The Pattern of Organ Responses Varies in Patients with Systemic Light-Chain Amyloidosis and Heart or Kidney or Heart and Kidney Involvement Who Achieve Deep Hematologic Responses

Abstract Introduction: In systemic light-chain amyloidosis (AL) aberrant clonal free immunoglobulin light chains (FLC) misfold and deposit in vital organs causing severe dysfunction (Nat Rev Dis Primers 2018;4:38). With anti-plasma cell therapy that reduces or eliminates the involved FLC (iFLC), defined organ responses can occur (N Engl J Med 2021;385:46, Blood Rev 2019;37:100581, Leukemia 2017;31:136, Blood 2014;124:2325). We asked whether the timing of individual organ responses may be influenced by the number of organs involved at diagnosis; therefore we evaluated the pattern of responses in patients with the two most commonly involved organs (heart, kidney) who achieved deep hematologic responses to therapy (CR=complete response, VGPR=very good partial response)(J Clin Oncol 2012;30:4541). We examined whether the rate of and time to organ response varied in patients with only heart or kidney or heart and kidney involvement, and whether the depth of hematologic response impacted the pattern of organ response. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis AL patients diagnosed by tissue biopsy between 2007-2019 who had heart and/or kidney involvement at diagnosis and achieved hematologic CR/VGPR with treatment. Mann-Whitney was used to compare rates of organ responses and log-rank tests were applied to compare times to organ response among the subgroups as well as overall survival (OS) differences based on iFLC responses and on organ responses. Results were considered to be significant if two-sided P-value was less than or equal to 0.05. Results: We identified 111 patients with a median age of 62.5 years (range, 40-80) who met these criteria, 65 of whom (59%) were male. Cardiac involvement only was present in 34 (30.6%), renal involvement only in 31 (28.0%), and both cardiac and renal involvement in 46 (41.4%). Table 1 highlights patient characteristics. The median OS for the entire cohort was 112 months (95% CI 100-NA). The overall cardiac response rate was 62.5%, with a median time to response of 8 months (range, 1-73 months). Overall renal response rate was 67.1% with a median time to response of 10 months (range, 1-57 months). Log-rank analysis showed a significant difference in the OS based on post treatment iFLC levels (<10 vs. 10-20 vs. >20 mg/L) as we have previously described (Am J Hematol 2021;96:E20). Patients with kidney involvement only had significantly improved overall survival (OS) compared to those with cardiac involvement only (p=0.05), as expected. However, there was no difference in the OS of patients with cardiac only vs. cardiac and renal involvement (p=0.58), while there was a trend towards shorter OS in patients with cardiac and renal vs renal (p=0.09). The lower iFLC levels achieved post-treatment influenced cardiac response rate (p=0.07), and significantly impacted renal response rate (p<0.01). For patients with cardiac involvement, iFLC responses did not have a significant impact on time to cardiac response, whereas for patients with renal involvement, faster responses were noted in those achieving lower iFLC levels (p=0.017) (Figure 1). There was no significant difference in time to cardiac response between patients with cardiac only vs. cardiac and renal involvement (p=0.93) whereas patients with renal only vs cardiac and renal involvement had a faster time to renal response (medians 14 (range, 10-29) vs 43 (13-not reached) months, p=0.018) (Figure 2). Conclusion: In AL patients with renal involvement who achieve CR/VGPR with treatment, post-treatment iFLC levels and co-presence of cardiac involvement play significant roles in the timing of renal responses. In AL patients with cardiac involvement who achieve CR/VGPR, post-treatment iFLC levels but not the co-presence of renal involvement influences the rate of cardiac response but neither influences the timing. These differences may be due to organ-specific factors such as proteomic adaptations or relative iFLC toxicity or complex cardio-renal hormonal interactions. Further hypothesis-driven study of these differences is warranted in this era of new and effective anti-plasma cell therapies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Comenzo: Prothena Biosciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Unum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Patents & Royalties: WO2016187546A1, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Hematologic Responses and Cardiac Organ Improvement in Patients with Heavily Pretreated Cardiac Immunoglobulin Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis Receiving Daratumumab

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4525.4525 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4525-4525 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Gregory Kaufman ◽

Ronald Witteles ◽

Matthew Wheeler ◽

Patricia Ulloa ◽

Marie Lugtu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Light Chain ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cardiac Involvement ◽

Cardiac Response ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Immunoglobulin Light Chain ◽

