Risk Adapted BEACOPP Regimen Based on Early Scintigraphy Can Reduce the Cumulative Dose of Chemotherapy for Standard and High Risk Hodgkin Lymphoma (HD) with No Impairment of Outcome.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 815-815
Author(s):  
Eldad J. Dann ◽  
Rachel Bar Shalom ◽  
Nissim Haim ◽  
Ada Tamir ◽  
Menachem Ben Shachar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract A prospective study evaluating the outcome of HD pts whose chemotherapy was tailored based on results of scans performed after 1or 2 cycles of chemotherapy reducing the cumulative chemotherapy for early responders and maximizing the dose for late responders. Study was initiated in 1999 for patients with classical HD age 18–65y. Eligibility criteria were either stage I, II with unfavorable features (see table) or any stage III or IV HD. Those with I-II B or bulky or any Stage III-IV were defined according to IPS. Patients with standard risk were treated with 2 cycles of standard BEACOPP (SB). Those with high risk were treated with 2 cycles of escalated BEACOPP (EB). GA67 or FDG PET scan was performed at diagnosis and after the 1st or 2nd cycle for 57 and 55 pts respectively. If the early scan remained positive then additional 4 cycles of EB were administered, otherwise, SB was given. 108 pts 44 F64 M age 18–63y (median 33) who had at least 1 year of follow up are reported. The CR rate was 97%. The 4-yr disease free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) is 84% and 90% respectively at a median follow up of 35-month (5-70). The 4-yr DFS and OS are similar for standard and high risk patients. The disease progressed in 3/10 pts with an interim positive PET versus 1/40 negative scans (p<0.03) and in 1/13 (8%) interim positive Ga67scan versus 7/44 (16%) negative scan (NS). Negative predictive value of early normal PET and GA67 scans are 98% and 84% respectively. Only one patient developed secondary leukemia following salvage therapy and high dose chemotherapy. One patient died during therapy from unrelated cause. Conclusion: PET is a useful tool for early interim decision regarding dose of chemotherapy. Early PET allowed for chemotherapy reduction in 80% of high-risk pts. Only 14% of standard risk patients required dose intensification. Similar DFS and OS can be obtained regardless of IPS. 6 cycles of risk adapted BEACOPP are effective. Standard Risk High Risk Standard BEACOPP Escalated BEACOPP Stage I, II ≥ Age 50yrs; ≥ 4 sites; “B” symptoms or Bulky, stage III,IV IPS 0-2 IPS 3-7

scholarly journals SEOM clinical guideline for management of adult medulloblastoma (2020)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Luque ◽  
M. Benavides ◽  
S. del Barco ◽  
L. Egaña ◽  
J. García-Gómez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Molecular Alterations ◽  
Adult Medulloblastoma ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Standard Risk

AbstractRecent advances in molecular profiling, have reclassified medulloblastoma, an undifferentiated tumor of the posterior fossa, in at least four diseases, each one with differences in prognosis, epidemiology and sensibility to different treatments. The recommended management of a lesion with radiological characteristics suggestive of MB includes maximum safe resection followed by a post-surgical MR < 48 h, LCR cytology and MR of the neuroaxis. Prognostic factors, such as presence of a residual tumor volume > 1.5 cm2, presence of micro- or macroscopic dissemination, and age > 3 years as well as pathological (presence of anaplastic or large cell features) and molecular findings (group, 4, 3 or p53 SHH mutated subgroup) determine the risk of relapse and should guide adjuvant management. Although there is evidence that both high-risk patients and to a lesser degree, standard-risk patients benefit from adjuvant craneoespinal radiation followed by consolidation chemotherapy, tolerability is a concern in adult patients, leading invariably to dose reductions. Treatment after relapse is to be considered palliative and inclusion on clinical trials, focusing on the molecular alterations that define each subgroup, should be encouraged. Selected patients can benefit from surgical rescue or targeted radiation or high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous self-transplant. Even in patients that are cured by chemorradiation presence of significant sequelae is common and patients must undergo lifelong follow-up.

scholarly journals Randomized trial comparing standard vs sequential high-dose chemotherapy for inducing early CR in adult AML

