scholarly journals A Phase I Open Label Dose Escalation Study of MB-CART19.1 in Relapsed and Refractory CD19+ B Cell Malignancies, Interim Preliminary Results in Pediatric ALL, Adult ALL Including CLL Cohorts

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3836-3836
Author(s):  
Andreas Mackensen ◽  
Linda Hanssens ◽  
Matthias Stelljes ◽  
Wolfgang A Bethge ◽  
Tobias Feuchtinger ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction This phase I first-in-human clinical study assesses the safety and preliminary efficacy of a CD19-directed, CAR (4-1BBz) gene-modified, autologous T-cell immunotherapy (MB-CART19.1) intended for use in pediatric and adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The study also evaluates the feasibility of a hybrid manufacturing model, combining central and academic manufacturing capabilities with central QP oversight. Methods MB-CART19.1 is evaluated in a Phase I (EudraCT 2017-002848-32) multi-center, open label, dose escalation trial enrolling 33 to 48 patients in three disease cohorts, defined by disease biology and age. Pediatric (1-17 years) and adult patients are eligible if diagnosed with relapsed/refractory (r/r) CD19-expressing B-cell ALL or B-cell high-grade and low-grade (adults) NHL, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Enrollment is still ongoing. The starting material, a fresh patient leukapheresis product, is enriched for CD4/CD8 T-cells, transduced with a lentiviral vector (LV) and expanded using the CliniMACS Prodigy System allowing a high degree of control and consistency of the manufacturing process in both a central and decentralized facilities. MB-CART19.1 is presented as fresh cellular dispersion for single infusion and undergoes central release. Subjects undergo lymphodepletion with fludarabine (25 mg/m 2 daily for 3 days) and cyclophosphamide (1000 mg/m 2 on day -3). Dose escalation includes 3 dose levels (DL) 5x10 5 (DL I), 1x10 6 (DL II), 3x10 6 (DL III) CAR T cells/kg BW, respectively, and a safety dose level 0. The primary objective is to determine the recommended dose of MB-CART19.1. Secondary objectives are preliminary efficacy parameters evaluation of as well as CART persistence. Results Disease cohort I: pediatric ALL and aggressive NHL, 1-17 years. Up to the data lock point for interim analysis (DLP, 02 June 2021), 9 pediatric ALL patients were treated, 6 at DL I and 3 at DL II. All 9 patients completed the 28 days safety follow-up. At DL I, 5 of 6 patients experienced CRS (4 grade I-II, 1 grade III,) starting 5 to 7 days after IMP infusion. Two CRS cases were managed with tocilizumab and resolved within 1-2 weeks. 1 patient developed signs of neurotoxicity (grade IV seizure) concurrently with grade II CRS, which was effectively managed and fully resolved within 48 hours. The event was evaluated as DLT and led to the extension of the dose group from 3 to 6 patients. No further neurotoxicities occurred. Four of 6 patients treated at DL I finished the active part of the trial (12 months after administration of IMP) in CR-MRD and entered the long term follow-up. Two patients had CD19-negative relapses 4 and 10 months post MB-CART19.1 infusion. At DL II, 1 patient completed the 6 months follow up in ongoing CR, and 2 patients relapsed. Disease cohort II adult ALL: Up to the DLP, 4 adult ALL patients were treated at DL I. 1 patient died due to progression of disease on day 20 after the IMP infusion. All 4 adult patients experienced a grade I or II CRS all cases were reversible within 1-2 weeks , 1 patient received tocilizumab One patient developed neurologic symptoms (grade III visual impairment and grade III muscle weakness right-sided) with onset 41 and 72 days after administration of MB-CART19.1, respectively. 2 of the 3 patients who completed the safety follow-up finished the active part of the trial and entered the long-term follow-up, both in molecular CR up to Month 6. Disease cohort III adult NHL/CLL: 4 patients were enrolled with the starting dose of 1x10 6 CAR+ cells/kg (DL II). 1 patient experienced grade III CRS and was treated with tocilizumab. 3 patients completed the 28 days safety follow up. One patient with CLL achieved a CR, which is maintained at 6 months. Another CLL patient was in PR at the assessment visit Day 28. Data from the 2 other patients, 1 with MCL and 1 with DLBCL were in PR at month 3. Later data is not yet available. Conclusions 18 of 19 patients completed the follow-up safety period of 28 days defined as observation period for dose limiting toxicity (DLT). One DLT was observed as well as 3 grade III CRS events and 1 grade III neurological event. Early efficacy results are very encouraging. Longer follow-up will establish whether treatment results in durable responses. The hybrid manufacturing model provides flexibility and a timely delivery of the fresh drug product to the patients Disclosures Hanssens: Miltenyi Biomedicine GmbH: Current Employment. Stelljes: MSD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bethge: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi Biotec: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Yakushina: Miltenyi Biomedicine GmbH: Current Employment. Holtkamp: Miltenyi Biomedicine GmbH: Current Employment. Assenmacher: Miltenyi Biotec: Current Employment. Jurk: Miltenyi Biotec: Current Employment. Rauser: Miltenyi Biomedicine GmbH: Current Employment. Schneider: Employee of Lentigen Technology, a Miltenyi Biotec Company: Current Employment. Rossig: AdBoards by Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS and Celgene: Honoraria.

