Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Transplantation in First Remission for Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide: Outcomes By Receipt of Pre-Transplant Blinatumomab

Abstract Background: The benefit of allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT) following myeloablative conditioning (MAC) in first complete remission (CR1) compared to chemotherapy has been demonstrated in a randomized trial for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Persistence of measurable residual disease (MRD) prior to alloBMT confers an increased risk of relapse. Blinatumomab eradicates persistent or recurrent MRD at levels ≥10 -3 in 78% of B ALL. However, post-hoc analyses of patients who have undergone alloBMT following blinatumomab for MRD demonstrate non-relapse mortality (NRM) of 36.5%. NRM following nonmyeloablative (NMAC) alloBMT with high-dose post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is just 11%. Given broadly similar outcomes between HLA-matched MAC alloBMT and HLA-haploidentical NMAC alloBMT following PTCy, we have shifted to using exclusively NMAC alloBMT with PTCy and sought to explore outcomes depending on receipt of pre-transplant blinatumomab. Methods: The bone marrow transplant database at Johns Hopkins was queried for adult patients with Ph-negative B-ALL who received NMAC alloBMT in CR1 using PTCy between January 2008 and July 2020. Characteristics of patients were summarized and compared using the student's T test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Estimators of OS and RFS were reported using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in time-to-event outcomes were estimated using Cox proportional hazards model for OS and RFS, and Fine and Gray's model for cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR)/NRM considering competing events. Results: Among the 50 identified patients undergoing 1 st transplant in CR1 with NMAC, all received conditioning with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide followed by total body irradiation (TBI). In addition to PTCy, all patients received mycophenolate mofetil and either tacrolimus or sirolimus as GVHD prophylaxis. Sixteen patients (32%) received blinatumomab in CR1 or achieved CR1 following blinatumomab and proceeded to transplant without intervening therapy, while 34 patients (68%) did not. At the time of treatment with blinatumomab; 3 patients had >5% blasts after chemotherapy, 8 had persistent or recurrent MRD >10 -4 after chemotherapy, and 5 had no evidence of MRD at a sensitivity of 10 -4. Among the 5 MRD- patients treated with blinatumomab; 1 had been refractory to their first course of chemotherapy (67% blasts), 3 had MRD >10 -4 at the first MRD response assessment following chemotherapy, and 1 had CNS involvement at diagnosis. The demographics of these two groups are presented in Table 1 and separated by pre-transplant blinatumomab status. The groups were well balanced in terms of gender, age, WBC at diagnosis, CNS involvement at diagnosis, and donor type. Patients who received blinatumomab were more likely to have been refractory to their initial course of chemotherapy and were transplanted later after their initial diagnosis than those who did not. All patients who received blinatumomab were MRD-negative at a sensitivity of 10 -4 prior to their transplant, while 11.8% of patients who did not receive blinatumomab were MRD-positive. Relapse-free and overall survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, and non-relapse mortality by receipt of blinatumomab prior to transplant are shown in Figure 1. Non-relapse mortality was not increased among patients who received pre-transplant blinatumomab (HR=1.06, p=0.94). The causes of non-relapse mortality included GVHD (1) and secondary malignancy (1) in patients who received blinatumomab; and infection (1), bleeding (1), secondary malignancy (1), and other (1) in patients who did not receive blinatumomab. Receipt of pre-transplant blinatumomab was associated with a decreased cumulative incidence of relapse (HR=0.15, p=0.07) and improved relapse-free survival (HR=0.32, p=0.07). Overall survival (HR=0.63, p=0.5) between the two groups was similar, likely reflecting the efficacy of salvage therapies such as CD19 CAR T cells; blinatumomab; and inotuzumab in the relapsed, post-transplant population. Conclusions: Treatment with blinatumomab prior to NMAC alloBMT with PTCy in CR1 for Ph-negative B ALL did not increase NRM and produced a 3-year RFS of 81%. The low CIR and NRM of NMAC alloBMT in an MRD-negative CR1 following blinatumomab suggest it could be a viable alternative to MAC. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Webster: AmGen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. DeZern: Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Taiho: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Levis: Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas and FujiFilm: Research Funding; Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Daiichi-Sankyo, FujiFilm, and Menarini: Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghiaur: Syros Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Menarini Richerche: Research Funding. Hourigan: Sellas: Research Funding. Jain: Syneos Health: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; CareDx: Other: for advisory board participation; Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: for advisory board participation; Targeted Healthcare Communications: Consultancy. Ali: Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Aduro: Consultancy; Poseida: Research Funding; Aduro: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase I Study of Ixazomib Added to Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Older Adults

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139661 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 41-42

Author(s):

Philip C. Amrein ◽

Karen K. Ballen ◽

Kristen E. Stevenson ◽

Traci M. Blonquist ◽

Andrew M. Brunner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Survival Estimate ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Experienced Grade