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 1103-1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato Bassan ◽  
Tamara Intermesoli ◽  
Arianna Masciulli ◽  
Chiara Pavoni ◽  
Cristina Boschini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Here we evaluated whether sequential high-dose chemotherapy (sHD) increased the early complete remission (CR) rate in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) compared with standard-intensity idarubicin-cytarabine-etoposide (ICE) chemotherapy. This study enrolled 574 patients (age, 16-73 years; median, 52 years) who were randomly assigned to ICE (n = 286 evaluable) or sHD (2 weekly 3-day blocks with cytarabine 2 g/m2 twice a day for 2 days plus idarubicin; n = 286 evaluable). Responsive patients were risk-stratified for a second randomization. Standard-risk patients received autograft or repetitive blood stem cell-supported high-dose courses. High-risk patients (and standard-risk patients not mobilizing stem cells) underwent allotransplantation. CR rates after 2 induction courses were comparable between ICE (80.8%) and sHD (83.6%; P = .38). sHD yielded a higher single-induction CR rate (69.2% vs 81.5%; P = .0007) with lower resistance risk (P &lt; .0001), comparable mortality (P = .39), and improved 5-year overall survival (39% vs 49%; P = .045) and relapse-free survival (36% vs 48%; P = .028), despite greater hematotoxicity delaying or reducing consolidation blocks. sHD improved the early CR rate in high-risk AML (odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.74; P = .0008) and in patients aged 60 years and less with de novo AML (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27-0.78; P = .003), and also improved overall/relapse-free survival in the latter group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.94; P = .01), in standard-risk AML, and postallograft (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.96; P = .03). sHD was feasible, effectively achieved rapid CR, and improved outcomes in AML subsets. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00495287.

Outcome of Adult AML at First Relapse Following a Risk-Oriented Strategy: An Update of the Northern Italy Leukemia Group (NILG) Experience

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4385-4385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Cavattoni ◽  
Enrico Morello ◽  
Elena Oldani ◽  
Tamara Intermesoli ◽  
Ernesta Audisio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
First Relapse ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Standard Risk ◽  
Group 1

Abstract INTRODUCTION The impact on post-relapse survival of selected prognostic factors and salvage therapy (finalized to perform an allo-SCT) was retrospectively analyzed in 172 patients (patients) with relapsed non-APL AML, who had been initially treated with standard induction and risk-adapatiented consolidation. The aim was to identify factors associated with a better outcome at first relapse. METHODS All 172 patients were at first recurrence following consolidation of CR1 with high-dose Ara-C (HiDAC) multicycle therapy supported by blood stem cells (standard risk, as defined by mixed clinical-cytogenetic criteria) or allo-SCT in case of high-risk prognostic profile. Median age at relapse was 55 y (range 21–70). CR1 duration was &lt;6 months in 50 patients (29%), ranging from 0.6 to 52,7 mo (median 9,1). High risk patients were 128/172 (74%) and 43/172 patients (25%) had an unfavourable cytogenetics (CG). One hundred-eleven patients (64%) received HiDAC and 24 (14%) an allo-SCT according to study design. RESULTS 140 patients (81%) received salvage treatment. The remaining 32 patients (19%) received palliation and all of them died. The median OS was 17.1 mo, with a 2yOS of 34%. Favorable prognostic factors identified by univariate analisys were: favourable or intermediate CG (p=0,007), standard risk category according to first line protocol (p=0.004), availibility of a HLA matched donor (p= 0.048), achievement of an early CR1(p=0,000), HiDAC as first line therapy(p=0,000), alloHSCT perfomed at relapse (p=0,000) and a DFS from CR1&gt;12 mo (p=0,000). In multivariate analysis favourable or intermediate CG and DFS &gt;12 mo were confirmed as independent prognostic factors (p=0,036 and p=0,001 respectively). Among the 140 patients, 50 received an allo-SCT following relapse (36%, group 1), and the remaining 90 (64%, group 2) received high dose chemotherapy alone (85), autologous SCT (2), or DLI (3, in case of previous alloSCT). Both groups were comparable regarding age &gt;55 y, prior allo-SCT and risk class at diagnosis. After salvage therapy, 44 patients(88%) in the group 1 achieved CR2, compared to 26 patients (29%) in the group 2. The median duration of CR2 was 9 mo (range 2–64) and 3 mo (range 1–34) in group 1 and 2 respectively. NRM was 17/140: 12 patients (24%) in the allo-SCT group and 5 (6%) in group 2. The 2yOS was 57% and 23% respectively (p=0,000). Moreover, among 50 alloSCT patients, survival was affected by risk category at diagnosis: 2yOS of 19 (38%) standard risk patients was 83% compared to 42% in 31 high risk patients (62%) (p=0.01). This risk stratification has no impact on OS in the group 2. CONCLUSIONS DFS &gt; 12 mo and standard risk category at diagnosis, according to NILG protocol, are the most important independent positive prognostic factors impacting OS of AML relapsed patients. The availibility of a HLA matched donor and a subsequent intensification with alloSCT may offer substantial salvage rates and its outcome is affected by the risk stratification at diagnosis. Nevertheless, high risk patients could benefit from alloSCT, reaching an 2yOS of 42%.

