patients (34%) had received one therapy, 11 patients had 2 lines of treatment (excluding mobilisation), and 10 patients (31%) had received 3 or more therapies. The disease status pre-ASCT was complete remission (CR)/very good partial response (VGPR) in 14 patients (43.7%) and partial response (PR) in 18 patients (56.2%). Conditioning therapy comprised LEAM (Lomustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan; 18 patients, 56.2%), BEAM (Carmustine substituted for Lomustine; 12 patients, 37.5%), or Melphalan only (2, 6.2%). All patients had successful engraftment. Median time from stem cell reinfusion to hospital discharge was 15.5 days (range 13-187 days) in the 24 patients for whom these data were available; 5/24 patients (21%) were discharged >25 days after stem cell reinfusion. Restaging at 100 days post-ASCT showed deepening of response by ASCT in 17 patients (53.1%). CR/VGPR was achieved by 26 patients (81.2%) and PR by 4 patients (12.5%). Two patients (6.2%) experienced disease progression before day 100 post-ASCT (both receiving ASCT in second remission/PR2). At a median follow up of 8.9 years (range 0.1-18 years), the estimated median PFS was 4.5 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.2-5.7 years), with estimated 2-year and 5-year PFS rates of 75% and 35.9%, respectively (Figure 1A). In this small cohort, there was no significant difference in PFS based on age, number of prior lines of treatment, pre-ASCT remission status (CR/VGPR vs PR) or post-ASCT response achieved. At time of analysis, 14/32 patients (43.7%) had died: TRM rate was 6.2% (2 patients died during inpatient admission of ASCT complications), 4 patients (12.5%) died of PD, and 1 patient died of unknown causes. Another 7 patients (21.9%) died of infective causes after the immediate post-ASCT period: the median time from ASCT to death among these patients was 5.5 years (range 0.8-10.8 years). Estimated median OS for the unstratified cohort was 10.8 years (95% CI 7.3-14.3 years), with estimated 2- and 5-year OS rates of 87.5% and 77.5%, respectively (Figure 1B). Overall survival did not differ significantly based on age at time of ASCT, number of therapy lines prior to ASCT, pre-ASCT remission status (CR/VGPR vs PR) or post-ASCT response achieved. One patient (3.1%) underwent ASCT after BTK inhibitor therapy, achieving deepening of response (PR to VGPR) with ASCT and progression free interval of 11 months. CONCLUSION ASCT is a feasible treatment option for patients with relapsed WM, producing deeper responses following salvage therapy and resulting in PFS intervals comparable to other currently available therapeutic options. With the benefit of a long follow up period, performing ASCT at later stages in the treatment course (i.e. following 3 or more prior therapy lines) did not appear to result in inferior survival outcomes; timing of ASCT should therefore be considered on an individual patient basis and in light of other available therapy options for relapsed disease. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Yong: Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Autolus: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria. Wechalekar: Amgen: Research Funding; Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Consultancy; Caelum Biosciences: Other: Clinical Trial Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy. D'Sa: Sanofi: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; BeiGene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Chemorefractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.4554.4554 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 4554-4554

Author(s):

Catherine Garnett ◽

Chrissy Giles ◽

Osman Ahmed ◽

Maialen Lasa ◽

Holger W. Auner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 4554 High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is currently standard treatment for younger patients with multiple myeloma, resulting in improved survival and response rate compared to conventional chemotherapy. Disease relapse, however, remains almost inevitable and thus the role of two successive (tandem) autologous stem cell transplants has been evaluated in chemorefractory patients as a means of prolonging duration of disease response. We retrospectively analysed the results of nine patients with chemorefractory disease treated at a single UK institution who received tandem ASCT between January 1998 and February 2009. There were six men and three women. Median age at diagnosis was 56 years (range, 42–65 years). Paraprotein isotype was IgG in eight patients and IgA in one patient. Median serum paraprotein level was 41g/L (range 12–73g/L) at presentation. At time of 1st transplant six patients were in stable disease (SD) and three had evidence of progressive disease. Conditioning melphalan dose was 140mg/m2 in all but two patients who received 110mg/m2 and 200mg/m2. Median time between transplants was 3.7 months (range 2.3–6.4 months) with PR and SD being observed in 2/9 and 7/9 patients at time of 2nd transplant. None of the patients reached complete response (CR). One patient received melphalan 140mg/m2 prior to 2nd transplant. The remaining patients received melphalan 200mg/m2. Median follow up after tandem transplant was 54.3 months (range 15.6 –143.6 months). No treatment related mortality was reported. At the time of analysis, six patients were still alive and under follow up with an overall survival (OS) figure for the group of 52% at 10 years from diagnosis (Figure 1). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 20 months from 2nd transplant (range 6.7–62.6 months) (Figure 2). Tandem autologous stem cell transplant in chemorefractory patients has resulted in overall survival similar to autologous stem cell transplant in chemosensitive patients and should be considered in patients with chemorefractory disease. Figure 1: Overall survival from diagnosis in patients receiving tandem autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma Figure 1:. Overall survival from diagnosis in patients receiving tandem autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma Figure 2: Progression free survival following tandem transplant Figure 2:. Progression free survival following tandem transplant Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Combined Treatment of Bortezomib, Continuous Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone Followed By One Year of Maintenance Treatment for Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Prospective Phase II Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4733.4733 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4733-4733

