Detectable Minimal Residual Disease before Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Predicts Extremely Poor Prognosis in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2037-2037
Author(s):  
Katerina Muzikova ◽  
Eva Fronkova ◽  
Lucie Sramkova ◽  
Leona Reznickova ◽  
Renata Formankova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Clonal Evolution ◽  
Haematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract The level of minimal residual disease (MRD) prior to allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was shown to be an independent prognostic factor for the outcome of paediatric patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Retrospective studies which used (semi-)quantitation of clone-specific immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor (Ig/TCR) rearrangements documented feasibility and practicality of such an approach. Recently, this approach was disputed by Imashuku et al (BMT 2003) due to great occurrence of the clonal evolution and generally high MRD levels prior HSCT in their cohort. In our prospective study, MRD before and after HSCT was monitored in a cohort of 36 children with ALL consecutively transplanted in our centre between VIII/2000 and VII/2004. We used a quantitative real-time PCR approach introduced and standardised by European Study Group on MRD in ALL. In 25 of 36 patients MRD level prior HSCT was assessed (9 patients lacked adequately sensitive Ig/TCR target; two lacked analysable DNA prior HSCT). Seventeen patients were MRD-negative prior HSCT (including two with MRD level below the quantitative range 10(−4)) and 8 were MRD-positive up to 9x10(−2). In the MRD-positive subgroup, 7 events (6 relapses) occurred post-transplant in striking contrast to only one relapse in MRD-negative subgroup (EFS log-rank p<0.0001). MRD proved to be the only significant prognostic factor in a multivariate analysis (p<0.0001). Adoptive immunotherapy including donor lymphocyte infusions in patients with adverse dynamics of MRD after HSCT had only limited and/or temporary effect. Clonal evolution did not present a problem precluding MRD monitoring in any of patients suffering a post-transplant relapse. We show that MRD quantitation using clonal Ig/TCR rearrangements represents a feasible approach for the risk assessment in paediatric ALL patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT. However, our ability to respond to detectable MRD levels after HSCT and to avert an impending relapse is very limited. The change of the approach to MRD-positive patients prior HSCT is necessary because of very questionable benefit of HSCT in these children. Supported by grants MSM0021620813, FNM 9735 and GAUK 62/2004.

scholarly journals Immunophenotypic Markers Associated with Minimal Residual Disease Status and Outcome in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Missassi G ◽  
◽  
Ikoma-Colturato MRV ◽  
Bortolucci CM ◽  
Conte-Spilari JE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Minimal Residual

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is one of the most common hematologic malignancies, with a heterogeneous prognosis. Therefore, the recognition of biomarkers can be useful to understand the differences in patient outcomes. Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) has been considered a very important prognostic factor in MM. In parallel, the prognostic value of immunophenotypic markers expressed in MM Plasma Cells (PCs) has also been described. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of CD27, CD28, CD45, CD56, CD117 and β2-microglobulin expressions on the outcome of 154 MM patients undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT). The relation of each marker studied with the Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) was assessed, alone and in association with pre-ASCT MRD. Scores of good (GPM) and poor Prognostic Markers (PPM) were established, according to their respective survival curves. The expressions of CD27 and CD45 were associated to longer OS (p=0.013 and p=0.00, respectively) and PFS (p=0.00) as well as the absence of CD28 (OS p=0.026; PFS p=0.001) and CD56 (OS p=0.004; PFS p=0.009), in patients with undetectable MRD. The number of GPM showed an inverse correlation with the level of MRD (p=0.04), while a higher number of PPM was observed in patients with higher levels of MRD (p=0.04), which were also significantly associated with OS and PFS. In conclusion, although pre-ASCT MRD is a powerful prognostic factor in MM, these biomarkers can provide additional prognostic information and be used in the follow-up of MM patients.

scholarly journals Minimal Residual Disease Prior to and After Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: What Level of Negativity Is Relevant?

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Merli ◽  
Marianne Ifversen ◽  
Tony H. Truong ◽  
Hanne V. Marquart ◽  
Jochen Buechner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukaemia ◽  
Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Haematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Minimal Residual

Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment plays a central role in risk stratification and treatment guidance in paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). As such, MRD prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a major factor that is independently correlated with outcome. High burden of MRD is negatively correlated with post-transplant survival, as both the risk of leukaemia recurrence and non-relapse mortality increase with greater levels of MRD. Despite growing evidence supporting these findings, controversies still exist. In particular, it is still not clear whether multiparameter flow cytometry and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, which is used to recognise immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements, can be employed interchangeably. Moreover, the higher sensitivity in MRD quantification offered by next-generation sequencing techniques may further refine the ability to stratify transplant-associated risks. While MRD quantification from bone marrow prior to HSCT remains the state of the art, heavily pre-treated patients may benefit from additional staging, such as using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography to detect focal residues of disease. Additionally, the timing of MRD detection (i.e., immediately before administration of the conditioning regimen or weeks before) is a matter of debate. Pre-transplant MRD negativity has previously been associated with superior outcomes; however, in the recent For Omitting Radiation Under Majority age (FORUM) study, pre-HSCT MRD positivity was associated with neither relapse risk nor survival. In this review, we discuss the level of MRD that may require pre-transplant therapy intensification, risking time delay and complications (as well as losing the window for HSCT if disease progression occurs), as opposed to an adapted post-transplant strategy to achieve long-term remission. Indeed, MRD monitoring may be a valuable tool to guide individualised treatment decisions, including tapering of immunosuppression, cellular therapies (such as donor lymphocyte infusions) or additional immunotherapy (such as bispecific T-cell engagers or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy).