Survival in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Undergoing Therapy with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone: Impact of High-Risk Cytogenetic Risk Status on Outcome

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 95-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prashant Kapoor ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Rafael Fonseca ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
Thomas E Witzig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease with very divergent outcomes that are dictated in a large part by specific cytogenetic abnormalities, as well as other prognostic factors such as the proliferative rate of marrow plasma cells. Prognostic systems incorporating these factors have shown clinical utility in identifying high-risk patients, and are increasingly being utilized for treatment decision-making. However, the prognostic relevance of these factors may change with the application of novel therapies. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of risk-stratification (incorporating plasma cell metaphase cytogenetics, interphase fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) and the slide-based plasma cell labeling index (PCLI)) in a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed MM treated initially with lenalidomide + dexamethasone (Rev-Dex). Methods: From March 2004 to November 2007, 100 consecutive patients treated with Rev (25mg/day) on days 1 through 21 of a 4-week cycle in combination with dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed myeloma, were identified. High-risk MM was defined as presence of any one or more of the following: hypodiploidy, monoallelic loss of chromosome 13 or its long arm (by metaphase cytogenetics only), deletion of p53 (locus 17p13) or PCLI ≥ 3% or immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) translocations, t(4;14) (p16.3;q32) or t(14;16)(q32;q23) on FISH. PFS and OS survival estimates were created using the Kaplan Meier method, and compared by log-rank tests. Results: The median estimated follow-up of the entire cohort (N=100) was 36 months. The median PFS was 31 months; the median OS has not been reached. The 2- and 3-year OS estimates were 93% and 83%, respectively. 16% patients were deemed high-risk by at least one of the 3 tests (cytogenetics, FISH or PCLI). Response rates (PR or better) were 81% versus 89% in the high-risk and standard risk groups, respectively, P=NS; corresponding values for CR plus VGPR rates were 38% and 45% respectively. The median PFS was 18.5 months in high-risk patients compared to 37 months in the standard-risk patients (n=84), P<0.001(Figure). Corresponding values for TTP were 18.5 months and 36.5 months, respectively, P=<0.001. OS was not statistically significant between the two groups; 92% 2-year OS was noted in both the groups. Overall, 95 patients had at least one of the 3 tests to determine risk, while 55 patients could be adequately stratified based on the availability of all the 3 tests, or at least one test result that led to their inclusion in the high-risk category. The significant difference in PFS persisted even when the analysis was restricted to the 55 patients classified using this stringent criterion; 18.5 months vs. 36.5 months in the high-risk and standard- risk groups respectively; P<0.001. In a separate analysis, patients who underwent SCT before the disease progression were censored on the date of SCT to negate its effect, and PFS was still inferior in the high-risk group (p=0.002). Conclusion: The TTP and PFS of high-risk MM patients are inferior to that of the standard-risk patients treated with Rev-Dex, indicating that the current genetic and proliferation-based risk-stratification model remains prognostic with novel therapy. However, the TTP, PFS, and OS obtained in high-risk patients treated with Rev-Dex in this study is comparable to overall results in all myeloma patients reported in recent phase III trials. In addition, no significant impact of high-risk features on OS is apparent so far. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the impact of risk stratification on the OS of patients treated with Rev-Dex. Figure Figure

Long-term toxicity of high-dose sequential chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cells support in very high-risk early breast cancer patients (pts)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11101-11101
Author(s):  
A. Bernardi ◽  
C. Zamagni ◽  
S. Quercia ◽  
F. Massari ◽  
N. Cacciari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Stem Cells ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Sequential Chemotherapy ◽  
Haematopoietic Stem Cells

11101 Background: High-dose chemotherapy with autologous haematopoietic stem cells support (HDCT) in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer has been abandoned by many, but it remains unclear the real role of this treatment and a meta-analysis of high-dose chemotherapy adjuvant trials is ongoing. Methods: Twenty-five consecutive high risk early breast cancer pts with at least 40 months of follow-up treated at our institution with HDCT are included in the present analysis. Median age was 44 (range 24–59 years) and 15 pts were premenopausal. The median number of axillary lymph-nodes metastases was 13 (range 3–49) and the pathological stage was IIB in one pt, IIIA in 3 pts, IIIB in one pt and IIIC in 20 pts. Estrogen and/or progesterone receptors were positive in 15 pts and both negative in 10 pts. The 10- year risk of relapse of pts with disease characteristics similar to those included in our study population is 80–85%. The HDCT regimen used was cyclophosphamide 7g/m2 plus G-CSF (followed by apheresis of peripheral haematopoietic stem cells), methotrexate 8 g/m2 followed by thiotepa 600 mg/m2 and melphalan 160 mg/m2 or by mitozantrone 60 mg/m2 and melphalan 180 mg/m2 and stem cells reinfusion. Results: At a median follow-up of 7 years (range 3,5 - 8 years) 13 pts (52%) relapsed and 10 pts (40%) died. The most common sites of recurrence were lung, liver and bones; 6 pts developed brain metastases and in 2 cases a bone marrow infiltration was documented. No toxic deaths and no long term toxicities, except irreversible amenorrhoea in all the premenopausal pts, were observed. No secondary malignancies occurred.The median relapse-free survival is 65,1 months, while the median overall survival has not been reached yet. Conclusions: In our experience high-dose sequential chemotherapy with autologous stem cells support is a safe treatment with no toxic deaths and no long-term toxicities. This regimen should therefore be further investigated if translational research will be able to identify subgroups of pts with the highest probability to benefit from intensive chemotherapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Long-term health status of high-risk neuroblastoma survivors treated with high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10054-10054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandrine Haghiri ◽  
Chiraz Fayech ◽  
Christelle Dufour ◽  
Claudia Pasqualini ◽  
Stephanie Bolle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Second Cancers