Author(s):

Esther GM Waal de ◽

Linda Munck de ◽

Gerhard Woolthuis ◽

Annet velden Van Der ◽

Yvonne Tromp ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

First Relapse ◽

Grade 3 ◽

One Year

Abstract Introduction: Combination therapy for longer periods but at low dose, also called metronomic scheduling, might be an effective manner to treat patients with relapsing myeloma. In particular if the used agents attack the malignant clone in an alternative manner. Therefore we used the combination of bortezomib, dexametasone and daily low dose of oral cyclophosphamide as an induction regimen followed by one year of maintenance therapy consisting of bortezomib and cyclophosphamide. Methods: Relapsing myeloma patients, bortezomib naïve, were treated with three cycles of 1.3 mg/m2 bortezomib at day 1, 4, 8 and 11, cyclophosphamide 50 mg daily, and 20 mg dexamethasone at day 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 12 followed by three cycles of bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 (day 1, 8, 15 and 2), cyclophosphamide (50 mg) daily and dexamethasone (20 mg) at day 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22 and 23. Maintenance therapy consisting of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 every two weeks and daily dose of 50 mg cyclophosphamide for one year was applied to patients in partial or complete remission. Primary endpoints were toxicity during re-induction and maintenance therapy. Secondary endpoints were response to treatment and progression free and overall survival. Results: 59 patients with relapsing multiple myeloma were included of whom 69% were in first relapse (Table 1). The upfront treatment consisted mainly of thalidomide-based and vincristine-based chemotherapy and 40% of the patients have been treated with an autologous stem cell transplantation. All 6 cycles of induction chemotherapy could be given in 49% of the patients. Premature discontinuation before starting maintenance therapy was due to toxicity (31%), progressive disease (7%), death (7%) or other reasons (6%). Myelosuppression was the most common side effect with WHO grade 3-4 in 31% of the patients. Neuropathy grade 3-4 was observed in 16% of patients, partially due to the fact that bortezomib was given intravenously during the first 2 yrs of the protocol which included 76% of the patients. Maintenance therapy was started in 47% of the patients with a median duration of 7.3 months (range 0.36.-13.4). Grade 3-4 toxicity was observed in 25% of the patients including infections (n=3) and myelosuppression (n=3) which did not resulted in discontinuation of therapy. Median follow up time was 29 months with an overall response of 62%, and a very good partial response (VGPR), complete remission (CR) in 21% and 7% of the patients respectively. During the maintenance phase an improvement in responsiveness was observed in 25% of the patients. The CR rate increased with 9% to a total of 16%. VGPR rate was 20% and 16% of the patient had a PR. At end of the maintenance therapy 50% of patients started with maintenance had stable disease. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 17.2 months (range 0.13 – 43.5) as depicted in figure 1. and the median overall survival was 21.6 months (range 0.46-54.4, figure 2). During follow up 33 % of the patients died due to progression of MM. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that combination therapy with bortezomib, continuous low dose cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone is an effective and manageable regimen. Adding a year of maintenance was feasible with limited side effects and an increase in CR rate. Table 1: patient characteristics Patients (%) Age, mean (min,max) 69 (46-86) Sex Male 56 Female 44 Relapse number First relapse 75 Second relapse 20 Third relapse 5 Performance status 0 65 1 29 2 5 M-protein heavy chain IgA 18 IgG 65 Light chain disease 18 Polyneuropathy No 61 Yes 39 Figure 1: Progression free survival Figure 1:. Progression free survival Figure 2: Overall survival Figure 2:. Overall survival Disclosures Waal de: Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Munck de:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Woolthuis:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. velden Van Der:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Tromp:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Hoogendoorn:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Vellenga:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Hovenga:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Phase 3 Ibrutinib Results Versus Standard of Care in Sweden in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1751.1751 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1751-1751 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Anders Österborg ◽

Anna Asklid ◽

Joris Diels ◽

Johanna Repits ◽

Frans Söltoft ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Research Funding ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Free Survival ◽

