IV Busulfan (Bu) with Fludarabine (Flu) or Cyclophosphamide (Cy) - Comparing Ablative Conditioning Regimens for Allogeneic Transplantation in AML/MDS.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 97-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos de Lima ◽  
Daniel Couriel ◽  
Munir Shahjahan ◽  
Jorge Alamo ◽  
Peter F. Thall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Day Treatment ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Conditioning Therapy ◽  
One Year ◽  
Reduced Toxicity

Abstract As part of our evaluation of Flu as immunosuppressive (and DNA damage repair inhibiting) agent, and as an alternative to Cy in combination with IV Bu, preparing AML/MDS patients for allogeneic transplant (AlloSCT), we postulated that the IV Bu-Flu regimen would yield improved safety, yet increased antileukemic efficacy. We now compared two consecutive series of patients receiving pretransplant conditioning therapy with either IV Bu-Flu or IV BuCy2. Methods: Flu 40 mg/m2 IV was given once daily, each dose followed immediately by Bu 130 mg/m2 IV over 3 hr (days −6 till −3) (n=128 patients), and in the IV BuCy2 the Bu was given at 0.8 mg/kg over 2 hr every 6 hr for 16 doses (days −7 till −4), followed by Cy 60 mg/kg on days −3 and −2 (n=73 patients). Patients with an unrelated (MUD) or mismatched donor received ATG on days −3 to −1. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was based on tacrolimus and mini-methotrexate. Patients: Median age was 46 (19–66) (IV Bu-Flu group) and 39 (13–64) (IV BuCy2 group) years, respectively. At transplant 45% and 46% patients were in CR1–3, the remainder had active disease. Cytogenetic risk categories were equivalent for the two groups, with poor or intermediate risk in 88 % in the IV Bu-Flu, and in 82 % of the BuCy2group. Donors were HLA-identical siblings (SIBS) in 53 %, and 73%, MUDs in 39% and 15 %, others in 8 % and 12% respectively. Median follow-up for patients still alive (August 2004) was 15 mos (3–37; n=78) for the IV Bu-Flu group, and 45 mos (24–76; n=27)) for the IV BuCy2 patients. Results: Both regimens were well tolerated; 100-day treatment-related mortality (TRM) was for SIB/MUD 2.7 / 2% after IV Bu-Flu, and 7 / 9% in the IV BuCy2 group, respectively. Overall, one-year TRM was for 7% after IV Bu-Flu and 18% after IV BuCy2. The overall aGvHD rates were 42% and 45%. 2-year overall survival (OS) were 50% for the IV Bu-Flu group, 42% after IV BuCy2. For patients transplanted in CR the 2-yr OS and event-free survival were 69% and 68 % after IV Bu-Flu, and 48% and 41% in the IV BuCy2. We conclude, that IV Bu-Flu is a safe and highly effective, reduced toxicity myeloablative conditioning regimen for AML/MDS. Its antileukemic efficacy appears to be at least equal to what is experienced with the IV BuCy2 regimen. Thus, our data demonstrate the IV Bu-Flu regimen to be a new standard for myeloablative conditioning therapy for alloSCT in AML/MDS. Figure Figure

scholarly journals Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen of Reduced Toxicity Is Associated with Favorable Survival in Patients with Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 21-22
Author(s):  
Eleni Gavriilaki ◽  
Chrysavgi Lalayanni ◽  
Ioanna Sakellari ◽  
Christos Varelas ◽  
Despina Mallouri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Comorbidity Index ◽  
Reduced Toxicity ◽  
Reduced Intensity