Prior Therapy ◽

Hematologic Response ◽

Heavily Pretreated ◽

Organ Response

Abstract Introduction: In immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis, cardiac involvement is the primary cause of premature death. Light chain suppression, with therapies targeting the underlying plasma cell clone producing amyloidogenic free light chains, has been difficult to achieve in a relapsed/refractory disease setting. Hematologic response is required to obtain a cardiac organ response, which is predictive of survival and is an important, if not primary, therapeutic goal. We have previously reported rapid and favorable hematologic response rates with the monoclonal anti-CD38 antibody daratumumab in a cohort of heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory AL patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate cardiac organ response following light chain suppressive therapy with daratumumab in patients with relapsed/refractory AL. Materials & Methods:Consecutive patients with biopsy-proven AL and cardiac involvement, followed at the Stanford University Amyloid Center, who received daratumumab were retrospectively evaluated for hematologic and cardiac organ response. In accordance with IRB approval, demographic and clinical information was obtained from medical records. Hematologic and cardiac organ response criteria were defined per consensus guidelines in AL (Comenzo et al, Leukemia 2012). Results: Twelve patients with previously treated AL with cardiac involvement received a median of 12 doses (range 5-18) of single agent daratumumab. The antibody was given intravenously at 16 mg/kg weekly for 8 weeks, followed by every other week infusion for 8 doses and then monthly infusions. The median patient age was 67 and 75% of patients were male. The median number of lines of prior therapy was 3; notably, none of the patients had previously achieved a hematologic complete response to prior therapy including high dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplant in 2 patients. Ten of 12 patients (83%) achieved a partial hematologic response or better with daratumumab (3 complete responses (25%), 3 very good partial responses (25%), and 4 partial responses (33%)). Median NT-pro BNP was 2516 pg/mL prior to daratumumab therapy. Of all 12 treated patients, seven patients were evaluable for cardiac response based on baseline NT-proBNP >650 ng/L. Of these, 3 patients achieved a cardiac organ response by NT-pro BNP criteria (>30% reduction and >300 ng/l decrease). Two patients had cardiac progression by NT-pro BNP criteria (no echocardiographic progression was observed) despite hematologic response with one patient discontinuing therapy to pursue hospice care. Infusion reactions were observed in 8/12 patients with only 1 grade 3 infusion reaction. Conclusions: Daratumumab yielded rapid and significant hematologic responses in our retrospective single institution cohort of heavily pretreated AL patients. At a median daratumumab duration of therapy of only 4 months, evidence of cardiac organ improvement was observed. Daratumumab represents a well tolerated and exceptionally promising new treatment for patients with AL amyloidosis; larger prospective trials to evaluate this agent are warranted. Disclosures Liedtke: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Addition of Cyclophosphamide and Higher Doses of Dexamethasone Do Not Improve Outcomes of Patients with AL Amyloidosis Treated with Bortezomib

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4500.4500 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4500-4500

Author(s):

Efstathios Kastritis ◽

Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽

Maria Roussou ◽

Despina Fotiou ◽

Dimitrios Ziogas ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Plasma Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Cell Clone ◽

Cardiac Response ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Renal Response ◽

Higher Doses

Abstract Treatment of AL amyloidosis is based on the elimination of the plasma cell clone that produces the amyloidogenic light chains. Typically, these are indolent clones and plasma cell burden is low, thus, even low dose, low toxicity, regimens may be very effective. Bortezomib is effective in targeting plasma cells. Several series have also shown that bortezomib either as single agent or in combinations, such as bortezomib with dexamethasone (VD) or with the addition of cyclophosphamide (VCD) induce high rates of hematologic CRs and organ responses. Patients with AL are frail due to multisystemic involvement and data from the treatment of frail patients with myeloma, usually elderly ones, have shown that addition of a third agent to VD does not improve outcomes and may increase toxicity. However, VCD is considered as a "standard" regimen for primary therapy of patients with AL, in most centers, but, it is not clear whether the addition of a third drug (cyclophosphamide) to bortezomib/dexamethasone (VD) further and significantly improves efficacy, given the substantial activity of bortezomib itself. Thus, we compared the outcomes of patients with AL amyloidosis who received (VD) or with VD plus a third agent (VCD). The analysis included 101 consecutive patients with biopsy confirmed AL amyloidosis, all diagnosed and treated in the Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Athens, Greece. All patients received similar supportive care and were treated in two consecutive periods (up to 2010 received VD and after 2011 received VCD). Median age was 65 years, 70% had cardiac and 71% renal involvement; Mayo stage was -1, -2 & -3 in 20%, 47% & 33% while renal stage was -1, -2 and -3 in 22%, 56% & 22% of the patients respectively. Treatment was VD in 59 (58%) and VCD in 42 (42%) patients. Compared to patients who received VCD, patients who received VD were older (median age 67 vs 60.5 years, p=0.024), were more often Mayo stage 3 (42% vs 29%, p=0.03), had lower eGFR (median 54 vs 86 ml/min/1.73 m2) but had similar distribution in renal stages. Heart, renal and nerve involvement were similar between those who received VD vs VCD (p>0.5 for all). According to our institutional guidelines for patients with AL amyloidosis schedule of bortezomib (twice per week vs weekly) and dexamethasone are adjusted to cardiac risk and presence of neuropathy. Weekly bortezomib was given in 41% of patients who received VD and vs 40% with VCD and the starting dose was 1.3 mg/m2 in 90% and 92.5% respectively. The median dose of dexamethasone for all patients was 160 mg/month, but for patients treated with VD was 240 mg/month and was 144 mg/month for those treated with VCD (p=0.01). Early mortality (<3 months from start of therapy) was 22% for patients treated with VD and 8% for patients treated with VCD, but after adjustment for Mayo stage there was no difference, and was 36% vs 29% in patients with Mayo stage 3 disease. On intent to treat a hematologic response was achieved by 72% (CR:25%, VGPR:17% , PR: 30%) and was 68% for patients treated with VD and 78% for VCD (p=0.26); after adjustment for Mayo stage there was still no difference in response rates. Regarding CR+VGPR, it was 47.5% with VD and 35% with VCD. Notably higher doses of dexamethasone or twice-weekly bortezomib schedule were not associated with significantly higher hematologic response rates or CR+VGPR rates. Organ responses occurred in 35% of patients (cardiac in 26%, renal in 42%). For VD, cardiac response rate was 29% and renal response rate was 43%, while for VCD cardiac response was 21% and renal response was 41% (p>0.5 for all comparisons). Median follow up is 3 years and median overall survival (OS) is 34 months. Median OS of patients treated with VD vs VCD was similar (33 vs 36 months, p=0.45). After adjustment for the dose and schedule of bortezomib and dexamethasone, and Mayo stage, still there was no difference in the OS between patients treated with VD vs VCD and no prognostic effect of higher doses of dexamethasone and twice weekly bortezomib was found. In conclusion, our data indicate that bortezomib even with low doses of dexamethasone is effective for the treatment of AL amyloidosis; higher doses of dexamethasone and addition of a third agent (cyclophosphamide) does not seem to have a profound effect on efficacy and survival. Our data also indicate the limits of bortezomib-based therapies, and new agents either targeting the plasma cell clone (like monoclonal antiCD38) or targeting the amyloid deposits are needed. Disclosures Kastritis: Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Terpos:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Dimopoulos:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Pattern of Use and Efficacy of Daratumumab-Based Therapy in Patients with AL Amyloidosis: A Single Institution Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139643 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 44-45