Introduction: While progress has been made in the treatment of childhood leukemia, the outlook for patients >60 years of age with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is poor with complete remission rates (CR) of approximately 60% and 3-year survivals (OS) of less than 15%. Intensified treatment in a later CALGB trial showed little improvement with a CR=61% and 5-year OS=6% (Stock, Cancer 2013). Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor, which has shown single agent activity and promising combination activity in pediatric ALL patients (Messinger, Blood 2012). We sought to assess the safety and tolerability, as well as early efficacy of adding ixazomib to a current MGH-DFCI/HCC multi-agent regimen for older adults with ALL. Methods: Patients aged 51 to 75 years of age with newly diagnosed B-ALL and T-ALL were screened for eligibility. Patients with mature ALL (including Burkitt's) were excluded. Patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL (BCR-ABL1+) were eligible, and dasatinib was added to the chemotherapy on Day 10 for these patients. The chemotherapy treatment schedule from induction through maintenance is outlined in Table 1. A standard 3 + 3 patient cohort dose escalation design was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ixazomib during induction for these patients, the primary objective of the trial. After consolidation I, patients in complete remission (CR) with a suitable donor were offered a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as per institutional guidelines. Those not going to HSCT continued therapy as noted in the table. Results: There were 19 patients with B-ALL enrolled, none with T-ALL. Among these patients, 7 harbored BCR-ABL1 rearrangements. The median age was 65 years, 74% were male, and 90% had a performance status 0 or 1. The MTD was 2.3 mg of ixazomib, as 2 patients at 3.0 mg developed DLT's: a grade 3 peripheral neuropathy and a grade 5 acute kidney injury (Table 2). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities encountered at any time consisted mainly of grade 4 neutropenia in 13 patients and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 12 patients. One patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia and 5 patients experienced grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Two patients with grade 2 neuropathy did not meet the definition of DLT. Among the 19 patients, 15 (79%, [95% confidence interval (CI), 54-94%]) achieved CR (14) or CRi (1), and 5 patients went on to HSCT. The median follow-up time was 2 years (range, 1-5) for 8 patients remaining alive. The 1-year overall survival estimate was 53% [95% CI, 29-72%], while the 2-year overall survival estimate was 47% [95% CI, 24-67%]. Conclusions: A dose of 2.3 mg of ixazomib in combination with induction chemotherapy among older patients with ALL was well-tolerated and associated with a promising rate of complete remission. Disclosures Amrein: Takeda: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Brunner:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Forty-Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding. Hobbs:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Constellation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Neuberg:Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Madrigak Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fathi:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Newlink Genetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Blueprint: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: MLN 9708, ixazomib is FDA approved for multiple myeloma. In this trial it is used to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Download Full-text

Major Improvement of Invasive Aspergillosis Outcome Is Not Enough to Improve Overall Survival In Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: Results From a Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1244.1244 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1244-1244

Author(s):

Géraldine Salmeron ◽

Raphaël Porcher ◽

Anne Bergeron ◽

Marie Robin ◽

Regis Peffault de Latour ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Abstract 1244 Background. Voriconazole (V) treatment has been shown to improve the 12 week (W) survival rate of hematological patients (pts) with invasive aspergillosis (IA), including recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT). We investigated whether this early survival advantage could translate into a significant increase in overall survival. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive pts who received a transplant between Sept. 1997 and Dec. 2008 at Saint-Louis Hospital and were diagnosed as having IA. The temporal origin of the study was the date of IA diagnosis for each patient. Factors associated with survival were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models. Separate models were estimated for survival up to 12 W and for survival between 12 W and 24 months (M) in pts surviving longer than 12 W. The deaths of pts with and without IA were analyzed with a competing risk framework. Cumulative incidence curves were compared using Gray's tests. Results. Our study examined 89 IA pts. The median follow-up was 70 M (range, 11–130 M). Two pts did not receive any antifungal treatment and were excluded from subsequent analyses. Of the 87 pts, 42 received first-line V and 45 primarily received a lipid formulation of amphotericin B (n=25), amphotericin B deoxycholate (n=10), caspofungin (n=8) or itraconazole (n=2). The primary characteristics of pts with IA and their causes of death, separated by V as first-line treatment, are shown in the table below. The median survival was 2.6 M, and the overall survival at 24 M was 19% (95% CI 12–30 M) (see figure). Overall, the survival rates of the two groups were significantly different (P= 0.010). However, the differences in survival were quite dramatic prior to 10 M, whereas both survival curves became very close after one year. At 18 M, the numbers of surviving pts were almost identical in the two groups [19% (95% CI: 11–34%) in pts who did not receive V as first-line treatment vs. 21% (95% CI 11–38%) in pts who did]. Pts who did not receive V as a first-line treatment displayed a higher probability of dying from IA than those who did (P=0.004), whereas opposite results were found for mortality in pts without IA (P=0.006). The 24-M cumulative incidence of death from IA was 47% (95% CI 31–61%) in the no V group and 19% (95% CI 9–33%) in the group treated with V. The 24-M cumulative incidence of death in pts without IA was 4% (95% CI 7–14%) in the no V group and 27% (95% CI 14–42%) in pts treated with V. The probability of death from another cause, with IA, was similar in both groups (29% vs. 36% at 24 M; P=0.46). After adjusting for donor type, conditioning regimen, progressive GVHD at diagnosis of IA and cumulated steroid dose (mg/kg) in the W preceding IA diagnosis, administration of V as first-line treatment was found to decrease the risk of death during the first 12 W by approximately 70% [HR=0.31 (95% CI 0.16–0.60); P=0.0005]. Conversely, analysis of mortality between 12 W and 24 M failed to identify any significant predictor of risk of death; however, only 24 pts died during this period. Conclusions. The finding that first-line treatment with V, which is associated with a tremendous improvement in IA outcome, does not translate into an increase in overall survival (even in the context of early diagnosis) is striking. Diagnosis of IA following HSCT, whatever the outcome, appears to be a strong marker for poor long-term prognosis. Disclosures: Bergeron: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau, none; Merck: Speakers Bureau, none; Schering: Speakers Bureau, none. Sulahian:Pfizer: Research Funding, non; Merck: Research Funding, none. Ribaud:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, none; Schering: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau, none; Gilead: Speakers Bureau, none.

