scholarly journals Immunosuppressive Therapy in Large Granular Lymphocyte Leukemia-Associated Pure Red Cell Aplasia: Cyclophosphamide Responded Better Than Cyclosporine

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1120-1120
Author(s):  
Xiaoqing Liu ◽  
Ruixin Li ◽  
Zhengyuan Liu ◽  
Jiongtao Zhou ◽  
Lang Cheng ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Large granular lymphocyte leukemia associated pure red cell aplasia (LGLL-PRCA) accounts for a significant portion of secondary PRCA. Cyclosporine (CsA) and cyclophosphamide (CTX) are the main immunosuppressive agents used in treating LGLL-PRCA [1]. Considering the cytotoxicity of CTX, CsA may be proposed as first-line therapy [2]. However, because of the rarity of LGLL-PRCA, long-term responses and relapse rates after CsA and CTX therapy are largely unknown. Methods and results From September 2009 to December 2020, we selected 65 uniformly diagnosed LGLL-PRCA and analyzed clinical features and treatment outcomes of CsA and CTX. In the present study, 43.1% harbored neutropenia (<1.5×10 9/L) and only 1 patient had spondyloarthritis (Table 1). Besides, we found that 9.2% developed recurrent oral ulcer and 18.5% had reduced serum complemet C3 level, both of which were related to abnormal immune status. In our cohort, 44 patients received CsA therapy and 21 patients received CTX therapy. 53.8% (35/65) obtained erythroid lineage response and 26.2% (17/65) achieved complete response. CTX produced higher response rate (81.0% vs 40.9%, P=0.002) and complete response rate (47.6% vs 15.9%, P=0.007) than CsA. We further analyzed related factors influencing efficacy by Binary-Logistic multivariate regression model and found that higher response rate was mainly related to CTX therapy (P=0.02) (Table 2). We detected STAT3 and STAT5b gene in 50 cases. None of the patients had STAT5b mutation and 14 patients had STAT3 mutation. 12 of 14 mutation cases were non-elderly patients (<60 years ). For younger patients, STAT3 mutation was more frequent (85.7% vs 22.2%, P<0.01). In STAT3 mutation group, patients appeared to respond better to CTX than CsA (83.3% vs 37.5%, P=0.138). Up to the last follow-up, 11 patients treated with CsA recurred after CsA reduction or discontinuation, with a median relapse time of 10 (3~80) months after remission. Only 1 patient relpsed after the discontinuation of CTX due to neutropenia and returned to remission status after CTX retreatment. In our research, CsA had higher recurrence rate than CTX without statistical significance (25.0% vs 4.8%, P=0.104). Discussion CsA may be proposed as first-line therapy for LGLL-PRCA [2,3]. CTX also appears to be a good treatment choice, but CTX should not be used for more than 12 months since associated toxicities and the risk for developing myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia. Therefore, it is necessary to compare the efficacy of CsA or CTX in the treatment of LGLL-PRCA. Deep sequencing analyses of residuals LGLL clones reveals that CTX could eradicate LGLL clones, providing durable response, low relapse rate, whereas CsA is associated with the persistence of leukemic clones, and high frequency of relapse [4]. Our results show that the response rate of CTX is higher than CsA (P=0.02), and the probability of recurrence is relatively low (25.0% vs 4.8%, P=0.104). This is consistent with the results of previous study by Rajala [4]. It was important to note that patients with STAT3 mutations are more likely to respond to MTX [5]. Our study showed that the response rate for CTX was 83.3% in patients with STAT3 mutations, which was seemingly higher than CsA (37.5%), although remained statistically insignificant (P=0.138) that might be due to small number of cases. Conclusions The results of the current study may reflect the real world experience of LGLL-PRCA in whom treated by CTX or CsA, may be limited by its retrospective nature, small cohorts. In preliminary conclusion, LGLL-PRCA could acquired better response to CTX than CsA. Besides, CTX may reduce relapse. References 1. Means RT Jr. Pure red cell aplasia. Blood, 2016, 128(21): 2504~9. 