Line Of Therapy

Abstract Background Ibrutinib (Ibr), an oral, first-in-class covalent Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, showed in the Phase 3 RESONATE trial significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS, hazard ratio [HR] =0.22, p<0.001) and overall survival (OS, HR=0.39,p=0.001) compared with ofatumumab (ofa) in patients with previously treated CLL who were not eligible for chemoimmunotherapy (Byrd et al, NEJM 2013). Long-term follow-up data from a single arm Phase 2 study have also demonstrated that patients treated with ibrutinib have long durable responses with a PFS at 2.5 years of 69% (Byrd et al, Blood 2015). While ofatumumab is a licensed comparator and included in treatment guidelines, some Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies require comparisons with a wider range of treatments. In the absence of direct head-to-head comparison of single-agent ibrutinib with other frequently used treatments in this patient population, additional comparative evidence against standard of care as observed in clinical practice can provide useful insights on the relative efficacy of ibrutinib. Naïve (unadjusted) comparisons of outcomes from different sources are prone to bias due to confounding, as treatment assignments were not randomly assigned, and populations can vary in important prognostic factors. The objective of this analysis was to compare the relative efficacy of Ibr versus physician's choice in R/R CLL-patients based on patient-level data from RESONATE pooled with an observational cohort, adjusting for confounders using multivariate statistical modelling. Methods Patient-level data from the Phase 3 RESONATE trial (Ibr: n=195; ofa: n=196) were pooled with data from a retrospective observational study conducted in the Stockholm area in Sweden. This retrospective study collected efficacy and safety data from a detailed, in-depth retrospective review of individual patient files from 148 consecutively identified patients with R/R CLL initiated on second or later line treatment between 2002 and 2013 at the four CLL-treating centers in Stockholm, Sweden, with complete follow-up. Longitudinal follow-up in subsequent treatment lines was available for patients in 3rd (n=91), 4th (n=51), 5th (n=29), and 6+ (n=15) line, and as such individual patients could contribute information to the analysis for multiple lines of therapy, with baseline defined as the date of initiation of the actual treatment line. A multivariate cox proportional hazards model was developed to compare PFS and OS between treatments, including line of therapy, age, gender, Binet stage, ECOG, and refractory disease as covariates. Adjusted HRs and 95% CIs are presented vs. Ibr. Results Across all treatment lines, fludarabine-cyclophosphamide (FC) (n=64), chlorambucil (n=59), alemtuzumab (n=33), FC+rituximab (FCR) (n=30), bendamustine+rituximab (BR) (n=28), and other rituximab-based combination chemotherapy (n=28) were the most frequently used treatments. Line of therapy, age and gender, Binet stage, ECOG performance status, and refractory disease were all independent risk factors for worse outcome on both PFS and OS. The adjusted HR for PFS and OS pooled observational data versus Ibr were 6.80 [4.72;9.80] (p<0.0001) and 2.90 [1.80;4.69] (p<0.0001). HR's for PFS/OS versus most frequent treatment regimens ranged between 2.50/1.82 (FCR) and 14.00/5.34 (anti-CD20 Mab). Baseline adjusted results for the Ofa-arm in RESONATE were comparable for both PFS and OS to outcome data from the consecutive historical cohort, however OS outcomes for Ofa were partly confounded by cross-over to Ibr. Conclusions Comparison of results from the Phase 3 RESONATE study with treatments used as part of previous standard of care in a well-defined cohort of consecutive Swedish patients shows that ibrutinib is superior to physician's choice in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL, suggesting a more than 6 fold improvement in PFS and almost 3 fold improvement in OS. Results were consistent across all different physician chosen treatments and provides further evidence that ibrutinib improves both PFS and OS vs current and prior standard of care regimens. Figure 1. Adjusted Hazard ratio's for PFS and OS of physician's choice versus Ibrutinib (RESONATE) (Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression) a. Progression-free survival b. Overall survival Figure 1. Adjusted Hazard ratio's for PFS and OS of physician's choice versus Ibrutinib (RESONATE) (Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression). / a. Progression-free survival b. Overall survival Disclosures Österborg: Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Asklid:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Diels:Janssen: Employment. Repits:Janssen Cilag: Employment. Söltoft:Janssen Cilag: Employment. Hansson:Jansse Cilag: Research Funding. Jäger:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Early Consolidation with Myeloablative Radiochemotherapy Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in First Remission Significantly Prolongs Progression-Free Survival in Mantle Cell Lymphoma - Long Term Follow up of a Prospective Randomized Trial of the European MCL Network.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v104.11.7.7 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 104 (11) ◽

pp. 7-7 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Martin H. Dreyling ◽