10054 Background: Current treatment strategies including high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation rescue (HDC-SCT) have improved 5-year event-free survival for high-risk neuroblastoma (HRNB) patients, but with an increased risk of late treatment-related toxicities. Methods: Between 1980 and 2012, 439 children were treated for HRNB with HDC-SCT in Gustave Roussy (GR), among which 145 were alive and disease-free at 5-year post-SCT. Long-term health data have been collected for those 145 patients, prospectively within the long-term follow-up clinic in GR or retrospectively from pediatric consultations. Results: With a median follow-up post-SCT of 15 years (range 5-34), we observed 6 late relapses, 11 second cancers (including 3 papillary thyroid carcinomas; median delay = 20 years post-SCT [18-22]) and 9 deaths. Event-free and overall survival at 20-year post-SCT were 82% (95%CI = 70–90) and 89% (95%CI = 78–95), respectively. A second health event was observed in 135 patients (median = 3/patient), including 103 patients with at least 1 severe event (median = 1/patient). Cumulative incidence at 15-year post-SCT for second cancers is 4%, cardiac diseases 8%, thyroid 11%, renal 7%, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia 14%, dental mal-development 70%, and severe hearing loss 20%. Height-for-age z-score was ≤-2 for 30 patients (21%) and ≤-3 for 12 patients (8%). After Busulfan-Melphalan conditioning regimen, 40/43 females and 33/35 males had a gonadal insufficiency. Conclusions: Long-term consequences of HRNB treatment including HDC are frequent and disabling, mainly due to hearing loss and gonadal insufficiency.

Impact of proteasome inhibitor vs. IMiD maintenance therapy on outcomes of patients with high-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20557-e20557
Author(s):  
Eric Leon Tam ◽  
David Joseph Iberri ◽  
Michaela Liedtke ◽  
Lori S. Muffly ◽  
Parveen Shiraz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitor ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Standard Risk

e20557 Background: The ideal choice of maintenance therapy in patients with HRMM high-risk multiple myeloma remains unknown. We analyzed the outcomes of patients with HRMM undergoing transplant receiving different maintenance approaches. Methods: Patients with MM undergoing their first ASCT from 2012-19 within 1 year of diagnosis were identified from the prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing ASCT. HRMM was defined as having t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), del17p13, or gain 1q detected on fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Results: Of the 412 patients undergoing ASCT within 1 year of diagnosis, 333 had FISH data available and of these, 37% (124/333) patients had high-risk cytogenetics. Distribution of HR cytogenetics was as follows: deletion 17p: 37% (n = 46), t(4;14): 27% (n = 34), t(14;16) or t(14;20): 12% (n = 26), gain1q: 31% (n = 41). 9% (n = 12) had more than one HR abnormality. In patients with HRMM, median age at transplant was 59 years (range: 39 to 73), and 61% (n = 103) were males. 64% (n = 107) of high-risk patients received post-transplant maintenance therapy. Maintenance therapy in this group included a proteasome inhibitor (PI) in 34% (n = 29), immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) in 59% (n = 51), or both in 7% (n = 6). There was no difference in baseline characteristics of HRMM patients receiving PI vs. IMiD maintenance, except that patients with del17p were more likely to receive PI maintenance therapy (55% vs 28%, p = 0.01). (Table) After a median follow-up of 3.1 years from diagnosis, patients with HRMM had inferior PFS compared to patients with standard risk disease, with median PFS of 3 vs. 4.8 years, p < 0.001. Amongst the 86 HRMM patients receiving maintenance therapy, median PFS in patients receiving PI vs. IMiD vs. both PI + IMiD maintenance was 3 vs. 3.2 vs. 2.2 years, respectively, log-rank p = 0.7. In the sub-group of patients with 17p deletion, median PFS in the three groups was 3 vs. 2.9 vs. 2.2 years, respectively, log-rank p = 0.7. Conclusions: Patients with HRMM have inferior PFS compared to patients with standard risk disease. We observed similar outcomes in HRMM patients post-transplant regardless of the choice of maintenance therapy. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document