2. Moignet A, Lamy T. Latest Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book, 2018, 38: 616~25. 3. Go RS, Tefferi A, Li CY, et al. Lymphoproliferative disease of granular T lymphocytes presenting as aplastic anemia. Blood, 2000, 96(10):3644~6. 4. Rajala HLM, Olson T, Clemente MJ, et al. The analysis of clonal diversity and therapy responses using STAT3 mutations as a molecular marker in large granular lymphocytic leukemia. Haematologica, 2015, 100: 91~9. 5. Loughran TP, Zickl L, Olson TL, et al. Immunosuppressive therapy of LGL leukemia: prospective multicenter phase II study by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E5998). Leukemia, 2015, 29(4): 886~94. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 536-536
Author(s):  
Toru Kawakami ◽  
Nodoka Sekiguchi ◽  
Jun Kobayashi ◽  
Tatsuya Imi ◽  
Kazuyuki Matsuda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Dysregulation of T-cell mediated immunity is responsible for acquired pure red cell aplasia (PRCA). Although STAT3 mutations are frequently detected in patients with T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia (T-LGLL), which is often complicated by PRCA and is also reported to be associated with acquired aplastic anemia (AA) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), whether STAT3-mutated T cells are involved in the pathophysiology of PRCA and other types of bone marrow failure (BMF) remains unknown. Methods: Patients with AA, AA-paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (AA-PNH) syndrome, MDS or PRCA were enrolled in this study. We performed STAT3 mutation analyses of the peripheral blood mononuclear cells using an allele-specific PCR (AsPCR) to detect STAT3 Y640F or D661Y mutations and amplicon sequencing using primers covering entire coding region of STAT3. CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells or granulocytes were sorted, if possible, and also subjected to the analyses. The T-cell receptor (TCR) Vβ repertoire was analyzed using whole blood samples by flow cytometry. Results: A total of 124 patients including PRCA (n=42), AA (n=54), AA-PNH (n=7) and MDS (n=21) were enrolled. The subtypes of PRCA were as follows: idiopathic, n= 15, T-LGLL-associated, n=13; thymoma or thymic cancer-associated, n=7; autoimmune disease-associated, n=5; adverse drug reactions, n=1; and human parvovirus B19 infection complicated by T-LGLL, n=1. As an initial step in the STAT3 mutational analysis, we screened all patients with an AsPCR. Among the 42 patients with PRCA, 3 (10%) of 29 patients without T-LGLL and 6 (46%) of 13 patients with T-LGLL were positive for mutations. In contrast, none of the patients with AA, MDS or AA-PNH were positive (P value= 0.000031). Then, we examined MNC-derived DNA from 73 patients (PRCA, n=42 and AA, n=31) using amplicon sequencing. In this sequencing analysis, the median depth of coverage was 6,219x (range; 1,065-14,188). No STAT3 mutations were detected in 31 AA patients. In contrast, 15 (36%) PRCA patients possessed STAT3 mutations. The variant allele frequency of STAT3 mutations ranged from 0.0057 to 0.489. In all of the 7 patients studied, the STAT3 mutations were restricted to sorted CD8+ T cells. Three patients were negative for STAT3 mutations in MNCs but found to be positive when sorted CD8+ T cells were analyzed. The prevalence of STAT3 mutation in idiopathic, thymoma-associated, autoimmune disorder-associated and T-LGLL-associated PRCA was 33% (5/15), 29% (2/7), 20% (1/5), and 77% (10/13), respectively. In total, STAT3 mutations were detected in 8 of 29 (28%) PRCA patients without T-LGLL and 10 of 13 (77%) PRCA patients with T-LGLL. When TCRVβ repertoires of CD8+ T cells sorted from 3 STAT3 mutation(+) PRCA patients without T-LGLL were analyzed, skewed TCRVb repertoires were evident in all patients, and STAT3 mutations were detected