Download Full-text

The Abundance of Certain Bacteria in the Intestinal Flora Is Associated with Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.744.744 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 744-744 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jonathan Peled ◽

Eric R. Littman ◽

Lilan Ling ◽

Satyajit Kosuri ◽

Molly Maloy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Intestinal Flora ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Streptococcus Anginosus ◽

Conditioning Intensity

Abstract The major causes of mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) are relapse, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and infection. We have previously reported that changes in the intestinal flora can affect GVHD, bacteremia, and overall survival. As intestinal bacteria are potent modulators of systemic immune responses, and since GVHD is correlated with graft-versus-tumor activity, we hypothesized that components of the intestinal flora could be associated with relapse after allo-HSCT. We applied a biomarker-discovery approach and performed a retrospective observational analysis of 160 adults who received an unmodified (T-cell-replete) allograft. Patients were prospectively enrolled in a fecal biospecimen-collection protocol. For this analysis, we selected patients who had at least one specimen during the first 3 weeks following allo-HSCT. The primary diseases in this cohort were AML (37%), Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (33%), ALL (8%), MDS (7%), CLL (6%), Hodgkin's Lymphoma (6%), CML (2%), and myeloproliferative neoplasm (2%). The mean age of the patients was 52 years (range 21-75). They were conditioned with ablative (17%), reduced-intensity (64%), and nonmyeloablative (19%) regimens. They received grafts from cord blood (46%), unrelated adults (33%), or related adults (22%). Among adult grafts, 92% were from peripheral blood and 8% were from bone marrow. A census of the bacterial species in each stool sample was generated by 16S rRNA deep-sequencing as previously described (Jenq et al., BiolBone Marrow Transplant 2015). The area under the curve of bacterial abundance over time was used as a measure of each patient's cumulative exposure to each bacterial taxon. Bacterial taxa of each patient present at a frequency >1% were evaluated for association with the outcome of relapse or progression of disease within the first year after allo-HSCT using linear discriminant analysis of effect size (LEfSe), a common approach in microbiota studies (Segata et al., Genome Biology, 2011). Among the taxons most significantly associated with freedom from relapse were members of the human oral flora including Streptococcus anginosus. After stratifying the patients by median abundance, we found that those with higher abundance of this bacterium had less relapse after transplantation (Left figure, p = 0.0014). We also identified bacteria associated with increased risk of relapse, such as Enterococcus faecium (Right figure, p = 0.0103). We evaluated these bacteria as biomarkers in multivariate Cox models adjusted for three factors that were associated with relapse in this cohort: Refined Disease Risk Index (RDRI, Armand et al., Blood 2014), conditioning intensity, and graft source (cord blood vs. adult donor). Streptococcus anginosus predicted relapse in a multivariate model adjusted for all three factors (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.96, p = 0.041). Enterococcus faecium predicted relapse in a model adjusted for RDRI and conditioning intensity but failed to do so in a model additionally adjusted for graft source. In this analysis there was no formal adjustment for multiple comparisons; these data are now being validated in an additional cohort of patients whose samples are being sequenced. Finally, although we have previously reported that low bacterial diversity is associated with decreased overall survival after allo-HSCT (Taur et al., Blood 2014), we did not find an association between bacterial diversity and relapse as assessed by reciprocal Simpson diversity index (p > 0.1). Thus, the results of this retrospective analysis have identified an association between relapse after allo-HSCT and the abundance of two bacteria in the intestinal flora. These might serve as potential novel diagnostics or therapeutic targets to prevent relapse and improve overall survival after allo-HSCT. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Peled: Merck: Research Funding. Giralt:SANOFI: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; TAKEDA: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AMGEN: Consultancy, Research Funding; JAZZ: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CELGENE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Perales:Merck: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; NMDP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. van den Brink:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Other: Advisory board attendee; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tobira Therapeutics: Other: Advisory board attendee; Regeneron: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Pediatric-Inspired Chemotherapy Incorporating Pegaspargase Is Safe and Results in High Rates of MRD Negativity in Adults Ages 18-60 with Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-115486 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4013-4013 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Mark Blaine Geyer ◽

Ellen K. Ritchie ◽

Arati V. Rao ◽

M. Isabella Cazacu ◽

Shreya Vemuri ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Philadelphia Chromosome ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Lymphoblastic Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Among adolescents and young adults with (w/) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL), treatment using a pediatric (vs. adult) regimen appears to achieve superior event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS); this observation has driven increased interest in adapting pediatric regimens for middle-aged adults w/ ALL/LBL. However, greater risk of toxicities associated w/ asparaginase complicates administration of pediatric-inspired regimens in adults. We therefore designed a pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimen w/ doses of pegaspargase (PEG) rationally synchronized to limit overlapping toxicities w/ other chemotherapeutic agents. Methods: We conducted a phase II multi-center trial in adults ages 18-60 w/ newly-diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) ALL/LBL (NCT01920737). Pts w/ Ph+ ALL or Burkitt-type ALL were ineligible. The treatment regimen consisted of 2-phase induction (I-1, I-2), followed by consolidation w/ 2 courses of alternating high-dose methotrexate-based intensification and reinduction, followed by 3 years of maintenance (Figure 1). PEG 2000 IU/m2 was administered in each of the 6 intensive courses of induction/consolidation at intervals of ≥4 weeks. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed in bone marrow (BM) by multiparameter flow cytometry (FACS) on day (d) 15 of I1 and following I-1 and I-2. Any detectable MRD (even <0.01% of BM WBCs) was considered positive. Toxicities were assessed by CTCAE v4.0. Results: 39 pts were enrolled (30M, 9F), w/ B-ALL (n=28), T-ALL (n=7), B-LBL (n=3), and T-LBL (n=5). Median age at start of treatment was 38.3 years (range 20.2-60.4), w/ 18 pts age 40-60. Grade 3-4 toxicities associated w/ PEG are summarized in Table 1. Grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinemia was observed post-PEG in I-1 in 9 pts, but only recurred thereafter in 1/8 pts resuming PEG. Pts completing consolidation on protocol (n=16) received median of 6 doses of PEG (range, 2-6). Four pts developed hypersensitivity to PEG and subsequently received Erwinia asparaginase. PEG was discontinued in 4 additional pts due to hepatotoxicity (n=2), pancreatitis (n=1), and physician preference (n=1). Of pts w/ available response assessments, 35/36 (97%) achieved morphologic complete response (CR) or CR w/ incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) following I-1 (n=34) or I-2 (n=1). Both pts not achieving CR/CRi after I-I had early T-precursor ALL; one of these pts was withdrawn from study, and the other (w/ M2 marrow after I-1) achieved CR after I-2. Of the pts w/ ALL (excluding LBL) w/ available BM MRD assessments, 11/28 (39%) achieved undetectable MRD by FACS following I-1; 18/22 (82%) achieved undetectable MRD by FACS following I-2. Of the pts w/ LBL w/ available BM MRD assessments, 7/7 (100%) achieved or maintained undetectable MRD by FACS following I-1 and I-2. Ten pts underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in CR1. Seven pts experienced relapse at median 15.2 months from start of treatment (range, 5.4-30.4), of whom 6 subsequently underwent 1st (n=5) or 2nd (n=1) alloHCT. Of the 11 pts w/ ALL w/ undetectable MRD following I-1, only one has relapsed. Five patients have died, including 2 pts in CR1 (from sepsis and multi-organ system failure), and 3 pts in relapse. At median follow-up of 22.3 months among surviving pts (range, 1.0-48.1), median EFS and OS (Figure 2A&B) have not been reached (EFS not censored at alloHCT). 3-year EFS was 62.1% (95% CI: 38.4-78.9%) and 3-year OS was 80.0% (95% CI: 57.5-91.4%). Conclusions: PEG can be incorporated into pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimens w/ manageable toxicity for appropriately selected adults up to age 60 w/ Ph- ALL/LBL. While PEG-related AEs are common, few pts require permanent discontinuation of asparaginase. Grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinemia was common, particularly post-I-1, but recurred infrequently when PEG was continued. Two induction courses resulted in a high rate of MRD negativity post-I-2 and translated to a low rate of relapse. Though further follow-up is required, 3-year EFS is encouraging. Data regarding asparaginase enzyme activity and silent inactivation w/ neutralizing anti-PEG antibody will be presented. Ongoing and future studies will additionally investigate whether incorporating novel therapies (e.g. blinatumomab, nelarabine) into frontline consolidation therapy may reduce risk of relapse among adults receiving PEG-containing regimens. Disclosures Geyer: Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Ritchie:Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rao:Kite, a Gilead Company: Employment. Tallman:Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory board; AROG: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; BioSight: Other: Advisory board; Orsenix: Other: Advisory board; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Douer:Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria; Spectrum: Consultancy. Park:Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Poor Outcomes with Hyper CVAD Induction for T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3762.3762 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3762-3762 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Vamsi K Kota ◽

