Novel Single Agents with Combined Anti-Coagulant and Anti-Platelet Activities: Potential Treatment Option for the Management of HIT.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1884-1884
Author(s):  
Jeanine M. Walenga ◽  
Margaret Prechel ◽  
Walter P. Jeske ◽  
Meredith K. McDonald ◽  
James M. Daikur ◽  
...  

Abstract A recently introduced series of antithrombotic agents brings the novel characteristic of dual anti-coagulant and anti-platelet actions in one molecule. These low molecular weight, synthetic, serine protease inhibitors, depending on structural modifications, have variable ratios of both anti-thrombin and anti-platelet activities. Studies have shown that these agents produce stronger antithrombotic actions relative to single targeted therapeutic agents (O. Iqbal #P0521 and D. Hoppensteadt #OR335, ISTH meeting Sydney, Australia August 2005). Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse effect of heparin in which both thrombin generation and platelet activation augment hypercoagulable and inflammatory states leading to a high probability of developing severe thrombosis. Current guidelines for patients who have HIT recommend the use of a direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) to prevent or treat associated thrombosis. Clinical trial data, as well as practice outcomes, show that DTI treatment alone is not sufficient to overcome the pathology and resultant thrombosis in all HIT patients. Thus, more optimal treatment options are needed. A focus of treatment on inhibiting both platelet and coagulation activation is logical based on the pathophysiology of HIT. This study was undertaken to determine if the novel CanAm series of agents may have a role in the management of patients with HIT. Eight agents (MC45301, MC45308, CA207, CA216, CA234, CA247, CA250, CA254) with varying ratios of anticoagulant/anti-platelet activities were studied using the 14C-serotonin release assay (SRA) and flow cytometry for the detection of platelet P-selectin expression and platelet microparticle generation. The DTI argatroban, the FXa inhibitor fondaparinux, and the platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonist eptifibatide were included for comparison. Both cross-reactivity to HIT antibodies and amelioration of HIT antibody-induced platelet activation were assessed. In the absence of heparin, at 1-100 μg/ml none of the CanAm agents caused platelet activation in the presence of serum from patients with HIT (n=12) ruling out cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies. None of the comparator drugs showed cross reactivity with HIT antibodies. In the presence of heparin (0.1 U/ml) and serum from patients with HIT (n=12), the CanAm agents were able to inhibit all platelet activation responses at concentrations of 10–100 μg/ml. In comparison, the DTI and FXa inhibitor were not able to inhibit the HIT antibody/heparin induced platelet activation with any HIT serum. The GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor, however, showed a concentration-dependent inhibition of the platelet activities with complete blockade at 1 μg/ml, suggesting the importance of platelet activation inhibition for the treatment of HIT. Thus, compared to mono-therapeutic agents such as DTIs and fondaparinux, the dual-acting CanAm agents not only lack cross reactivity with HIT antibodies, but they have the added ability to block the antibody-induced platelet activation that occurs during an acute episode of HIT. A dual-acting anticoagulant/anti-platelet drug may, therefore, be of more value than single targeted anti-thrombin drugs for the management of HIT and associated thrombosis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-126
Author(s):  
Zahraa Qusairy ◽  
Miran Rada

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has appeared to be one of the biggest global health threats worldwide with no specific therapeutic agents. As of August 2020, over 22.4 million confirmed cases and more than 788,000 deaths have been reported globally, and the toll is expected to increase before the pandemic is over. Given the aggressive nature of their underlying disease, cancer patients seem to be more vulnerable to COVID-19 and various studies have confirmed this hypothesis. Herein, we review the current information regarding the role of cancer in SARS-CoV-2 infections. Moreover, we discuss the effective supportive treatment options for COVID-19 including Dexamethasone, Tocilizumab and Remdesivir and convalescent plasma therapy (CPT), as well as discuss their efficacy in COVID-19 patients with cancer.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3029-3029
Author(s):  
Margaret Prechel ◽  
Walter P. Jeske ◽  
Meredith K. McDonald ◽  
Amanda F. Drenth ◽  
Jeanine M. Walenga