Georg Lenz ◽

Eva Schiegnitz ◽

Achiel van Hoof ◽

Christian Gisselbrecht ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Advanced Stage ◽

Free Survival ◽

Mantle Cell ◽

First Remission

Abstract Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a distinct subtype of malignant lymphoma with an especially poor prognosis and a median survival of only 3–4 years. In 1996, the European MCL Network initiated a randomized trial to improve the otherwise dismal outcome of MCL, comparing early consolidation with myeloablative radiochemotherapy (TBI 12 gray, cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg bw) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) to a conventional a -interferon maintenance (6x106 IE IFNa 3x weekly) in first remission after a CHOP-like induction regimen. Until March 2004, a total of 269 previously untreated patients (up to 65 years) were randomized upfront. 189 (82%) of 230 patients with advanced stage MCL completed initial induction chemotherapy and 142 (75%) achieved either a complete (45 pts., 24%) or partial response (97 pts, 51%). 122 pts proceeded to consolidation therapy, 62 pts received ASCT consolidation and 60 patients were assigned to IFN maintenance. Patients in the ASCT study arm experienced a significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) as compared to patients in the IFNa arm. The PFS at 2 years was 73% after ASCT as compared to only 43% in the IFNa arm (p = 0.0108). Similar results were achieved in the intent to treat analysis of all initially randomised MCL patients (p=0.0001). Accordingly, this advantage resulted in a trend towards an improved overall survival (OS) in the ASCT arm. After a follow-up of up to nearly 7 years (median follow-up of patients: 2.8 years), 3 year survival after ASCT was 83% in comparison to 77% under IFNa maintenance (p = 0.18). As expected, acute toxicity was higher in the ASCT group with an early mortality of 4.8%, whereas long-term effects were more frequently encountered under IFNa maintenance. Conclusion : In first line treatment of advanced stage MCL, dose-intensified consolidation with myeloablative radiochemotherapy followed by ASCT after CHOP-like induction results in a significant prolongation of PFS. Current study concepts evaluate the benefits of combined immuno-chemotherapy to further improve the overall survival.

Download Full-text

Disease-Management of Low- and Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Report on 800 Newly Diagnosed MDS Patients From the European LeukemiaNet MDS Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2917.2917 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2917-2917 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Louise de Swart ◽

Alex Smith ◽

Pierre Fenaux ◽

Argyris Symeonidis ◽

Eva Hellström-Lindberg ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Disease Management ◽

Serum Ferritin ◽

Research Funding ◽

Iron Chelation ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Free Survival ◽

The Mean

Abstract Abstract 2917 Background: The European LeukemiaNet MDS (EUMDS) registry is designed to collect information about the demographics and disease-management of newly diagnosed low-risk and intermediate-1 risk MDS patients. From April 2008 until July 2010, 828 patients have been registered in eleven participating countries through a web-based reporting system. Objectives: This report describes the disease-management of the first 800 registered patients, including transfusion-related issues like secondary iron overload and its treatment. Results: 159 of 800 patients (20%) started MDS specific treatment within three months before registration; this percentage increased to 50% at 18 months of follow-up. Most patients received erythroid-stimulating agents (ESA), like erythropoietin (Table 1). In patients with a clinical indication for ESA, the percentage of transfusion-independency was similar to the transfusion-independent group without indication for ESA at 18 months of follow-up (Table 1). Overall, 27% of the patients received blood transfusions at registration. This percentage remained stable during follow-up, probably due to the therapeutic effect of ESA (Table 1). The number of units transfused, per 6 months, in these patients increased from 5 to 13 units at 18 months of follow-up, with a mean pre-transfusion Hb level of 7.6 g/dL. The serum ferritin levels of the transfusion-dependent patients at registration were available in 159 patients. The serum ferritin level at registration was ≥2000 μg/L in 4% of the patients who received a mean number of 10 units (SD 7). This increased to 28% of the patients who received a mean number of 20 units (SD 11) at 18 months of follow-up. The percentage of patients on iron chelation therapy increased from 1% to 9% during follow-up (Table 1). In these patients the mean serum ferritin levels remained stable: 1913 μg/L (SD 1183) at registration and 1626 μg/L (SD 1232) at 18 months of follow-up. In contrast, transfusion-dependent patients not treated with iron chelation or ESA had increasing ferritin levels, with a mean ferritin of 630 μg/L (SD 597) at registration and 1586 μg/L (SD 1017) at 18 months of follow-up. 37 patients (5%) progressed to high-risk MDS or acute myeloblastic leukemia at a median of 155 days from registration. 62 patients (8%) have died within a median of 269 days from registration, 32 deaths were MDS related. The overall survival was 93% at 18 months of follow-up, with a progression-free survival of 90%. Differences in overall survival between transfusion-independent and transfusion-dependent patients were significant: 97% versus 85%, respectively (p<0.0001; Table 2). In the multivariate analysis transfusion-dependency, ferritin levels and IPSS score predicted survival (Table 2). The IPSS score had a significant prognostic impact on overall survival and progression-free survival in contrast to the WHO classification (Data not shown). Conclusions: Despite a high transfusion load the mean serum ferritin levels remained stable during treatment with iron chelation. Transfusion-dependent patients had a worse overall survival and progression-free survival with higher ferritin levels and higher IPSS score as compared to transfusion-independent patients. This report demonstrates the importance of detailed disease-management in low- and intermediate-1 risk MDS patients. Disclosures: Fenaux: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; ROCHE: Honoraria, Research Funding; AMGEN: Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cephalon: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bowen:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AMGEN: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Rituximab Purging and Maintenance Improves Progression Free Survival but Not Overall Survival In Patients with Relapsed or Resistant Follicular Lymphoma Prior Receiving An Autologous Transplant

