Can We Do Better? Identifying Orthopedic Surgery Patients at High Risk for Venous Thromboembolism Despite Thromboprophylaxis.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1782-1782
Author(s):  
Susan R. Kahn ◽  
Renee L. Schiff ◽  
Ian Shrier ◽  
Wahbi Hammouda ◽  
David Zukor

Abstract Background Routine administration of thromboprophylaxis is the standard of care for patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery due to the very high rate of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, because prophylaxis is not 100% effective, a significant proportion of patients who receive thromboprophylaxis develop post-operative VTE (“breakthrough VTE”). Clinical and surgical characteristics that are associated with the development of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients who receive standard thromboprophylaxis have not been well characterized. Objectives To evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for breakthrough VTE in patients who underwent major orthopedic surgery at a tertiary care hospital in Montreal, Canada. Methods Charts from consecutive patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or hip fracture surgery (HFS) (hip pinning or hemiarthroplasty) from August 1, 1999 to April 30, 2000 were abstracted using standardized case report forms. Data were collected on patient characteristics (including VTE risk factors and postoperative complications), surgical characteristics (including type of surgery, operative factors, type of anesthetic) and thromboprophylaxis regimen. The results of any tests performed for clinically suspected VTE were documented, and associations between potential risk factors and objectively confirmed VTE were examined. Results Over the 9 month study period, 310 patients underwent major orthopedic surgery (34% THA, 30% TKA, and 36% HFS) and received standard thromboprophylaxis with either dalteparin or enoxaparin (mean duration of prophylaxis: 7 days). Of 83 suspected VTE, 44 (7 proximal DVTs and 37 distal DVTs; 14% of study population; median onset 6 days post-op) were confirmed with objective testing (compression ultrasonography). Multivariate analyses showed that knee surgery (odds ratio [OR] 4.8, 95% confidence interval 2.3, 10.1) and type of low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin: protective) (OR 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.20, 0.80) independently predicted VTE. Patient characteristics such as previous VTE, malignancy, hormonal therapy or varicose veins were not associated with VTE. Conclusion Despite receiving standard thromboprophylaxis, 14% of patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery developed symptomatic breakthrough VTE. Factors that independently predicted VTE in our population were TKR surgery and type of low molecular weight heparin. Our results suggest that TKR patients may warrant more aggressive post-operative physiotherapy and ambulation and adjunctive prophylactic measures such as pneumatic compression. In addition, due to the heterogeneity of different low molecular weight heparin compounds, direct comparison of the effectiveness of enoxaparin with dalteparin for orthopedic prophylaxis in prospective, randomized trials seems warranted.

1996 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-157
Author(s):  
Paolo Prandoni ◽  
Samuel Z. Goldhaber ◽  
Andrea Piccioli ◽  
Antonio Girolami

Venous thromboembolism continues to be a major source of morbidity and mortality in both elective and traumatic orthopedic surgery. Prevention of this complication has received much attention in the orthope dic literature in recent years. We reviewed the relative efficacy and safety of various agents in the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism arising after major orthopedic surgery. In patients undergoing total hip replacement, low-molecular-weight heparin in fixed doses, adjusted doses of warfarin, and unfractionated heparin in adjusted doses are the most effective prophylactic agents and are highly recommended for routine use. Low-molecular- weight heparin or warfarin should be used in patients with hip fractures. Low-molecular-weight heparin, warfarin, or intermittent pneumatic compression should be used in patients undergoing major knee surgery. A number of questions still remain unanswered. In particular, further studies are needed to establish the optimal duration of prophylaxis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (01) ◽  
pp. 25-34
Author(s):  
Biljana Lazarova ◽  
Aleksandra Kapedanovska Nestorovska ◽  
Zoran Sterjev ◽  
Ljubica Suturkova