Author(s):

Danai Dima ◽

Xiao Hu ◽

Joshua Dower ◽

Raymond L. Comenzo ◽

Cindy Varga

Keyword(s):

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Response Rate ◽

Medical Center ◽

Cardiac Response ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Single Institution ◽

Hematologic Response ◽

Organ Response

Introduction: Light chain Amyloidosis (AL) is a systemic disease caused by abnormal clonal plasma cells which produce excessive light chains that further misfold and deposit into vital organs. Currently, treatment options for AL amyloidosis are relatively limited. Daratumumab (dara), a novel monoclonal antibody that targets CD38 on the surface of plasma cells, has shown remarkable efficacy in AL amyloidosis. Our objective was to explore the pattern of use, safety and efficacy of dara therapy among AL amyloid patients in a real-world setting at a single institution. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with AL amyloidosis diagnosed by tissue biopsy who received dara-based therapy from 11/16/2015 to 3/16/2020 at Tufts Medical Center. The study was approved by the Tufts Medical Center Institutional Review Board. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics and therapy-related data from patients were extracted from the electronic medical records. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time to hematologic response, time to organ response and progression free survival (PFS) after dara initiation. Log-rank tests were applied to compare PFS among subgroups and to explore the impact of involved free light chain (iFLC) levels on organ response. Results were considered to be significant if two-sided P-value was less than or equal to 0.05. R software was used for statistics. Results: Forty AL patients were included in the study with a median age of 66 years, ranging from 35 to 80 years. Among these patients, 22 (55%) were male and 35 (87.5%) were non-Hispanic White. Cardiac involvement was present in 30 subjects (75%) and renal involvement was present in 20 (50%). By cytogenetic stratification, 10 (25%) individuals had translocation (11;14). Table 1 highlights the clinical characteristics of the study population including the combinations of dara with traditional therapies. Dara was well tolerated in the majority of cases with only one instance of discontinuation due to frequent upper respiratory tract infections. The major therapy-related adverse events are highlighted in table 2. The overall hematologic response rate was 87.5%, including 16 complete responses (CR), 15 very good partial responses (VGPR), and 4 partial responses (PR). The estimated median time to hematologic response was 1.5 months (95% confidence interval (1.0, 2.0 months). The overall cardiac response rate after dara treatment was 46.7%, and the estimated median time to cardiac response was 8.25 months (95% CI, 5.5, 13.0 months). Likewise, the overall renal response rate was 25.0% with the estimated median time to renal response being not evaluable (NE) (95% CI, 12.0, NE). There were 31 patients who had hematologic progression through the study period; the median PFS was 12.0 months (95% CI, 8.25, 18.50 months). The median PFS among those who had translocation (11;14) was 24.1 months. Further log-ranks tests showed that there was no significant difference in PFS when subgrouping patients based on line of treatment (1st vs. 2nd/3rd vs. >3rd, P = 0.322) or pattern of therapy (dara monotherapy vs. combination with PI vs. IMiD vs. PI + alkylating agents vs. NEOD001, P = 0.151). Among the subjects who achieved at least a VGPR, iFLC levels (<10 vs. 10-20 vs. >20) did not show significant impact on the rate and time to organ response (cardiac, P = 0.551 or renal, P = 0.260). In the same population, it was also found that line of treatment (1st vs. 2nd/3rd vs. >3rd) was not associated with organ response (cardiac, P=0.950 or renal, P=0.817). Conclusions: Among the AL amyloidosis patients at Tufts Medical Center treated with dara over the last 5 years, the overall hematologic response was high (87.5%) and the median time to response was rapid (1.5 months), consistent with findings from prior trials. Most importantly, dara was well-tolerated. Patients with t(11;14) had a mPFS that was double the rest of the population (24 vs. 12 months) These results are promising for the disseminated use of dara in AL given its good tolerability and rapid onset of action, regardless of line of therapy. This is especially important in a disease where time is a critical factor in organ recovery. Disclosures Comenzo: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Caleum: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Unum: Consultancy; Prothena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Outcomes By Cardiac Stage in Newly Diagnosed AL Amyloidosis: Results from Andromeda