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.3567.3567 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 3567-3567 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Ruth Pettengell ◽

Norbert Schmitz ◽

Christian Gisselbrecht ◽

Graeme Smith ◽

William N Patton ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Phase Ii Trials ◽

Free Survival ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Autologous Transplant

Abstract Abstract 3567 Autologous transplantation significantly improves the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with relapsed or resistant follicular (rFL) lymphoma compared with chemotherapy alone (Schouten H, et al. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:3918–27). Small phase II trials suggest, that rituximab (R) given peritransplant further improves survival outcome. Whilst the role of maintenance R post chemotherapy in FL is established, the benefit and safety of maintenance R following autologous transplant is unknown. In this randomised prospective study the efficacy and safety of R as in vivo purging pretransplant and as maintenance treatment immediately post transplant was assessed. From Oct 1999 to Apr 2006, 280 of a planned 420 R naïve patients with rFL in first (n=16), second (n= 222) or third remission (n=41) who achieved either a complete remission (n=83) or a very good partial remission (n=196) to induction chemotherapy, with limited bone marrow infiltration (<25% B-lymphocytes) underwent a single randomisation in a 2 × 2 design to R purging 375 mg/m2 weekly × 4 (RP) before high-dose therapy with BEAM conditioning (HDC) and maintenance R 375 mg/m2 every 3 months for 2 years (RM). The primary endpoint of the study was PFS. All analysis is by intention to treat. The median age was 51 years (range: 26–70), and baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. On average patients were 44.1 (range 3.4–463.8) months from diagnosis with 79.3% having 2 lines of therapy and 15% three lines of prior therapy. Patients were equally distributed between low, intermediate and high FLIPI scores. Pretransplant 70% of patients were in PR and 30% in CR. Fifty seven patients failed to mobilise peripheral blood stem cells. Nineteen patients withdrew, 5 due to toxicity, 9 were ineligible. In the 196 (70%) patients transplanted, neutrophil engraftment > 0.5 × 109 /L was prompt, median 14.3 days (range 10–115) and platelets > 50 × 109/L,median 25.1 days (range 9–190). Time to engraftment and early or late toxicities did not differ significantly between the groups apart from a lower neutrophil count at 3 months in patients on maintenance. No graft failures or late neutropenia was reported. Transplant related mortality was 0.5%. Only 3 infection related deaths have been reported post 100 days. Two hundred and seventeen patients are alive on continued follow-up. Median follow-up is 6.4 years. PFS at 5 years was 62.9% for patients receiving RP + RM versus 37.6 % for patients receiving no R (logrank PFS; p=0.004; HR 0.76, 95%CI: 0.66 – 0.93). OS at 5 years was 79.5% % versus 78.4 % for patient receiving RP + RM versus no R (logrank PFS; p>0.1). Multivariate analysis was not able to define a high or low risk patient group. R in vivo purging and maintenance results in superior PFS compared to no R. R does not adversely affect peripheral blood stem cell harvesting or engraftment and maintenance R post transplant is safe. The impressive OS suggests that relapsed FL patients can be effectively salvaged post R purging and maintenance. R Purging + R Maintenance R Maintenance R Purging No R Pt number 69 69 72 70 Median PFS NR@ 6.4 y 7.23 y 4.03 y 3.34 y 5y PFS 62.9 % 56 % 46 % 37.6 % 5y OS 79.5 % 80.5 % 84.8 % 78.4 % Disclosures: Pettengell: Roche: Honoraria. Schmitz:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Gisselbrecht:Roche: Research Funding. Walewski:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Geisler:Roche: Research Funding. Kimby:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldstone:Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Outcomes in Advanced-Stage Plasmablastic Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153854 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2519-2519