Amanda Redden Hathaway ◽

Bijal D. Shah ◽

Deniz Peker ◽

Ling Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Relapse Free Survival ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Genetics Research

Abstract Background: T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL/LBL) in adults is an aggressive bone marrow malignancy that historically has a poor prognosis. Hyper-CVAD/methotrexate-cytarabine (hyper CVAD) regimen is a commonly used induction regimen following the protocol developed at MD Anderson Cancer center. Recent reports from Swedish Cancer Registry showed that relapse rates were much higher than expected with this regimen. We report our retrospective experiences across three different centers, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University (Atlanta), University of Alabama Cancer Center (Birmingham) and Moffitt Cancer Center, (Tampa), with the use of this regimen for management of T-ALL/LBL. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all adult T-ALL/T-LBL cases at three large cancer centers between the years 2005-2015, treated at the physician's discretion. Data collected included patient demographics, tumor characteristics (white count at diagnosis, flow cytometry, FISH, cytogenetics, bone marrow involvement), treatment regimens and patient outcomes. Since hyper CVAD is a commonly used regimen outside of clinical trials, we focused our analysis on outcomes with this regimen. This regimen consisted of 4 courses of hyper-CVAD (fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine [VCR], doxorubicin, dexamethasone; the odd courses 1, 3, 5, 7); and 4 courses of MTX-Ara-C (methotrexate-cytarabine; the even courses 2, 4, 6, 8). CNS prophylaxis was given to all patients as per standard of care recommendations. All patients eligible for maintenance received 2 years of POMP (6 mercaptopurine, methotrexate, vincristine and prednisone) maintenance. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined looking at medians and interquartile ranges of times to events. Kaplan Meier curves provided a graphical representation of the survival probability. Results: The final analysis included 95 adult patients with 64/95 (67%) patients receiving hyper-CVAD induction. Among the hyper-CVAD patients the median age at diagnosis was 30 (range 17-74). 71% of patients were male. Median white cell count (WBC) was 13.6/mm3 (1.7-500). Cytogenetic analysis revealed diploid in 36, complex (1 or more abnormalities in 16) and was not available in 12. WBC count was > 100,000/mm3 in 9 patients. 14 patients had mediastinal disease while 7 had CNS disease at diagnosis. Hyper-CVAD was the primary induction regimen in 56/64. Other patients either started on non-hyper CVAD induction prior to switching (n=3) or had asparaginase added to induction (n=5). The median number of cycles given as 7 (range 2-10) with 27(45%) patients receiving the planned 8 cycles. 37 patients did not complete 8 cycles due to stem cell transplant in remission (n=12), progressive disease (n=10) and unclear reasons (n=15). After induction therapy, remission status was unknown in 3 patients while 43/61 patients (70%) achieved remission. Maintenance with POMP was started in 21 patients that were in remission while 12 patients were taken to transplant without starting on maintenance. At the time of analysis, 23/64 (35%) patients are alive. The median relapse free survival was 387 days (12.9 months) and the median overall survival was 536 days (17.6 months). Excluding one patient lost to follow up, 44/63 (69.8%) relapsed. There was no difference in relapse versus non relapse patients in terms of median age (30 vs 33 years), median WBC at diagnosis (13.2 vs 13.6 mm3). Relapse rate was lower in patients with diploid karyotype (22/36, 61%) as compared to those with complex karyotype (14/16). Median survival in patients post relapse was 150 days. Only 9 patients were able to go for transplant after relapse with post transplant survival also being low (6 deaths). For the entire group, the two year survival was 35%. Conclusion: Our multi-institutional retrospective review shows that outcomes are poor across various centers in patients outside of clinical trials. This is the largest reported series of patients with adult T-ALL/T-LBL treated with hyper-CVAD outside of clinical trials. This data warrants investigation with newer agents to improve outcomes in this disease. Figure 1. Relapse free survival and overall survival in patients treated with hyper-CVAD (n=64) Figure 1. Relapse free survival and overall survival in patients treated with hyper-CVAD (n=64) Disclosures Kota: Leukemia Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hathaway:OnQ Health: Research Funding. Shah:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Acetylon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PLexus Communications: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Honoraria; Rosetta Genomics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Jillella:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Borate:Genoptix: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Central Nervous System Involvement By Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148447 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2426-2426