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139754 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 44-45

Author(s):

Monique C. Minnema ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Giampaolo Merlini ◽

Raymond L. Comenzo ◽

Efstathios Kastritis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cardiac Involvement ◽

Cardiac Response ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hazard Ratios ◽

Organ Response

Background: The extent of cardiac involvement has a major impact on clinical outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed light chain (AL) amyloidosis. Here, we present the hematologic responses, major organ deterioration progression-free survival (MOD-PFS) and event-free survival (MOD-EFS), and organ responses by cardiac stage in patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis treated with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (VCd) with or without daratumumab subcutaneous (DARA SC) in the ANDROMEDA trial (NCT03201965). Methods: Key eligibility criteria included newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis with measurable hematologic disease, ≥1 involved organ, cardiac stage I-IIIA (based on the European Modification of the Mayo staging system), eGFR ≥20 mL/min, and absence of symptomatic multiple myeloma. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive DARA-VCd or VCd alone. All patients received bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 SC weekly), cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2 oral [PO] or intravenous [IV] weekly [500 mg maximum]), and dexamethasone (20-40 mg PO or IV weekly) for six 28-day cycles. DARA SC (1800 mg, co-formulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 in 15 mL) was administered by injection weekly in Cycles 1-2, every 2 weeks in Cycles 3-6, and every 4 weeks thereafter for up to 24 cycles. Disease evaluations occurred every 4 weeks (Cycles 1-6) and every 8 weeks (after Cycle 7) until major organ deterioration, hematologic progression, death, end of study, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was overall (ie, at any time) hematologic complete response (CR) rate. Secondary endpoints included MOD-PFS, MOD-EFS, organ response rate, time to hematologic response, survival, and safety. Analyses of hematologic CR and MOD-PFS were performed on the intent-to-treat analysis set; cardiac response analyses were based on patients who were evaluable for cardiac response, defined as patients with baseline NT-ProNBP value ≥650 ng/L or baseline NYHA class 3 or 4 and received at least 1 administration of study treatment. Patients without a baseline assessment or post-baseline assessment were censored at randomization for the MOD-PFS analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize overall CR rate and organ response rate. Hazard ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were estimated based on Cox proportional hazard model. Results: A total of 388 patients were randomized to receive DARA-VCd (n=195) or VCd alone (n=193). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between treatment groups. The median age was 64 years and the proportions of patients with cardiac stage I, II, and III were 23%, 40%, and 37%, respectively. The median duration of treatment was 9.6 months for DARA-VCd and 5.3 months for VCd. Median follow-up was 11.4 months (range, 0.03-21.3+). Baseline characteristics were generally balanced across cardiac stages, except increasing cardiac stage was associated with older age (≥65 years), worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, more advanced renal failure (CrCl ≤30), and functionally worse heart failure (NYHA IIIA). Hematologic CR rates were higher in the DARA-VCd group than in the VCd group in patients with cardiac stages I, II, and III at baseline (Table). Cardiac and renal response rates at 6 months were also higher in the DARA-VCd group regardless of cardiac stage at baseline (Table). The hazard ratios (HRs) for MOD-PFS were 0.33, 0.55 and 0.66 for cardiac stages I, II and III, respectively, favoring DARA-VCd. Corresponding HRs for MOD-EFS were 0.24, 0.39, and 0.48, respectively. Rates of any grade adverse events (AEs) were similar in patients with and without cardiac involvement at baseline. Across both treatment arms, rates of serious treatment-emergent AEs were higher in patients with cardiac involvement at baseline than in those without. Conclusions: The benefit of DARA-VCd was retained over VCd alone across cardiac stages for hematologic CR, MOD-PFS, MOD-EFS, and organ responses. Disclosures Minnema: Kite, a Gilead Company: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Other: travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy. Dispenzieri:Alnylam: Research Funding; Intellia: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Comenzo:Unum: Consultancy; Prothena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Caleum: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kastritis:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Wechalekar:Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory; Caelum: Other: Advisory. Witteles:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maurer:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alnylam: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ionis: Research Funding; Eidos: Research Funding; Akcea: Research Funding. Tran:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Qin:Janssen: Current Employment. Vasey:Janssen Research & Development: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Tromp:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Weiss:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Vermeulen:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Jaccard:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: A.J. has served in a consulting or advisory role for Janssen and has received honoraria from, received research funding from, and had travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid for or reimbursed by Janssen., Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: A.J. has served in a consulting or advisory role for Janssen and has received honoraria from, received research funding from, and had travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid for or reimbursed by Celgene., Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A European Collaborative Study of Treatment Outcomes In 428 Patients with Systemic AL Amyloidosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.988.988 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 988-988 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Ashutosh D Wechalekar ◽

Efstathios Kastritis ◽

Giampaolo Merlini ◽

Philip N Hawkins ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Amyloidosis ◽

Cardiac Involvement ◽

Median Number ◽

Cardiac Response ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Line Treatment ◽

End Of Treatment ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Organ Response