Author(s):

Sophia Lee ◽

Christen Dillard ◽

Raphael E Steiner ◽

Babak Soltanalizadeh ◽

Lei Feng ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Plasmablastic Lymphoma ◽

Advanced Stage ◽

First Line ◽

Free Survival ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy

Abstract Introduction: Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is a rare subtype of non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma (NHL), often characterized by immunoblastic morphology and plasmacytic immunophenotype. PBL was initially described in HIV-positive patients (pts) and is now often diagnosed in post-transplant and HIV-negative pts with other immunodeficiency. Pts with limited stage disease treated with induction chemotherapy and consolidative radiotherapy have a good prognosis; however, pts with advanced stage have poor outcome. Previously studied treatment regimens vary and include CHOP (cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone), HyperCVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, Adriamycin, dexamethasone alternating with methotrexate and cytarabine), and DA-EPOCH (etoposide, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, prednisone) with or without radiation and autologous stem cell transplant, with no current standard therapy, largely due to the rarity of PBL. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of pts diagnosed with PBL between April 2003 and August 2020 to describe outcomes for pts treated at our center over the past 2 decades. We hope to use this to improve outcomes with novel therapies in the future. We evaluated the baseline demographics, stage, therapy, response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We used descriptive statistics including mean, standard deviation, median, and range for continuous variables, and frequency counts and percentages for categorical variables. Best response and its 95% exact confidence interval were calculated. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the time-to-event endpoints including progression free survival, and overall survival. Results: 39 pts with PBL were identified, with a median age of 51 years (range 27-91). 16 were HIV+, and 5 were on immunosuppression for autoimmune disease (2), infectious hepatitis (2), or liver transplant (1); the other 18 had no apparent immunosuppression other than advanced age (defined as 70 years and older) in 13. Among those with HIV, 14 were on antiretroviral therapy at time of diagnosis of PBL. The median CD4 count was 140 (range 15-391) and 5 patients had an active viral load. 24 pts were EBV/EBER positive. 6 pts had stage III disease and 33 had stage IV disease. The primary sites of disease included head and neck (13), lymph node (7), gastrointestinal tract (6), other soft tissue (3), abdomen (3), breast (2), gynecologic (2), skin (2), and bone (1). The median LDH was 629 IU/L (313-618). A serum protein electrophoresis was checked in 21 pts and the median was 1.4 g/dL (range 0.2-2.6 g/dL, normal = 0). A beta 2 microglobulin was checked in 28 pts and the median was 3.95 (range 2.55-10.4, normal =0.8 to 2.3 mg/L). The median Ki-67 proliferation index was 85%, and the PBL cells were invariably CD20 negative. 12 cases showed MYC overexpression; 2 had MYC rearrangement by FISH. 32 pts received systemic therapy and were evaluable with 2 median lines of treatment (range 1-6). First line therapy included Hyper-CVAD (n=7), CHOP (n=3), EPOCH (n=19), and other (n=3). The antimyeloma therapy, bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, was added to EPOCH for 4 patients or used with dexamethasone in one pt, while the CD38 antibody daratumumab was added to hypercytoxan for the first cycle of an elderly pt with poor performance status (PS). He responded well with improvement in his PS, and subsequently completed 5 cycles of DA-EPOCH and remains in CR. After first line therapy, 59% pts achieved complete response, 13% partial response, and 9% stable disease. 20 pts received intrathecal chemotherapy, 9 pts received radiation, and 8 pts underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (7 as consolidation and 1 at relapse). Please see figure for PFS and OS based on different treatment modalities. Median PFS and OS were 21 and 35.2 months, respectively. Median follow up time was 25.85 months. Conclusions: The majority of our pts (87%) with advanced stage PBL were immunocompromised with HIV (16), requiring immunosuppression (5), or elderly (13). Despite a 56% CR rate with induction, 69% of patients relapsed. Median PFS was less than 2 years and OS was less than 3 years. The dismal outcomes of pts with PBL suggests that this rare and aggressive subtype of NHL with plasmacytic differentiation requires further evaluation with therapies against plasma cell directed antigens such as CD38, BCMA or SLAMF7. *S Lee & C Dillard contributed equally. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Steiner: BMS: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Loghavi: Abbvie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Curio Sciences: Honoraria; Gerson Lehrman Group: Consultancy; Guidepoint: Consultancy; Peerview: Honoraria; Qualworld: Consultancy. Ahmed: Seagen: Research Funding; Tessa Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding. Patel: Pfizer: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Analysis of 179 Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Treated with Novel Agents Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT): a Retrospective Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1343.1343 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1343-1343

Author(s):