Abstract Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) represents a disease spectrum triggered by an immune response to heparin. The most dramatic clinical expression of HIT is HIT antibody-driven thrombosis. Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are a promising new class of drugs for treatment of the acute phase of HIT; however, they have a narrow safety/efficacy window (high bleeding risk) and morbidity/mortality have not been eliminated. In addition, the high probability of developing thrombosis in HIT combined with extreme mortality, has led to a bias for prophylactic treatment. Thus, there remains a clinical need to identify optimal treatment options for patients with HIT. A new concept is to use an agent that can effectively compete with heparin in a manner that prevents the HIT antibody from inducing platelet activation, i.e., amelioration. We evaluated a 2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin (ParinGenix, Inc.; Tucson, AZ) to determine its ability to ameliorate HIT antibody/heparin induced platelet activation. The test agent was added to a mixture of known-reactive platelets and pre-formed immune complexes (heparin, PF4, HIT antibodies), and SRA and flow cytometry were performed. Due to the inherent biological variability of HIT antibodies, sera from four different patients (clinically diagnosed as HIT; SRA positive) were used. Two concentrations of heparin which reflect typical prevention (0.1 U/ml) and treatment (0.5 U/ml) clinical doses were used. The 2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin produced an amelioration of HIT antibody/heparin induced platelet activation as demonstrated in the SRA by inhibition of 14C serotonin release from activated platelets, and in flow cytometric analysis by inhibition of platelet microparticle formation and platelet cell surface P-selectin expression. Significant amelioration activity was initiated at 6.25 μg/ml 2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin and complete inhibition of the induced platelet activation (equal to the 100 U/ml heparin HIT assay ‘no response’) was achieved with 50 μg/ml of the agent. Since this new treatment approach blocks platelet activation caused by HIT antibody/heparin (not a characteristic of DTIs), we propose that a non-anticoagulant glycosaminoglycan (GAG) may be useful in improving the clinical management of patients with HIT. The concept of amelioration differs from all previous options for the clinical management of patients with HIT including the use of danaparoid, fondaparinux, DTIs and other drugs that target thrombin/thrombin generation inhibition. Although not directed at platelet activation inhibition, this type of GAG effects an inhibition of HIT antibody mediated platelet activation, which is the source of the pathophysiology of HIT. The data of this study suggest that this 2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin may be effective as either an adjunct or sole treatment of an ongoing HIT pathology, or as a preventive measure in patients who will be exposed to heparin.


1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
M A Selak ◽  
M Chignard ◽  
J B Smith

Communication between neutrophils and platelets was previously investigated by measuring platelet aggregation, serotonin release and changes in cytosolic free calcium subsequent to specific stimulation of neutrophils by fMet-Leu-Phe (FMLP) in a suspension of both cell types. The addition of the chemotactic peptide was shown to elicit secondary platelet activation as a consequence of primary stimulation of neutrophils. Cell-free supernatants from FMLP-stimulated neutrophils were capable of inducing platelet activation thus demonstrating that a factor released bv neutrophils was responsible for the observed platelet responses. After eliminating classical platelet agonists as the acitive agent, it was shown that an enzyme termed neutroohilin induced platelet calcium mobilization, secretion and aggregation. The current studies were conducted to characterize the mediator released bv neutrophils. Neutrophilin bound bo cation exchange resins but failed to bind to anion exchangers. The biological activity associated with neutroohilin was unaffected by leupeptin, only very weakly diminished by N-bosyl-Lvs-chloromethvl ketone and was strongly inhibited by N-tosvl-Phe-chloromethvl ketone, aloha-l-antitrvpsin, soybean trypsin inhibitor and Z-Glv-Leu-Phe-chloromethvl ketone. Neutroohilin was released from stimulated neutrophils only after cytochalasin B treatment, as was beta-glucuronidase, suggesting that both enzymes are located in azurophilic granules. Neutroohilin-induced platelet activation was inhibited bv antiserum to human catheosin G in a dose-deoendent manner but was unaffected by antiserum to human elastase or alpha-fetoprotein. The inhibitor sensitivity, immunological cross-reactivity, ionic properties and probable subcellular localization indicate that neutrophilin is a cationic chymotrvosin-like enzyme related, if not identical to, catheosin G. Neutroohilin-induced platelet activation could explain different pathological events in which platelets and neutroohils are known to be involved.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3429-3429
Author(s):  
Margaret Prechel ◽  
Abigail M Hilby ◽  
Jeanine M. Walenga