Abstract Abstract 988 The treatment of patients with systemic AL amyloidosis remains challenging. Cyclical combination chemotherapy is used in majority of patients but a report that I.V. melphalan-dexamethasone may not overcome the poor prognosis for cardiac amyloidosis (Deitrich S et al, Blood, 116, 2010) has fuelled the controversy about best front line treatment. We report outcomes of 428 patients treated with oral cyclophosphamide thalidomide dexamethasone (CTD), oral melphalan dexamethasone (M-dex), bortezomib dexamethasone with or without an alkylator (BD), cyclophosphamide-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (CLD) or stem cell transplant (ASCT) as first line treatment for systemic AL amyloidosis assessed at three large European amyloid centres in London (UK), Pavia (Italy) and Athens (Greece) between 2003–2010. Patients with a full baseline data set were included in the study. Clonal and organ responses were defined according to the international amyloidosis consensus statement (Gertz et al 2005) and responses were assessed at 6 months or at the end of treatment. dFLC (difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC)) was used to assess the absolute FLC change after treatment. 204 (48%) received M-dex, 155 (36%) received CTD, 13 (3%) received ASCT, 28 (7%) received BD and 25 (6%) received CLD. The median number of cycles received was 5 for all regimens. 257 (60%) had cardiac involvement, 325 (76%) had renal and 59 (14%) had liver involvement. Cardiac involvement by regime was: BD 75%, CLD 68%, M-dex 65%, CTD 45% and ASCT 23%. 30 (7%) died within six months of diagnosis. The median number of organ involved was 2 (range 1–5) with ECOG performance status ≥2 in 123 (28%). 98 (23%) patients achieved a complete response (CR), 175 (41%) achieved a partial response (PR) and 125 (29%) did not respond to treatment. A haematological CR/PR was seen, respectively, in 22%/41% treated with CTD, 26%/44% with M-dex, 23%/46% with ASCT, 39%/42% with BD and 4%/44% with CLD. There was significantly greater reduction in dFLC after BD (median reduction 91% over starting value) compared to CTD (median 81%; p = 0.006), M-Dex (median 83%; p = 0.004) and CLD (median 72%; p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in the median dFLC reduction between patients treated with CTD and M-Dex. 100/325 (30%) had a renal organ response, 17/59 (29%) had a hepatic response and 24/257 (9%) had a cardiac response, and 61 (16%) had a cardiac response by NT-proBNP criteria. The organ and NT-proBNP responses respectively were highest in the cohort treated with BD (53% and 32%) followed by CTD (38% and 12%), ASCT (30%), M-dex (23% and 19%) and CLD (12% and nil). CTD achieved significantly better organ responses compared to M-dex (p=0.0024). At median follow up of 29 months, median overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort has not been reached with 2, 3 and 4 year estimated survival of 75%, 65% and 61%, respectively. When patients with cardiac involvement were considered, those achieving a CR have not reached median OS with an estimated 3 year survival of 89%, those with PR had an estimated median OS of 50 months and the non-responders had a median OS of 21 months. Detailed comparison by Mayo stage will be presented. There was no significant difference in the OS of patients treated with CTD or M-Dex (as compared directly or by centre). In summary, outcome of patients with AL amyloidosis across three major European centres appears comparable. BD treatment achieves significantly lower end of treatment dFLC values compared to CTD, M-dex, ASCT or CLD – which importantly translates into an organ response in over half of all patients receiving BD compared to a third of those treated with CTD and quarter of those with M-dex and further follow up may yet reveal survival differences. Organ responses appear significantly better with CTD compared to M-dex – possibly due to more rapid response to CTD since the end of treatment dFLC values are not significantly different - although this does not translate into a survival advantage. Depth of clonal response appears to be directly linked to improvement in survival of patients with cardiac amyloidosis (including in patients treated with CTD and M-dex) and organ response in general. This study supports the rational for doing urgent phase III studies confirming benefits of bortezomib combination chemotherapy for upfront treatment in AL amyloidosis and the benefit of rapid deep clonal responses in cardiac amyloidosis irrespective of the regimen. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Thalidomide, bortezomib, lenalidomide. Dimopoulos:Celgene: Honoraria; Othro Boitech: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Baseline Hypoalbuminemia Does Not Appear to be an Adverse Prognostic Factor in Patients with Relapse/Refractory B-Cell Lymphomas Treated with Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (axi-cel)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126594 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5343-5343

Author(s):

Megan Melody ◽

Sangeetha Gandhi ◽

Zaid Abdel Rahman ◽

Paula A Lengerke Diaz ◽

Nicole Gannon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Serum Albumin ◽

B Cell ◽

Mayo Clinic ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Normal Serum ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Genetics Research ◽

