A Multicenter Phase II Trial of Bortezomib in Patients with Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma: Efficacy with Manageable Toxicity in Patients with Unexpectedly High Rates of Baseline Peripheral Neuropathy.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2548-2548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Richardson ◽  
A. Chanan-Khan ◽  
R. Schlossman ◽  
N. Munshi ◽  
P. Wen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Skin Biopsy ◽  
Small Diameter ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Dexamethasone ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Autonomic Testing ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Small Fiber

Abstract Background: Bortezomib (Bz, VELCADE®) is a novel proteasome inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) in clinical trials. In a large randomized phase 3 trial, Bz achieved superior response rates (RR), TTP, and survival compared with high-dose dexamethasone in relapsed MM pts after 1–3 prior therapies. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) has been dose limiting, especially in pts with pre-existing PN. The objective of this multicenter phase 2 trial was to evaluate the activity and safety of Bz as monotherapy in previously untreated MM pts and prospectively examine PN at baseline (BL) and across treatment. Methods: Pts received Bz 1.3 mg/m2 on d 1, 4, 8, 11 of a 21-d cycle, with RR (CR + PR; EBMT) assessed every 2 cycles. Eligible pts had symptomatic MM with measurable disease and no prior chemotherapy. Concomitant steroids (> 10 mg/d), plt count < 30 x 109/L within 14 d of enrollment or > grade (G) 2 PN were exclusion criteria. RR, TTP, safety and incidence/severity of PN were evaluated. The effect on PN of dose modification (DM) and supplements with specified interventions for symptoms was assessed. Neurologic evaluation involving a pt questionnaire and neurologist’s exam was performed before and after treatment. A 33 pt subset had BL nerve conduction studies (NCS), quantitative sensory testing (QST), autonomic testing, and skin biopsy for quantitation of small-diameter neurite densities (ND). Toxicities were assessed by NCI-CTC, v3.0. Results: 63 pts (median age 60 y) have been treated. Data are available for 50 pts; 27 pts had IgG kappa MM and 21 pts had stage III disease. BL small-fiber neuropathy (SFN; normal NCS but abnormal QST or autonomic studies) was seen in 16/33 pts (48%). BL skin biopsy showed that 18/30 pts (60%) had small-fiber ND at the 15th percentile of age-adjusted norms; global mean density was at the 23rd percentile. NCS revealed BL axonal PN in 3/33 pts (9%). Among 46 pts evaluable for response, best response after ≥ 2 cycles was CR in 5 pts (11%) and PR in 9 pts (20%) for a RR of 30%. 13 pts (28%) achieved MR, 17 (37%) had SD, and 2 had PD (4%). The most common adverse events were PN, fatigue and rash. 24 pts (48%) developed PN, including 18 with G1 and 5 with G2. One pt had G3 PN and was discontinued. DM (dose reduction or discontinuation) was required in 9 pts. 23 pts have been studied after treatment. New large-fiber neuropathy (LFN) was seen in 4/23 pts (17%) and new SFN in 8 pts. Of 3 pts with BL LFN, 1 was not restudied, 1 had worsening SFN and 1 was unchanged. Small-fiber neurite counts were increased to the 35th percentile. Of 16 pts with BL SFN, 7 had worsening SFN (by QST). Bz was otherwise generally well tolerated. Conclusion: Bz as monotherapy has shown activity in newly diagnosed MM pts, with a CR of 11% and manageable toxicity. Underlying SFN appears more common in MM than appreciated. Treatment-emergent ≥ G2 PN was observed in 12% of pts and was G3 in 1 pt. Assessment of PN, the effect of interventions and skin biopsy analyses are ongoing.

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous formulation of bortezomib versus the conventional intravenous formulation in multiple myeloma

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marìa-Victoria Mateos ◽  
Jesús F. San Miguel
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Subcutaneous Administration ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Intravenous Route ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Dose Dexamethasone ◽  
New Guidelines