Author(s):

Nicole McLaughlin ◽

Jonas Paludo ◽

Yucai Wang ◽

David J. Inwards ◽

Nora Bennani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Data Monitoring Committee ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Control Group ◽

Cns Involvement ◽

Extranodal Involvement ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Scientific Advisory Board ◽

Scientific Advisory

Abstract Background: While extranodal involvement by mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is relatively common, involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) is rare (<5% of cases), with limited treatment options. We report the outcomes of 36 patients (pts) with CNS involvement compared to 72 matched control MCL pts without CNS involvement. Methods: MCL pts with CNS involvement seen at Mayo Clinic between 1/1995-9/2020 were identified using the Mayo Data Explorer tool. CNS involvement was defined by tissue biopsy confirmed CNS MCL, CSF analysis demonstrating lymphoma cells, and/or neuroimaging findings compatible with CNS involvement. A 2:1 control group of MCL pts without CNS involvement, matched by age (+/- 2 years) and year of diagnosis (+/- 1 year), was selected among all MCL cases. Medical records were reviewed for baseline characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes. Kaplan-Meier method was used for time to event analysis. Wilcoxon test was used to compare continuous variables and Chi square test was used for categorical variables. Results: Out of 1,753 pts with MCL, 36 (2%) had evidence of CNS involvement, including 4 pts with CNS involvement at initial MCL diagnosis. Baseline characteristics of pts with CNS involvement (CNS MCL group) and those without CNS involvement (control group) are shown in Table 1. At MCL diagnosis, non-CNS extranodal involvement was seen in 30 (83%) pts in the CNS MCL group (24 pts with 1 site and 6 pts with ≥ 2 sites), with bone marrow being the most common extranodal site of involvement (n=24, 67%). For the control group, 54 (75%) pts had extranodal involvement (44 pts with 1 site and 10 pts with ≥ 2 sites), and bone marrow was also the most common extranodal site of involvement (n=50, 69%). Notably, advanced stage disease (stage 3-4) was more commonly seen in the CNS MCL group (n=32, 97%) than in the control group (n=59, 83%) (p=0.04) at MCL diagnosis. Blastoid variant was present in a higher proportion of pts in the CNS MCL group (n=11, 31%) compared to the control group (n=8, 11%) (p=0.02). The CNS MCL group also presented with a higher median serum LDH at diagnosis (239 U/L [range 153-1901] vs. 187 U/L [range 124-588], p=0.02), and higher Ki-67 (40% [range 15-100] vs. 30% [range 10-90], p=0.04) compared to the control group. The most common frontline treatment regimen was anthracycline-based therapies (i.e. R-CHOP, Nordic regimen, R-hyperCVAD) for both groups (58% in CNS MCL group and 56% in control group). 14 (39%) pts in the CNS MCL group underwent autologous stem cell transplant in CR1 vs. 31 pts (43%) in the control group. Similar use of rituximab maintenance was seen in both groups (31% in CNS MCL group and 25% in control group). Median total lines of therapy from initial MCL diagnosis was 3 (range 1-9) in CNS MCL group and 2 (range 1-9) in the control group. The median follow-up from MCL diagnosis was 134 months (95% CI:119-163) for the entire cohort. Median OS from MCL diagnosis was 50.3 months (95% CI: 20.9-71.1) for the CNS MCL group compared to 97.1 months (95% CI: 82.6-192.7; p=<0.001) for the control group (Figure 1). Median time from MCL diagnosis to CNS involvement was 25 months (range 0-167). Median OS from CNS involvement was 4.7 months (95% CI: 2.3-6.7). At last follow up, 31 (86%) pts were deceased from the CNS MCL group, compared to 38 (52%) pts in the control group. For the CNS MCL group, the causes of death were CNS lymphoma in 10 (32%) pts, systemic lymphoma in 9 (29%) pts, treatment-related complication in 7 (23%) pts, and other/unknown in 5 (16%) pts. For the control group, the causes of death were systemic lymphoma in 15 (39%) pts, treatment-related in 2 (5%) pts, and other/unknown in 21 (55%) pts. Conclusion: In pts with MCL, CNS involvement is associated with worse outcomes as evident by a shorter median OS from initial MCL diagnosis (50 months vs. 97 months). Involvement of the CNS by lymphoma is an important contributor for the shorter OS as suggested by the median OS of only 5 months from CNS involvement. Advanced stage, blastoid variant, elevated LDH, and elevated Ki67 at MCL diagnosis were features more commonly seen in the CNS MCL cohort. Validation of risk factors at initial MCL diagnosis associated with CNS involvement and exploring the role of CNS prophylaxis are important topics for further investigation. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Paludo: Karyopharm: Research Funding. Wang: Novartis: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MorphoSys: Research Funding; InnoCare: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LOXO Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Bennani: Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory Board; Daichii Sankyo Inc: Other: Advisory Board; Kyowa Kirin: Other: Advisory Board; Vividion: Other: Advisory Board; Kymera: Other: Advisory Board; Verastem: Other: Advisory Board. Nowakowski: Celgene, MorphoSys, Genentech, Selvita, Debiopharm Group, Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene, NanoString Technologies, MorphoSys: Research Funding. Witzig: Karyopharm Therapeutics, Celgene/BMS, Incyte, Epizyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS, Acerta Pharma, Kura Oncology, Acrotech Biopharma, Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding. Habermann: Seagen: Other: Data Monitoring Committee; Tess Therapeutics: Other: Data Monitoring Committee; Incyte: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Morphosys: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Loxo Oncology: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Eli Lilly & Co.,: Other: Scientific Advisor. Ansell: Bristol Myers Squibb, ADC Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Regeneron, Affimed, AI Therapeutics, Pfizer, Trillium and Takeda: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (Ino) May Overcome the Impact of Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph)-like Phenotype in Adult Patients (pts) with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126940 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1641-1641 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Elias Jabbour ◽