Significant Difference

BACKGROUND: Axi-cel is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy that is approved for treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma and is associated with high response rates and durable remissions. Recent data show that axi-cel is effective across various adverse prognostic features, namely cell of origin, disease bulkiness, and extranodal disease, among others. Hypoalbuminemia is a known adverse prognostic factor in lymphomas. It is unknown if axi-cel overcomes the adverse prognostic feature of hypoalbuminemia in R/R large B-cell or transformed follicular lymphoma. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients treated with axi-cel across three Mayo Clinic campuses (Rochester, Jacksonville, and Phoenix) from 06/01/2018 until 04/01/2019. The primary objective of this analysis was to assess the impact of hypoalbuminemia (defined at day 0, prior to infusion) on outcome after axi-cel therapy. RESULTS: A total of 50 (male=37, 74%) patients (pts), median age of 53 (26-67) years received axi-cel. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (2-8) (Table 1). Two pts had no available serum albumin levels at time of axi-cel infusion. Seven (15%) of 48 pts had serum albumin levels lower than 3.5 g/dL (median= 3.3 g/dL (range 2.6-3.4)) and the median follow up of survivors was 7.6 (1.9-14.3) months. The best overall response rate (ORR) and complete remission (CR) rates in these pts were 57% and 57%, respectively. One (14%) patient had stable disease and 2 (29%) had disease progression. The median overall survival (OS) for pts with hypoalbuminemia was not reached. On the other hand, 41 (85%) pts had a normal serum albumin level (median=4.0 (range 3.5-5.1) g/dL) and the median follow up for survivors was 6.3 months. The best objective response rate (ORR) and complete remission (CR) rates in these pts were 82% and 44%, respectively. The median OS for pts with normal serum albumin was 14 (95%CI=6.3-29.6) months. There was no significant difference at 6-months and 1-year OS between pts with hypoalbuminemia vs. those with normal baseline serum albumin levels [6-month=100% vs. 79%(95%CI=64-93%); 1-year (100% vs. 54% (95%CI=26-82%), p=0.17] (Figure 1). All grades cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was diagnosed in all 7 pts with hypoalbuminemia (100%) and in 38 of 41 (92%) pts without hypoalbuminemia. There was no difference in the median duration of CRS between pts with or without hypoalbuminemia [6 (range 1-11) days vs 5 (range 1-19) days, p=0.89]. Neurotoxicity (all grades) was observed in 5 (71%) pts with hypoalbuminemia compared 26 (63%) with normal albumin levels. There was no statistically significant difference in median duration of neurotoxicity between pts with hypoalbuminemia and those with normal baseline albumin levels [9 (range 1-10) days vs. 3 (range 0-25) days, p= 0.72]. CONCLUSIONS: Hypoalbuminemia does not have a significant impact on the outcomes of axi-cel therapy, including the incidence of CRS or neurotoxicity. These results need to be validated in a large collaborative multicenter study. Further investigation is needed to assess the prognostic impact of severe hypoalbuminemia (<3g/dL) on axi-cel therapy. Disclosures Ansell: Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Affimed: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Trillium: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding. Bennani:Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board. Paludo:Verily Life Sciences: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Verily Life Sciences: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Tun:DTRM Biopharma: Research Funding; Mundi-pharma: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Foran:Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kharfan-Dabaja:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Outcomes and Organ Responses with Daratumumab Therapy in Previously Treated Patients with AL Amyloidosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122152 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1828-1828

Author(s):

Alfred Chung ◽

Gregory P. Kaufman ◽

Surbhi Sidana ◽

Erik Eckhert ◽

Stanley Schrier ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cardiac Response ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Renal Response ◽

Cardiac Responses ◽

Previously Treated

Introduction: AL amyloidosis involves deposition of abnormally folded light chains into a wide range of tissues causing end-organ dysfunction, including in the heart and kidney. Daratumumab, a CD38-targeted antibody, has recently demonstrated efficacy in producing hematologic responses in previously relapsed/refractory disease. However, data on long-term outcomes to daratumumab, including organ responses, are lacking. Here we present the largest retrospective study to date on patients with previously treated AL amyloidosis treated with daratumumab. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis patients treated at Stanford University from January 2016 to January 2019. Patients treated with daratumumab, either as monotherapy with dexamethasone (DMT) or in combination with other plasma-cell directed therapies (DCT) were included. Hematologic and organ responses were assessed by consensus guidelines. Hematologic responses were based on the maximal change in the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains (dFLC). For cardiac response, a >30% and >300 pg/mL decrease in NT-proBNP for patients with initial baseline NT-proBNP ≥650 pg/mL was considered a response. A graded cardiac response metric was also explored with partial response (PR) representing 30-59% reduction, very good partial response (VGPR) ≥60% reduction, and complete response (CR) NT-proBNP <450 pg/mL as previously reported. For renal response, a >30% decrease (by at least 0.5 g/day) in 24-hour urine protein without worsening in creatinine or creatinine clearance by more than 25% in patients with at least 0.5 g/day pretreatment was considered a response. A graded renal response metric was also explored with PR representing 30-59% reduction in proteinuria, VGPR ≥60%, and CR ≤ 200 mg per 24-hour period. Survival data was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. All time-to-event outcomes, including survival and organ responses, were determined from initiation of daratumumab. Results: Eighty-four patients were identified with baseline characteristics at start of daratumumab shown in Table 1. Median duration of follow-up was 16 months. Two-year overall survival (OS) was 83% and median OS was not reached. Median time-to-next-treatment or death was 31 months. Sixty-seven out of 80 evaluable patients (84%) achieved a hematologic response, with 47 patients (59%) achieving a VGPR or better (Figure 1). Sixty-eight patients (81%) had cardiac involvement, and among the 34 evaluable patients, 18 (53%) of evaluable patients achieved a cardiac response with a median response time of 2 months among responders. In terms of a graded cardiac response, 6 patients (18%) were able to achieve cardiac CR, 5 patients (15%) cardiac VGPR, and 7 patients (21%) PR (Figure 2). The median NT-proBNP percent reduction was 64.5% (IQR: 48.3 - 81.1%) and the median absolute reduction was 2395 pg/mL (IQR 1279.5 - 4089.5 pg/mL). Cardiac responses were associated with an improvement in OS (p<0.001, Figure 3), with landmark analysis for cardiac responses at 6-month trending towards statistical significance (100% vs. 51% at 30 months, p=0.052). Fifty-three patients (63%) had renal involvement, and among the 26 evaluable patients, 12 patients (46%) achieved a renal response with a median initial response time of 6 months among responders. Using graded response, 1 patient (4%) achieved renal CR, 7 patients (27%) renal VGPR, 4 patients (15%) renal PR, and 14 patients had no response, worsening creatinine, or were subsequently started on hemodialysis (54%) (Figure 4). The median percent reduction in proteinuria was 74.1% (IQR: 49.2 - 83.1%) and the median absolute reduction in proteinuria was 3.1 g/24 hours (IQR 2.1 - 4.9 g) among responders. There were no significant differences in OS between renal responders and non-responders. Conclusion: Daratumumab is highly effective in the treatment of previously treated AL amyloidosis, and a significant proportion of patients can achieve durable hematologic responses as well as improvements in organ function. Disclosures Kaufman: Janssen: Other: travel/lodging, Research Funding. Liedtke:Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; IQVIA/Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BlueBirdBio: Research Funding; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Daratumumab in AL amyloidosis