Abstract Background: Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by polyclonal antibodies, formed to conformational neoepitopes exposed in platelet factor 4 (PF4) bound to heparin (H). HIT antibodies are commonly measured by one of several commercially available ELISAs. The literature reports cases of clinical HIT and/or positive HIT antibody-mediated platelet activation tests in patients without antibodies detectable in PF4 based ELISAs, and suggests that antibodies to other chemokines, such as interleukin-8 (IL-8), may be involved. The current study was undertaken to characterize the frequency of such antibodies in a population of consecutive serum specimens submitted for HIT diagnosis by 14C-serotonin release assay (SRA), and also in a group of retrospectively selected SRA-positive specimens. Methods: Specimens (n=90) analyzed by SRA between March and July 2008 were subsequently tested by PF4 Enhanced ELISA (GTI, Waukesha, WI), and the Zymutest HIA ELISA (Hyphen BioMed, Neuville sur Oise, France). An additional ELISA was carried out on the specimens using the Zymutest heparin-bonded plate coated with purified, recombinant human interleukin-8 (IL-8) (72 aa form, Prospec, Rehovot, Israel). The second group consisted of archived specimens (n=32) that tested positive by SRA but negative by GTI HAT ELISA; these specimens were subsequently tested by the Zymutest HIA and the H:IL-8 ELISA. Results: Recombinant IL-8 (1μg/well) added to heparin-bound ELISA plates was recognized by anti-IL-8 (BD Biosciences), but not anti-PF4 (Leinco Technologies, Inc.) antibodies and was not displaced from the plate by addition of PF4 from normal serum at the dilution (1:100) used in the ELISA. Of the 90 consecutive specimens, 21 (23.3%) tested positive in both the GTI and the Zymutest HIA tests; 15 of the 90 (16.6%) tested positive by one but not both of the PF4-based ELISAs (Table 1). In this group of 90 specimens, 17 (18.9%) had OD > 0.500 on the heparin-bound IL-8 plate. Only 3 of the specimens bound to the H:IL-8 exclusively, while 14 were also positive in the GTI and/or Zymutest HIA ELISA. Thus, of the 36 specimens that tested positive in one or both of the PF-4-based ELISAs, 14 (38.9%) had antibodies that also targeted heparin-bound IL-8. Ten of the 90 specimens tested positive in the SRA. Six of SRA-positives had PF4-specific antibodies that did not cross react with H:IL-8, 3 had H:IL-8 reactive antibodies in addition to PF4 reactive antibodies, and 1 SRA positive specimen tested negative in all ELISAs. Table 1. Comparison of GTI HAT vs Zymutest HIA results: n = 90 consecutive patients Numbers in parentheses indicate how many specimens in each subgroup contained antibodies that bound to H:IL-8. Zymutest HIA + − Total + 21 (11) 9 (1) 30 GTI HAT − 6 (2) 54 (3) 60 Total 27 63 90 Among the set of 32 specimens that tested positive by SRA and negative by GTI ELISA, 8 tested positive in the Zymutest ELISA, including 4 that had OD > 0.500 on the H:IL-8 plate. The 24 specimens that tested negative by both HIT ELISAs ranged in percent serotonin release (tested with 0.1 U/ml H) between 21–84% with a median of 45.6%, and did not contain antibodies that bound the H:IL-8 plate. Conclusions: The data agree with other studies that show differences between results of commercially available HIT ELISA kits. The study also shows that over one third of specimens that test positive in the HIT ELISAs contain antibodies that are not specific for PF4, but also recognize heparin-bound IL-8. These results do not prove that the antibodies that bind PF4 targets are the same ones that bind IL-8. However, the significant degree of homology (40%) between the peptides suggests that the same antibodies may cross react with either target. The relevance of these antibodies is as yet unclear. Only 3% of specimens bound H:IL-8 plates but not PF4 plates, and these were not associated with SRA activity. Also HIT ELISA negative specimens with SRA activity, which showed only moderate percent serotonin release, did not contain H:IL-8-binding antibodies. The study did not find evidence of a role for H:IL-8 antibodies in HIT-related platelet activation tests.