Clinical trials have shown Low-molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) to be at least as safe and efficacious as unfractionated heparin (UFH) for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery who are at highest risk of developing VTE. The retrospective study was conducted at orthopedic department in Clinical Hospital – Stip for period of 12 months (January-December 2013), where LMWHs and UFH are accepted thromboprophylaxis options. 320 patients (144 males and 157 females, medium age 58 years and 70 years, respectively) were hospitalized for various types of major orthopedic surgical interventions. 212 (66%) patients were admitted because of hip or knee fractures, 26 (8%) had conditions after hip or knee fractures and 82 (26%) were hospitalized for removal or implanting of osteosynthetic devices. After the surgical intervention, patients were subjected to anticoagulant prophylaxis (UFH or LMWHs). Which type of prophylaxis will be used depended exclusively on the surgeon’s decision. VTE complications resulting death were observed in 8 (2.5%) out of 13 patients. Death because of PE occurred in 2 (25%) out of 8 patients, compared to 6 (75%) patients who had fatal DVT complications. The average hospital cost for patients treated with LMWHs prophylaxis as first line thromboprophylaxis option was 52831.92 MKD/patient compared to 70082.24 MKD/patient for UFH first line thromboprophylaxis option. We observed that LMWHs thromboprophylaxis, applied in recommended doses subcutaneously once a day, is potentially more effective and cost saving option compared to UFH and should be considered as pharmacological treatment of first choice for the prevention of VTE (DVT and PE) in patients recovering from major orthopedic surgery at the orthopedic department in Clinical Hospital Stip. Keywords: Thromboprophylaxis, major orthopedic surgery, LMWHs, UFH


2011 ◽  
Vol 152 (21) ◽  
pp. 815-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Attila Pajor

Venous thromboembolism occurs approximately in 1 of 1000 pregnancies. It is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. Physiologic changes associated with pregnancy and delivery favor for developing venous thromboembolism, and there are individual risk factors, too, contributing to its manifestation. The most frequent risk factors of venous thromboembolism developing during pregnancy are the previous venous thromboembolism and the thrombophilias, furthermore, some other diseases and some unique complications of pregnancy and delivery. Beyond mechanical prevention only heparin preparations can be used for preventing and treating venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and among them the low-molecular-weight heparins are preferred for applying. Dosage of low-molecular-weight heparin preparations is determined by the type and strength of thrombophilia. For treatment of venous thromboembolism presented during pregnancy subcutaneous 100 IU/kg low-molecular-weight heparin is generally used at every 12 hours. Postpartum the oral anticoagulants can be safely applied, too. Orv. Hetil., 2011, 152, 815–821.


2003 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 402-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven B Deitelzweig ◽  
Gordon J Vanscoy ◽  
Cynthia S Niccolai ◽  
Thomas L Rihn

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the role of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in medical and orthopedic surgery patients. VTE prophylaxis trials in these practice settings establishing the current use of LMWHs marketed in the US are included. An overview is also provided of VTE incidence, risk factors, and prophylaxis consensus guidelines. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Clinical trials, review articles, and meta-analyses for Food and Drug Administration–approved LMWHs were identified from a MEDLINE search (1980–March 2002). Search terms included dalteparin, enoxaparin, internal medicine, low-molecular-weight heparin, orthopedic surgery, risk factors, tinzaparin, and venous thromboembolism. DATA SYNTHESIS: Consensus guidelines are useful as an initial guide to appropriate VTE prophylaxis; however, a review of the primary literature is needed to identify optimal agents, regimens, or interventions. LMWHs have demonstrated sound efficacy in VTE prevention; however, the quantity and quality of literature are not always comparable for the available agents. CONCLUSIONS: Enoxaparin has demonstrated efficacy and safety in VTE prevention in medical patients, whereas information is limited or lacking for dalteparin and tinzaparin. Total hip replacement (THR) trials have been conducted with all US-marketed LMWHs and have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of each agent. Trials specifically establishing the efficacy of an LMWH in total knee replacement surgery (TKR) have been published for enoxaparin. One combination THR and TKR trial has been published for tinzaparin. These trial outcomes have positioned the LMWHs as key alternatives to adjusted-dose warfarin for VTE prophylaxis in orthopedic surgery. Inherent differences between LMWHs prevent the extrapolation of clinical outcomes from 1 trial to another.


2002 ◽  
Vol 96 (Sup 2) ◽  
pp. A461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. Zufferey ◽  
Sylvie Laporte ◽  
Serge Molliex ◽  
Christian Auboyer ◽  
Patrick Mismetti

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document