Download Full-text

Response to Bortezomib Based Induction Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1867.1867 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1867-1867 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Veerpal Singh ◽

Ayman Saad ◽

Jeanne Palmer ◽

Jasleen K Randhawa ◽

Parameswaran N. Hari

Keyword(s):

Light Chain ◽

Liver Dysfunction ◽

Cardiac Involvement ◽

Response Rate ◽

Initial Therapy ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Karnofsky Performance Score ◽

Significant Activity ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Organ Response

Abstract Abstract 1867 Poster Board I-892 Bortezomib has been shown to have significant activity in the suppression of light chain production and induction of responses in patients with relapsed refractory AL Amyloidosis. We analyzed the outcomes of 16 (9 male) newly diagnosed biopsy proven AL Amyloidosis patients treated with Bortezomib based regimens at our institution. All patients received initial therapy with Bortezomib and dexamethasone (dex). Patients with a Karnofsky performance score ( KPS) >70 received Bortezomib at starting doses of 1.3 mg/m2 along with dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1,4,8, 11 ( with a 10 day rest period). Patients with a lower KPS received Bortezomib/Dex on a weekly schedule as tolerated. Dose adjustments were made based on side effects such as neuropathy, hypotension, GI disturbances or electrolyte imbalances. Patients tolerating Bortezomib/dex with improvement in KPS had cyclophosphamide (4) or lenalidomide (1) added to their initial therapy. Patients: Median age was 64 years (39–88). Nine had kappa light chain involvement. Organ involvement was renal (73%), cardiac (63%), hepatic (25%), tongue or soft tissue (20%), GI (30%). Median KPS was 70 (50 –100). Ten of the 16 patients were treated as in-patients due to multi-organ dysfunction. Five patients required hemodialysis within a month of diagnosis. Cardiac involvement was stage 3 (Mayo risk group) in 25%. Three patients were unevaluable: 2 dying before 2 cycles and 1 discontinued therapy (Grade 3 liver dysfunction). Median follow up was 5 months (range 2–33 mo). Results: Evaluable (receiving at least 2 cycles) patients have all had a free light chain response. The overall hematological response rate was 100% with 55% partial remission (PR) and 45% complete remission (CR). Median cycles to achievement of a light chain response was 2 (range 1–4). Four patients underwent autologous stem cell transplantation with no mortality. Five (40%) of the responders have had an organ response (3 renal, 1 macroglossia, 1 cardiac) with only patients alive for >5 months having any evidence of organ response. Five (40%) of the evaluable patients have died with progressive cardiac involvement (2), relapsed disease (2) or renal failure (1) with refusal of dialysis. In patients receiving at least one dose of bortezomib, non-hematologic toxicity (>grade 2) included -neuropathy (20%), hypotension (20%), severe diarrhea (12%), sepsis (12%), paralytic ileus (6%), liver dysfunction (6%), sudden death (6%). Conclusions: Bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone has a high response rate in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis. This regimen was well tolerated in a cohort of severe, multisystem amyloidosis patients with low treatment related mortality. Light chain responses were fast whereas organ responses were not seen prior to 5 months of therapy. The regimen also served as a platform for further intensification with the addition of lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide or autologous transplant in responders. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Bortezomib for the therapy of amyloidosis. Hari:Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Difference of Treatment Outcomes in AL Amyloidosis and Multiple Myeloma with / without Translocation (11;14)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.4224.4224 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 4224-4224 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Kenshi Suzuki ◽

Miho Kasuga ◽

Kanji Miyazaki ◽

Sohsuke Meshitsuka ◽

Yu ABE ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Chromosome Aberration ◽

The Other ◽

Cardiac Response ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Positive Group ◽