2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. S33-S33
Author(s):  
Wenchao Ou ◽  
Haifeng Chen ◽  
Yun Zhong ◽  
Benrong Liu ◽  
Keji Chen

1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (04) ◽  
pp. 1215-1220 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Prasa ◽  
L Svendsen ◽  
J Stürzebecher

SummaryA series of inhibitors of factor Xa (FXa) were investigated using the thrombin generation assay to evaluate the potency and specificity needed to efficiently block thrombin generation in activated human plasma. By inhibiting FXa the generation of thrombin in plasma is delayed and decreased. Inhibitor concentrations which cause 50 percent inhibition of thrombin generation (IC50) correlate in principle with the Ki values for inhibition of free FXa. Recombinant tick anticoagulant peptide (r-TAP) is able to inhibit thrombin generation with considerably low IC50 values of 49 nM and 37 nM for extrinsic and intrinsic activation, respectively. However, the potent synthetic, low molecular weight inhibitors of FXa (Ki values of about 20 nM) are less effective in inhibiting the generation of thrombin with IC50 values at micromolar concentrations.The overall effect of inhibitors of FXa in the thrombin generation assay was compared to that of thrombin inhibitors. On the basis of similar Ki values for the inhibition of the respective enzyme, synthetic FXa inhibitors are less effective than thrombin inhibitors. In contrast, the highly potent FXa inhibitor r-TAP causes a stronger reduction of the thrombin activity in plasma than the most potent thrombin inhibitor hirudin.


1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 128-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.E. Lewis ◽  
W. P. Jeske ◽  
F. Leya ◽  
Diane Wallis ◽  
M. Bakhos ◽  
...  

SummaryDespite the use of potent anticoagulants such as r-hirudin and argatroban, the morbidity and mortality in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) patients remains unacceptable. Data from our in vitro investigations show that thrombin inhibitors do not block platelet activation induced by heparin antibodies and heparin but that GPIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors do block this process. We have treated four HIT positive patients with a combined therapy of thrombin inhibitor and GPIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor when treatment with thrombin inhibitor alone failed to alleviate acute thrombosis. Combination therapies included r-hirudin (Refludan®) with tirofiban (Aggrastat®) and argatroban (Novastan®) with abciximab (ReoPro®). A reduced dose of the thrombin inhibitor was used with the standard dose of the anti-platelet drug. In all cases, there was no overt bleeding which required intervention, and all patients exhibited clinical improvement or full recovery. These case studies suggest that treatment of active thrombosis in HIT patients with adjunct GPIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor therapy may be more effective than thrombin inhibitor treatment alone.


