scholarly journals Reducing Length of Stay for Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Inpatient High-Dose Cytarabine Consolidation Chemotherapy

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1937-1937
Author(s):  
David O Riley ◽  
Caroline Jones ◽  
Amy L Morris ◽  
Jeremy M Sen ◽  
Nicholas J Schmidt ◽  
...  

Abstract Background For patients receiving high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) at the University of Virginia Health System between 10/2019 and 10/2020, median length of stay (LOS) from time of clinic appointment to hospital discharge exceeded the expected standard treatment time (119.4 hours vs 112 hours). Despite the final dose of chemotherapy being scheduled for completion by 9:00 am on the planned day of discharge, only 50% of patients receiving HiDAC were successfully discharged by 12:00 pm (3 hours post-chemotherapy completion). Though there are no national standards for duration of inpatient stay for planned chemotherapy, LOS that extends beyond the standard treatment time results in increased cost, overutilization of hospital resources, delayed admissions for future patients, and patient dissatisfaction. Methods A multidisciplinary team of licensed providers, pharmacists, and nurses was formed. Due to inconsistency in admission times, the team focused on the percentage of patients discharged by 12:00 pm as a surrogate marker for LOS. The aim was to increase the percentage of patients discharged by 12:00 pm to 65%. Reviewing the baseline data revealed an unstable process with a 3-sigma XmR statistical process control chart. The team developed current and ideal process state maps, a Pareto chart, and a priority matrix to determine an action plan. The most common identified causes for delay in discharge included: lack of standardized discharge checklist, discharge order placed after 10:00 am, medications dispensed from the outpatient pharmacy after 11:00 am, licensed providers not prioritizing patients who were pending discharge, and medication reconciliation not completed prior to day of discharge. Results From 10/2020 to 5/2021, the first PDSA cycle focused on standardizing the discharge process to correct the instability in the process. A discharge checklist was created based on the ideal process map, which allowed providers to have a consistent process at discharge. A 3-sigma XmR chart demonstrated a newly stable process and an increase in percentage of patients discharged by 12:00 pm to 58% (14 of 24). The second PDSA cycle from 6/2021 to 8/2021 addressed the high impact/easy effort interventions identified in the priority matrix: providers completed medication reconciliation the day before discharge, prioritized seeing HiDAC discharge patients first during morning rounds, and ensured discharge orders were placed prior to completion of the last chemotherapy infusion. Following these interventions, the percentage of patients discharged by 12:00 pm increased to 66% (4 of 6). Conclusions Using quality improvement methodology, a multidisciplinary team developed an action plan for patients receiving HiDAC that has increased the percentage of patients discharged by 12:00 pm. This outcome may lead to decreased length of stay, reduced hospitalization costs, and increased bed availability for other hematology/oncology patients. Further PDSA cycles are planned and will focus on the pharmacy medication delivery service, and continuous evaluation of the process is ongoing. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures El Chaer: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 257-257
Author(s):  
Caroline Jones ◽  
David Riley ◽  
Amy Morris ◽  
Jeremy Michael Sen ◽  
Alana Ferrari ◽  
...  

257 Background: For patients receiving high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) at University of Virginia (UVA) Health between 10/2019 and 10/2020, median length of stay (LOS) from time of clinic appointment to hospital discharge was 119.35 hours. Standard treatment time should be 112 hours from premedication to end of chemotherapy. There are no national standards for duration of inpatient stay for planned chemotherapy, but only 50% of these patients were discharged after noon (over 3 hours post-chemotherapy completion). LOS that extends beyond the standard treatment time results in increased cost, overutilization of hospital resources, delayed admissions for future patients, and patient dissatisfaction. Methods: A multidisciplinary team comprised of licensed providers, pharmacists, and nurses was formed. The team focused on percentage of patients discharged by noon as a surrogate marker for LOS due to inconsistency of admission times; the aim was to increase patients discharged by noon to 65%. Reviewing the baseline data revealed an unstable process with a 3-sigma X-bar statistical process control chart. The team developed current and ideal process state maps, a Pareto chart, and a priority matrix to determine an action plan. The most common identified causes for delay in discharge included: lack of standardized discharge checklist, discharge order placed after 10 am, medications dispensed from the outpatient pharmacy after 11 am, licensed providers not prioritizing discharge patients, and medication reconciliation not completed prior to day of discharge. Results: From 10/2020 to 5/2021, the first PDSA cycle focused on standardizing the discharge process to correct the instability in the process. A discharge checklist was created based on the ideal process map, which allowed the providers to have a consistent process at discharge. 3-sigma Xbar chart demonstrated a now stable process and an increase of patients discharged by noon to 58%. During the second PDSA cycle starting in 6/2021, providers completed medication reconciliation the day before discharge, prioritized HiDAC discharges first during rounds, and ensured discharge orders were placed by completion of the last chemotherapy bag. Data collection is ongoing, and will be analyzed by August 2021. Future tests of change are planned to focus on the pharmacy medication delivery service. Hospital LOS has also decreased after the first PDSA cycle. Conclusions: Using quality improvement methodology, a multidisciplinary team developed an action plan for patients receiving HiDAC which to date has increased the percentage of patients discharging by noon and decreased length of stay. This outcome may lead to reduce hospitalization costs and increase bed availability for other oncology patients. Further PDSA cycles are scheduled and continuous evaluation of the process is ongoing.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 219-219
Author(s):  
Joseph Van Galen ◽  
Samuel Maldonado ◽  
Leonid Volodin ◽  
Michael Kenneth Keng