Kathryn G. Roberts ◽

Koji Sasaki ◽

Yaqi Zhao ◽

Chunxu Qu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Impact

Background: Ino showed significant activity in phase II trials in pts with R/R ALL, that was subsequently confirmed in Phase III trial where Ino demonstrated higher response rates and superior overall survival vs standard of care chemotherapy (SOC) in adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL).Ph-like or BCR-ABL1-like ALL possesses a gene expression profile similar to that of BCR-ABL1 ALL but lacks the BCR-ABL1 fusion protein. It is characterized by increased expression of hematopoietic stem-cell genes, deletion of B-cell lineage genes and kinase-activating alterations. Ph-like ALL is associated with refractoriness to standard induction/consolidation chemotherapy and poor prognosis. Aim: To evaluate the outcomes of pts with R/R Ph-like ALL treated in phase II trial with Ino monotherapy. Methods: We performed an integrated analysis of whole genome sequencing (to identify sequence mutations, structural variations and DNA copy number alterations), and transcriptome sequencing (RNAseq; to quantify gene expression, determine Ph-like gene expression profile and identify fusions) on 53 patients' samples treated with Ino between June 2010 and September 2012. Results: Fifty-three evaluable pts with R/R ALL with stored baseline samples were analyzed. Pts characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Median age was 50 years. Ino was given as Salvage 1, Salvage 2, and Salvage 3 and beyond in 20 (38%), 18 (34%), and 15 (28%) pts, respectively. Figure 1 reflects the different genomic subgroups identified among 53 evaluable pts. Ph-like gene signature was found in 12 pts (22.6%). Among these 12 pts, 6 had IGH-CRLF2, 2 IGH-EPOR, 1 SNX2-ABL1, and 3 had no fusions identified. The overall response rates (ORR) were 54% [complete remission (CR) 20%, CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) 32%, and marrow CR (CRi) 2%]. Among pts with morphologic remission, 46% and 82% achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at CR and at any time, respectively. The ORR for pts with Ph-like ALL, Ph-positive ALL, ALL with KMT2A, and others were 58% (CR=25%; CRh=33%), 42% (CR=8%; CRh=33%), 57% (CR=14%; CRh=29%; CRi=14%), and 56% (CR=26%; CRh=30%), respectively. The respective overall MRD negativity rates were 71%, 100%, 75%, and 83% (Table 1). The median follow-up was 60 months. The median event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.3 and 5.4 months, respectively. There was no difference in EFS and OS between the subgroups analyzed (P=0.464; P=0.824). The median EFS and OS were 4.5 and 4.5 months for pts with Ph-like, 3.1 and 7.2 months for those with Ph-positive ALL, 2.8 and 4.4 months for those with KMT2A, and 2.2 and 4.6 months for others (Table 1). 21 (40%) pts had subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplant; 6 (50%), 3 (25%), 4 (57%), and 8 (36%) in each subgroup, respectively. The rate of VOD was 3 (6%) with no difference among different subgroups. Conclusion: The current analysis suggest that Ino therapy may overcome the impact of Ph-like phenotype in pts with ALL. Confirmation of these findings in a larger cohort and in frontline ALL patients is needed. Disclosures Jabbour: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cyclacel LTD: Research Funding. Sasaki:Pfizer: Consultancy; Otsuka: Honoraria. Jain:Precision Biosciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ravandi:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Xencor: Consultancy, Research Funding; Macrogenix: Consultancy, Research Funding; Menarini Ricerche: Research Funding; Selvita: Research Funding; Cyclacel LTD: Research Funding. Short:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Garcia-Manero:Amphivena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Helsinn: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Konopleva:Cellectis: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy, Honoraria; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; Kisoji: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ablynx: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffman La-Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding. Mullighan:Illumina: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: sponsored travel; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: speaker, sponsored travel, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: speaker, sponsored travel. Kantarjian:Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Primary Central Nervous System Involvement at Initial Diagnosis Remains an Independent Risk Factor for Relapse in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in CR1

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-149695 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2901-2901

Author(s):

Mohamed A. Kharfan-Dabaja ◽

Myriam Labopin ◽

Ali Bazarbachi ◽

Urpu Salmenniemi ◽

Stephan Mielke ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Independent Risk Factor ◽