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 304-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Lentzsch ◽  
Amy O'Sullivan ◽  
Ryan Kennedy ◽  
Mohammad Abbas ◽  
Navkiranjit Gill ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 304 Background: Bendamustine is a bifunctional alkylating agent that is approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. This first multicenter, phase I/II trial investigated the combination of bendamustine, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (BLD) as a potentially effective treatment option for multiple myeloma (MM) patients, particularly for those with pre-existing or bortezomib-induced neuropathy. Our primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of bendamustine and lenalidomide when administered with dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Methods: We conducted an open-label, dose escalation study (Table 1). Patients were enrolled from June 2008 through February 2011. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years with confirmed, measurable stage II or III MM that was refractory to or progressed after 1 or more prior therapies including lenalidomide. Patients were assigned to their dose levels in a classical 3+3 cohort design. Phase I was to assess the safety and to establish the MTD of the combination treatment. The phase II portion of the study was to assess the overall response rate (ORR) at the MTD. Intravenous bendamustine was given on days 1 and 2, oral lenalidomide on days 1–21, and oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of the 28-day cycle. Treatment was given until plateau of best response as determined by the International Myeloma Working Group uniform response criteria for a maximum of 8 cycles. The study doses were escalated through 3 levels, in a 3+3 dose escalation scheme. The MTD was defined as the dose level at which ≤1 of 6 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first cycle of therapy when the next higher dose level was associated with DLTs in ≥ 2 patients. Primary endpoint was the MTD. After determining the MTD, up to 12 additional patients were enrolled in an MTD expansion arm to better evaluate toxicity and clinical activity. Secondary endpoints included preliminary efficacy, as evidenced by objective response, time to disease progression, and overall survival. Results: 36 patients with a median age of 63 years (range 38 to 80) were enrolled. The median number of prior therapies was 3 with a range of from 2–9; 79% of the patients had prior lenalidomide, 48% had prior thalidomide, and 34% had both. 69% of the patients had a prior autologous stem cell transplant. The MTD was 75 mg/m2 for bendamustine and 10 mg for lenalidomide. DLTs included at dose level 2: 1 grade 4 neutropenia; at dose level 3: 2 grade 4 neutropenias and 1 delayed platelet recovery from grade 3 thrombocytopenia. 25 received at least 2 cycles and were included into the response assessment. A partial response or better was observed in 52% (n=13) of the patients, including 24% (n=6) VGPR. MR was observed in 24% (n=6), SD 16% (n=4), and PD 8% (n=2). BLD induced fast responses with a time to best response of 1.6 months (range 0.7–7.4). The response was independent of prior exposure to lenalidomide evidenced by the fact that 84% of patients with VGPR/PR had prior treatment with lenalidomide. The median follow up for patients at risk of progression is 8 months (range 4–13). The estimated median progression free survival (PFS) is 4.4 months (95% CI (3.4, 9.2). 4 patients have died and the median follow up for patients who are still alive is 13 months (range 6–33). The median OS survival has not been reached yet. We did not observe any unanticipated DLTs. The only grade 4 adverse events for all patients for all cycles included 24.1% neutropenia and 7% thrombocytopenia. No infection was associated with the neutropenia and all AE resolved successfully. Conclusions: This is the first phase I/II trial testing bendamustine, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in combination for relapsed and refractory MM. This regimen is safe and well tolerated even in older patients up to 80 years. Based on the mainly myelosuppressive side effects, concomitant treatment with filgastrim is recommended. This regimen induced fast responses and high response rates even in heavily pretreated MM patients. The high responses were also achieved in patients with prior exposure to lenalidomide suggesting that BLD overcomes resistance to lenalidomide and is a highly active regimen. Disclosures: Lentzsch: Celgene Corp: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy; prIME Oncology: Honoraria; Imedex: Honoraria; Clinical Care Options: Honoraria. Burt:Celgene Corp: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Cephalon: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Roodman:Amgen: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Agha:Novartis: Consultancy. Zonder:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Medtronics: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. v175
Author(s):  
W. Harb ◽  
A. Patnaik ◽  
D. Mahalingam ◽  
J. Liu ◽  
P.Y. Wen ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank A Giordano ◽  
Stefanie Brehmer ◽  
Bettina Mürle ◽  
Grit Welzel ◽  
Elena Sperk ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document