219 Background: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most important affecting patients immunocompromised by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and can be associated with increased morbidity and length of stay. One precipitating factor for index CDI cases in the ASCT population is heavy antibiotic exposure, which often includes prophylaxis. A retrospective review identified 11 cases of CDI (17%) in the 30-day period following ASCT performed at the University of Virginia Medical Center (UVAMC) between about June 2016 and July 2017. Various institutional and multicenter studies have reported incidence rates in this population ranging from less than 5% to more than 10%. Methods: To decrease CDI rate, a multidisciplinary team comprised of oncology and infectious diseases physicians, pharmacists, and nurses was formed. The group used quality improvement principles to identify and target areas of greatest significance. A first PDSA cycle was conducted between approximately July 2017 and June 2018, during which time administration of standard-of-care ciprofloxacin prophylaxis between T+0 and count recovery was suspended. A second PDSA cycle was executed between approximately May 2018 and July 2019, incorporating UV light equipment into existing post-discharge cleaning practices. Data were analyzed using process control charts with 3-sigma limits for ASCT length-of-stay (LOS) and 30-day post-transplant CDI incidence. Results: Suspension of prophylactic antibiotics did not have a significant effect on CDI incidence in our first PDSA cycle. In our second improvement cycle, most of which elapsed after prophylactic ciprofloxacin had been re-implemented, CDI incidence was almost halved, from 17 to 9%. A numerical decreased in LOS was observed in each subsequent PDSA cycle. Conclusions: Our multidisciplinary team applied quality improvement methods to drive a clinically significant reduction in the 30-day CDI incidence after ASCT at UVAMC. This outcome should be associated with an improved patient experience. Future PDSA cycles are scheduled and may include other cancer patients, beyond those receiving stem cell transplantation.[Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S22-S22
Author(s):  
Escobedo-Melendez Griselda ◽  
Martinez-Albarran Manuel ◽  
Magaña-Saldivar Isadora ◽  
Jimenez Norma ◽  
Gomez-Huerta Elizabeth ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In children with cancer infections are the most frequent complication, with fatal outcomes if not addressed promptly. Therefore, care and prevention of infections in these patients require multidisciplinary interventions, with effective communication among healthcare providers to reduce the morbidity, length of stay, and the inappropriate use of resources. We used the Institute of Healthcare Improvement (IHI) model for improving the communication among healthcare providers by using patient daily goals after the oncology pediatric unit multidisciplinary rounds. Methods A multidisciplinary team was identified in the pediatric oncology unit. The team received weekly coaching on the IHI methodology. The methodology used included the creation of a block diagram to understand the baseline processes and a key driver diagram. Then, after a literature review, a data collection plan and measures were identified. The team identified different ideas for changes and prioritized them using an impact-effort matrix. Finally, several rounds of Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles reached the desired changes that organized the patient daily goals for sharing in the form of a worksheet. This worksheet was shared with nurses and pharmacist staff, a chat group was created, and the routine use of the daily goals for patient management was taught and incorporated into the rest of the care team staff. The percentage of excellent communication among all multidisciplinary teams and outcomes (length of stay, intensive care unit admission, and mortality) were recorded at baseline and endline. We determined the statistical significance of the baseline vs. endline difference by using χ 2 and t-tests. Results A total of 105 patients with suspected infections were included over a 6-month period (June through November 2019). We found a significant increase per month in the percent of agreement in excellent communication in the patient daily goals between infectious diseases specialist faculty and fellows, nurses, pharmacist, and pediatric oncology faculty and fellows (33.3% vs. 91.3%) (P = 0.004). Length of stay decreased monthly after our interventions (baseline: mean 14.7 days [SD 12.4] vs. after intervention: mean 6.7 days [SD 2.7]) (P = 0.014). There were only one ICU admission and no deaths during the implementation period. Conclusions Our approach using patient daily goals improved communication among a multidisciplinary team, leading to decreased length of stay and supporting adequate outcomes.


Author(s):  
Divyesh Kumar ◽  
G. Y. Srinivasa ◽  
Ankita Gupta ◽  
Bhavana Rai ◽  
Arun S. Oinam ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Carcinoma cervix is amongst the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in women population worldwide. High-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) post external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is the standard of care in managing locally advanced stage cervical cancer patients. HDR-ICBT is generally performed under general anaesthesia (GA) in operation theatre (OT), but due to logistic reasons, sometimes, it becomes difficult to accommodate all patients under GA. Since prolonged overall treatment time (OTT) makes the results inferior, taking patients in day care setup under procedural sedation (PS) can be an effective alternative. In this audit, we tried to retrospectively analyse the dosimetric difference, if any, in patients who underwent ICBT at our centre, under either GA in OT or PS in day care. Results Thirty five patients were analysed 16/35 (45.71%) patients underwent HDR-ICBT under GA while 19/35 (54.28%) patients under PS. In both groups, a statistically significant difference was observed between the dose received by 0.1 cc as well as 2 cc of rectum (p < 0.05), while the bladder and sigmoid colon had comparable dosages. Conclusion Though our dosimetric analysis highlighted better rectal sparing in patients undergoing HDR-ICBT under GA when compared to patients under PS, PS can still be considered an effective alternative, especially in centres dealing with significant patient load. Further studies are required for firm conclusion.


Author(s):  
S Gonzalez Suarez ◽  
M Martínez Camacho ◽  
E Rodríguez Jímenez ◽  
S Martín Braojos ◽  
A Alfaro Acha ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document