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Safety Monitoring ◽

Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽

Cns Involvement ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Background: A recent study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT demonstrated that outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have improved significantly over time and that total body irradiation (TBI) should be considered as the preferable type of myeloablative conditioning (MAC). This study, however, did not compare outcomes of allo-HCT in patients with CNS involvement (CNS-pos) vs. those without CNS disease (CNS-neg). Study population: Here, we evaluate post allo-HCT outcomes of 547 patients (CNS-pos at initial presentation=96, CNS-neg=451) who underwent the procedure in first complete remission (CR1) between 2009 and 2019 at an EBMT participating transplant center. The distribution of ALL subtypes were as follows: CNS-pos (Ph-neg B ALL=28%, Ph-pos B ALL=27%, and T-cell ALL=45%) and for CNS-neg (Ph-neg B ALL=21%, Ph-pos B ALL=44%, and T-cell ALL=35%), p=0.01. The primary endpoint was leukemia-free survival (LFS). Results: The median follow up was not statistically different between the CNS-pos (78.7 months) and the CNS-neg group (67.2 months), p=0.58. Patients in the CNS-pos group were younger (median age 31.3 vs. 39.7 years, p=0.004), received the procedure more recently (median year 2012 vs. 2010, p=0.003), were less likely to have a Karnofsky score of equal or higher than 90 (70.8% vs. 81.9%, p=0.017), or to have received peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) (61.5% vs. 72.7%, p=0.028). The groups did not differ in regards to donor source (URD, 50% vs. 56.5%, p=0.24) or the intensity of the preparative regimen (MAC, 82.3% vs. 85.6%, p=0.41). In multivariate analysis, CNS-pos were associated with higher cumulative incidence of relapse (HR=1.58 (95%CI=1.06-2.35), P=0.025) and a trend for an inferior leukemia-free survival (LFS) (HR=1.38 (95%CI=0.99-1.92), p=0.057), but did not adversely impact overall survival (OS) (HR=1.28 (95%CI=0.89-1.85), p=0.18). A subgroup multivariate analysis limited to patients with CNS-pos showed that prescribing a TBI MAC regimen (vs. others) results in a lower cumulative incidence of relapse (HR=0.35 (95%CI=0.15-0.79), p=0.012) and better LFS (HR=0.43 (95%CI=0.22-0.83), p=0.01) and OS (HR=0.44 (95%CI=0.21-0.92), p=0.03). Use of PBSC (vs. BM) was also independently associated with better OS (HR=0.53 (95%CI=0.29-0.99), p=0.046). Conclusion: Notwithstanding the inherent limitations of registry data, particularly ascertaining the absence of CNS involvement in the CNS-neg group, our results show CNS involvement as an independent risk factor for relapse following allo-HCT. Our data support, nonetheless, the choice of a TBI-based MAC regimen in this group of patients but stresses the need for close monitoring of relapse after allo-HCT. Disclosures Labopin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Bazarbachi: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Hikma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mielke: Immunicum: Other: Data safety monitoring board; DNA Prime SA: Speakers Bureau; Gilead/KITE: Other: Travel support, Expert panel ; Miltenyi: Other: Data safety monitoring board; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Speakers Bureau. Socie: Alexion: Research Funding. Huynh: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Yakoub-Agha: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Giebel: Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Peric: Therakos, Servier, MSD, Astellas, Novartis, Abbvie, Pfizer: Honoraria. Mohty: Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Reduced Intensity Delayed Intensification in Standard-Risk Patients Defined By Minimal Residual Disease in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of an International Randomized Trial in 1164 Patients (Trial AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4.4 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4-4 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Martin Schrappe ◽

Martin Zimmermann ◽

Anja Möricke ◽

Georg Mann ◽

Maria Grazia Valsecchi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Advisory Board ◽

P Value ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Childhood All ◽

Standard Risk ◽

Reduced Intensity

Abstract From 07/2000 to 06/2006, 4741 eligible pts with ALL (age range 1-17 years) were enrolled in the trial AIEOP-BFM-ALL 2000 (NCT 00430118 (BFM) and NCT 00613457 (AIEOP)). 1164 patients from Germany, Italy, Austria, and Switzerland entered the randomized comparison of protocol III (P-III) versus standard protocol II (P-II) for delayed reintensification in order to reduce treatment burden in the group of patients with best treatment response and lowest risk of relapse. P-III is shorter than P-II (duration 29 vs 49 days), the dose of dexamethasone in P-III is 30% less and the dose of vincristine, doxorubicine, and cyclophospamide 50% less than in P-II. The intention was to prove non-inferiority of the reduced intensity treatment as compared to standard treatment. Only patients who were defined as MRD standard risk (MRD-SR) being negative at both days 33 and 78 after start of induction therapy, using at least 2 molecular markers with sensitivity of at least 10-4, were eligible for the randomization. The main analysis was planned as a per protocol analysis of the 4-year disease free survival (4y-DFS). Stratification, induction and consolidation therapy and the results of a randomization in induction, dexamethasone at 10 mg/m2/d (DEXA) vs prednisone at 60 mg/m2/d (PRED), have been described earlier (A. Möricke et al, BLOOD 2016, M. Schrappe et al, BLOOD 2011, and V. Conter et al, BLOOD 2010). With a median follow-up of 8.6 years, 4y-DFS was 91.8% (SE 1.1%) and 95.8% (SE 0.8%) for patients who received P-III (N=584) or P-II (N=579), respectively (log-rank p=0.04). The lower limit of the one-sided 95% confidence interval for the DFS-rates was -6.4%, far below the non-inferiority range of -4%, (p-value on difference of the 4y-DFS estimates: 0.005). The 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 6.3% (SE 1.0%) and 3.2% (SE 0.7%), for P-III and P-II, respectively (Gray p=0.09). The results at 8 years were 89.2% (SE 1.3%) and 92.3% (SE 1.2%) for DFS, and 8.7% (SE 1.2) and 6.4% (SE 1.1%) for CIR (P-III vs P-II). The 8-year overall survival (OS) was 96.1% (SE 0.8%) and 98.0% (SE 0.6%, p=0.06) and the 8-year cumulative incidence of secondary malignancies was 1.3% (SE 0.5%) and 0.6% (SE 0.4%) for patients who received P-III and P-II, respectively. An intent-to-treat analysis revealed almost identical results. There were no major differences of the treatment effect in clinical and biological subgroups and in the subgroups of the two induction regimens (DEXA vs PRED) with the exception of age at diagnosis. For patients below 10 years of age the 4-DFS was 90.7% (SE 1.0%) vs 92.5 (SE 1.2, p=0.26) and for patients 10 years or older 81.6% (SE 4.0%) vs 90.3 (SE 4.1%, p=0.04), for P-III vs P-II, respectively. The pattern of relapse was similar after P-III and P-II. The incidence of death in remission was comparable being 0.9% (SE 0.4%) and 0.7% (SE 0.3%) for P-III and P-II. The rate of grade III/IV infections used as an indicator for relevant toxicity was essentially the same in P-III and P-II. In conclusion, in childhood ALL patients with most favorable prognosis, as predicted by complete MRD response already by day 33, an attempt to reduce the burden of chemotherapy by lower intensity delayed intensification achieved by replacing the traditional BFM protocol II with protocol III, was not successful due to evidence of more relapses observed in patients treated less intensively. Interestingly, almost identical rates of 5-year DFS and CIR (91% and 8% in AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 vs 93% and 6% in study DCOG 11) were observed. The DCOG authors considered the result of their non-randomized study sufficient to prove that therapy reduction is safely feasible in MRD negative patients defined identically (R. Pieters et al, JCO 2016). Our study underlines the importance of well-designed, sufficiently powered studies for prospective evaluation of treatment reduction in childhood ALL, a major challenge for developing future therapy strategies. Disclosures Möricke: JazzPharma: Honoraria, Other: Financial support of travel costs. Biondi:BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Cellgene: Other: Advisory Board.