Background: Secondary or treatment-related acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) is associated with poor outcomes. Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is the treatment of choice, patient eligibility criteria and optimal conditioning regimen remain under study. We have previously shown an advantage of a myeloablative conditioning regimen with reduced toxicity (Fludarabine 150mg/m2, Treosulfan 42g/m2, FluTreo) compared to a reduced intensity regimen. However, the long-term effects of this regimen remain unknown, especially in comparison to patients not receiving alloHCT. Aims: We hypothesized that patients transplanted with FluTreo would have a long-term survival advantage over other treatment alternatives. Methods: We retrospectively studied consecutive patients treated for sAML in our center over the last two decades (1998-2018). Exclusion criteria were: age>70 years, ECOG performance status≥3 at presentation, induction regimens≤2, and autologous or haploidentical HCT because these were performed in individual patients. Since 2013, we have introduced FluTreo for patients with a suitable donor that would have been previously eligible only for reduced intensity conditioning/RIC. The following factors were studied in the whole cohort: age, type of disease (treatment-related or post myelodysplastic syndrome/MDS), previous intensive chemotherapy cycles, cytogenetic risk, overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). In transplant recipients, we also recorded HCT-comorbidity index/CI score, cumulative incidence (CI) of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and treatment-related mortality (TRM). Follow-up was calculated from diagnosis in the whole cohort; and from date of transplant in the sub-group analysis of transplant recipients. Results: We studied 19 FluTreo recipients compared to 46 recipients of other conditioning regimens (38 myeloablative and 8 RIC), and 52 patients treated only with chemotherapy. Complete remission (CR) had been achieved in all FluTreo recipients before HCT, compared to 53% of other transplants, and 44% of chemotherapy only patients (p<0.001). As expected, median age was increased in FluTreo and chemotherapy only patients (59 and 58 years respectively), compared to other transplants (48 years, p<0.001). There was no other difference in baseline characteristics. With a median follow-up of 43 (range 13-204) months in surviving patients, 4-year OS was 40.3% in FluTreo versus 31.3% in other transplants and 11.8% in chemotherapy only patients (p<0.001, Figure 1A). In the multivariate analysis, achieving CR (p<0.001) and the FluTreo group (p<0.001) were associated with favorable OS, independently of age and cytogenetic risk. 4-year DFS was 32.3% in FluTreo, versus 29.3% in other transplants and 10.2% in chemotherapy only patients (p=0.001, Figure 1B). Within transplanted patients, there was no significant difference in GVHD, relapse and TRM between FluTreo and other transplants. Within the FluTreo group, acceptable rates of CI in severe acute and extensive chronic GVHD were observed (15.2% and 18.4%, respectively). Similarly, 4-year CI of TRM reached 30.4%, despite a median HCT-CI of 3 (0-7), age of 59 (51-67) years, 4 lines of treatment (3-6), and a majority of matched unrelated donors (13/19). Conclusion: Our real-world study confirms that alloHCT with FluTreo expands the transplant population with similar safety and efficacy to previous transplant modalities in sAML patients. Achievement of CR remains a major predictor of OS in these patients. The choice of alloHCT in this unique patient population of a rather older age and comorbidity index needs to be revisited. Figure 1 Disclosures Gavriilaki: Omeros Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

Fludarabine Based Conditioning for Allogeneic Transplantation in Severe Aplastic Anemia.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2029-2029
Author(s):  
Mammen Chandy ◽  
Biju George ◽  
Auro Viswabandya ◽  
Vikram Mathews ◽  
Ashish Bajel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Aplastic Anemia ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
Severe Aplastic Anemia ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cells ◽  
Allogeneic Bmt ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Blood Stem Cells

Abstract Patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) who are multiply transfused or septic have a poor outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Forty three patients (31 males and 12 females) with SAA underwent allogeneic BMT using a fludarabine based conditioning regimen between 1998 and 2005. The median age was 20 years (range: 4–38) with 11 children and 32 adults. All donors were 6 antigen matched HLA identical sibling or family donors. Co morbidities seen included bacterial sepsis in 15 patients, fungal pneumonia in 4 and a recent intracranial bleed in 5 patients. Seven patients had failed Antithymocyte or antilymphocyte globulin (ATG/ALG) and two patients had failed their first transplant. The median time from diagnosis to transplant was 12 months (range: 2 – 96) and the median transfusions prior to BMT was 28 (range: 2 – 380). Conditioning therapy consisted of: Fludarabine (Flu) 180 mg/m2 over 6d + Busulfan (Bu) 8 mg/kg over 2d + ATG 40 mg/kg/day over 4 d in 17 patients, Flu 180 mg/m2 over 6d + Cyclophosphamide (Cy) 120 mg/kg over 2d ± ATG 40 mg/kg/day over 4d in 17 patients, Flu/TBI/OKT3 in 4, and Cy 120 + Flu 150mg/m2 in 5 patients. Graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of Cyclosporine and mini methotrexate. Graft source was peripheral blood stem cells in 39 patients and G-CSF stimulated bone marrow in 4. The median cell dose was 5.2 x 108 MNC/kg (range: 2.1 – 13.6) for PBSC and 5.2 x 108 TNC/kg (range: 3.7 – 6.8) for bone marrow. Five patients expired within the first 10 days due to sepsis. Thirty seven patients engrafted with a mean time to ANC > 500 of 11.6 days (range: 8 – 18) and median platelet engraftment time of 13 days (range: 8 – 32). One patient had primary graft failure and expired on day 64 due to fungal pneumonia despite a second transplant. Acute GVHD was seen in 14 patients (38%) with Grade III–IV GVHD in 4 (10.5%). Chronic GVHD was seen in 10 patients with 6 having limited and 4 with extensive GVHD. Two patients had secondary graft rejection on day + 24 and +60 respectively and expired due to fungal pneumonia. At a median follow up of 17 months (range: 5 – 78); 29 patients (67.7%) are alive and well. Among patients treated with Flu/Bu/ATG, 12/17 (70.5%) are alive and well while the DFS is 82% (14/17) in patients treated with Flu/Cy ± ATG. Comparison with patients conditioned with Cy/ATG during 1990–2004 is given in the table. This comparison suggests that a fludarabine based conditioning regimen may be better, with less rejection, than Cy/ATG for allogeneic BMT in sick patients with SAA who are infected and multiply transfused at the time of BMT. Comparative data Fludarabine Cy/ATG Number 43 26 Rejection 3 (7%) 7 (27%) DFS 29(67.7%) 11 (46%)