in skewed TCRVβ fractions from 2 patients whose samples were available for cell sorting. The STAT3-mutation(+) patients were younger (median age of 63 years vs 73 years, P= 0.026) and less responsive to cyclosporine (CsA) (46% [6/13] vs 100% [8/8], P= 0.0092) in comparison to STAT3-mutation(-) patients. Of note, 4 of 8 STAT3 mutation(+) patients who had been refractory to CsA were treated with CY and all of them responded well, whereas none of 8 STAT3 mutation(-) patients required secondary treatment with CY owing to a sustained response to CsA. Discussion: This study is the first to reveal frequent STAT3 mutations in PRCA patients, even in thouse without T-LGLL, using a large cohort of patients. The presence of STAT3-mutated CD8+ T cells may be unique background of PRCA, irrespective of disease etiology. Poor response to CsA in STAT3 mutation(+) patients suggests that STAT3-mutated CD8+ T cells may be less sensitive to the inhibitory effects of CsA than non-mutated CD8+ T cells. In contrast, our analyses failed to detect STAT3 mutations in any of 52 AA patients, suggesting that STAT3 mutation(+) T cells had little impact on the development of AA in Japanese patients. Conclusion: STAT3 mutations are frequently detected in the CD8+ T cells of PRCA patients, regardless of the presence of T-LGLL. The identification of STAT3 mutations may be useful for appropriately managing patients with PRCA. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Nakao: Novartis: Honoraria; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (20) ◽  
pp. 2704-2712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toru Kawakami ◽  
Nodoka Sekiguchi ◽  
Jun Kobayashi ◽  
Tatsuya Imi ◽  
Kazuyuki Matsuda ◽  
...  

AbstractDysregulation of T-cell–mediated immunity is responsible for acquired pure red cell aplasia (PRCA). Although STAT3 mutations are frequently detected in patients with T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia (T-LGLL), which is often complicated by PRCA and which is also reported to be associated with acquired aplastic anemia (AA) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), whether STAT3-mutated T cells are involved in the pathophysiology of PRCA and other types of bone marrow failure remains unknown. We performed STAT3 mutation analyses of the peripheral blood mononuclear cells from PRCA patients (n = 42), AA (n = 54), AA–paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (AA-PNH; n = 7), and MDS (n = 21) using an allele-specific polymerase chain reaction and amplicon sequencing. STAT3 mutations were not detected in any of the 82 patients with AA/PNH/MDS but were detected in 43% of the 42 PRCA patients. In all 7 STAT3-mutation–positive patients who were studied, the STAT3 mutations were restricted to sorted CD8+ T cells. The prevalence of STAT3 mutation in idiopathic, thymoma-associated, autoimmune disorder–associated, and T-LGLL–associated PRCA was 33% (5 of 15), 29% (2 of 7), 20% (1 of 5), and 77% (10 of 13), respectively. The STAT3-mutation–positive patients were younger (median age, 63 vs 73 years; P= .026) and less responsive to cyclosporine (46% [6 of 13] vs 100% [8 of 8]; P= .0092) in comparison with STAT3-mutation–negative patients. The data suggest that STAT3-mutated CD8+ T cells may be closely involved in the selective inhibition of erythroid progenitors in PRCA patients.


Blood ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 594-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. B. S. MITCHELL ◽  
G. PINN ◽  
G. D. PEGRUM

Abstract A patient presented with pure red cell aplasia, which responded to corticosteroids. Thirteen months later, a malignant pleural effusion developed, with subsequent death from adenocarcinomatosis. The reports of cases in which pure red cell aplasia has been associated with carcinomata are reviewed. An autoimmune mechanism can be postulated in these circumstances, and the complete response to corticosteroids in the present case would support this hypothesis.