Methods and role of minimal residual disease after stem cell transplantation

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 681-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Ladetto ◽  
Sebastian Böttcher ◽  
Nicolaus Kröger ◽  
Michael A. Pulsipher ◽  
Peter Bader
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Minimal Residual

Augmentation of Sensitivity of FLT3/ITD Assay Allows Detection of Minimal Residual Disease In Stem Cell Transplant Recipients-Correlation with Flow Cytometric MRD Assessment

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1717-1717
Author(s):  
Maya Danielle Hughes ◽  
Rong Zeng ◽  
Kristen L. Miller ◽  
Soheil Meshinchi
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Flow Cytometric ◽  
Detection Assay ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 1717 FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3/ITD) is a somatic mutation that is associated with therapy resistance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Early data demonstrated low sensitivity for this assay, thus limiting its utility to the evaluation of diagnostic specimens, and precluding its utility in remission samples. We inquired whether the standard FLT3/ITD assay can be modified to enable its utility to detect presence of residual disease in remission specimens. Enhanced FLT3/ITD assay sensitivity was accomplished by altering annealing temperature, increasing the number of cycles as well as amount and concentration of the product that was subjected to capillary electropheresis. To assess the sensitivity of the enhanced assay, FLT3/ITD positive cells M4V11 were serially diluted in a population of ITD negative cells (HL60). The concentration of M4V11 cells in each sample ranged from 10% to 0.0001%. PCR product was subjected to capillary electropheresis and the appropriate region of the electropherogram was examined for the presence of the appropriate mutant product length. Appropriate FLT3/ITD signal was detected in dilutions down to 0.01%, validating our ability to detect extremely low levels of FLT3/ITD. We subsequently examined the remission marrows from patients with a history of FLT3/ITD who had undergone stem cell transplantation. Available bone marrow specimens (N = 51) from patients who underwent stem cell transplantation for FLT3/ITD-positive AML were analyzed and the result was correlated with the available standard PCR as well as the available MRD assessment by muti-dimensional flow cytometry; samples negative for FLT3/ITD by standard assay (N=11) were then subjected to the enhanced PCR methodology. Available ITD length for each patient was used for examination of the appropriate region of the electropherogram in each case. Of the available 51 bone marrow specimens analyzed, 23 specimens had FLT3/ITD detectable by standard PCR protocol. Using our modified PCR method and capillary electrophoresis, an additional 13 specimens had identifiable FLT3/ITD. In 6/11 patients, where initial FLT3/ITD was negative by standard methodology, enhanced assay identified FLT3/ITD signal. In each case, detection of FLT3/ITD by the enhanced assay was followed by morphologic or immunophenotypic emergence of disease, prompting therapeutic intervention. We further evaluated the ability to detect FLT3/ITD in patients with minimal residual disease by flow cytometry. 33 of the bone marrow specimens analyzed had a less than 5% abnormal blast population as detectable via flow cytometry. Among these samples, 7 had FLT3/ITD detectable using standard detection techniques. An additional 11 samples had detectable FLT3/ITD when our modified protocol was employed. Of the specimens that had less than 1% abnormal blast population as detectable via flow cytometry (N = 27), 4 had FLT3/ITD detectable using the standard detection assay; when our modified protocol was employed, an additional 6 samples had detectable FLT3/ITD. 17 bone marrow specimens had no abnormal blast cells detectable via flow cytometry; of these samples 1 had detectable FLT3/ITD using the standard detection assay, while an additional 3 had detectable FLT3/ITD using our modified assay. In four patients, FLT3/ITD was detected in bone marrow specimens found to have flow cytometric MRD of 0% (N=2), 0.1% (N=1) and 0.4% (N=1). In two patients with no detectable disease by MDF, both had emergence of morphologic (60% blast) or immunophenotypic disease by MDF (1.1%) within 4–6 weeks of detection of FLT3/ITD by enhanced assay. In this study, we demonstrate that simple modifications to the FLT3/ITD genotyping assay significantly increases its sensitivity and provides a highly sensitive and very specific assay for identifying this disease associated mutation in remission specimens. The enhanced assay can be incorporated into the standard evaluation of remission status for patients with FLT3/ITD. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document