The Role of Alemtuzumab Compared to Antitymocyte Globulin in Non-Myeloablative Stem Cell Transplantation; Especially for the Prevention of GVHD and Immune Recovery.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2739-2739
Author(s):  
In Hae Park ◽  
June-Won Cheong ◽  
Jee Young Lee ◽  
Jin Seok Kim ◽  
Hyun Ju Chun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Nk Cell ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Immune Recovery ◽  
Cell Recovery ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Alemtuzumab is an anti-CD52 antibody, and has been used for lymphoid malignancies or as a member of non-myeloablative conditioning regimen in allogeneic transplantation. Especially, in non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST), it has been reported that alemtuzumab is effective for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), but the immune reconstruction after transplantation is delayed. In this study, we comparatively evaluated the efficacy of alemtuzumab for non-myeloablative conditioning, GVHD prophylaxis, and immune recovery in NST for hematologic diseases. We have compared the results in 28 recipients of a sibling or unrelated NST enrolled. The recipients were divided into 2 groups according to the use of alemtuzumab. In group A (n=21), the conditioning regimen was a combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide (or busulfan) and antithymocyte globulin (ATG), and group B (n=7) received fludarabine, cyclophosphamide (or busulfan), and alemtuzumab instead of ATG. GVHD prophylaxis was by cyclosporin A or FK506 plus methotrexate. There were no significant differences in the graft engraftment and period of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor infusion. Patients receiving alemtuzumab had a significantly lower incidence of acute GVHD (stage 2 or more) (14.3% versus 38.1%, P=0.03) and chronic GVHD (14.3% versus 52.4%, P=0.005). The relapse rate after transplantation was 28.6% (6 patients) in group A and 14.3 (1 patients) in group B (P=0.04). Flow cytometric analysis of peripheral mononuclear cells for evaluation of immune recovery showed that T-cell and NK-cell recovery were delayed in both groups. However, T-cell and NK-cell recovery after transplantation occurred earlier in patients received alemtuzumab. No significant differences were observed in disease-free or overall survival between two groups. In conclusion, alemtuzumab can be recommended for immune suppression in NST, with successful control over acute/chronic GVHD and inducing relatively earlier immune recovery after transplantation.

Treosulfan-Based Reduced Toxicity Regimen Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Non-Malignant Disorders.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5245-5245
Author(s):  
Jerzy Wojnar ◽  
Sebastian Giebel ◽  
Miroslaw Markiewicz ◽  
Malgorzata Krawczyk-Kulis ◽  
Iwona Wylezol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Haemorrhagic Cystitis ◽  
Hematopoietic Disorders ◽  
One Year ◽  
Reduced Toxicity