Download Full-text

Influence of Treatment Facility Type and Annual Patient Volume on Overall Survival in Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-151888 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1348-1348

Author(s):

Xavier Andrade-Gonzalez ◽

Anuhya Kommalapati ◽

Allison M. Bock ◽

Jacqueline Wang ◽

Antoine Saliba ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Patient Volume ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Scientific Advisory Board ◽

Academic Center ◽

Scientific Advisory ◽

Lower Volume

Abstract Introduction: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an uncommon hematological malignancy with an estimated incidence of 1 per 100,000 persons per year in the United States and represents only about 5% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Several studies have shown that treatment at academic centers and a higher hospital case volume are associated with improved outcomes for uncommon hematological malignancies, probably due to increased provider expertise and access to novel therapies. Treatment of MCL can be complex given the heterogenous nature of the disease and a frequent need for autologous stem cell transplantation in eligible patients. However, the impact of treatment at an academic center and facility patient volume on the survival of patients with MCL has not been well studied in large cohorts. In this study, we utilized the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to investigate the impact of treatment at an academic center and treatment facility volume on the overall survival (OS) of patients with MCL. Methods: The NCDB was used to identify adult patients (≥ 18 years) with newly diagnosed MCL from 2004 through 2017. For facility patient volume analysis, patients were divided into groups based on the average number of new MCL patients seen annually: Tercile 1 [T1] (1-3 patients/year), Tercile 2 [T2] (4-5 patients/year) and Tercile 3 [T3] (≥6 patients/year). Treating centers were divided into Academic and Non-academic using the NCDB definitions. Academic centers were defined as centers that accessions more than 500 newly diagnosed cancer cases per year, participate in postgraduate medical education in at least four program areas including internal medicine and surgery and participates in cancer-related clinical trials. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox hazards proportional model. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25. Results: We identified 22,752 patients with MCL during the study period. 9,484 (42%) patients were treated at academic centers and 13,070 (57%) were treated at non-academic centers. In terms of facility patient volume 10,948 patients (48%) were in the T1 group, 4,637 (20%) were in the T2 group and 7,166 (31%) were in the T3 group. No significant differences were found in baseline demographics (age, gender, race/ethnicity, comorbidity scores), socioeconomical variables (insurance type, median income, area of residence) and disease-related factors (B-symptoms, Ann Arbor stage) between patients treated academic vs nonacademic centers, or between patients in T1 vs T2 vs T3 groups. Notably, compared to lower volume facilities, T3 facilities were more likely to be academic centers (T3: 81% vs T2: 42% vs T1: 16%, p<0.001) . After a median follow-up of 3.4 years, the median overall survival (OS) was 5.6 years for the entire cohort. The median OS was inferior for patients treated at lower volume facilities (4.1 years for T1, 5.1 years for T2 and 9.0 years for T3, p<0.001) (Figure 1A). Similarly, the median OS was shorter for patients treated at non-academic centers vs academic centers (4.3 years vs 7.5 years respectively, p<0.001) (Figure 1B). In a multivariate analysis, treatment at a lower patient volume facility (Hazard ratio [HR] Q1= 1.26 [95%CI = 1.18-1.34]) and treatment at a non-academic center (HR = 1.1, 95%CI = 1.01-1.12) were both independent prognostic factors of inferior OS, after adjusting for demographics (age, gender, ethnicity, area of residence) and socioeconomic variables (income and insurance status). Conclusion: Patients with MCL treated at academic and higher volume facilities had a higher OS compared to patients treated at non-academic and lower volume facilities.. Additional research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms behind these differences. Patients with MCL may benefit from an early referral to academic and high-volume centers. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Munoz: Merck: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Abbvie, Bayer, Gilead/Kite Pharma, Pfizer, Janssen, Juno/Celgene, BMS, Kyowa, Alexion, Beigene, Fosunkite, Innovent, Seattle Genetics, Debiopharm, Karyopharm, Genmab, ADC Therapeutics, Epizyme, Beigene, Servier: Consultancy; Gilead/Kite Pharma, Kyowa, Bayer, Pharmacyclics/Janssen, Seattle Genetics, Acrotech/Aurobindo, Beigene, Verastem, AstraZeneca, Celgene/BMS, Genentech/Roche.: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Physicians' Education Resource: Honoraria; Gilead/Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Kyowa: Honoraria; Bayer: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; OncView: Honoraria; Targeted Oncology: Honoraria. Paludo: Karyopharm: Research Funding. Habermann: Seagen: Other: Data Monitoring Committee; Incyte: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Tess Therapeutics: Other: Data Monitoring Committee; Morphosys: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Loxo Oncology: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Eli Lilly & Co.,: Other: Scientific Advisor. Nowakowski: Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Zai Labolatory: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Nanostrings: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Consultancy; Kymera Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Ryvu Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kyte Pharma: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Selvita: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bantham Pharmaceutical: Consultancy. Wang: Novartis: Research Funding; LOXO Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MorphoSys: Research Funding; InnoCare: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text