The discovery of the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway first, and the proteasome inhibitors thereafter were not made in the hope of improving the treatment of malignant diseases. However, bortezomib, the first in class proteasome inhibitor introduced in the clinical practice has contributed to improve the outcome of patients with multiple myeloma, at relapse or disease progression as well as upfront. The results observed in a large randomized trial (APEX) comparing bortezomib and high-dose dexamethasone demonstrated a significant benefit for bortezomib in terms of response rate, progression-free and overall survival. These results led to bortezomib being approved for use in relapsed and/or refractory myeloma patients. Subsequent studies demonstrated that its activity could be enhanced in combination with other drugs; and the next step was to move to the newly diagnosed patient population; in fact, bortezomib–melphalan–prednisone (VMP) is approved as a standard of care for newly diagnosed elderly patients. However, toxicity, especially peripheral neuropathy, as well as the intravenous route required for its administration are the two most significant bortezomib-related issues. To try to reduce the peripheral neuropathy, new guidelines for its management and the introduction of weekly schedules of administration have contributed to significantly decrease its incidence and the subcutaneous administration has been recently introduce to avoid the intravenous (IV) route. Results obtained in phase I/II and III studies have confirmed that subcutaneous administration is feasible and represents an additional step towards the optimization of bortezomib use, resulting in a probably more convenient method than the IV route that is at least as effective.

scholarly journals Multicenter Phase II Feasibility Trial of High-Dose Tamoxifen in Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

2004 ◽  
Vol 96 (8) ◽  
pp. 636-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Decaudin ◽  
M.-C. Etienne ◽  
P. de Cremoux ◽  
Z. Maciorowski ◽  
J.-M. Vantelon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Feasibility Trial ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Multicenter Phase

Renal Impairment in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Consensus Statement on Behalf of the International Myeloma Working Group

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (33) ◽  
pp. 4976-4984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Evangelos Terpos ◽  
Asher Chanan-Khan ◽  
Nelson Leung ◽  
Heinz Ludwig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Light Chain ◽  
Renal Injury ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Acute Renal Injury ◽  
High Dose Dexamethasone ◽  
Cast Nephropathy ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Renal impairment is a common complication of multiple myeloma (MM). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula is the recommended method for the assessment of renal function in patients with MM with stabilized serum creatinine. In acute renal injury, the RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss and end-stage kidney disease) and Acute Renal Injury Network criteria seem to be appropriate to define the severity of renal impairment. Novel criteria based on eGFR measurements are recommended for the definition of the reversibility of renal impairment. Rapid intervention to reverse renal dysfunction is critical for the management of these patients, especially for those with light chain cast nephropathy. Bortezomib with high-dose dexamethasone is considered as the treatment of choice for such patients. There is limited experience with thalidomide in patients with myeloma with renal impairment. Thus, thalidomide can be carefully administered, mainly in the context of well-designed clinical trials, to evaluate if it can improve the rapidity and probability of response that is produced by the combination with bortezomib and high-dose dexamethasone. Lenalidomide is effective in this setting and can reverse renal insufficiency in a significant subset of patients, when it is given at reduced doses, according to renal function. The role of plasma exchange in patients with suspected light chain cast nephropathy and renal impairment is controversial. High-dose melphalan (140 mg/m2) and autologous stem-cell transplantation should be limited to younger patients with chemosensitive disease.

scholarly journals Clinical Characteristics, Electrophysiology, and Skin Biopsy of 38 Peripheral Neuropathy Cases with Small Fiber Involvement of Various Etiologies

2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (14) ◽  
pp. 1683-1688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Sun ◽  
Li-Zhi Liu ◽  
Yi-Fan Li ◽  
Zhao-Hui Chen ◽  
Li Ling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Skin Biopsy ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Small Fiber

High-dose dexamethasone for refractory or relapsing multiple myeloma

1991 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Friedenberg ◽  
Robert A. Kyle ◽  
William H. Knospe ◽  
John M. Bennett ◽  
Anastasios A. Tsiatis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Dexamethasone

Lenalidomide Plus High-Dose Dexamethasone Provides Improved Overall Survival Compared to High-Dose Dexamethasone Alone for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Results of 2 Phase III Studies (MM-009, MM-010) and Subgroup Analysis of Patients with Impaired Renal Function.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3547-3547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna Weber ◽  
Michael Wang ◽  
Christine Chen ◽  
Andrew Belch ◽  
Edward A. Stadtmauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Creatinine Clearance ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Impaired Renal Function ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Dexamethasone ◽  
Duration Of Response