Abstract Graft rejection is a major cause of failure after alloHCT in non-malignant hematopoietic disorders including severe aplastic anemia (SAA) and paroxysmal nocturnal hemaoglobinuria (PNH). For patients with high risk of this complication we introduced a novel conditioning regimens, based on treosulfan - an alkylating agent possesing both immuno- and myeloablative properties. Between 2003–2006, eleven patients (age: 23(14–35) years) with SAA (n=6) or PNH (n=5) were treated in a single institution with alloHSCT from either HLA-identical sibling (n=3) or an unrelated volunteer (n=8). For patients with SAA conditioning regimen consisted of treosulfan 10 g/m2/d on days -7, -6, cyclophosphamide 40 mg/kg/d on d. -5, -4, -3, -2, and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) 2 mg/kg/d on d. -3, -2, -1. PNH patients received treosulfan 14 g/m2/d on days -6, -5, -4, fludarabine 30 g/m2 on d. -6, -5, -4, -3, -2, and (ATG) 2 mg/kg/d on d. -3, -2, -1. Bone marrow was used as a source of stem cells in 5 patients and peripheral blood - in 6 cases. Graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of Cyclosporin A and short-course Methotrexate. All patients engrafted with the median time to neutrophil >0.5×10e9/L and platelet >50×10e9/L recovery of 16 (14–22) days and 21.5 (12–29) days, respectively. Complete donor chimerism was achieved on day +30 in all cases. None of the patients developed grade III-IV acute GVHD, two patients experienced grade II acute GVHD. At one year the cumulative incidence of extensive chronic GVHD equaled 22%. No severe organ toxicity was observed. With the median follow-up of 19 months, the disease-free survival at 2.5 years was 91%. A single PNH patient died of haemorrhagic cystitis. We conclude that treosulfan-based preparative regimens are well-tolerated and allow stable engraftment in SAA and PNH patients. The use of treosulfan allows intensification of the conditioning without providing an additional non-hematological toxicity.

Busulfan Dosing May Affect Survival Following Reduced Intensity Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myelogeneous Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4328-4328
Author(s):  
Karen K Ballen ◽  
Steven L McAfee ◽  
Bimalangshu R Dey ◽  
Christine Dube ◽  
Eyal C Attar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Total Dose ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Acute Myelogeneous Leukemia ◽  
Reduced Intensity

Abstract Abstract 4328 The prognosis for patients with acute myelogeneous leukemia over age 60 is poor, with a 5 year survival of less than 10%. Reduced intensity allogeneic transplantation has been employed in an attempt to improve survival. We report 23 patients who received reduced intensity allogeneic transplantation after a conditioning regimen of busulfan and fludarabine. Fifteen patients received a transplant from a matched sibling donor,1 patient from a 5/6 matched child and 7 patients from a fully matched (10/10) unrelated donor. We treated 10 patients with the reduced intensity conditioning regimen of busulfan IV 0.8 mg/kg daily Days -6, -5, -4, -3 (total dose 3.2 mg/kg) and fludarabine IV 30 mg/m2 Days -6,-5, -4, -3 (total dose 120mg/kg). After November, 2007, 10 patients were treated with twice daily busulfan IV 0.8mg/kg (total dose 6.4 mg/kg) with the same dose of fludarabine. Three patients were treated on a national protocol in which the same dose of busulfan (6. 4 mg/kg) was administered but given at 0.8 mg/kg four times daily for 2 days on Days -4 and -3 with fludarabine. GVHD prophylaxis was cyclosporine or tacrolimus with either cellcept or (after July, 2008) methotrexate. Seven recipients of unrelated donor or mismatched transplants also received rabbit antithymocyte globulin 1.5 mg/kg Days -3, -2, -1 (total dose 4.5 mg/kg) as part of their GVHD prophylaxis. Median age was 65 years (range 46-70 years). Fourteen patients were in 1st complete remission, 8 were in 2nd complete remission, and one patient had active disease at the time of transplant. Two patients had received a prior autologous stem cell transplant and 2 patients had received a prior allogeneic transplant. The median days to neutrophil (ANC >500) and platelet engraftment (plt >20K) were 15 and 14 respectively. The median length of stay was 25 days (range 13-40 days). Median follow-up was 12 months among the 10 patients still alive. The incidence of acute GVHD Grades II-IV and chronic GVHD were 44% and 35% respectively. Transplant related (non relapse) mortality at 100 days and at 6 months was 0. The overall non-relapse mortality was 4%. Relapse rate was 67% in the daily busulfan group and 46% in the higher dose busulfan group. The one-year overall and disease-free survivals for all patients were 44% and 25% respectively. Causes of death were relapse in 12 patients and in one patient sepsis six years after transplant. In multivariate analysis, disease status, age, and GVHD did not predict for survival, perhaps due to the small sample size. There was a trend to improved survival in the higher dose busulfan group but the follow up was shorter for these patients. In summary, 1) Reduced intensity transplantation is tolerated well in an older population with acute myelogeneous leukemia, with no transplant related mortality at Day 100 or at 6 months post transplant; 2) Relapse rermains the most common cause of death; 3) There was a trend to improved survival with a twice daily busulfan dosing. Future studies will address the outcomes of twice daily busulfan dosing in a larger cohort of older patients with AML in complete remission. Disclosures: Spitzer: Genzyme: Consultancy.

Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation: Comparison After Single Unit Cord Blood Intrabone Injection and Double Unit Cord Blood Transplantation In Patients with Hematological Malignant Disorders. A Eurocord-EBMT Analysis

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 223-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanderson Rocha ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Annalisa Ruggeri ◽  
Marina Podestà ◽  
Dolores Caballero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cord Blood ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Cord Blood Transplantation ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Blood Transplantation ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 223 The use of single cord blood unit for transplantation in adult patients is limited due to the high risk of graft failure and delayed neutrophil and platelet recoveries. The limited hematopoietic progenitors in UCB grafts and their homing after IV injection, have prompted investigators to study the design of delivering CB grafts directly into the bone marrow (BM) space (IBCBT) or to use double cord blood transplantation (dUCBT) to improve engraftment. To evaluate the impact of IBCBT, we made a retrospective based registry comparison with dUCBT performed in the same time period (2006-2010) and reported to Eurocord-EBMT. We included 87 and 149 patients who received either IBCBT or dUCBT, respectively, after a myeloablative conditioning regimen for malignant disorders. IBCBT was performed in 8 EBMT centers whereas dUCBT was performed in 56 EBMT centers. Majority of patients in both groups had acute leukemia. IBCBT patients were older (p<0.001), more frequently received an autologous graft (p<0.001) and had positive CMV serology (p<0.001), and importantly had more advanced disease at transplantation (p=0.04). Median number of infused (after thawing) nucleated cells injected intrabone was 2.5×107/kg and it was 3.9×107/kg in dUCBT (p<0.001). In 72% of both groups, CB grafts were HLA 4/6 (the highest HLA disparity was taken into consideration in dUCBT). Other differences were regarding GVHD prophylaxis that was based on CSA+MMF in 100% of IBCBT and in 62% of dUCBT cases; ATG was used in all IBCBT and 40% of dUCBT. Median follow-up time was 18 months in IBCBT and 17 months in dUCBT. At day 30, cumulative incidence (CI) of neutrophil recovery (ANC >500) was 83% after IBCBT and 63% after dUCBT, and at day 60, it was 90% in both groups; the median time to reach ANC>500 was 23 and 28 days after IBCBT and after dUCBT (p=0.001) respectively. At Day-180 CI of platelets recovery was 81% after IBCBT and 65% after dUCBT (p<0.001) with a median time of 36 days and 49 respectively (p=0.002). At day 100, CI of acute GVHD (II-IV) was 19% and 47% (p<0.001) and chronic GVHD 34% and 37% respectively (p=NS) respectively. Unadjusted 2 years-CI of NRM and RI were 31% and 23% after IBCBT and 35% and 28% after dUCBT, respectively (p=NS). Unadjusted 2 y-DFS estimation was 47% after IBCBT and 37% after dUCBT (p=NS). In multivariate analysis adjusting for statistical differences between 2 groups (such as status of the disease at transplant, age, CMV, previous transplants, GVHD prophylaxis), recipients of IBCBT had improved DFS (HR: 1.64, p=0.035), faster platelet recovery (HR:2.13, p<0.001) and decreased acute GVHD (HR:0.31; p<0.001) compared to dUCBT recipients. We did not find a cut-off value of number of nucleated cells after IBCBT or dUCBT that could be associated with outcomes after both approaches. In conclusion, both strategies have extended the use of CB transplants to adults in need of cord blood transplantation. Therefore, IBCBT is an option to transplant adult patients with single CB units after myeloablative conditioning regimen and may impact the total costs of cord blood transplantation. Based on these results, intra-bone technique may disclose new transplant potentialities also with other HSC sources. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Phase I/I Clinical Trial for the Evaluation of Bortezomib within the Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen (RIC) and Post-Allogeneic Transplantation As Gvhd Prophylaxis Among High-Risk Myeloma Patients. EudraCT: 2005–004858-27

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3025-3025
Author(s):  
Jose Antonio Perez-Simón ◽  
Teresa Caballero-Velazquez ◽  
Cristina Encinas ◽  
Cristina Castilla-Llorente ◽  
Rodrigo Martino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Reduced Intensity