Other Hand ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Organ Response

Abstract Introduction AL amyloidosis (AL) is characterized by the deposition of immunoglobulin light chains as amyloid fibrils accumulated in different organs. Translocation (11;14) (t(11;14)) is seen in about half of AL patients, but the clinical significance is still unknown. So our study has focused on the chromosome aberration of t(11;14). We report the relationship between the chromosome aberration and the organ response, the organ involvement which greatly influence prognosis of AL patients. Furthermore, we examined the prognosis and treatment response to compare t(11;14) influences of AL with t(11;14) influences of multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and Methods We analyzed in AL and symptomatic MM patients have t(11;14) using fluorescence in situ hybridization from January 2010 to December 2014 in Japanese Red Cross Medical Center. We examined the overall survival and the therapy response rate. In addition, we compared t(11;14)-positive and negative in AL and MM respectively. Besides, we investigated the involved organ parts and the organ response with melphalan and dexamethasone (MD) therapy in AL. Outcome was assessed based on remission after three months and one year. Remissions were determined according to consensus criteria in 2011 for AL and IMWG uniform criteria for MM. Survival distribution of OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Data between t(11;14)-positive and negative were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test or X2 test. The statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS statistics ver.23. Results Among 27 patients with AL, 9 cases were t(11;14)-positive patients (age median, 64yr; range, 37-80), and 13 out of 46 were positive in MM (age median, 64yr; range, 34-86). (excluded complication of both AL and MM cases) In AL cases, the t(11;14)-positive group tended to shorter overall survival (OS) than negative cases. On the other hand, in the patients with MM, positive group tended to superior OS to negative (AL: P=0.442(Fig.1A), MM: P=0.327(Fig.1B)). Compared with t(11;14)-negative AL group, t(11;14) positive group was tended to have much organ involved numbers of amyloid protein (67% v 34%; P=0.109) and much cardiac involvement patients (67% v 39%; P=0.171). On the other hand, there were little cardiac and renal response in both t(11;14)-positive and negative with MD therapy after 3 months (heartF17% v 0% P=0.462/renalF0% v 0%). In MM patients, ORR after 3 months were 67% and 79% in t(11;14)-positive and negative cases respectively (P=0.386). That after 1 year were 78% and 74% respectively (P=0.889). Conclusion t(11;14) is important prognostic factor and showed conflict prognosis between AL and MM. From this investigation, the importance of connecting the chromosome abnormality every disease was shown. In addition, our investigation recognized tendencies that the amyloid involvement rate to the heart was high, and the cardiac response with MD therapy were low in AL t(11;14)-positive group. As these results, we thought that t(11;14)-positive AL patients' OS were shortened. The significant difference did not appear in this examination while these tendencies were clearly accepted in little number of patient cases. Further investigation using rather number of patient samples is needed. In conclusion, the cardiac amyloid involvement is high in the AL t(11;14)-positive group, and the cardiac response by MD therapy is low. We should have doubt eyes of the amyloid involvement to the heart in AL t(11;14)-positive patients, and have the posture that can support cardiac amyloidosis immediately. In addition, breakthrough new treatments are expected urgently for AL patients. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Impact of Cardiac Stage and Hematologic Response on AL Amyloidosis Patients with Renal Involvement

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2136.2136 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2136-2136

Author(s):

Sandy W. Wong ◽

Denis Toskic ◽

Melissa Warner ◽

Alejandro Moreno-koehler ◽

Daniel Fein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cardiac Involvement ◽

Renal Involvement ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Intention To Treat ◽

Hematologic Response ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Stage 1

Abstract Cardiac stage and depth of hematologic remission are major predictors of survival for AL amyloidosis patients (Wechalekar et al., Blood, 2013; Dispenzieri et al., JCO, 2004; Palladini et al., JCO, 2012). Renal staging in AL amyloidosis (AL) has been studied in the context of renal survival (Palladini et al., Blood 2014). Influences on survival for renal patients have yet to be fully defined. We performed a retrospective study of all AL patients with renal involvement diagnosed at our center between 7/1/08 and 6/30/15. In this cohort of consecutive patients (n=80) median age was 63 (IQR 55-70) and 56% were men. Eighty-eight percent had lambda plasma cell disease and median involved FLC was 140mg/L (69-485). Thirty-nine percent were renal stage 1, 44% stage 2, and 16% stage 3. Median 24-hour proteinuria and serum creatinine were 6.23 g (3.47-10.70) and 1.03 mg/dL (0.80-1.80) respectively, and median eGFR was 72 mL/min (41-90). Fifty-eight percent had cardiac involvement, of whom 11% were cardiac stage 1, 54% stage 2, and 34% stage 3, while 18% had GI and 9% peripheral nerve involvement. As first-line therapy, 70% received bortezomib-based regimens and 25% melphalan-based autologous stem cell transplant. By intention-to-treat, at 6 months after beginning therapy, 54% of patients had a hematologic response of PR or better, and renal and cardiac responses occurred in 13% and 14% of patients respectively, while renal progression occurred in 6%. Median overall survival (OS) for this cohort (n=80) was 67 months. Those with cardiac involvement (n=45) had a median OS of 41 months and, while median OS was not reached for cardiac stage ≤ 2, it was 31 months for those who were stage 3 (P<0.05) (Figure). Median OS was also not reached for patients achieving hematologic response ≥ VGPR with a median follow-up of 19 months. In conclusion, for AL patients with renal involvement, both cardiac stage and depth of hematologic response are important contributors to overall survival. Furthermore, as this real world intention-to-treat analysis demonstrates, there is a continuing need for better therapies for both the hematologic disease and the organ damage associated with AL. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Oliver: Prothena Biosciences, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Guthrie:Prothena: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Leadership. Comenzo:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text