Abstract Lenalidomide is a novel, orally administered immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) that has single-agent activity against multiple myeloma (MM) and additive effects when combined with dexamethasone. We have previously reported improved response (OR), time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Len-Dex) compared to dexamethasone-placebo (Dex) based on the results of 2 phase III trials (MM-009, North American, 353 pts; MM-010, Europe, Australia, and Israel, 351 pts). In both trials patients with relapsed or refractory MM not resistant to dexamethasone, were treated with dexamethasone 40 mg daily on days 1–4, 9–12, and 17–20 every 28 days and were randomized to receive either lenalidomide 25 mg daily orally on days 1–21 every 28 days or placebo. Beginning at cycle 5, Dex was reduced to 40 mg daily on days 1–4 only, every 28 days. Patients were also stratified with respect to B2M (≤2.5 vs. > 2.5 mg/mL), prior stem cell transplant (none vs. ≥ 1), and number of prior regimens (1 vs > 1). At a median follow-up from randomization of 17.1 mos (MM-009) and 16.5 mos (MM-010), both studies continue to show significant improvement with Len-Dex compared to Dex in OR (MM-009: 61% vs 20.5%, p<.001; MM-010: 59.1% vs. 24%, p<.001, respectively), TTP (MM-009: 11.1mos vs. 4.7mos, p<.001; MM-010: 11.3mos vs. 4.7mos, p<.001, respectively), and OS (MM-009: 29.6mos vs. 20.5mos, p<.001; MM-010: not estimable vs 20.6mos, p<.001, respectively). Pooled data from both trials demonstrates a significant improvement in duration of response for pts achieving ≥ PR with 122/216 pts (56.5%) who received Len-Dex continuing in remission (med. duration of response not reached but > 68.1 wks) compared to only 22/76 pts (28.9%) treated with dexamethasone alone (med. duration of response 22.1 wks, p<.001). An additional subgroup analysis was performed on pts with impaired creatinine clearance (cr cl). No significant difference in response rate, TTP, or OS was noted for patients with cr cl above or below 50 ml/min who were treated with Len-Dex, but for 16 pts with cr cl <30ml/min, med. TTP and OS was shorter than for those with cr cl >30ml/min, but still significantly higher than for pts treated with Dex. Grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia was significantly higher in pts with impaired renal function (<50ml/min, 13.8%; >50ml/min 4.6%, p<.01; <30ml/min, 18.8%, >30 ml/min, 5.5%, p<.05), but there was no difference for G3–4 neutropenia at either cutoff. Phase I–II evaluation to establish appropriate dosing in pts with cr cl < 30ml/min, particularly with respect to thrombocytopenia is warranted, but should not underscore improved OR, TTP, and OS for pts treated with Len-Dex regardless of creatinine clearance.

Sequential High-Dose Dexamethasone and Response Adapted PAD (Bortezomib, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone) or VAD (Vincristine, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone) Induction Chemotherapy Followed by High-Dose Chemotherapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma; Open-Labelled, Multicenter Phase 2 Study (KMM-94 Study)-Interim Analysis

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2044-2044
Author(s):  
Jin Seok Kim ◽  
Cheolwon Suh ◽  
June-Won Cheong ◽  
Kihyun Kim ◽  
Yang Soo Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
High Dose Dexamethasone