Anemia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pimjai Niparuck ◽  
Wasana Kanoksil ◽  
Pathawut Wacharapornin ◽  
Pichika Chantrathammachart ◽  
Sarinya Boongird

Background. Pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) is less common blood disorder; the causes and the treatments of PRCA are varied. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study during January 2010–December 2017, to explore the etiologies and to evaluate the response and treatment burden in adult patients with PRCA. Results. Of 32 PRCA patients, median age was 57 years (18–90 years). Median hemoglobin level and reticulocyte count at the time of diagnosis were 5.6 g/dL (3.3–7.3 g/dL) and 0.3% (0.1–0.7%), respectively. Median time to hematologic recovery was 12 weeks (3–72 weeks), and median number of red blood cell transfusion (RBC) was 20 units (4–100 units). Causes of PRCA were erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) (47%), parvovirus B19 infection (19%), thymoma (13%), zidovudine (6%), primary autoimmune PRCA (6%), Kaposi’s sarcoma (3%), systemic lupus erythematosus (3%), and ABO-mismatched stem cell transplantation (3%). Only 9 out of 24 treated patients achieved hematologic response within 8 weeks of treatment. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy provided 100% response rate in patients with parvovirus B19-associated PRCA and primary autoimmune PRCA. Low response rate was found in patients receiving immunosuppressants and chemotherapy for the treatment of ESA and thymoma-associated PRCA, respectively. Conclusions. Treatment outcome of PRCA depended upon the causes and the types of treatment, and the burden of RBC transfusion was very high in patients with ESA and thymoma-associated PRCA.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4970-4970
Author(s):  
J.E. Novoa ◽  
A.L. Rojo ◽  
B. Beñaran ◽  
R. Draper ◽  
H. Calvo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: fludarabine (F) has become the standard first line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in younger patients. Treatment of early stage patients with chlorambucil without risk stratification has not been shown to prolong survival. In recent years effective and potentially curative approaches such as nucleosides analogues, stem cell transplantation or monoclonal antibodies have been developed. The attraction of monoclonal antibodies is based on selective targeting of tumor - relevant surface markers and a distinct mechanism of action (antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity). Aims: to assess the efficacy, safety and quality of life of F in previously untreated B-cell CLL patients in a group of medical institutions in Uruguay during 11 years (1995–2006). Methods: 168 patients between the period 1995 – 2006 were evaluated.120 of them received F intravenous formulation (1995–2006) and 48 the oral one (2002–2006). Age: 48 – 85 years old, media 67 years old. Gender: male 90, female 78. Inclusion criteria for B-cell CLL was Binet stages B, C and A progressive (Ap), 18 to 85 years old, non multiorganic failure, performance status 0 – 2 (WHO), written informed consent. First condition was non previous treatment. Staging: Binet A 12/168, B 116/168 & C 40/168. Treatment: as first line therapy all the patients received (minimum): 6 cycles of i.v. Fludarabine (Fludara®, Schering) 25 mg/m2/daily (5 days) e/30 days or Oral Fludarabine, 40 mg/m2/daily (5 days), 6 cycles. Results: on this B-cell CLL cohort the overall response rate (ORR) was 78% (CR+PR), 80% of them have immunophenotypic response. Safety: on the 1100 cycles in 168 patients, the toxicity was: 1 AIHA, 2 pancytopenia, 3 plaquetopenia. Grade 3–4 infection rate was 1,3%. No alopecia was observed in any patient. Kaposi sarcoma (0,7%). Mortality rate: 1,7% (3/168 patients). Other adverse factors to overall survival were, age over 65 (p=0,0001) and hepatic impairment (p=0,0001). Toxicity: (WHO>2): granulocytopenia 28%, thrombocytopenia 8%, infection 2%. Although fludarabine-treated patients experienced more significant myelosuppression, no difference in the treatment group was demonstrated. Causes of death: Richter 12%, sepsis 5%, associated disease 34%, second malignancy 17% and others 30%. Comparing oral with intravenous formulation in overall survival the results were: CLL 34% vs 36% (p= NS). Conclusions: fludarabine monofosfate (Fludara®) looks like an effective and safe treatment for B-cell CLL. The oral and intravenous formulations have a similar response rate in elderly and young patients. The challenge remains to integrate new information to apply novel therapies in a disease-specific and risk-adapted maner. A longer follow up and a larger trial, might be needed to confirm these results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document