Joyce Habib ◽

Neil Dunavin ◽

Gary Phillips ◽

Patrick Elder ◽

Meaghan Tranovich ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Overall Survival ◽

High Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Novel Agents ◽

Genetic Profile ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 1343 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematological malignancy in the United States with an estimated 20,580 new cases in 2009. Over the past decade, the introduction of novel agents (thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib) have played a pivotal role in improving response rates, duration of response, overall survival (OS) and quality of life. In this study we describe a single center experience with novel agents used for induction followed by high dose chemotherapy (HDT) and first autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in patients with MM. Method: A retrospective review of the medical records of 179 newly diagnosed patients with MM seen between October 2006 and December 2009 at The Ohio State University was performed. All patients received novel therapy containing thalidomide, bortezomib or lenalidomide as part of an induction regimen followed by ASCT. All patients received melphalan 140mg/m2 or 200mg/m2 as preparative regimen. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to plot progression free survival and overall survival. Results: Of the 181 patients seen, 2 were excluded because they did not receive a novel agent as part of induction treatment. Of the 179 patients analyzed, median age was 56.8 years (29-80) with 30% of patients older than 60 years. African American represented 19%. Fifty-nine percent were male, 80% had Durie-Salmon (DS) stage III while 25%, 28%, 18% represented International prognostic score (IPS) stage I, II, and III respectively with 27% unknown. Median comorbidity index score was 2 (2-7) and median Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was 90% (70-100). Thirty percent had high risk genetic profile, and 73% received one line of treatment before ASCT. The median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 8.33 months (4-58). The overall response rate (ORR) prior to transplant was 84% (9% complete (CR), 29% very good partial (VGPR), and 46% partial (PR)). The ORR post ASCT was 89% (CR 45%, VGPR 22%, PR 21%). Non relapse mortality was 1% and 3% at 100 days and 1 year respectively. At a median follow up of 31 months (7-90), 69 patients (38%) had relapsed. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 29 months with 1 and 3 years PFS of 79.3% and 61.5% respectively (Fig. 1). The OS was not reached. One and 3 years OS were 93% and 88% respectively (Fig. 1). Univariate analysis showed that time to transplant > 12 months was associated with poor outcome and decreased overall survival (HR 3.30, p = 0.008). High risk genetic profile was also found to be associated with decreased overall survival although this was not statistically significant (HR 2.31, p = 0.070). Multivariate analysis found that only time to transplant > 12 months was an independent predictor of decreased OS. Significant predictors for disease progression were high risk genetic profile and time to transplant > 12 months in patients receiving 2 or more treatments before ASCT. Conclusion: Induction with novel agents followed by HDT and ASCT improves CR rate, in our case from 9% to 45%. Median PFS (29 months) was comparable to other published data. OS was not been reached after a median follow up of 31 months. Predictors of progression include high risk genetic profile and time to transplant > 12 months. The only significant predictor for survival was time to transplant. Our study suggests that an early transplant may improve OS and PFS. An extended analysis will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Phillips: NCI/NIH: Research Funding; NCCM Grant: Research Funding; ARRA RC2 Grant: Research Funding. Byrd:Genzyme Corporation: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

High-Dose Chemotherapy with Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Support for Relapsed or Refractory Primary CNS Lymphoma - a Prospective Multicentre Trial By the German Cooperative PCNSL Study Group

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.781.781 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 781-781

Author(s):

Benjamin Kasenda ◽

Gabriele Ihorst ◽

Roland Schroers ◽

Agnieszka Korfel ◽

Ingo GH Schmidt-Wolf ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Primary Cns Lymphoma ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