Abstract Abstract 3025 Introduction: Although allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the only curative treatment for MM, it is associated to a high morbility and mortality. Moreover, relapses are common after allo-RIC. Accordingly, new strategies are required to reduce both the risk of relapse and the toxicity of the procedure. As we have previously demonstrated, Bz induces a selective depletion of alloreactive T-cells and has immunomodulatory properties which might be of potential benefit for GVHD control. The primary end point of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of allo-RIC in terms of response when Bz was added as part of a reduced intensity conditioning prior to allo-SCT. Secondary end points included incidence of GVHD and analysis of the toxicity of the procedure when Bz is also administered post-infussion as part of the GVHD prophylaxis. Method: Prior to allo-RIC, patients received two cycles of Bz plus dexamethasone. Conditioning consisted of fludarabine (30 mg/m2 intravenously on days -9 to -5) and melphalan (70 mg/m2 intravenously on days -4, -3) plus Bz 1, 3mg/m2 on day - 11 and -2. GVHD prophylaxis included cyclosporine (CsA) and methotrexate for the first 9 patients and CsA plus MTX and Bz on days +3 and +7 for the remaining 7 patients. From day +50 post allo-RIC 7 cycles of Bz (+1, +8, +15) were administered, the first two cycles every 28 days and the rest every 56. Results: 16 patients from the Twenty-one initially enrolled, were evaluable. All 16 patients had received at least 2 lines of therapy including autologous-SCT. Disease status was CR or nCR in 4 patients, 9 had PR and the remaining 3 patients had relapsed / progressive disease. 15 patients maintained or improved status at transplant including all × patients with active disease at transplant. Eight patients (50%) relapsed, four with extramedullary involvement. No patient developed grade 4 aGVHD.Grades 2–3 aGVHD occurred in 6 patients (37%). Interestingly, two out of the nine (29%) patients who received Bz on days +3 and 7 developed grades 2–3 acute GVHD as compared to four of the nine (44%) who did not receive it. In terms of toxicity, one patient did not achieve platelet engraftment and 2 patients developed peripheral neuropathy requiring treatment withdrawal. 8 patients died, four of them due to relapse (MRT: 25%). With a median follow-up of 457 days overall survival was 46%. Conclusions: The current trial is the first evaluating the efficacy and safety of Bz as part of a reduced intensity conditioning regimen among patients with high risk MM undergoing allogeneic transplantation. Regarding the efficacy of the procedure all but one patient improved disease status post-alloRIC although relapse rate was still high in this heavily pretreated population. In addition, Bz post-alloSCT is well tolerated and may decrease the incidence of GVHD. Disclosures: Perez-Simón: Janssen-Cilag: Patents & Royalties. Off Label Use: This study evaluates the efficacy of Bortezomib as part of a reduced intensity conditioning regimen among patients with high risk MM undergoing allogeneic transplantation. Rosiñol:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. San Miguel:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Partially Matched, Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Transplantation: Clinical Outcomes and Immune Reconstitution

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 690-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Rizzieri ◽  
Liang Piu Koh ◽  
Gwynn D. Long ◽  
Cristina Gasparetto ◽  
Keith M. Sullivan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Immune Recovery ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Severe Infections ◽  
Related Donor ◽  
Standard Risk

Purpose Allogeneic transplantation is typically limited to younger patients having a matched donor. To allow a donor to be found for nearly all patients, we have used a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen in conjunction with stem cells from a related donor with one fully mismatched HLA haplotype. Patients and Methods Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and alemtuzumab were used as the preparatory regimen. Additional graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis included mycophenolate with or without cyclosporine. Patients with persistence of disease had a donor lymphocyte boost planned. Toxicities, engraftment, response, survival, and immune recovery are reported. Results Forty-nine patients with hematologic malignancies or marrow failure and no other available donors were enrolled. Ninety-four percent of patients had successful engraftment, and 8% had secondary graft failure. The treatment-related mortality rate was 10.2%, and 8% of patients had severe GVHD. Encouraging evidence of quantitative lymphocyte recovery through expansion of transplanted T cells was noted by 3 to 6 months. Seventy-five percent of patients attained a complete remission, and 1-year survival rate was 31% (95% CI, 18% to 44%). A standard-risk group of 19 patients with aplasia or in remission at transplantation demonstrated a 63% 1-year survival rate (95% CI, 38% to 80%) and 2.9-year median overall survival time (95% CI, 6.2 to 48 months). Conclusion Nonmyeloablative therapy using haploidentical family member donors is feasible because the main obstacles of GVHD and graft rejection are manageable, allowing readily available stem-cell donors to be found for nearly all patients. Further qualitative and quantitative improvement in immune recovery is needed to address the high rate of relapse and risk of severe infections.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document