Infection ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Hamady ◽  
JinJu Lee ◽  
Zuzanna A. Loboda

Abstract Objectives The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the novel betacoronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was declared a pandemic in March 2020. Due to the continuing surge in incidence and mortality globally, determining whether protective, long-term immunity develops after initial infection or vaccination has become critical. Methods/Results In this narrative review, we evaluate the latest understanding of antibody-mediated immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and to other coronaviruses (SARS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus and the four endemic human coronaviruses) in order to predict the consequences of antibody waning on long-term immunity against SARS-CoV-2. We summarise their antibody dynamics, including the potential effects of cross-reactivity and antibody waning on vaccination and other public health strategies. At present, based on our comparison with other coronaviruses we estimate that natural antibody-mediated protection for SARS-CoV-2 is likely to last for 1–2 years and therefore, if vaccine-induced antibodies follow a similar course, booster doses may be required. However, other factors such as memory B- and T-cells and new viral strains will also affect the duration of both natural and vaccine-mediated immunity. Conclusion Overall, antibody titres required for protection are yet to be established and inaccuracies of serological methods may be affecting this. We expect that with standardisation of serological testing and studies with longer follow-up, the implications of antibody waning will become clearer.


2012 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 1400-1410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald M. Carter ◽  
Chalise E. Bloom ◽  
Eduardo J. M. Nascimento ◽  
Ernesto T. A. Marques ◽  
Jodi K. Craigo ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTIndividuals <60 years of age had the lowest incidence of infection, with ∼25% of these people having preexisting, cross-reactive antibodies to novel 2009 H1N1 influenza. Many people >60 years old also had preexisting antibodies to novel H1N1. These observations are puzzling because the seasonal H1N1 viruses circulating during the last 60 years were not antigenically similar to novel H1N1. We therefore hypothesized that a sequence of exposures to antigenically different seasonal H1N1 viruses can elicit an antibody response that protects against novel 2009 H1N1. Ferrets were preinfected with seasonal H1N1 viruses and assessed for cross-reactive antibodies to novel H1N1. Serum from infected ferrets was assayed for cross-reactivity to both seasonal and novel 2009 H1N1 strains. These results were compared to those of ferrets that were sequentially infected with H1N1 viruses isolated prior to 1957 or more-recently isolated viruses. Following seroconversion, ferrets were challenged with novel H1N1 influenza virus and assessed for viral titers in the nasal wash, morbidity, and mortality. There was no hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) cross-reactivity in ferrets infected with any single seasonal H1N1 influenza viruses, with limited protection to challenge. However, sequential H1N1 influenza infections reduced the incidence of disease and elicited cross-reactive antibodies to novel H1N1 isolates. The amount and duration of virus shedding and the frequency of transmission following novel H1N1 challenge were reduced. Exposure to multiple seasonal H1N1 influenza viruses, and not to any single H1N1 influenza virus, elicits a breadth of antibodies that neutralize novel H1N1 even though the host was never exposed to the novel H1N1 influenza viruses.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinead M. O’Donovan ◽  
Ali Imami ◽  
Hunter Eby ◽  
Nicholas D. Henkel ◽  
Justin Fortune Creeden ◽  
...  

AbstractThe COVID-19 pandemic caused by the novel SARS-CoV-2 is more contagious than other coronaviruses and has higher rates of mortality than influenza. Identification of effective therapeutics is a crucial tool to treat those infected with SARS-CoV-2 and limit the spread of this novel disease globally. We deployed a bioinformatics workflow to identify candidate drugs for the treatment of COVID-19. Using an “omics” repository, the Library of Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures (LINCS), we simultaneously probed transcriptomic signatures of putative COVID-19 drugs and publicly available SARS-CoV-2 infected cell lines to identify novel therapeutics. We identified a shortlist of 20 candidate drugs: 8 are already under trial for the treatment of COVID-19, the remaining 12 have antiviral properties and 6 have antiviral efficacy against coronaviruses specifically, in vitro. All candidate drugs are either FDA approved or are under investigation. Our candidate drug findings are discordant with (i.e., reverse) SARS-CoV-2 transcriptome signatures generated in vitro, and a subset are also identified in transcriptome signatures generated from COVID-19 patient samples, like the MEK inhibitor selumetinib. Overall, our findings provide additional support for drugs that are already being explored as therapeutic agents for the treatment of COVID-19 and identify promising novel targets that are worthy of further investigation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document