High Dose Chemotherapy ◽

Cns Lymphoma ◽

High Dose ◽

Free Survival ◽

High Dose Cytarabine

Abstract Purpose To investigate safety and efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HCT-ASCT) in patients with relapsed or refractory primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). Patients and methods We conducted a single-arm multicentre phase 2 study for immunocompetent patients (<66 years of age) with PCNSL failing prior HD-MTX based chemotherapy. Induction treatment consisted of 2 courses of rituximab (rituximab 375mg/m2), high-dose cytarabine (2 x 3g/m2) and thiotepa (40mg/m2) with collection of autologous stem cells in between. Conditioning treatment for HCT-ASCT consisted of rituximab 375mg/m2, carmustine 400mg/m2 and thiotepa (4 x 5mg/kg). Patients commenced HCT-ASCT irrespective of response status after induction. Only patients not achieving complete remission (CR) after HCT-ASCT received whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). The primary endpoint was CR after HCT-ASCT by intention-to-treat (ITT). Secondary endpoints included safety, progression free survival (PFS, time to progression or death) and overall survival (OS, time to death due to any cause). Results Between May 2007 and July 2012, we enrolled 39 patients from 12 German centres. The median age and Karnofsky performance score was 57 years (range 37 to 65) and 90% (range 60% to 100%), respectively. 28 (71.8%) patients had relapsed and 8 (28.2%) refractory disease. 22 (56.4%) patients responded to induction (4 CR, 18 partial remissions [PR]) and 32 (82.1%) patients commenced HCT-ASCT. 22 patients (56.4%, 95% CI 39.6% to 72.2%) achieved CR after HCT-ASCT, 6 (15.4%) achieved PR, and 1 (2.6%) had stable disease. In 9 (17.8%) patients the final scan was not done, because 7 (18.0%) did not undergo HCT-ASCT and 2 died (5.1%) during HCT-ASCT procedure. After a median follow-up of 45.2 months, the respective 2-year PFS and OS rates were 46.0% (95% CI 30.3% to 61.7%, median PFS 12.4 months, Figure 1) and 56.4% (95% CI 40.8% to 72.0%); median OS not reached (Figure 2). The non-relapse mortality rate was 10.3% (95% CI 4.1% to 26.0%) at 1 year without any further increase afterwards. In the subset of 32 patients who received HCT-ASCT, 14 (56.3%) experienced progression or died translating into 1 and 2-year PFS rates (calculated from date of HCT-ASCT) of 62.5% (95% CI 45.7% to 79.3%) and 56.1% (95% CI 38.8% to 73.3%) with no further decrease afterwards. Main grade 3 or higher toxicities were hematological as expected. We recorded four (10.3%) treatment-related deaths, 2 during induction and 2 during HCT-ASCT. Conclusions In eligible PCNSL patients failing HD-MTX based chemotherapy, a short induction with high-dose cytarabine and thiotepa followed by HCT-ASCT is an effective treatment option. Our data provide a reliable benchmark for future comparative studies needed to further scrutinize the role of HCT-ASCT in the salvage setting for PCNSL. Figure 1. Progression free survival Figure 1. Progression free survival Figure 2. Overall survival Figure 2. Overall survival Disclosures Kasenda: Riemser: Other: Travel Support. Schmidt-Wolf:Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Röth:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Stilgenbauer:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding. Illerhaus:Riemser: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Outcomes after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Mantle Cell Lymphoma Based on Remission Status and Induction Chemotherapy Regimen.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v110.11.1905.1905 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 110 (11) ◽

pp. 1905-1905

Author(s):

Brian G. Till ◽

Theodore A. Gooley ◽

Nathan Crawford ◽

Ajay K. Gopal ◽

David G. Maloney ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Refractory Disease ◽

Free Survival ◽

Remission Status ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Mantle Cell ◽

Induction Regimen

Abstract Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has one of the worst prognoses of any subtype of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), with a median survival of 3–4 years in most series. High-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is an increasingly common treatment approach for MCL, and some ASCT studies suggest that less heavily pre-treated patients have a longer duration of progression-free survival (PFS), suggesting that ASCT may lead to more favorable outcomes if used earlier in the course of therapy. We analyzed the outcomes of ASCT with respect to remission status at the time of transplantation and induction regimen used in 56 consecutive transplanted patients with MCL. Twenty-one patients received induction chemotherapy with HyperCVAD with or without rituximab (±R) followed by ASCT in first complete or partial remission (CR1/PR1), 15 received CHOP (±R) followed by ASCT in CR1/PR1, and 20 received ASCT following disease progression. A variety of conditioning regimens were used for ASCT in all 3 groups. Estimates of overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 years among patients transplanted in CR1/PR1 were 93% and 63%, compared with 46% and 36% for patients transplanted with relapsed or refractory disease, respectively (Figure 1). The hazard of mortality among patients transplanted with relapsed or refractory disease was 6.09 times that of patients transplanted in CR1/PR1 (P=.006). Patients in the CHOP (±R) group appeared to have a higher risk of failure for PFS compared to patients in the HyperCVAD (±R) group, though the difference did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio [HR] 3.67, P=.11) with the small sample size available. The estimated 3-year PFS was 81% for patients in the HyperCVAD group and 44% for patients in the CHOP group. Patients who received R with induction therapy had a reduced risk of mortality (HR 0.33, P=.05) and failure for PFS (HR 0.28, P=.005) compared to those who did not. In summary, these results suggest that ASCT in first remission leads to improved survival outcomes for patients with MCL compared to ASCT with relapsed or refractory disease, and a HyperCVAD (±R) induction regimen may be associated with an improved PFS among patients transplanted in CR1/PR1. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival from the time of ASCT, with respect to remission status at ASCT. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival from the time of ASCT, with respect to remission status at ASCT.

Download Full-text