Abstract Abstract 2044 Background: Induction treatment followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard therapy for the newly diagnosed younger patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Although new drugs such as lenalidomide or bortezomib have been shown the promising results as induction treatment, many different type of induction treatment regimens still have been used. We evaluate the efficacy and safety of the short course of high dose dexamethasone (HD dexa) and the response adapted PAD (Bortezomib, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone) or VAD (Vincristine, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone) induction chemotherapy in the newly diagnosed younger patients with MM. Methods: 107 newly diagnosed patients with MM from 21 institutions received 2nd cycles of HD dexa followed by PAD or VAD chemotherapy according to the response to the initial high dose dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) + near CR rate after ASCT. Among 107 patents enrolled this study from November 2009, 25 patients (23%) have been dropped out. This trial will be continued until total 210 patients will be enrolled. The trial is registered on National Cancer Institute website, number NCT01255514. Results: One hundred seven patients (58 male, 49 female) were enrolled (median age; 56). 26 (24%) light chain disease were included. 31 (29%) patients were D-S stage II and 67 (63%) were stage III. According to the ISS, 23 (22%) patients had stage I, 51 (48%) had stage II and 33 (31%) had stage III. 26 (24%) patients had abnormal cytogenetics. There were 31% del13, 7% del17, 19% t(4;14), 15% t(14;16) and 28% t(11;14) in FISH analysis. Among the 82 evaluable patients, CR + PR rate was 48% (39/82) after 2nd cycles of HD dexa therapy. 39 patients (48%) received subsequent VAD chemotherapy and 43 patients (52%) received PAD chemotherapy. Among the 64 patients finished VAD or PAD chemotherapy, CR + PR rate was 83% (79%, 26/33 in VAD group vs. 87%, 27/31 in PAD group). 56 patients were finished ASCT until now. CR + near CR rate after ASCT were 61% (58% in VAD group vs 63% in PAD group). Mortality rate of this trial was 13% (11/82). The cause of death was disease progression (n=3), bleeding (n=1) and infections (n=7). Among 82 patients in whom VAD or PAD chemotherapy was actually performed, 1 year overall survival (OS) rate was 84.7%. 1 year survival rate was 93.8% versus 77.2% (P=0.049) with VAD versus PAD (median follow-up; 9.1 months). Conclusion: Risk adapted approach using initial steroid response showed good response results after ASCT compared with previous trial (CR + near CR rate of IFM 2005-01trial-Bortezomib+dexa induction & ASCT was 35%, J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4621–9) The MM patients who had poor response to HD dexa also showed similar good response rate after ASCT compared with the patients who had good response to HD dexa treatment in this trial. PAD re-induction therapy after failure of initial steroid induction treatment might overcome the inferior results in the high risk MM patients. Therefore, initial steroid response adapted strategy might be the more cost-effective approach in the newly diagnosed ASCT eligible MM patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Phase 2 Trial of Concurrent Monosialotetrahexosylganglioside in the Prophylactic Treatment of Bortezomib-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients of Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5399-5399
Author(s):  
Liang Wang ◽  
Zhongjun Xia ◽  
Xiaoqin Chen
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Subcutaneous Injection ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Phase 2 Trial

Abstract Backgrounds Bortezomib is an important drug in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), and peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a significant dose-limiting toxicity of bortezomib. No effective prophylaxis has been defined for PN. Monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM), a nerve-protecting drug, is often used to promote growth of nerve and function restoration of damaged nerve. The role of GM in the prophylaxis of bortezomib-induced PN in MM patients has never been investigated. Methods A phase 2 clinical trial was conducted in newly diagnosed MM patients to evaluate the value of GM in the prophylaxis of bortezomib-induced PN. All eligible patients were treated with VD (bortezomib 1.3mg/㎡,subcutaneous injection, d1 ,8,15,22, and dexamethasone 40mg, po,d1 ,8,15,22, 4 weeks a cycle) or CyBorD (cyclophosphamide 300mg/㎡,po,d1 ,8,15, bortezomib 1.3mg/㎡,subcutaneous injection, d1 ,8,1 5,22, and dexamethasone 40mg, po,d1 ,8,15,22, 4 weeks a cycle) for at least 4 cycles. GM was used at a dosage of 100mg/day intravenously at d1 -2, 8-9, 15-16, 22-23. No other nerve-protective drugs or thalidomide-containing regimens were allowed. The primary endpoint was overall incidence rate of PN (the grade of PN was recorded according to CTCAE v3.0). The secondary endpoints included duration of PN, complete response rate after 4 cycles of treatment, 1-year PFS and OS rate. (This trial was registered in ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02093910). Results From February 2014 to February 2015, 25 patients of newly diagnosed MM were enrolled. The median age was 55 years old (37-75), and male to female ratio was 19:6. 5 patients had ISS stage I disease, 6 patients with stage II, and the remaining 14 patients with stage III. All patients received a median of 4 cycles (range 2-9) of Bortezomibcontaining regimens. At the time of data analysis, 84% of patients had at least partial response, 48% had at least very good partial response, and 24% had complete response. 7 patients experienced PN after a median of 2 cycles (range 1-4) of treatment, resulting in the overall PN rate of 28%. Among these 7 patients, only 1 patient (4%) had grade 2 PN, leading to dose reduction of bortezomib, and all other patients had grade 1 PN. During treatment, 1 patient (4%) had grade 2 diarrhea, and another 1 patient (4%) had herpes zoster infection. The concurrent use of GM did not introduce new side effects and seemed not compromise the efficacy of bortezomib. At a median follow up time of 8 months, 1-year PFS rate and OS rate were speculated to be 69.8% and 100%, respectively. Conclusions The early-term analysis of this phase 2 trial found it feasible to concurrently use GM and bortezomib-containing regimens, and GM had the potential role of reducing bortezomib-induced PN rate and severity without compromising efficacy. This needs to be validated in future phase 3 randomized clinical trials. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document